Breaking News

Is it Possible to Patent Genetically-Modified Humans?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“When we’re modifying the genome of an organism we can put our signature, our name, into the genome.” – “What is God? God creates. Well, we can create now.” – “We deserve to be credited for our work. We have lobbyists in politics and the courts to make sure the patenting and owning of parts of the human genome continues.”

Not word for word but, these are recollections by Dr. Carrie Madej of remarks made by Dr. Craig Venter of the Human Genome Project during a speech in 2014.  Dr. Venter also talked about how vaccines could be useful to modify people’s genomes.  Dr. Madej discussed this during an interview, watch HERE (starting at 45 mins).

In 2010, on creating the world’s first synthetic life form Dr. Venter said, “the achievement heralds the dawn of a new era in which new life is made to benefit humanity, starting with bacteria that churn out biofuels, soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and even manufacture vaccines.” Dr. Venter’s technology paved the way for designer organisms to be built rather than be allowed to naturally evolve, and he owns the patent.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


In 2018, Dr. Charles Morgan gave the presentation below to cadets at West Point, US Military Academy. He covered a range of topics including psychology, neurobiology, and the science of humans at war. It is a mind-blowing presentation and well worth the one-hour watch.

Modern War Institute: Dr. Charles Morgan on Psycho-Neurobiology and War, 15 July 2018 (56 mins)

Starting at around 28 mins, Dr. Morgan discusses work being done by Dr. Venter stating, “[his] work is, in my view, the equivalent of the development of nuclear weapons when you realise that he created life in a cell back in 2010.”

Dr. Venter’s technology paired with CRISPR enables “you to engineer anything you like,” for example: designer medicine and therapy, or, a unique thing that would only kill one person in the world.  This is because “you put in a specific gene slicing, you program what you like, you put it in the cell and it can reproduce and make as much as you like.” Dr. Morgan continues, “You can create a designer receptor.  You can create a cell, you can put it somewhere in the body, and you can remotely activate it when the brain is exposed to the right signal.”  Using this technology memories have been transferred from one fruit fly to another by signalling, through a light stimulus, into the retina.

DNA can hold a staggering amount of information. Between CRISPR, the storage capacity of DNA and programming cells the new way to hide information will be in DNA.  Starting at around 36 mins, Dr Morgan shows a GIF file that had been “hidden” in the DNA of bacteria. When the bacteria reproduced, the offspring carried the DNA containing the GIF and produced the encoded movie. This idea was being developed further. “The Chinese are fairly convinced that DNA encryption encoding would be one tremendous challenge even for quantum computing. So, this is where the race is right now. Trying to merge quantum computing with what you call a wet hard drive, with DNA,” Dr. Morgan said.

Dr. Morgan’s presentation it is truly an eye-opener.  It demonstrates how advanced technology was at the time and this is merely the information available in the public domain.  

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein is Patented

Equally eye-opening is evidence gathered by Dr. David E. Martin regarding the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Governments, their advisors and legacy media would have us believe that SARS-CoV-2 is naturally occurring – it is a lie. Dr. Martin has conducted extensive research on coronavirus patents.  During an interview with the Corona Investigative Committee, Dr. Martin revealed the true origins of SARS-COV-2 and its infamous spike protein.

Over 4000 patents have been issued around SARS coronavirus. Until 1999 the patenting activity was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences.  The NIAID made SARS, a coronavirus that specifically targets human lung epithelium, and patented it on 19 April 2002.  Between 2008 and 2019 there were 73 patents issued, to numerous organisations, which have the elements that were allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2, more specifically its spike protein. The Covid-19 injection was never intended to be a vaccine.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Odysee.

Corona Investigative Committee: Session 60, Time is Not a Flat Circle | Dr. David E. Martin, 9 July 2021 (1 hr 51 mins)

You can read the transcript for the video above, including links to patents, HERE.

Legal Implications of Patented Genes

In 2003 NBC News published an article titled ‘Scientists race to patent SARS virus’:

Researchers around the world are racing to patent the SARS virus and its genetic material, rekindling criticism of laws that allow people to claim intellectual property rights on living things.

Several biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. government and researchers in Canada and Hong Kong have filed SARS-related patent applications in recent weeks, claiming ownership of everything from bits of genetic material to the virus itself.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for instance, claims ownership of the virus and its entire genetic content.

The race to patent the SARS virus has revived the debate about the ethics of a pivotal US Supreme Court ruling in 1980 [see below] that cleared the way for the US Patent and Trademark Office to award patents for living things, most notably individual human genes.

“These are discoveries of nature and it’s baloney that we allow patents on living things,” said Jeremy Rifkin, a prominent anti-biotechnology author. “We didn’t allow chemists to patent the periodic table — there’s no patent on hydrogen and I don’t see why they can patent discoveries of nature.”

In the spring of 1980, PBC filed a legal brief before the US Supreme Court on the case Diamond vs. Chakrabarty. At issue was whether General Electric would be allowed to become the first US corporation to be granted a commercial patent on a genetically engineered living organism.

The US Supreme Court ruled, five to four, that human-made life forms may be patented. The decision gave companies the go-ahead to create new forms of life and the right to own and control that life for 17 years under patent law. The case before the court involved a new micro-organism created by a scientist working for General Electric. This particular life form had never before existed in nature – four plasmids were added to a bacterium, enabling the bacterium to break down various components of crude oil.

In the video below Jeremy Rifkin explained what happened.

A Patent on Living Things, Mr. Smith on Twitter

In 2013, ‘Pathology vs. Myriad Genetics’, the US Supreme Court ruled complementary DNA (“cDNA”) could be patented: “the lab technician unquestionably creates something new when cDNA is made”.  cDNA is a form of DNA artificially synthesised from a messenger RNA template.  It is used in genetic engineering to produce gene clones.

The petitioners asked the US Supreme Court to address the legal question of whether human genes are patentable. Based on the Supreme Court’s analysis, the answer was a resounding and unanimous “no.”

However, the 2013 ruling is important in the context of Covid because it means the synthetic genes encoded in the injections, and consequently, the spike protein manufactured within people’s bodies, are owned by the patent holder and can be pursued for private gain.  Additionally, if the genetic code for the spike protein integrates into human DNA, in legal terms, it is possible that people altered by it would be considered genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”).  It may be that GMOs, or genetically modified human beings, are patented and could be placed under license agreements which could be negotiated without their knowledge.  As James Corbett discussed in a 2020 podcast, It is unclear what the practical implications of the 2013 ruling for “vaccinated” people will be and further court rulings will most likely be needed to clarify their legal position.

In a Twitter thread, Alex Dalassio argued: “The Supreme Court ruled [in Pathology vs. Myriad Genetics] that you cannot patent human DNA as it was ‘a product of nature’.  But at the end of the ruling the Supreme Court did rule that if you were to change a human’s genome by mRNA vaccines then the genome can be patented … technically, anyone who receives these medical devices [mRNA vaccines] could no longer have any access to human rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so clarification should be available on this soon.”

You can read Dalassio’s Twitter thread on Thread Reader App HERE and the Supreme Court ruling HERE.

The truth is these scientists are not creating. They are corrupting what has already been created. Additionally, God did not create in order to own and then sell for profit.  This is the very definition of slavery. These so-called scientists are far from being “like God”.  Are all scientists and scientific endeavours evil? No. Has evil taken control of mainstream science? Yes.

Thinking logically, if it were impossible to patent and commercialise the building blocks of life – including any man-modified forms (cDNA, GMOs and synthetic life) – then the “pandemic” and the “vaccines” would never have happened.  The world would never have known Covid-19.  To bring this to an end and ensure it never happens again, could it really be as simple as a change to a man-made law?  It would be interesting to hear the perspective from patent lawyers.

A word of warning to those scientists hoping to achieve godlike status: your arrogance will be your downfall and the higher you rise the harder you will fall.  Because we, the people, with God on our side will no longer tolerate it.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

4.3 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MorganLeFey
MorganLeFey
1 month ago

The way is which these technologies are being used is always unlawful because this kind of alteration of any human’s genetic material constitutes enslavement.

Htos1av
Htos1av
Reply to  MorganLeFey
1 month ago

The “t(h)urd worlders made a “deal” with W and cheney, after 9/11, and they’re here to “collect” on that deal…and secure the “other” white meat for the collections.
I hope people understand EXACTLY what has been done TO them…

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  MorganLeFey
1 month ago

For me it also has to do with the devious way, they want to make the “alteration of any human’s genetic material”. If everything is to be believed – enslavement on those that remain is the plan, but it did not need to be like that at all.

I keep on banging on that they always tell us or even show us, what they “dream of” … I put a few trailers up the other day, but stupididly forgot this one. Did you know that for less than the US war budget, we could end “World Hunger”, supply decent fresh water to everyone and cut the cirth rates in the so called 3rd World Countries by at least a half (no – not through sterilisation or war, but by good health, wealth and support for old age and and) … and that is why I believe these globalist parasites are evil scum.

https://www.imdb.com/video/vi4196837657/?playlistId=tt1535108

Jimmy Jukebox
Jimmy Jukebox
1 month ago

Hi ,
Well Thanks for writing this cause I think people need to be aware of what’s going on or what happened.
I have seen the west point lecture and even looked up the night vision experiment mentioned in the west point lecture and even though it’s horrible what this means.
I saw this and read up on it awhile ago.
I have a article link with the 2013 supreme court ruling that Scalia signed , I looked up your link and they are the same except my link someone highlighted in yellow on page 21 how a genetically modified human becomes property of the vaccine patent holder.
I have 2 link both are videos of why this is being done.
1 is 6 minutes video and the other video is 6 hours and some mins.
Short video 1st

https://www.brighteon.com/34364bd8-1238-4e8d-af58-0169726ca822

https://www.brighteon.com/448a05ef-95a8-44ef-911e-b7345007fa39

People may not want to face the truth of what this Really means.
But a little Research will confirm it.

Abomination Desolation Time Period is mentioned in The Bible.

Digital Currency is being tested around the world by different countries , some Countries Are even Microchipping their citizens.

IF God and Jesus Don’t exist like an Atheist says , then is it really enslavement ?
And he made those free and bond rich and poor to take a mark.

They all marveled at the 1 who’s head wound was healed and they end up worshipping said deity.

Jimmy Jukebox,

Htos1av
Htos1av
Reply to  Jimmy Jukebox
1 month ago

Haven’t seen JFK lately, have you?

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – Is it Possible to Patent Genetically-Modified Humans? […]

Maria
Maria
1 month ago

No, they do not “create” anything, they just uses and changes the already existing creation. Their lack of understanding the difference only speaks about how far away they are from understanding anything at all.

God says that He did create everything by His Word. Words are the same as “soundwaves”.
Science says that everything is hold together by soundwaves which confirms what God says.

Htos1av
Htos1av
Reply to  Maria
1 month ago

The vibrational frequencies of atomic structures is what was written down by those with no formal scientific training, but were still >100 iq level types.

Maria
Maria
Reply to  Htos1av
1 month ago

Yes, they got that knowledge from “somewhere” , from God Himself, because you cannot fond it out by yourself No matter your ” IQ”.

A Close friend of mine has the highest graduating in “Quantum physics”. She had no foreknowledge about it, but did through prayer receive the matematic formulas directly by revelation from the Lord.

This worlds way of doing things and its so called “knowledge” is nothing.

Htos1av
Htos1av
1 month ago

ALREADY DONE!! How dumb these people were at allow their DNA to be recoded, that means automatic rejection on Judgement Day as you took the mark.

Glen Runowski
Glen Runowski
1 month ago

These psychopaths haven’t created life, they have merely altered it. They are narcissists with a God complex, but they will never be God.

john
john
1 month ago

In order for slavery to continue after the fraud surrounding the state issued birth certificate came to light, the crud had to find another mechanism for slavery.
Their intent (patent holder) was indeed to claim ownership over all those that have been injected with a GMO kill shot.
This ensures the crud can continue to pilfer the credit that every man, woman and child is owed. Without the individuals signature, the fraud birth certificate, drivers license, passport, bank account (none of which belong to a man or woman) the crud would have no access to that credit.
It is because people accept any derivative of their true name, when none of the NAME’s on any state I.D is the individual.
Stupidity = slavery.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Is it Possible to Patent Genetically-Modified Humans? […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Is it Possible to Patent Genetically-Modified Humans? […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Is it Possible to Patent Genetically-Modified Humans?“When we’re modifying the genome of an organism we can put our signature, our name, into the genome.” – “What is God? God creates. Well, we can create now.” – “We deserve to be credited for our work. We have lobbyists in politics and the courts to make sure the patenting and owning of parts of the human genome continues.” […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] via Expose-News […]

Demeter
Demeter
1 month ago

So disgusted at the filth trying to equate themselves with the creator(s)/designer(s) of this beautiful place, i actually feel sick, near deathly sick.

Doesn’t matter if this particular, potential version we live is actually a simulation, it’s perfectly designed, beyond amazing, completely deserving of awe. Everything is a perfect complement, promoting love, joy, natural health etc, if we just appreciate and understand. Unless it’s corrupted by something like the darkness of a minuscule minority, as has happened in this case.

Not religious but feel outrage these fools think they are creators, natural law says they create nothing, all they do corrupt/contaminate but personally question how long their pathetic efforts can be effective. Everything in our collective home leads to health and happiness in any way i can conceive, just a few want to stop us seeing the magic.

Not Gnostic thinking in any way, whether one or some created this wondrous place, it’s perfect. Simulation or the real battleground every choice we make is crucial, the filth want to destroy the perfection and remove our very humanity, take away what makes us human. We can’t let them win.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Adding to that comment, they can’t take away our humanity unless we truly agree to let them.

They can create any false laws they want but if you don’t comply in full knowledge, surely true/natural law applies. We all make a myriad of errors but don’t think we actually comply with evil, unless we have real knowledge.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Another strong belief of mine is NEVER succumb to the Filth’s labels. I’m what’s labelled communist/collectivist, so was the Biblical Jesus, truly happy to even have a breath of similar air.

The Filth put labels on stuff to promote hatred of anything which disagrees with their evil desires. Anything which promotes consideration of others/fairness is anathema to them. Same has been done to right wing tendencies until recently, please don’t fall for it.

In recent history, they have co-opted prominent beliefs from all sides of the spectrum to help fulfil their agenda. Much easier than creating new beliefs. If we don’t have open minds, we’re much easier to manipulate and accidentally help them.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Refuse to play their game/enable them.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Patenting of GMO Humanshttps://expose-news.com/2022/10/24/possible-to-patent-genetically-modified-humans/ […]

trackback
20 days ago

[…] Patented That Human Beings Are Transformed Into Genetically-modified Humans […]