Breaking News

The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths following EMA approval of Covid Vaccine proves it is 100% Safe & Effective

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In the scorching summer of 2021, a momentous decision swept across Europe, sparking a whirlwind of emotions among parents, who had fallen for the 24/7 propaganda, eagerly awaiting a ray of hope for their children.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) had finally granted emergency use approval for the use of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 12 to 15.

Relief and elation surged through the hearts of countless naive parents who saw this as a beacon of protection against the alleged pandemic.

Yet, the winds of fortune took an unexpected turn as the vaccine rollout for children commenced. Startling reports emerged, revealing a distressing surge in excess deaths among the young ones across the continent. The sense of optimism quickly faded among the thousands of families affected and was replaced by a grim reality that cast a shadow over the hopes of many.

Tragically, the statistics paint a haunting picture, with a staggering 63,060% surge in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 by the twenty-second week of 2023. These numbers whisper a chilling tale of consequences that were foreseen by many silenced and heavily censored voices.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Back in 2020, as the establishment desperately sought to fast track the use of mrna technology disguised as a vaccine against the alleged pandemic, COVID-19 injections were still in the embryonic stages of development, treading a precarious path toward regulatory approval.

To hasten their availability, regulatory agencies like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) invoked emergency use authorizations (EUAs), granting a temporary lifeline to these novel and dangerous vaccines.

These EUAs acted as regulatory mechanisms, permitting the usage of medical products in dire circumstances, such as a pandemic, even before they completed the rigorous journey of full regulatory approval.

It was an unprecedented measure taken in the face of an unprecedented crisis. But the alleged Covid-19 pandemic had proven to not be a threat to children, making future decisions by these regulatory bodies extremely questionable and possibly criminal.

One crucial reason why mRNA vaccines had not been widely employed in the general population until December 2020 was the specter of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

This phenomenon haunted the corridors of scientific discourse, raising concerns that vaccination with mRNA vaccines could potentially exacerbate the disease, rendering those inoculated more susceptible to its clutches.

History had already witnessed a chilling episode of ADE during the development of a dengue fever vaccine. Initial trials indicated promise, displaying protection against the virus for those unscathed by prior infections.

Sadly, in individuals who had encountered a different strain of the virus before, the vaccine seemed to amplify the risk of severe illness, a grim testament to the treacherous nature of ADE.

Similar tales emerged from numerous animal studies, where potential “vaccines” instigated lung inflammation and other adverse effects upon subsequent exposure to the virus. The vaccine-induced immune response, rather than neutralizing the virus, wrought havoc on lung tissue, leaving a trail of unintended consequences.

Additionally, the ominous specter of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) loomed large during respiratory virus vaccine trials, including those against coronaviruses.

For instance, trials for a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine illuminated a disconcerting pattern: vaccinated infants faced an increased risk of hospitalization and more severe respiratory illness upon encountering the virus.

The immune response triggered by the vaccine, rather than safeguarding against the virus, seemed to trigger an overreaction of the immune system, exacerbating the disease’s symptoms.

Respiratory viruses, such as coronaviruses and RSV, had long been recognized as grave threats to vulnerable populations, especially infants and the elderly.

However, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus, supposedly responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, appeared to spare the younger generation, raising perplexing questions about the extension of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Covid-19 vaccinations to children.

The absence of an imminent threat to children further muddled the decision-making process.

The ultimate goal couldn’t have been containment, as real-world data revealed an ironic twist: the Covid-19 vaccinated population seemed to exhibit a higher likelihood of infection and transmission compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. The very shield intended to protect against the virus appeared to falter in its mission.

The eye-opening chart, encompassing the period from January 3rd to March 27th, 2022, unveiled the total number of Covid-19 cases categorized by vaccination status and age group in England. The data, extracted from the the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Week 5, (page 43), Week 9 (page 41) and Week 13 (page 41) Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance reports , painted a vivid picture of the disconcerting reality.

Click to enlarge

Similarly, another revealing chart illuminated the case rates per 100,000 people, again segregated by vaccination status and age group in England. The alarming disparity emerged: case rates soared among the triple-vaccinated population in every age group, leaving a gaping chasm between them and the unvaccinated.

The divide only grew wider as time passed.

Click to enlarge

The numbers spoke volumes, revealing that the Covid-19 vaccine recipients faced a higher risk of infection compared to the unvaccinated populace. The evidence begged for a closer examination.

But that examination has still not happened, and sadly, in a recent analysis, EuroMOMO, an organization entrusted with official statistical data from European countries, published data that revealed a disheartening correlation between the approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children and a surge in excess deaths among the young ones.

The data, collected from 26 participating countries across Europe (not including Ukraine) paints a grim picture that simply cannot be ignored.

The chilling figures, extending up to the 22nd week of 2023, will most definitely capture the attention of concerned minds.

It is also worth noting that the data only covers 26 out of the 44 countries in Europe, excluding Ukraine. Meaning any claims attributing the findings to the ongoing war can be dismissed immediately.

During week 21 of 2021, the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, first to children aged 12 to 15 and later to the age group of 5 to 11.

However, the weeks following the approval witnessed a shocking rise in excess deaths among children, an upward trend that persisted unabated.

Between week 22 of 2021 and week 52 of 2021, an alarming tally of 919 excess deaths among 0 to 14-year-old children should have sent shockwaves through the continent. But the data was suppressed.

The contrast couldn’t have been starker, as the period between week 1 and week 21 of 2021 saw 218 fewer deaths than expected.

And the fact the surge in excess deaths aligns perfectly with the EMA’s approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 cannot be merely dismissed as coincidence.

The distressing trend continued throughout 2022, with a total of 1,639 excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across the 26 European countries, painting a grim reality that cannot be dismissed.

Sadly, as week 22 of 2023 arrived, the haunting truth emerged—590 more excess deaths, the heart-wrenching total of 3,148 deaths among children were recorded.

The somber figures spoke of an unprecedented 63,060% surge in excess deaths since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Covid-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.

The contrast with the previous period couldn’t be starker.

From week 21 of 2019 to week 21 of 2021, 5 fewer deaths occurred among children aged 0 to 14 than expected.

Week 21 to 52 of 2019 (Pre-“Pandemic”)
Source

The entirety of 2020 witnessed a notable decline of 230 fewer deaths than expected, painting a chilling narrative.

Meanwhile the year 2021 up to week 21 prior to emergency use authorisation of the Covid-19 injection for children across Europe witnessed 218 fewer deaths than expected.

The staggering increase in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 26 European countries, including the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany, paints a bleak picture of an astounding 63,060% surge since the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.

This distressing reality raises serious concerns, considering the experimental nature of the injections and its previous avoidance due to the risks of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED).

Moreover, administering the vaccine to children, who were not at significant risk from the alleged Covid-19 virus, seems perplexing in light of the 230 fewer deaths recorded among children aged 0 to 14 across Europe in 2020, from the onset of the alleged pandemic to the year’s end.

Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jo Jo
Jo Jo
9 months ago

I have zero empathy for these willfully uninformed parents although I feel terrible for their unsuspecting children. There has been so many health professionals screaming about how unsafe these injections are yet people are so brainwashed that they hear the word vaccine and assume it’s safe and effective. They play russian roulet with their childrens lives and then when the child gets sick or dies they’ll blame anything other than the injection. It’s an IQ test so ultimately the powers that be have eliminated the protege of the dumbest of the dumb.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
9 months ago

They were brainwashed. Blame the government and the media for pumping out all that propaganda, and they aren’t going to stop.

The big cover up – “Defending the jabs: Prepare for the most massive medical gaslighting in world history”

From that article – “I’ve long said the powers-that-be went into this knowing that their bioweapon jabs would eventually be blamed for what they’ve been causing for so long. They’re working just as intended, slowly but steadily causing more and more health issues in their recipients. But news of James’ [Bronny James]] cardiac arrest came too soon for the powers-that-be and their timetables. They don’t want the truth to come out just yet.

My hypothesis has been that they would reveal the dangers of the jabs shortly after the Republican National Convention. Big Pharma and the CDC will come out and acknowledge the adverse reactions are greater than they had allegedly anticipated. Then, they will blame Operation Warp Speed and Trump for wanting to get a vaccine out before the 2020 election. They will say they were rushed and couldn’t do the proper testing. They’ll say they didn’t want to release the bioweapon, but Trump forced their hand.”

https://pandemic.news/2023-07-26-prepare-for-the-most-massive-medical-gaslighting.html

Augustus
Augustus
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
9 months ago

Yes, the government. The parents are also to blame tho. Many parents researched this toxin, as there was plenty of information available that wasn’t censored. These parents refused to subject their children to unproven science and even pulled their kids from schools that mandated these injections. Herd mentality took over instead of sound logic and reason.

Sienna Hardwick
Sienna Hardwick
Reply to  Augustus
9 months ago

I work an online job from home and earn 200 dollars per hour. I never imagined I could do it, but my best friend, who makes 18,000 American Bucks a month at the job, encouraged me to find vs02 out more about it. This has limitless possibilities.
.
.
Now Here——>>> https://Dailyearn13.blogspot.Com

Lookout
Lookout
9 months ago

Like the Israelites of old, these silly uninformed women followed the dictates of an obvious deceiver, Dr Death Fauci and sacrificed their children to his god Moloch. I hope they got whatever they wished for from this sacrifice.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
9 months ago

Related –
Japan’s ageing population drops by a record 800,000 in one year amid declining birthratehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12341125/Japans-ageing-population-drops-record-800-000-one-year-amid-declining-birthrate.html

I wonder what cover up bluff they will come up with to explain the drop – anything but vaccines.

Anonymous
Anonymous
9 months ago

Rhe firstvthing i learbed ftom school was that people are dumb and teachers are totally controlled by a “secret society “really .

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  Anonymous
9 months ago

“Rhe firstvthing i learbed” – are you drunk or just stupid? We can all can make the odd typing error, but if you can’t do better than this, then don’t bother posting.

trackback
9 months ago

[…] The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths following EMA approval of Covid V… […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] Source The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths following EMA approval of Covid V… […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] Read More: The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] Read More: The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths […]

Alex
Alex
9 months ago

This is an informative report EXCEPT that talk of a PERCENTAGE increase in EXCESS deaths is nonsensical unless a comparison is being made between the positive excess deaths over one period and a higher positive excess death figure after during a subsequent period, which is not being done here. The baseline for excess deaths is ZERO (0), so any increase on that is an INFINITE multiple of it.

Calculating a percentage increase from a NEGATIVE figure, as seems to have been attempted here, is even more misleading. It looks like your reporter plugged the numbers into a formula to get the 63,060% result:

(3148 – (–5)) / –5) * 100 = 63060

This is NOT a valid use of a percentage-increase formula! All numbers used in such a formula need to be POSITIVE!

Please don’t destroy your credibility by using such misleading, sensationalist figures! If you want to talk about an increase in deaths, as in rage of death, use absolute figures, not excess figures. If you stated what the death RATE for the age groups in question for periods before and after the injections stated to be administered and compared them—calculating a percentage difference if you like—your report would be damning enough and have the advantage of being CORRECT.

Alex
Alex
Reply to  Alex
9 months ago

Corrected version:

This is an informative report EXCEPT that talk of a PERCENTAGE increase in EXCESS deaths is nonsensical unless a comparison is being made between the positive excess deaths over one period and a higher positive excess death figure during a subsequent period, which is not being done here. The baseline for excess deaths is ZERO (0), so any increase on that is an INFINITE multiple of it.

Calculating a percentage increase from a NEGATIVE figure, as seems to have been attempted here, is even more misleading. It looks like your reporter plugged the numbers into a formula to get the 63,060% result:

(3148 – (–5)) / –5) * 100 = 63060

This is NOT a valid use of a percentage-increase formula! The number used as denominator (and subtracted in the numerator) in such a formula needs to be POSITIVE!

Please don’t destroy your credibility by using such misleading, sensationalist figures! If you want to talk about an increase in deaths, as in rate of death, use absolute figures, not excess figures. If you stated what the death RATE for the age groups in question for periods before and after the injections started to be administered and compared them—calculating a percentage difference if you like—your report would be damning enough and have the advantage of being CORRECT.

Alex
Alex
Reply to  Alex
9 months ago

Actually there’s still an error in my comment, an arithmetic error. The result of plugging those numbers into the formula is NEGATIVE, further discrediting its being reported as positive.

(3148 – (–5)) / –5) * 100 = –63060

And the headline read

“The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths…”,

Contrary to the claim of “…an unprecedented 63,060% surge in EXCESS deaths…” (my emphasis). Very misleading. False in fact. Poor form. Please, for everyone’s sake, lift your game!

Alex
Alex
Reply to  Alex
9 months ago

On yet further reflection, what the figure of –63,060% (minus 63,060 per cent) indicates is a 63,060% DECREASE in excess SURVIVAL.

trackback
9 months ago

[…] – The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths following EMA approval of Covid Vacci… […]

drewtho
drewtho
9 months ago

….high crimes perpetrated with malice aforethought. Evil murdering bastards.