Breaking News

Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to Office for National Statistics

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Official figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that deaths per 100,000 among double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were on average 91% higher than deaths per 100,000 among unvaccinated 18-39-year-olds between January 2021 and January 2022.

This means it can no longer be denied that the Covid-19 vaccines are deadly because even the official Government published figures now prove it.


The Exposé reports the facts the mainstream refuse to. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…

Follow The Exposé on Telegram
Join The Exposé’s Telegram Discussion Group


The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK. It is responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels.

Its latest dataset on deaths in England by vaccination status can be found here. It contains a large amount of data on age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022.

Table 2 of the dataset contains data on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for all deaths in England. The following table shows an example of how the numbers are presented in the dataset –

What immediately catches the eye when looking at this data is the mortality rate per 100,00 person-years among 18-39-year-olds in the month of January 2021. The figures show the death rate among the unvaccinated in this month was 67.7 deaths per 100,000 person-years. Whilst the death rate among the partly vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) was 119.9 deaths per 100,000 years.

This shows that vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were more likely to die in January 2021, suggesting the Covid-19 injections increased the risk of death or played a part in causing death. So we dug further and extracted all the figures on 18-39-year-olds for each month between January 2021 and January 2022, and this is what we found –

The above chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England. The green line is the mortality rate among the unvaccinated, which while fluctuating has remained pretty stable throughout.

The other lines however represent different vaccination statuses, and they are extremely concerning. The orange, yellow, and pink lines represent mortality rates within 21 days of receiving a first, second or third dose. And they reveal that the risk of death increases significantly immediately after vaccination.

This may explain why figures found in ‘table 4’ of the same ONS dataset reveal 41,449 people died within 21 days of vaccination in England between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22 –

But the most concerning figures are the mortality rates among those vaccinated at least 21 days ago, which you can see more clearly in the following chart –

Around June 2021, there is a cross over from those who’ve received one dose to those who’ve received two doses in terms of the increased mortality rate against the unvaccinated. This obviously tallies with when each injection was administered to this age group. But what’s most concerning here is that the second injection seems to make things much worse in terms of the risk of death.

In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the unvaccinated equated to 67.7. This then fell month on month to 33.1 in May, before increasing again in June to 44.8. The same however cannot be said for those who had received a single dose at least 21 days prior to their death.

In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the partly vaccinated equated to 119.9. Meaning the mortality rate was 77% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. This then fell to 68.3 deaths per 100,000 in February, before climbing to 90.1 in March, then 108.8 in April.

This means at this point the mortality rate among the partly vaccinated was 193.3% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. But not long after following the second dose being administered things get even worse.

The highest mortality rate among the double vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) occurred in September 2021, with 125.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years. In the same month, the mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 46.8. Meaning the double vaccinated mortality rate was 169% higher than the unvaccinated mortality rate.

But the largest statistical difference occurred in November 2021. The mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 33.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years, whereas the mortality rate among the double vaccinated equated to 107. A difference of 220.4%.

The following chart shows the average-age standardised mortality rate to have occurred between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22 by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England –

The average mortality rate throughout these 13 months among the unvaccinated equates to 43.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years. But ignoring the mortality rate within the first 21 days of vaccination, we find that this is actually the lowest mortality rate among all vaccination statuses, and these include Covid-19 deaths in the rates.

The average partly vaccinated (At least 21 days ago) mortality rate equates to 66.3 deaths per 100,000. Whilst the average double vaccinated (At least 21 days ago) mortality rate equates to 84.02 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22.

The average triple vaccinated mortality rate is also higher than the unvaccinated rate at 55 deaths per 100,000. But it’s worth noting here that there is only a couple of months’ data available on the third jab, so we need to wait for the next update to paint a clearer picture of what’s going on with that third dose, but the picture is already not looking very pretty.

So what these official figures from the UK’s Office for National Statistics strongly suggest is that Covid-19 vaccination kills and increases a person’s risk of death due to any cause, possibly by the havoc it reaps on both the cardiovascular and central nervous systems.

And it appears each additional dose makes things worse. On average the one-dose vaccinated were 51% more likely to die than the unvaccinated between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22.

On average the double vaccinated were 91.4% more likely to die than the unvaccinated between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22.

And based on the small amount of data available so far, on average the triple vaccinated are on average 25.3% more likely to die than the unvaccinated, but we’ll have to wait for the next ONS dateset to see if the pattern of that mortality-rate increasing holds true.

But either way, it can no longer be denied that the Covid-19 vaccines are deadly because even the official Government published figures now prove it.

Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Angela Nguyen
Angela Nguyen

My this month’s online income is $19898. I am a full time student and work for only 2 hours a day. Everybody can get this job and earn in part time from home easily. See this website for details…..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>https://www.incomesboost.com

Last edited 5 days ago by Angela Nguyen
ficifo
ficifo

This year now its very very easy to earn more income online. start using this job and earn more than $15000 every month very easily. now its time for you to change your life. check this website for info.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.Homzjob.Com

Last edited 4 days ago by ficifo
Paul Watson
Paul Watson
5 days ago

Lucky they were safe and effective…

Veronica Ward
Veronica Ward
Reply to  Paul Watson
5 days ago

Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 5 days ago by Veronica Ward
trackback
5 days ago

[…] 8.  !!! Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… […]

Sheila Mayer
Sheila Mayer

I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>  https://www.hmjobz.com

Last edited 5 days ago by Sheila Mayer
Freeman2
Freeman2
5 days ago

If covid jabs were so deadly, one would expect the (all cause) death increase for vaxxed to be a lot more than 90% (which is less than double) compared to un-vaxxed…

Data used is only age-standardised per 100k persons, and doesn’t account for the increasing percentage of vaxxed in the population from beginning of 2021 up to end of January 2022!

It should be obvious to anyone that if a majority of people is vaxxed, it is normal to expect that this category (vaxxed) account also for the majority of all cause death.

MONIKA
MONIKA
Reply to  Freeman2
4 days ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…GOOD LUCK.. https://www.workbz.com

Last edited 4 days ago by MONIKA
Ted Gunderson
Ted Gunderson
Reply to  Freeman2
4 days ago

Go get your second booster soon please

Freeman2
Freeman2
Reply to  Ted Gunderson
4 days ago

You got it wrong! I am anti vax in general, I believe the covid jab is related to the Mark of the Beast, hence should be avoided at all costs! not only because of its known & unknown health effects on the recipients and the fact that this experiment qualifies as a crime against humanity according to the Nürnberger Kodex.

I also believe that “viruses” have never been proven to exist, thus virology is no better than astrology. Andrew Kaufman and Stefan Lanka have brought light into this matter.

Yet I can’t approve misleading information such as here oftentimes presented, just because it’s antivax! Claims such as “official data shows” whereas actually it’s the (wrong) interpretation of the data by the article’s author are no better than the “official” (mis)information.

It is clear that this covid jab has more side effects, incl. death, than all other previous vaccines combined. And all that for no benefit! The supposed protection for a few months is illusory.

However, I tend to notice a similar dishonest exaggeration on the “right” side of the covid issue, as the official propaganda pushing the “extreme danger” posed by the “new coronavirus”! I find this very unfortunate!

Where is the _significant_ all cause excess mortality in the year 2021?! If you listened to initial predictions made by people such as Sherry Tenpenny, most covid-jabbed people should be dead by now! I don’t see anything like that happening!

Celeste Bonin
Celeste Bonin
Reply to  Freeman2
4 days ago

Make money by creating an easy and quick strategy to work part time and get extra 30k or more on the internet. I earned 30,485 in my overtime in the previous month and am extremely happy with this work now. You can try this now by:-
.
Following this information:- http://www.WorkStar24.com

Last edited 4 days ago by Celeste Bonin
Freeman
Freeman
Reply to  Freeman2
3 days ago

It does account for increasing vaxed, because it is recalculated to express 100k of EACH group. So it’s an equal measure. It’s also not age confounded because it’s outside the group that’s likely to die of covid. So covid probably plays little part in it. It will show in all cause mortality if you take out the older age groups you should be able to see it clearly surely.

Freeman2
Freeman2
Reply to  Freeman
1 day ago

You’re right, they are indeed related to the number of people in each category. I got it from the original data, which I found here:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

There, download this .xlsx file:
Deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022 edition of this dataset
xlsx (396.7 KB)

Data used in the article is from table 2.

(the PCR “test” is meaningless, and so is any covid data based on it; thus, this garbage info should never be considered for any statistics!)

As a curiosity I looked also at table 3, and it appears the data is manipulated to show the opposite of what it actually shows…

UNBELIEVABLE

see data for all causes of death

for “Unvaccinated”:
mortality rate in table 3 (column E, row 5): 2438.3
but if you compute it from data in columns C & D you get: 705.8
it’s from row 5: (C/D)*100,000

for “ever Vaccinated”:
mortality rate in table 3 (column E, row 13): 940.2
but if you compute it from data in columns C & D you get: 1408
it’s from row 13: (C/D)*100,000

So, the actual data shows that the all causes mortality rate for all ever covid vaxxed (1408) is about twice that for unvaxxed (705.8)

but the respective data given in the table precomputed by the ‘officials?’ shows the opposite: the all causes mortality rate for all ever covid vaxxed (940.2) is less than half of that for unvaxxed (2438.3)!

steve green
steve green
Reply to  Freeman2
1 day ago

You don’t understand the graphs or stats involved, obviously. Look up the word ‘per’, as in ‘per 100,000’. OMG, you’re stupid or deceitful.

Freeman2
Freeman2
Reply to  steve green
1 day ago

Maybe you know what “percent” means? Ever attended school, smart guy?

When you say, e.g., 20 percent (20%), you mean 20 out of 100, which is the ratio 20/100=0.2 but in order to deal with more ‘normal’ numbers you multiply the ratio with 100 and say it’s per cent (100).

Similarly for “per 100k” (aka ‘pcm’ or per cent mille). You don’t want to present data with difficult to follow numbers, such as, e.g., this ratio: 0.007058 (103234 out of 14625337), so you multiply it in this case with 100k to look better, such as 705.8, and say it’s per 100k…

Got it?

Joe
Joe
Reply to  Freeman2
16 hours ago

This was entertaining… Thanks Freeman2

Freeman2
Freeman2
Reply to  Joe
7 hours ago

You’re welcome to the party…

Freeman2
Freeman2
Reply to  Freeman2
7 hours ago

I think it may be useful here to show an example of how statistics can be used to manipulate, without any apparent wrongdoings.

Now that I took the time to look at the original ONS data underlying the presentation in this article
(article which, mea culpa for prematurely jumping to conclusions, I initially suspected of this kind of inaccurately presenting the data, because I didn’t see any statement to the contrary; just after looking at the ONS data used to compute those rates, I saw that it was ok)
I will present a numerical example (unrelated to any real data) just to show what I mean in a simplified, easy to understand way.

Let’s consider 2 categories of population over a given period of time which differ only in their vaxx status (like in the real statistics):

The un-vaxxed number 300, out of which 3 died (all causes), and the vaxxed number 700, out of which 7 died (all causes).

Here we can look at / present this data in the following 2 ways, which convey a different image of the situation…

– The actual meaningful way (from our perspective of interest here) is to compare the death rates computed as:
3/300=0.01 or 1% compared to 7/700=0.01 or 1%

– The other way is to relate the deaths of vaxxed & un-vaxxed respectively, to the total number of population considered, namely 1000 (=300+700), and compare the death rates computed as:
3/1000=0.003 or .3% compared to 7/1000=0.007 or .7%

As one can see, the second case (while legit statistics in itself) skews the image to ‘favour’ the un-vaxxed, showing a more than double increase in the death rate of vaxxed compared to un-vaxxed… whereas from the first case we know the 2 rates are actually equal!

trackback
4 days ago

[…] – Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… […]

trackback
4 days ago

[…] Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… Official figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that deaths per 100,000 among double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were on average 91% higher than deaths per 100,000 among unvaccinated 18-39-year-olds between January 2021 and January 2022. […]

trackback
2 days ago

[…] Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… […]

trackback
2 days ago

[…] But either way, it can no longer be denied that the Covid-19 vaccines are deadly because even the official Government published figures now prove it.  Read More […]

hydranc
hydranc
1 day ago

Looks like twitter bots are everywhere to disrupt truth and the fact that Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and WHO is run by evil men with a God complex.

Daniel
Daniel
1 day ago

And of course, the UK couldn’t care less.

Shoah Kahn
Shoah Kahn
1 day ago

Now, “monkeypox” in the U. K. — to add to the hepatitis, strokes, heart attacks, aggressive cancers…

>destroy the natural immune system => open the floodgates to latent diseases
>ipso facto

Mr. Myxpyx
Mr. Myxpyx
1 day ago

I think they are all 100% likely to die.

cato
cato
1 day ago

Here’s a real statistic: everyone dies eventually.

trackback
1 day ago

[…] Exposé – Article – Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… […]

trackback
1 day ago

[…] May 14, 2022  |  No Comments Fully Vaccinated Young Adults are 92% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Young Adults according to… […]

trackback
1 day ago

[…] By: Expose News, May 14, 2022 (hat tip Ben Armstrong): […]

No negroes here
No negroes here
9 hours ago

Should have used every one of those hood negroes in Chicago, New York and the remaining cities, that are infested with the 57 IQ trash as “test subjects” for the “vaccine”. No loss.

Paul Prichard
Paul Prichard
8 hours ago

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2022-05-18. Pfizer’s huge fraud in its jab research. 70 Secret Royalty Payments @ NIH. Severe pemphigus vulgaris (blog, gab, tweet).