Breaking News

The Australian Government Lied: Doctors are NOT covered by Government’s indemnity for Covid Injections

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Last week Elizabeth Hart wrote to Mark Butler, Australian Minister for Health and Aged Care, about the government misleading health practitioners who are administering Covid injections into believing they are covered by a government medical indemnity scheme. “It has now been confirmed by your department that health practitioners are not covered by a specific Covid-19 government medical indemnity scheme,” she wrote.

Elizabeth Hart is an independent researcher investigating the overuse of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.

According to a response Hart received on 17 November from Nigel Murray – Assistant Secretary, MBS Policy and Specialist Services Branch – the government did not put in place a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals.  Instead, Murray told Hart, “the former [Morrison] Government established the no-fault Scheme, which commenced operations on 13 December 2021.”  Later in the same letter, he again confirmed the scheme did not exist:

“While a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the Covid-19 vaccine was not established per se, the creation of the no-fault Scheme was intended to support increased participation by health professionals in the Covid-19 Vaccination roll-out.”

Hart informed Butler, the promise of “a medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the Covid-19 vaccine” probably did intend “to support increased participation by health professionals in the Covid-19 Vaccination roll-out”. But it turns out they are not personally protected by a government scheme.  She explained to Butler:

In July 2021, the Morrison Government stated it was establishing a “fit-for-purpose Covid-19 vaccine medical indemnity scheme” to “support increased vaccination uptake by assuring Australians that health professionals, including GPs, nurses and pharmacists administering Covid vaccines as part of the Commonwealth vaccination program have appropriate indemnity coverage”, with a further announcement in August 2021 stating “The Morrison Government has finalised the details of the no-fault Covid-19 Vaccine Claim Scheme following extensive consultation with the peak medical, healthcare, business and insurance sectors to ensure a comprehensive National Scheme”, noting “It also ensure [sic] that health professionals administering vaccines will be able to continue with their crucial role in the vaccine roll out with assurance that the claims scheme will offer them protection”

But it now turns out health professionals are not personally protected by a specific Covid-19 medical indemnity scheme.

The letter from Nigel Murray also confirms: “Informed consent should be obtained for every Covid-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.”

Mark Butler, it appears health practitioners don’t have specific government medical indemnity re the Covid jab rollout, although they might think they do. They will have to look to their own medical indemnity insurance to protect them. And they should be obtaining informed consent for every Covid-19 jab…but is this actually happening?

What is the quality of information being provided to people, including parents of children, to enable them to properly evaluate the threat of SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19, and the risks and benefits of the multiple Covid jabs, in their own specific circumstances? Why are people of most ages and health status being called upon to have the Covid-19 jabs? Who is actually at serious risk with SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19? Does having repeated Covid jabs compromise the immune system and make people more vulnerable? Nigel Murray includes reference to the ‘Covid-19 vaccination – Patient resources’ webpage in his letter, but this webpage only includes information re Covid jabs for children, not for adults. Nigel Murray’s letter also includes a link to a ‘Consent form for Covid-19 vaccination’.

How does this information re Covid jabs referred to by Nigel Murray stack up in the ‘valid informed consent’ stakes? I would say not very well at all…

This is an extremely serious situation, Mark Butler – it’s highly likely ‘valid informed consent’ has not been properly obtained by many health practitioners before administering Covid-19 jabs.

The health practitioners inserting the needle must be warned they’re not protected by a specific government Covid medical indemnity scheme after all…and they need to consider the quality of the information they’re providing to people to gain their ‘valid informed consent’ to the jabs. They must also consider the impact of jab mandates – which pressure, coerce and manipulate people to submit to Covid jabs, in contravention of The Australian Immunisation Handbook, i.e., jab mandates inhibit a ‘voluntary’ decision.

Mark Butler, please advise what steps you are taking to address this matter.

This email is being circulated to other parties, including the response from your department.

Health practitioners, Covid jabs and ‘valid informed consent’ – a medical ethics disaster, Elizabeth Hart emails

As Dr. Mike Yeadon noted on his Telegram channel: “This has all the appearance of government throwing medical staff under the bus on liability & requirements for informed consent.”

Two days later, Hart forwarded her email trail with Butler to Kamran Abbasi, editor-in-chief of the British Medical Journal (“BMJ”), copying in numerous “people influential on international public health/vaccination policy via the scientific and medical establishment, and other parties.”  People copied into her email included infamous modeller Neil Ferguson, UK’s Chief (Covid) Medical Adviser Chris Whitty, President of the Royal Society, and Oxford/AstraZeneca injection’s developers Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert.

The BMJ claims to be evidence-based and patient-centred and customer-focused – surely ensuring ‘valid informed consent’ before medical interventions, such as Covid jabs, should be foremost in your values?

Sadly, ‘valid informed consent’ appears to have been sacrificed during the grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted Covid debacle. This scandal is now unfolding in Australia.

FYI, please see [above] my response to Australian federal health minister Mark Butler, on the subject of health practitioners’ medical indemnity insurance for Covid-19 jab administration, and health practitioners’ obligation to obtain ‘informed consent’.

This information has major implications for health practitioners administering Covid-19 jabs in Australia – they need to know they’re not covered by a specific government Covid-19 medical indemnity scheme, and that they’re obligated to obtain informed consent before every Covid-19 jab.

But I strongly suspect many health practitioners have failed to obtain ‘valid informed consent’ before the Covid jabs. How have things gone so terribly wrong?

This is a very serious situation, Kamran Abbasi, at the heart of medical ethics. This should be a priority topic on the BMJ.

Health practitioners, Covid jabs and ‘valid informed consent’ – a medical ethics disaster, Elizabeth Hart emails
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
W. A. O'Gorman
W. A. O'Gorman
2 months ago

If the same applies here – which it may well do – it will take their minds off 9 til 5 working!

trackback
2 months ago

[…] The Australian Government Lied: Doctors are NOT covered by Government’s indemnity for Covid Inject… […]

186no
186no
2 months ago

If, here in the UK where I live, the same “standard of proof” that was required of “providers” to whom people complained about “PPI misselling” or “Endowment Mortgage misselling” or similar alleged “misselling” so called scandals in the UK Financial Services sector (all of which did happen to some degree), was required of all those in the UK medical professions and/or co-opted volunteers who supported , promoted and actually delivered ( in person or “vicariously”), the medical sector in the UK would be immediately and severely impacted. For those medical professionals who, for whatever reason, would not be able to be covered by some kind of over-arching indemnity, they would need to fall back on their professional indemnity insurance. In the event of an avalanche of claims from many thousands of medics, Insurers would invoke any and all tactics to avoid paying out wherever they can get away with that tactic, for fear of corporate bankruptcy; this might include determining whether any “insured” did anything to encourage a claim which might invalidate their cover. I wonder if this is what is “encouraging” medics to “keep their heads down”; their silence about and/or continuing “support” for these jabs cannot be blind ignorance. What a world of s*** we are in?

john
john
2 months ago

Who shall hold them liable?
Any body using the legal fiction NAME cannot ever hold these criminals to account for their crimes. The dead are lifeless, voiceless and devoid of soul. Only a Man or Women who has returned ALL legal titles to their rightful owner and returned to the living in their Christ/Christian name/s have the standing to bring charges.
The living have ALL power over the dead. The pretend Australian Government is a dead Corporate entity, that it too, is voiceless and soulless with zero power against the living.
In past history, genocide has been used as a tool every time the people realised the Truth.

Jimmy Jukebox
Jimmy Jukebox
2 months ago

Hi,
What a messed up world.. I enjoyed reading this article hopefully doctors will realize to stop giving these Covid-19 shots ,

I enjoyed the column / link with the info about Milton J Rosenau Flu Experiments in 1919,
Here’s a link if anyone missed it,
https://expose-news.com/2022/11/09/germ-theory-a-theory-not-proven/

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Jimmy Jukebox
2 months ago

Dr. Rosenau already knew what the outcome of his experiments would have been before he began because of earlier experiments on the same, if not precisely the same experiments that were carried out by doctors prevously, but for some reason Dr. Rosenau’s stand tall. Tried to find reference in “The Truth About Contagion” but pressed for time. Reference is either in this book by Thomas S. Cowan, MD, and Sally Fallon Morell, or in “The Invisible Rainbow” by Arthur Firstenberg. Both should be required reading by all interested in health, IMO.
We have all been conned.
Thanks for the link, information.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] ZDROJ: The Exposé https://expose-news.com/2022/11/27/australian-doctors-are-not-covered-by-gov-indemnity/ […]

biggrump
biggrump
2 months ago

Unfortunately, I fear that many doctors must have known there was something wrong with the jab, if not at first, later when some patients started having bad reactions to it. I would hope that, if I was in their position, I would not keep quiet and carry on jabbing.

PureBlood1778
PureBlood1778
2 months ago

⁣Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. If you want to get Ivermectin you can visit ivmpharmacy.com

Merv
Merv
2 months ago

Thanks for the informative article. Slowly, the truth is being revealed.
Interestingly, just watched Alex Antic, South Australian Senator putting the Senate on notice regarding myocarditis/pericarditis figures via FOI data and it’s exact correlation with rollout of shots and boosters, and spike in numbers. The wall of lies is crumbling.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Read more: Australian Government Lied: Doctors are NOT covered by Government’s indemnity for &#821… […]

Ocean19
Ocean19
1 month ago

Talk about being played! Talk about being used and discarded! Talk about being suckers.
Now practitioners on down to nurses are all vulnerable to being sued out of existence! As the guilty’s coffers overflow with greed and deception.
How devious.