Wandering through the open sewer called the internet, I got lost and found myself in the corner of the internet where toxic, putrescent solids and excrescences collect to share odours and bacteria and I found myself in the company of a deception of fact checkers. (A ‘deception’ is the collective term for fact checkers.)
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
One of the fact checkers I encountered (by accident rather than design) was someone called Dave Van Zandt, who edits a website called Media Bias Fact Check. Dave describes his site as ‘the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet’. He has five volunteers to help him and admits that none of his team is a professional journalist. Dave says he ‘currently works full time in the health care industry’ though he doesn’t say whether he is a brain surgeon or a hospital car park attendant or a drug company sales representative.
This open letter is addressed to him.
How exciting it was to find your fact checking website. You are, I believe, the one millionth ‘independent’ fact checker now operating on the internet and I would like to congratulate you. From the style of your website I originally thought you were quite young. There is no photo but I’d guessed that you are probably no more than 16-years-old, maybe younger. How exciting it must be, I thought, for one so young to have so much power when your contemporaries are playing basketball or hacking into NASA. And then I see that you claim to have spent more than 20 years as an arm chair researcher. My word.
And what a thrill it must be, Dave, to be able to able to boast (as you do) that your website is used as a resource by BBC News, among many other media organisations.
It’s a pity you don’t explain precisely where your funding comes from (whose names are on the supporters’ cheques, for example) but I expect the money comes pouring in to the Van Zandt bank account these days. Running a fact checking business is, I’m told, the second quickest way to become a billionaire these days. (The quickest is to sell Personal Protective Equipment to the Government – but you really need to be related to a leading politician to go down that route to infinite wealth.)
And it’s a pity that you don’t tell your readers how many university science and medicine degrees you have tucked away in the bottom drawer of your bedside cabinet. (I’ve had a little bet with myself that you still live at home with Mum and Dad and that you run your global fact checking business from your bedroom. But I could be wrong. Maybe you run it out of the garage. Of course, it’s always possible that you have a huge building in the centre of New York.)
I’m sorry to hear that you don’t seem to have a medical degree because I’d have thought you would have felt shy about commenting on complex medical issues without one of those.
I wanted to write to you, Dave, to try to explain a couple of things to you; thoughts that perhaps slipped past you when you were at school.
One of the videos of mine which you have branded ‘FALSE’ is something called ‘Covid Vaccines are Weapons of Mass Destruction – and could wipe out of the human race’.
You also describe it as ‘misinformation’.
Now, there are one or two small problems here, Dave.
The first is that everything in that video was carefully researched and is accurate. I note that you seem to have based your judgement on material on a site called Politifact which itself contains errors. They say I have a Facebook video. But I have never had a Facebook account. They say that in 2019 I authored a book aimed at discrediting trust in vaccines. That’s not true either. They report that there is no clear evidence that the coronavirus vaccines have killed or will kill anyone. I don’t think I’m the only doctor in the world to disagree with that. (Indeed, how can anyone write that a drug will never kill anyone? After decades of analysing drugs I just don’t understand how someone who can say that, and expect to be taken seriously, dares to denounce my work as FALSE. In particular, how do they know what will happen in the future?) And yet they describe my video’s claim as inaccurate and ridiculous. Really?
(By the way, another fact checker claims they wrote to me c/o the email address on my website. There is no email address on my website.)
You can’t just put the label FALSE on something because, well, you don’t agree with it, Dave. And even if other doctors disagree with the evidence I’ve provided that doesn’t mean they are right and I’m wrong. Did you bother to look to see how long I have been investigating drug company claims – and how many times I’ve been right? Even the British Government has acted on my warnings.
And the video title contains the word ‘could’ – implying that I am warning about a possibility. How can you rate that as FALSE?
Dave doesn’t like another video of mine called ‘Doctors and Nurses giving the covid-19 vaccine will be tried as war criminals.’ He labels that one FALSE, based on yet another fact checker called Lead Stories.
But you will see, Dave, if you read the title of the video very carefully, that that the word ‘will’ appears in there. It is the eighth word if you count from the beginning.
Now, the thing about the word ‘will’, Dave, is that it suggests that something is going to happen in the future and that, I’m afraid, means that unless you have direct access to the future you really don’t know whether I am right or wrong and so you can’t say my prediction is FALSE. I’m pretty darned tooting sure that I’m right with my prediction, because I’ve looked at all the facts and I’ve got some nice letters after my name which say I’ve studied these things for many years, and you may well think that I’m wrong but you can’t possibly know for sure, Dave, unless you can see into the future in which case I would suggest that you abandon the fact checking business and go into the horse racing tipster business.
I don’t suppose the BBC News cares much about any of this but then did you know that the BBC has a financial relationship with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – and that the organisation has links with the vaccine industry?
To support your claims, Dave, you say that I am a conspiracy theorist and an AIDS denialist. Do you have any proof of the first? No, I thought not. And as for AIDS, I haven’t written about AIDS since 1988 in a book called, The Health Scandal which was published in the UK as a hardback and a paperback by very reputable publishers. And I simply quoted a good many scientific papers and pointed out the inaccuracies in establishment claims that AIDS was going to affect us all by the year 2000. (Who was right about that one, then, Dave?) Are you possibly referring to an article about me which appeared in a Bangkok newspaper and then got widely quoted? That was an odd thing. You forgot to mention, by the way, that for around 30 years I was one of the highest paid journalists in the UK and that I’ve written over 100 books which have sold millions of copies in 26 languages and in over 50 countries. I’m 76 years old now and pretty well retired from all that hustle and bustle but I still care passionately about providing people with the truth.
Oh, and one last thing, Dave, if you say critical things and you copy out comments and judgements from other people’s internet sites (even if they are big sites) it’s a good idea to check with the person you’re writing about beforehand. Anyway, you’ll be thrilled to know I’ve added you to my ever growing list of people to be sued. Oh, and the libel laws in England, where I’m based, are much tougher than the place where I’m guessing you are based and just saying ‘I copied it out in my best typing’ isn’t much of a defence over here, Dave.
Have you any idea how depressing it is to spend time doing real research and then spend time offering a professional analysis (all without any adverts or sponsorship), only to be attacked in such a way? Do you care? You’re not alone, of course. But that doesn’t make it any more acceptable.
So, it might be a good idea, Dave, to have a word with your Mum and Dad, or maybe the BBC, and ask if they’ll advance you $250,000 for your initial legal costs. Maybe your five volunteers will pull out their wallets and help you. Gosh, isn’t this all exciting. It’s going to be like being a real grown-up, Dave! It’ll be a while before the writ arrives but the anticipation is always half the fun, isn’t it? Meanwhile, you could always try limiting the damages by publishing a grovelling apology and a large correction. Just printing this letter on your website would be a start.
P.S. As I am sure you know, Dave, Friedrich Schiller was doubtless thinking of today’s unsightly rash of fact checkers when he said: ‘Truth lives on in the midst of deception’. I expect Schiller is one of your favourite figures in German literature. As I am sure you know he also said: ‘With stupidity the Gods themselves struggle in vain.’ Herr Schiller is dead by the way and so if you want to fact check him you can do so safely.
Dr Vernon Coleman is the author of Coleman’s Laws – The twelve medical truths you must know to survive. Coleman’s Laws is available as a paperback and an eBook.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
Dr. Vernon Coleman, a man with very clear ideas based on scientific research and data. I am certain Jeff Childers from cofffee and covid substack would support your efforts Dr. Coleman if the need arises.💕
traveler and student with global glareAuthor has 1.9K answers and 1.1M answer viewsUpdated Feb 1
“Dave Van Zandt is the primary editor for sources. He is assisted by a collective of volunteers who assist in research for many sources listed on these pages.”
There is nothing to suggest that this website has any value beyond the opinion of one Dave Zandt…and some ‘writers’ and ‘researchers’ which include a retired accountant and insurance saleswoman, someone with a degree in politics from Ireland, a pleasant seeming chap named Ken, married, who hates nazis…and another man who is studying psychology.
I have nothing against some lad fresh out of uni with a politics degree, or those who hate nazis, and aspiring psychologist but what I register from this team is that they have zero experience to suggest their opinions are any more accurate than my own when it comes to judging the veracity of news sites. In fact given I could produce 10–15 years of writing editorials in various places about the news, I find myself more qualified. They are not experts, of anything to do with the main task in hand – judging credibility of news platforms online.
Dave Van Z, whose methodology is basically he decides what is fact and what is fake. These decisions are not presented as in ‘found X’ and this is false as proven here at ‘Y’. The judgements are delivered, a colourful chart and some generic texts found on all the entries, slightly adjusted to meet the rating. I believe Mr Zandt used to work in a Health Retail sector, but may be wrong!
My suspicion, with any of the plethora or ‘fact checking’ websites which have abounded in the last decade, many promoted by the corporate sector, is that they have been created, generally, to look as independent as possible yet all have been given lists of the sites to condemn as fake and dodgy, and the sites to promote as trustworthy.
A quick litmus test helps with this:
wikileaks – never proven to have reported false, fake, misleading news. Not once. Why do you think Assange remains rotting in a UK dungeon wheeled out now and then for one of the most appalling show trials in recent UK history? for telling some crazed conspiracy theories? for manufacturing emails implicating Hilary Clinton as a war mongering supporter of jihadists and mass deceit merchants? for fabricating footage of US soldiers gunning down journalists and civilians?
Overall, we rate WikiLeaks a borderline Conspiracy website with a Left-Center Bias based on a combination of progressive views, coupled with limited Government Libertarian positions. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of the Seth Rich-DNC Conspiracy Theory, as well as connections to the Russian Government and frequent use of anonymous sources.
From the MBFC site.
Conspiracy website which has never had anything reported proven false. Which is fine, but the wording is curious, as conspiracy to many people means some tin hat crackpot routine, which is false. Not the actual definition –
make secret plans jointly to commit an unlawful or harmful act.
Still, they go on to condemn wikileaks as mixed for credibility, based apparently on Dave or perhaps the aspiring psychologist or insurance saleswoman deciding they disagreed with wikileaks reporting on Seth Rich.
Not sure what they mean about ‘connections to the russian government’ given wikileaks are not great chums with that state power after their expose of the russian state surveillance operation>
Spy Files Russia
So that claim of MBFC seems nonsensical, and with no facts given to validate/confirm. Just a thinking that wikileaks are wrong on something never proven wrong…and guilty of something, never proven and with reality demonstrating against.
Let us take one of the more obvious mass deceit platforms of the West, and I will offer why I suggest this…the NYT. Their most recent ‘work’ has been to create and disseminate the idea that Russia paid the Taliban to kill US soldiers. They have since produced zero evidence to confirm this, but happily spread the story.
There remains no evidence.
The NYT is owned by one of the founding members of the Bildeberg group. The Sulzberger family.
A crowd of the Western elite who come together from the military, mass media, financial, intelligence agencies and petroleum corporations to work on where they can :
Or…they just meet to clink glasses and pat each on the back for what a fine job they are doing?
The NYT owners interest are aligned with the US military industrial complex,top levels of western financial empire, the major petroleum companies, US and their partner intelligence agencies, NATO.
It should then come as no surprise to find that the NYT routinely leans towards these crowds, following an agenda to suit their interests, and often mass producing outright lies to achieve this.
Not a word of this is mentioned by MBFC. Could well be that they have no interest in research? Or that none of the above is of any value when deducing the credibility and bias of a news platform? The latter of which would make no sense whatsoever for a bias checking routine…
Another great one by the NYT –
“A cease-fire in Ukraine was declared last year, but Russian forces still maintain a presence in eastern Ukraine, raising questions about whether Russia might try to extend its reach to the Baltic States.”
Zero proof, but what the hell eh! If millions read us, millions will believe us, who needs any truth? People will just say ‘the NYT confirmed it!’. True enough.
The rating scale used on the website that fails to base its ratings on quantifiable data is worthless. Van Zandt’s ratings are worthless except to tell you his opinion and the opinion of a retired insurance saleswoman, a married man who hates nazis and a lad who completed a politics degree in Ireland.
Media Bias / Fact Check’s rankings are based on a scale that Van Zandt developed on his own; the research and reporting are done by volunteers, with none of them having any demonstrable expertise to persuade you they should be more trusted than someone you meet at a bus stop and know nothing about.
This is sort of fighting with windmills: the descent man confronted with immorality and recklessness of high level.
The satanists wrote in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which they claim “fabricated”, they will leave a few voices of protest, just to be able to say they are themselves liberal.
Your brilliant Dr Coleman, I’ve been following you since the start of this scam. Anyone who still thinks covid is Real, is dillusional .
[…] Wandering through the open sewer called the internet, I got lost and found myself in the corner of the internet where toxic, putrescent solids and excrescences collect to share odours and bacteria […] Source link […]
[…] Source link Author The Exposé […]
Brilliant, Dr Coleman. Thank you.
[…] THE EXPOSÉ ON AUGUST 30, 2022 […]
Think we got it wrong?Here’s a handy checklist for how you can put us on the right path.Steve Kirsch Executive Director, Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (vacsafety.org)
21 hr ago
“Suing for defamation”? In this ever increasingly corrupt age, sincerely, I hope his case will be heard by an impartial judge!
Brilliant letter, Dr Coleman. I wish you every success in fighting this ‘independent’ ‘fact checker’.
The Biotech Plan To Destroy Us
August 30, 2022
The Biotech Plan To Destroy Us
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Your right bang on Dr. Vernon Coleman and even if you didn’t have the degree your common sense approach alone makes me a supporter of you and your team
Well said, Dr. Coleman. I’ve always enjoyed your feistiness.
Thank You Dr. Coleman for publishing THE TRUTH about COVID-19 quackcines and then standing by it! The fact that you are confronting this lier will hopefully wake up more sheeple! I post publicly on MeWe.
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH’S SAINTS!