Breaking News

Meet the world’s largest landowners topped by the British royal family

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The British Royal Family, headed by newly crowned King Charles III, owns 6.6 billion acres of land worldwide. That’s more than 37 times as much as the global runner-up, the Catholic Church. Most of the top 25 largest private landowners are Australian cattle farms, but they’re outdone by the Inuit of Canada.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The following are excerpts from the article ‘What do King Charles III, the Pope, and Canadian Inuit have in common?’ written by Frank Jacobs and published by Big Think.

A new report by Madison Trust lists the world’s largest private landowners. 

The Australian Agricultural Company (“AA Co”), Australia’s oldest and largest farming conglomerate which is beef focused, manages 17.3 million acres, which is about 1% of Australia’s entire land mass.  AA Co, the 7th-largest private landowner in the world, is now majority-owned by UK billionaire Joe Lewis, who grew his stake in the company to more than 50% in September 2022. Lewis, who is the 39th-richest person in Britain, is also the majority owner of soccer club Tottenham Hotspur.

Lewis can’t claim to own the world’s largest farm, however. That distinction goes to the Mudanjiang City Mega Farm in northwestern China, close to the Russian border. Its 22.2 million acres mean it’s slightly bigger than Maine, and almost as big as Austria.

Still, Lewis is not the largest private landowner in Australia. That prize goes to mining magnate Gina Rinehart, who owns large chunks of both her own country and the US. Rinehart is Australia’s wealthiest person, and in 2012 was the world’s richest woman (now merely the 9th richest, with a net worth of $23.5 billion). In all, she owns just under 24 million acres of land. That’s a larger area than Indiana or Portugal.

Still, that’s a far cry from the lands held collectively by the Inuit People of Nunavut, Canada’s largest and northernmost territory. In the 1990s, the Canadian government granted large parts of the territory to the locals via the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement of 1993. This amounted to 87.5 million acres (about 136,720 sq mi, or 354,000 sq km), which is about halfway between the sizes of New Mexico and Montana, or roughly one Germany. That makes them the third-largest private landowners in the world.

Another Inuit area ranks number five globally. This is land held collectively by the Native people in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR) in the northern parts of Yukon and the Northwest Territories. At 22.5 million acres, those lands are slightly bigger than that Chinese mega-farm.

The Catholic Church is not just the largest single religious denomination on Earth, but also the second-largest private landowner in the world, thanks to the numerous churches, convents, abbeys, schools, and other types of real estate it owns all across the map. Estimates are that the church owns about 177 million acres of land globally.  That’s bigger than Texas, and twice the size of Germany.

Yet even that is small beer compared to the world’s largest private landowner, the holdings of which are more than 37 times larger than those of the Catholic Church. This is the British royal family, headed by King Charles III. The Windsors own more than 6.6 billion acres around the world. That’s more than three times the size of Brazil. It constitutes more than one-sixth of the planet’s land area.

The question of the Royal Family’s ownership is a bit abstract. As sovereign of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and several other countries in the Commonwealth (including Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, to name the biggest ones), King Charles “technically” has ownership of the realms over which he rules, either entirely or in part. For example, about 89% of Canada is “crown land.”  This is however considered public land, distinct from the monarch’s private estate. Considering the percentages, there is bound to be some overlap between the Canadian territories counted as “owned” by King Charles, and those under the control of the Inuit.

There is, however, also something called the Crown Estate, a real estate portfolio in the UK that is theoretically owned by the British monarch, but not part of his private estate. Neither is it government property. The Crown Estate covers properties from the charmingly arcane to the blandly commercial:

  • Approximately 55% of the UK’s foreshore (beaches), but not in the Orkney and Shetland islands.
  • Virtually all of the UK’s territorial seabed (from mean low water to the 12-nautical-mile limit).
  • 241 commercial, residential, and office properties in central London, including the Apple store on Regent Street.
  • Full ownership of a shopping centre in Worcester, and a 50% stake in shopping centres in Oxford and Exeter. Plus, more than a dozen other retail and shopping venues.

Additionally, via the Duchy of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall, the Royal Family has direct control over vast real estate holdings (and their incomes) throughout rural England and Wales, but also (via the Duchy of Lancaster) over the prestigious Savoy Hotel in London.

Even if King Charles might not actually own one-sixth of the planet’s dry land, with Buckingham Palace in central London and Windsor Castle just outside, plus various other residences throughout the entire United Kingdom, he does have plenty of choice about where to lay his hat at the end of the day.

Read the full article HERE.

Featured image: The World’s Largest Landowners infographic – 1. The British Royal Family, 2. Catholic Church

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
10 months ago

It would be very nice if we were assured this is in our best interests?

epsaux
epsaux
Reply to  Brin Jenkins
10 months ago

Don’t worry, if you learn enough about the world you’ll become indifferent to the fate & well-being of the human race.

Tony Ryan
Tony Ryan
10 months ago

I own a Landcruiser, a trailer, a boat, and a Stratorcaster Fender but I am also homeless. So I’m sorter rich and poor. But I am happier than those rich dudes.

186no
186no
Reply to  Tony Ryan
10 months ago

“I know my place – I own a Fender Stratocaster, trailer tent but no boat; I look up to you”

Anonymous
Anonymous
10 months ago

Australia is Crown lands and the pastoralists are leaseholders usually .It’s 90% desert or semi arid hellhole unfit for dogs or dingoes.

john
john
10 months ago

I strongly suggest people take note of what the Windsors and Spencers are involved in. Including Prince William and Harry. These are criminals of the highest order with ties to the most disgusting of all trades.
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=171960

john
john
10 months ago

For clarity, he is Emperor Charles III. NOT King Charles III.
He was crowned with the Imperial Crown, which is an office of Rome and ties to the Chair of the Estates. The same role his mother, Empress Elizabeth adopted. Neither wore the crown of St. Edward. This family are global criminals pure and simple. Imposters to England and pirates on the Land. They are despicable and vile with their own human trafficking organisations. And people revere this scum?

vicki
vicki
Reply to  john
10 months ago

I though the crown of St. Edward, was melted down by Cromwell, which is why the Crown Jewels date from Charles II

john
john
Reply to  vicki
10 months ago

The National Crown of England is a crown of thorns, a poor, scabrous thing made of iron alloy, clothed in tattered gilt, devoid of jewels or pearls. It nonetheless sits on a velvet pillow in the Royal Vaults, a symbol of the good Common People — Subjects, as in those “subjected” to the lash and thorns and actual sacrifice. The Christian Crown of St. Edward similarly is in disrepair but made of gold and decorated with jewels, a bit worm-eaten and time-worn, but still viable. It hasn’t been worn for any serious purpose in generations. And finally, we have the Imperial Crown of Rome, which the late Queen wore as she sat on The Chair of the Estates, serving as the Pope’s Overseer of the Commonwealth, also known as “Territorial” properties. The use of an Imperial Crown reappeared after a lapse of some centuries on the head of Napoleon Bonaparte. And then, mysteriously, on the head of Wilhelm II, King of Prussia. One must surmise that its appearance on the head of Elizabeth II marks the end of British hegemony. The parasite moves on. We have definitive proof presented as the High Court case of YAH v Regina, in which the Court determined that Elizabeth II pulled a Bait and Switch Fraud on the British People, rendering her entire Coronation a farce and her kissing of the Bible an act of fraud. The public face of the dutiful Christian Monarch devoted to the good of humanity and the welfare of the people was a fraudulent misrepresentation and the Coronation itself was an “Act” as in a theater act. The contract with the British People affirmed by the Coronation was overturned within three days, as if the late Queen suffered Buyer’s Remorse. She spent the rest of her life as a shill working for and under the Imperial Crown, walking ten paces behind the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London, obliged to worship at the Crown Temple and required to embrace its dreadful religion. In exchange, Elizabeth II had the wealth and splendor of the world, the same deal Satan offered Yeshuah in the Wilderness. Elizabeth II, like her progenitors, failed the test, took the bait, and served the wrong crown. Any contract between the late Queen and the British population was thus severed and no action she took, no decree or declaration she issued, no debt she accrued and no Law she approved can be charged against them; all the rules, regulations, codes, and charges against their credit that she and her administration made, stand rebutted and returned for service and for cause. This same fraud scheme, a Bait (Christian Monarch) and Switch (Pagan Monarch) Fraud has been routinely carried out by every British Monarch since George III, rendering all their actions and contracts seeming to obligate the British people null and void for deliberate fraud, duplicity, impersonation, and misrepresentation of authority. While this Great Fraud only glancingly affects our government because the only service contract we have with these Blighters is an explicit written Sea Jurisdiction contract establishing the Law of the Land for sailors (and pirates), The Crown Fraud affects all the people who live in the British Isles and in the former Commonwealth, and also affects all the businesses and incorporated entities that have relied on Acts of Parliament since 1763. The British Crown Corporation and its franchises stand void for fraudulent construction and unlawful activities such as the same misrepresented and undisclosed registration of “live births” we have described taking place on our shores, the same theft and infringement of private copyrights on Given Names, the same profane practices of deceit, fraud, misrepresentation, unlawful conversion, identity theft, false trusteeships, creation of phony constructive trusts both public and private, and resulting False Claims in Commerce, together with the exercise of coercive powers under color of law by Municipal Corporations and their Personnel — all of which have also been applied to the General Public throughout the sphere of British influence worldwide.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  john
10 months ago

Hi john,
Your comments sound well researched, what do you suggest to get our power back.
Tried taking out pieces of paper, had Special Branch knocking at the door.
Tried contacting my MP Ed Miliband, never had a reply yet.

186no
186no
10 months ago

Any reason why the State of Russia does not figure in this?

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Islander
Islander
10 months ago

None of us down here own anything, we think we do.

The earth is the LORD’s, and the fulness thereof; The world and they that dwell therein. Psalm 24:1.

For what shall a man be profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Matthew 16:26.

It’ll be too late then!

bob
bob
10 months ago

Love listening to Rhonda…

:Stuart-james.
:Stuart-james.
10 months ago

It’s only possible to own if one never dies. These loonies never cease to amuse me.

Gw Wells
Gw Wells
10 months ago

land needs to be divided up and put in more hands

first
first
10 months ago

There is no british royal family. They’re just more hook nosed creeps. If you want to be free you need to remove all the money and land and power from your oppressors. Anything else is just a waste of time. Who cares who “owns” the land if you can’t do anything about it due to “laws” and “contracts” and “statute” and all the other BS that makes you spend your entire life, from birth to death, following the rut that they made for you, chasing after peanuts to feed their greed.

186no
186no
Reply to  first
10 months ago

And who will do the “safekeeping ” of the money land and power formerly “ in their hands” ? Any guarantee that history does not repeat itself with the new safekeepers and is it possible they will just that bit more equal then …. the rest of us?

UltraZero
UltraZero
10 months ago

Blackrock to Take former comedian
Zelenskyy’s Panhandling Act to the Next Level

https://kurtnimmo.substack.com/p/blackrock-to-take-zelenskyys-panhandling

BlackRock Submits Bid to Buy Ukraine (For the good of the Ukrainians)

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2023/01/09/blackrock-submits-bid-to-buy-ukraine/

trackback
10 months ago

[…] – Meet the world’s largest landowners topped by the British royal family […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Read More: Meet the world’s largest landowners topped by the British royal family […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News: […]

Pam
Pam
10 months ago

Kevin Cahill exposed this in his excellent book Who Owns the World: The Surprising Truth about Every Piece of Land on the Planet. He links poverty to the state of being landless. There is he calculated, enough habitable land on the planet for all people to subsist.