Breaking News

Only the Fully Vaccinated should fear the New “Worst Ever” Covid-19 Variant; data shows they already account for 4 in every 5 Covid Deaths

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

With the emergence of an alleged new variant that the UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid said “may evade the current vaccines”, despite also saying “that is why you should get your boosters” in the same sentence, we felt it was best to take you on a journey through three months worth of UKHSA Covid-19 data to show you why, if the rumours are true, the unvaccinated population have absolutely nothing to worry about, but the vaccinated population have everything to fear.

You’ve most likely been seeing headlines like ‘Worst Ever Covid Variant’ in the mainstream media, such as this one from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funded newspaper ‘The Guardian’.

But we doubt the same mainstream media, trying to once again frighten the nation into compliance with inevitable Draconian restrictions, has informed you that this alleged new variant was first discovered among four individuals, each of them fully vaccinated.

Current trends suggest that the unvaccinated will no doubt be blamed for the emergence of this new variant, and the onslaught of propaganda designed to sway the nation into supporting a lockdown of the unvaccinated will probably now pick up pace.

But is this justified?

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publish a weekly ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status across England over the past four weeks.

Their latest report, published Thursday November 25th covers data on infections, hospitalisations and deaths from Week 43 to Week 46 of 2021 (October 25th – November 21st).

The report reveals that there were 833,332 recorded Covid-19 cases, 9,094 Covid-19 hospitalisations and 3,700 Covid-19 deaths from October 25th to November 21st. Of these the unvaccinated accounted for 39% of all cases, 34% of all hospitalisations, and 19% of all deaths. Whilst the vaccinated accounted for 61% of all cases, 66% of all hospitalisations, and 81% of all deaths.

But a more detailed look at three months worth of Covid-19 data published by the agency reveals that projections show the fully vaccinated were already in for a very rough winter prior to the alleged emergence of the “worst ever” Covid-19 variant. Infections rates are already much higher among the fully vaccinated, and the case-fatality rate is frighteningly worse than what is being seen among the unvaccinated population.

We used the following reports for our analysis –

Covid-19 Cases

The following chart shows the total number of cases over four week periods from August 30th to November 21st 2021 as per table 8 of the Vaccine Surveillance reports.

The chart reveals that things are improving for the unvaccinated population in terms of cases whilst they are getting worse for the fully vaccinated population.

The unvaccinated accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases between both week 35-38 and week 39-42. But the most recent four weeks have seen a significant switch with the unvaccinated cases declining by nearly 100,000 cases from week 39-42, whilst the fully vaccinated cases increased by around 53,000.

It’s also worth noting that a steady increase has been recorded amongst the partly vaccinated population over the past three months, and the reason for this is that children, who are currently only eligible for a single dose, are still catching Covid-19.

This is despite Professor Chris Whitty the Chief Medical Officer for England claiming he was overruling the JCVI because the jab would help in preventing further disruption to the education of children.

We knew this was a lie at the time because the jabs cannot and do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus, but now we have the evidence to confirm it.

The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases over the past three months by vaccination status as well as the projected number of cases per week up to the 2nd week of January 2022 based on the current trend.

As things stand there were 1,067,859 Covid-19 cases among the unvaccinated population between Oct 25th and November 21st, with projections showing cases could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 2.5 million by the second week of January 2022 among the unvaccinated.

But there are far more cases among the fully vaccinated population, with 1,108,306 cases being recorded between Oct 25th and Nov 21st, and projections show cases could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 4.8 million by the second week of January.

This chart proves that even without the alleged new variant we were already going to see a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’ this winter.

Covid-19 Hospitalisations

The following chart shows the total number of hospitalisations over four week periods from August 30th to November 21st 2021 as per table 9 of the Vaccine Surveillance reports.

The chart shows that hospitalisations among the unvaccinated have floated around the 3,000 mark over four week periods throughout the past three months.

But unfortunately for the fully vaccinated population, hospitalisations among this group have been getting progressively worse by the month.

The number of hospitalisations among the fully vaccinated between week 43 and 46 is 30% higher than the number of hospitalisations among the fully vaccinated between week 35 and 38. Whereas the number of hospitalisations among the unvaccinated between week 43 and 46 is just 5% higher than the number recorded between week 35 and 38.

This shows that the fully vaccinated are currently the biggest burden on the NHS, not the unvaccinated, and it also shows us something peculiar in terms of the overall picture considering the vaccines are supposed to reduce the risk of hospitalisation.

In all there were 1,067,859 cases among the unvaccinated between August 30th and November 21st. Therefore, with a total of 8,825 hospitalisations, the case-hospitalisation rate among the unvaccinated is 0.82%.

However, with 1,108,306 cases among the vaccination population during the same time frame, and 15,191 hospitalisations, the case-hospitalisation rate among the fully vaccinated is 1.37%.

Therefore, the case-hospitalisation rate among the fully vaccinated is 67% higher than the case-hospitalisation rate among the unvaccinated. Should this be the case when the Covid-19 injections are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation by up to 95%?

The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations over the past three months by vaccination status as well as the projected number of hospitalisations up to the second week of 2022, and yet again things aren’t looking promising for the fully vaccinated.

Hospitalisations are projected to rapidly rise to an accumulative total of approximately 67,500 among the fully vaccinated, an increase of 52,309. Whilst the projected number of hospitalisations among the unvaccinated is expected to rise to approximately 17,500 , an increase of 8,675.

The vaccinated have currently accounted for 64% of hospitalisations since August 30th, but from November 21st to the second week of 2022 they are projected to account for 86% of hospitalisations, meaning they may have accounted for 80% of hospitalisations since August 30th by the time new year resolutions have gone out the window.

Covid-19 Deaths

The following chart shows the total number of deaths over four week periods from August 30th to November 21st 2021 as per table 10 of the Vaccine Surveillance reports.

From August 30th to November 21st, England recorded a total of 9,592 deaths. Of these just 1,882 were among the unvaccinated population, whilst a shocking 7,710 were among the vaccinated population, with nearly 3,000 of these deaths occurring in just the last four weeks.

Does this make sense to you when the fully vaccinated account for only 47% of cases and the vaccines are alleged to reduce the risk of death by 95%?

The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths over the past three months by vaccination status as well as the projected number of deaths up to the second week of 2022, and things are looking disastrous for the fully vaccinated population.

Deaths are projected to rapidly rise to an accumulative total of approximately 34,000 among the fully vaccinated, an increase of 26,574. Whilst the projected number of deaths among the unvaccinated is expected to rise to just 4,500, an increase of 2,618.

Covid-19 Case / Hospitalisation / Fatality Rates

The above chart shows the total number of Covid-19 hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status and allows us to compare the numbers side by side. What this clearly demonstrates is that there is a much higher hospitalisation-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated and partly vaccinated populations than the rate among the unvaccinated population.

In all there were 8,825 hospitalisations and 1,882 deaths among the unvaccinated between August 30th and November 21st. Therefore, the hospitalisation-fatality rate is 21.3%.

But with 15.191 hospitalisations and 7,426 deaths among the fully vaccinated population population the hospitalisation-fatality rate is 48.88%.

This means the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population over the past three months has been 130% higher than the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the unvaccinated population.

The above chart shows the case-hospitalisation rate (No. Cases / No. Hosp.), case-fatality rate (No. Cases / No. Deaths), and hospitalisation fatality rate (No. Hosp / No. Deaths) by vaccination status.

It’s quite concerning to find that all three rates are much higher among the vaccinated population, we should surely be seeing the opposite if the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death?

But unfortunately the above figures do not just suggest that the vaccines are ineffective, they actually suggest that they make the recipient worse.

A vaccine effectiveness of +95% against death from Covid-19 would mean that the unvaccinated population have a 95% higher chance of dying if infected with Covid-19 than the vaccinated.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the vaccines are ineffective and the vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same chance of dying if infected with Covid-19.

But a vaccine effectiveness of -95% would mean that the vaccines actually make the recipient worse, by for example decimating the recipients immune system, or invoking a response such as antibody-dependent-enhancement. Which makes the following figures extremely concerning.

The above chart shows the current increased risk of hospitalisation if infected with Covid-19, the current increased risk of death if infected with Covid-19, and the current increased risk of death if hospitalised with Covid-19, among the fully vaccinated population. The percentages have been calculated based on the ‘Rates by Vaccination Status’ calculated in the previous chart.

The chart shows that the fully vaccinated are 67% more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 if infected, therefore this shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -67% against hospitalisation.

But the most concerning figure demonstrated on the above chart shows that the fully vaccinated are 294% more likely to die with Covid-19 if infected. This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -294% against death.

Why?

The reason the fully vaccinated are actually suffering far worse than the unvaccinated, and are projected to suffer worse still, could have something to do with the fact that the data suggests the Covid-19 injections are decimating the immune systems of the vaccinated, as we demonstrated in a previous article published Tuesday November 16th which can be viewed here.

The case rates per 100,000 population contained in the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance reports show that the fully vaccinated 30 to 79 year-olds have a much higher case rate than the unvaccinated population, and things are getting progressively worse by the month.

This means the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness, and this unfortunately suggests that they are decimating the fully vaccinated populations immune systems, and we are seeing further evidence of this hidden in official government reports.

For instance, the Week 42 Vaccine Surveillance report published by the UKHSA states the following –

“Recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.”

What this means is that the Covid-19 vaccines interfere with the immune systems ability to produce antibodies against other pieces of the SARS-CoV-2 virus following infection, in the case of the N antibody this is against the nucleocapsid protein which is the shell of the virus, and a crucial part of the immune system response in the unvaccinated population.

Therefore, if any mutations to the spike protein of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus occur in the future, the vaccinated will be far more vulnerable and possibly unprotected due to their inability to produce the N antibody, even if they have already been infected and recovered from Covid-19.

Whereas the unvaccinated would have much better immunity to any mutations due to their ability to produce both S and N antibodies after infection.

What do we know?

The new “worst ever” variant is called B.1.1.529 and is allegedly incredibly, heavily mutated.

Professor Tulio de Oliveira, the director of the Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation in South Africa, said there was an “unusual constellation of mutations” and that it was “very different” to other variants that have circulated.

“This variant did surprise us, it has a big jump on evolution [and] many more mutations than we expected,” he said.

In a media briefing Professor de Oliveira said there were 50 mutations overall and more than 30 on the spike protein, which is the target of the Covid-19 vaccines and now the only part of the Covid-19 virus that the fully vaccinated are able to produce antibodies against, as confirmed in the UKHSA report.

Therefore, –  with 80% of deaths, 65% of hospitalisations, and 54% of cases being among the partly and fully vaccinated population since at least August 30th, proving England is experiencing a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’, and the vaccinated populations inability to produce the N antibody because of the vaccines only targeting the spike protein – the unvaccinated population have absolutely nothing to worry about, but the vaccinated population have everything to fear in regard to the new “worst ever” Covid-19 variant.

Share this page to Telegram
3.3 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cynthia
Cynthia

[ Work at Home ] I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 1 year ago by Cynthia
Jules
Jules

Just need to point out your second article with heading BREAKING re fiddling with the figures….They don’t like this at all as page came up with ERROR…Thought you should know. Also the sound still does not work for me….I am pretty sure it is not my end. It says ‘working on it’ but nothing happens. Thought you should know that one too, also its been like this for yonks. All the best. Love what you are doing and appreciate true journalism. All the very best to you and yours. Jules

Hoddy
Hoddy
1 year ago

Omicron is Moronic.

Diane
Diane
Reply to  Hoddy
1 year ago

Everybody can earn $500 Daily… Yes! you can earn more than you think by working online from home. I have been doing this job for like a ADt few weeks and my last week payment was exactly 2537 dollars.

See More Info….. http://Www.Paycash1.com

Last edited 1 year ago by Diane
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 year ago

The 4 who were tested and found to have the latest strain were all fully vaccinated with Covid-19 vaccines, so presumably, they are “safe” though what from, remains to be seen.
While the world depends on vaccines, there is never going to be any way out of this pandemic of each “new” Covid, after the next one, or the numbers who have to die or be severely damaged from the vaccines themselves – because, in my opinion, the only way out of this pandemic is to kill off the virus, or Coronavirus, before it is allowed to become Covid some 20 days after the initial nasal infection.
With this in mind I refer to my Twitter blog at RichardNoakes19 where you can find details of my free cure for the virus, any virus, or Coronavirus, while it is in its infancy and totally vulnerable to my simple, free, cure.
If you are motivated to and believe in vaccines, then I am also very thankful for your choice and willingness to be an experiment for Big Pharma and what their vaccines “seem” to be doing to the majority, just like you.
A thought in passing for both the Big 4’s vaccines and the pills and their ARR efficiency, where 100% effectiveness, is regarded as 100% safe, from treatments, which I believe my simple cure to be:

The article continues: “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
“However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
The Lancet Study
Doctors for COVID Ethics
On The accompanying chart:
Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03% ARR From Jab 0.84%
Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08% ARR 1.24% From Jab
Janssen RRR 66.62% ARR 1.19% From Jab
Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR 66.84% ARR 1.28% From Jab
The Lancet
To the Pills:
Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial
November 5, 2021
Pfizer’s latest antiviral pill, Paxlovid (89% RRR), is your choice over Merck’s latest antiviral pill, Molnupiravir (50% RRR). However, your choice of antiviral pills to reduce risk of COVID-19 hospitalization or death is narrowed considerably when comparing the absolute risk reduction (ARR) of the Pfizer and Merck pills: Molnupiravir (6.8% ARR) barely beats out Paxlovid (6.2%). Why is the risk reduction of COVID-19 hospitalization or death so much lower in ARRs compared to RRRs? It all depends on how you manipulate the reported results of the Pfizer and Merck clinical trials.
The absolute risk reduction is the arithmetic difference in the rates of hospitalization or death—events or clinical endpoints in a trial—between the treatment and placebo groups
TrialSiteNews

Ian
Ian
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 year ago

Since viruses are generally accepted not to be living, how is it then possible to “kill off the virus”?

Thomas
Thomas
Reply to  Ian
1 year ago

Richard Noakes seems to be a troll.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 year ago

The world doesn’t depend on vaccines but the opposite. In past every big pandemic or epidemic happened in an era when there were wars or extreme weather and people starved. No vaccine can replace proper nutrition. Simple common sense.

ChristineAdair
ChristineAdair
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 year ago

I started earning $350/hour in my free time by completing tasks with my laptop that i got from this company I stumbled upon online…Check it out, and start earning yourself . for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot Here ……….. http://www.smartpay1.com

Last edited 1 year ago by ChristineAdair
Thomas
Thomas
Reply to  ChristineAdair
1 year ago

Government troll.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] November 27, 2021Only the Fully Vaccinated should fear the New “Worst Ever” Covid-19 Variant; data shows they alr… […]

mmc
mmc
1 year ago

We must not lose sight of what’s going on in the background, This article brilliantly sums it up.

https://independencedaily.co.uk/your-ongoing-betrayal-saturday-27th-november-2021/

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  mmc
1 year ago

I am watching father Alexis Bugnolo’ summary, the editor of the site, From Rome. A very good and dark summary.

Jenn
Jenn
1 year ago

Haven’t been jabbed and won’t be, but I am not sure that the graphs fairly represent the percentage of the population that has been jabbed vs. has not. If the mass majority of the populace has been, then it’s not fair to compare numbers. It seems we’d have to compare percentages. What would these graphs look like if adjusted?

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Jenn
1 year ago

The problem is that a high percentages were placebos, depending on reporting and source, observations it is 30-80%. These psychos made a ‘forecast’ for the populations of different countries, the west will be eliminated mainly, US, UK, Germany, Spain, etc. If I were them I would distribute vaxxes accordingly, more placebos where smaller population reduction was planned.

Amuzed_Traveler
Amuzed_Traveler
Reply to  GundelP
1 year ago

I keep seeing that statement. Is there any trustworthy documentation to back up that assertion? I do find it a completely plausible scenario, I’ve just never seen anything to support it.

AMP3083
AMP3083
Reply to  Amuzed_Traveler
1 year ago

WHY DO SOME DIE FROM THE COVID VACCINES, WHILE OTHERS ARE FINE?

Why do some people die, or become disabled for life, while others seem fine after being inoculated? Dr. Jane Ruby explains that not all vials have the same dosages. ClinicalTrials.gov shows that there are different phases of the vaccination experiment, with different dosages of the mRNA being administered to different people. An unknown percentage of the injections are even placebos!

This means that some people get a harmless substance injected, while others get a shot with 5, 10, 20, or 30 micrograms of mRNA.

Dr. Ruby warns that in the booster shots some vials contain as much as 100 or even 250 micrograms of mRNA. This explains why in certain areas the vaccinated seem fine, while in other areas people drop dead after being injected. It’s like Russian roulette: nobody knows what is being injected into their body. There is no informed consent. If people however take the boosters, they will get different dosages. Where previous shots may have been harmless, the next could be lethal.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Amuzed_Traveler
1 year ago

1 News from Slovenia:
https://davidicke.com/2021/11/25/report-fake-vaccine-batches-are-not-all-the-same-number-1-is-placebo-saline-number-2-is-a-classic-bottle-of-rna-number-3-is-an-rna-stick-that-contains-the-oncogene-that-contributes-to-the-develo/
30-33%

2 O’Looney funeral director’s guessing was 75 or 85 (sorry my fault, I forgot which one)

3 Dr Franc’ video, examining vials, first 2 were saline, 3rd had the ‘thing’
https://davidicke.com/2021/10/15/covid-vaccine-life-form-polish-doc-finds-the-thing-in-pfizer-comirnaty-shot/

4 Karen Kingston’ video, there are at least 12 different type (ingredients) of Pfizer vax plus placebos.

5 Stew Peters Show with Jane Ruby, half were placebos.

Amuzed_Traveler
Amuzed_Traveler
Reply to  Jenn
1 year ago

Exactly. We need to see infection rates for those vaccinated against the backdrop of all those vaccinated and the same thing for those unvaccinated against the backdrop of the unvaccinated in the population.

The most that can be said from the way the data is presented is that the “vaccine” seems to be worthless.

Ruislip
Ruislip
Reply to  Jenn
1 year ago

So why don’t you find out the percentage of vaccinated and compare it to the percentages shown above? It’s easy enough to do as the government make the percentage of those vaccinated publicly available. I have already done this and know that even taking into account the ratio of vaccinated versus unvaccinated the percentage of hospitalisations and deaths among the vaccinated is still higher. I am curious as to why you don’t do this. You see more interested in just casting doubt than establishing the truth. I wonder why?

Epicurious
Epicurious
Reply to  Ruislip
1 year ago

Yes the raw numbers need to be adjusted taking into account the populations of jabbed vs un-jabbed otherwise they are somewhat meaningless. This has been brought up a number of times but the editors do not seem to have taken notice. Note to editor if I’m wrong please point out where these are noted.

To avoid a potential Simpson’s Paradox can you advise the numbers you are working from as from my ‘rough’ calculations it would appear to me that hospitalisations and deaths for jabbed and un-jabbed per relevant population are similar based on a mix of 70% jabbed vs 30% un-jabbed. Given the basis of these jabs, not based on an isolated virus and based on a DNA chain guess, then I would expect the rates to be similar which they appear to be. The key determinate in all these calculations is an accurate figure for fully jabbed vs no-jabbed.

Jenn
Jenn
Reply to  Ruislip
1 year ago

I could and should, but don’t like it when people “play” with numbers. I think the truth can and should speak for itself and don’t want “my” side using the same dirty tricks as the MSM. I’m just pointing it out.

GundelP
GundelP
1 year ago

While in India:

‘…Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, the partners in manufacturing the Covishield (AstraZeneca) vaccine are made accused for their involvement in conspiracy.

In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission. In this regard the provisions of Section 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of IPC get attracted to make Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla guilty of mass murders i.e. Section 302, 115, etc. of IPC.

If convicted, they face the death penalty.

As per the expert opinion, considering the proofs of sterling nature, Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla will get death penalty.

….’
medicalkidnap com

Alisha Harrison
Alisha Harrison
1 year ago

I am making a good salary from home $1300-$2600/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

Here is what I do…. http://Www.WorkJoin1.com

Last edited 1 year ago by Alisha Harrison
gsn
gsn
1 year ago

“Does this make sense to you when the fully vaccinated account for only 47% of cases and the vaccines are alleged to reduce the risk of death by 95%?”
Actually the relative risk reduction against death is 50% as per Pfizer study. (2 un-vaccinated died of covid and 1 vaccinated died of covid pneumonia). If this is correct, the FDA should have never approved the jab in the first place .
95% is against disease (reduce the risk of getting the disease). I’m not sure if this 95% translates to hospitalization. So with the assumption there is no hospitalization risk reduction number from the Pfizer study, then the hospitalization should be an absolute number with the expectation that no hospitalization should happen for vaccinated.

Happyfax
Happyfax
1 year ago

well they have already got a new vaccine ready, for this variant lol.

19CE95E4-A510-4C4F-8063-A38E17328804.jpeg
Paul Prichard
Paul Prichard
1 year ago

People shouldn’t be mislabelling anti-authoritarians as anti-vaxxers.
Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-11-26. Synthetic pathogen, not vax. Heart Disorders up 118%, deaths up 5-fold FIFA players. 3 lots, 1 death (link).

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Paul Prichard
1 year ago

I am an antivaxxer, so what?! This kind of labelling, BRAINWASHING, using antivaxer as a badge of shame lead us to that that masses blindly trust in BP and governments and now watch the result!

In the comment section of another article here I copied the real, true news on the Lanka court case, ‘the measles virus doesn’t exist’ maybe you should read that. German High Court decision was after 5 professional’ testimonies among others that no proof that the measles virus exist (= no proof that a virus causes the illness).

They did this to stop children compulsory vaccinations, to prevent more cases of autism. 3rd comment from the bottom, READ THE CASE pls and stop using the expression ‘antivaxxer’ to label, should you listen to them, far less of you would have been injured and dying now! ‘We told you so..’

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/24/the-covid-lies-what-pandemic/

Last edited 1 year ago by GundelP
Dan
Dan
1 year ago

I very much hope you are wrong, so many of my friends and family are loaded with this poison. I have followed the UK data since early July, because of its transparency of numbers of Vaxx’d and unvaxx’d. They make there case of the more people in country jabbed ,the more cases will show as unvaxx’d. I ask, please explain in who’s world is it right, that so many “Doubled Jabbed people’ have gotten covid? over 400K I repeat 400 Thousand! And the deaths are so one sided = far more 4X more double jabbed dying as well! As I said since I started seeing this data back in July, Houston We Have A Problem! a HUGE Elephant in the room, and these same people doing this site,say the unvacc’d are seeing more hospitalizations and deaths,are they Blind?Stupid.or just plain trying to cover all with lie’s? Thankyou for your great info and take on this!

Kbro
Kbro
Reply to  Dan
1 year ago

Nicely put. I’ve been examining the same published UK data discussed in these reports progressively updated by the Theexpose, and am sure the reports do not “mess with” the underlying data. The graphical summaries are improving with each report and consistency of terminology is evident. So, even if some derived measures, such as rates, don’t match those of “authorities”, they are nonetheless transparently defined and clearly show that the injectable “therapies” are only marginally ineffective initially and probably deleterious in the longer term.

Last edited 1 year ago by Kbro
michael morgan
michael morgan
Reply to  Kbro
1 year ago

Well lets hope you have been reading table 6 in the reports(week 47) which give figures per 100000 of vacc vs unvacc…..doesn’t match up to the report?

Last edited 1 year ago by michael morgan
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Dan
1 year ago

Just got the news. My mother – despite of my begging – had not only the first Pfizer (I knew about) but turned out she had the second and the booster. Despite she lost his brother who died 10 days after his first vax. I live 2000 kms far, now neighbours calling me that my mother’ health sharply declines, something is wrong with her head, like a sudden dementia or Alzheimer, it started right after the first vax but back then examinations found nothing despite of she was complaining. Now it’s not safe her to live alone, she lost sense of time, mixing things and her personality changed a lot.

But surely just a co incidence.
Please if anyone saw / read about similar cases after Pfizer, redirect me to read after to know more what’s exactly happening because I am helpless. Thank you.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose said: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose reported: […]

snneed
snneed
1 year ago

baste

Jules
Jules
1 year ago

This plandemic will keep going….the UN and Big Pharma are making way too much money to give this up. Plus their goal to depopulate and then link people up to 5 g is still some way off. Each country need so do their best and the best is to not comply. Stop getting tested. Your dna is gold to them, its currency. So please see the bigger picture.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Jules
1 year ago

I agree. However I doubt that that linking to the 5G will work on the long term, our human bodies are simply not compatible with it, you can’t live long with that disruption of your own EMF. Or with graphene oxide circulating in you as no1 reason of the blood clots. I doubt they don’t know this, I think they don’t care how many die during this ‘interesting’ transhuman experiment.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose said: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] November 27, 2021Only the Fully Vaccinated should fear the New “Worst Ever” Covid-19 Variant; data shows they alr… […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose said: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose said: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Daily Expose said: […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] November 27, 2021Only the Fully Vaccinated should fear the New “Worst Ever” Covid-19 Variant; data shows they alr… […]

Georges
Georges
1 year ago

Thx for your hard work. For your conclusions to be fair, I think you should normalize the ratio vaxx/unvax in function of age : while vaxx rate are higer among elders, the vaxxed are “disadvantaged” in terms of hosp/death.

Leslie Fajardo
Leslie Fajardo
1 year ago

One of my sons is a paramedic. His two roommates have the vaccination. They have been ill with Covid several times.

hhh
hhh
1 year ago

The jabs are deadly and ineffective but this article has major issues with its statistical calculations. The following is wrong: “A vaccine effectiveness of +95% against death from Covid-19 would mean that the unvaccinated population have a 95% higher chance of dying if infected with Covid-19 than the vaccinated.”

95% effectiveness would mean if 100 unjabbed died, then only 5 jabbed would die. So in this case the unjabbed would have a 1900% greater risk of dying.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] The Expose – You’ve most likely been seeing headlines like ‘Worst Ever Covid Variant’ in the mainstream media, such as this one from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funded newspaper ‘The Guardian’. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Only the Fully Vaccinated should fear the New “Worst Ever” Covid-19 Variant; data shows they already account for 4 in every 5 Covid Deaths (link). […]

Glayson Guimaraes Morais Ferreira
Glayson Guimaraes Morais Ferreira
1 year ago