Breaking News

BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The UK Statistics Regulator has confirmed, in writing, that data published by the Office for National Statistics (“ONS”) cannot be used in support of the “safe and effective” narrative.

Many researchers and news organisations have made claims of vaccine efficacy and safety based on the ONS reports. We therefore now call on all those who have made such claims [especially the BBC] to publicly retract them,” said Professors Norman Fenton and Martin Neil.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


In November four researchers – Professor Norman Fenton, Professor Martin Neil, Dr. Clare Craig and Scott McLachlan – wrote a formal letter of complaint to the Statistics Regulator about the ONS data on vaccine mortality.  Their letter stated:

“All of the anomalies in the dataset introduce bias in favour of analyses supporting vaccine ‘safety and efficacy’.  The fact that these data are being used as continued justification for the efficacy and safety of the covid vaccines is therefore now a matter of national concern and scandal. We believe that an investigation into how and why the ONS dataset is so flawed and corrupted is required.”

Read more: Researchers tell ONS “Your Data on Vaccine Mortality is Flawed” & demand Public Withdrawal of Dataset

Yesterday, the four researchers received a response which admits that the ONS data should not be used to support assertions that covid injections are “safe and effective.”  The response states:

Our overview, is that the Deaths by Vaccination Status publication does not provide information vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety, and should not be used this way.

ONS Deaths by Vaccination statistics, Correspondence from Director General for Regulation, 20 January 2023

Professors Norman Fenton and Martin Neil published their comments on the Regulator’s response on Substack:

While there are aspects of the response that we are unhappy with, the crucial point is that they have completely accepted our main recommendation [that ONS’ Deaths by Vaccination report cannot be used to support vaccine “safety and efficacy.”]

Many researchers and news organisations have made claims of vaccine efficacy and safety based on the ONS reports. We therefore now call on all those who have made such claims to publicly retract them.

It is also important to note that the Regulator agreed with our conclusions that the ONS population sample was biased – with those excluded much more likely to be unvaccinated.

We therefore call on all of those – including especially the BBC – who have used the ludicrously low estimates from the ONS to publicly withdraw all material based on these estimates, as they have been deliberately used to represent the unvaccinated as a tiny fringe minority.

The not-so-good news is that, as expected the Regulator has gone to extreme lengths to defend the integrity of the ONS. In particular, they are putting forward the ‘healthy vaccinee effect’ which we have previously dealt with and which we will be further dismantling in the next few weeks.

Our analysis of the most recent ONS report on deaths by vaccination status is HERE. That report was published in July 2022 with the most recent data up to May 2022. Despite promises to do so, the ONS had not provided any updates to it since.

UK Statistics Regulator agrees with our recommendation to ignore any claims of vaccine safety based on ONS deaths by vaccination status data, Where Are the Numbers, 20 January 2023
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
186no
186no
12 days ago

The BBC will never do this because to do so will “shoot their fox” dead; i.e. the promotion of a bunch of lies that they have decided constitutes “settled science” when the exact opposite is the case as has been shown by independent sources many times over, necessitating retractions and admissions of wrongdoing; this is on top of their demonstrable bias in key areas of so called News reporting. They can only do this – apart from employing people who are wholly bought into the lie in “The Noble liar” as set out by Robin Aitken – because of the licence fee. If a similarly actuated organisation such as Full Fact can publish demonstrably false information in traducing Andrew Bridgen – e.g as HART have pointed out with own “fact check” that the FF statement as stated on their website that the so called vaccine ( itself a lie ) is not gene editing is 100% wrong given that the FDA defines mRNA as such, so The BBC can get away with it time and again. Will The BBC Trustees demand an investigation; will the UK Charities regulator answer any demand that FF’s charitable status is a smokescreen for their suppression of free speech and a provable falsehood as demonstrated by HART?

I live in hope……..

boris
boris
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
11 days ago

i just do not understand how the Gov and Media are not able to be Sued for Saying the Lie of Safe And effective the whole time for an untested product just released in 2021 never before used on human beings.. also the lie that Pyfzer and murderna is a vaccine.. where in fact it is gene based therapy product..Lied about this too among other things..oh counting covid deaths and cases with a PCR that can not exactly say you have covid 19!

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  186no
12 days ago

You also have to consider that what the BBC was pushing is exactly what the UK government wanted so this can never happen. One MP speaks out and is instantly cancelled.

More importantly though from the “clinging too the narrative” does prove the UK government intentionally wants the majority of its own population dead or it could come clean could it not? See how easy it is too fathom the truth.

Look over there another person drops down dead from SADS or suffers death from turbo cancer. They are not really squirrels but may as well be the way the government is ignoring the reality of what it did. /S

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Mark Deacon
12 days ago

You are a man that thinks!

By the way, I have read many of your comments and have noted that you have a consistent habit of writing/typing “too” instead of “to” when the grammatical structure doesn’t allow it.

This isn’t a criticism, merely an observation!

Sorry for being so awfully pedantic/punctilious!!!

Nina
Nina
Reply to  186no
12 days ago

Gates bought out the BBC in the early days so won’t get any truth from that quarter.

Ken Hughes
Ken Hughes
12 days ago

Is this a double edged sword? Does the decision of the regulator, not to allow the use of ONS stat’s to be used for justifying safe and effective claims, mean, that the same ONS data, cannot therefore be used to justify real dangers to the public?

W. A. O'Gorman
W. A. O'Gorman
12 days ago

Someone needs to work out a way for those facilitators that went along for a quiet life to climb out semi-gracefully and to drop the rest of them in it.

PureBlood1778
PureBlood1778
11 days ago

⁣Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. If you want to get Ivermectin you can visit ivmpharmacy.com

trackback
11 days ago

[…] – BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data […]

Wayne
Wayne
11 days ago

The corrupt BBC will never do this.

dja
dja
10 days ago

The BBC will try to ride this all the way through and hope the Great Reset will save them. Too many people have turned though. Just look at Youtube and Twitter now for an indication. Soon they will start to get that the narrative is a lot bigger than the just the vax and then all hell will break loose. I doubt BBC staff will be safe to walk the streets, let alone politicians.

trackback
7 days ago

[…] BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] BBC must publicly retract covid vaccine “safety and efficacy” claims made based on ONS data […]