“Net Zero is a nebulous term; it means nothing,” Dan McTeague said in September. “It’s a marketing term. There is no scientific definition of ‘Net Zero.’ It is a scam, a marketing scam. ‘Net Zero’ means whatever the people using it want it to mean, whatever helps them push their new idea to frustrate consumers.”
On Thursday, writing in the Western Standard he explained why he believes Net Zero will fail – in part because achieving it would be unimaginably expensive.
“But the fact Net Zero will ultimately fail doesn’t mean attempting it isn’t going to negatively affect your daily life,” he warned. “The implications of Net Zero are broad and overreaching. And they will have the effect of fundamentally affecting our quality of life.”
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Call Out ‘Net Zero’ For What It Is, A Scam
By Dan McTeague as published by the Western Standard
Net Zero emissions by 2050. Have you heard this line? It is increasingly hard to miss. Every trendy business, bank, corporation and government boasts about their commitment to it. But what exactly do they mean by it?
In short, Net Zero by 2050 means our country either emits no greenhouse gases or offsets whatever it does emit through measures such as buying carbon credits or investing in carbon capture technology.
Net Zero has been a central project of groups such as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and other globalist institutions. They’ve spent the past several years pressuring governments around the world to commit to Net Zero and to make those commitments legally binding, so it will be difficult for elected officials to roll them back in the future.
That’s what’s happening here in Canada. This has been a major priority for Justin Trudeau. The Liberals have spent years championing the push to Net Zero, mandating it by law in 2021.
But law or not, Net Zero isn’t actually going to happen.
It is a ludicrous goal, in part because achieving it would be unimaginably expensive. So expensive, in fact, governments the world over don’t even attempt to estimate the total cost. Whenever they’re asked, they just say: “The cost of doing nothing will be higher.” But if they don’t know how expensive their own plan is, how on earth could they know that it would be cheaper than not doing it?
External estimates place the cost for Canada alone somewhere in the neighbourhood of $2 trillion. That number is so staggering it is impossible to fully comprehend it. It is more than our nation’s entire Gross Domestic Product! Look at it this way – that is the equivalent of spending $1 a second for 63,417 years.
But the fact Net Zero will ultimately fail doesn’t mean attempting it isn’t going to negatively affect your daily life. It will.
Under the umbrella of Net Zero you’ll find:
- Carbon taxes
- Clean Fuel Standards
- Just Transition
- Emissions caps
- Cancelled pipelines
- Electrification strategies
- Gas and diesel car bans
- Electric vehicle subsidies
- Costly building codes
- Curtailed food production
The list goes on and on.
But beyond the economic impact and the personal hardship, we must remember the end game of this Green Agenda isn’t really about reducing carbon emissions. No, it is much more insidious than that.
At the heart of this Net Zero movement is a desire to fundamentally change our economy and way of life. They are looking for a complete transition from the economy that has made Canada the great nation that it is.
“You will own nothing and be happy.” Remember those words attributed to Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”)? Well, take those words to heart, because he means it.
The implications of Net Zero are broad and overreaching. And they will have the effect of fundamentally affecting our quality of life.
It will make energy more expensive. It will raise the cost of everything. It will make us less competitive in the global economy, especially against countries such as China because, you will not be surprised to learn, China has not signed on to this suicide pact. (But they are keen for other countries to stifle their economy in pursuit of this absurd goal, not least because they produce 70% of the world’s solar panels.)
Net Zero regulations, policies and mandates are a direct assault on affordable energy and an affordable way of life. That is the goal of the Green agenda, and if they have their way, Canada, its standard of living and its way of life will suffer.
Net Zero is a scam.
About the Author
Some Canadians know Dan McTeague as the Liberal Member of Parliament who served Pickering-Scarborough East from 1993 to 2011. He gained fame and tons of affection from ordinary citizens and taxpayers for his weekly radio spots ‘Gas Price Watch’ during which explained where the price of gas at the pump would be going, and why.
Later he founded ‘Gas Price Buddy’. In 2019 he left Gas Buddy and launched ‘Gas Price Wizard’. Most recently, he launched ‘Canadians for Affordable Energy’ (“CFAE”). CFAE is an advocacy organisation promoting and advocating for policies and initiatives aimed at ensuring affordable and reliable energy for Canadian consumers. It is a reliable source of common sense and fact-based information spouting none of the “Net Zero” or “Green Energy” prose commonly used.
You can follow McTeague on Twitter HERE.

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support belowV support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
I despair at of the lack of logic.
The properties of CO2 are known and understood. After an initial limited warming by photons direct from the sun, this warming declines on a log basis, at current CO2 levels no measurable heat was detected confirmed by repeatable experiment. ( ref The Penn University, and ref Prof William Happer and 1400+ CLINTEL scientists.
As CO2 can not possibly cause a crisis of climate, Net zero can make no difference at all.
Net zero does make a difference. Zero life.
Does make a difference?
Or would if implemented, that is why we must avoid the moronic solution to a non problem.
Precisely: we only contribute a fraction of the current 400ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere, and 1600ppm would create a greener vitalized Planet as it once was in the past, since CO2 is the plant’s “gas of life”
The satanists want 0ppm (net zero) to implement extermination of all of God’s natural life in favour of synthetic biology.
No plants means no oxygen (OUR “gas of life”) for people.
At around 60GHz 5G radiation creates oxygen states that our blood cannot utilize, so they are using a pincer effect to annihilate us: aluminium in chemtrails also kills plant life and pollinators (proven by Nikki Florio of Bee Heroic).
Net Zero is population control. It is also a means in which Satan gathers the worlds wealth unto himself. This way he can prevent you from eating to survive unless you worship him and take the mark of the beast. The Bible declares this will happen. Satan wants to be worshipped. Who is your god? “Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures and that he was buried and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures. 1 Corinthians 15:3b-4. Jesus is God!
The Kingdom of the Beast is rapidly being built.
https://russia.postsen.com/local/537869/The-presidential-decree-on-nature-like-technologies-continues-to-be-discussed-in-Irkutsk-Victor-Kuzevanov-This-is-our-inevitable-future.html
Wow. And lol :
..
‘Gas Price Wizard’, the last article:
https://gaswizard.ca/global-fuel-supply-outlook-fall-2023/
Gas Price Wizard’, the last article, continued:
https://gaswizard.ca/global-fuel-supply-outlook-fall-2023/
WTF?! WOW. And lol
Or, in other words:
How to write hundreds of critical articles against the green program while offering an alternative program that is the same as the green program. (*By agreeing and disclosing as facts, all the main false talking points of the green program of fraudsters.)
by Dan McTeague
Well, ok : – )
[…] Articol original: https://expose-news.com/2023/11/18/achieving-net-zero-will-be-so-expensive/ […]
[…] Read more: Achieving “Net Zero” will be so expensive no Government will even attempt to Estimate… […]
[…] Achieving “Net Zero” will be so expensive no Government will even attempt to Estimate the Total … “Net Zero is a nebulous term; it means nothing,” Dan McTeague said in September. “It’s a marketing term. There is no scientific definition of ‘Net Zero.’ It is a scam, a marketing scam. ‘Net Zero’ means whatever the people using it want it to mean, whatever helps them push their new idea to frustrate consumers.” […]
[…] Read more: Achieving “Net Zero” will be so expensive no Government will even attempt to Estimate… […]
Apart from Non-compliance and the “198 Methods of Non-violent Action” (which can be shared far and wide), We the People need to stop using the tools with which the satanists plan to enslave us: “Smart” phones/meters/cars/cities etc. and seek to remove the infrastructure to support these devices (5G kill grid and ULEZ towers etc.).
We then need to stop their air superiority which is a guarantee to win any war, i.e. tall towers, drones, chemtrailers, satellites etc.
We the People need to be organized as they are, to put our heads together and list solutions then take action, including refusal to register to vote for globalists or spoil ballot papers with “I do not give consent”.
Stipulate “I do not consent” in accordance with the English language, not Legalese.
I could be construed as “aye”.
Do is affirmative, not negative.
Not could be construed as “knot”.
“Consent is revoked/removed” would be a better option.
Presumption of consent is revoked, is another option.
Or “None of These”
“Non” is the negative that doesn’t have a legalese alternative. None, nun.
When dealing with criminals who weaponize the language against you, it is better to be specific.
im fully net zero,. sorry 1 sec just getting my starbucks delivery,…ahhh i love getting a cup of tea delivered from 5 miles away by motorbike courier 😉