Breaking News

EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.



The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.

The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .

The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.

The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.

Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.

The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.

The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.

The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.

The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.

All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.

The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.

This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).

The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.

Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.

The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.

This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.

The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.

Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.

This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.

Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.

The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.

Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.

The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA

As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.

However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.

This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.

The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.

Conclusion

This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.

The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.

One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.

Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.

But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.

Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?

Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?

Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?

Could this just be a quality control issue?

A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.

Share this page to Telegram
4.9 28 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

276 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
10 months ago

There were several articles in mainstream sources last March about the quality control issues in the McPherson plant, they can still be accessed. Mold is a big issue there.

Donald
Donald
Reply to  Grouchy Math Grad
10 months ago

I am now making extra £19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly £20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by followACV instruction on the given website……. http://Www.Paycash1.com

Last edited 10 months ago by Donald
R G Kernodle
R G Kernodle
Reply to  Donald
10 months ago

Donald, you are very rude to spam this article with an totally unrelated post about your marketing endeavors. Keep that crap out of here. Do you not understand how inappropriate that sort of crap is. I’m not here to be your marketing audience. I’m here to read the article and see the comments about the subject being talked about. Get some manners.

Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
Reply to  Grouchy Math Grad
10 months ago

That’s McPherson, KS, the same plant the whistleblower in the article is talking about.

Frank Shulse
Frank Shulse
10 months ago

Which states received the “good” vaccines? Did the good vaccines come from one source factory or many?

Mark McDougall
Mark McDougall
10 months ago

Can you advise us the states? Which states have the deadly ones been sent to?

eiwr
eiwr
Reply to  Mark McDougall
10 months ago

“Which states have the deadly ones been sent to?”

The ones with the most dead people.

Whiskey
Whiskey
10 months ago

It might be the injections, but that’s not the only variable here. There’s also the environment that they were given in, the population demographic(s) they were given to, etc.

Is there more detailed information on the locations where these injections were administered? And, on the population(s) that they were given to? (age, race, sex, etc.)

I’d like to see whether there were correlations in any of those cases.

Beaver
Beaver
Reply to  Whiskey
10 months ago

that doesn’t appear to hold up as the environments would be variable due to the wide distribution.

Whiskey
Whiskey
Reply to  Beaver
10 months ago

It doesn’t have to be the same interaction causing an issue in each location. There’s no reason that it would be. But, environment is absolutely important. For example, if a population is situated by severe air pollution and their lungs are irritated and distressed, they’re going to be more likely to suffer complications from any respiratory infection, injections or not. Air pollution happens in numerous locations all over the world. A population in the North might be more vulnerable to infection and complications due to less sunlight (and a lack of supplementation to compensate for low Vitamin D) in the winter months. Establishing causality isn’t as simple as showing that a lot number resulted in more deaths. A lot number given to an area with an average age of 80+ would’ve had more deaths associated, even if the shots were saline, because people 80+ are more likely to die, in general. I don’t believe the injections are harmless. But, I also don’t believe that it’s so simple to establish causation.

Gordon Bird
Gordon Bird
10 months ago

Well!…What the hell did you expect? Openness and honesty from Mass-Murderers!?…LA5 9RA England

Ian Parker
Ian Parker
10 months ago

It seems very likely that their is no single vaccine per manufacturer but that there are instead numerous derivations of each designed to test different properties.

Why would the manufacturers not do this when they have been handed a no-liability exemption in relation to conducting any experiments they choose upon an unsuspecting population. The moreso given that various governments and media are committed to covering up any horrific outcomes and denying all links.

The companies will never get a better chance to conduct such unfettered experiments on an entire population, no matter how unethical they may be. They appear to be grasping that opportunity with both hands.

Think4yrself
Think4yrself
Reply to  Ian Parker
10 months ago

I believe you may be correct. Get the book “Vaccine A”. A physician tells of his horrific experience when our U.S. military required the participation of military personnel in a disastrous experiment by vaccine developers at Dover Airforce base. Differing amounts of adjuvant were intentionally administered by batch lot but officials denied the adjuvant altogether initially. The book is available on Audible as well as book form through amazon.

Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
Reply to  Think4yrself
10 months ago

I will look into it. The US military has a pretty bad record of using its soldiers as disposable lab rats.

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Grouchy Math Grad
10 months ago

Gulf War syndrome and Spanish Flu spring to mind. Fort Dettrick.

Sandy
Sandy
10 months ago

Without knowing which states got which batches we can’t draw many conclusions here as regards the tactics being employed. Also, I imagine there are numerous formulas for each manufacturer, varying concentrations of active substances in each batch and even varying outcomes depending upon whether the vaccine was injected into muscle or the needle happened to find its way directly into a larger blood vessel. Still…this is good intel.

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Sandy
10 months ago

Read up on the Cutter incident. Briefly, Cutter labs made a bad batch and it killed a lot in one county or state(?) An uproar, but instead of stopping, they redistributed all over the states. Something that all makers do now. Mix batches up and spread out deaths so no alarm is caused.

Malatok
Malatok
10 months ago

If you are feeble minded enough to believe a word your gubermint says then you deserve to be poisoned by the maniacs now culling the useless eaters.

You are the disease and their covaid$ death squirt the cure.

Even pigs smell death the nearer they get to the slaughterhouse…not sheeple however.

Your kakistocracy only wants what’s best for
you…..nudge..nudge…wink…sputter…. cackle.
 
Professor Mattias Desmet on EweTueb “How can so many still buy into the narrative”

Tricia
Tricia
Reply to  Malatok
10 months ago

No one “deserves” this. Yes it’s agonising seeing so many people duped by the “leaders” while others can see the lies so clearly. Yes, we have suffered as a result, and we’ve been ridiculed and vilified trying to warn them, but they don’t deserve to be on the receiving end of evil, murderous actions for it.

ouw
ouw
Reply to  Tricia
10 months ago

What if the person on the ‘receiving end’ was fired by the ‘innocent’ person who ‘doesn’t deserve it’, and as a consequence dies on the street (300,000 die on the streets of the uk every year, and it’s millions in america). Do they still ‘not deserve it’? I’d say they do.

A Wyatt Man
A Wyatt Man
Reply to  Tricia
10 months ago

You who continue to empower these jewish liars who openly call for the genocide of my people deserve far worse than the physical and spiritual death you suffer for your compliance.

NBS
NBS
Reply to  Tricia
10 months ago

Lemmings who rush over the cliff receive the penalty for their ignorance, but they are to be pitied, not condemned. Those who are pushing and pulling the lemmings toward the cliff, however, are another matter. Much of the “medical profession” and most governments fall into the latter group.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] October 31, 2021EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced accordi… […]

Hershel Goldberg
Hershel Goldberg
10 months ago

ɢᴏᴏᴅ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴡᴇ ᴊᴇᴡꜱ ᴀʀᴇ 100% ʟᴇɢᴀʟʟy ɪᴍᴍᴜɴᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴀʟʟ ᴅᴀᴍᴀɢᴇꜱ ᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇᴅ ʙy ᴛʜᴇ ᴍɪꜱᴛᴀᴋᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴊᴇᴡɪꜱʜ ᴩʜᴀʀᴍᴀᴄᴇᴜᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ᴄᴏᴍᴩᴀɴɪᴇꜱ, ᴀʟʟ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴊᴇᴡɪꜱʜ ᴍᴇᴅɪᴀ ᴀɴᴅ yᴏᴜʀ ᴊᴇᴡɪꜱʜ ɢᴏᴠᴇʀɴᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴄᴏʟʟᴜᴅᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ɪᴛ ꜱᴏ. ꜱʜᴀʟᴏᴍ, ɢᴏyɪᴍ! ᴏᴜʀ ᴡᴏʀᴅ ꜰᴏʀ yᴏᴜ ᴍᴇᴀɴꜱ “ʟɪᴠᴇꜱᴛᴏᴄᴋ” ꜰᴏʀ ᴀ ʀᴇᴀꜱᴏɴ!

tjd
tjd
Reply to  Hershel Goldberg
10 months ago

Are you aware a team of arab muslims (working from Germany of all places)’invented’ the pfizer vaccine that is now decimating Isreal and the rest of the wht peoples world? just sayin/do your reasearch.
https://www.islamicity.org/66698/muslim-scientists-behind-pfizers-successful-covid-19-vaccine/

Barb
Barb
10 months ago

From Dr Mike Yeadon refering to this article on Telegram:
https://t.me/robinmggroup/377545

This information about different safety profiles of different “lots” (batches of finished product of covid19 vaccines) is completely without precedent.
I’m thinking about it & I don’t yet have clear in my mind what the envelope of plausible / possible explanations are.

But the bottom line is that the majority of lots were associated with good short term safety, few hospitalisations & death (true both for Pfizer & Moderna).

But in both cases, a small number of vaccine lots are associated with incredibly high rates of adverse events including deaths.

How can this possibly happen? Drug manufacturing is performed to exacting standards of control. The ‘active’ agent is made in batches (it cannot be guessed how many doses each batch makes, because no one has ever made commercial scale mRNA products before.

But each batch of what’s called “drug substance” is then used to formulate, fill, pack & label various lots of finished drug product.

Testing methods are developed for all of the manufacturing steps, together with standards for the results to be considered acceptable.

Something happened between drug substance & drug product which resulted in a small number of finished lots for distribution which were destined to kill huge numbers of people.

Possible explanations (not exhaustive):

1. Errors made in the final steps of manufacturing which resulted in certain batches bring reasonably benign & others extraordinarily deadly. I just cannot imagine the kind of mistakes which could produce such radically different clinical profiles. For example, poor handling during shipping & storage prior to administration to people. Problem I have with this is that such handling errors (eg allowing temperate to rise way above limits defined in stability testing) usually result in drug product which doesn’t work properly, as it’s degraded, not in drug product that’s incredible dangerous.

2. At some point in manufacturing, someone or some entity actively modified what was being filled into vials, and it was this which resulted in extreme skew of clinical safety profile.

There has been so much truly awful behaviour of “elites” that I’m simply not willing (as I would have historically) to dismiss the possibility that this has been done on purpose. 

What I do know, and this is a test of whether there’s the slightest sign of integrity from these companies as well as the regulatory agencies, is that all use of the affected produce must immediately cease, all batches of drug substance & lots of drug product should cease.

The materials should be recalled to a place of stable storage & an intense analytical investigation initiated.

Unless factors are found which adequately explain the huge differences in clinical adverse event profiles, administration to humans must not restart.

If the manufacturers do not exhibit sufficient control of drug product, the authorisation they hold from various regulatory authorities are utterly voided.

Just when you thought this debacle couldn’t possibly get any worse, it gets much worse.

Expect to hear more about this.

Meanwhile, who in their right mind would roll up their sleeve?

Note, I have no information on the other vaccines or other territories not covered by this analysis of VAERS.

Best wishes 
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

Clara
Clara
Reply to  Barb
10 months ago

Thank you, Dr. Yeadon.

Is it possible that what is here defined as a “batch” could actually vary considerably in size? Thus, could one batch simply vaccinate a much larger group of people relative to another “batch?” Or does the word batch signify a quantity that is uniform across all batches

Clara
Clara
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

Also, is it possible that those “bad batches” erroneously contain much higher dosages than they are supposed to? As I re-read the article, it appears that Modern fared even worse than Pfizer. What we know so far is that Moderna’s dose is higher than Pfizer’s to start with, and that higher dose appears to increase its toxicity relative to Pfizer. I wonder if, with mRNA, it all comes down to dosing. That’s what determines toxicty.

Just speculating here since I know absolutely nothing about mRNA.

Clara
Clara
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

It certainly does look very suspicious that the “bad batches” were distributed widely across many states, whereas the “safe batches” went to a far fewer number of states. Did somebody at the company know which batches were good and which batches were bad? Did they send the bad batches to many states in order to spread out the deaths and injuries and call less attention to the specific problematic lot numbers?

Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

That would be my guess.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

What’s the definition of a good batch Clara? Considering that no one ever isolated this so called virus? Pure saline? I doubt they would give vitamin shots.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
E. Welkenstein
E. Welkenstein
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

Hi Clara, earlier this year Pfizer batches varied from 1 million to 10 million. I can’t find more recent information. ( https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2021/02/07/how-covid-vaccine-made-step-step-journey-pfizer-dose/4371693001/ ) The bumps in the Pfizer deaths-per-lot graph *could* be noise, but if they’re not, batch size doesn’t explain them: having a peak at 0 deaths which then decays indicates <1 average deaths/batch, but it looks like there might be another peak at ~30 deaths/batch. That’s more than a factor of 10 difference.

The Pfizer AE graph cannot be explained by size, because you have a peak at 0 AE/batch and then another at ~1500 AE/batch, which is very clearly *not* noise and is a huge difference.

If we then assume that the AE:deaths ratio is roughly consistent across batches (an assumption which might be wrong), then the overall statistics indicate ~60:1 AE:deaths. The AE peak at ~1500/batch should then correspond to a deaths-per-batch peak of about ~25, which is where the might-be-noise deaths/batch peak is.

The article does not explicitly state how much the very-high-AE batches and high-death batches overlap, so there are possible explanations with some batches having high AE but low deaths, and the deaths-per-batch bumps being noise. I suspect this is not the case, as both deaths and AE correlate with distribution to many states, but some comment by the authors of the article would be helpful. An AE vs. deaths/batch scatter plot would clarify the point nicely.

I have not found batch size information for Moderna, and I don’t see a straightforward AE/batch graph here.

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Barb
10 months ago

The Cutter incident happened. Briefly, Cutter labs made a bad batch and it killed a lot in one county or state(?) An uproar, but instead of stopping, they redistributed all over the states. Something that all makers do now. Mix batches up and spread out deaths so no alarm is caused.

Stephen Silverstein
Stephen Silverstein
10 months ago

The government is lying because that’s what they do!

Jeffrey Hall
Jeffrey Hall
10 months ago

Continuing to learn the extent of the impacts, death and debilitation and intentional harm

abrogard
abrogard
10 months ago

So this kind of clears the vaccines. They’re okay. They’re harmless. IF you don’t get a bad batch.

But there are bad batches and obviously the whole thing should be stopped until the nature of those bad batches is identified.

Sabotage? Poor quality control? What? It needs to be known, doesn’t it?

Ruth Mauger
Ruth Mauger
Reply to  abrogard
10 months ago

Actually the long term effects from all c jabs are soon to be evident like auto immune diseases

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  abrogard
10 months ago

They are ok?! How? First there was never a vax useful or harmless unless it was an antidote for snake’ bite. Anyone know this who took time to investigate the history of them. They eradicated nothing. All of the so feared illnesses disappeared or affected less with the change of our living conditions. Happened before the mass vaccinations.
They are poisons, always were, always will be. The only difference among them that how deadly they are on the short term. Their value is to create life long patients to the Big Pharma and a silent slow population reduction. Just in my family and pets I can tell several life long adverse effects, maybe not deadly but a life long ruin to the quality of our lives. They hurt DNA and that became inheritable.

But don’t believe me, put time to investigate.
For a start:

Then read the book of Eleanor McBean: The Poisoned Needle. It’s unique because not a re-written history on wiki but a documentary based on thousands and thousands notes of our ancestors, military docs, hospital docs and so on.
http://whale.to/a/mcbean3.html

Cram
Cram
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I just watched this whole video, thank you, it is mind boggling. It makes so much sense. I think it also helps to clear up what we are seeing now. Scary stuff! Highly recommended.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  abrogard
10 months ago

They are ok?! How? First there was never a vax useful or harmless unless it was an antidote for snake’ bite. Anyone know this who took time to investigate the history of them. They eradicated nothing. All of the so feared illnesses disappeared or affected less with the change of our living conditions. Happened before the mass vaccinations.
They are poisons, always were, always will be. The only difference among them that how deadly they are on the short term. Their value is to create life long patients to the Big Pharma and a silent slow population reduction. Just in my family and pets I can tell several life long adverse effects, maybe not deadly but a life long ruin to the quality of our lives. They hurt DNA and that became inheritable.
But don’t believe me, put time to investigate.
For a start:

Then read the book of Eleanor McBean: The Poisoned Needle. It’s unique because not a re-written history on wiki but a documentary based on thousands and thousands notes of our ancestors, military docs, hospital docs and so on.

Duckduck: whale.to The Poisoned Needle. Free to read.

abrogard
abrogard
10 months ago

Strikes me as peculiar that the same thing should happen across two different vaccines. Unless you want to argue it always happens in all vaccine manufacture. But I thought what happened in all ‘drug’ manufacture was no errors.

Clara
Clara
Reply to  abrogard
10 months ago

That struck me as extremely odd as well. If it is the result of poor quality control, why would approximately the same percentage be affected at both Pfizer and Moderna?

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Clara
10 months ago

The Moderna figures for deaths are 0,1,2,3 per lot. They show a totally normal exponential fall off. The Pfizer figures have the extra bump after the fall off has completed, which contains the deaths of some 2340 people which is in blatant addition to the normal exponential fall off and has death numbers up to 100 ! That is the manufacturing screw up. Don’t forget that VAERS is underreported by at least 10x. So we are talking about 23,400 deaths due to manufacturing negligence or perhaps something worse. That is 8x the deaths of 911. Then there are 162,000 adverse events due to the bump underneath the red arrow. These would correspond to 1,620,000 people suffering some kind of reaction. I agree with Dr Yeadon. Any company or administration or healthcare system or police force interested in saving lives should suspend all vaccinations with PFIZER ONLY, until the precise cause of this problem is identified. And if it cannot be identified then all unused Pfizer lots should be destroyed. How many other dodgy lots are out there all over the world right now being injected into people?

FedUpWithBS
FedUpWithBS
10 months ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures exist. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://health.p0l.org

dave B
dave B
Reply to  FedUpWithBS
10 months ago

I just can’t understand this.

I have worked for 30years in the food industry as a forensic analytical chemist.

All “complaints” on products are logged against the “batch code” on the packaging.

If we got 100 serious complaints from a production run of say 20,000 units all hell would automatically break loose. Resulting in tracking were all the other units went to so that they could recalled.

These systems need to be in place and demonstrated to work to pass retailer audits.

SteelAlbanian
SteelAlbanian
10 months ago

Great Expose – I read/heard that vials were given different levels of the drug (can’t remember where) in steps between 5 and 100 Micrograms

trackback
10 months ago

[…] “100% of Covid vaccine deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Go… – “An investigation of data found in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the U.S. has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified,” reports the Exposé. […]

Bill Dyszel
Bill Dyszel
10 months ago

Cold chain failure? These products must be stored with great care at extraordinarily low temperatures. Did errors in handling cause certain lots of the product to get too warm and spoil?

Last edited 10 months ago by Bill Dyszel
Lynn
Lynn
10 months ago

don’t believe it.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Below is an article that appeared in The Expose on October 31, 2021. […]

tyranthunta
tyranthunta
10 months ago

profit the lockstep. no notice of recall. bad batches part of the trial program. liability-free. centralized global data collection. biowarfare. psyop. mainstream media-virtual reality. the cake is a trap. wwiii.
#protectyaneck

Nick
Nick
10 months ago

The simple reason why some lots are more dangerous than others is because the lots which are dangerous have a high amount of Vials which contain real vaccines and a small amount of vials which contain saline and the lots which are less dangerous have a low amount of real vaccines and high amount of saline shots

tye
tye
Reply to  Nick
10 months ago

This is backed up by the multiple examinations that have been conducted on ‘vaccine’ batches – where they have been shown to contain different ‘ingredients’. One of hundreds of proven facts, any one of which should make you never again trust the drug dealers, the serial killer jabbers, or the ‘government’.

thoth rogers
thoth rogers
Reply to  Nick
9 months ago

any data/sources to support such intra-lot variability?

a friend was coerced into “treatment” and lot # is not pretty .. no immediate symptoms or problems though (~5 months span).

Low Voltage
Low Voltage
10 months ago

It doesn’t make any sense that 5% of the vaccines were widely distributed and 95% were sent to only a few locations.

the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.

tye
tye
Reply to  Low Voltage
10 months ago

“whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.”

To the states that made the highest donations to the ‘biden’ ‘campaign funds’.

dave B
dave B
Reply to  Low Voltage
10 months ago

I don’t believe it now either.

Batches never get spread out like that unless they are deliberately shuffled at one central distribution point.

I have a lot of experience on product recall of batches

A key piece of missing data.

Are the dates of vaccination of each of these rogue batches temporally scattered around as well as geographically ?

Sometimes, in bad systems, a batch number can actually be some kind of stock rotation number which can be cross referenced back in documentation to a manufacturers “real” batch number

thoth rogers
thoth rogers
Reply to  dave B
9 months ago

unless they are deliberately shuffled at one central distribution point”

precisely the point, it appears almost certainly deliberate as no compelling alternative hypothesis exists.

just as deliberately, the clean lots were carefully sent to specific places where assurance was needed for elites, etc to not be murdered/injured.

fxrckvlsibnhasdtto
fxrckvlsibnhasdtto
Reply to  Low Voltage
10 months ago

It’s not saying that 95% of batches produced. It’s saying 95% of batches reported to VAERS. A ‘benign’ batch is less likely to get reported since it’s, well, benign.

Last edited 10 months ago by fxrckvlsibnhasdtto
trackback
10 months ago

[…] analysis of VAERS has revealed that there are certain lots of Covid vaccines that have caused significantly more adverse effects than […]

desiree stokkel
desiree stokkel
10 months ago
Edward Hendrie
Edward Hendrie
10 months ago

The fact that the vaccine companies distributed the more deadly batches differently from the more benign batches means that the companies knew that those deadly batches were distinctly different before distribution. That means that it was planned out in advance to distribute widely the death and hospitalizations from the COVID-19 vaccines. This proves intent!

tye
tye
Reply to  Edward Hendrie
10 months ago

“This proves intent”

Proves it to who? A ‘judge’? Good luck with that.

roberto
roberto
10 months ago

delinquenti

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Read and share – ‘EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the ba… […]

VaxRemorse
VaxRemorse
10 months ago

I have checked the VAERS data myself, and find the tables to be lacking a few lot numbers (lots that I myself had taken: EW0170 & EW0150) that were distributed in many states and have high AE that are not listed in the article; this article is incomplete

I had taken the shots at a mass vaccination site, perhaps these widely distributed shots yielded more AE and deaths because of quantity of shots given compared to smaller lots for individual states? I haven’t been able to find the production quantity for the lots

Bill
Bill
10 months ago

Thanks for the great investigative work. Unfortunately I check my vaccine card and I received the Moderna lot 039K20A. I received this on December 28,2020 in Long Island, Ny approximately 25 miles East of NYC.
The group which received this lot were medical staff, EMT’s, and Firefighters. Thanks again and I’ll be passing this information to people who were there.

Montrese
Montrese
10 months ago

Can you plz list the states that received the bad lots!!!!!?

John C
John C
10 months ago

Hypothesis:

The lots which were concentrated in one area went to mass vaccinations clinics, which would be mostly used by people with no regular family doctor/clinic. When these people get an adverse event,they go to an ER and the busy attending physician is extremely unlikely to spend the time to file a VAERS report.

The lots which were more geographically distributed were broken up to distribute to family practices and smaller clinics, where it is much more likely the physician has a relationship with the patient and is willing to spend the time on a VAERS report.

So possibly more of a variability in reporting likelihood than in quality of the lots.

tye
tye
Reply to  John C
10 months ago

You wouldn’t want to get the low quality poison.

Granny gear
Granny gear
10 months ago

A lot of the mRNA consists of approximately 6000 doses however I don’t see what a typical lot size is fit the influenza vaccines. That would be relevant if you are comparing the two. 26 deaths for one lot , but what is the lot size?

K. Dopp
K. Dopp
10 months ago

I would like to know what the pattern of states is? I.e., are the States being distributed the safer Pfizer lot numbers different from the US states being distributed the more dangerous lots? I.e., is there a political or other difference in the states being distributed the safer lot numbers?

Kathy Ballantyne
Kathy Ballantyne
10 months ago

This is horrific if true.

Sharron
Sharron
10 months ago

This is such useful data. It’s the facts printed for easy use. I’ve been searching for this information for J&J. Does anyone know how to locate this type data for the J&J? My mother is having strokes after taking the J&J. She was perfectly healthy, then BAMB! I appreciate anyone posting the J&J info.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

Jorge
Jorge
10 months ago

This is worth nil, since the passive surveillance systems like VAERS get less than 1% of the real issues, and now they are “discouraging” everyone from reporting, to put it mildly. Stinks to damage control and disinfo to kingdom come. QA issues my A**

trackback
10 months ago

[…] October 31, 2021EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced accordi… […]

NBS
NBS
10 months ago

Good analysis for sure. Raises so, so many other questions: like, given the 6-hour active shelf life for the vials, how many doses in each batch were thrown away, and how was this distributed by lot? Would this account for some of this concentration of AEs? In other words, did the lots with low numbers of AEs have large numbers of wasted doses? Also, do the reports of metals (elemental spectroscopic tests) and microscopic examinations showing what appear to be pond-type microorganisms coincide with high-AE batches?

With the frantic rush to make and distribute billions of doses of these “vaccines”, shoddy QC is hardly a surprise given the poor record of Big Pharma.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

1 2 3 5