Breaking News

Doctors in USA admit they killed Patients during the Pandemic by putting them on Ventilators

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A jaw-dropping article published by The Wall Street Journal in December 2020 has resurfaced.  In it, American physicians admitted to ventilating patients who did not need it as a step in their protocol.  It was done not as a treatment that was likely to benefit the patient, but rather as a fruitless and callous way of attempting to stop the spread of covid-19.

Doctors are treating a new flood of critically ill coronavirus patients with treatments from before the pandemic, to keep more patients alive and send them home sooner.

Before the pandemic, between about 30% to more than 40% of ventilator patients died, according to research … As the pandemic grew, hospitals in the US reported death rates in some cases of about 50% for ventilated covid-19 patients.

Hospitals Retreat from Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics, The Wall Street Journal, 20 December 2020

Add to the fact that up to 50 per cent of covid-19 “cases” were just “PCR positive” false positives, wrote James Lyons-Weiler. “Euthanising humans is illegal. Especially for the benefit of other patients.”


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Did Protocolists Euthanise Covid-19 Patients with Ventilators and Sedatives “To Save Other Patients”, >50% kill rate? Up to 70% of covid-19 Deaths Due to Ventilators

By James Lyons-Weiler

TRIGGER ALERT: If you lost a loved one to covid-19 and the doctors tried to ventilate your loved one early, please do not read any further. Have someone close to you read this, read the full article, and describe the article to you in a calm, quiet setting. You will need a friend to help you through this.

If you are a doctor who has been persecuted for doing the right thing, perhaps you lost your license or it is being threatened, send this Wall Street Journal article to your lawyers – and thank you for not acquiescing to the demands that you kill patients on ventilators and with strong sedatives.

Either way, I encourage PR readers to read the WSJ article yourself and see if you agree or disagree.

WSJ Article: McCullough, Kory, Lyons-Weiler, and Others Were Right

In a jaw-dropping article published by The Wall Street Journal – ‘Hospitals Retreat From Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics – physicians admit to ventilating patients who did not need it as a step in their protocol – get this – not as a treatment that was likely to benefit the patient, but rather as a fruitless and callous way of attempting to stop the spread of covid-19.

Last spring, with less known about the disease, doctors often pre-emptively put patients on ventilators or gave powerful sedatives largely abandoned in recent years. The aim was to save the seriously ill and protect hospital staff from Covid-19.

Now hospital treatment for the most critically ill looks more like it did before the pandemic. Doctors hold off longer before placing patients on ventilators. Patients get less powerful sedatives, with doctors checking more frequently to see if they can halt the drugs entirely and dialling back how much air ventilators push into patients’ lungs with each breath.

“We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the patient’s benefit, but to control the epidemic and to save other patients,” Dr. Iwashyna said “That felt awful.”

Yes, euthanising humans is illegal. Especially for the benefit of other patients. It should feel awful.

Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators partly to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread when protective masks and gowns were in short supply. Doctors could have employed other kinds of breathing support devices that don’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested patients using them could spray dangerous amounts of virus into the air, said Theodore Iwashyna, a critical-care physician at University of Michigan and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Ann Arbor, Mich.

Subsequent research found the alternative devices to ventilators, such as delivering oxygen through nasal tubes, weren’t as risky to caretakers as believed. Doctors also gained experience with covid-19 patients, learning to spot signs of who might suddenly turn seriously ill, some said.

The WSJ article describes a study conducted that now allows doctors to predict who needs a ventilator and who does not:

It found more doctors now follow the pre-pandemic protocols, which have reduced the number of deaths and shortened the time patients spend on ventilators, HCA’s chief medical officer said.

Before the pandemic, between about 30% to more than 40% of ventilator patients died, according to research. Numbers were sharply higher in the pandemic’s early hot spot in Wuhan, China. As the pandemic grew, hospitals in the US reported death rates in some cases of about 50% for ventilated covid-19 patients.

(25.6 – 7.6)/25.6 = 70% of Covid-19 Deaths Due to Ventilators? Up to 50% Who Died in Hospital Did Not Have covid-19?

One study of three New York City hospitals found the death rate for all covid-19 patients dropped to 7.6% from 25.6% between March and August after accounting for younger, healthier patients in the summer. Hospitals in New York were less crowded in August than during the April surge, which could increase mortality, the study’s authors wrote in October in the Journal of Hospital Medicine. The study also suggests patients may have benefited from new medications and improved treatment, they said.

Add to the fact that up to 50 per cent of covid-19 “cases” were just “PCR positive” false positives. This means under protocolists’ “care,” perhaps as many as 50% of people who died with a PCR positive test result died because of a false positive PCR test. They either never had covid-19, or they became infected in the hospital after going home for ten days with a respiratory ailment other than covid-19 that, if tended to properly with outpatient care, would never have led to hospitalisation.

Perverse Incentives to Ventilate Patients

In a remarkable rarity of “fact-checking” gone right during the heyday of covid-19 disinformation, USA Today actually verified Dr. Scott Jensen’s reports that hospitals were receiving financial incentives that he considered “gaming the system,” citing numerous independent so-called fact-checker opinion websites.

“We rate the claim that hospitals get paid more if patients are listed as covid-19 and on ventilators as TRUE,” they reported in April 2020.

“Hospitals and doctors do get paid more for Medicare patients diagnosed with covid-19 or if it’s considered presumed (sic) they have covid-19 absent a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if the patients are placed on a ventilator to cover the cost of care and loss of business resulting from a shift in focus to treat covid-19 cases.”

It’s REAL Early Treatment, Stupid

We were right. So many of us were right. Protocolists should have listened.

Further reading: Who Are the World’s Leading Authorities in covid-19 Treatment? James Lyons-Weiler, 27 September 2021

Immeasurably Callous: Now That the Vaccinated Are Being Hospitalised Far More, “Guidelines are just guidelines”

From the WSJ article“Researchers and doctors continue to study covid-19 patients who require ventilators, and some experts have called for flexibility from pre-pandemic standards for doctors to decide how to calibrate ventilators. ‘It’s personalisation, that’s the key word,’ said John Marini, a professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota. ‘Guidelines are just guidelines’.”

Anyone paying attention to the Public Health takeover of allopathy understands the reality that guidelines are only guidelines until someone in HHS or the White House decides to shut you down on personalised medicine.

We need harsh, hard investigations with consequences – and activists need to write bills tying the hands of protocolists to prevent them from ever again killing one patient to hypothetically save another – under threat of a murder charge.

We need legislation for “on-demand” scripts for off-label medicines that patients want for potentially deadly infections – regardless of “FDA Approval” – FDA does not, by definition, have to “approve” off-label scripts.

Also: there are helmet-based ventilator options – that are far less invasive, patients do not feel they are being attacked or strangled – and they come with free training.

About the Author

James Lyons-Weiler is a research scientist and author of ‘Cures vs. Profits’, ‘Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism’, and  ‘Ebola: An Evolving Story’.  He regularly publishes articles on a Substack page titled ‘Popular Rationalism’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Augustus
Augustus
5 days ago

The hospitals were also pumping these patients full of remdesivir to hasten their deaths. I wonder if this is still used to treat the “covid” patients today? The hospitals have become killing fields.

chrisirish67
chrisirish67
Reply to  Augustus
4 days ago

hospitals always were killing fields.

trackback
5 days ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Kayla Wildman
Kayla Wildman
5 days ago

Ironically, the “Chinese Guidance” on COVID-19, published in fluent English on Mar 4 2020 and available on the web, recommended a treatment protocol that – if used in U.S. hospitals – would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives. The Chinese protocol almost eliminated the use of ventilators and specified lung-protective ventilator settings, and getting patients off vents early for lung rehab.

Barney
Barney
5 days ago

These murders rise to the level of crimes against humanity and they MUST be prosecuted. Everyone, from the top all the way down to the nurses must be charged. Do prosecutions for murder stop, once the numbers of people killed goes beyond a certain point? Which law is that? Never knew such a law existed. BECAUSE IT DOESN’T. Treatment for covid was already available in the form of Ivermectin. The media slagged and slandered it using the derogatory terms, “horse paste” and “horse dewormer” while never mentioning the FACT that Ivermectin had won the NOBEL PRIZE FOR MEDICINE!! That deliberate omission implicates most of the media as criminal conspirators in these crimes against humanity and they too must be prosecuted, just as Goebbels was in World War 2. To be technically correct, Goebbels killed himself, his wife, AND his 6 little children in order to avoid prosecution, the louse.

Augustus
Augustus
Reply to  Barney
5 days ago

I still purchase my ivermectin from a farm and ranch store. I don’t mind the horse paste one bit. No script needed.

johnny
johnny
5 days ago

I remember the first Brave Dr who raised the alarm bells about the Ventilator catastrophe was Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell MD. He stated to put videos out on the internet way back in 2020 describing what what really going on. The moved him out of the way to a different department. he was so nervous & frightened by sharing the information. he is still on twitter & you might get his early videos still online. It was a Catastrophic Time

RJ O'Guillory
RJ O'Guillory
5 days ago

….here is where they start admitting to what they did, but start pouring out crap reasons and excuses to cover their asses. They knew they were killing people. They knew they were getting up to $500,000 for each person they put on Remdemisivir and ventilators. They are just worried now that the people will be coming after them…and so they are building their excuse base. We need charges for crimes against humanity, trials and legal executions.

~ Occams
~ Occams
4 days ago

Thay HAD to ‘stop the spread’! Everyone was ‘testing positive’ for something that didn’t exist using a DNA replication tool as a diagnostic tool.

Which is what GAVE them their pandemic.

I just LOVE how the lies go on and on and on and on and on and on and………..

Dan
Dan
4 days ago

This is sick, they killed Toots Hibbert this way, medical murder.

trackback
4 days ago

[…] Read More: Doctors in USA admit they killed Patients during the Pandemic by putting them on Ventila… […]

PJ London
PJ London
4 days ago

Anyone who could read and had half a brain knew from day 2 what was going on.
The doctors were told, “This is the protocol; intubate and give a massive muscle relaxant (which would stop the diaphragm of any elderly/at risk patients). If you follow protocol we will give you an extra $10,000 if you don’t we will take away your licence.”
Just the Government reducing costs and getting rid of those expensive, old, useless eaters.

chrisirish67
chrisirish67
4 days ago

complete nonsense. hospitals have very few ventilators. no one gets put on a ventilator for colds or flu. want to kill a person, put them on continuous high levels of oxygen.

Dan Phillips
Dan Phillips
4 days ago

I remember that time. They argued that they couldn’t put covid patients with respiratory problems on just oxygen because the patient could still spread the virus. Instead, the patient needed to be murdered by plugging them into a ventilator, which is a closed system and would stop the spread of the virus. That was justified because the virus was extremely dangerous, which was plain to see in the death rate of people hospitalized for covid.