Breaking News

An explosive new study describing “unintended immune responses” from mRNA injections has dropped a tactical nuke on Pfizer

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Last Wednesday, The Telegraph published an article on a study that showed one in four who had Moderna or Pfizer Covid jabs experienced an unintended immune response.  This “unintended immune response,” The Telegraph reported, was created by a “glitch” in the way the vaccine was read by the body.

The Telegraph went on to say that “mRNA vaccines were affected by the glitch but no adverse effects were created, Cambridge researchers say.”

“If Kevin McKernan’s SV40 monkey-virus discovery tossed a hand-grenade into Pfizer’s machine-gun bunker, this carefully-written study dropped a tactical nuke on Pfizer’s Pacific Fleet anchoring at Hawaii,” Jeff Childers wrote.

Jeff Childers is an American lawyer and author of the blog ‘Coffee & Covid’.  The following is his analysis of the study and The Telegraph’s reporting of it.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Another bomb dropped on the jabs and it could be the fatal blow

By Jeff Childers, Coffee & Covid News 7 December 2023

Pfizer must feel like it’s been one damned thing after another these days. In a year packed with horrible news for the jabs – not to mention poor jab recipients – yesterday saw a critical new discovery of jab problems, possibly the worst and most damning yet. How bad was it? It was so bad that, even though I almost never make predictions any more, I will predict this: The FDA will be forced to withdraw the mRNA covid shots because of this study.

I’m not even joking about that.

Our investigation begins with yesterday’s Telegraph article about a new study headlined: ‘One in four who had Moderna or Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response’.

The explosive, new, peer-reviewed, gold-standard study is already making news even though it was only published yesterday, 6 December. And it published in the well-respected journal Nature, featuring the multisyllabic, incomprehensible title, ‘N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting’.

This study has twenty authors. There is safety in numbers.

Don’t let the mind-numbing title fool you. If Kevin McKernan’s SV40 monkey virus discovery tossed a hand grenade into Pfizer’s machine-gun bunker, this carefully-written study dropped a tactical nuke on Pfizer’s Pacific Fleet anchoring at Hawaii. The study’s implications are vast.

Since the science is a little thick – no, it’s very thick – I’ll start by telling you the end first.

Here’s how The Telegraph’s article defensively described the study’s results. Keep in mind, they were down-playing the results, as much as they possibly could:

Hahaha! The vaccines were “not perfect!!” Oh my gosh! Please, stop! Hahahaha! It hurts to laugh! Whew. Alright, I’m okay now. Onwards.

Here’s the simple version. The researchers discovered that a necessary ingredient in the mRNA vaccines, 1-methylpseudouridine, has an unfortunate side-effect; it messes up RNA translation one-third of the time by slipping a gear every so often. Instead of making the intended spike protein, these tiny mis-translational slip-ups create … other things. Other kinds of proteins. New ones.

And there’s no way at all to predict what kind of protein it will create.  It’s stochastic – completely random.

The “vaccine” creates stochastic proteins one third of the time. In one-third of cells, not people, like The Telegraph again misreported. There are trillions of mRNA packages in each shot. So – unless I’m missing something – what the study is saying, without actually saying it, is that this is happening inside every single jab recipient.

And it’s happening a lot.

Now, you know I hate to sound negative but I’m guessing there would have been a lot more vaccine hesitancy had people known that trillions of their cells would soon randomly be creating bizarre, novel proteins, and for an indeterminate and possibly long time.

That sounds a lot like Russian roulette.

Nobody could possibly know what kinds of problems this kind of thing might cause. Mostly because they’ve never tested anything like this before, except maybe down in the lowest level of the secret dungeons under Dr. Mengele’s laboratory.

Do not let them get away with it when the citizen volunteers will inevitably argue: “Hey, they were new vaccines, of course, we’re going to learn some unexpected things about them. Nobody expected them to be perfect.”

Um, NO. They called it “misinformation” when we said the shots were “experimental.” They said the shots were the best-tested, safest vaccines in human history. They said we learned all the long-term side effects within the first 90 days – and guess what? There were none.  No long-term side effects.

Honestly, sometimes it’s infuriating how stupid our experts are.

Continuing on, The Telegraph first claimed “no adverse effects” were caused by the “nonsense proteins,” but then turned right around and said they cause an unintended immune system flare-up. That is an adverse effect, morons. But second, they are just slapping the old “no evidence” gag around. In this case, The Telegraph’s “no evidence” argument is an archaic, tired-out, well-known logical fallacy called the “Argument from Ignorance.”

All they are really saying is, we don’t know what the adverse effects might be.

I don’t want to quibble, but saying, “There ARE NO adverse effects” is a rather different thing from saying, “We DON’T KNOW what kind of adverse effects this might cause.”

For an idea of just how mendacious The Telegraph’s article was, here is the precise sentence from the study that The Telegraph used when it falsely reported that “no adverse effects were created by the error, data show”:

See? There was not any “data” proving that the vaccines were safe, as The Telegraph claimed. The study only said there was “no evidence of an association with adverse events.” Which certainly could be just because nobody’s looked for an association with adverse events yet.

The study, which is so technical it can be barely understood by lay readers, if at all, was marvellously written. At first, a reader mistakenly concludes the study is a giant apologia for the jabs. Every chance they got, the twenty authors optimistically described the bright future of mRNA technology – once, that is, this one teensy, awkward little (unfixable) wrinkle has been ironed out of the formula. That’s how the study passed peer review and got published.

The scientists are learning how to play the game.

Now, remember. This study – and all the news reports about it – constantly reassures pharma bigwigs and depressed jab-takers that there’s no evidence of adverse effects from the random “nonsense proteins,” the randomised proteins that 25% of their transfected cells are now making. Nothing to worry about!

But check out this very telling quote from one of the study authors, Anne Willis, who is a very upbeat kind of lady. She found that the problem just creates a very exciting opportunity for jab makers to fix it:

Screech! Hold on, wait just a minute! Slam on the brakes for a second. If fixing the issue “massively de-risks the [mRNA] platform” … that means … there are massive risks to be fixed. And that quote, ladies and gentlemen, gave away the entire game, right there, and showed us what the study authors are really thinking.

They are appalled, just like we are. And they got the message out the only way they could, smuggled across the peer-reviewed border in a hollowed-out teddy bear of exciting opportunities.

The offending ingredient, 1-methylpseudouridine, is a type of pseudouridine used in the jabs to stabilise the mRNA payload. We’ve discussed this chemical before. Its first unintended side-effect was making the mRNA too stable, which we think is why the pseudouridine-enhanced mRNA lasts for months, or longer, instead of disappearing within a few hours, as natural mRNA does, and like the FDA mendaciously claimed it would when they were first pushing the jabs.

Ironically, they just gave the Nobel prize to the two scientists who figured out how to make artificially long-lasting mRNA using 1-methylpseudouridine. But yesterday’s peer-reviewed study – written long before the Nobel prize was awarded – concluded there is a fatal flaw with using 1-methylpseudouridine. The authors’ suggestion to fix it? Use natural mRNA.

But since natural mRNA won’t work, as it is metabolised too quickly, the real message from the study is: mRNA technology is inherently unsafe and poses massive unknown risks. Who knows what are the risks of millions or trillions of cells creating random proteins all day long? Remember the old “infinite number of monkeys” argument? It goes: Given enough monkeys and typewriters, some chimp somewhere will randomly type up Hamlet before you even get around to handing out bananas for lunch.

Who wants to roll the dice that trillions of “random proteins” never ever come up with something harmful? Or is it even more likely the whole unexpected process is all harmful? Random results in a drug should be unacceptable, even if they only create conditions for autoimmunity.

Thus, the FDA [and national regulatory bodies for all countries] must pull these drugs.

Let’s recap the four major jab low-lights – all from just this year:

  1. In February, Kevin McKernan brilliantly discovered unexpected DNA plasmid contamination in the mRNA shots.
  2. Kevin equally brilliantly discovered something hiding in plain sight that apparently every other scientist on the planet – including the FDA – somehow missed: The mRNA shots unexpectedly include parts of an oncogenic simian virus (associated with cancer).
  3. In August, I reported on a study showing the way spike protein, and thus the shots, cause autoimmune problems by unexpectedly binding to C4 immune cells, in my post titled, JACKPOT Tuesday, 8 August 2023, C&C NEWS.
  4. Then yesterday, in this newest study, we learned about the fourth major, unexpected problem with the jabs, which goes to their very design – random protein production.

So, you tell me: How long can the FDA [and other regulatory bodies] realistically keep this charade going? There will be more explosions at the next meeting of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee than there were at Pearl Harbor.

We are now sprinting towards the finish line.

Featured image: Both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna covid injections use mRNA technology

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Petra
Petra
5 months ago

How much more can the authorities brush under the carpet?

I think the end is near.

christine.257
christine.257
Reply to  Petra
5 months ago

The end is near for the vaccinated, more like – King Charles III’s Great Reset 2025?

Mike Gould
Mike Gould
Reply to  Petra
5 months ago

UNTIL NUREMBERG 2.0

john
john
Reply to  Petra
5 months ago

Written in 1889!!!
“VACCINATION Proved Useless & Dangerous” (ALFRED R. WALLACE)
“The question is one
which affects our personal liberty as well as
the health and even the lives of thousands;
it therefore becomes a duty to endeavour to
make the truth known to all, and especially to
those who, on the faith of false or misleading
statements, have enforced the practice of
vaccination by penal laws.”
This war has raged for 150 years……… except now “the lives of thousands” is billions.

Diane
Diane
5 months ago

The injection is poison and anyone with a thinking brains knows it. Then again, a few years ago it was discovered it could change DNA within 6 hours, and eyebrows were barely raised. The cabal have MSM paid off. Word is getting out though, and not just about the poison shots. We hope the tipping point is approaching.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  Diane
5 months ago

Now I dont condone violence, not at all, but I sometimes wonder, how much of a kick in the teeth need we collectively recieve before we begin to bite back?

PWS
PWS
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
5 months ago

I live in Melbourne Australia and vicpole’s 1st interaction is violence…at some point in time we will have to stand together.

abc
abc
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
5 months ago

I was like you. These days, I’m fine with some violence. There’s been enough of it against innocent people. We know who the guilty are. Violence in their direction is overdue.

Chris C
Chris C
Reply to  Diane
5 months ago

Maybe only 3.5% is needed for a tipping point?
We are close anyway, and must not take our foot off the gas just because there is a lull: this is the time to put more and more pressure on the guilty.

As Dr Mike Yeadon eloquently points out, our bodies attack anything that is “non self”, so they craftily use graphene nanotubes to deliver the payloads to our DNA, making it build alien proteins.
His video address to the UK Parliament last Monday was not received because of “technical difficulties” (again) or maybe it was too much truth for them to swallow.
Would the MP’s be bothered if they were exempt from the C19 Needles of Death, as if they were incapable of spreading the yet-to-be-observed virus?
Then there is the issue of the self-assembling nanotech in the devil juice jabs, so we need more clarity on these two layers of toxicity from microscopists.

Lou Schwartzenberg
Lou Schwartzenberg
Reply to  Diane
5 months ago

Change the term “thinking brain”, to “functioning cause, and effect genes”, and you’ve nailed it! As previously stated- holocaust 2 is upon us!

john
john
5 months ago

I can imagine that the insurance business is on its last legs. When living flesh is insured by “monarchs” and Popes, it becomes a very profitable business if murder becomes the method to cash in those matured policies.
Prince Philip pocketed $950 trillion in 2017 from such a scam. Charles Windsor isn’t far behind him from the jab fatalities.

Bonami1776
Bonami1776
Reply to  john
5 months ago

Really? Do you have a link on this? Sincere question.

john
john
Reply to  Bonami1776
5 months ago
christine.257
christine.257
5 months ago

When is mRNA not mRNA?: mRNA = modRNA = fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA
massive unintended consequences in the 3300 billion lines of genetic code that make up humanity.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Utilizes Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA (modRNA) Technology not mRNA, Pfizer Documents Reveal
by Jim H?ft Aug. 20, 2023 8:20 pm258 Comments
Vials of the COVID-19 vaccine are seen at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Dec. 14, 2020.
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/massive-unintended-consequences-in

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
5 months ago

Pfizer and Moderna, Gates and Fauci, in hopefully saner to come times will be names which ring a similar bell to the Mafia crime families of America.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] An explosive new study describing “unintended immune responses” from mRNA injections has dropped… […]

Dennis K McGee
Dennis K McGee
5 months ago

Everything in these shots is there by design.
There are no “side effects”. These are the precise intended consequences of this syn/bio weapon platform.

Bonami1776
Bonami1776
Reply to  Dennis K McGee
5 months ago

EXACTLY. They have been brewing up this potion for years. Now you know where some of the trillions missing from the Pentagon budget really went.

Ted
Ted
5 months ago

Myxomatosis for humans !.

Doug Lowenstein
Doug Lowenstein
5 months ago

THAT! Is the definition of “gain of function”. Congrats Fauci! You just destroyed the human race as we know it. And every single scientist involved in producing the fake vaxx bioweapon is just as culpable as Fauci! Does the word”holocaust” come to mind? Only this holocaust makes the WW2 holocaust seem like a beach party by comparison!

Chris C
Chris C
Reply to  Doug Lowenstein
5 months ago

True, exactly a thousand times as many people have been targetted for death and maiming compared to the 1940’s atrocity.

The Holocaust killed MILLIONS but the C19 “vaccines” will kill BILLIONS.

Harvey Weinstein
Harvey Weinstein
5 months ago

The NEW Pfizer/Moderna/Fauci holocaust is continuing every day!

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  Harvey Weinstein
5 months ago

With open gain it is the holocaust that can no longer be stopped.

There is no off switch.

Bonami1776
Bonami1776
Reply to  Mark Deacon
5 months ago

I wonder, the first rule of bioweapons research is you make a cure at the same time as the weapon.

And not taking the vax does not equate as a cure. They are clever and yes, I believe they made a cure. The issue is how does the world get its hands on it.

Alternatively I am sure a great many minds are working on this issue. None in our govt apparently..

Joel
Joel
5 months ago

Applying mRNA therapy (as part of “molecular biology”) to the human body looks as promising and usefull as applying astrophysics to the universe. For sure the universe won’t mind…. Now we all wait for the moment people are also no longer bothered by it. But if these nerds don’t come to their senses by themselves they’d better be restrained.

John Blundell
John Blundell
5 months ago

Potential for both predictable and unpredictable negative consequences

Technology of mRNA Vaccines with Two major obstacles for mRNA are;
its transient nature due to its susceptibility to breakdown by RNAses,
its known power to invoke a strong immune response, which interferes with its transcription into protein.
The immune response results not only in an inflammatory response but also the rapid clearance of the RNA and suppression of transcription.
By substituting N1-methylpseudouridine for all the uridine nucleotides that stabilized RNA against degradation, allowing it to survive long enough to produce adequate amounts of protein antigen needed for immunogenesis immune response.
However Uracil should have allowed RNA to break down and dissipate, but artificial methylpseudouridine remains forever, and so too reproduction of the Spike protein to cause the multiple adverse reactions; myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, cancers, and infertility. A mass extinction event?
Not least the use of artificial methylpseudouridine can cause inaccurate RNA translation to then cause Cancers undetectable by our immune system. This does not occur in nature as a pandoras box scenario.
 The Covid-19 Spike proteins should have broken down in weeks but is lasting years, also with the Vaccinated.
Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.25.449905v3
https://www.nutritruth.org/single-post/toxic-spike-proteins-in-blood-regrets-of-the-vaxxed https://peterlegyel.wordpress.com/2021/12/20/unintended-consequences-of-mrna-shots/

Bonami1776
Bonami1776
5 months ago

Hangings, I want hangings.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Bonami1776
5 months ago

Hi Bomami1776,
Without a doubt you are correct.
A journey begins with the first step.
In the UK we have Andrew Bridgen, leading the charge.
The start is slow, but will build up.
We need the Epstein Island list, then we can hang some MP’s.
That list is very important, they are involved with the C19 fluid manufacture.

john
john
Reply to  Dave Owen
5 months ago

The “UK CORPORATION” can keep its Andrew Bridgen.
England is forming and will have its Lawful Government by the people for the people.
https://theenglishcountiesassembly.co.uk/

Kay
Kay
5 months ago

I love this writer. He’s hilarious. Have to start reading more of him. There are so many great people writing and reporting on this and other hideous messes that I can’t keep up.

IRISH
IRISH
5 months ago

not a single vaccine confers immunity to anything. ALL vaccines intend harm by compromising the in born immune system.

Kilauea
Kilauea
5 months ago

It makes sense when you accept the fact that their are powerful people pushing population reduction.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] – An explosive new study describing “unintended immune responses” from mRNA injections has dropped… […]

Wayne Lusvardi
Wayne Lusvardi
5 months ago

This study is bunk just as much as what the drug companies say is bunk.
Learn a little bit about Innate Immune System. It blasts anything foreign into infinitesimal small pieces that spread throughout the body. The drug companies know this, so that was what they intended: to scatter RNA fragments over the whole body, even the brain. A Japan/Pfizer study found the vax gets stuck in the protoplasm and never gets into nucleus of cells. Stefano Scoglio, PhD, Nobel Prize nominee, says the RNA wrapped in lipid fat is a “toxic bomb”. There is no Graphene Oxide in the shots because Graphene is merely a marketing concept for Graphite which is benign. As for SV 40 Promoter, it wouldn’t last past the Innate Immune System blowing it to smithereens. Both the vaxxers and anti-vaxxers use fear to scare the public. And it is easy to fall for the Controlled Opposition because they say what we want to hear: that the vax is bad. But it is bad for different reasons than they say. So a treatment protocol for, say, Graphene Oxide or 5-G or Plasmids would be useless.

pxxat5
pxxat5
5 months ago

I don’t know who, what, where or how, and for what conceivable reason they created this drug, it has more tentacles then an octopus, for unintended causations. Which will be spawning a whole new branch of disease medicine, unrelated to normal pathogenic infective modalities, but which will be dedicated to renormalizing our human metabolic processes, so corrupted by this ticking time bomb, of a so called…”DRUG”.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
4 months ago

Arrest Walensky, Birx, Fauci, Daszak and all DOD, CIA, CDC, NIH, WHO, FDA and big pharma and big tech. executives involved.

Fraud and homicide are not included in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals!

RICO laws apply now! The DOJ better wake the Fk Up and get busy!

trackback
4 months ago

[…] An explosive new study describing “unintended immune responses” from mRNA injections has dropped… […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] mainstream media outlet the Telegraph has confirmed in a report that one in four people experienced an “unintended immune response” from receiving the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] mainstream media outlet the Telegraph has confirmed in a report that one in four people experienced an “unintended immune response” from receiving the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus […]