Breaking News

House of Lords pretend to debate behaviour change strategy that will be used to further climate change agenda

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The body advising the UK Government on climate change has said that 62 per cent of emissions reductions must come from “behaviour change and individual choices”.

In other words, the government must train people to use less energy.  Net Zero will not be reached by using renewables. It’s going to be achieved by reducing our living standards. And that’s the plan.

Read more: UK Government Must Change People’s Behaviour to Reach Net Zero


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


On 12 October, the House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee (“CCC”) published a report entitled ‘In our hands: behaviour change for climate and environmental goals’.  In their opening summary, the committee makes it clear every government department will be required to use psychology as a weapon against the public to ensure we behave in line with what the climate alarmists demand.

Further reading: Covid PsyOps Are Now Being Used for Climate Change

On 3 November, the House of Lords held a debate on ‘Climate Change: Behaviour Change’.  Lord Browne of Ladyton raised the topic: “To ask His Majesty’s Government, further to the advice that they have received from the Climate Change Committee that 62 per cent of emissions reductions involve some form of human behaviour change, what plans they have to introduce a comprehensive behaviour change strategy.”

This is according to a proposed addition to the draft report after the draft had been “considered” by CCC.  There were three amendments proposed, the second was to insert a sentence in paragraph 6:

The amendment was approved en bloc.  However, the final phrase “some degree of change in people’s behaviour” was not added:

Lord Lilley said: “My Lords, may I reassure my noble friend the Minister that the Climate Change Committee does not say that 62% of emissions savings needed for net zero must come from changing behaviour? That would require Stone Age lifestyles. The 62% figure includes savings from carbon capture and storage, and other technologies. In fact, my noble friend Lord Deben’s excellent committee sensibly says that 90% of carbon savings will come from new technologies and just 10% from modest lifestyle changes.”

Lord Lilley was one of the 11 CCC members who were present when the second amendment was approved en bloc. He was the only one who disapproved of the amendments.

And his reference to “savings from carbon capture” is curious as the report only mentions “carbon capture” three times.  Once in a table showing the top 20 actions that would deliver the largest emissions reductions and “require some consumer engagement,” a second time in the glossary and the third time in the paragraph below.

11. Moreover, 10 per cent is not even a minimum. The CCC emphasise that its ‘Balanced Pathway’ to net zero is not the only one conceivable – “there are multiple ways to meet the net zero 2050 target”. So, despite witness claims that life-style changes are “essential”, alternatives involving, for example, more Carbon Capture and Storage could in theory entirely obviate the need to adopt more frugal lifestyles. However, such alternative pathways would probably be significantly more expensive and therefore impact living standards negatively through even higher taxes and costs.

In our hands: behaviour change for climate and environmental goals, 12 October 2022, pg.133

The above paragraph is an extract from amendments Lord Lilley proposed and were rejected.  His proposal was an alternative to the three that were adopted.  The second of which is mentioned above in this article. Could Lord Deben’s “excellent committee” be pulling the wool over his eyes?

Baroness Parminter doesn’t seem to view herself as a consumer but her comment does indicate how far they are planning to go in removing our liberties, and this is just the beginning.  She said: “While the Minister cites the energy-saving website, I challenge him to produce any other examples from this Government of trying to give consumers the advice that they need about heating their homes, as the noble Lord, Lord Deben, said, and about the food they eat and buy and how they travel.  During the pandemic, which was a successful example of behaviour change, we saw the importance of sustained, clear communication with the public.”

Although no one in the House of Lords thought to question the ethics of or what behavioural change tactics might be deployed to coerce the public to make “emissions savings,” the CCC report makes some recommendations:

Information is not enough to change behaviour; the Government needs to play a stronger role in shaping the environment in which the public acts, through appropriately sequenced measures including regulation, taxation and development of infrastructure. [emphasis our own]

In our hands: behaviour change for climate and environmental goals, 12 October 2022, Key Messages, pg.5

And then, during the House of Lords debate, the topic that the globalist oligarchs and their henchmen link more and more openly with the climate change/net zero agenda was raised – population control. Lord Anderson of Swansea, a Welsh Labour peer, enquired about ways to encourage the reduction of population growth, not just in the UK but in the world.  He asked:

“My Lords, one of the effects of climate change will be a moderation in the pace of the population increase of the world, which leads to desertification, deforestation and increased migration. How can we encourage that?”

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Some Shmuck
Some Shmuck
1 month ago

Based on government behaviour from the last couple of years I predict grass-up-your-neighbour, restrictions to travel, access to services based on compliance and common or garden social pariah treatment

VoicefromEurope
VoicefromEurope
1 month ago

Behavioural change should start with teaching the population to stop exhaling CO2….

Gerald
Gerald
Reply to  VoicefromEurope
1 month ago

Can you explain how? Unless of course you’re suggesting everyone should commit suicide. Why don’t you go first and set the example.

Lynda H
Lynda H
Reply to  Gerald
1 month ago

I’m pretty sure VoicefromEurope’s comment was satirical, though unfortunately the Eugenicists are committed to stopping the majority of the world population from breathing.

Gerald
Gerald
Reply to  Lynda H
1 month ago

Maybe my reply was satirical.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
1 month ago

Seems all our Politicians are bought and paid for.
Climate change is caused by Sun spots, nothing more nothing less.
There is nothing we can do about the sun.
The changes have been happening for thousands of years, only noticed since records began.
We pay these fools too much. It’s about time they had proper jobs.

John Steeples
John Steeples
1 month ago

It really is too late to stop climate change. You see it already around the world. How many floods there is about today?

Earlier in the Philippines this fires and 1 million fires every year

They cut trees down all over the world. Where do we get our oxygen from

As big boats all over the world throw out black smoke which goes to the ozone layer, Makes the world warmer and gets to the icecap and it melts the ice goes into the sea and that’s what changes the weather.

Got millions of spray cans to go to the ozone layer, the environment is being used your never stop it or change it now catastrophe will happen one day. I don’t know when.

mark evans
mark evans
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
1 month ago

Also, you will find, that the huge companies that heavily promote this agenda, also have huge shares in oil companies.
I am convinced most of this is about, forcing the oil prices high, in order to maximise profits, of the slowly dwindling oil supply.
On a video on YT the other day, a chap asked a simple question, if all this infrastructure needs to be working by 2030, where are the panicked workers, desperately trying to get all this in place, 7 years is not long at all.
He did conclude that this was an impossible task, and our leaders must know this, as stupid as they all are

bluearea
bluearea
1 month ago

As Jesse Ventura put out a video on climate change, he states follow the money as he and many others know it’s a money lie scam