The FDA granted emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in children aged 12 and over in the USA back on the 10th May 2021. The EMA has recently followed suit, recommending the Pfizer jab should be administered to children aged 12 and over in EU countries.
Because of this there can be no doubt that the MHRA will follow the FDA and EMA’s lead and also grant emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer jab for use in children aged 12 and above.
But are you aware that the clinical trials carried out by Pfizer on children aged 12 – 15 reveal that 86% of children who were given at least one dose of the jab suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to serious?
The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).
That fact sheet contains two tables that detail the alarming rate of side effects and damage experienced by 12 – 15- year-old children who were given at least one dose of the Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” (gene therapy).
The tables shows that 1,127 children were given one dose of the mRNA jab, but only 1,097 children received the second dose. This fact in itself raises questions as to why 30 children did not receive a second dose of the Pfizer jab, and we doubt the answer is pretty.
Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab a shocking 86% experienced an adverse reaction. Of the 1,097 children who received a second dose of the jab a shocking 78.9% experienced an adverse reaction.

Table 6 within the FDA fact sheet shows that 20.3% of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the Pfizer jab experienced fever, meanwhile 39.3% of the 1,097 children who received a second dose experienced fever.
Another 60.1% of the children who received the first dose also experienced fatigue, whilst 66% of those who received a second dose experienced fatigue.
Another 55.3% of the children who received the first dose also experienced a headache, and 64.5% of those who received a second dose also experienced a headache.
27.6% of the children who recieved the first dose also experienced chills, whilst 41.5% of the children who received a second dose experienced chills. 2.8% of the children who received a first dose experienced vomiting, whilst 2.6% of the children who received a second dose experienced vomiting.
The final specific adverse reaction that the FDA list is diarrhoea. Of the 1,127 children who received the first dose 8.0% suffered with diarrhoea. Of the 1,097 children who received a 2nd dose 5.9% experienced diarrhoea.

It’s shocking to find that even after 86% of children reported an adverse reaction after the first dose that the study was allowed to proceed and the same children were given a second dose of the jab.
The FDA document also states that 0.04% suffered an extremely serious adverse reaction but does not go in to detail on the type of reactions that occurred. 0.04% may sound small but lets put this into perspective. In the United Kingdom there are approximately 4 million children aged between 12 – 15-years-old. If every single one of these children were to receive just one dose of the Pfizer mRNA jab then according to the study we can expect to see 1,600 suffer an extremely serious adverse reaction which could include death.
But if this then extends to children under the age of 12 and a similar rate of extremely serious adverse reaction occurs then we can expect to see that number increase to around 5,200.
However we cannot forget that the study shows that 86% of recipients suffered an adverse reaction. This means that if just 12-15-year-old’s are given one dose of the Pfizer jab we can expect to see 3.4 million of them suffer an adverse reaction.
When comparing this rate against the actual risk of children even mildly suffering from the alleged Covid-19 disease we are bewildered at how medicine regulators have concluded that the benefits of these experimental vaccines outweigh the risks.
And these are experimental vaccines, the FDA document even tells the public this in which it states the following –
‘The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).‘
The FDA also confirms in their fact sheet that the Pfizer jab (alongside all other Covid jabs) is still in clinical trials –
‘Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.‘
They are coming for your children. Your silence and compliance has allowed this to happen. Any rational person, after reading this “fact sheet” from the FDA, would surely find the courage to say “enough is enough”?
Please share this widely so parents across the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States can make an informed decision for their children.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
Its much more shocking when you remember that there was no pandemic ,just a scamdemic created by using the false pc testing results that deceived the world almost totally .There were no significant changes to global death .rates compared to previous years at all .Its all a lie, a huge dupliticoious deception . Like the moderators and writers of zero hedge and NY intelligencer.magazine and many many others .Deceivers ,manipulators ,frauds .Everywhere .” The people are totally fooled ” Marilyn Monroe .
I have 20 years experience in biology and you are correct. The foundation of the sarscov2/covid-19 disease scam is the fraudulently configured PCR test along with the erroneous death recording methods. It’s so very obvious and yet no sing of this stopping. al part of the great fascist reset of course. Global death rates in 2020 were completely normal and in line with prior years growth.
[…] Shocking 86% of Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid Vaccine in Clinical Trial […]
[…] DAILY EXPOSE ON MAY 30, 2021. Find Article + Audio […]
[…] those tests, specifically the Pfizer ones found that 86% of children in the extremely short and small trial suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] BY THE DAILY EXPOSE ON MAY 30, 2021 • […]
[…] de-a doua doză, variind de la reacții ușoare la reacții grave? După cum arată publicația The Daily Expose, informațiile au fost publicate într-un document de informare al FDA, care poate fi consultat […]
[…] This is the new normal. […]
[…] they not read the report on the extremely short and small clinical trial which found 86% of the children suffered an adverse […]
[…] mRNA “vaccine” to be used in children aged 12 and over. This is despite the fact 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to serious in the extremely short, and small clinical […]
[…] following article can be found here. We have taken the liberty of adding some […]
[…] by The Daily Expose […]
I wanted to warn the population. I blew a very big whistle in 2018.
After my Doctors overdosed me, broke my brain barrier and I was sprayed in the face in the doctors office.
I have tried desperately to inform authorities and government. Only to be targeted and abused.
I wish to inform you of Petroleum Byproduct polypropylene pp05 medical implants. That’s usually hernia mesh. Unfortunately they have been using polypropylene mesh in over 300 other operations worldwide.
From Apendix to Transplants.
This is urgent to understand that these implants are not inert in the human body and create long term illness and death for profit.
That would be to me medical human trafficking.
I found x2 in myself with a private scan. No informed consent. I am also ex healthcare end of life, Dementia. I exposed the elderly in carehomes with no informed consent medical implants from polypropylene pp05 mesh.
As a Whistle-blower I am afraid humanity will never understand what is going on.
Big pharma government mules hide the petroleum byproduct polypropylene pp05 genocide.
As when I was sprayed in 2018 almost dying…. The infection propagated in the antibiotic resistant biofilm.
Attempted murder that looks like to me.
Maybe they have used mesh for decades creating ill health by stealth.
I have evidence…. Science backed.
MSM avoid me like the plague now. They all know…. Mp’s, Government… They hide dark secrets about the NHS…. What exactly has been going on pharming from pharmakia… Used in a vile system. I wonder how many they have deliberately given Dementia to….. To silence…. Its very disturbing.
DR Ajay Bedi….. Retired…. Overdosed me…. He is a company director in a pharmaceutical company.
Very disturbing indeed.
I don’t know what you think covid 19 is….. But I know what it is not.
So let’s see… believe you that a cadre full of people are doing all of this, in the day and age of cameras and media everywhere, and are allowing you to speak out about this “top secret” stuff oh and you are the only one saying this.
Or you are a lying lunatic.
Occam’s razor. Look it up.
And that does not include long term damage which can include potentially fatal cytokine storm in the event they receive a later flu vaccine or come into contact with the live virus.
[…] The Daily Expose(2) Armstrong […]
[…] following article can be found here. We have taken the liberty of adding some […]
[…] is a lie, the extremely short and small trial found that 86% of children in the extremely short and small trial suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] The Daily Expose The FDA granted emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in […]
[…] following article can be found here. We have taken the liberty of adding some […]
[…] doză, variind de la reacții ușoare la reacții grave? După cum arată publicația The Daily Expose, informațiile au fost publicate într-un document de informare al FDA, care poate fi […]
[…] been given emergency approval for use in children aged 12 to 17 in Canada. This is despite the fact 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious in the very short […]
[…] been given emergency approval for use in children aged 12 to 17 in Canada. This is despite the fact 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious in the very short […]
[…] been given emergency approval for use in children aged 12 to 17 in Canada. This is despite the fact 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious in the very short […]
[…] The risks of giving children the vaccine far outweigh any reward: During a Pfizer vaccine trial carried out on children aged 12 to 15, 86% of children who were given at least one dose of the jab suffered an adverse reaction ranging fro…. […]
[…] is a lie, the extremely short and small trial found that 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] Rosie falsely made the claim during her GMB appearance that the Covid-19 vaccines – particularly the Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs – do not cause any detrimental side effects, but she failed to mention that 86% of children an adverse reaction to the Pfizer Covid vaccine in clinical trials. […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Original source: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfi… […]
[…] Despite being approved for children in May, during the Pfizer vaccine trials, 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to … […]
[…] conto di quanto sopra, e considerando il fatto che l’ 86% dei bambini ha subito una reazione avversa al vaccino Pfizer che varia da lieve a grave nello studio […]
[…] government would happily roll out an experimental gene therapy for children, especially a jab that caused 86% of children in a trial to suffer adverse reactions ranging from mild to severe. These are crimes against humanity being committed against the masses, yet parents are willingly […]
[…] the above into account, and considering the fact 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccine ranging from mild to serious in the extremely short clinical trial, are you really going to allow […]
[…] one of the Pfizer vaccine trials involving children, 86% of participants suffered an adverse reaction to the jab. Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab, 86% experienced an adverse reaction […]
[…] the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] looks like the vaccine does protect against getting Covid-19.” Another shameless blatant lie. In actual fact “A Shocking 86% of Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid Vaccine in […]
Here’s what you all need to do… stop having people tell you what a piece of paper says. Actually read it. Yes, 86% of those 12-15 had a SOLICITED LOCAL RESPONSE. It means it’s expected. It’s the body’s immune system reacting as it should. Stop spreading lies that are only going to kill more people.
Maybe, just maybe, spend the same amount of time passing the truth along rather then the lies you are telling.
Now that I know you are around, I’ll be around to debunk everything you say.
All this site is for is a way to scam people out of their money by telling them things they want to hear.
DONATE, WHAT WITH? SHIRT BUTTONS?
[…] the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely […]
[…] de l’étude extrêmement courte. S’ils l’avaient fait, ils auraient vu que 86% des enfants de l’étude ont subi une réaction indésirable allant de légère à extrêmement grave.Seuls 1.127 enfants ont participé à l’essai, […]
[…] seemed to ignore the fact the 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer jab in a clinical trial. The trials were carried out by Pfizer on children aged 12-15, where 1,127 children were given one […]
Hmmmm! I’ve actually looked at the link and the table 5 onwards. Can you please show me the severe affects from the vaccine? All I see are headaches and sore areas at the injection site. Isn’t this normal for a vaccine?
Just so you know, I’m not vaccinated and have no reason to do so but I am finding a few of your articles being overly sensational… I come here for honest reporting but I’m starting to question the legitimacy of it.
It’d be good if the most recent comment was on top. Shows the last eat first.
[…] the Pfizer mRNA jab to be safe for use in children, however, is anyone’s guess when you consider 86% of children who took part in the short two month trial suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer jab ranging […]