Breaking News

Germ Theory: The clues in the title, it’s just a theory & has never been definitively proven

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The commonly accepted germ theory of illness spread by viruses is just a theory. It has never been proven. Indeed, there is significant evidence that it is wrong. 

The vast majority of people around the world believe that the healthcare system promoted by the agencies responsible for public health, especially the WHO, is firmly based on ‘sound science’. This system, known as ‘modern medicine’, is perceived to represent an ‘elite’ branch of science, which suggests that any other approach to healthcare and healing must be pseudoscience or quackery. This elitist attitude is inculcated into medical students during their training, as experienced by Dr Carolyn Dean, who explains in her book entitled Death by Modern Medicine that,

“In fact, we were told many times that if we didn’t learn it in medical school it must be quackery.”

In his book entitled Confessions of a Medical Heretic, Dr Robert Mendelsohn MD indicates that belief in medical ‘authority’ is misplaced. He expands on his discussion of the problems with ‘modern medicine’ by reference to similarities between beliefs, religion and ‘modern medicine’. He describes the medical establishment as ‘the church of modern medicine’ and justifies this description with the statement that,

“Modern medicine can’t survive without our faith, because modern medicine is neither an art nor a science; it’s a religion…Just ask ‘why’ enough times and sooner or later you’ll reach the chasm of faith.”

It will undoubtedly be a shock for people to discover that ‘modern medicine’ is not firmly established from the basis of true ‘science’. Laboratory experimentation is certainly used within modern medicine, but it would be a mistake to equate such experiments with ‘science’; as Dr Peter Duesberg explains in his book entitled Inventing the AIDS Virus,

“The transition from small to big to mega-science has created an establishment of skilled technicians but mediocre scientists, who have abandoned real scientific interpretation and who even equate their experiments with science itself.”

True science is a process; it is a process that involves the study of different aspects of the world in order to expand the level of human knowledge; it also entails the creation of hypotheses and theories to explain the various phenomena observed during the course of those scientific investigations. As the various studies progress and the body of knowledge increases, they may reveal new information or they may expose anomalies and contradictions within existing hypotheses and theories. In such instances, it is essential for scientists, in whichever field they study, to reassess those hypotheses and theories in the light of the new findings; a process that may necessitate revisions or adaptations to be made to prevailing theories. It may even be necessary to abandon a theory if it is shown to be unsupported by empirical evidence.

One of the main theories on which ‘modern medicine’ is based is the ‘germ theory’; a theory that claims microorganisms, especially bacteria and viruses, invade and infect the body, thereby causing disease. This theory, which is usually attributed to Louis Pasteur in the early 1860s, underpins a large and very significant proportion of medical practices; without it, most of modern medicine becomes redundant, which explains why the medical establishment refuses to recognise its fatal flaws.

The retention of the theory is not unequivocal proof that it has been fully established and represents truth. In fact, research conducted for the book, What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, led the authors to discover that there is no evidence to support the assertions of the medical establishment with respect to the ‘germ theory’. The term ‘medical establishment’ refers to all of the people, organisations, industries, and academic and research institutions that practise, research, teach, promote and otherwise support the system of modern medicine.

It is a fundamental principle that the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory. Yet in the case of the ‘germ theory’ that ‘proof’ does not exist; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively proves that any ‘germ’ causes any specific infectious disease. Although this statement will be regarded as highly controversial and even outrageous, its veracity can be demonstrated.

There are a number of sources that provide a corroboration of the assertion that the ‘germ theory’ lacks any original scientific proof. One of these sources is Dr M.L. Leverson MD, who, in May 1911, gave a lecture in London in which he discussed his investigations that had led him to the conclusion that,

“The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs.”

Dr M Beddow Bayly also exposed the lack of any scientific basis for the ‘germ theory’; in his 1928 article published in the journal London Medical World, he states that,

“I am prepared to maintain with scientifically established facts, that in no single instance has it been conclusively proved that any microorganism is the specific cause of a disease.”

It is clear that evidence to support the ‘germ theory’ remained conspicuous by its absence many decades after it had been proposed by Louis Pasteur. However, the situation has not been rectified; the germ theory of disease remains unproven with overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that it also remains a fallacy.

Despite the authoritative nature of the assertions of the medical establishment that ‘germs’ cause disease, there are no explanations for the mechanisms by which microorganisms produce the wide variety of symptoms in varying degrees of intensity that are claimed to occur when a person becomes ‘infected’. This represents an immense knowledge gap, although not the only one we discovered.

It is claimed that ‘germs’ multiply within the cells of the host and that this can precipitate an excess level of ‘cell death’ that is said to be an indicator of disease. It is commonly assumed that it is the ‘germ’ that caused the cell to die; but this is a mistaken assumption. There are genuine reasons that cells die after they have been subjected to the preparation procedures used in laboratory experiments; as explained by Torsten Engelbrecht and Dr Claus Köhnlein MD in their book entitled Virus Mania,

“This phenomenon is particularly virulent in bacterial and viral research (and in the whole pharmaceutical development of medicines altogether) where laboratory experiments on tissue samples which are tormented with a variety of often highly reactive chemicals allow few conclusions about reality. And yet, conclusions are constantly drawn – and then passed straight on to the production of medications and vaccines.”

This explanation exposes the fundamental error in conducting laboratory research without an adequate understanding of the living organism that is the human body, as they further state,

“Another important question must be raised: even when a supposed virus does kill cells in a test-tube (in vitro) … can we safely conclude that these findings can be carried over to a living organism (in vivo)?”

The assumption that a particular ‘germ’ causes a particular ‘infection’ is solely based on the claim that certain antibodies have sometimes been found in samples extracted from some people exhibiting certain symptoms; in other words, there appears to be a correlation between symptoms and antibodies.

However, antibodies, which are proteins, are described as particles that neutralise ‘pathogens’ and help clear them from the body, which means that they are defined solely within the context of the ‘germ theory’. But this explanation is highly problematic. A strong and fully functioning immune system is claimed to be able to destroy all invaders; ‘infectious agents’ should not therefore be found within the body of a person with a strong immune system. Yet so-called ‘pathogenic’ microorganisms have been found in the bodies of healthy people. One explanation for this situation is that some pathogens can exist in the body in a ‘dormant’ state. But a strong immune system should not permit the presence of any pathogen, even in a ‘dormant’ state.

In an interview conducted in 2005 for the online German newspaper Faktuell, Dr Stefan Lanka referred to his studies in molecular biology and made the bold claim that,

“In the course of my studies, I and others have not been able to find proof of the existence of disease-causing viruses anywhere.”

The following research paper was written by Dr. Milton J. Rosenau, M.D., in 1919.

Most people, and even most doctors, are ignorant of Dr. Resonau’s experiments. Dr. Resenau conducted experiments during the height of the Spanish Flu epidemic. He wanted to establish the means by which influenza was spread. He took 100 healthy volunteers who agreed to be exposed to the Spanish Flu. They were exposed to influenza under controlled conditions but none of them contracted the flu.

Dr. Rosenau explained that his medical team “proceeded rather cautiously at first by administering a pure culture of bacillus of influenza, Pfeiffer’s bacillus, in a rather moderate amount, into the nostrils of a few of these volunteers.” None of the volunteers came down with the flu.

He next obtained the extractions from the lungs of recently deceased flu victims. He then lined up 19 volunteers and used an atomizer to spray the suspensions of the flu extractions into the noses and into the eyes, and back into the throats of 19 volunteers. None of the volunteers contracted the flu.

Dr. Rosenau then obtained material and mucous secretions from the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi of live persons who had the Spanish Flu and transferred that to 10 volunteers by spraying the infected phlegm directly “into each nostril and into the throat, while inspiring, and on the eye.” None of the volunteers got sick.

Next, Dr. Resenau’s team used cotton swabs to transfer infected “material directly from nose to nose and from throat to throat, using a West tube for the throat culture, so as to get the material not only from the tonsils, but also from the posterior nasopharynx.” None of the 19 volunteers who received the infected swabs got sick.

Dr. Rosenau explains that “[o]ur next experiment consisted in injections of blood. We took five donors, five cases of influenza in the febrile stage, some of them again quite early in the disease. We drew 20 ‘c.c. from the arm vein of each, making a total of 100 c.c, which was mixed and treated with 1 per cent, of sodium citrate. Ten c.c. of the citrated whole blood were injected into each of the ten volunteers. None of them took sick in any way.”

Dr. Rosneau was not done. “Then we collected a lot of mucous material from the upper respiratory tract, and filtered it through Mandler filters. While these filters will hold back the bacteria of ordinary size, they will allow ‘ultramicroscopic’ organisms to pass. This filtrate was injected into ten volunteers, each one receiving 3.5 c.c. subcutaneously, and none of these took sick in any way.”

Dr. Roseneau thought perhaps that influenza was passed by direct human contact. So he had 10 volunteers engage in social contact with persons known to be infected with influenza.

The volunteer was led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat down alongside the bed of the patient. They shook hands, and he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of the five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out.

This they repeated five times, and they did it fairly faithfully in almost all of the instances. After they had done this five times, the patient coughed directly into the face of the volunteer, face to face, five different times.

After the volunteer had had this sort of contact with the patient, talking and chatting and shaking hands with him for five minutes, and receiving his breath five times, and then his cough five times directly in his face, he moved to the next patient whom we had selected, and repeated this, and so on, until this volunteer had had that sort of contact with ten different cases of influenza, in different stages of the disease, mostly fresh cases, none of them more than three days old.

We will remember that each one of the ten volunteers had that sort of intimate contact with each one of the ten different influenza patients. They were watched carefully for seven days—and none of them took sick in any way.

After failing to transmit influenza to any of the volunteers during his many experiments, Dr. Rosenau concluded that he did not know how influenza is contracted –

“As a matter of fact, we entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned any thing, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”


Rights and freedoms have been lost and willingly given away to the state on the basis that a “deadly” pandemic is sweeping across the world due to a contagious new coronavirus. A contagious new coronavirus that only exists in the world of germ theory. But the clue is in the title, it is just a theory, and evidence suggests that it is wrong.

Terrain theory is also just that, a theory. So in truth nobody really knows, all we can do is look at the actual evidence and come to our own conclusions. The problem is the germ theory has been widely accepted as fact and used to commit crimes against humanity and the largest power grab in our life time.

Source 1, Source 2

Share this page to Telegram
4.4 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

79 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Islander
The Islander
22 days ago

Crying shame that this excellent article isn’t broadcast by the BBC-
Some hope!

Skink
Skink
22 days ago

I very much appreciate your valuable articles and wish to make a donation, preferably a yearly subscription. Unfortunately in Australia Optus, Medibank and Energy Australia (all which I use) and more have been hacked and consequently I am not doing any internet financial transactions until I’m better informed of this and or the problem is solved. Thank you for your most valuable information which I have shared, hopefully resulting in more subscribers.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Skink
22 days ago

Those ‘hacks’ that the media call them could be part of a coordinated effort to encourage people to seek more ‘secure’ ways to do financial transactions, like some new face recognition thingo.

But yes, I can imagine you would lose faith in those systems.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
22 days ago

Just wondering why the military spend billions on germ warfare projects ?

Pauline Kinsman
Pauline Kinsman
Reply to  VoicefromEurope
22 days ago

It’s chemical warfare. Just like the “C”. Chemtrails.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  Pauline Kinsman
22 days ago

Chemical gain of function is more fun ?

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Pauline Kinsman
22 days ago

Bingo. It is Chemical warfare as opposed to the popularly named “Biological warfare”.

David A
David A
Reply to  Bob - Enough
20 days ago

Covid was developed through GOF viral research.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  David A
20 days ago

We have to agree to disagree on that one.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  VoicefromEurope
21 days ago

The military are interested in all scientific discoveries –

“Biological weapons, Chemical weapons, Brain machine interfaces … and that’s just the Covid-19 injections”.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/24/bio-weapons-brain-machine-interface-covid-vaccine/

That article has a link to this –

“Dr. James Giordano: The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s

“Dr. James Giordano, Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program and Scholar-in-Residence in the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University, speaks to cadets and faculty about how advancements in neuroscience and neurotechnology will impact the future of war. This event was hosted by the Modern War Institute at West Point.”

Worth taking a look a that video. Giordano is a great speaker.

Pauline Kinsman
Pauline Kinsman
22 days ago

The truth.

A Person
A Person
22 days ago

I wonder if there’s gonna be a swarm of ‘viruses exist’ comments 🙂.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  A Person
22 days ago

Of course viruses exist, but they never leave the computer models.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

I’ve also never understood “the computer models” as well, McAfee keeps popping up and telling me my “Antivirus Protection” expired over three and a half years ago! Is this a scam as well?
BTW-don’t get too excited, it is NOT the Liverpool derby tonight, Liverpool are playing Derby!

John Steeples
John Steeples
22 days ago

Information from John steeples

I’ve heard many people saying when people die is caused by the previous illness but that is totally wrong

What is the real problem is the immune system. If you are bad diet or an illness. The immune system will ball be impaired

But if you are having these injections every injection damage the immune system immune system and damaging it to keep away the common cold.

So you think you keep bringing injections out. The damage is being done by the injection by damaging your immune system people don’t talk of this but the immune system is so important to the body to keep away any disease or to repair itself when you’re sleeping at night. It needs to work properly if you want to live a long time.

Bathsheba
Bathsheba
Reply to  John Steeples
22 days ago

Quite right!

Merv
Merv
Reply to  John Steeples
20 days ago

I am not sure of anything apart from the higher self (Holy Spirit) just at the moment. (regarding immune system)
And don’t EVER underestimate the effects of EMF radiation. According to Barrie Trower and others, mm waves are a weapon. And the fact that the exact same symptoms as ‘flu are caused by RF is no coincidence, I’m sure.
Been waiting so long for the Expose to do such an article as this.
Hallejulah!

Miki
Miki
22 days ago

Ok. So what might be the cause of ordinary flu?

Maiasta
Maiasta
Reply to  Miki
22 days ago

Colds & flus are eliminative crises. Many ‘diseases’ of this type are not significantly different from the Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction, with fevers, chills, and myalgias, etc. The body NEEDS to get sick periodically, in order to better throw off accumulated metabolic waste and exogenous toxins. It’s not surprising that flu occurs as we transition in and out of winter. The body’s metabolism is shifting at these times, preparing for new lighting conditions, and consequently a changing vitamin D levels, and much else besides.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Miki
21 days ago

The Invisible Rainbow has the answer, flu is relatively new, why there was absent in the past or extremely rare? Why you can’t find a book written 200-300 years ago about a flu pandemic or epidemic?

https://www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/English-Summary-of-The-Invisible-Rainbow-A-History-of-Electricity-and-Life-3.pdf

Merv
Merv
Reply to  WhatEver
20 days ago

My thoughts exactly.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Miki
20 days ago

See reply above. EMF?

Miki
Miki
Reply to  Merv
20 days ago

Yes I read it. Electromagnetic pollution is surely one of health deterioration factors.
Still the idea of periodical or on demand autocleansing of body probably needs some more evidence. Maybe there is some evidence of cleansing however I did not find it yet.

Sam
Sam
22 days ago

Sanity returns to The Expose! An intelligently written and thoughtful piece with some excellent references which people should absolutely look up and read.

I just want to add some of my own thoughts as an experienced biomedical scientist who has specialised in “infectious” diseases…

When talking about “germs” it is vitally important to distinguish between the various types of germs (viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites)because they are not all the same.

There is little doubt that bacteria, fungi, and parasites actually do exist as described by scientists. Viruses on the other hand do not exist as described by virologists. They are constructed on computers and exist only in-silico and in some people’s minds. Therefore, viruses cannot possibly make anyone ill or kill them.

Bacteria, fungi, and parasites on the other hand could potentially cause illness and death under the right circumstances. It is important to note that they usually co-exist with humans without causing harm and in fact are usually beneficial to health as the microbiome.

Microbiome research has revealed that there is a type of microbiome associated with chronic disease and a different type associated with good health. The extent to which these real microorganisms “invade and infect” the body rather than arise from the microorganisms that were already there is debatable.

Some people believe that bacteria associated with disease are actually part of the “clean-up crew” responding to toxic damage and are trying to repair damage caused by toxins. I believe this may be feasible in some circumstances but not in other circumstances.

I do take issue with this statement somewhat:

“there are no explanations for the mechanisms by which microorganisms produce the wide variety of symptoms in varying degrees of intensity that are claimed to occur when a person becomes ‘infected’.”

While this is certainly true of supposed viruses it is not true of bacteria. Under certain circumstances (favourable terrain)bacteria can produce harmful toxins that can cause serious damage to cells and tissue that could plausibly explain a wide variety of symptoms. The real question is where do these toxins really come from and exactly why do “friendly bacteria” turn nasty?

I would speculate that these bacteria (and their toxins) are not usually found in humans at all but originate in other species. It is noteworthy than many of the real bioweapon programmes happening in places like Ukraine involve zoonotic bacterial pathogens. Paper trails intended to confuse and misdirect left for people to find about supposed “viral” bioweapons prove nothing.

It is absolutely true that some bacteria, fungi, and parasites can exist in the body in a “dormant” state as spores, cysts, and biofilms. The only question is what exactly wakes them up and turns them nasty?

It is important to be clear about exactly what you mean when using the terms “germ theory” and “terrain theory”. It’s also important to understand that the two theories are not completely mutually exclusive and the truth may lie in certain aspects of both theories being correct.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Sam
22 days ago

Bio weapon or Chemical weapon ?.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

If you are referring to the jabs i would say a bit of both. The lipid nanoparticles seems to be causing most of the damage.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Sam
22 days ago

Yes agreed, allegedly graphene (or graphite) oxide but I have also heard talk of graphene hydroxide.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07419

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp6-bgvlRhg

PS https://www.graphene.manchester.ac.uk/learn/discovery-of-graphene/

Notice how Manchester University is involved in loads of UK and Global government projects now ?

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

Photos of alleged graphene oxide structures have been taken but their chemical composition has not been confirmed yet. I would not be surprised if it turns out to be true though. Yes i remember the Nobel prize going to Manchester for the discovery of graphene.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Sam
22 days ago

Guess where my Dad was a Professor of ? … he was not involved allegedly, but he knows all about it.

Not sure I understand what you mean about the Graphene Oxide structures not being confirmed yet – MAYBE not in the jabs, but they are in engineering.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

What was your dad professor of?

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Sam
21 days ago

It was confirmed.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

This article might be of interest to you: “That mRNA “vaccines” cause cells to produce spike proteins is a fairy tale”Stefano Scoglio, top expert in microbiology and Italy’s most prestigious and best-known critic of the Corona policy, interviewed by Torsten EngelbrechtDidnt share the link as often my links fail the “approval” process.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Sam
22 days ago

Thanks. With the help (guidance and hard stick beating me) with somebody (a women of all things) on a UK Col. forum, we came to that conclusion a year plus ago.

Now whilst I realise that confusion is their second greatest weapon (after fear), where this “science” and “factual information” is concerned, I believe none of it and all of it until it can be proved and conclusively proved to be true or false (i.e. the spike proteins).

God, life used to be so easy.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Bob - Enough
21 days ago

There is no proof for any spike protein and can’t be, it cell debris from the dying cells, you are a ‘factory’ because your cells are dying big time due to the graphene poisoning.

Look for Dr Robert O Young interview with Maria Zeee, the short version was on the SOTN , search box, ‘What happens to the human body and the others around you, when you’re injected with graphene oxide……… (Video)’
He is a prof of blood, he shows it.

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  WhatEver
21 days ago

Do you ever read my comments ?

Again in my response, I stated “Thanks. With the help (guidance and hard stick beating me) with somebody (a women of all things) on a UK Col. forum, we came to that conclusion a year plus ago.”….

In response to Sam’s comment of “This article might be of interest to you: “That mRNA “vaccines” cause cells to produce spike proteins is a fairy tale”Stefano Scoglio, top expert in microbiology and Italy’s most prestigious and best-known critic of the Corona policy, interviewed by Torsten EngelbrechtDidnt share the link as often my links fail the “approval” process.”

We agree – yippee.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Bob - Enough
21 days ago

When I answer it is not only to you. I just carry on the conversation adding my own thought, knowledge for people reading them – it is not personal but because of some reason you tend to take it personal, I don’t know why.

(And yes I have two nick due to ‘awaiting moderation’ messages rather often, the cause can be that I use two computers depending on my location in the house.)

Tigerlily
Tigerlily
Reply to  Bob - Enough
22 days ago

German chemist Andreas Noack made a video last year about graphene hydroxide in the convid jabs, he suddenly died not long after(more than likely bumped off)!

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  Tigerlily
22 days ago

Really, another one ?. Thanks for the info.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Bob - Enough
21 days ago

Yes and probably to DEW attack but there is a glitch, he told graphene hydroxide, La Quinta Columna found graphene oxide and reduced Graphene oxide, Dr Young also.
The glitch is that the body can get rid of graphene oxide with time and with the help of stuff like NAC but according to Novak it can’t from graphene hydroxid.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Sam
21 days ago

We are electrical beings and a ‘sensitive’ system, with the graphene this system is under constant attack. The vaxxed are irradiated from the inside and it would be true even without the nanotech. With the nanotech they became an open target, they can’t hide.

How long you can become healthy while your body acts as a transmitter – receiver causing havoc in your body’ natural electrical processes?

They can be measured from 20m now, if they are in a group, crowd they literally make me sick for days.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  WhatEver
20 days ago

Please read replies above. RF in combination with the properties of GO you have pointed out, are, IMO, a deadly combination.

Piotr Bein
Piotr Bein
Reply to  Sam
22 days ago

Paper trails […] about supposed “viral” bioweapons prove nothing. […] some bacteria, fungi, and parasites can exist in the body in a “dormant” state as spores, cysts, and biofilms. The only question is what exactly wakes them up and turns them nasty?

Also a clue for VoicefromEurope and Pauline Kinsman — see work by Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak in torsion fields applied in medicine, exemplified with a few texts at he bottom of this Expose article:
Without Torsion Fields There Would Be No LifeI will ask Diana if she wished to join the discussion.

Greetings to all Truth seekers. Kudos to the Editorial Team for another great article!

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Sam
21 days ago

Poisonings. For example NSAIDs. They are pleomorphic. Which is another proof for the terrain theory.
And by the way the terrain theory is not a theory anymore, Dr Robert O Young gave proof. Depending on what you eat and what goes into your blood, how the PH changes you produce bacteria and fungi.

The base of Koch’ postulates was monomorphism. The germ theory failed.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Sam
20 days ago

And, for your benefit, I shall repeat. The dangers of EMF cannot be underestimated. RF causes the exact symptoms as the ‘flu. And according to experts (Barrie Trower et-cetera) mm wavelength RF is a WEAPON.
Agree with your expertise on my un-familiar field of medicine. Wholeheartedly.

Sindawe
Sindawe
22 days ago

The author is using the word theory incorrectly, implying that the currently understood process of disease is a hypothesis. THIS is a failing of those who promote Terrain thought. In science the word theory has a specific meaning: a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena. I’ve looked for a while on supporting evidence of Terrain thought, so far all I’ve found are pontific texts that offer no tested results to support the contention here. Rationally I think the truth lies in the middle. A robust immune system with functioning innate and adaptive immune systems is a very good guard against infectious diseased. That’s the Terrain part. Certain microorganism will cause disease when they can evade a person’s immune system. That’s the Germ part. When a person’s immune system has been degraded and is not optimal infectious agents have a much easier time establishing themselves, even those like S. aureus which is commensal with humans most of the time.

Ascientist
Ascientist
Reply to  Sindawe
22 days ago

A correction is in order regarding Hypothesis and Theory. Sindawe is correct there is a misunderstanding, the correct terminolgy to be used is the Germ Hypothesis. I will explain. A hypothesis is a thought experiment (an idea), it precedes theory, so a “scientist” makes a Hypothesis (about why a natural phenomenon occurs) first then conducts experiments to gather evidence to support the hypothesis. If (sufficient) evidence to support the hypothesis is found then the hypothesis becomes a theory. True Science never moves beyond being a Theory as you can never test all (infinite) situations. Also in true science a theory is falsifiable (Karl Popper), everything else is belief. So what we really have is a Germ Hypothesis, because there is not enough evidence to support this becoming a Theory. Indeed in view of the fact that many of the tenets of the Germ Hypothesis have been proven wrong as demonstrated so amply in this article, for example transmission from organism to organism, then the hypothesis should be discarded as patently false according to Popper (you only need find one result where the hypothesis/theory fails). You do not need an alternative hypothesis to exist to discard falsified ones.

The whole of modern allopathic medicine is raddled with experimentally falsified hypotheses (mutations in DNA causing Cancer for another example), however it is a highly lucrative business essentially created by John D Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie in the early 20th century (https://www.corbettreport.com/rockefeller-medicine-video/).

Thank you Expose for publishing this article, yesterday’s Virus’s don’t Exist Psyop article was actually the Psyop itself. I read Igor Chudev’s discussion thread, the Viruses don’t exist participants trashed the Virus believers in short order as expected.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Ascientist
22 days ago

If I read you correctly, what you are in effect saying is a hypothesis is nothing more than an (educated!) guess? And that if there are enough accredited scientists that like the guess, then it becomes an acceptable theory? And in the process of time this theory morphs into ‘fact’ because there is nothing else out there to challenge the theory?
There is a parallel here with what used to be known as the theory of evolution, now widely received as fact-yet it also cannot be proven!

Science falsely so called. 1 Timothy 6:20.

(I am not sure whether you meant riddled as opposed to raddled?)

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  Sindawe
21 days ago

In my opinion there is no such thing as immune system just healthier and less healthy ‘systems’. The antibody science is just as much fraudulent as virology, there are no this or that specific antibodies, there are a few among us with a rare condition, they don’t have antibodies AT ALL, but despite of it they go ill just like everyone else and they recover just like everyone else.
(whale (((.to))), antibody)

GundelP
GundelP
22 days ago

Good to see – finally – an article like this, haven’t found time to read it properly but the fish-tank example is an excellent one to demonstrate the case.

(To the Expose – I don’t know why my nick works or not works – ‘awaiting moderation’, I have an idea – or two – but one of it that I use two different computers due to different locations within the house but probably with the same IP, because of it I shall keep the other one to avoid writing the same stuff again and again, thanks.)

Rhonda
Rhonda
22 days ago

“First RSV Emergency Declared as Pfizer and GSK Race to Get Vaccines Approved” • Children’s Health Defense … “Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer, told The Defender, “It is incredible that the vaccine industry can create a disease — RSV from the polio vaccine — and then create another vaccine to ‘prevent’ that disease. Talk about a business proposition!”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rsv-emergency-vaccine-race-pfizer-gsk/

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Rhonda
22 days ago

‘Pfizer and GSK “moved closer to regulatory approvals” in the past week, and “could each see the first-ever approvals for an RSV vaccine in 2023.” ‘

Options: I could get that injected…

But I think a safer way may be to follow Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s advice: “…but I think anybody who’s listening to this, should never ever ever take another shot of any kind ever again, under any circumstance”.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  A Person
21 days ago

If we don’t kill the virus legend – and yesterday was even late – we’ll have no choice. The camps are ready, we will be force vaxxed and the majority will agree because of fear if they mimic something Marburg-like stuff. Imagine that level if panic and can be done via 5G, also via chemical poisoning. A certain percent of the ‘ebola’ cases was due to formalin (poured into wells).

This is why they can’t let die the virus legend.

trackback
22 days ago

[…] – Germ Theory: The clues in the title, it’s just a theory & has never been definitively proven: […]

GeoffB
GeoffB
22 days ago

This article will please the “viruses do not exist” loons who frequent this site.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GeoffB
22 days ago

Why call people “loons” who don’t agree with you? I would never return the ‘compliment’ to you. I believe in free speech, but I grant you that some do go over the top in their zeal to argue their case.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Perhaps you failed to Notice Sams comment: “Sanity returns to the expose”? Accusing the entire pulcication of lunacy prior to this article. That OK with you was it?

The Islander
The Islander
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

No, I’ll have you know that I didn’t like THAT phrase, it was uncalled for.

Bathsheba
Bathsheba
22 days ago

yes, they’re preaching to the converted; I’ve been a fan of the ‘look after your body and mind’ while avoiding anything manmade approach myself for decades now – since my teens in fact. Excellent article.

danielnagase
danielnagase
22 days ago

there’s a reason why “there’s no such thing as a germ” articles all rely on century old definitions and publications. None of the claims stand up to the past century of research.
1) Toxins do not self replicate. Human bodies do not “detox” themselves to death.
2) Parasites can kill human bodies. Big parasites are multicellular, like tapeworms, small ones are single cellular, like bacteria, and the smallest ones are subcellular, viruses. In fact viruses are the smallest genetically based parasite possible. DNA or RNA in a protective coat to allow it to survive in the environment.
3) Toxins do not self replicate and kill the patient. However, bacteria and viruses can. A healthy immune system is always keeping living things in their place. E.Coli in the gut is ok, in the brain not ok. Every now and then things end up where they are not supposed to be, people get sick and then the immune system takes care of business before anyone dies.
Please stop with this biological ignorance.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  danielnagase
21 days ago

First there is no Covid-19, then there are no viruses, then there are no spike proteins, then there are no germs at all, That gets rid of all microbiology.

It is all a mind game, designed to catch people who prefer simple explanations to complex science and who rightly feel cheated by big pharma but misdirect their ire against science itself rather than against the malfeasance and prostitution of gvovernment and some large corporate scientists.

They will not listen to you. The people behind this want to make expose readers look like flat earthers – I mean if the earth exists that is and if the expose exists that is.

I mean does the expose exist? It is only on a computer somewhere like the virus is said to be, whose exsitence is denied.

SHOW ME THE PROOF that the expose exists outside of a computer. Has it ever been isolated? Really its existence is not a fact is it? It is a hypothesis. An unproven hypothesis. Lets waste a few mont5hs debating that shall we. Anything to stop real journalism that condemns those who made both the virus and the spike protein. And you who comment. How do you know you exist? What proof can you give that existence deniers will not refute?

You might all be bots existing on an MI5 computer. Try to prove that you exist to the hypocrites and when you adduce convincing proof, existence deniers will refuse to accept your proof and keep asking you for actual proof in circumstances where they have decided in advance not to accept any prooof no matter how convicning.

Convincing proof is accepted by sincere scientists but not by activists.

WhatEver
WhatEver
Reply to  danielnagase
21 days ago
  1. Why they should? As long as the toxin in you it carries on causing harm, like the graphene nowadays. They do, you either die to the toxin or try to expel it, where is the proof that the process can’t kill you or the toxin itself during the process? Bacteria produces poisons, too.
  2. Wow, so viruses now has become parasites? What happened with Koch or River’s, monomorphism?
  3. Repetition. When you are poisoned YOU produce bacteria or rather makes them shift because there are just 8 basic types. (Somatid map) With an example they discovered as early as 1987 that in the presence of NSAID bacteria tend to become nasty, causing necrosis. Dr Young proved (and you can watch yourself) how A RED BLOOD CELL TURNS INTO BACTERIA, RECORDED.

Please stop your dogma driven parroting. Science should be based on proof – Dr Robert O Young’ site, scientific articles, go and watch the process of polymorphism.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  WhatEver
21 days ago

WOW red blood cells do not have a nucleus they cannot replicate themselves. They are manufactured in the spleen etc.. Bacteria do have a nucleus. They can replicate. Dr Young has lost the plot. Nuclei do not appear out of thin air..

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

Many cells don’t have including muscle cells. (Dr Lanka’ presentation.)
Watch it, you can see the process with your own eyes, recorded. And this is not only him. Naessen recorded it, too, decades ago with his unique microscope called Somatoscope.

The so called science uses electron-microscope but electron-microscope can’t show you processes in living material, only dead, painted debris.

Naessen’ microscope could show processes in the living blood. Dr Young carried on Naessen’ research.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  WhatEver
21 days ago

Polymorphism ‘map’:

somatides.JPG
trackback
22 days ago

[…] An alternative perspective. […]

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

Herpes Cancer TorpedosI have a social friend who now runs a pharma company (Excalibur) who put a cancer torpedo in a herpes virus and cured cancers in a clinical trial and sold his research vehicle to Amgen for a billion dollars. The drugs resulting from his work have been available since around 2015, I think,

Imlygic. Oncovex. T-VEC
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27516203/ 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27407058/ 

I mean if there was no Herpes simplex virus then he would have no product.

RPE65 Gene TherapyMissing RPE65 gene. Gene Therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis is to add that gene back to one’s DNA by direct injection in a modified adenoassociated virus into the eye (just like Astra Zeneca or Pfizer). The eye keeps that DNA and eyesight improves from almost blind to perfect in most children in a few months.- Unnatural Selection Netflix. – https://medicaltrend.org/2021/04/14/viral-vector-based-therapeutic-drugs-for-genetic-diseases/

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) RPE65 Gene therapy has lasted for 4 years and is still working in treated patients. It was FDA approved in 2018. So it has only had 4 years of application so far. Since it is DNA in a viral vector it will last as long a AZ lasts and vice versa.

It is fantastic to see child recover sight due to using viruses therapeutically.I recommend the Netflix video search for leber or amaurosis.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

Sorry, you have to take the &nbsp: out of the link!

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
“Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false.”

Islander
Islander
Reply to  GundelP
21 days ago

It appears to me that pretty much most of modern medical science, disease and contagion theory is based on a false foundation, so anything subsequently built upon it can only be wrong. I don’t know if you read the quote from Dr Lisa Sanders MD (NY Post 2003)? I can’t remember where I posted it on this site: In her induction into med school with her fellow freshmen, the dean told them all “we know that half of what we teach you here will be wrong, but the only problem is we don’t know which half!”

Stabbing in the dark!

I don’t understand a lot of the ‘science’ that is put forward in defence of the existence of viruses, because I don’t believe it can be understood. Trying to understand it will lead to greater confusion. The same can be said for the false heliocentric theory, try as you may, it cannot be understood because it is 100% false!

diofaszelleme
diofaszelleme
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Then you probably would enjoy Dr Lanka’s presentation, The New Body SOUL Biology. He said, health is harmony. He tried to find and show proof, that a ‘force’, ‘soul’ is behind creation, with truly interesting examples while he proved that the present medicine was built on sand.
I think the truth is that we know almost nothing for sure, we were fed with dogmas and now many woke up and try to find the real reasons behind illness or behind lying about a globe, etc.
There is a driving force in life, I just simply want to know the truth, an interesting path, I somehow left fear behind during this ‘road’.
As far as I see it – sorry for the repetition – the world is created because it simply too perfect to be an evolution caused coincidence. Then there must be a creator behind it, cares or not, doesn’t matter. But I want to know why was so important to them to lie about the earth, behind the obvious as how much they stole from the taxpayer to finance ‘space research’. Was it only about money? I don’t think so. They know something what we can’t because if we will, their power is over.

I slowly run out of nicks, after supporting this rag for months, critics and truth are not tolerated.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  diofaszelleme
21 days ago

Thank you for your reply.
There IS “a Creator” be assured of this veritable fact!
I wouldn’t be so hard on “this rag” as you call it; I ask you, could you do it any better? Think on this!

diofaszelleme
diofaszelleme
Reply to  Islander
20 days ago

Yes. I have a past working for a political party, (the ruling Hungarian) I would do it better if the only goal would be ‘influence’. Also this is why I see trough easily the manipulation attempts.
The only benefit of this platform the relatively free commenting, should be used to spread knowledge, they are very visibly CO.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
20 days ago

Are you going to call Sam a liar again, after Sam pointed out your ties with pharma company? Shame on you. We know who the liar is!

trackback
21 days ago

[…] Germ Theory never definitively proven […]

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

Just like there are no criminals. The terrain of Society is to blame gov! There are no murderers. They do not exist. There is no rape. It never happened. All made up by women. No theft has ever occurred. All made up by insurance fraudsters right? There are no pathogenic people. It is all just a defect in our societies immune system, our police and our courts.

Certainly better police and faster courts would help control the probelm. But to deny the existence of the problem is obviously incorrect. And a sick mind game of the type played by philosphy students.

There are no crminals just bent cops is what terrain theory is saying in human terms.

Terrain theory is the same a decriminalising everything and then there is no crime at all! Nice clean tank. It is what they are doing in Democrat run US cities at the moment. Failing to prosecute violent crime and pretending it does not exist. The result is more violent crime, not a crime free city.

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
21 days ago

Hi woke, go broke.
Just my opinion, man !

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
20 days ago

Sorry, you have lost all creedence after name calling. (liar)
I am sure the Lord shall reward all according to our works.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
21 days ago

FYI – “The covid virus has NEVER been isolated and shown to cause disease… the entire pandemic is based on a fake science myth”      

https://naturalnews.com/2021-10-20-covid-virus-never-isolated-shown-to-cause-disease.html