NHS100k has written a letter to Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer (“CMO”) for England, responding to his letter to all “colleagues” in the Department of Health and Social Care stating it is their “professional responsibility to reduce the risk of Covid-19 infection” – part of that responsibility, Whitty stated, was “getting vaccinated.”

NHS100k is a group bringing together NHS, care, and social workers who are saying NO to mandated experimental Covid injections.

Below is an image of Whitty’s letter.

In response, NHS100k tweeted: “Yesterday [9 February] we wrote to Chris Whitty and his signatories in response to his letter shown below dated 7th February that was sent to NHS staff. We are no more of a danger being vaccine free!”

Extracts from NHS100k’s response (emphases our own)

Dear Sir Chris Whitty

Your support for the staff vaccine mandate has been another reason for the staff crisis and service disruption.

You state that ‘one aspect of our professional responsibility is to reduce the risk of infection to others as far as possible so getting vaccinated against disease is part of that responsibility’.

Where is the categorical and peer reviewed evidence that staff and students being fully vaccinated will protect others?

There is no documented evidence for prevention of transmission of the virus and in the initial clinical trials for the current vaccines, this data could not be evaluated as it was not collected. Studies looking at transmission have not been in the hospital setting. However, the weekly vaccine surveillance reports clearly indicate the vaccines are not stopping transmission in the vaccinated as the case rates are significantly higher in that group.

Boris Johnson has stated to the public live on TV that ‘the vaccine does not stop you catching the virus or stop you passing it on’ and Sajid Javid is quoted as saying ‘two vaccines do not work against the new variant’.

You state the Covid vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ and provide a very high degree of protection from serious disease.

Data from both the Yellow Card reporting system and the VAERs reporting system gives grave concerns that these vaccines are not ‘safe and effective’.

It is apparent and concerning that you are ignoring the abhorrent adverse drug reactions and deaths evident on both reporting systems. Your failure as Chief Medical Officer to acknowledge the harm these are causing suggests that you are in contravention of your own professional responsibility.

Up until now, workers may have chosen to be vaccinated to protect themselves. The major factor here being ‘they chose’. Choice is a fundamental Human Right. If limits or restrictions are going to be placed upon these rights, then the following three tests must be adhered to, it must be lawful, it must be legitimate, and it must be proportionate. How does it meet these and specifically how does it meet proportionality?

We all also have a right to bodily autonomy and decisions over the treatment we undergo. Consent is a legal and ethical principle that must be valid, informed and voluntary. As health care professionals these are core values and principles to our daily interactions with our patients and is something we abide by, take pride in upholding and for some of us we are regulated on it by our relevant professional bodies.

Being told the vaccine is ‘safe and effective’ and only being provided with a select set of biased evidence surrounding the benefits and risks, and not providing reasonable alternatives to it, does not qualify as being ‘informed’. Any ‘consent’ to the Covid-19 vaccine would therefore not be legally valid as it would not be fully informed, free, voluntary or without coercion.

Part of the reason we cannot be told what the true risks and side effects are, is because the Covid-19 vaccines are still trial drugs and so there is still insufficient data available on safety concerns.

Not only that but certain cohorts were excluded from certain initial trials … [and Covid19 Vaccine Tracker states] ‘The long-term safety of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is unknown at present’. It goes on to say further data is required and will be collected for up to 2 years following the second dose of the cohort vaccine/placebo.

Natural immunity and antibody testing …  is also not given full consideration when looking at the safety of having antibodies prior to getting vaccinated.

There have been numerous studies carried out and published in both the Lancet and the BMJ (BMJ 2021;374: n2101) as well as other journals, regarding naturally-acquired antibodies from Covid-19 as well as potential increased systemic risks to those who have had Covid and then go on to be vaccinated.

If this is about health and about science, then why is this being overlooked?

Makary, 2021 in the British Medical Journal states: “If we want to be scientific, we should talk about the immune and the non-immune… not the vaccinated and unvaccinated”

Read NHS100k’s full response HERE.