Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.
By a concerned reader
The 5 PHE tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report, separated by 4 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.
People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.
Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people…
Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months.
30-50 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.
The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).
Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status…
Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1019992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 35 and week 38 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1022238/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_39.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf
Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above). The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time).
But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?
This is interesting, but aren’t we jumping the gun here?
I decorticated the number of deaths for myself (week 40), recalculated their rate per 100000 people according to the population and vaccination rates per age group etc. I end up with even worse numbers or the unvaxed than the official document…
What the numbers show is that indeed, the vaxed are dying less than the unvaxed. They are also less hospitalised.
BUT, as this article shows, the vaxed get infected more often than the unvaxed.
That is interesting… So they end up being infected more, thus they will spread more, but are hospitalised less and die less.
It can mean many things, and immune suppression can be one of them, but then people would probably be hospitalised more and die more too, wouldn’t they?
It could also mean that vaxed people are more and more likely to behave unsafely and get the rona…
More digging required.
You also have to look at healthy user bias and how the CDC defines vaccinated. Reporters use partially vaccinated and unvaccinated interchangeably. Also, there is a statistical illusion because reports combine data from multiple months like April to July. In April and before that, not many were fully vaccinated so most deaths were from unvaccinated. If that is confusing, consider the following.. In October 2020, a vaccine didn’t exist so 100% deaths were in the unvaccinated. This does not mean the vaccine worked as a vaccine didn’t exist in October 2020.
You rally want your decision to take the shot to be validated in some way, any way, don’t you. I think you’ll find Gareth Hawker just below to be absolutely accurate in his summary. Best post here.
By which messages, numbers or reports are you so certain that the vaccinated are dying less? It makes no sense, as most people probably have had covid by now just by spreading it.. I had it in March right at the start, although I was very careful.
These numbers are manipulated. You are not considered vaxed untill 2 weeks after your second dose. Almost all deaths are within 48 hours of their second dose of the vaccine which are deemed to be unvaccinated deaths.
So you can’t admit the jab is a bad idea no matter what information is presented to you? I’d say you are in a cult but you don’t realize it yet.
I have checked a couple of the author’s calculations, and came up with the same result. But there is no need to calculate to get the gist.
Per 100,000, shortly after vaccines were given, more unvaccinated fell ill than vaccinated. As time went by, this was reversed.
The author draws a number of conclusions from this, about ADE etc. These are essentially speculation (albeit highly informed).
So the vaccine seems to do some good to begin with, then starts to harm, and gradually becomes even more harmful.
All this depends on the correct identification of a ‘case’, usually by PCR of LFT or both. The validity of these tests is much disputed.
However, accepting the government’s own criteria, the vaccines are soon worse than nothing, and become even more harmful by the week.
Best post here, and something that would have been identified had proper testing been even half done.
This graph shows all-cause mortality, so does not depend on questionable diagnosis. Unfortunately, the age groups are not separated.
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/09/all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england.html
This seems to suggest the people refusing vaccines are generally healthier, for whatever reasons, and the aggregate number of deaths is decreasing.
Interesting. But there’s another possible scenario here. Those who die from the vaccine could account more so for the later vaccinate spike in deaths rather than waning protection.
Plus it only goes to week 26. As the protection wanes on the vaccine we ought to see it reverse even more.
The orginal unvaccinated spike as stated appears to be just seasonal for almost everyone as not that many people have been vaccinated by week 6.
Sorry if Im missing it but I cannot find any data in your story or the linked surveillance reports that support – “Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”.
If someone can pointit out to me id be greatful but at this stage it just seems to be an assumption and not fact
Yup, I’ve jhad a good look. The tables don’t marry with anything in the reports. I was passed then link by a clever boffin who doesn’t go down the rabbit hole. Manufactured and fake !!!
The first 9 columns in each of the 5 weekly tables are a direct copy from Table 2 or Table 4 of the 5 PHE reports. If you indeed had a look then you are blind.
You’re right. Those are direct copy. But the rest, i.e. the most important part that is related to immune system degredation is absent.
It’s a deduction made from the statistics which show vaccinated overtaking unvaccinated, step by step, in covid cases. All things equal, they would be the same. Therefore he’s making a presumption that something else could be going on and likely it is immune system suppression or something similar. But the vaccinated are dying less and hospitalised less, so it’s hard to form a conclusion. Unless the stats are being manipulated somehow???
Agree. Show me the study so I can read it myself.
While the Exposé article demonstrates that, according to PHE statistics, the proportion of the vaccinated who are falling ill is increasing, the Exposé explanation for why this is happening seems to be speculative rather than based on solid fact.
Here is a summary of a variety of explanations, with an indication of how the vaccinated can avert the worst of the vaccine’s bad effects. It is written by Dr Thomas E Levy MD JD:
https://orthomolecular.acemlna.com/lt.php?notrack=1&s=9827f7b932a79e016632c0bacd3fb58f&i=205A209A1A10301
You have got it. The sooner people start treating vaccine side effects be they immunological or cardio vascular or neuropathic, the better. We need to treat all vaccinated people as if they have long Covid
[…] The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggests that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are losing about five percent of their immune systems per week. […]
[…] Die neuesten Daten aus dem PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report des Vereinigten Königreichs deuten darauf hin, dass Menschen, die gegen das Wuhan-Coronavirus (Covid-19) „vollständig geimpft“ wurden, pro Woche etwa fünf Prozent ihres Immunsystems verlieren. […]
[…] Die neuesten Daten aus dem PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report des Vereinigten Königreichs deuten darauf hin, dass Menschen, die gegen das Wuhan-Coronavirus (Covid-19) „vollständig geimpft“ wurden, pro Woche etwa fünf Prozent ihres Immunsystems verlieren. […]
[…] Die neuesten Daten aus dem PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report des Vereinigten Königreichs deuten darauf hin, dass Menschen, die gegen das Wuhan-Coronavirus (Covid-19) „vollständig geimpft“ wurden, pro Woche etwa fünf Prozent ihres Immunsystems verlieren. […]
[…] di lasciapassare, oltre a sviluppare presumibilmente una sindrome da immunodeficienza acquisita (QUI). Il green pass, allora, è un “premio” per che cosa, se i vaccinati possono infettarsi e […]
[…] bombshell report published by The Expose (UK) is entitled, “A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated […]
there maybe some variation in what is in each individual shot, some of them are just saline.
Do not take the Covid-19 Kill Shots period and that is final. These vaccines are deliberately scientifically engineered and designed to murder ALL of the “legal American Patriots” who voted for President Donald J Trump. Do not take the vaccines period and that is final.
[…] The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggests that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are losing about five percent of their immune systems per week. […]
[…] The Expose has the story. […]
[…] […]
[…] The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggested that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan Coronavirus (Covid-19) were losing about five percent of their immune systems per week. “If this continues then 30-50 year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defense by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.” […]
[…] The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggested that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan Coronavirus (Covid-19) were losing about five percent of their immune systems per week. “If this continued then 30-50 year-olds would have 100% immune system degradation, or zero viral defense by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 would have lost their immune systems by March next year.” […]
[…] article reports on the Public Health England statistics, and speculates, very credibly, that the […]
[…] έκθεση βόμβα που δημοσιεύτηκε από το The Expose (Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο) έχει τον τίτλο: “Μια σύγκριση των επίσημων […]
[…] イギリス政府の最新公式報告書、ワクチン接種された人は後天性免疫不全症候群（AIDS）を発症している https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/ […]
[…] don’t have time to delve into the report linked HERE and outlined below, but if anyone in the know wants to comment, please do so. What do we think: […]
[…] The Expose has the story. […]
[…] https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/ […]
[…] bombshell report published by The Expose (UK) is entitled, “A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Think of the ‘shows’ from visual data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] über die vergangenen vier Wochen bzw. fünf Reports (weitere tabellarische Aufstellungen sind hier zu […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] The latest United Kingdom PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on COVID cases show that the doubly vaccinated 40-70-year-olds have already lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50-year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, meaning zero viral defense by Christmas, and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have completely lost their immune systems by March of next year. […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
[…] News) The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggests that people who have been […]
[…] From TheExpose.uk: A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year. (full article here) […]
[…] Consider the ‘indications’ from observable data. […]
I was cured from HSV-2 with no side effects. He also do love spell to bring back ex lover, he can fix marriage/relationship breakup.
Email; R.buckler @hotmail com
I highly recommend him to anyone suffering from
ORAL HERPES VIRUS,
HERPES ZOSTERS,
FIBROID,
PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT,
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION,
Where can we find the Formula used in this calculations. It is mentioned as Pfyzer formula but I was not able to find it anywhere. Please provide link to it. Thank you!
U-V/V if V>U and U-V/U if U>V. It is stated at the top of Column 10 which is the result of that formula. It is the normalised absolute ratio between the vaxxed (V) and the unvaxxed (U) case rates per capita.
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 9 if positive (U>V)
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 8 if negative (V>U)
yes I saw that before asking…….but where one can find that this formula is actually real one? It says (as per Pfyzer formula) but nowhere on Pfyzer site such formula or calculations can be found. Those calculations are only found here on this report not on the original PDF files linked to the UK data base.
I can’t share it on Facebook, as it gets censored. Facebook says it is false information
“It is also unclear where these percentages came from or how they were calculated, as the percentage figures do not appear anywhere in the reports that the article cited.”
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/10/fact-check-public-health-england-data-does-not-suggest-that-covid19-vaccines-cause-aids.html
Where does immune system degradation data come from? I couldn’t see this exists in the given link (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf)
Ah: Now I see why everyone is asking where do the percentages come from! The fake fact checkers are at it again. The formula for the percentages is at the top of column 10, the column containing the percentages. It is the same formula that all the newspapers which own the fact chekcing sites quoted to represent that the vaccines were 94% and 95% efficient. It is a normalised absolute ratio of the vaxxed and unvaxxed case numbers.
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 9 if positive (U>V)
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 8 if negative (V>U)
Not satified with failing to publish the immonological ramifications of the latest PHE data or even the latest data itself, they add to their cover up by slandering those who do. Find a mainstream newspaper which even publishes the one trivial and vaguely immunological conclusion drawn in the Vaccine Surveillance Report for week41 which said..
“In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated”. – PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 41.
No MSM newspaper will publish that statement because that one line completely destroys the basis for vaccine passports.
[…] イギリス政府の最新公式報告書、ワクチン接種された人は後天性免疫不全症候群（AIDS）を発症している https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/ […]
[…] Naturales) Los últimos datos del Informe de Vigilancia de vacunas PHE del Reino Unido sugieren que las personas que han […]
Thank you so much for all of your invaluable hard work. I have been sharing this article far and wide alongside another to help people boost their natural immunity. The supplements mentioned in this article are what the ‘compliant’ and non-compliant need to take to boost natural immunity this winter… https://www.wilddigital.co.uk/mast-cell-activation-syndrome-essential-oils/
Exactly how are they determining that the immune system is deteriorating? Has there been a study done? What is the study? Who is conducting the study. These graphs are nice, but I could make these too if I wanted. This is scary stuff to put out without any “proof”. I would love to read the what yests they did to determine this.
The fact that the PHE statistics paint an entirely different picture from that in the PHE text is itself a major cause for concern.
The updated version of this Exposé article is well worth looking at, and especially the comments by Lords Witnesses.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/15/its-worse-than-we-thought-fully-covid-vaccinated-ade/
Roxane
Pls tell your profession.