Breaking News

Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Legislation being proposed in Montana, USA, would ban people who had been injected with a covid “vaccine” from donating blood or organs. The bill would also ban people who have high-count spike proteins from “long covid.”

Proponents said the bill was about medical autonomy and the right to receive blood from donors that had not been vaccinated against covid. Other supporters of the bill said that blood recipients should not have to worry about adverse effects in an emergency.

Representative Greg Kmetz, the sponsor of the bill, said he’s spoken with constituents who said they didn’t want “vaccinated blood making a patient’s health situation even worse.”

In addition to creating a severe shortage of blood in the state, opponents of the bill said there’s no way to test blood for both long covid or the “vaccines.”


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Formally introduced in the Montana State Legislature on 17 February, House Bill No. 645 proposes a misdemeanour offence with a fine of up to US$500 for anyone who knowingly donates or uses blood or organs containing isolates introduced by mRNA or DNA pharmaceutical biotechnologies or high-count spike proteins from long covid-19:

Section 1. (1) A person may not knowingly donate whole blood, plasma, blood products, blood derivatives, human tissue, organs, or bones containing gene-altering proteins, nanoparticles, high-count spike proteins from long covid-19, or other isolates introduced by mRNA or DNA vaccines, mRNA or DNA chemotherapies, or other novel mRNA or DNA pharmaceutical biotechnologies.

(2) A person may not knowingly use, receive, accept, ship, transfer, or administer whole blood, plasma, blood products, blood derivatives, human tissue, organs, or bones containing gene-altering proteins, nanoparticles, high-count spike proteins from long covid-19, or other isolates introduced by mRNA or DNA vaccines, mRNA or DNA chemotherapies, or other novel mRNA or DNA pharmaceutical biotechnologies.

House Bill No. 645, Introduced by G. Kmetz

Section 3 of the bill states, providing a person has not been found guilty of violating Section 1, a blood bank or tissue bank may not be held liable for any injuries resulting from blood transfusions or organ transplants as long as:

  • the blood products or tissue products have been tested by the latest testing procedures and are found not to be dangerous to the health of the recipient; and,
  • the blood products or tissue products have been screened and tested for and are found not to contain gene-altering proteins, nanoparticles, high-count spike proteins from long covid-19, or other isolates introduced by mRNA or DNA vaccines, mRNA or DNA chemotherapies, or other novel mRNA or DNA pharmaceutical biotechnologies.

Those opposing the bill slightly outnumbered its supporters, the Daily Montanan reported. Opponents included the Montana Nurses Association, the Montana Hospital Association, the Montana Medical Association and the Montana Primary Care Association.

Chief Medical Officer for the American Red Cross in the Western US Dr. Walter Kelley said this bill would “decimate” blood supply in Montana as 80% of the state has received at least one dose of the vaccine.

Cliff Numark, senior vice president of blood collection non-profit Vitalant, said there’s no way to test for the components outlined in the bill, including gene-altering proteins, nanoparticles, high-count spike proteins from long covid-19, and other DNA chemotherapies, among other covid-19 related restrictions.  “There’s no test to do that, so we would not be able to comply to determine whether people have received it or not,” he said.

We are told the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was encoded in the “vaccines.” And the vaccine mRNA instructs vaccinees’ bodies to manufacture the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We are also told that covid tests detect specific genetic material and were adjusted to test for genetic material specific to different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

On its website, the CDC states: “A Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, or NAAT, is a type of viral diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes covid-19. NAATs detect genetic material (nucleic acids).  NAATs for SARS-CoV-2 specifically identify the RNA (ribonucleic acid) sequences that comprise the genetic material of the virus.”

The Cleveland Clinic claims the PCR test is “the gold standard test for diagnosing covid-19 … It’s accurate and reliable … It tests for the presence of the actual virus’s genetic material or its fragments as it breaks down … The test could also detect fragments of the virus even after you are no longer infected.”

Covid tests, they say, are so accurate and reliable that since the beginning of the “pandemic,” a positive test is a “case.” And the number of “cases” have been used to justify ruining lives and livelihoods by shutting down economies, closing schools and removing our inalienable rights and freedoms.  Yet Numark says there’s no test to detect spike protein and other genetic material in donors – presumably because, bizarrely, NAATs and PCR tests are only accurate and reliable in detecting “cases.”

Sources for this article include:

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
chuckycheese
chuckycheese
1 year ago

Now that’s smart! Let everyone receive unvaccinated blood when needed, but not vaccinated!

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
1 year ago

Being unvaxxed I would never now donate blood unless I am able to be guaranteed to receive unvaxxed blood in a transfusion.

Ditto all body parts.

Anne finley
Anne finley
Reply to  Mark Deacon
1 year ago

After the HELL they put us through?! I’m charging for my blood and they all deserve to pay! Remember when we were almost going to be banned from medical treatment and left for dead because we didn’t vaxx?

Susan
Susan
1 year ago

PCR tests are NOT accurate! Many false positives that caused people to get locked up in isolation to find out they were negative when retested!! I am a nurse at a prison, I warned the inmates NOT to get the jabs, many didn’t listen. Found out that many dangerous lots when to red states, just like many of those disaster “accidents”

LRS
LRS
Reply to  Susan
1 year ago

PCR test is a fraud, the result means nothing. On the other hand it is a delivery tool. No other sane explanation why you had to stick it into your nose till your brain and screw / rub it.

We should end testing because otherwise they will demand it again and again at every next imaginary virus caused pandemics. to implement who knows what.

Same disgusting game they do with the TB tests for cows. Skin test, absolutely not reliable, but they block farmers to sell the milk for half a year or so on the suspicion or they even kill the animal(s) just how they did with Geronimo (the pet alpaca).

It is vital that the Terrain Theory would be known by everyone. TB – just like other bacterial diseases was the disease of poverty, lack of food, nutrition, vitamins.

As about farms… we buy only raw milk products, imagine the scenario that yesterday the cow was not yet tested but (they say) get TB, you drank the milk, it is over and today the skin test shows that the cow has TB. What a BS!

Annette
Annette
1 year ago

My daughter has a genetic disorder that requires her to get regular blood transfusions. (She has received well over 100 units of blood since Jan 2021.) Our family is UN-v (and I am positive that my daughter has received blood from MANY vaccinated donors), but I do NOT support this legislation. Blood banks have barely had the amount of blood they needed to get by, since March 2020. The majority of current donors are senior citizens, who have a much higher rate of being up-to-date on their Vs. If blood banks were to not accept their donation, the blood supply in this country would be cut in 1/2.

LRS
LRS
Reply to  Annette
1 year ago

You are right, it must be the choice of the person who needs that blood. They just should keep the two types separately. I know I wouldn’t accept vaxxed blood, not even if it would mean I have to die. But again, it has to be a personal choice.

Till some level we are lucky I guess, we are unvaxxed and have the same blood type and RH factor, we could be donors to each other if needed.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] – Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood […]

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
1 year ago

Donate?

My blood costs $100,000 per Litre and Pfizer can pay for it.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Read more: Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood. […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] zdroj: https://expose-news.com/2023/03/04/legislation-bans-vaccinated-from-donating-blood/?fbclid=IwAR3PcKI… […]

Lois Price
Lois Price
1 year ago

Ni one should be taking thus poisonous shit

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood, Rhoda Wilson, March… […]

Curtis
Curtis
1 year ago

Bill is dead.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Proposed legislation in Montana would ban vaccinated people from donating blood, Rhoda Wilson, March… […]