Breaking News

EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.



The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.

The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .

The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.

The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.

Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.

The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.

The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.

The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.

The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.

All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.

The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.

This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).

The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.

Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.

The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.

This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.

The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.

The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.

Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.

This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.

Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.

The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.

Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.

The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA

As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.

However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.

This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.

The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.

The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.

Conclusion

This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.

The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.

One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.

Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.

But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.

Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?

Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?

Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?

Could this just be a quality control issue?

A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.

Share this page to Telegram
4.9 28 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

276 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
HonkHonk
HonkHonk
1 year ago

It seems you didn’t count blank lot numbers, is this correct?

Rose
Rose
1 year ago

Likely directed in early release to elderly:

This report shows 336,000 injuries occurred before March 31 with the CDC massively backloading data and withholding submission dates. They targeted the elderly with Midazolam and morphine,

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/covid-19-treatment-dnrs-attributed-to-early-death-clusters-in-care-homes-hospitalized-others

and this was (mostly) a period when the vaccine was restricted to elderly population so it was likely a continuation of their early protocol against our seniors:

https://www.unite4truth.com/post/2-400-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-occurred-in-first-six-weeks-of-program-cdc-back-loading-data

Also, they changed the STORAGE TEMPERATURES IN MIDDLE OF FEBRUARY – they said it was for easier logistics but that makes no sense because if the vaccines needed to be stored at a certain temperature for viability, logistics wouldn’t be a factor – they might have just raised the temperatures after they did their early sweep of elderly vaccinations and neutralized whatever harmful ingredient was inducing early deaths (remember the spike in care home deaths)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-pfizer-idUSKBN2AJ1CJ

Last edited 1 year ago by Rose
el Gallinazo
el Gallinazo
Reply to  Rose
1 year ago

VAERS is a USA system and midazolam, while an FDA approved drug, is not used as part of the CDC official cv-1984 protocol for ICU doctors. In the USA, they use Remdesivir in its place, which kills patients with kidney failure leading to extreme pulmonary edema. The advantage to remdesivir over midazolam is it is on patent and cost the patients or their insurance carriers about 500 times more.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

Patsy Cash
Patsy Cash
1 year ago

I received the Pfizer lot # EK9321

desiree stokkel
desiree stokkel
1 year ago

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covid19-death-rates-us-by-state/

I try of get some DATA from CIA, about ‘Number of covid Deaths per State in USA… on command of Whitehouse’.

In NL , I start with National Security.
Perhaps Missing Children in Rotterdam were used for KNAW – Erasmusmc ‘gain of function’ program

= test Lab-made virus on Stolen Children + mRNA tests on Kids + Vaccin tests + send Kids around the world for Start Worldwar3 / Vaccin-genocide.

Neal
Neal
1 year ago

Proof people of the the world are considered experimental lab rats.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] I dati utilizzati per lo studio provengono dal database VAERS accessibile al pubblico, il qui può essere visualizzato. Il Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) è un programma statunitense per la sicurezza dei vaccini amministrato congiuntamente dai Centri statunitensi per il controllo e la prevenzione delle malattie (CDC) e dalla Food and Drug Administration (FDA). fonte […]

Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
1 year ago

We can do two paths of further study:
1) see what states got the bad lots first. Were the lots distributed after a certain number of adverse events were reported in the first few states?

2) Is there a different pattern of adverse events or causes of deaths in the bad lots vs. the overall average?

I’ll take a whack at these questions if I don’t see that anyone else has in the next couple of days.

Kat Stevens
Kat Stevens
Reply to  Grouchy Math Grad
1 year ago

Already done by Karl Denninger: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109

Xavier Figueroa
Xavier Figueroa
Reply to  Kat Stevens
1 year ago

Thank you, Kat. Great piece by Karl Denninger and corroborates what the Expose found in terms of “hot lots”.

Grouchy Math Grad
Grouchy Math Grad
Reply to  Kat Stevens
1 year ago

He just looked at the average age of death for the worst lot of Pfizer and of another bad lot of Pfizer.
He found the average age of death was 51.5 for 039K20A (the worst – 87 deaths by his count), and 61.1 for 030A21A (30 deaths).

He also noted the Jansen shots had the same weird distribution of deaths by lot number.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Die für die Untersuchung verwendeten Daten stammen aus der öffentlich zugänglichen VAERS-Datenbank, die hier eingesehen werden kann. Das Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) ist ein US-amerikanisches Programm für Impfstoffsicherheit, das gemeinsam von den U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) und der Food and Drug Administration (FDA) verwaltet wird. Quelle […]

Gina Maria
Gina Maria
1 year ago

Interesting finds! Several thoughts come to mind as follows: Under reporting of adverse effects is known to exist because of the timely nature of completing the paperwork by doctors and individuals. Given the fact that it appears to be predictable in certain lots, this means lots can be made to target groups such as the vaxx resistant. Based on this data, I wouldn’t trust doses being given now as those getting vaxxed under the pressure of employment are likely getting a “bad batch” and could account for the reason it’s not being pushed on the migrant non citizens infiltrating the US!

Robert
Robert
1 year ago

meaning they’re libel for intending to do harm.

Beeb Beeeb
Beeb Beeeb
1 year ago

Which states???

trackback
1 year ago

[…] 1:17 Tim notes that there is a big difference batch to batch…could that have something to do with this?  Are some people being given placebo’s? Who […]

Lemmings on Parade
Lemmings on Parade
1 year ago

Does anyone have any idea what dataset they used for the flu vaccine baseline here?

Was this a year over year comparison or a total # of shots comparison?
Year over year comparison results in a HUGH mismatch since the number of flu vaccines given each year is vastly lower than the number of COVID jabs.

All that said, the COVID shot numbers are very interesting to say the least even without the baseline from the flu vaccine.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot […]

el Gallinazo
el Gallinazo
1 year ago

This article, which is potentially of earthshaking importance, only has your conclusions but not the raw data, especially the specific lot numbers of ‘problem’ batches. This should have been included as a downloadable pdf file for those of us capable to do our own statistical analysis of the data and see how it corresponds to the VAERS raw data. Without independent verification, this piece could simply be a set-up by the oligarchs to invalidate the anti cv-1984 vax movement or even a donation raising gimmick.

If this article is accurate and valid and not a set-up, I would say that the oligarchs used these specific batches to check the lethality of the product which will be gradually released in increasing amounts in the ‘boosters.’ The old boil the frog technique.

Once again with the validity caveat, I imagine that the only way which the oligarchs and their evil ‘scientists’ could verify the lethality of the special batches would be via the VAERS reports which must include the batch numbers. I am surprised however that VAERS did not keep the real reports confidential and publish a fake public report with randomized batch numbers. Hubris comes before a fall.

Truth Warrior
Truth Warrior
Reply to  el Gallinazo
1 year ago

Anyone can go into VAERS and download the raw data.

vondago
vondago
1 year ago

What states have the bad batches of Vaccine been set too?

anna macree
anna macree
Reply to  vondago
1 year ago

some batches were sent to california because only recently cali stopped using some of the batches it received due to a high adverse reaction problem-but then again why not take a massive leap and suggest that all the non democratic states have been the ones to receive the most poisonous poison

thelibcommie
thelibcommie
Reply to  vondago
1 year ago

Using the official VAERS site (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html – remember to click “I Agree” button, at bottom of page) to see what states got the vaccine lots, here are the abridged adverse event percentages:

EK9231: Unknown 11.65%, Michigan (D) 8.2%, Pennsylvania (D) 7.56%, Minnesota (D) 6.58%, North Carolina (R) 5.68%, etc, with Florida (R) 3.4%

039K20A: Unknown 31.38%, Florida (R) 15.58%, Virginia (D) 8.08%, Indiana (R) 6.37%, New York (D) 4.68%

041L20A: California (D) 23.57%, Texas (R) 17.63%, Unknown 8.47%, Oregon (D) 7.29%, Arizona (D): 4.66%, Washington (D) 4.44%

Based on these results, it appears largely that EVERYONE is being targeted, regardless of their political persuasion.

Whiskey
Whiskey
1 year ago

The Stew Peters Show covered your article here: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/11/vaers-reveals-death-by-lot-number-specific-states-get-certain-vials/

And, in video: https://tv.gab.com/channel/realstewpeters/view/vaers-reveals-death-by-lot-number-618043ad79fddabeff768f34

Dr. Jane Ruby, who was speaking in the video, said that she tried to contact The Exposé team to get more information on which lots went to which states. She was concerned that there might be some political motivation here (i.e. that red/conservative states, which have differing ideology than the establishment might have ended up, perhaps not by chance, with more deadly batches). I’d love to see a follow-up to this article, breaking it down — which states got which batches, which areas of which states (if that information is available), etc.

I also didn’t see a link to your article on their site. It would be nice if you asked them to add it. I think they should’ve added it, themselves. You deserve credit for the work you’ve done.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Dati šai izmeklēšanai tika iegūti no VAERS datu bāzes, kas ir ASV programma dažādu blakņu ziņošanai par vakcīnām. Tā vāc informāciju no ārstiem, medmāsām un pašiem pacientiem, lai noskaidrotu, vai tiešām riska-labuma faktors attaisno kādas vakcīnas lietošanu. […]

InquiringMinds
InquiringMinds
1 year ago

Which states did the “good” batches go to? Does anyone know?

thelibcommie
thelibcommie
Reply to  InquiringMinds
1 year ago

Using the official VAERS site (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html – remember to click “I Agree” button, at bottom of page) to see what states got the vaccine lots, here are the abridged adverse event percentages:

EK9231: Unknown 11.65%, Michigan (D) 8.2%, Pennsylvania (D) 7.56%, Minnesota (D) 6.58%, North Carolina (R) 5.68%, etc, with Florida (R) 3.4%

039K20A: Unknown 31.38%, Florida (R) 15.58%, Virginia (D) 8.08%, Indiana (R) 6.37%, New York (D) 4.68%

041L20A: California (D) 23.57%, Texas (R) 17.63%, Unknown 8.47%, Oregon (D) 7.29%, Arizona (D): 4.66%, Washington (D) 4.44%

Based on these results, it appears largely that EVERYONE is being targeted, regardless of their political persuasion.

Christina
Christina
1 year ago

What are the 13 states???

thelibcommie
thelibcommie
Reply to  Christina
1 year ago

Using the official VAERS site (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html – remember to click “I Agree” button, at bottom of page) to see what states got the vaccine lots, here are the abridged adverse event percentages:

EK9231: Unknown 11.65%, Michigan (D) 8.2%, Pennsylvania (D) 7.56%, Minnesota (D) 6.58%, North Carolina (R) 5.68%, etc, with Florida (R) 3.4%

039K20A: Unknown 31.38%, Florida (R) 15.58%, Virginia (D) 8.08%, Indiana (R) 6.37%, New York (D) 4.68%

041L20A: California (D) 23.57%, Texas (R) 17.63%, Unknown 8.47%, Oregon (D) 7.29%, Arizona (D): 4.66%, Washington (D) 4.44%

Based on these results, it appears largely that EVERYONE is being targeted, regardless of their political persuasion.

Gus
Gus
1 year ago

What a clever way to cull humanity. Billy Gate$ wet dream.

The Mysterious One
The Mysterious One
1 year ago

Most people in here are missing the point. It isn’t a question of where the lots went to. The smoking gun is the bad lots were mixed up into many states. They didn’t take the trouble to mix up the bad lots into other states. So how did they know to mix up the bad lots?

anna macree
anna macree
Reply to  The Mysterious One
1 year ago

Because the worldwide CENSUS is managed by the military industrial complex they have all the data to track and trace everyone who fills out those forms truthfully-they know your name-how many live in your household-their ages-etc and it all goes onto a central computer-so they know exactly who lives where and they get allocated a lot number-the military also have massive contracts with pfizer and moderna and millions of dollars have been given to these corporationsby the US military-Darpa-NIH etc to produce and distribute the deadly poison around the world-its all their on line for everyone to see.

democracy is coming
democracy is coming
1 year ago

signs for tomorrow- pureblooded soundtrack in the background?

You’re not safe, just further down the hit list.

First the Mask, then the Jab, then the Chip (photo of Borg)

You’ve been complying? How’s that worked out?

One Jab, Two Jabs, Three Jabs, More Jabs. (Dr Seuss photo)

Standing, Kneeling, Complicit or War Criminal–Time to choose

Slavery took a 100-year nap. It’s back!

Resistance IS NOT FUTILE! We will NOT be assimilated (photo of the Borg Queen

Teaching a child that his breath can kill grandma is terrorism and child abuse.

War Criminals Swing! Never Forget.
‘Just following orders’ didn’t work at Nuremberg.

Public-Private Partnership is the definition of Fascism!

Why did the FDA and CDC need to purchase 150 thousand rounds of armor-piercing bullets? This could be your ‘next shot’.

Don’t turn your kids into GMOs.

Who has Jeffrey Epstein’s video collection? Whoever has it now controls the world.

Winter IS Coming!

My advice as a prepper-educator: If you are un-jabbed, get food, water, and shelter backups ready. If you are jabbed, it’s simpler. Just work on your will and estate plans.

The wonders of re-definition: A ‘case’ is now a totally well person. What was a cold and flu season is now a “Pandemic”.
Upset parents are now ‘domestic terrorists’. Slavery is now ‘Protection’.

Government: made of two parts, ‘govern’ meaning to control, and ‘ment’ as in mental, meaning the mind. You were warned!

trackback
1 year ago

[…] is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot […]

Pants on Fire
Pants on Fire
1 year ago

There are NOT anywhere near 5000 “lots” of either Pfizer or Moderna. Covid vaccine “lot” sizes differ greatly from other vaccines and Pfizer reported their batches would be 1 to 3 million doses per “lot”.

It appears this “study” simply called every typo, mispelling, input error and/or misread in the Lot # input field as a separate “lot”. I downloaded the data and filtered/sorted out the data in similar fashions and it’s apparent that:

  1. Lot #’s were more reliably reported and input on VAER death reports whereas the thousands more “adverse events” were all over the map with their mistakes;
  2. The 2908 “lots” of Pfizer and 4685 “lots” of Moderna where there was just one (or 1-5) Adverse Events were all simply typos, mistakes and/or input errors;
  3. Over 200,000 adverse events (108,000+ Moderna and 109,000+ Pfizer are unaccounted for, probably because the Lot#’s were blank; and,
  4. I believe the authors KNEW they were fudging lot #’s, for example, they combined the 4 most prominent of 72 separate but very similar rows of “lot #” totals to come up with the total 4,967 Moderna Lot “039K20A” adverse events (which they later claimed was just “over 4,000 total adverse events).

Here’s the breakdown on Moderna Lot 039K20A and a few of it’s variations:
a. 039K20A – 4064 adverse events
b. 039k20a – 604
c. 039k20A- 212
d. 039KZ0ZA – 87
Total = 4,967 adverse events as indicated

Accordingly, all comparisons between flu vaccine “lots” and covid vaccine “lots” are completely non-correlating. Further, all real Covid vaccine lots, comprised of millions of doses, were distributed widely to more than 12 states…there were no “small safer lots” that I could identify. The 100 or so deaths attributed to small “lots” are, I’m guessing, just a few common typos that occurred in just a few separate states.

I’d like to see their underlying data and spreadsheets but you can go to VAERS and make your own. Don’t take their word or my word for it.

Godspeed

Anonymous
Anonymous
Reply to  Pants on Fire
1 year ago

Yeah people should do their own research on this. Also since VAERS is a passive system, this could simply be showing that for whatever reason, certain lots result in more people reporting deaths/adverse reactions as opposed to those lots actually representing more deaths/adverse reactions. There could be, certain hospitals or what not that are more responsible when it comes to entering VAERS data. Just ‘sayin.

striketheroot
striketheroot
1 year ago

Ok Ok it was a bad batch, our bad but now everything is cool. Go ahead take the shot it’s really really safe now – really!

Last edited 1 year ago by striketheroot
trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” are […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” are deadlier than others. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of […]

Welcometheeagle88
Welcometheeagle88
1 year ago

I really appreciate your article! Hopefully we can do some work together in the future. Please reach out if interested. Here is a quick analysis of your analysis. Lol. My full audit will be coming shortly. https://www.bitchute.com/video/emYod3h6kAO4/

trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” are […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” are […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Una nueva investigación ha descubierto datos que muestran que ciertos lotes de «vacunación» del coronavirus de Wuhan (Covid-19) son más mortales que otros. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] News) A new investigation has uncovered data showing that certain lots of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” […]