The Office for National Statistics has revealed without realising it that children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine.
Back on 20th Dec 21, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21.
The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’.
What the dataset also includes is ‘age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for all deaths’, however they have conveniently left out the data for children, and only included data on age groups over the age of 18.
What they also did in the data they included is bunch all young adults together meaning the rates of death are calculated for 18-39 year-olds, a total of 22 years. But for every other age group the rates of death are calculated for a total of 10 years, with 40-49, 50-59 etc.
However, on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS have inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves, and to put it bluntly, they are horrifying, and make it obvious as to why the ONS chose to exclude children from the mortality rates dataset.
What the ONS have done, as can be seen in the above table, is provide an age standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years, rather than per 100,000 population.
The reason for this is that the size of each vaccination status population has been changing all the time, due to the unvaccinated moving into the one-dose category, and the one-dose vaccinated moving into the two-dose vaccinated category throughout the year.
So by doing it this way it provides a much more accurate picture of the mortality rates because it accounts both the number of people and the amount of time a person has spent in each vaccination status.
And on table 9, the ONS have provided us with the number of deaths by vaccination status among children and teenagers, and have kindly also provided us with the person-years, meaning we can calculate the mortality rate per 100,000 person years for 10-14 year olds, and 15-19 year olds by vaccination status.
According to the ONS, between 2nd January and 31st October 2021 there were 96 deaths recorded among 10-14-year-olds who had not been vaccinated, and 160 deaths recorded among 15-19-year-olds who had not been vaccinated.
The ONS have calculated the person-years among unvaccinated 10-14 year-olds during this period to be 2,094,711, whilst they’ve calculated person-years among unvaccinated 15-19 year-olds during this period to be 1,587,072.
To work out the mortality-rate per 100,000 person years all we need to now do is divide the person-years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths by the answer to that equation.
So for 10-14 year-olds we perform the following calculation –
2,094,711 (person-years) / 100,000 = 20.94711
96 (deaths) / 20.94711 = 4.58
Therefore, the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among unvaccinated 10-14-year-olds is 4.58 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21.
By using the same formula we find that the the mortality rate among unvaccinated 15-19-year-olds is 10.08 deaths per 100,000 person-years.
Now all we have to do is use the same formula to calculate the mortality rate among one-dose vaccinated and two dose vaccinated 10-14, and 15-19 year-olds, by using the person-years and number of deaths provided by the ONS in table 9 of their ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ report, which are as follows –
Here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 15-19-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years –
And here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 10-14-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years –
These figures are horrifying. The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21, children aged 10-14 were statistically 10 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically 2 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.
But it’s the double vaccinated figures that are truly frightening.
The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21, teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically 3 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers, but children aged 10-14 were statistically 52 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, recording a death rate of 238.37 per 100,000 person years.
But these figures are in fact even worse than they first appear, as if they weren’t already bad enough. This is because the unvaccinated mortality rate among 10-14-year-olds includes children aged 10 and 11 who are not eligible for vaccination.
Whereas the vaccinated mortality rates do not include 10 and 11 year olds because they were not eligible for vaccination at the time, with the JCVI only recently recommending on 22nd Dec 21 that 5 to 11-year-old children deemed to be high risk should be offered a Covid-19 vaccination.
Therefore, if the Covid-19 injections were not causing the untimely deaths of children then we would actually expect to see a mortality rate that is lower among the vaccinated population than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated population, not a mortality rate that is similar, and certainly not a mortality rate 52 times higher.
This jaw dropping and horrifying data should be national headline news, and we dread to think what the numbers will be in the next update from the ONS which will include data on millions of more children who received their 1st and 2nd dose of a Covid-19 vaccine after October 31st 2021.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, Latest News, The Expose Blog, World News
the “unvaccinated” numbers are a misnomer, because most deaths after the vaccination, occur within the first 14 days after vaccination, while they are “unvaccinated”.
A true picture, would be to include those “first 14 days” from vaccination, which would show a very different picture, don’t you think?
Any kid who has NOT been vaccinated, won’t suddenly have the vaccines – its parents don’t trust vaccines, any more than I do and they won’t change their point of view, any more than I will, we will remain not vaccinated, until vaccines are forced on us, against our Will, which probably won’t ever happen, because we have to consent to have them and it is our human rights to deny them, under Common Law.
I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year gone i used to be unemployed during an atrocious economy. (cfg28) I convey God on a daily basis. I used to be endowed with these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody.
Here is where I started…….. http://Www.Self25.com
SPAMMING SCUMBAG!
Get a life you moron!
You are correct but that would only make the figures worse. It could be the most of the unvacciated deaths are themselves vaccinated deaths within the first 14 days of the 1st jab.
Also the 10 and 11 year olds who have not been jabbed will have a mortality 10x smaller than the 12 and 13 year olds who have had one jab. So the deaths in the 12/13 year olds will be 91% of the class numbers not 50% So you can multiply the 1 dose figures by 91/50 i.e. 1.82. So actually the singly vaccinated 12/13 year olds are 18.2x more likely to die not 10x. So the figure would be 82.2 not 45.12
hi everyone. I have a question (I’m a ESL user so plz understand if i use broken English). my question is both groups(unvaxxed and vaxxed)’s denominator sizes are too much difference.
I mean, unvaxxed 10-14 age group students numbers denominator is 2,094,711 about more than 2million, but double vaxxed students numbers of denominator is only(10-14 age group) 1,678, so according to above calculate formula,
unvaxxed(10-14) / 100,000 versus double vaxxed (10-14) / 100,000.
my concern is, unvaxxed denominator size too big rather than double vaxxed denominator. this means, huge number of denominator obviously has advantage against small denominator of double vaxxed denominator. Even, death rate formula affected by each groups denominator size.
death tall / fatal rate = mortality rate, this means if we consider unvaxxed students number denominator is much smaller like (i.e. 1,678) and on the other hand, double vaxxed students numbers bigger like (i.e. 2million). If we just imagine like this bigger double vaxxed than unvaxxed. the results may big different numbers will come out. In conclusion, may use statics of early 2022 year or very late of 2021, the mortality rate result significantly changed rather than above (in the original this web site article).
I am quite sure the result change like 180 degree turning point. what do you think everyone? I am very sorry to use broken english
[ JOIN US ] I get paid more than $120 to $850 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $ 85 360 from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
more details…….. http://Www.NETCash1.Com
SPAMMING SCUMBAG!
Why do you not explain the “advantage” you refer to in relation to the large denominator of the unvaccinated group? Are you unaware that the same magnitude of difference affects the calculations at the other end of the age spectrum, where most old people are vaccinated? Your post looks suspiciously like trolling, an attempt at casting doubt on the article by word play. Broken English my ass.
Vaccines kill. That’s what’s important.
That means the data is even worse for adverse events. The worst outcomes in the official data is when the double jabbed have been more than a few weeks from the last dose.
Correct, and I understand the estimate is that around half of the “early deaths due to vax” occur within the first 14 days. So, you are correct – the figures are yet worse again if you take this into account. In other words, the jabs are working exactly as planned.
“the estimate is that around half of the “early deaths due to vax” occur within the first 14 days”
15-19; Vaccinated, 2 doses less than 21 days after second dose. Total deaths: ZERO. Just sayin’.
This data (available in the same spreadsheet) is not reported in the article….why?
Some points to consider :
1) That data point covers only a 21-day window, so limits the opportunity for death during that time.
2) People who already had one dose, and were able and willing to get a second dose, presumably had some degree of tolerance to the vaccine, so perhaps those people were unlikely to die within a short time period of having the second dose.
The fact remains, after the 21-day window, we observe a death rate per 100000 person-years that is over 3 times higher than the rate for the unvaccinated, for 15-19 year olds.
That is very serious, and cannot be overlooked.
This dataset tells us the vaccines must be stopped for children.
Other datasets might suggest the same for adults, but that’s a discussion for elsewhere.
The categories are :
unvaccinated
vaccinated with 1 dose only, less than 21 days after vaccination
vaccinated with 1 dose only, at least 21 days after vaccination
vaccinated with 2 doses, less than 21 days after second vaccination
vaccinated with 2 doses, at least 21 days after second vaccination
I believe the “unvaccinated” category means people who have not received any Covid vaccine because the “recently vaccinated” case is covered by the “less than 21 days” categories.
Therefore I think the analysis given in the article is correct.
“Therefore I think the analysis given in the article is correct.”
The article forgets to mention that deaths in the ‘less than 21 days’ are lower . If vaccine were the death cause, this would be rather unexpected.
Example: age 15-19, 2 doses, less than 21 days from second dose. Total deaths: ZERO
Some points to consider :
1) That data point covers only a 21-day window, so limits the opportunity for death during that time.
2) People who already had one dose, and were able and willing to get a second dose, presumably had some degree of tolerance to the vaccine, so perhaps those people were unlikely to die within a short time period of having the second dose.
The fact remains, after the 21-day window, we observe a death rate per 100000 person-years that is over 3 times higher than the rate for the unvaccinated, for 15-19 year olds.
That is very serious, and cannot be overlooked.
This dataset tells us the vaccines must be stopped for children.
Other datasets might suggest the same for adults, but that’s a discussion for elsewhere.
Good point Richard. I hope I can hold out here in Germany. No way will any of my kids get these jabs. Austria passed that it’s mandatory to get jabbed (with fines) but i think there are still some legal fights. Have you seen the UK Public heath act 1984? Draw your attention to section. Check Page 15 (Section 45c) the power given to ministers. BUT the next page (section 45E) reads that this may not include medical treatment. The idiots found the part they wanted to enforce their tyranny but didn’t read the next page. So the UK government is stuffed.
“the “unvaccinated” numbers are a misnomer, because most deaths after the vaccination, occur within the first 14 days after vaccination, while they are “unvaccinated”.“
The original data clearly states that the ‘unvaccinated’ category includes only people who did not receive any dose of vaccine. Having said that, why don’t you dig into the data by yourself? You will find out that this article supports its claim by ‘forgetting’ to talk about the numbers during the first 21 days after vaccination (when, as you said, most adverse effect occurs)
As an example:
15 to 19 yo – 2 doses – less than 21 days after 2nd dose: 43.091 person/years, ZERO deaths.
The ONS definition of unvaccinated simply means someone who has not received any doses.
Some points to consider :
1) That data point covers only a 21-day window, so limits the opportunity for death during that time.
2) People who already had one dose, and were able and willing to get a second dose, presumably had some degree of tolerance to the vaccine, so perhaps those people were unlikely to die within a short time period of having the second dose.
The fact remains, after the 21-day window, we observe a death rate per 100000 person-years that is over 3 times higher than the rate for the unvaccinated, for 15-19 year olds.
That is very serious, and cannot be overlooked.
This dataset tells us the vaccines must be stopped for children.
Other datasets might suggest the same for adults, but that’s a discussion for elsewhere.
[…] Source link […]
I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and de straightforward, don’t have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE…..,
>>>>>>> http://Www.SmartPay1.com
ANOTHER SCAMMING SCUMBAG!
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year gone i used to be unemployed during an atrocious economy. I convey God on a daily basis. I used to be endowed with these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody.
.
.
Here is where I started… http://www.MoneyStar1.com
Please make it peer reviewed and published asap. Maybe the BMJ?
Why? And the bmj? They’ve been pushing the slop from the get go. ‘Peer reviewed’ means a bunch of slime in universities read it. So what? Not had enough ‘experts’ yet?
This is how things are verified… by peer review, by having it confirmed by people who have dedicated their lives to this stuff. You sound like someone who doesn’t want to believe anything that doesn’t fit your narrative.
It’s important to have peer review. ‘A bunch of slime’ great, you are definitely here in good faith… /s
[…] January 29, 2022Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
As above, how many “unvaccinated” were within 14 days of Dose 1 (or is it 21 days as with the Scottish definitions)?
No one. If you look at the complete data, instead of reading the article, you’ll see it by yourself.
[…] red bar at left showing increased mortality after 2 dose vaccination x 52 times for age 10-14) Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th…By The Exposé on January 29, […]
[…] 23. !! Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
[…] The Expose – The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’. […]
[…] January 29, 2022Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
[…] – Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
What does ‘age standardised’ mean? Why can’t you just say X brats died, instead of using lawyer speak?
> The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21, teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically 3 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers, but children aged 10-14 were statistically 52 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, recording a death rate of 238.37 per 100,000 person years.
How many brats are poisoned and how many not poisoned?
And why is it all so ‘horrifying’? Don’t the non brats being snuffed out matter any more? What happened to all the ‘caring’ about the 100,000 murdered in ‘care’ homes and “the murderers will pay”? No one’s paying, except the taxpayer, and that for more murders.
Why are you calling children brats? How sick can you get?
I view the biggest crimes here to be related to both the elderly and children. Why? Well, NOBODY has had true informed consent, number one. However, the elderly and children have largely had their decisions made for them by someone else, and they do not have the opportunity to research and find the truth. So, I personally equate what has happened to the elderly along with what is happening with the kids as the most horrific parts of this poorly managed non-pandemic. This is the same reason I am home taking care of my post-stroke, brain-injured mum myself, because she does not choose to get a jab, or be in regular close contact with anyone who has! And I fully support her in that choice, and we’re doing just fine thanks – not even a sniffle all the way through this, even though we’ve complied with NONE of it right from the start. We do, however, eat clean, healthy food and ensure we have well-functioning innate immunity with optimal vitamin D levels and more. It’s a no-brainer, IMO.
[…] Oficjalne dane brytyjskie pokazują, że dzieci, które otrzymały szczepionkę Covid są 52 razy bardziej narażone na śmierć niż dzieci, które nie zostały zaszczepione. Office for National Statistics ujawniło statystykę , nie zdając sobie z tego sprawy, że dzieci są do 52 razy bardziej narażone na śmierć po zaszczepieniu Covid-19 niż dzieci, które nie miały zastrzyku. Teraz próbują to ukryć. .https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] compiled by the Office of National Statistics in Great Britain shows that giving young children the COVID shots, especially those aged from 10 to 14, makes their […]
Hi guys, I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…..
Try it, you won’t regret it!………. http://Www.Cash46.Com
[…] Read more: Official data shows children are up to 52 times more likely to die following ‘Covid’ fak… […]
The government has been sitting on this data for at least six weeks and urging children to get the second or third shot in that time. By my calculations at least 1500 children will needlessly die – and that’s just in the short term and assuming only 7 million are double jabbed. These criminals need to pay.
Thank you for trying to save children’s lives! This is one of the most important articles of the whole pandemic.
Hi,
I really want to know that this data is true, but the “person-years” thing is throwing me off and it lile a link to the site of original data. I want to share this but to the average person with no knowledge of calculating statistics it is not as or understandable as I would hope. I want to save the children and I just wish this was clearer so people wouldn’t doubt it. What (else) could I point to? Is there anything to supplement? Thanj you so much
Agree!
[…] Official data shows children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination th… […]
[…] Read more: Official data shows children are up to 52 times more likely to die following ‘Covid’ fake vaccin… […]
Sadly, this type of outcome was always going to be the case for children – who had the least risk from Covid, but the most to lose by taking the shots. Children generally have stronger immune systems, which would give a stronger response to any “vaccine.” Thus, I would expect the injuries to be higher. This is why Sweden, for example, has already come out to say that they see no benefit in “vaccinating” 5 to 11 year olds. Thank goodness for some common sense in Sweden!
[…] BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JANUARY 29, 2022 […]
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it (link). […]
[…] zu 52-mal höheres Sterberisiko haben als Kinder, die nicht geimpft wurden. Zu diesem Schluss kommt The Exposé anhand eigener […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] The Office for National Statistics has revealed without realising it that children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine. Back on 20th Dec 21, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in… — Weiterlesen dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] Source: DailyExpose […]
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
This is a travesty of statistics and mathematics. Normalizing the numbers to 100,000 is complete nonsense for very small datasets. For example, the 2 dose dataset for 10-14 year age group is 1678 person-years. Extrapolating this to 100,000 is erroneous in the order of 60x ! Look closely at the numbers and you start to see how effective the vaccines are
[…] Expose has already covered the disastrous figures for 10-14 and 15-19 year olds, and these will be a gross underestimate of the true scale of the […]
[…] Expose has already covered the disastrous figures for 10-14 and 15-19 year olds, and these will be a gross underestimate of the true scale of the […]
These people are pure evil & should be held accountable. Exterminate the creatures!
Don’t vaccinate children! It’s a global genocide/depopulation scam!
Proof? Sources? Or… emotion?
[…] BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JANUARY 29, 2022 […]
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… […]
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it .https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] The Exposé feststellt, umfasst eine separate Tabelle mit „Todesfällen und Personenjahren nach Impfstatus“ […]
[…] Pandemic Of The Injected https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] 原文链接：https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/ […]
[…] as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” […]
[…] as The Exposé points out, a second chart summarising “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” covers 5-year age […]
[…] as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” […]
[…] as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” […]
[…] as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” […]
[…] obstante, como señala The Exposé , un segundo cuadro que resume “muertes y años-persona por estado de […]
[…] red bar at left showing increased mortality after 2 dose vaccination x 52 times for age 10-14) Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th…By The Exposé on January 29, […]
The links to the ONS data are either wrong or the ONS have changed the data.
Those two groups are no longer on the Excel Spreadsheet.
[…] as noted by The Exposé, a separate table outlining “deaths and person-years by vaccination status” […]
[…] Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination th… Saúde, Vacina vacinação crianças. permalink. […]
[…] doute, et encore moins aux débats stériles avec des idiots et des fous. Il faut vraiment être un gouvernement de rosbifs pour ne pas comprendre […]