Breaking News

There’s microcircuitry inside the Covid injections, says Australian doctor

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Australian general practitioner Dr. David Nixon joined Ikonic to briefly discuss what he has found in Covid injections.  He believes the objects he has seen under the microscope, after consulting with others, are components of microcircuitry.

Samples of Covid injections are not easily obtainable, but Dr. Nixon has managed to obtain four Pfizer Covid “vaccine” vials and place samples of them under the microscope.  The four vials were from the same manufacturing batch.  Although he has only managed to examine four vials, his findings are similar to those of La Quinta Columna and other researchers around the world.

David Icke: What’s Inside The ‘Vaccine’? – Dr David Nixon Shows Right Now the Contents Under the Microscope,
9 December 2022 (11 mins)

Further reading:

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

4.1 11 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

86 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Islander
Islander
1 month ago

Surprised? Not me!
As a ‘layman’ I won’t get “clever above my station”, but one thing I do know is that there aint anything good in the covid jabs.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

You can check Islander, anyone can just how I did a year ago or so when the truth was so terrible that I believed it only when I saw it with my own eyes.
OLD android or new + installed Bluetooth Scanner. It will show them all, the vaxxed people, the MAC addresses they emit. They are able to cause sickness in anyone who is sensitive if there is a crowd and you stuck in it.
Of course many are ill and dying or dead, how the natural electromagnetic of the human body could cope with this. They are all antennas, receivers and transmitters – and they even don’t know why they are so sick.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

There was a military project in the eighties called the Big MAC which developed a vaccine to be injected in all mobile microchips for geo localisation purposes.
It has been implemented since the mid-nineties and now all injected or coated electronic devices have a MAC address.
GundelP you are genius !

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

Doubt anyone here would disagree that the jabs are no good, and I appreciate your humility. But science is about specifics, and this article and “evidence” are way short on that, no matter what may or may not surprise us these strange days.

Here we have a drunk-sounding (or perhaps jabbed and stroking out) GP – a family doctor, not an expert in microscopy, microelectronics, or any pertinent domain, speculating vaguely and ineloquently and attempting to be very much “clever above his station”.

And given the credulity in evidence below, “clever above one’s station” must be as contagious as the so-called covid.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Here is some science to you, more groups’ findings, analysis, police involved, what one can do, etc.
Take your time please.
https://nzdsos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Presentation-Microtech.pdf

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

That is a good compendium of evidence – and thank you for it. However, it’s still problematic.

My (non-expert) eyes see a lot of 90-degree angles and everything I know about carbon-based forms (graphene, etc.) indicate it should be 60-degree. We should see hexagons, not squares, and there’s only one image with the former. That there are both only implies more unanswered questions – and not trivial ones. Further, there’s way too much diversity of the forms (let’s just take the square ones) for there to be an answer as to what they do.

If there was a plan and purpose for this “tech”, there would have to be a somewhat straight line between form and function. To be or do anything “electronic” (outlandish as that suggestion is in the water-world of biology), there would have to be far more consistency in form than we’re seeing. The something being made would need to follow a much more consistently structured template and the product would need to be identifiable as a distinct item that we could name – oh look, there’s another so-and-so model. At the other end of the spectrum of possibility, if these structures are just there to act as the backbones of the clot formations, then consistency of form would not matter in the same way and any structure would do.

We’re seeing endless unique structures here. Each one is different, not replicas of distinct species or models. And that doesn’t square with a conclusion of anything more technologically sophisticated than the things at the low end of the spectrum, such as clot-makers. The hypothesis of what these things do has to match the hypothesis of what they are, and there must be a compehensive explanation to account for everything seen under all microscopes.

At this point, I don’t think it’s controversial to notice all the debris of many kinds in the observed samples, and there’s emerging consensus that the manufacturing quality control standards have been and are abysmal, that contamination with all manner of materials is the standard. That, too, would better account for what we’re seeing, which is a vast diversity of matter, small and large, manufactured and natural, from crystals to metals to glass and beyond. But that still leaves open the questions of what this stuff is, why it’s there, and what it does – intended and unintended consequences.

These are fundamental questions to address way before concluding that this is what is claimed – recognizing that the claims range from actual, manufactured microelectronics to self-assembling carbon-based structures that interact with EMFs to produce de-facto electronic apparati, to strings and tubes and sheets and crystals whose purpose cannot be deduced from their forms, to the uncountable bits of junk in the background of all the images. It’s like the gorilla experiment where when you’re told to look at one thing you don’t notice everything else, so everyone is looking at the big thing in the middle and not asking what all the crap in the background is.

For every assertion you make without a tight and qualified frame, there are far more questions implied.

Step back from the conclusions and keep questioning.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

What’s clear to me after listening more to your own evidence is that you are not listening to (or, more likely, understanding) same. Detail and nuance matter.

Over and out.

Bob
Bob
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Boris and co need angin

koppykat
koppykat
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

He has an obvious speech impediment. In his first interview release of this finding ( with Maria Zeee ) he simply is presenting this latest discovery and both they – calling out for “experts” in this field to please look at this and help us understand what we are witnessing. This is just a further presentation of these findings. Are people not allowed to present their research and call out for more expertise to pick up on where they can’t further extrapolate any claims, themselves?
Why is it a person has to be met with attack on their person and knocked out cold with a backhand blow at their “insufficient” credentials? All when any of us viewers knows almost nothing about them.
Dr David Nixon has shown nothing short of bravery (in today’s climate of threat upon anyone who dares speak on a truth)..and does so, purely to ask can anyone “qualified” out there, please help to determine these findings. You should be ashamed for your insulting remarks. Lift people up! especially at this critical time in human history and stop wasting valuable time, and help.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  koppykat
1 month ago

You’re right: shame on me for joining a false debate and debasing others and myself with insults.

I wish that curious people were indeed doing what you suggest: pointing out anomalies and asking good questions. But they’re not. They’re coming to conclusions and giving the credulous masses wild notions to believe in that deepen fear and ignorance.

There is mis/dis/malinformation on all sides of this. We who actually want to know truth need to stay to the agnostic, skeptical, rational, reasoned, evidence-based, fear-mitigating, calm middle path.

koppykat
koppykat
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Fair enough, but what I see is some of us are still very “human” and Dr Nixon is just bringing this to our attention in case it is of real significance. I saw the interview with ICKE as more of just a chat between fellow humans. We are not all qualified experts in any field ( whatever qualified means – really).
So it was sub-par…I am fascinated nonetheless to see what anyone’s findings are, I am truly invested in learning and any evidence/findings people are “willing” to share has my attention. My smarts will do the rest.
I agree the overwhelming silence all round – from our so-called expert pool…is deafening. Yet it is the very thing which has seen an unqualified voice speak out, to anyone who’ll listen…and say “look what I have found”.
That’s all. I didn’t take Nixon’s speculations as a serious stake in the game – at all, I simply appreciated it, and move on.
It is indeed the thing I am most grappling with, how to not create any more fear than is already the case – with others – but that horse has already bolted. The masses will eventually catch up in their own time. We absolutely need to shine light on any truth/evidence we come upon.
It is human to speculate.

I applaud your “measured’ high standard of proof and testimony required and agree. Perhaps we both need to shake the tree a whole lot harder than we have been – or wake the lions up….more lions

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  koppykat
1 month ago

Lovely reply. I’ll second you on all of it.

Splish_Splash
Splish_Splash
1 month ago

It would be fascinating to find out percentage of people in this country, USA, who simply refuse to believe this fact, and the percentage of people in the word who simply cannot hear this. I suspect the number of people in this nation who refuse would stagger my mind!

Bob
Bob
Reply to  Splish_Splash
1 month ago

Just starting hear they will criminal

Peter Sutton
Peter Sutton
1 month ago

Absolute nonsense !
Dr Ryan Cole analysed the Pfizer J&J and Moderna “vaccines here…

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-highwires-lab-investigation-of-covid-vaccines/

raj patel
raj patel
Reply to  Peter Sutton
1 month ago

Well, Dr Ryan Cole claimed the rectangular structures were from metal flaking off the syringe needle – however, these definitely look like microcircuit boards such as in smart dust: https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/09/smart-dust-a-tiny-part-of-what-theyve-got-planned-for-you/

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  raj patel
1 month ago

No, Dr. Cole said the rectangular structures were cholesterol crystals. As natural structures, each one would be unique, like snowflakes, and that would better account for the uniqueness of each of the “chips” in these images. Think it through.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Also, the smart dust is orders of magnitude larger than what’s being imaged here under high magnification.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

I am sorry but they are not unique and the parts all can be identified, all can be found in scientific materials. See the link about the MAC phenomenon, they are ALL LISTED.
According to the photos and VIDEOS of these ‘nano computer parts’ they are pretty much the same.

So simply suspect that the rest, new apostoles who showed up a YEAR LATE (during which time they poisoned billion with the covid vaxxes) very likely show you faked material. End of.

These nano circuits and other elements were photographed and published on orwell.city a year ago (who translated the Spanish articles and videos to English), we saw them all.
Feel free to check, that’s the original material, they secured that their proofs stand in any INTERNATIONAL court. In fact they offered to testify, but no one cared – deliberately. Now that they can’t hide the truth anymore and it doesn’t really matter anymore (billions are vaxxed) they try to influence the narrative with half truth – half lies or simply outrageous lies – cholesterol…

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Sorry, you are DEAD WRONG. I have been married to one of the TOP EXPERTS in the field of both electronic circuitry and computer programming for 52 years, and I have been well instructed in what it takes to MANUFACTURE such devices. I also did EXTENSIVE, and I mean EXTENSIVE research on the internet when this claim was first made, and it is UTTER NONSENSE. The doctor in this video does not have a SPECK of expertise in any field that would qualify him to make such claims. These devices DO NOT EXIST. Anything vaguely resembling such devices are orders of magnitude LARGER than these specks.

Another thing to keep in mind: there is the claim there is graphene, or graphene compounds in the shots. It should be noted, graphene forms HEXAGONAL crystals. So these RECTANGULAR forms are not made of graphene, and even if they showed there is graphene in some of the shots, it is completely impossible that this gives rise to microcircuits of any kind.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Sorry Pat, but if your husband spent 52 years on the field, assuming that he became an expert at a very young age, let’s say 25 – 25+52=77 years old at least and pensioner.
These stuffs are pretty new you know.

The MAC addresses are the proof as that’s a protocol, they can’t come without manufacturer and device identified – but they now do.

As about husbands mine is a senior network engineer and I am an MCP (Microsoft Certified Professional) and we haven’t reach the sad age yet when people struggle to absorb and understand new info.

This is a little – and pretty new – video (of La Quinta Columna, this October, the Pfizer) feel free to watch the elements in in it.

“Analysis of A SINGLE Pfizer DROPLET under the optical microscope, as of October 31, 2022. GRAPHENE, GRAPHENE-BASED CARBON NANOTUBES AND GRAPHENE MICRO-SHEETS. This is all that Pfizer’s vaccine contains, apart from MICROTECHNOLOGY.”

https://www.laquintacolumna.info/translations/anlysis-of-a-single-pfizer-droplet-under-the-optical-microscope-as-of-october-31-2022/

Pfizerdrop_22oct.JPG
paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

One, what evidence does anyone here have that Cole is CO? Right. None. He’s one of the most sane, responsible, rational, measured and expert voices out there, and he’s been exactly right all the way through this, as has his a-list cohort.

Two, the MAC address experiment is (or should be) dead easy to do oneself with any cell phone. So do the experiment and report back. And link a video that walks one through the experiment, so everyone can do it.

Three, it’s this sort of fringe “evidence” that makes the “conspiracy theory” epithet so easy to support. It’s one short step from nanotech and graphene to alien seed in the (half)minds of most normies. And this stuff freaks people out, maintains the fear. Not useful.

Science moves slowly in whole, with discontinuities of disruptive theory along the way. Bring the breakthroughs, but allow them to be scientifically validated (experiment or observation replicated and peer reviewed) by the world before taking them on board as belief. Stop being so damn credulous of all the worst possibilities and give time and space for scientific process to produce reliable results.

I don’t know for sure whether there’s nanotech or graphene or alien seed in this already plenty toxic product, but until there is CLEAR evidence supported by enough reliable voices, I’m agnostic and not attached. And all you supporters of this don’t KNOW either, you just believe based on the most scant evidence narrated by people speculating above their expertise.

Watching the just-linked Quinta Columna video (and yes, I’ve watched lots of their stuff), it’s just more vagueness presented by a half-expert. The images – emphatically – DO NOT “speak for themselves”. And yes, we do need to see the “assembly” process and be presented by a coherent, comprehensive theory of what this is and what purpose it’s serving, what damage it’s doing. “Might be” and “maybe” don’t equal “is”.

So far, I haven’t heard any pathologists saying Yes, we’re seeing graphene and nanotech at the core of these long elastic clots. We’ve looked at a large sampling of specimens from around the world and see a consistent pattern of evidence. Please show me if you have any expert saying this.

If there is graphene and nanotech, then it needs to fit the medical evidence, fit into a larger theory and make sense along side all the other evidence we have. Who is promoting such a theory?

So, until such a theory is postulated, wait and keep listening to all voices, but rely only on what we KNOW for sure – or as sure as we can currently be.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Oh, and I forgot to point out that this “GRAPHENE, GRAPHENE-BASED CARBON NANOTUBES AND GRAPHENE MICRO-SHEETS” in the Pfizer’s is “apart from MICROTECHNOLOGY”.

Stop and think about this for a moment.

In the video, what is shown is the “graphene”, but no sightings of the “nanotech”. In Nixon’s video, it’s nanotech but no sightings of graphene. And no sightings of aliens in either.

How does that add up?

If we’re talking about a product like “Pfizer” without making qualified references to batches or suggesting that there is evidence for variance between batches, countries, etc., then the same stuff should be in each vial and observable by anyone. That’s how science works.

Cole’s people (he plus other referenced associates such as in Germany) looked at (about?) 100 vials and saw no graphene or nanotech. It’s not enough to just call him CO and be done, unless you’re a certifiable idiot. There must be a better explanation; and if there is none, then return to uncertainty about the graphene and nanotech until better information is available.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

One, what evidence does anyone here have that Cole is CO? Right. None.
I wish you were right but you are not. It’s not the first from him. He was challenged on the virus topic, too. You can find it on Truthcomestolight – he is either the most ignorant charlatan or a CO. You choose.

Two, the MAC address experiment is (or should be) dead easy to do oneself with any cell phone
What about read and watch materials instead of only parroting a one sided highly questionable opinion?
THEY TRIED TO HIDE IT. Hence only OLD ANDROID shows it or new with Bluetooth Scanner. But they can be shown on an IPhone with a little ‘trick’ (they say). The whole stuff is in this VIDEO, WATCH IT, WILL YOU PLEASE? After that if there is any more question I am happy to answer if I can.

https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

The assembly process is in the video – in fact in many because not only La Quinta Columna showed it. And by the way it is an old science (based on an old science called Tesla poresis)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1d0Lg6wuvc

As about fear, you don’t understand the point. As long as the nanotech works in the vaccinated they can targeted and people dropping like flies. Those MAC must have a purpose.

Better not to know? It is like if you would have cancer and you would chose not to know about it rather than to try to treat it.
And it looks there is ‘treatment’. Again, thanks to La Quinta Columna. I can’t tell it work or not but an engineer on this field probably not only can tell but can built it – at the end of the video there is a drawing how to built the tool TO FRY THE NANOROUTER. Which case you still have the graphene oxide in you – but there is not a ‘cross on you anymore’.

The ‘treatment’ according to La Quinta Columna (apart from that they say and proved that antioxidants and NAC degrade graphene). I wouldn’t try it with a pacemaker though.

“High-voltage electromagnetic pulses (EMP) for frying injected nanotechnology. MAC addresses are disabled.” (Ask your doc or favorite engineer first…)

https://www.brighteon.com/34b1dc95-6c1a-4c35-b98c-012a47060e5a

frying nanorouter.JPG
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I forgot but very IMPORTANT.
Watch the video connected to the photo. They don’t touch the tool to the person, they just generate an electromagnetic field (if we understood it well).

Bob
Bob
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Seem to be a bit nervous

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Bob
1 month ago

Because the world is full with dumb ppl, honor to the exceptions.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

You keep saying the same thing over and over and not answering my reasoned points of doubt.

Bottom line, for me: I’m not telling you there is not graphene and tech in the shots, just telling you that the evidence is thin as hell and those promoting it don’t seem reliable. If you want to believe it as a religious matter just say so, but don’t pretend to have science and reason on your side.

And for the record, any time you have to retreat to brighteon for a source, you’ve already lost your credibility.

Bob
Bob
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Bad people always hang

Bob
Bob
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Prove it

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Right, let’s talk about how credible is Dr Cole – but not with slandering but proof.

https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-joseph-yi-streetmd-with-drs-tom-cowan-andrew-kaufman-mark-bailey-a-response-to-claims-by-drs-robert-malone-peter-mccullough-ryan-cole-that-sars-cov-2-has-been-isolated-is-a-disease-ca/

https://www.laquintacolumna.info/translations/dr-ryan-cole-lied-the-german-scientists-found-graphene-in-the-vaccines/

About the second, Rhoda wrote the case was not clear enough to her. My answer is that Rhoda is the journalist, I guess she can find a way to ask Delgado about the unclear details.

It is vital to know – as we can’t be all professionals on every affected area – that who is credible and who is not.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

This isn’t proof, only opinion. Further, there are (at least) two paradigms or frames in operation (germ theory and terrain/exosome theory) that both have merit.

I respect Cowan, someone my (doctor) father has had long conversations with and whose ideas I was promoting already back in the spring of 2020 (see https://unmasked.icu/1-covid/alternate/exosome/).

Dr. Cole operates solely in the germ theory frame and references fairly conventional and mainstream “facts”, and in that frame, to my knowledge, his claims and statements are “correct”. Dr. Cowan is also “correct” within the frames he uses. So, Dr. Close isn’t “wrong”, and speaking the language of the establishment when one is a public figure of significant influence is only the smart thing to do.

Please don’t get caught up in the right/wrong dichotomy that is largely a false construct. This is a time when we need to expand our frames and concepts to include new ideas, including the whole nanotech revolution that is very real (but doesn’t necessarily mean it’s in the vax).

Trust and verify; but where verification sounds like Dr. Nixon, be skeptical until more steady voices confirm.

Bob
Bob
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

The truth is coming and the bad will be held accountable

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Here’s the link to the Expose’s coverage of Cole’s observations: https://expose-news.com/2022/12/14/ryan-cole-gives-his-insights-into-covid-vaccines/

You can read (so you don’t have to bother to listen): cholesterol.

As of today, Raj Patel, above, has 8+ on his comment incorrectly citing Cole and insisting on hallucinating microcircuits, and I have 1+ for correcting him. That seems to confirm the ratio of delusion to clear-eyed reason in this space.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Peter Sutton
1 month ago

He is fake. He must be, no other explanation.
One of the method they use against us is the ocean of info where you have to play Cinderella to find the few real one among the half-truth half lies or blatant lies.

This is why I told – only La Quinta Columna – because they were the first to discover the nanotech and the first to warn people. Everyone else came after them, many clearly to reduce the harm of the info given by La Quinta Columna. One of the method is this, one says this (different circuits, different this or that) the other says cholesterol crystals – till the level you are so confused you give up.

LA QUINTA COLUMNA IS THE ONLY 100% CREDIBLE SOURCE. Because they were the first to discover graphene oxide in the vaxxes. Without them we might never would know.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Sorry, but NO, EMPHATICALLY NOT. La Quinta Columna may have been the one to make us aware of the possibility of graphene oxide, but that doesn’t mean they know there are microcircuits in the shots, or that they can form. They do not have the expertise to make that claim to begin with. One of them has a degree in engineering, but that doesn’t guarantee he knows anything about THIS field of engineering. They have seriously eroded their claim to credibility by making this latest claim. Dr. Cole said they found NO graphene or graphene compounds in the samples they examined. That doesn’t mean other vials don’t contain graphene. But the fact is, even if La Quinta Columna is right about graphene being in some shots, it doesn’t mean there are MICROCIRCUITS in some shots. WE DO NOT HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO PRODUCE SUCH MICROCIRCUITS, AND IF WE DID, IT WOULD REQUIRE A SPECIAL FLUID, AND IT WOULD NOT HAPPEN IN HUMAN TISSUE OR BLOOD.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

They not even knew, they proved it. Maybe if you try to comment AFTER reading after things properly, cheking proof, etc?

A hint to you and your elderly husband: Charles Lieber, and a photo to help.

As about the scientist working on this tech which – according to you and husband doesn’t exist, the list on the end of the video is 5 minutes long but I am sure they are all fake just because you think.

To HELP YOU I highlighted the studies connecting just to this small part (on the photo), you and your truth hungry husband who are a bit late with today-science might wish to have a look to the full videos, including the studies list?? I see you missed it despite it was here in another comment…

https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

nano_tech_studies.JPG
Bob
Bob
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Doesn’t matter if you haven’t taken it

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Ardis was the first to discover snake venom in the vax. By your logic, that makes him 100% credible. And Phelan discovered that there are two water lines to “every home and office in America”, and the two of them together figured out that this is how the snake venom would be dispensed.

I think it’s time to check your own reasoning and credulity.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Snake venom? That should be a biological material, what is the proof when no one found biological material in them? (No one credible.)
Ardis very fast started to SELL antidotes for the assumed snake venom. La Quinta Columna sells nothing…
Plus they told: watch the water. Snake venoms are peptides and according to Dr Kaufman nothing will happen if you swallow it.

Argue with them if you can.

  1. https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-tom-cowan-biotech-scientist-mike-donio-a-close-up-look-at-the-evidence-of-snake-venom-in-the-virus-in-the-water-supply/
  2. https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-andrew-kaufman-the-straight-truth-on-snake-venom-claims/
  3. https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-tom-cowan-on-the-snake-venom-stuff-covid-caused-by-a-specific-snake-venom-is-looking-like-pure-fantasy-remdesivir-is-definitely-not-snake-venom/

By the way, notice what is what they don’t want to mention no matter what: The nanovax (graphene, nanotech) and 5G (4+, wireless energy) connection.
But they keep you entertained for sure with snake venom and cholesterol tales or mRNA and spike protein tales.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Thought is was clear from my tone, but I think Ardis is an ego-bound fool and Phelan is a flat-out psychiatric case.

Occam’s Razor and a little common sense, please.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Peter Sutton
1 month ago

Hey, I went round and round with people here the last time Expose printed this nonsense. I even took it to a fellow who is fluent in Spanish (I can read Spanish, but that didn’t do me any good viewing La Quinta Columna’s video.) He said he thinks La Quinta Columna is enemy. The English that was superimposed on the video precludes anyone understanding the Spanish. While La Quinta Columna has revealed some good things, they simply do not have the expertise to make this claim in the first place. It’s a false flag. I’m with you all the way. Good luck not getting argued off the internet on this claim. I had to respond countless times against this nonsense the last time Expose published this claim.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Nice try. It’s a shame that it is known that the 77 brigade (misinformation) and 450 000 trusted voices hired by the EU to lead the narrative are among us. Considering the full number probably plenty of them.

He thinks La Quinta Columna is an enemy? Wow, based on what proof exactly? Can we see it? Thanks.

koppykat
koppykat
Reply to  Peter Sutton
1 month ago

He didn’t use electronmicroscopy and no experience whatsoever in describing what he saw under inferior equipment used( not fit for purpose.) Dr Nixon’s samples were also left under room temperatures across time frames noted…and recorded seen self assembly of these nanostructures..and also what appeared to be micro machinery? at work assembling these circuitry chips. see his other videos. Also check out Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna who has been showing us these nano structures for almost 2 years now. These vial samples get busy and contents grow and assemble across timeframes and sometimes under higher temperatures. get busy and do some research..you’ll be shocked. Experts all round the world have been showing us what is happening in jabbed victims blood samples from living and deceased people. You won’t find it on msm..checkout alternative websites.msm blocks the evidence on all fronts.

W. A. O'Gorman
W. A. O'Gorman
1 month ago

Well every one wanted a smartphone and a credit card – now they can be a smartphone and a debit card.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  W. A. O'Gorman
1 month ago
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

My phone and my EMF meter. They use mobiles to zap people. The ice on the cake that it generates ‘covid’ symptoms (aka acute radiation syndrome with the exact same symptoms like a bad flu has)

zapping.JPG
Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Bob Enough, and myself have a TriField Model TF2, how does this compare with your meter-If you know? I didn’t do much research on EMF meters, but as my late father was a Merchant Navy radio Officer, somehow I thought radio waves have, are, and will cause more damage to us.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

Sorry, I don’t know TriField and it is complex anyway because the so called ‘safe’ value is changing by countries (in the UK it is the highest in the whole world) – it means you can’t trust them even if they show green.
You can find additional materials in the docu: Take Back your Power, in Dana Ashlie’s documentary on wireless radiation, or here:
https://www.5gexposed.com/

On my tool you can see that it measured mW/m2 in radio frequency mode, the big numbers are the present value (changing), the bottom the highest value measured during that measuring ‘session’ – in my case it was 2-3 minutes. That it was very high in most of the time you can see on the little window, the heights of the black ‘rods’, almost constantly high. Also can be seen it was in the dangerous (red) area (light at right).

Bob
Bob
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

If you not had the jabs no worries

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Bob
1 month ago

That’s not so easy. In the video (there are more but as an example for now), The Graveyard MAC addresses, they proved that unvaccinated (covid) people can and did have MAC.
There are a couple of possible way for that, swabs (delivery tool with sharp edged hollow fibers), masks (graphene oxide was found and many were recalled and many not), other ‘vaccines’, food, drugs, saline solution, etc.

Plus if you are sensitive it still harmful, if you have metals in you (antennas) still harmful.

paxvialucis
paxvialucis
1 month ago

One swallow does not a summer make.

When I look at these images, I see different “species” of this “tech”, many different sizes and forms, perhaps even to the point that each one is unique. Why and how would that be? If these are microchips, then would they all not be the same? Because consider the opposite: there are many different types that are present by the – what? – thousands, millions in each vial, if one extrapolates from one magnified frame out to the whole? That implies that the manufacturer is making – again, what? – trillions, quadrillions, of these chips and of various types and parting each of them into each vial. Just consider the cost, complexity, logistical challenge of that. And what, specifically, is the theory of purpose?

Then consider that gross particulates of such size would not just float around in the fluid, but would precipitate to the bottom. Each vial would have to shaken with each dose extracted. Is that in the administration instructions?

And that’s just scratching the surface of the sensible counter-arguments.

Occam’s Razor, people. And the cholesterol crystals of the blessed Dr. Cole, whose team looked at 25 times as many vials.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  paxvialucis
1 month ago

Nice try.

nanotech_new1.JPG
Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Sorry, but HOLES are not DEVICES. A hole is not a transistor or a resistor or a diode. It’s a poorly formed crystal of some kind, not a circuit.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Stop joking, right? Among the photos there is a video, too.
it’s micro-tech, period and was not even a nice enough try Pat. Articles coming out about them – by the way – since 2007, with protocol details, etc.

https://www.orwell.city/2022/02/microcircuitry.html

This one is about the nano-‘octopus’ found by Dr Madej, too. What that old charlatan Cole said, what were they?

https://www.orwell.city/2021/12/nanotechnology.html

nanooctopus.JPG
paxvialucis
paxvialucis
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Wonder what they’d see in a Rorschach test.

soundattitude
soundattitude
1 month ago

If you watch the Ryan Cole video (also shared on this page (for the time being at least)) he says that these rectangular shapes are chlorestorol crystals and are pretty common…

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  soundattitude
1 month ago

They must be sweating hard. Magnetic cholesterol. lol, lol.
MAC address emitting cholesterol. Wow.

https://odysee.com/@TheAmericandebtSlave:5/Graveyard-mac-addresses:f

Go and try. Don’t forget you need a Bluetooth scanner application on your android except if it old and possibly Chinese. They didn’t even want to hide it.

bangbangsilverhammer
bangbangsilverhammer
1 month ago

The big microchip in the middle looks like it has a chip mounted light sensor, perhaps for its journey to the retina to detect when the eye is open or closed, it would explain why so many people have gone blind after the jibby jabs. The light sensor chip then provides feedback to the smaller chips so they know when to activate, so they know when the eye is open and the body is awake.

Nature doesn’t create straight lines and right angles. Only man and machine does that. At a nanotechnology level in this case.

Thanks to Ickonic for creating this video and Gareth Icke for his down-to-earth presenting style. Thanks to The Exposé for highlighting the story and video.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  bangbangsilverhammer
1 month ago

Two different kind of sensors at least.(La Quinta Columna) one or more type in the body reporting heart beat, blood pressure, etc. Smaller ones which can cross the blood-brain barriers are to modify behavior and thoughts.

it’s all in studies, all of them. Published.
I linked this video several times, go to the end 5 minutes or so, they listed all of the studies there, anyone can check them.
From 19:55 – the science:

https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Mrs. Grundel, You have so much energy-I don’t know how many words you have typed today? Probably more than I can think!

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

No, I don’t, I try to save lives – that gives some energy but after 3 years of ‘fight’ and pissing opposite to the wind I am tired. It is exhausting when you have to argue with narrative leading bots, trusted voices or even the famous 77 misinfo brigade of the UK. (UK Column’ article, they con us while paid from taxes) while people are dead or dying close to you due that they BELIEVED the lies and went for the poison vax.

Sorry, I missed the actual point of yours?

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I don’t think there was any particular “point” as you aver, only that I have observed that you have an overmuch evangelical zeal to get the truth out as you understand the truth to be. This is no criticism, having said this there is error on all sides.
You’re right about the “77 misinfo brigade” and a lot else, nevertheless, it is hard for a simpleton flerfer like me to cogitate all the contradictions that abound, would you not agree? There is such a thing as a false premise, no?
Read the first comment on this article!

Pat
Pat
Reply to  bangbangsilverhammer
1 month ago

People go blind for lots of reasons. In the case of the shot, most likely a blood clot blocked blood to the eye, killing the tissue and causing blindness. Don’t be gullible!

Pat
Pat
1 month ago

You recently ran an article showing that Dr. David Cole had demonstrated that there are NO MICROCIRCUITS in the death shots. WHY ARE YOU GIVING THIS IDIOT PUBLICITY? We already KNOW or SHOULD KNOW that there are NO MICROCIRCUITS in the shots. We don’t even have the technology to do that! Nobody does. People HOPE to have it someday, but we don’t have it NOW. Furthermore, the formation of microcircuits requires immersion in fluids which are toxic to the human body. They could NEVER form in human tissue or blood. I went round and round with the commenters on this issue recently. I think you have some level of responsibility for not giving publicity to people who don’t know what they are talking about, especially without presenting evidence from people who know better. ***SIGH!***

Even if we assume for the sake of argument that these squares are manufactured, they’re STILL NOT MICROCIRCUITS. And by the way, this doctor doesn’t have the credentials to make such a claim. Dr. Cole DOES.

There are plenty of harmful things in the shots, but making this claim makes us who oppose these shots and mandates look like idiots. It discredits us. It is almost certainly a false flag CALCULATED to discredit us. Please don’t print lies. You have freedom of the press. Use it responsibly!

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Dr. Ryan Cole. Sorry.

TheRoyaleMan
TheRoyaleMan
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

He didn’t “demonstrate” anything. He just simply gave his conclusions

TheRoyaleMan
TheRoyaleMan
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

“I think you have some level of responsibility for not giving publicity to people who don’t know what they are talking about, especially without presenting evidence from people who know better.”

Response: You have no proof that they don’t know what they’re talking about. And they did present Cole’s side too (if that is who you mean by “people who know better”).

“And by the way, this doctor doesn’t have the credentials to make such a claim. Dr. Cole DOES.”

Response: Cole had his chance to prove his claims and/or respond to the reasoning those guys gave for this stuff being circuitry or graphene and say why it’s wrong. He did neither. And doing that is required. The fact that he is a specialist doesn’t make that not required.

“Please don’t print lies. You have freedom of the press. Use it responsibly!”

Response: Prove they’re lies. Until you, Cole, or anyone else can, these journalists are right for covering this. Journalists should cover every possible explanation.

Appeal to authority arguments aren’t evidence or proof.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You can’t prove they aren’t but you used the oldest tech ever, you tried to discredit La Quinta Columna and me, too.
You came up with an unbelievable ‘experience’ (52 years) background of your so called (and based on your numbers).

Could you please invite him for a chat? My senior network engineer husband is ready to help with the details on these circuits on a far more professional way I would be able to do.
LET’S DISCUSS IT SHOWING PROOF, WILL YOU PLEASE?

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You obviously forgot to read the article.
Maybe you should watch the Del Bigtree – Dr. Ryan Cole interview and learn something factual.

Joe
Joe
1 month ago

Joe Biden just issued an EO sending Billions of dollars toward funding this.

Circuitry is in the patents, according to Karen Kingston.

NANO
NANO
1 month ago

Ryan cole is an controlled opposition. Half truths half lies. People think it is funny when you say they are chipped. They believed the lies soooo much that now the lies have become the truth for them. Therefore the real harsh truth is becoming too extreme to believe. MAC address bluetooth signals have been experimented by many researhers around the world and all have found that vaxxed are emitting bluetooth signals. Anyone with any phone with bluetooth scanner can find these signals. Unidentified MAC addresses that have NO MANUFACTURER cannot exist. IEEE won’t allow any manufacturer to produce a device without allocating them a MAC address block. These MAC address signals all have no manufacturer info and it is the same wherever you go in the world. This simple fact alone proves that there is nanotechnology in the injectables.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  NANO
1 month ago

C’mon every mobile device chip has a geolocalisation MAC address.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  VoicefromEurope
1 month ago

Visible only since the start of the vaccination? Because before that we never saw unidentified MACs popping up in a crowd.

Besides these part (could be another source) was tested. People was asked to either switch off their mobiles or leave it behind. I could ‘see’ my neighbors’ MACs through the wall but we don’t have any no matter our phones are in front of us or were put away in a Faraday cage.

Plus, geolocalisation or not, with a switched off bluetooth we can’t see each other devices.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Actually we did. And if you don’t believe me, ask any electronic repair shop worke in your neighbourhood..

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – There’s microcircuitry inside the Covid injections, says Australian doctor […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] […]

Country52liver
Country52liver
1 month ago

I appreciate anyone who digs into the secretive content of the “covid vaccines”. The theory of microcircuitry may eventually be provide correct or incorrect however we need more people reporting on their investigations into the Covid Vaccine since the Drug companies are not offering any plausible explanations to the observed side effects to the jab. The truth will come out eventually. Remember, a conspiracy theory is only a theory until it is proven correct.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
1 month ago

7 of 9, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix One.

Si Warne
Si Warne
1 month ago

Just use a LE Bluetooth scanner and you’ll see all those poor jabbed show up. These are nano transceivers.

Emily
Emily
1 month ago

Skip the B/S music at the beginning please

trackback
1 month ago

[…] There’s microcircuitry inside the Covid injections, says Australian doctor […]