Breaking News

Covid Pandemic Truths: The Enormous Effort to Prevent Alternative Views From Being Discussed

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This pandemic, and the draconian response to it, never seem to go away, perhaps by design. However, because so much is at stake, people need to hear all the critical available data.

By Russell L. Blaylock, 8 December 2021

The Pandemic

I have never seen such an enormous effort by government, medical bureaucracies, media, private institutions, and even medical institutions to prevent dissenting views from being openly discussed — even the opinions of highly qualified scientists in every field of medicine from epidemiology, infectious disease, virology, pathology, and protective equipment engineering. This includes removal of dissenting physician’s licenses, loss of hospital privileges and retraction of peer-reviewed, published articles from the medical literature.  Science, as any true scientist should know, can only advance by an open discussion of all points of view — especially dissenting viewpoints. Science advances by challenging hypotheses and prevailing theories. Institutionalised views stifle scientific advancement and will, especially in clinical medicine, ultimately harm people. These rigid viewpoints become ideological in that any dissent from the particulars of the orthodoxy constitutes a cause for a vicious attack and shunning.

At the core of all medical practice is the concept of informed consent. No prescription, procedure, surgery, or vaccine is to be given or performed without advising the patient, as regards the possible risks and benefits. According to the principle of informed consent, a patient – or in this case, the public at large – must be informed of the indications for the treatment, the efficacy of the treatment, possible available alternatives to the proposed treatment, and most importantly, all the potential side effects and complications, whether acute or long term. This is especially so for new and relatively untested procedures. For example, it has been estimated that for a new type of vaccine or especially genetic treatment, a minimum of 10 years of testing is required.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


What Is Informed Consent: The Vaccine, And the Immune System?

The most common cause for medical malpractice lawsuits is a doctor or institution not providing informed consent before initiating treatment. Not only are we now being denied informed consent, but also a war has been launched by powerful people and institutions, even governments, to prevent vital information from being disseminated.

Unfortunately, the major institutions are purposefully hiding essential data and altering the data available within official circles to convince the public that there is only one solution to this so-called pandemic: Vaccination with virtually untested biological agents.

The blackout of essential information has become so intense that highly respected virologists, infectious disease specialists, and even the person who developed the technology of messenger RNA (mRNA) “vaccines,” have been banned from social media, the news media, and other sources of contact with the public at large.

The effort by vaccine promoters has become so intense that reputations are being ruined, careers destroyed, and even death threats received – as happened to the former head of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield.

No dissenting voice is allowed, no matter how well-qualified, and supported by hard scientific data. One thing that keeps the public in the dark is that most people have virtually no understanding of the complex subjects of immunology, virology, epidemiology, or infectious disease pathology. To people untrained in these areas, it all seems quite simple: There’s a disease outbreak, you make a vaccine against the disease, people become immune, and all is well.

Unfortunately, because of the incredible complexity of the immune system, it does not always work like that. In fact, we are now learning that vaccines, under certain conditions, can make things much worse for the vaccinated.  However, these Covid shots are not actually vaccines — they are genetic biological agents that to this day remain largely untested. (They were tested for only 2 months before being given Emergency Use Authorisation [EUA] approval for public use.) That means if you take them, you become the guinea pig.

Some will respond that Pfizer did test its vaccine before being released. According to their information, over 11,000 people were given the vaccine and carefully followed. Afterwards, they announced the vaccine as 95% effective and quite safe. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) interviewed several women who participated in the so-called pre-release study.  They each in turn had similar stories — Pfizer would not return most of their calls when they experienced serious side effects. They also stated that they signed an agreement that stated should they experience complications Pfizer would assume all costs of their medical care. Several of the ladies stated that Pfizer did not pay a cent of their medical expenses, which ran into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Despite the recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that these companies should test the vaccine for at least 2 years, this suggestion was ignored by Pfizer and Moderna.

Source

Russell Blaylock, a retired American neurosurgeon, wrote the above in an extensive paper, Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?’, published on 8 December 2021 in the Surgical Neurological International journal.  We are republishing sections, more easily digestible portions, of his article as a series of articles titled ‘Covid Pandemic Truths’. 

This article is the second in our series and covers the sections in Blaylocks’s paper as subtitled above.  You can find the first article in this series HERE.

Although we have not included them, Blaylock’s article is well referenced. 

Read Blaylock’s full article – Russell L. Blaylock. Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?. 08-Dec-2021;12:59. – by following this LINK.

Covid Pandemic Truths: The Enormous Effort to Prevent Alternative Views From Being Discussed
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Islander
Islander
17 days ago

Personally, I could foresee “dissenting voices from being openly discussed”, some twenty years ago when I first believed in a Young Earth Creation (YEC). The YEC scientists were becoming increasingly marginalized, censored, shunned, vilified, ridiculed, and the rest, because they didn’t follow the prevailing mainstream evolutionary view. Their teachings must not be given any credence whatsoever.
Evolution is now no more a theory, but a FACT!

So, any views opposing the juggernaut Big Pharma sponsored institutions and universities (whose science is underpinned by evolution), would inevitably be drowned out, which is what we are now witnessing.

No doubt there will be some who visit this site and think my beliefs are whacko, but we can’t have it both ways, can we? Many think creation science has no place in our schools, and ever since the state chucked the Bible out of the classroom, little wonder we are where we are today?

Many still think that we live in a nation that tolerates free speech!

Fleur
Fleur
Reply to  Islander
17 days ago

“Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.” ― Albert Einstein

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
17 days ago

Yes, those who have seen there are problems with several of the mainstream ideas over years of our lives were possibly in a better position when Covid poisons came out to realise that they might not be the grand picture the news on the telly was telling us. Rather, those who have swallowed everything the telly says for decades, I think, were more likely to just take the jabs without question.

Take this quote by an evolutionist journalist: ‘Regardless of the cause, evolutionists are most concerned about the effect of a faster mutation rate. For example, researchers have calculated that “mitochondrial Eve”– the woman whose mtDNA was ancestral to that in all living people—lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago in Africa. Using the new clock, she would be a mere 6000 years old. No one thinks that’s the case, but at what point should models switch from one mtDNA time zone to the other?- Ann Gibbons, ‘Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock’, Science, 1998

Interestingly, 6000 years is around the length of time Archbishop James Ussher gave for the age of the Earth.

NHS Fired Agency Worker
NHS Fired Agency Worker
17 days ago

Thank you for posting. I am still in shock after having been ‘terminated’ by the staffing agency by an NHS based Merseyside Trust for having expressed a negative opinion of the highly toxic covid vaccines after having gotten injured from the first ‘jab’ and for refusing to get any more covid vaccines. I was fired on the basis of gross misconduct, not entitled to any sort of advance notice or disciplinary hearing. So apparently the argument was made that NHS staffers are NOT ALLOWED to EXPRESS ANY NEGATIVE OPINION about covid vaccines to ANYONE. This is a total disgrace.

Commenter
Commenter
Reply to  NHS Fired Agency Worker
16 days ago

Shameful to UK’s history of freedom of choice and civil conduct. Thanks for sharing. Funny how anything that opposes chosen narrative in UK is not allowed. Social media bans you for analysing effects of Islam & other cultures on UK. No nuance allowed. NHS is busy recruiting foreign staff who do not question covid narrative generally. They come from Commonwealth & will do whatever they’re told and blame everything that goes wrong on white Brits.

Paul Prichard
Paul Prichard
17 days ago

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2022-06-18. Jab’s S protein & progressive loss of cognitive & motor function, same as fluoride. 5X Myocarditis in children (blog, gab, tweet).