Breaking News

Unless Says So Then It’s Not True, The UK Government Advises

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Things aren’t always what they seem online so take care with what you share a UK government campaign titled ‘SHAREChecklist’ boldly states. Their advice? Check the facts with an official source such as GOV.UK or Full Fact.

Our advice is to share it.  If you are unsure of the source or where facts are limited or uncertain, state as such and enquire whether further information is available. Stay curious, analyse, ask questions, challenge, and open dialogues and discussions.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Most of us are aware that it’s not only online but also things published by corporate media that aren’t always what they seem.  However, a major difference between government or corporate media reports and independent or citizen reports shared online, is the latter allows for public discourse and open debate, providing they are not censored, while corporate media and their fact-checking services do not – they prefer a top-down “above all” approach.

Denying public debate negates the all-important diversity of thought in a liberal and democratic society. Silencing counterarguments that challenge their preferred storyline enables governments and corporate media to create a one-sided narrative.  A narrative that, left unchallenged, moves further and further away from the truth.  But here’s a fact that you will not find on either GOV.UK or Full Fact: a lie cannot become truth, no matter how often it is repeated.

The SHAREChecklist attempts to provide advice on what to share and what not to share apparently for the good of others.  Information that does not originate from their sources could be “harmful to share with our friends and families,” the UK government claims.

It’s important to understand that we, the people, are in the midst of an information war.  One which began in earnest at the start of 2020.  A battle in the public space for complete and truthful information while governments and their advisors attempt to manipulate our perceptions and behaviours so we obey their instructions, without question, even when those instructions prove to be harmful. 

Even the most trusting know that governments and politicians hide the truth, manipulate the truth and even outright lie – it’s merely the extent that varies.  We know that governments use mass media – television, radio and online – as tools to roll out their narratives to the public en masse.  Additional government tools include initiatives such as their SHAREChecklist campaign.

(Related: Are Governments across the “Five Eyes” using Hypnosis against Citizens?)

At the very least corporate media is biased but as they sink deeper into an ever-narrowing storyline it is becoming apparent that reports are being manufactured and that they are activists seeking to implement an agenda, they are not journalists.

(Related:  Journalists Are Educated to Lie, Betray and Never Tell the Truth)

Fact-checking services do not provide facts they provide opinions. Last year, Facebook admitted in court that its “fact checks” are nothing more than statements of opinion. Not experts’ opinions but those of the “fact-checkers.”  And self-described “fact-checkers” are not independent. They are dependent on donations from large corporations, the same corporations that work to craft a narrative and silence public debate through censorship.

(Related: We are grooming the science to fit the narrative. Freedom of speech has been gagged)

The SHAREChecklist

As we work through the checklist what will become apparent is that in no way does the government advise, or even so much as hint at encouraging: critical thinking, comparing a variety of sources, open dialogue or debate.  The checklist leads readers along a path to following a narrative set by a centralised coterie – the government or whoever is “advising” them.

The Government’s first bit of advice is to “make sure information comes from a trusted source.”  This is common sense and something we should all be doing, and most likely instinctively are.  What each of us believes are “trusted sources” is decisive. 

A source that has been proven to lie without remorse is not a source to be trusted.  Any source that consistently and persistently promotes Covid injections as “safe and effective” and so roll up your sleeve for another shot, for example, is not to be trusted.  Within these sources, the lies are pathological and systemic. Such a source – the BBC, SAGE or UK government, for example – does not suddenly and inexplicably switch from being wanton liars to being truthful.

(Related: British MP condemns UK Governments Covid-19 Vaccine Disinformation Campaign; “They are in denial about the safety of these jabs” and Is your country being led by a Psychopath?)

The second bit of advice the Government has to offer is to read beyond the headline – yet more common sense.  A headline cannot contain all the substantive information that an article contains.

Additionally, clickbait headlines, for example, are common practice in all forms of media.  To avoid a knee jerk response to the attention-seeking text we should not take an article, or post online, at its headline.  Corporate media, as with marketing agencies, are particularly adept at clickbait headlines, texts and thumbnails.  And, of course, the UK government has SPI-B and the Nudge Unit to advise them on how to use psychology to maximise public “engagement” and “cooperation.”  The checkmark or tick symbol incorporated into the SHAREChecklist logo is an example of typical Nudge Unit behavioural psychology.

(Related: Here Are Some Names and Faces of The UK’s Nudge Unit and A British System of Psychological Manipulation Which Has Been Sold Worldwide)

Again, in its third bit of advice, the Government advises some additional common sense: “check the facts.”  What is notable about this point is that, according to the UK government, there are a limited number of sources that provide these “facts.”  Actually, there are only two: themselves, of course, and “fact-checkers,” namely Full Fact.

(Related: 100K Covid Deaths? Our response to and Full Fact say the Covid Vaccines are NOT experimental – they’re lying)

The BBC frequently and repeatedly tells its viewers that it is a trusted source, bringing you the all facts. Yet, SHAREChecklist does not recommend them as a source to “check the facts.” This may or may not be an indication of how the Government views BBC’s “fact-based” reporting or, possibly, recognition the public has, by and large, lost its trust in the BBC.

(Related: The Trusted News Initiative – A BBC led organisation censoring Public Health experts who oppose the official narrative on Covid-19)

Taking on board the first two bits of advice – “trusted source” and “read beyond the headline,” in this case the Government’s headline – we take a brief look at the Government recommended “fact-checker” Full Fact later in this article.

The fourth bit of the Government’s advice is as true for images and videos shared online as it is for images and videos shown on television.  There have been many examples of dubious images and videos published by corporate media over the past two years that deserve to be questioned.  There is no source of information, “official” or unofficial, that we should not test for accuracy and reliability. Stay sceptical.  Criticism is not only legitimate, it is necessary.

(Related: Former British Spy Involved in Chemical Weapons Deceptions During Syrian Conflict Resurfaces to Broadcast Chemical Weapons May Be Used in Ukraine)

The final bit of advice the Government gives is that typos could be an indication that the information is false.  How are those with dyslexia or learning difficulties supposed to feel reading that?  For those who find it hard to express their thoughts and ideas in writing, you’re in good company.  While Albert Einstein loved mathematics and science, he disliked grammar and had problems with spelling.

After singling out typos, then comes the sneaky bit: “official guidance” – in other words, the Government’s or the centralised coterie’s guidance – has been “carefully checked” presumably for spelling and grammatical errors.  So naturally, the Government’s typo-free publications must be true – of course!  On that basis, if you want to avoid being censored download Grammarly now!

Who Is Full Fact?

Full Fact’s website states: “We’re developing world-leading technology and new research to spot repeated claims, and find out how bad information can be tackled at a global scale.  And we campaign for change that will make bad information rarer and less harmful.”

Who are the people and organisations behind Full Fact? Who are they campaigning for?  Who is determining what information is “bad”?

In 2012, UK Column published an article about Full Fact, ‘Faux Facts – The disturbing Truth About’, digging a little deeper into “this interesting little non-profit company, headed by Tory Party donor and Anne Freud Centre Chairman Michael Samuel.”

In 2019 Daily Mail wrote that Full Fact was at the centre of an election row with the Tories and was forced to defend its credibility after it stepped into a social media war after an election debate between Jeremy Corbyn and Boris Johnson. Daily Mail quoted Dominic Raab: “Who said Final Fact is the final arbiter of what the public gets to see as the truth? There’s no god-given right, set in law.”

“Foundations set up by eBay creator Pierre Omidyar and left-wing investor George Soros have also joined tech giants in giving six-figure sums to London-based Full Fact along with thousands of unnamed individual donors paying between £25 and £5,000 each,” Daily Mail reported.

A 2021 article published in The Critic noted the board of trustees included Labour peer Baroness Janet Royall, Lib-Dem peer Lord John Sharkey and former Conservative Party member Lord Richard Inglewood. These three peers are still trustees and Michael Samuel is still chairman.

The Critic article goes on to note that Full Fact is a charity with a small output of research compared to its size, funded primarily by big-tech and staffed to a large extent by former public sector workers or ex-reporters from left-wing media. “Full Fact’s website reports that they were paid £1.1 million by Facebook and £206,500 by Google in 2019, plus a monthly payment of £7,300 worth of free advertising by the search giant. The funding by big-tech in 2019 makes up roughly 70% of their declared funding for the year,” The Critic wrote.

As you can see for yourself in the table below Full Fact is still predominantly funded, and so their opinions are influenced, by the notorious online censor organisations – Facebook, which includes WhatsApp, and Google, which includes YouTube.  In 2021, almost 40% of Full Fact’s “donations” came from Facebook and Google.

Full Fact does not pass the government’s SHAREChecklist test and, according to UK government advice, their articles may be “harmful” if shared with friends and families – do not share them.

Full Fact Funding 2021 retrieved 6 April 2022  
Facebook£305,119.64Third Party Fact Checking programme
Facebook£116,352.14Framework for collaboration during misinformation crises
Facebook£59,634.83Health fellowship
Hundreds of individual donors and gift aid£370,148.00Core funding
Mohn Westlake Foundation£250,000.00Core funding
Google AI for Good Impact Challenge£235,222.77Automated fact checking
Nuffield Foundation£100,000.00Fact checking and annual report
Luminate£75,789.87Core funding
Esmée Fairbairn Foundation£68,333.33Core funding
WhatsApp£61,809.84WhatsApp fact checking service
International Fact Checking Network & WhatsApp£53,737.20Vaccine Grant Program
Baillie Gifford£50,000.00Core funding
John Ellerman Foundation£50,000.00Core funding
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust£50,000.00Core funding
The Buchanan Programme£49,801.68Core funding
The Dulverton Trust£35,000.00Core funding
Gill Family Foundation£30,000.00Core funding
James Padolsey£30,000.00Core funding
International Fact Checking Network & National Endowment for Democracy£26,576.58Fact-Checkers Working Together Research Program
Colefax Charitable Trust£25,000.00Core funding
The M J Samuel Charitable Trust£17,500.00Core funding
International Fact Checking Network & YouTube£17,064.56Fact Checking Development Grant
Highway One Trust£10,000.00Policy team
William de Winton£10,000.00Core funding
Reed Foundation£9,000.00Core funding
Good Thinking Society£8,000.00Core funding
Dorothy Bishop£6,000.00Core funding
Cecil Pilkington Charitable Trust£5,000.00Core funding
Tinsley Charitable Trust£5,000.00Core funding
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 year ago

We know we can trust the government and what they say is the truth, they just “forgot” to tell us about this one: The Hydrogel patent US8415325B2 is listed in the Moderna patent, here. Hydrogels are also mentioned in a second Moderna patent, here. Hydrogel is listed in the Johnson & Johnson patent, here. Hydrogels are made from Graphene Oxide. Nobody can deny the evidence that Graphene Oxide is in the shots.
All the Covid-19 “vaccine” patents mention gene deletion. All the patents except one, mention “complimentary DNA” (cDNA). cDNA is a chimeric mRNA cocktail that’s being coded into Human cells using artificial genetic sequences in cross-species genomics.
According to the US Supreme Court ruling in 2013, altering Humans with cDNA makes them patent eligible. The court documents show that cDNA is made using modified bacterium and Supreme Court judges ruled it patent eligible. This means that a plant, animal or Human, could be patented and owned if first genetically modified with cDNA.
Mark Steele summarized it perfectly by stating:
In the US, the Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are products, patented goods, according to US law, no longer human. Through a modified DNA or RNA vaccination, the mRNA vaccination, the person ceases to be human and becomes the OWNER of the holder of the modified GEN vaccination patent, because they have their own genome and are no longer “human” (without natural people), but “trans-human”, so a category that does not exist in Human Rights. The quality of a natural person and all related rights are lost. This applies worldwide and patents are subject to US law.
Since 2013, all people vaccinated with GM-modified mRNAs are legally trans-human and legally identified as trans-human and do not enjoy any human or other rights of a state, and this applies worldwide, because GEN-POINT technology patents are under US jurisdiction and law, where they were registered.”

See link here:

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 year ago

Proof of the pudding is in the eating: Covid Vaccines are Gene Therapy after giving away millions of Taxpayers Money to expand production of Covid Jabs in the UK
By The Exposé on April 1, 2022
The UK Government has awarded a grant of nearly £16 million of hardworking tax payers money to a Chemical producing giant, under the premise that they will significantly increase production capacity of lipids which are an essential component in Covid-19 vaccines. But in doing so, the Government has been forced to admit that the Covid-19 injections are in fact gene therapy.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 year ago

And this one, well they had our best interests at heart: Countries that buy Pfizer’s vaccine undertake to break the law
Leaked information from confidential agreements that vaccine manufacturer Pfizer concluded with a large number of buyer countries, revealed slave contracts that violate legislation in each and every country. Buyers undertake to break all laws that stand in the way of mass vaccination. The buyers also undertake to bear all costs and all responsibility for the experimental jabs and waive the right to breach the agreement.
Published: August 8, 2021, 12:09 pm
In history’s largest medical experiment with “vaccines” that have not been approved for use in humans, it is the buyers’ responsibility to defend Pfizer for causing harm, leaked documents showed. Pfizer has escaped all liability and is indemnified, arguing that side effects and the long-term effects of the injections are unknown – to the company as well. Pfizer thus admits that an insufficiently tested product is being pushed in literally billions of doses on the world market.
This means that all responsibility for costs, healthcare, etc. due to vaccine damage – no matter how large and onerous – is passed on to the taxpayers in the countries that have signed the agreements. Since the agreements put each country’s own laws out of play, they have all been signed at government level. The design of the agreements is an important explanation for why the propaganda for mass vaccination is of a totalitarian nature and does not allow for debate or questioning.
In view of the fact that the majority of those now in hospital for Covid-19 are fully vaccinated – a situation that buyers could never have anticipated – the agreements certainly appear to be criminal. The buyer countries have been forced to sign the blank agreements, without knowing what they were actually buying.
On July 28 , NBC Chicago reported that 169 people in Illinois died and 644 were hospitalized for Covid-19. Everyone was fully vaccinated. Israel with 9,3 million inhabitants was among the first to sign an agreement with Pfizer. The vaccination rate in the country is 55 percent, and 11 051 469 vaccine doses have been distributed. On June 30, the alarming news broke that fully vaccinated patients accounted for half of Covid adults hospitalized in Israel. In just over a month, the numbers have increased dramatically.
Albania’s agreement with Pfizer
Even from Iceland, which has a vaccination rate of as much as 71,1 percent, there are worrying reports that the majority of hospitalized Covid-19s have been fully vaccinated. Vaccines that have been presented as “safe” and painted as the only salvation in the pandemic, have turned out to be the opposite. Pfizer had good reason to force binding agreements with buyer countries before the truth about the “vaccines” started emerging. One of the top managers in the WHO, Mariangela Simao, admit that people can not feel safe just because they have taken the jab. Vaccines are not enough to prevent the spread of infection.
Israeli Ehden Biber, a cyber security expert, has revealed Pfizer’s agreement with the buyer countries.
It is Israeli cyber security expert, Ehden Biber, who lives in England, that is responsible for the sensational leak regarding the agreements of Pfizer and its customers. Unsurprisingly, the explosive information he recently shared on Twitter on this issue was immediately deleted.
The basis of Biber’s revelation is Albania’s agreement with Pfizer, which was published in the newspaper in January. Curiously, not a single journalist investigated the leak or found it interesting enough to report on.
“They should be ashamed,” said Ehden Biber, who has also leaked Pfizer’s agreements with the EU, Israel, Brazil (signed by Roberto Ferreira Dias, head of the logistics department) and the Dominican Republic. The agreements are designed in the same way, only with different pricing based on what countries could endure. Albania pays $12 per dose, the United States $19,5 per dose and Israel $62 per dose.
“Netanyahu [Israel’s former prime minister] is certainly a magician – he made Israel pay $62 per vaccine dose – five times more than Albania – and got people to worship him for the lousy deal,” noted Biber.
A group of independent investigative journalists in South America has revealed that Pfizer in negotiations with Brazil and Argentina, among others, demanded that the country provide state assets such as embassy buildings and military bases as a guarantee for future costs for possible lawsuits.
The negotiations have been marked by conflicts and delays, and government officials have stated that they were being held hostage by “life-saving vaccines”. After protracted and divisive controversies, Argentina did not sign an agreement until 27 July with Pfizer for about 20 million vaccine doses.
Pfizer has negotiated with more than a hundred countries and signed agreements with a dozen countries in Latin America that have been forced to agree to the company’s outrageous demands. The industry’s greed and abuse are all the clearer in light of the fact that Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers had received generous grants of hundreds of millions of dollars from several governments throughout the vaccine development process. The German government, for example, gave Pfizer’s business partner BioNTech $445 million.
Sweden has recently obediently agreed to increased prices per vaccine dose in the EU’s latest agreement with Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna. For Pfizer/BioNTech, this is an increase from around SEK 160 to SEK 200 per dose. For Moderna from 190 to about 220 kronor, according to the Financial Times.
The reason for the price increase is that the vaccine has been “updated”. Sweden’s “vaccine coordinator”, pharmacist Richard Bergström (with a long history in the pharmaceutical industry) welcomed the price hike. “It’s well worth the money. I call it an ‘all inclusive’ award.”
There is no way out or any way for the buyers to break the agreement if it turns out that the “vaccine” is harmful and large parts of the population suffer from death or other serious side effects. The buyer must complete the agreement and pay the full amount anyway.
Some samples from the confidential agreements
·   The purchaser is aware that the efficacy and long-term effects of the vaccine are unknown and that side effects may occur which are not currently known.
·   The buyer must pay Pfizer for the ordered doses, regardless of how many you use and regardless of whether Pfizer has the preparation approved by the authorities. ” (This was written before the FDA’s emergency approval of the so-called “vaccines”).
·   The buyer hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Pfizer/BioNTech and their subsidiaries indemnified against all claims, documents, claims, losses, damages, debts, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses.
·   The buyer must pay all losses, including and without limitation costs for legal fees and other legal costs.
·   Buyer must indemnify Pfizer for claims and all losses and must implement this through statutory or regulatory requirements.
·   Pfizer has the right to make necessary adjustments to the agreed number of contracted doses and delivery schedule, based on principles decided by Pfizer. The buyer is obliged to agree to any change.
·   The agreement must be kept secret for ten years.
·   However, for the state of Israel’s agreement with Pfizer, signed by the Israeli Ministry of Health on January 6, a full 30 years of secrecy apply. The reason is unclear.
The Covid vaccines were emergency approved (EUA) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on December 1, 2020 – in violation of the agency’s own rules. Emergency approval can only be granted if there is no other, effective treatment. Such treatments exist – but were eliminated by medical authorities around the world. The reason was simple: if effective drug treatments were available, the FDA’s emergency approval would be invalidated and the “vaccines” would be illegal.
Both Plaquenil (Hydroxychloroquine) and the 2015 Nobel Prize-winning drug Scatol (Ivermectin) have been shown to be effective and safe. they areb also cheap, because the patents have expired. Ivermectin has been used for 35 years and 4 billion doses have been distributed. But on March 31, the corrupt WHO banned Ivermectin from treating Covid-19 with the argument “insufficient safety”, despite studies showing that Ivermectin, if used at an early stage of the disease, reduced mortality by 74 percent and has 85 percent efficiency if used as prophylaxis.
International health authorities, including the Swedish Medicines Agency, have slavishly complied with the WHO’s injunctions.
Pfizer demanded that embassy buildings and military bases be provided as a guarantee for future costs for possible lawsuits
Mainstream media around the world have contributed to denying patients good and tested treatments by not raising any questions or concerns. Ivermectin was called a “veterinary medicine” and “dangerous”. On May 22, the two reputable medical journals The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine published false articles alleging studies of nearly 100 000 Covid-19 patients in 671 hospitals and six continents. The bottom line was that Hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as an effective Covid-19 treatment.
Their scam came down to sheer political and medical terrorism. When the scam was revealed and the authors of the article Surgisphere, an obscure small business in Illinois, could not show the data on which the article was based, both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine were forced on June 4 to retract the article and apologize to readers. But by then the system media’s journalists were no longer interested, so the public was never informed about the scam. The publication error nevertheless had serious consequences. The Swedish Medicines Agency banned Plaquenil (Hydroxychloroquine) for indications other than rheumatism. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were thus sacrificed to prepare the market for the vaccine manufacturers’ multi-billion profits. And in addition, millions of patients with Covid were sacrificed. They all might have recovered if they had received the proven medicines.
Why does any country sign such a slave contract at all and agree to break its own laws?
One explanation is the worldwide mass psychosis and the panic and pressure that erupted at the same time as the Corona pandemic in early 2020.
“The globalist entity Pfizer hates nation states and does not recognize their laws and acts as a government that governs other governments in the world. If you look at the complete lawlessness and meltdown of the once stable institutions around the world, you can see that Big Pharma (the multinational pharmaceutical industry) is being used as a massive brick wall to break down national laws and national sovereignty in all countries,” said Ehden Biber.
“Anyone who takes part in the agreements realizes that there are good reasons for Pfizer to keep it a secret and why they make an effort to hide the details of the agreements.”
The Trusted News Initiative took a decision on 10 December 2020, which in practice means that the media undertakes not to report objectively on Covid vaccines. Photo: The Trusted News Initiative
The FDA thus gave an emergency approval to the so-called “Covid vaccines” on December 1, 2020. Ten days later, TNI (Trusted News Initiative), an association of several of the world’s leading media houses and major online platforms, decided to “pioneer a global vaccine campaign and combat the spread of ‘harmful misinformation’ about vaccines”. It was announced at the World Press Freedom Conference on December 10, 2020.
Business magazine Biz News, reported on the initiative: “In a surprisingly underreported event, many of the world’s biggest media, agreed to promote the global vaccine rollout and focus on combating the spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.”
Thus the world’s most influential media groups have decided to act as megaphones for the interests of the vaccine industry and state pharmaceutical authorities. The agreement explains something that has long been obvious to many media consumers, namely the media’s startling one-sided propaganda for the vaccines.
TNI members are some of the largest and leading media houses and news agencies in the world, including the news agencies AP and AFP, Reuters, British BBC, CBC Canada, European Broadcast Union, Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google, YouTube, The Hindu , Microsoft, Twitter and the Washington Post.
Privately owned online platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Google, due to their extreme profitability, evidently colluded with the established media in their efforts to restrict freedom of expression – something that millions of users have experienced in recent years. In Sweden, a seemingly lobotomized and paralyzed journalist corps has so far acted as the megaphones of the Public Health Agency and the vaccine industry and only delivered one-sided vaccine propaganda. The same shills are seen over and over on media platforms, voicing no criticism, opposing views or even questions.
And as if that were not bad enough, one and the same person, James Smith, sits on the board of both Reuters news agency and Pfizer: Two incompatible roles.
James / Jim Smith have incompatible roles. He sits on the board of both Pfizer and the news agency Reuters, one of the media houses that have promised to be at the forefront of the ‘vaccine’ scam. Photos: Reuters, Pfizer
He was previously CEO of Reuters and now calls himself Jim Smith. On Pfizer’s board, he was known as James Smith. In an attempt to hide his dual role, he has removed his image from his LinkedIn profile., but it’s the same person. He is also a member of the International Business Council of the globalist body World Economic Forum.
I have the contract as a PDF, but I can’t see anywhere to load it on this site – it makes interesting reading!!

1 year ago

[…] The Exposé is now heavily censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter and PayPal. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…Visit their website. […]

1 year ago

[…] April 7, 2022Unless Says So Then It’s Not True, The UK Government Advises […]

1 year ago

Someone goes to hospital with covid symptoms. PCR test taken by hospital comes positive and patient is taken to covid emergency room. Family are refused to see the patient. Patient is given remdesivir in lethal doses. Patient can’t breathe because of remdesivir and taken to ventilator. Ventilator bursts up patient’s lungs and dies. Recorded as covid death. Hospital earns thounds of dollar from just one death. Do you see the death protocol? Why over and over again hospitals denied to treat patients with Ivermectin? I suggest everyone to stay away from hospitals as much as possible and treat themselves with proven and effective drugs like ivermectin. You can order yours from

Last edited 1 year ago by rachelPB
1 year ago

[…] – Unless Says So Then It’s Not True, The UK Government Advises […]

1 year ago

[…] April 7, 2022Unless Says So Then It’s Not True, The UK Government Advises […]

1 year ago

[…] April 7, 2022Unless Says So Then It’s Not True, The UK Government Advises […]

1 year ago

[…] is Newspeak as is the so-called “fact-check” service it purports to provide.  As we wrote in a previous article, FullFact is essentially a blog site headed by Conservative Party donor Michael Samuel, heavily […]

1 year ago

[…] is Newspeak as is the so-called “fact-check” service it purports to provide.  As we wrote in a previous article, FullFact is essentially a blog site headed by Conservative Party donor Michael Samuel, heavily […]

1 year ago

[…] of psychological “nudge”?  If it is a spelling error, according to the UK government’s ShareChecklist campaign “typos could be an indication that the information is false.”  So please be warned, what […]

1 year ago

[…] sort of psychological “nudge”?  If it is a spelling error, according to the UK government’s ShareChecklist campaign “typos could be an indication that the information is false.”  So please be warned, what you […]

1 year ago

[…] will draw on a wide range of our internationally-accredited fact-checking colleagues, from Full Fact in the UK to BOOM in […]

1 year ago

[…] will draw on a wide range of our internationally-accredited fact-checking colleagues, from Full Fact in the UK to BOOM in […]

1 year ago

[…] will draw on a wide range of our internationally-accredited fact-checking colleagues, from Full Fact in the UK to BOOM in […]

1 year ago

[…] campaña de #ThinkBeforeSharing de la UNESCO contiene todos los elementos que contiene la campaña de #TakeCareWithWhatYouShare del gobierno del Reino Unido, y más. ¿Están trabajando en […]

1 year ago

[…] #ThinkBeforeSharing campaign contains all the elements that the UK government’s #TakeCareWithWhatYouShare campaign contains, and more.  Are they working in […]

11 months ago

[…] Fact fue nombrada como una de las dos fuentes por el gobierno del Reino Unido que estaban «corrigiendo información falsa». La otra […]

3 months ago

[…] on the launch of “BBC Verify.”  We have followed the UK government’s advice as noted by’s ‘SHAREChecklist’ and noticed Turness had made a few errors and omissions. So, we have reproduced her article with […]