Breaking News

Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have developed AIDS & are now 5.1x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The latest official Covid-19 figures from the Government of Canada are truly terrifying. They show that the double vaccinated population across Canada have now lost on average 74% of their immune system capability, and the triple vaccinated population across Canada have now lost on average 73% of their immune system capability compared to the natural immune system of unvaccinated people.

So much damage has now been done that the figures show the double vaccinated population are on average 3.8 times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 and 3.3 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population.

But it’s even worse for the triple vaccinated population in terms of their risk of death. The official figures show that they are on average 3.7 times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 but 5.1 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population.

These figures therefore suggest that both the double and triple vaccinated population in Canada have now had so much damage caused to their immune systems by the Covid-19 injections that they have now developed Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The Canadian Covid-19 figures are produced by the Government of Canada (see here).

Their latest data is available as a downloadable pdf here.

The Government of Canada is publishing its official Covid-19 data in a way that makes it appear Canada is very much experiencing a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’, and that the Covid-19 vaccines are clearly effective. But this data is a fraud.

Page 20 onwards of the downloadable pdf contains data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths from the very start of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign in Canada on 14th Dec 20 all the way through to 27th Feb 22.

And it is this date parameter that makes the presented data extremely misleading, because there was a huge spike in Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths in January 2021 when just 0.3% of Canada were considered fully vaccinated.

But thanks to the gift of the ‘WayBackMachine’, we can look at previous Government of Canada Covid-19 Daily Epidemiology Update’ reports to deduce who is actually accounting for the majority of these deaths, hospitalisations and cases.

Here are the tables from the January 30th, February 6th, February 13th, February 20th, and February 27th, Government of Canada Covid-19 Daily Epidemiology Update’ reports showing the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status from as far back as 14th December 2020, as well as the total population sizes of each vaccine group at the time of each report –

Now all we have to do is carry out simple subtraction to deduce who accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases and when. The following chart shows the total number of Covid-19 cases per week by vaccination status across Canada between 31st Jan 22 and 27th Feb 22 –

As you can see the not-vaccinated population have accounted for the least amount of cases every single week, and they have fallen week on week from 6,932 in the week ending 6th Feb, to 2,993 in the week ending 27th Feb.

Whereas cases among both the double and triple vaccinated have been astronomically higher but still fell week on week, except for the week ending 27th Feb where we can see cases among the triple vaccinated started to climb again.

‘But this is to be expected when the unvaccinated population is so small!’, we hear you claim. But unfortunately you’re wrong.

The population of Canada is approximately 38.01 million.

Therefore, based on the figures provided by the Government of Canada in the tables above, here is a chart showing the population size by vaccination status across Canada each week between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22 –

The unvaccinated population size is deduced by simply subtracting the total population size of those who’ve received at least one dose of Covid-19 Vaccine in Canada from the overall population size of 38.01 million. The double vaccinated population size is simply deduced by subtracting the triple vaccinated population size from the total population size of those who’ve received at least two doses in Canada.

As you can see the largest population size is actually the unvaccinated population, falling from 13.31 million in the week ending 6th Feb to 13.11 million in the week ending 27th Feb. Whereas the triple vaccinated population has increased from 10.9 million in the week ending 6th Feb to 12.9 million in the week ending 27th Feb.

So why on earth are there so many more cases among the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated population when –

a) They have a smaller population size than the unvaccinated? &

b) They have had a vaccine that allegedly reduces their risk of contracting Covid-19?

The answer is obvious. It’s because the Covid-19 vaccines damage the immune system and make recipients more likely to contract Covid-19.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 case-rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status across Canada per week between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22 –

The case-rate is deduced by first dividing the total population size of each vaccine group by 100,000. The number of cases in each vaccine group is then divided by the answer to the previous equation to calculate the case-rate.

e.g. –
13.31 million / 100,000 = 133.1
6,932 cases / 133.1 = 52.08 cases per 100,000 individuals

As you can see the case rate has been astronomically higher among both the double and triple vaccinated since at least the 31st Jan 22. Now that we know the case-rates we can use Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula to work out the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among both the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated populations.

That formula is –

Unvaccinated Case Rate – Vaccinated Case Rate / Unvaccinated Case Rate x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness %

The following chart shows the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness across Canada among the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated population based on the case-rates above-

In the week ending 6th Feb the real-world vaccine effectiveness among the double vaccinated was an absolutely shocking minus-221.16%. But by the week ending 27th Feb this had fallen even further to minus 276.16%.

But the triple vaccinated population, whilst faring ever so slightly better, have seen a much steeper decline. In the week ending 6th Feb the real world vaccinated effectiveness among the triple vaccinated was still a shocking minus minus-197.79%. But by the week ending 27th Feb this had fallen to minus-269.87%.

This means that on average, the double vaccinated population are 3.8 times more likely to contract Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, and the triple vaccinated population are 3.7 times more likely to contract Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

But vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

The Covid-19 vaccine is supposed to train your immune system to recognise the spike protein of the original strain of the Covid-19 virus. It does this by instructing your cells to produce the spike protein, then your immune system produces antibodies and remembers to use them later if you encounter the spike part of the Covid-19 virus again.

But the vaccine doesn’t hang around after it’s done the initial training, it leaves your immune system to take care of the rest. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

The problem we’re seeing here is that the immune system isn’t returning to its original and natural state. If it was then the outcomes of infection with Covid-19 would be similar to the outcomes among the not-vaccinated population.

Instead, it continues to decline at a rate that means the not-vaccinated population have a better performing immune system, so this means the Covid-19 injections are decimating the immune systems of the fully vaccinated.

The following chart shows the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated immune system performance across Canada vs the natural immune system performance of the unvaccinated population –

The immune system performance is calculated by using a slightly different calculation to the one used to equate vaccine effectiveness, which is as follows –

Unvaccinated case rate – Vaccinated case rate / LARGEST OF EITHER unvaccinated case rate OR vaccinated case rate X 100 = Immune System Performance %
e.g. –
Triple Vaccinated 21st Feb to 27th Feb = 22.83 – 84.44 / 84.44 x 100 = -72.96%

These figures show that the average double vaccinated Canadian has lost 73.42% of their immune system capability, meaning they are down to the last 26.58% of their immune system for fighting certain classes of viruses and certain cancers etc.

But unfortunately, the third jab hasn’t improved things because these figures show the average triple vaccinated Canadian has lost 72.96% of their immune system capability, meaning they are down to the last 27.04% of their immune system for fighting certain classes of viruses and certain cancers etc.

However, the figures provided by the Government of Canada are not separated by age-group, instead they provide overall figures for the entire population. And as we know, vaccine effectiveness (which is really immune system performance), is declining by the week.

Therefore, it’s perfectly plausible to assume that those who received the vaccine first will now be suffering much more severe immune system degradation than those who have only just received their second or third jab. And based on the following official figures on death, we propose that many double and triple vaccinated Canadian’s have surpassed the minus-90% to minus-100% immune system performance barrier, meaning they have essentially developed some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

The following chart shows the total number of Covid-19 deaths per week by vaccination status across Canada between 31st Jan 22 and 27th Feb 22 –

We have had to group the last two weeks together because the 27th Feb report showed less deaths in all vaccination groups than the 20th Feb report, with the exception of triple vaccinated who saw an increase. So we deduced the number of deaths between the 14th Feb report and 27th Feb report.

As you can see, just like with cases there have been far more deaths among both the double and triple vaccinated, but special attention should be paid to the final two weeks.

The following chart shows the population size by vaccination status across Canada between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22 –

The following chart shows the Covid-19 death-rate per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status across Canada per week between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22 based on the death figures and population size figures above –

As you cans see the death rate has been lowest among the unvaccinated since at least 31st Jan 22, and highest among the triple vaccinated population. But the death rates shown for 14th Feb to 27th Feb are deeply troubling.

The following chart shows the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against death across Canada among the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated population based on the death-rates above-

In the week ending 6th Feb the real-world vaccine effectiveness among the double vaccinated was a troubling minus-10.79%. But by the week ending 27th Feb this had fallen to an absolutely shocking minus-228.52%.

But things are far worse for the triple vaccinated. In the week ending 6th Feb the real-world vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated was a disturbing minus-57.25%. But by the week ending 27th Feb this had fallen to devastating minus-414.49%.

This means that on average, the double vaccinated population are 3.3 times more likely to die ofCovid-19 than the unvaccinated, but the triple vaccinated population are a shocking 5.1 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

But don’t forget vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

The following chart shows the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated immune system performance against death across Canada vs the natural immune system performance of the unvaccinated population –

Double vaccinated individuals across Canada had an immune system performance of minus-69.56% by the 27th Feb 22, but triple vaccinated individuals across Canada had an immune system performance of minus-80.56%. This is what Covid-19 vaccination has done to the people of Canada.

AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is the name used to describe a number of potentially life-threatening infections and illnesses that happen when your immune system has been severely damaged.

People with acquired immune deficiency syndrome are at an increased risk for developing certain cancers and for infections that usually occur only in individuals with a weak immune system.

Unfortunately, official Government of Canada data indicates that a large proportion of the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated population have now developed Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, (AIDS) or a novel condition with similar attributes that can only be described as Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

Share this page to Telegram
4.4 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

111 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kitevo3639
kitevo3639

Today i am going to show you that how to earns more than $500 every day simply working and staying at home. Last month my earning from this are $16205 and i gave this job only 2 hours from my whole day. Easiest way to earn more income online and it doesn’t needs any kind of special experience. Go to this website right now and follow details to get started right now.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.salarybaar.com/

Last edited 10 months ago by kitevo3639
Elise Donnelly
Elise Donnelly
Reply to  kitevo3639
10 months ago

Every month I am earning more than $8650 by doing a very simple online job from my home. By doing this in my part time I was able to save enough to buy me a new car in just a few months. This is so freaking easy that everyone should try it… Start making some dollars online today by following instructions on this website

==>>  http://Www.TopEasyWork.com

Last edited 10 months ago by Elise Donnelly
Ammy
Ammy
Reply to  Elise Donnelly
10 months ago

I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 10 months ago by Ammy
fesoge6501
fesoge6501
Reply to  Elise Donnelly
10 months ago

Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.Homzjob.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by fesoge6501
Barbara Naquin
Barbara Naquin
Reply to  kitevo3639
10 months ago

Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. 
accompanying site————— http://W­w­w.N­e­t­C­a­s­h­1.­C­o­m

Last edited 10 months ago by Barbara Naquin
James52
James52
Reply to  Barbara Naquin
10 months ago

I get paid more than £145 to £395 per HOUR for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily £23k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…

Here’s what I do…………>>>    http://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 10 months ago by James52
HeatherMorgan
HeatherMorgan
Reply to  kitevo3639
10 months ago

Google is presently paying $10447 to $13025 every month for working on the web from home. I have joined this activity 2 months back and I have earned $15248 in my first month from this activity. I can say my life is improved totally! Look at it what I do…. http://www.pays11.com

Last edited 10 months ago by HeatherMorgan
Petra
Petra
10 months ago

Are you sure this is a new form of AIDS?

ADE, Antibody Dependant Enhancement, was before also a fairly similar phenomenon for which many experts warned us.

Could you please explain the difference between both these problematic outcomes and the things you observe which indicate it’s a new form of AIDS?

Thanks for your great articles! The Exposé is one of the very last investigative journalism sites that exposes what’s happening in this world!

Brooklyn
Brooklyn
Reply to  Petra
10 months ago

I get paid over $90 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .
Here’s what I have been doing…  http://www.cashoffer9.com

Last edited 10 months ago by Brooklyn
LisaBurgess
LisaBurgess
Reply to  Brooklyn
10 months ago

Google pay 390$ reliably my last paycheck was $55000 working 10 hours out of consistently on the web. My increasingly youthful kinfolk mate has been averaging 20k all through continuous months q and he works around 24 hours reliably. I can’t trust how direct it was once I attempted it out. This is my essential concern…:) GOOD LUCK
For more info visit………….. http://Www.SmartPay1.com

Last edited 10 months ago by LisaBurgess
pat
pat
Reply to  Petra
10 months ago

> Are you sure this is a new form of AIDS?

How could they be? They’re not doctors.

> ADE, Antibody Dependant Enhancement, was before also a fairly similar phenomenon for which many experts warned us.

Ah, more experts. Too many experts spoil the truth.

> The Exposé is one of the very last investigative journalism sites that exposes what’s happening in this world!

A journalist goes out into the world and questions their sources, chases up information, and generally verifies that what they’re writing is true. All these web sites are run by people sat in their houses who download things and engage in the huge game of chinese whispers that is the internet. It’s not journalism, because both you and they have no way of knowing that what they write is true.

DanL
DanL
Reply to  pat
10 months ago

Actually when you have a brain and use it you can tell.

Last edited 10 months ago by DanL
Emil Klassen
Emil Klassen
Reply to  pat
10 months ago

This is GoC data. The numbers are real. Call it what you will, but as an epidemiologist I can confirm our case, hospitalization and death numbers show that the vaccinated and boosted are at higher risk of BA1/2 than the unvaccinated.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Petra
10 months ago

It’s not AIDS, more precisely if you dig a bit, you learn that AIDS is not a viral disease but poisoning caused immune system collapse.

The vaxxes had graphene oxide, it’s an ionizer, who is ill, ill with acute radiation sickness which can have many form depending on where it was the most accumulated in the body, as you are irradiated from the inside. However who got two high doses of radiation in past died to two things mainly, immune deficiency (like AIDS) because the bone marrow had a key role but radiation ruined it) and / or inside bleeding (similar symptoms to a hemorrhagic fever hence the Marburg tale in advance).

It’s graphene oxide and wireless radiation’ mutual effect. They never will openly admit it as it would be the end of their desired control if Ppl would get rid of it.

Graphene oxide degrades with time, till then it’s the matter of luck, reduce the exposure to wireless radiation to prevent the graphene being boosted.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
troy
troy
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

Why thank you, dr grundel, for explaining that to all us uneducated ones. Can I clean your toilet now?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  troy
10 months ago

Nice attempt at spelling the name of GundelP. Reading and writing are very complicated.

Snudgie
Snudgie
Reply to  GundelP
2 months ago

I hate to burst your bubble, but there is no graphene in the vax.
The crap that’s already in it is bad enough.
Do a search for /report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany.pdf The report is on the Rense page.
By shouting about graphene you’re just tilting at windmills; it’s a distraction.
Try this. ” I’m not getting any vaccine cos it’s got graphene in it”
Them; “we can prove that it doesn’t, so will you take your vaccine now?”
It’s poison and doesn’t need the graphene to maim, kill and lay to waste.

Fleur
Fleur
Reply to  Petra
10 months ago

Go to Steve Kirsch on substack.com he covers this really well. And get off goole ,use brave .com Google compromised. Use Signal instead of Snitchapp( whatsapp ) and if you have Gmail change that as well to ctemplar.com or protonmail .Gmail not secure.

troy
troy
Reply to  Fleur
10 months ago

> Google compromised. Gmail not secure.

LOL.

> use brave .com

Even more LOL.

> Gmail change that as well to ctemplar.com or protonmail

What a load of bull. Have you, by any chance, been reading somebody’s ‘security’ site, and ‘learned’ how to stay ‘safe’ on the internet? The guy behind brave was booted from mozilla for being, how can you put it, a jerk, and so he set up a competing ‘browser’ that’s essentially the google browser with at least 5 seperate pieces of spyware bolted on. So it’s also hilarious that you suggest using it instead of google. And protonmail is such a PITA to use that no one will ever use it for more than five minutes. Do you know what the person at the other end receives when you send a mail from protonmail? Most people will never reply. If you’ve got some top secret messages to send to your ‘friends’ then you can just use a secure messaging application like GPGP. Otherwise, it’s pointless hiding your emails to anyone else, because no one cares one jot what you write to each other.

Manne
Manne
10 months ago

Maybe I’m getting something wrong here so I would be happy if anyone can correct me on that, but one thing doesn’t make sense to me here: In the table “Population size by vaccination status”, you claim that there are 13,1 million unvaccinated individuals in Canada and thus being the biggest group out of the three. But this just doesn’t seem right. If I go on Google, it says that as of now, 47% of all Canadians are tripple vaccinated. Obviously this is bigger than the number of unvaccinated people. And if 13,1 million people in Canada are not vaccinated, that would equate to roughly 34% of the total population. Again, according to Google, 81% have received at least two doses, meaning there are no more than 19% of people who could possibly count as unvaccinated.

Not sure if I’m messing something up here and getting confused, but can someone explain this to me?

Eddie
Eddie
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

I was just about to post the same query, can someone explain this.

Fleur
Fleur
Reply to  Eddie
10 months ago

Go to Steve Kirsch on substack.com he covers this topic really well.

troy
troy
Reply to  Fleur
10 months ago

Are you this Steve Kirsch’s wife, or just his publisist? You sure do like him either way…

canadian
canadian
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

What does “going on google” mean? You say it twice, so have you looked at two different sources? That would explain it. Most figures are simply made up by the author as click bait. The author of this particular click bait gave you their sources at the top — the canadian ‘government’ (for all the good that will do you, given who they are). Besides that, you can’t deduce that bar graph from the tables given. Presumably, if you download the pdf you can, but I can’t be bothered frankly, given that it’s only telling you what you already know — that the jabs are poison. Regarding your question, if you add up any of the four sets of columns it doesn’t add up anyway. For example, the last column has 13.11 + 10.60 + 12.90 = 36.61m, whereas they state the population is 38.01m immediately above that, so there are apparently 38.01 – 36.61 = 1.4m people in canada that are neither jabbed nor unjabbed. Like I said, all click bait…

A Person
A Person
Reply to  canadian
10 months ago

“Going on Google” means typing ‘Canada coronavirus cases’ into the Google search engine and then scrolling down a few inches until you get the vaccination graph (provided by “Our World in Data”). But yeh, doing that does seem to me to be providing poison status graphs that contradict this article.

Also, the 1.4m people that you calculated are simply the ones who received only one dose of poison. The “Our World in Data” graph says those people are currently 4.1% of the total Canadian population (38.01m) so that’s 1.558m people. Which is close to 1.4m, given small discrepancies due to calculation approximations.

troy
troy
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

> “Going on Google” means typing ‘Canada coronavirus cases’ into the Google search engine and then scrolling down a few inches

Yeah, thanks, captain obvious.

Johnson
Johnson
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

google has a bunch of useful resources, you can find legitimate educational websites that do give real data that is made for the public. if you’re saying google isn’t a useful source, then you can’t listen to anyone unless you are legitimately working in the system yourself (which i doubt a lot of people who frequent this website are involved in or would even have the slightest clue on how to get started on that career path.)

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
Reply to  canadian
10 months ago

Presumably those 1.4m people have received only one dose.

Patrick
Patrick
Reply to  canadian
10 months ago

You have to remove all the kids under 5 years old who are not vaccinated, roughly 3 millions, so that leaves 35 millions adults which makes sense with the graphs.
One of the main issues with the official data is the following. Deaths and hospitalizations of people between day 1 of the first jab and day 15 after the second jab are classified as non vaccinated. Most vaccine adverse effects happened during that period which is a trick to increase the hospitalizations, ICU admissions and fatalities of the non-vaccinated category.
The European Eudra Vigilance has changed its reporting to include all adverse effects since day one of the vaccination.
So it doubles the number of deaths to 42,000 and triples the adverse effects to 3.2 millions.
Like in the UK the percentage of non-vaccinated based on the March 2022 data is close to 32%. It includes the people with one jab of the 2 jabs protocol (Pfizer, Moderna and Astra-Zeneca).

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

Let’s do a calculation based on the Google information.

So a recap from the above article on deaths is that during the period 14-27 Feb, there were 32 unpoisoned deaths, 85 double poisoned deaths and 162 triple poisoned deaths.

If I use the current “Our World in Data” graph info provided by Google, I get 14.2% of Canada’s population are unpoisoned, 34.2% are double poisoned and 47.5% are triple poisoned.

Death rate for unpoisoned is 32/14.2 = 2.253521
Death rate for double poisoned is 85/34.2 = 2.485380
Death rate for triple poisoned is 162/47.5 = 3.410526

It is interesting that the triple poisoned now are doing so badly in this data set, in terms of death rate (worse than unpoisoned or double poisoned). This may be why Tony Fauci recently reportedly said, “I would project that sooner or later, we will need a fourth [shot]”, perhaps under the theory that each shot provides temporary help to the immune system, before crushing it mercilessly in the long term.

Last edited 10 months ago by A Person
troy
troy
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

> Let’s do a calculation based on the Google information.
So a recap from the above article

Yeah, thanks, captain tedious.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  troy
10 months ago

No offence, but if you were able to read and understand numbers, you would realise that the writer of the article wasn’t using the figures from Google but was using figures from the Government of Canada and the WayBackMachine, which Manne had pointed out are quite different from the Google figures.

Last edited 10 months ago by A Person
John
John
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

Sorry, but the numbers you’re using for deaths have no source. Despite the image says it’s from Canada’s Government, there’s no source link for verification like the first images of this article. 

Fortunately, I’ve found an official document with the real numbers which can be checked here: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/surv-covid19-weekly-epi-update-20220318-en.pdf

It says (page 14):

“From 30 January to 27 February 2022, adjusting for age, comparisons of hospitalization rates indicate that:
– Among youth and adults aged 12 to 59 years, unvaccinated people were 3 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people, and 6 times more likely to be hospitalized than people fully vaccinated with an additional dose.
– Among older adults aged 60 years or older, unvaccinated people were 4 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people, and 13 times more likely to be hospitalized than people fully vaccinated with an additional dose.”

Very different statistics than yours.

John
John
Reply to  John
10 months ago

Seems like they made a typo. It should be “3 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people, and 6 times more likely to die” and “4 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people, and 13 times more likely to die”.

A similar sentence is available on the daily update (posted in the article above): COVID-19 daily epidemiology update – Canada.ca where you can ctrl+f and find:

“From January 30, 2022 to February 27, 2022, compared to fully vaccinated cases, unvaccinated cases were 4 times more likely to be hospitalized and 6 times more likely to die as a result of their illness. Compared to cases fully vaccinated with an additional dose, unvaccinated cases were 11 times more likely to be hospitalized and 15 times more likely to die as a result of their illness, during this same 4-week period (Table 3).”

Last edited 10 months ago by John
A Person
A Person
Reply to  John
10 months ago

Good points! I’ll admit that the figures of “32 unpoisoned deaths, 85 double poisoned deaths and 162 triple poisoned deaths” for the period 14-27 February, 2022, I just took from the article above and assumed to be true. But now that I look the link up, I can’t find them – although I can’t really find the number of deaths in that period at all.

In fact, even using this article to conjure the figures seems incongruous.

e.g. you can see in the tables above it says:

unpoisoned deaths
Feb 13 – 9147
Feb 20 – 9240
Feb 27 – 9179

double poisoned deaths
Feb 13 –2306
Feb 20 –2397
Feb 27 –2387

triple poisoned deaths
Feb 13 –1189
Feb 20 –1286
Feb 27 –1351

Using these figures, the difference between Feb 13 and 27 for unpoisoned being 32 (9179-9147), double poisoned is 81 (not quite matching the article’s claim of 85) and triple poisoned 162.

But wait a second? What’s this? Despite the numbers being cumulative, the number of unpoisoned deaths by Feb 20 (9240) is MORE than the number of unpoisoned deaths for Feb 27 (9179). 61 unpoisoned people arose from the grave between Feb 20 and Feb 27???

So yeh, maybe the figures just don’t make sense :(.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

Although I’ve figured out one thing – the comment from Canada’s figures of “unvaccinated cases were 4 times more likely to be hospitalized and 6 times more likely to die as a result of their illness” is unscientific and refuted!

The refutation is that it is based on their figures (let’s address deaths) of 63.1% of deaths being unpoisoned (9179 deaths) and 9.3% of deaths being triple poisoned (1351 deaths) i.e. 63.1 is 6 times greater than 9.3. But as this Expose article points out, a lot of these 9179 deaths were recorded way before the golden age of Covid poisons e.g. “there was a huge spike in Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths in January 2021 when just 0.3% of Canada were considered fully vaccinated”. So of course, when deaths were recorded in January 2021, they were bound to be almost all unpoisoned.

They can’t possibly scientifically include deaths from back then and conclude unpoisoned are currently 6 times more likely to die than triple poisoned.

Last edited 10 months ago by A Person
A Person
A Person
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

Also, I’ve finally tracked down the sources. Indeed the Canadian government gives the unpoisoned figures of:

unpoisoned deaths
Feb 13 – 9147
Feb 20 – 9240
Feb 27 – 9179

exactly as I’d put above. Which, of course, makes no sense – how can the number of deaths drop within a week? The Canadian government mucked up so I can’t see how we can analyse it.

The above figures for each week for unpoisoned (and for double and triple poisoned) are at https://web.archive.org/web/20220304200849/https://health-infobase.canada.ca/src/data/covidLive/Epidemiological-summary-of-COVID-19-cases-in-Canada-Canada.ca.pdf , https://web.archive.org/web/20220316032850/https://health-infobase.canada.ca/src/data/covidLive/Epidemiological-summary-of-COVID-19-cases-in-Canada-Canada.ca.pdf and https://health-infobase.canada.ca/src/data/covidLive/Epidemiological-summary-of-COVID-19-cases-in-Canada-Canada.ca.pdf .

Patrick
Patrick
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

Remember the majority of deaths due to vaccination adverse effects happens after the first dose and before day 15 after the second dose (blood clots, cardiac arrests, cerebral palsy, neuro-degenerative syndromes, etc…) when people are considered non-vaccinated. So they die with Covid (infected by the spike protein) but not from Covid.

dja
dja
Reply to  John
10 months ago

It depends on the population denominators. Underestimating the number of unvaccinated (which authrities are doing, probably purposefully) leads to huge swings from Vaxxed to unvaxxed.

Also vax damaged and fatalities are counted as unvaxxed in hospital when testing positive (using a flawed test which gives huge numbers of false positives).

CWC
CWC
Reply to  John
10 months ago

It’s easy

The govt is referring to the chance of dying/hospitalization after infection

The author is referring to chance of getting infected AND hospitalized or die, which is the same goalpost UK govt reports have been using

So double and triple juiced are worse off due to much higher chance of infection, even though they have better outcome once infected

Expert
Expert
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

The double vaxxed and triple vaxxed are the elderly who have high case fatality rate. The unvaxxed are children who dont need to be vaccinated as they have next to no symptoms and dont die. There is your smoking gun or lack thereof. You need to use age standardised mortality rates to make sense of this data

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Expert
10 months ago

The UK data is better than this Canadian faulty data (which showed 61 unpoisoned people coming back to life a week later by Feb 27).

But the age-standardised data at the Expose article https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/04/russia-distracts-uk-gov-reveal-vaccinated-more-likely-to-die-covid/ was quite astonishing. The ‘Covid-19 Death-rate per 100,000 Individuals by Vaccination Status + Age Group in England 31 Jan – 27 Feb 22’ showed a death rate for double poisoned to be over 3 times higher than the death rate for unpoisoned for both the 70-79 year age group and the 80+ age group but only 0.8 times higher for the 18-29 year age group for double poisoned over unpoisoned.

Quite astonishing, because we’ve been fed by the media that the oldest age groups benefit the most from injected Covid poisoning. However, that UK data actually suggested that currently poisoning the oldest members of the community (70+ years old) by Covid injections produces the worst age death rates.

So even the media argument that we should shove Covid poisons into old people seems to be nonsense, according to that data.

Fleur
Fleur
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

Go to Steve Kirsch on substack.com he covers these things really well. And sop using Google, it is compromised start using brave.com ,better.

troy
troy
Reply to  Fleur
10 months ago

What, you again? “We luuuurrrvvvveee you steve….”

John
John
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

Note that those images have no source like the others. Interesting to point that too.

K James
K James
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

There are 13 jurisdictions in Canada, not 12. It appears the report is missing Quebec (about 8 million population). As a result, only about 4 to 5 million people are unvaccinated, not 13 million. Changes the calculations enormously. By removing Quebec population, the 80 percent vaccination rate reported for Canada makes sense when applied to the 12 jurisdictions. The whole article’s conclusions are essentially nonsense.

D-O double G
D-O double G
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

the data from government of Canada is only from 12 out of 13 jurisdictions

Last edited 10 months ago by D-O double G
Expert
Expert
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

You have forgotten all the children and babies. Government vaccination percentages just apply to those of vaccine eligible ages not the entire population.

Aworkingmind
Aworkingmind
Reply to  Manne
10 months ago

Because the numbers from Google are fake. Companies like Google work hand-in-hand with governments and intelligence agencies on things like this. That’s why you have “disclaimers” on all legacy social media platforms like Twitter and YouTube now linking to “trusted sources” on covid information.

Any time someone tweets something about covid that goes against the official narrative, the “fact checkers” swoop in to call them a conspiracy theorist and to put their arm around you and gently guide you over to the “experts”.

Whether you like it or not, whether you are aware of it or not, a large part of your decision-making process involves looking around at what everyone else is doing. They want to give you the impression that “everybody’s doing it”. When you see that the overwhelming majority of people are doing something, two major things happen: 1) you develop a more positive view of that action or behavior, and 2) your perception of the risk involved in engaging in that action or behavior is lowered.

In essence, they are trying to create a false consensus to further encourage you to take the shots. They also want to create a sense of isolation among the unvaccinated, thereby further increasing pressure on that group to comply.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] 6.  !! Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have devel… […]

Plebney
Plebney
10 months ago

No, you are not going to make big money in your spare time working online. There is no secret high paying job that can only be found in the spam in the comments section.

You CAN however, go to their websites, get a computer virus, and pay them money for the privilege of joining their pyramid scheme. Meanwhile, since they now have your IP address, you can be targeted for more get-rich-quick spam.

troy
troy
Reply to  Plebney
10 months ago

You can’t spam someone using their IP address.

Just saying…

trackback
10 months ago

[…] De laatste officiële Covid-19 cijfers van de regering van Canada zijn werkelijk angstaanjagend. Zij tonen aan dat de dubbel gevaccineerde bevolking in heel Canada nu gemiddeld 74% van haar immuunsysteemvermogen verloren heeft, en dat de drievoudig gevaccineerde bevolking in heel Canada nu gemiddeld 73% van haar immuunsysteemvermogen heeft, vergeleken met het natuurlijke immuunsysteem van ongevaccineerden, bericht Dailyexpose.uk. […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] –  Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have deve… […]

teleny
teleny
10 months ago

Good work – for which I’m giving you 20% of the BBC licence fee per month.

Joe
Joe
10 months ago

The pop-ups on your site are absolutely insufferable, and you can’t expect to get important news out through an insufferable website design. It is indeed a way of discrediting stories, to rinse them through sites like these.

IainW
IainW
Reply to  Joe
10 months ago

I don’t get any pop-ups

trackback
10 months ago

[…] De laatste officiële Covid-19 cijfers van de regering van Canada zijn werkelijk angstaanjagend. Zij tonen aan dat de dubbel gevaccineerde bevolking in heel Canada nu gemiddeld 74% van haar immuunsysteemvermogen verloren heeft, en dat de drievoudig gevaccineerde bevolking in heel Canada nu gemiddeld 73% van haar immuunsysteemvermogen heeft, vergeleken met het natuurlijke immuunsysteem van ongevaccineerden, bericht Dailyexpose.uk. […]

kitevo3639
kitevo3639
10 months ago

hello

mike perfect
mike perfect
10 months ago

Im unvaccinated and far from a fan of the ‘jabs’ but in this particular case can we know that these death rates dont simply reflect the fact that with the vast majority of deaths occurring among the aged , then if the old and vulnerable are far more likely to be ‘jabbed ‘ , these death figures may be distorted by most of the unvaxxed being young and healthy ?

Johnson
Johnson
10 months ago

did the person who wrote this article major in stats? or take a stats class? they read all the information incorrectly and are using manipulative readings of the stats to back up their claims. if you want to get checked on what you did wrong, email me and I can walk the writer through their problems.

steven george
steven george
10 months ago

I have been seeing reports which confirm the trend of dying after vaccination. All causes deaths data show a massive jump in death numbers for people aged between 20 years and 45 years. These are thought to be the most vaccinated group. (The very elderly, also show a rise in deaths, this rise in deaths cannot be used as age would be too big a factor of effect in dying after vaccination.) However one has to highlight also the deaths of vaccinated children also.

Elda
Elda
Reply to  steven george
10 months ago

The numbers look pretty bad for life insurance offered in businesses offering it as part of employment package of benefits. I do not remember the numbers but it was shocking. Now I read people are quiting jobs to get better ones though it seems more likely they are either disabled or dead not looking for better jobs. This is scaring me. I depend on my Social Security and I see it going away soon. I know that’s why they want all retirement age people vaccinated. They need to get rid of this liability.

Purebloodpatriot
Purebloodpatriot
10 months ago

They are trying to jab as many people as possible so that their great reset aka depopulation plan work. If I get sick I will take my Ivermectin that I stashed just in case and leave rest to God. When i searched where I can get ivm on google I couldn’t find exactly what I was looking for. Every search query was censored. If I can save 1 person that will use this product instead of going to icu and plugged into ventilators that will burst her/his lungs. that is enough for me. I feel good when I put a spoke in big pharma’s wheel. If you want to get Ivermectin you can visit https://ivmpharmacy.com

Last edited 10 months ago by Purebloodpatriot
Shannon
Shannon
10 months ago

Perhaps people who already were immunocompromised or perceived themselves more likely to die of covid are primarily those who have gotten triple vaxed, and, therefore the numbers merely reflect the ineffectiveness of the vax, not an increase in vaccine-induced illness.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Source: Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have devel… […]

tfwimbling
tfwimbling
10 months ago

One problem: The authors didn’t address the likelihood that the percentage of highly susceptible people in the vaccinated populations was significantly higher than in the unvaccinated population.

Present
Present
10 months ago

By the above numbers, the 13 Million will be picking up the pieces while grieving the loss of very many lives. God have mercy

trackback
10 months ago

[…] De siste offisielle Covid-19-tallene fra Canadas regjering er virkelig skremmende. De viser at den dobbeltvaksinerte befolkninga over hele Canada nå har mistet i gjennomsnitt 74 % av immunsystemets evne, og den trippelvaksinerte befolkninga over hele Canada har nå mistet i gjennomsnitt 73 % av immunsystemets evne sammenlignet med det naturlige immunsystemet til uvaksinerte mennesker. Dette skriver Daily Exposé. […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] De siste offisielle Covid-19-tallene fra Canadas regjering er virkelig skremmende. De viser at den dobbeltvaksinerte befolkninga over hele Canada nå har mistet i gjennomsnitt 74 % av immunsystemets evne, og den trippelvaksinerte befolkninga over hele Canada har nå mistet i gjennomsnitt 73 % av immunsystemets evne sammenlignet med det naturlige immunsystemet til uvaksinerte mennesker. Dette skriver Daily Exposé. […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Canada’s data shows that the double vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 74% of their immune system capability, and the triple vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 73% of their immune system capability compared to the natural immune system of unvaccinated people, according to a report on the data by the Daily Expose.  […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Canada’s data shows that the double vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 74% of their immune system capability, and the triple vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 73% of their immune system capability compared to the natural immune system of unvaccinated people, according to a report on the data by the Daily Expose.  […]

Richard
Richard
10 months ago

We already knew. It’s Genocide. I want to see Trudeau and Fauci and Freeland rot in jail.

Tim
Tim
10 months ago

Your calculations of first doses are wrong as they do not start in your above charts how many people in the country have been vaccinated. 32,386,600 (86.68%)have had their first dose. You are basing it on cases of people with different doses. Re-do your math to adjust.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] 20. Mars 2022 The Expose: Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have devel… […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] The Exposé, 20 mar 2022 […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] March 20, 2022Official Government of Canada data is truly terrifying; it suggests the Triple Vaccinated have devel… […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] 🔗Official Government of Canada data suggests the Triple Vaccinated have developed AIDS & are now… […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] News) The latest figures out of Canada suggest that on average across the country, those who got “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] News) The latest figures out of Canada suggest that on average across the country, those who got “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] News) The latest figures out of Canada suggest that on average across the country, those who got “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] is the result of evil in power. 🔗Source 🔘Join: […]

John
John
10 months ago

Simply fake. Only the first 5 prints (those with source links below them) are legit. The other charts are simply false. Take the second bar chart, the one about population size vaccination, for example (why does it not have the Wayback Machine source link like the first ones?). It shows that between 21-27 Feb 2022 there was ~35,8% of unvaccinated people, but when you go to the oficial source here: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccination-coverage/ you can see that in 20 Feb 2022 the unvaccinated people were around 15,4% of the population. 

Take some legit prints with valid sources to get credibility and then put fake ones to make your deductions. Nice try. If you don’t go deep, you easily get baited by this.

D-O double G
D-O double G
Reply to  John
10 months ago

You must include all people under age 5 in unvaccinated category. All the stats about vaxx rates are for the eligible population over age 5. When you include all Canadians under age 5, the population of unvaccinated is much higher then 14-15%, it is around 1/3 of population, ~13 milliion. Stats taken directly from government of canada

D-O double G
D-O double G
Reply to  D-O double G
10 months ago

on second thought it appears the gov of Canada data only includes 12/13 jurisdictions which creates the effect of greater population of unvaccinated

trackback
10 months ago

[…] News) The latest figures out of Canada suggest that on average across the country, those who got “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Canadian Data: Triple-Jabbed getting VAIDS […]

capsul
capsul
10 months ago

“Among the twelve jurisdictions that have reported case-level vaccine history data to PHAC, a total of 25.0 million people have received at least one dose”
This data from Government of Canada is misleading. There are 13, not 12 jurisdictions in Canada. It doesn’t even say which jurisdictions are these. Such an easy job to misinform with this data, as this article does.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] claims appeared in an article (archived here) published by The Exposé on March 20, 2022, under the title “Official […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] У тройных привитых развился СПИД, и теперь вероятность умереть от Covid-19 в 5,1 раза выше, чем у непри Последние данные из Канады показывают, что в среднем по стране те, кто получил «полную вакцинацию» от COVID-19, потеряли около трех четвертей своей иммунной системы. По сравнению с естественной иммунной системой непривитых людей, у людей, привитых дважды и трижды, ослаблена примерно на 74% и 73% соответственно способность их поврежденной иммунной системы бороться с любыми болезнями. Как и больные СПИДом, полностью привитые, у которых, как мы теперь знаем , полномасштабный вакцино-индуцированный СПИД (VAIDS), восприимчивы ко всем возникающим заболеваниям. Многие из них, вероятно, умрут в ближайшие месяцы и годы из-за этого. «Официальные данные показывают, что у них в среднем в 3,7 раза больше шансов заразиться COVID-19 и в 5,1 раза больше шансов умереть от болезни, чем у невакцинированного населения», — сообщает Daily Exposé.https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/20/gov-canada-data-triple-vaccinated-have-a-i-d-s/ […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Canada’s data shows that the double vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 74% of their immune system capability, and the triple vaccinated population across Canada has now lost on average 73% of their immune system capability compared to the natural immune system of unvaccinated people, according to a report on the data by the Daily Expose.  […]