Breaking News

The Babylon Conspiracy viewed from two angles

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Two perspectives of the Babylonian conspiracy detail how ancient mystical religions practised by a few from ancient bloodlines have ruled and influenced history and still do today.

With over 30 years of research, Gary Wayne links the bloodlines of today’s Royal families to “men of renown” in history and pre-history, including Nimrod, the first tyrant post-flood and founder of the first world empire at Babel, Babylon.  In his book,  Wayne argues that the descendants of these “men of renown” plan to enslave humanity, as they had done before Noah’s flood.  

Matthew Ehret links the Babylonians to Henry Kissinger’s 2012 prophecy that “in 10 years, there will be no more Israel.” Ehret argues that Kissinger was the “midwife to New Babylon.”

The two sources complement rather than contradict each other, the major difference being the two men approach the same subject matter from different angles.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The Bloodlines of the Nephilim

Gary Wayne authored the two-part series of books ‘The Genesis 6 Conspiracy’.  The first is titled ‘How Secret Societies and the Descendants of Giants Plan to Enslave Mankind’ and the second is ‘How Understanding Prehistory and Giants Helps Define End-Time Prophecy’.

In the first book, Wayne argues that there are giants among us, passing largely unnoticed, intent on carrying out a secret plan to enslave all humanity. They may not look like giants today, but their bloodlines extend back to the Nephilim – the offspring of angels who mated with human women – described in Genesis 6 when giants roamed the land. Wayne details the role of modern-day Nephilim in Satan’s plan to install the anti-Christ at the End of Days.

Not everyone agrees that Nephilim or the giants are the offspring of fallen angels.  For example, in a 2019 video, Dr. Peter Gentry argued that although the angels had sexual relations with humans, the Nephilim already existed before this occurred.

In the video below, Wayne briefly describes a few theories about the origin of the Nephilim and then gives an overview of the history of these bloodlines up to modern times, beginning with Genesis 6:4 which states: “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days and afterward, when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were heroes of old, men of renown.”

Before the flood, during Noah’s time, the mystical religions that were forced on the world by the Nephilim were essentially Sun worship and a pantheon of gods.  Wayne asserts that Enoch’s library of 36,525 books hidden away in 9 vaults survived the flood.

There are two Enochs in pre-history, Wayne said.  The Enoch that created the library is the descendent of Cain and not the descendent of Seth.  Enoch’s books contained the seven sacred sciences and illicit knowledge which came from the fallen angels to the descendants of Cain.  The fallen angels were the angels who “went into the daughters of men,”  Cain’s descendants. This knowledge developed into all the major arts and sciences that we know of today, Wayne said.  To secret that knowledge, they created a mystical religion.

The Nephilim, whether they somehow survived the flood or were re-created after the flood, once again usurped all of the main kingships after the flood.  One of them was Nimrod, who attempted the first post-flood rebellion against God at Babel.

It is widely considered that Shinar, where the Bible says the Babel event took place, was a territory in south Mesopotamia; and that Babel was located at Babylon, the capital of BabyloniaAccording to Answers Research Journal, although the actual site of the Tower of Babel has not been found, it is believed to be most likely located in North Syria.

Using text’s from Enoch’s library, Nimrod re-introduced the pre-flood mystical religion, forced people to follow it, and developed the seven sacred sciences to rebel against God, Wayne said.  But God stepped in and confused them by creating multiple languages so that human rebellion against God wouldn’t happen again until the ordained time. “We will see another rebellion against God, just as it occurred before the flood and at Babel,” Wayne said.

These Nephilim bloodlines exist today, Wayne said. “They exist today in the Royal families. Most of the Royal families [ ] have genealogies to prove it, at least that’s what they say … They have the ability to take those genealogies all the way back into pre-history and all the way back to the giants [Nephilim].”

“What these bloodlines are designed to do, and have been designed to do all throughout history, is to be kept pure to introduce the anti-Christ,” he added.

He makes a case in the book that the anti-Christ in the End Times will be from the bloodline, or at least they will present him as a descendant of the bloodline, of Nephilim. 

There’s a marker in their genome which they call the gene of Isis.  In their belief system, that’s how the word Genesis came about.  “In the end time, they’re going to collect all the people who have the gene of Isis and those are the people who are going to rule the next world, not the average humankind,” Wayne said.  “So, they have no real need for humankind.”

What are the descendants of Nephilim doing today?  We have embedded the video below to begin at timestamp 52:03 where Wayne answers this question.

Now You See TV: Genesis 6 Conspiracy: Nephilim (Giants) Plan to enslave Mankind/ Book of Enoch, 11 November 2015 (77mins)

To a large extent, the video above compliments a recent essay written by Matthew Ehret. Covering similar subject matters to Wayne and giving details from a different angle, Ehret’s essay describes how Henry Kissinger’s 2012 prophecy that “in 10 years, there will be no more Israel” is linked to mystical Babylon.

As his essay is more than most would read in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles.  The following is the introduction to Ehret’s essay.  You can read his full essay HERE.

Sir Henry Kissinger: Midwife to New Babylon

By Matthew Ehret

The moment Kissinger’s last breath left his corpse, media commentators lost no time running out the gates, either singing songs of slavish praise about the “great liberal statesman” on one hand or composing devastating critiques of the bloodstained trail of tears Kissinger’s legacy left on the world.

I was beginning to think that nothing new or relevant could be said about the life of Sir Kissinger (he was made a Knight of the Order of St. Michael and St. George in 1995). But with the smell of Messianic fanaticism weighing heavily in the air of Jerusalem these days, I realised I was quite mistaken. In 2012, Kissinger said something quite curious that very few people have taken seriously, yet his statement opens the door to an important lesson about world history—and Kissinger’s peculiar life gives us a window into it.

Speaking on Israel’s future in 2012, Kissinger sent shockwaves of confusion through the world when he said, “in 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”

Why would Kissinger, a man who devoted such a major part of his life to the cause of Zionism, believe with certainty that Israel would no longer exist in 10 years? What was supposed to happen under a Hillary Clinton regime that would have resulted in Kissinger’s prediction unfolding in 2022?

Did Kissinger not want the Middle East stability he so often spoke so highly of?

His apparent dual support for Zionist empowerment on one hand and his belief in the impending destruction of Israel on the other is not a glitch in the matrix nor a contradiction in Sir Kissinger’s thinking. Rather, it represents two sides of one bloody program that ultimately involves purging the Holy Land of both Jews and Arabs.

Since Kissinger’s 2012 opinion provided such an important, ironic crack in the machinery of oligarchism, I’d like to take a moment to invite you to join me as we peek through this crack into a story that may take us as far back as Babylon…

Part 2 in our series is the section of Ehret’s essay titled ‘“Greater Israel” as a British Imperial Project’.

About the Author

Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the ‘Canadian Patriot Review’, a Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, and Director of ‘The Rising Tide Foundation’. He has authored three volumes of the ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series and four volumes of the ‘Clash of the Two Americas’. He hosts ‘Connecting the Dots’ on TNT Radio, ‘Breaking History’ on Badlands Media, and ‘The Great Game’ on Rogue News.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
87 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

Why do men value ideologies finding their security in handed down superstitious illusions which corrupt any clear view of life and divide us all making peace between the human race an impossibility? Why have ideas and beliefs become more important than life itself? It’s not only these ancient religious beliefs which are insane, it’s ALL religious beliefs. Don’t react immediately, consider what I have to say. Is belief in a religion evidence of leading a religious life? Is it really all so easy to bring religious quality to life through professing the words ‘I believe’? Or is religion more in the area of transforming a man’s life out of the corruption of societal conditioning and into the life of meeting the truth of life and death as they actually are? All mainstream religious organisations talk incessantly of love, yet despite this, this is nothing other than a loveless world. The Catholic Church, the world’s largest ‘religion’ owns its own bank and billions in real estate, in a world where a child dies every five seconds from starvation. Is this an organisation bringing the religious qualities of love, peace and harmony into the lives of mankind? Are the lives of those who profess to understand religion exemplary of what they preach? Are these religious authorities in any way worth listening to or following? They also divide us as people, the Babylon Conspiracy is an obvious example of the levels of potential psychotic insanity which can be wrought on humanity through the valuing of a traditional belief system. But all belief systems are of the same nature. They colour our view of life. They divide people, the Jew, the Christian, the Muslim, the Hindi, over 4,200 of such ‘religions’ are in existence today. Through the continuity of tradition and a terrible education which conformed our lives to memory and following an authority in every area of life in an eternal act of competition against the lives of all others, (which is a subtle form of violence), we have all been brainwashed into becoming cogs in a giant divisive machine of continuity of past traditions guaranteeing we will never know peace in this world nor relationship or love in our lives. In the area of religion no less than every other. Surely, this world is as it is because we live divided lives. And those divisions are in our consciousness, painting different colours onto our world which would otherwise be the same world for each one of us, were we not so divisively ideologically engaged. Humanity will never live at peace in this world until we can live together and we can never live together when we insist on finding security in psychological divisions of religious belief, sense of patriotism, allegiance to a nation, attachment to numerical wealth, societal status, political ideology or any other division. It is the functioning pattern of human consciousness within us all of divisive learned identity which is tearing this world to pieces. The revolution our world needs to meet is within us all, it is not in the external world, which is merely a reflection of the divisive nature of the inner lives we have been programmed to lead.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

Hi oneworldpeoplesforum,
So did you agree with Gary Wayne or not.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  Dave Owen
4 months ago

Hi Dave, I prefer not to agree or disagree, I am not keen on conclusions, seems plausible though. Ultimately, true or false, I see that human consciousness itself is the root of the problem. If he is correct, this is only an external manifestation of divisive human thought, which is what we all act upon. We divide because thinking is driving our lives and thought is knowledge stored as memory, which is divisive between us and never complete. (Always more to know). Thought is also incessant and automatic. Thought arises from our sense of identity, seeking security in continuity, educated into us and gathered in memory from past experiences. It’s our complete lack of understanding of what is leading our lives (thought) which is dividing our lives and destroying our lives. If there is hope for humanity it need be sought in this area, in the understanding of what we are. This is the change our world needs to meet. A revolution in human consciousness which changes the way we act. (Divisively). We need find a way to stop the madness at the helm today, but it’s kind of ubiquitous to the entire human race. A matter of who does most damage, based on their stolen resources. Making sense of the world and our lives through thinking divides us because our thinking is all divided and isolated, were we able to look (if even possible) from a position free of contamination to ideological identification we would come into immediate relationship with life as it is, the same for every man. It’s one world, it’s us who look at it through billions of divided concepts and its thought which is doing the dividing.

Miles Patterson
Miles Patterson
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

I think the division you highlight is correct however I think it’s true root is the knowledge of good and evil dating back to God’s instruction to the two He formed from the dust off the ground.
They were presented with two options, the knowledge of good and evil, or life.
Regrettably they chose the former and lost access to life eternal.
We are offered the same choice today. Spend our lives dividing between our knowledge of what we consider to be good and evil or uniting with life eternal.
Jesus declared I am the way, the truth, and the life and He proved it. He is not religion, religion killed him. He is the Son of God who raised him from the dead and gave him power to raise us and give us life eternal if we choose that life.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  Miles Patterson
4 months ago

Withth utmost respect Miles, you repeat a story told. An old story, now with us for thousands of years. Was Jesus the ony son of God? Are we all not children of the same? That he was raised from the dead no one can say with any sincerity, no one was there. We accept what we are told to accept, we accept the authority of others, who have profited from that authority for an eternity. Is eternal life a matter of choice? Is it really all so simple? You highlight an interesting biblical story, that of the Garden of Eden and the eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Knowledge is thought. Thought arises in us from our past education, (including religious) and past experiences. Thought arises from memory, which is knowledge in action. This is what divides us as no man shares the same past. We act from thought and so our actions are inherrently divisive and what divides us comes to conflict. Now, are you not in your protestation here (and certainty of it), acting from a base of knowledge of good and evil? You are stating positively the case of what is the good. Which is knowledge. Educated into you by another, this is nothing you have found out for yourself to be true and so this is second hand information. In your insistince that Jesus is the only son of God, and that you only need choose the derected path laid out by another to grant eternal life, you are professing the very knowledge of good and evil so warned against holding. Isn’t this an intersting paradox? Again, with respect, your words are reflective of tradition, of handed down knowledge of right and wrong, of the very thing the biblical parable warned us as being, the very barrier to eternal life.

SilencedAbi
SilencedAbi
Reply to  Dave Owen
4 months ago

Hi Dave,

Legends after legends and another legend, these days there are tons of them. But proof? How anyone can tell that this book is true and that one is not?

I agree with oneworldpeoplesforum.
I always saw religions as a tool of mass control and deception.

There is one aspect of life I can’t cope with. Assuming a benevolent, creative mind – God – why we have to eat each other? While I understand the perfect, clever design of recycling of the system called earth I don’t why there are so much suffering. Just think about it, think about when an animal hunts another animal tearing it apart and eating while the victim is still alive. That’s the normal. Even plants have feelings.

We have (or had before mass vaccinations) perfect bodies with the skill of self-healing. But how this fits to the cruelty and pain we have to experience because of wars, tyrants, or just to stay alive – emotions, strong emotions, nowadays mainly low vibration emotions. Fear, pain, anger, etc. We are ‘machines’ to produce emotions, animals also, even plants are.

Monroe, no matter how much I think about it, only Monroe’s explanation – that little horrid novel about Loosh – makes sense.
In the novel Loosh is a from of energy needed for other (invisible) creatures. One of them of these creatures came up with the idea of ‘gardening’ Loosh and collecting it instead of finding it in its natural form. Strong emotions generate it, you generate the most when you die, but after that you won’t, so your fast death is not a good option for constant production – was just a quick summary.

There is another thing, in my native language evil called ördög, Őr Dög – translation: Guardian Beast.
Is it possible that Monroe was right? Is it possible that we are here to be harvested on us and all of the cruelty and madness we experience these days is for producing more Loosh and collecting it in a more efficient (the nanotech vax) way?
Is it possible that there are no 2 sides but only one?

If it sounds madness, someone please explain to me that such a genius creator (God) why created all of the sufferings, the need to hunt and each other? Why?
Why the controllers (like H. Clinton) tried to break the firmament, why they tried to break out? What did they know that dared to risk it? Why the controllers wanted to break out from the ‘garden of Loosh’?

READ it. whale (dot) to slash c slash loosh pdf

Htos1av
Htos1av
Reply to  SilencedAbi
4 months ago

So, you’re saying billary is a ‘good guy”? LOOOOOOOLLL!!!

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Dave Owen
4 months ago

Certain oneworldpeoplesforum is yet another sock puppet persona Dave, like the Johns etc. They mess up when posting so their comments have different coloured icons sometimes, which means they’re using different email accounts.

Their main aim seems to be spamming comment threads, to drown out comments which might be worth reading.

john
john
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

I wonder if you might find a Robert Sepehr of interest He is an author and anthropoloigst with no religious axe to grind,but seems to come up with a lot of historical facts that would support this view in many ways.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

Interesting that someone is leaving negative responses to two posts here so far rather critical of traditional religion, my own and one further down the page, adequately exemplifying I would say, that carrying such beliefs colours a mans perception and divides us all. Further, it makes questioning and investigation into the matter an impossibility. We seem to be finding security in what divides us all and so denying the security we think we have found.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

And now the negative responses disappear. Where’s the faith?

Shelie
Shelie
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

Your screen name is a conspiracy in itself. “One world people” under the one world government and religion being set up right now. Don’t worry, the “peace makers” will make sure we are all one. One global conscious controlled by the “pure doctrine of Lucifer”.. Good luck with all that lets be one and at peace in a very evil world where those with all the global assets, and military might hate you. Look at you and me like we are a virus eating up all of their resources… They are the division you seek to make peace with.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Shelie
4 months ago

I don’t believe in “luck” nevertheless, well said.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  Shelie
4 months ago

Don’t make the mistake of thinking words are what lies behind them Shelie. Words are only symbols, with no real meaning in themselves.

oneworldpeoplesforum
oneworldpeoplesforum
Reply to  Shelie
4 months ago

One other thing Shelie, you say this: ‘lets be one and at peace in a very evil world’ – has there ever been anything other than this?Are you aware that in the past 5,000 years of recorded history, there have been 15,000 recorded wars? “one world people”, unknown to you refers to a website I ran for a while in response to the Great Reset. Its still online, but I have not contributed to it for a while due to severe ill health caused by vaccine shedding. Now, had you known that, you might not have stated what you did, but you didnt and you did. We are fast to react based on the protection of our own conclusions. And this is the nature of all knowledge, it goes hand in hand with monumental ignorance, because what you can know is a fraction of what there is to know, in every field. Of course there needs be one view of the world, that view is the view of the world as it is, uncorupted by any colouring of it through learned unquestioned isolated divisive iseologies, founded on divisive knowledge which traditional religion is. I do appreciate if you find your security in such divisive living which has repettively brought humanity to conflict over countelss millenia (and still does) this is a difficult thing to face. Does not make it any less true however. And to the people who are leaving negative responses to my post below regarding the word is only a symbol, I can only respond with a sinking heart as to the level of insanity we are all steeped within today, so certain of what we ‘know’. You really think the word ‘door’ is the door? No offence meant.

Katherine Hine
Katherine Hine
Reply to  Shelie
4 months ago

Well said, Shelie. “Unity” is what the evil ones WANT. God wants the separation of the wheat from the tares and this seems to be the time, or at last one of the times, in which He is allowing the evil ones to implement the plan He had all along.

Abigail22
Abigail22
Reply to  Katherine Hine
4 months ago

I admire how he separates the wheat from the tares in a case of innocent children, babies or animals. When 5G finished thousands of birds in seconds but some survived, can you please highlight how the separation happened? It is not true that animals have no souls, it’s a convenient view to feel and think less burdened when we eat them because we have to. Same with plants. There were many experiments singing to a plant or speaking to it with result. Maybe it’s about the consciousness of water (Veda Austin, Masaru Emoto) present in all of us.
The ancient (pagan?) religions knew this. They hunted down an animal and said sorry. (The beginning of The Last of the Mohicans.) I would never be able to accept Christianity or any other ‘man-made’ religion nor their planned one world satan based religion but they are stronger because they are united in ‘sin’ and they are just about to winning above us because of their unity.
What about uniting in/with a respect towards every living thing?

You can see conspiracy in a nickname, you have a point that it’s not the best nick nowadays but the comments of him/her are good, sorry.

They can rule us because they divide us! Make no mistake, I see Icke’s ONEessness just as much as a trap.
We don’t need a common religion, what we need is to respect each others’ as long as it is not about killing/enslaving others based on beliefs.

It doesn’t matter who do you pray to, the action, praying matters. I still don’t understand it fully, but as long as you pray with the innocence of a child it’s usually ‘heard’. Maybe we really do shape our futures based on beliefs.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Abigail22
4 months ago

Augustus Toplady (1740-78), fine Christian minister and hymn writer believed that animals have a soul/spirit based on Ecclesiastes 3:21: “Who knoweth the spirit of man whether it goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast whether it goeth downward to the earth?”

As for me, it is enough to know that God in Christ is “upholding ALL things by the word of His power.” Hebrews 1:3.

SilencedAbi
SilencedAbi
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

They sure have.

I think in certain circumstances we work like antennas?

Islander
Islander
Reply to  SilencedAbi
4 months ago

Well, certainly, we do communicate!

But, the grand question is-do we believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the salvation of our eternal souls?

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  oneworldpeoplesforum
4 months ago

Can’t be bothered reading through the rest of the gibberish but the final part of your closing sentence caught my attention. Sure you’ll have much to say on ChatGPT’s analysis of Sam Harris’s attempt to convince people free will doesn’t exist, back in 2012:

https://billdembski.com/artificial-intelligence/using-chatgpt-to-refute-atheists/

David Yates
David Yates
4 months ago

I am UK independent author and publisher David Albert Yates. I have been capturing everything to do with chemtrails, vaccines, the scamdemic and much more and publishing everything in monthly paperbacks via lulu.com for cost. I have used many many Expose articles and credited everything used. Over 22 titles so far. Shop the Independent Bookstore | Lulu

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  David Yates
4 months ago

Hi David Yates,
Thank you for your comment.
Saw a lot of Chemtrails over Yorkshire UK, Saturday 23 Dec.
They must have done some Chemtrailing during the night, to the West.
They blotted out the Sun, the wind they created was blowing the chemclouds over us.
It’s now Sunday the wind is building up.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Dave Owen
4 months ago

Ditto here Dave, the wind is only just dying down now here. Not opened any windows or balcony doors today.

We loathe using the central heating unless it’s pretty Arctic, preferring to layer clothing including fingerless gloves, hats etc when necessary. The temperature in the flat has remained around 19/19.5 C throughout the day.

And yep, great article pick Rhoda, printed and saved Matt’s full article to pdf from his Canadian Patriot site.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Dave Owen
4 months ago

Ditto here Dave, the wind is only just dying down now here. Not opened any windows or balcony doors today.

We loathe using the central heating unless it’s pretty Arctic, preferring to layer clothing including fingerless gloves, hats etc when necessary. The temperature in the flat has remained around 19/19.5 C throughout the day.

And yep, great article pick Rhoda, printed and saved Matt’s full article to pdf from his Canadian Patriot site.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Please delete my comment awaiting approval Rhoda, posted it in the wrong browser, sorry.

john
john
4 months ago

comment image

Abigail22
Abigail22
Reply to  john
4 months ago

666 again? Does it work satanists? 🙂

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
4 months ago

Hi Rhoda,
You have a brilliant article here.
Gary Wayne has done a good job putting the picture together.
What he says about Christians being rubbed out of History is happening.
It’s easy just to call the controllers, Aliens, who hide behind the curtain.
We have to learn from History.

rohjo
rohjo
4 months ago

If you believe Jesus was the only son of God and not a son of God, you call yourself Christian and are prone to suffer serious paranoia about world mental patterns that have been in place for millennia and reappear in various versions. The Chosen People syndrome serves the priestcraft of every religion. Meanwhile, greed and power take form in the usual organized ways.

The Vedas were oral transmissions from insights into noumena that began at least four thousand years ago. From the Vedic perspective, Eastern mystics say the Universal Mind (Brahm, Jehovah, Allah) is the Power that rules time, space and illusion, and jealously tries to guard its governance of this prison from the intervention of Providence in the great play of Creation. “Bloodlines,” Masons, Luciferians, etc. are only puppets of this Power. They are not the thing itself.

The theory of karma and transmigration of souls belies the question of bloodlines. A soul incarnates into a plethora of bodies and circumstances. Individuals born into a family may have been that family’s dog in some past life. A family’s princeling may have had no prior connection to that family. Even the so-called genes of a person dissipate into a universal gene pool within about seven links in the chain of genealogy. The King of Babylon might be today’s charwoman in South America. A “bloodline” is a succession of disparately incarnating souls.

We’re each attached with an individual unit of Mind that can take us in any direction high or low. Our spirit is tasked with uplifting itself from lower Mind to higher Mind before it can traverse the divine regions above the eye center (tisra til in Indo-Aryan–the “open sesame” of our consciousness between and behind the two physical eyes).

The drama unfolding in the 21st century is a continuation of consciousness descending from internal to external–from spiritual to material–at a quickening pace. The future looks ever darker. The Vedic texts of Hinduism say our efforts toward improvement in this dark time register sevenfold in our spiritual accounts. If all else fails, this is our recompense. Sooner or later, actions render reactions for whole cultures and each person in this world.

john
john
Reply to  rohjo
4 months ago

It has come to our attention that there are two (2) King Charles, one who would have in theory been eligible to operate as the King of England, and one who would have been eligible to operate as the King of Scotland, neither one of which have actually occupied the soil jurisdiction owed to either Kingdom nor conformed to utter and perform under the Christian Coronation Vows required. 

We note that Charles Windsor, formerly known as Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and now functioning as His Imperial Majesty King Charles III, has removed himself to the Air Jurisdiction, while King Charles of Scotland has removed himself to the International Jurisdictions in hopes of retaining those for the countries subscribing to the Act of Union first proposed in 1689, redefined following the War of the Spanish Succession, and expanded to include Ireland and Wales by process of enclosure. 

This is International Public Notice of what these Persons are doing and how they are operating in an attempt to save themselves and their incorporated holdings at the risk of losing General Jurisdiction. 

We are not inclined to deprive the living people of England, Ireland, Scotland, or Wales, nor any country of the former Commonwealth, nor any country at all, of anything that they are owed by Nature and Common Decency; we are not their enemies. We know what they have suffered for the past 300 years. 

It is with this and our own similar sufferings in view, that we take action today to foreclose His Imperial Majesty, King Charles III, and His Royal Majesty, King Charles of Scotland, both, together with all their chartered and incorporated entities, their franchises, their derivatives, their holding companies, banks, trusts, and foundations. 

These two men occupying positions of merely legal sovereignty and the incorporated “governments” they have employed, have endeavored to fool the entire world and defraud those relying upon their administration: His Imperial Majesty, King Charles III, by evading the limitations of the Christian Monarchy and the obligations of Constitutional Monarchy, both, and King Charles of Scotland by evading the similar duties owed to the people of Scotland in favor of a purely international office purporting to own and manage the real estate of Great Britain, that is, The Chair of the Estates, all without the nicety of performing the duties and upholding the law owed to the national soil jurisdiction of each nation subscribed to the Union. 

As the soil of each nation subscribed to the British Union known as Great Britain has been vacated for the better part of three centuries, and as no known Claimant other than Lord Ivan Talbot, Hereditary Lord High Steward, has acted to preserve the nations of England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, together with the nations of the former British Commonwealth, His Imperial Majesty, King Charles III stands foreclosed in the Air Jurisdiction, and King Charles of Scotland stands foreclosed on Land and Sea, with all assets and property interests, individual and collective, returning whence they came: to the soil of each country and to the living people of each nation who have declared their birthright and populated the humble soil, and all those who will in time to come, realize their errors and do the same. 
https://annavonreitz.com/imperialmajesty.pdf

john
john
Reply to  john
4 months ago
john
john
Reply to  john
4 months ago

It’s all falling apart for the criminal enterprises. Banks and the fake monarch forfeited. Now we have, COUNCIL TAX DEBTS NOW UNENFORCEABLE! https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZFNqp0AWWvwz/

paul
paul
Reply to  john
4 months ago

if you think CT is unenforceable then I guess you havent tested the system.

paul
paul
Reply to  rohjo
4 months ago

Excellent Rohjo. Agree with your synopsis despite/in spite of the personal losses over these years. I was reading the slightly impenetrable Ouspensky the other day on Noumena and Phenomena. Eventually ones brain has to decide which way the cards fall. With angst or without.

john
john
4 months ago

I thought this man was good on His subject,a part of the jigsaw maybe.
Another two well researched writers on this important subject are Steve Quayle and LA. Marzuille.
They also bring elements of the jigsaw puzzle to the table that help give a fuller picture.
I mentioned elsewhere a Robert Sepehr an independant researcher,author and anthropologist with no religious axe to grind,yet brings a lot of historical facts that seem in agreement with the above.

L. Ashfield
L. Ashfield
4 months ago

Awesome article! I was not aware of this history. Thank you

Islander
Islander
4 months ago

The Nephilim theory that women were impregnated by fallen angels is entirely unscriptural, it is but a theory, a false one confirmed by the Lord Jesus Christ in Matthew 22:30; “For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.”

We have two bloodlines in Genesis 4 & 5, the former being the ungodly line of Cain, and the latter, the godly line of Seth. It was when “the sons of God” who descended from Seth intermarried with the ungodly line from Cain that the Nephilim came to be.

The meaning of Nephilim is not as clear as we might like it to be, for example, Strong’s concordance links it to the Hebrew verb “to fall”, thus, thinking of them as ones who fell upon others. As the two bloodlines were separate for nearly 500 years, the intermarriages would likely have given rise to a superior race of “men of great stature” or Nephilim; see Numbers 13:32-33.

This being said, as time went by, we come to the account of the “tower of Babel” in Genesis 11 which the builders “left off to build the city.” (v8). In a near (I believe within the next 5years) future time they will come back and rebuild it, in order that it will be literally destroyed as prophesied in Revelation 18.

Dismiss the speculation and stick to facts…

john
john
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

you mentioned Genesis 4 and 5,it might be worth going on to Genesis 6…for more understanding on this topic.blessings.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  john
4 months ago

?

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  john
4 months ago

Beware of disagreeing with Islander. He will make insinuations about your state of mind and run a campaign of mockery claiming that you are mentally unhinged. He can turn very nasty.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

“Dismiss the speculation and stick to facts…” – facts – what? like they can’t beam a mobile phone signal from a satellite?

You stated that as a fact (and even emphasised it with an exclamation mark!), but it was a lie. You lied.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
4 months ago

I stand by what I said-there are no satellites up there unless they are held in place by helium balloons, airplanes, helicopters, drones, etc.
I shall not engage in any future dialogue with you unless you apologise.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

Hi Islander,
Try to concentrate on things we can see like Chemtrails.
The comments by David Yates, who is involved in Lulu books, seems interesting.
We need Chemtrail reports off you, as you are in the North.
I can only make reports from Yorkshire.
Have a nice Christmas, and New Year.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

Fascinating stuff in your comment for a newbie like me Islander, was going to watch a film with my hubby, tempted to investigate what you posted further now.

Oh bless, seems poor W.S is suggesting we’re the same person now. Almost impressed by his convoluted delusions, or pure doggedness. Won’t wish you a merry xmas but think the new year/fresh start has merit.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Also strongly suspect he and John are one and the same, done so since this John starting posting almost immediately after W.S and i crossed swords.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Look at the 2nd comment and replies on this article, to possibly see what i’ve suggested:

https://expose-news.com/2023/12/12/leave-the-world-behind-has-obama-shown-us-what-the-apocalypse-looks-like/#comments

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Maybe W.S will assert he and i are the same people next.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Hello Mrs. D!

I’d rather not mention the two letters you quote-leave him to fester in his own malaise, shall we?

Regardless, seasons greetings, and a blessed new year to you and your hubby!

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
4 months ago

“The Ultimate Lie “Find your way home” – Dr. Tent reveals the truth about hidden history, little known archaeology, giants and he shows many newspaper reports of the skeletons of giants being found in the late 19th C. and early 20th C.. They were taken to the Smithsonian Institution and hidden from the public – cover up. Dr. Tent is a creationist and he mocks Darwin’s theory of evolution.

Htos1av
Htos1av
Reply to  Watcher Seeker
4 months ago

I still have 70’s era publications with all these finds referenced, recorded. The author stated he was snubbed at EVERY turn trying to research his paper. That’s when he was black pilled BEFORE the internet and PC’s.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Tony
Tony
4 months ago

http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/12/international-public-notice-foreclosing.html

International Public Notice: Foreclosing His Imperial Majesty, et alia.

It has come to our attention that there are two (2) King Charles, one who would have in theory been eligible to operate as the King of England, and one who would have been eligible to operate as the King of Scotland, neither one of which have actually occupied the soil jurisdiction owed to either Kingdom nor conformed to utter and perform under the Christian Coronation Vows required. 

We note that Charles Windsor, formerly known as Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and now functioning as His Imperial Majesty King Charles III, has removed himself to the Air Jurisdiction, while King Charles of Scotland has removed himself to the International Jurisdictions in hopes of retaining those for the countries subscribing to the Act of Union first proposed in 1689, redefined following the War of the Spanish Succession, and expanded to include Ireland and Wales by process of enclosure. 

This is International Public Notice of what these Persons are doing and how they are operating in an attempt to save themselves and their incorporated holdings at the risk of losing General Jurisdiction. 

We are not inclined to deprive the living people of England, Ireland, Scotland, or Wales, nor any country of the former Commonwealth, nor any country at all, of anything that they are owed by Nature and Common Decency; we are not their enemies. We know what they have suffered for the past 300 years. 

It is with this and our own similar sufferings in view, that we take action today to foreclose His Imperial Majesty, King Charles III, and His Royal Majesty, King Charles of Scotland, both, together with all their chartered and incorporated entities, their franchises, their derivatives, their holding companies, banks, trusts, and foundations. 

These two men occupying positions of merely legal sovereignty and the incorporated “governments” they have employed, have endeavored to fool the entire world and defraud those relying upon their administration: His Imperial Majesty, King Charles III, by evading the limitations of the Christian Monarchy and the obligations of Constitutional Monarchy, both, and King Charles of Scotland by evading the similar duties owed to the people of Scotland in favor of a purely international office purporting to own and manage the real estate of Great Britain, that is, The Chair of the Estates, all without the nicety of performing the duties and upholding the law owed to the national soil

Shelie
Shelie
4 months ago

“Men of renown” ( Nephillim), are just that men of renown. Angels can not pro-create. Mark 12:25 For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven. When the Bible says the “son’s of God took daughters of men”. It means Godly men married women who didn’t know God. Since the women raised the children, some of those children grew up to be worldly “Men of renown” (evil). As far as bloodlines go, our current rulers want you to believe they are “god” like with special powers. They are not anything but evil sick degenerates.

john
john
Reply to  Shelie
4 months ago

The original Hebrew for sons of God is Bene ha Elohim,it is an exclusive term used in the old testament about angels..Sons of God.

In Genesis 6.It says the sons of God looked on the daughters of men,seems to be two types here.
For me the original Hebrew makes more sense. This does not make them God’s,anything but,more hybrid.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  john
4 months ago

“The sons of God” were the angels in Job 1:6 & 2:1. Nevertheless, as men are made in the Divine image through Christ the Saviour, His elect are accounted sons and not bastards (Hebrews 12:7-9).

But, when exactly did the angels fall? The Scriptures teach just before God in Christ came in the flesh; Revelation 12:5.

How then were there fallen angels back in the Genesis account?

When we read of demons in the Old Testament Scriptures, this was but a pejorative term read into the text. These ‘demons’ were none other than idols of Baal worship-he goats and the like.

john
john
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

The Bible is 2 books in one. The Book of Life and the Book of the Dead. Originally, the words of God (Primal Creator) and Satan were known. To confuse the reader in later versions, “Lord” was installed for both God and Satan’s words.
Maybe you should take the time to learn a little more about Anna Von Reitz and her provenance before professing mis-understandings.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  john
4 months ago

Why not refute me from Scripture-rather than your “mis-understandings”.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

Creepy but rather funny Islander, looks like W.S in his John incarnation, is trying to mimic my style of writing.

Rather flattering in a way but definitely creepy, he’s an interesting case study for sure.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

I believe you’ve done more exposing than the Expose on this!
How many John’s are there now? and their umpteen icons? As someone said “they even talk to themselves! “And Stanley came along-remember him?! Are they all WS? As you said elsewhere, this up and down vote nonsense is manipulated for their own weird and creepy agenda, doesn’t he, or they know that all elections are rigged? There is no fear of God. Oh! and don’t ‘they’ get worked up about the non spinning ball Earth? Even Isaac Newton said “what goes up must come down”! What would he make of gravity defying satellites?

The eyes of the LORD are in everyplace, beholding the evil and the good. Proverbs 15:3.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Islander
4 months ago

The eyes of the LORD are in everyplace, beholding the evil and the good. Proverbs 15:3.”

Immediately made me think of the line “What was done in the dark will be brought to the light” from Run On/God’s Gonna Cut You Down, friend. Hope you listened to that lad singing it =)

Really loathe being sort of thought police currently but noticed some really rum stuff going on in comments. Alerted The Expose to it in that comments thread i posted a link to last night. Some of the shenanigans are troubling, in a pretty recent comments thread, there were seemingly different people, actively promoting aggression. I did call them out in a comment of my own on the thread.

You keep an eye out too if possible friend.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

Oh! and don’t ‘they’ get worked up about the non spinning ball Earth? Even Isaac Newton said “what goes up must come down”! What would he make of gravity defying satellites?”

That is just so right Islander, explains quite a lot for sure.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
4 months ago

What made me really take note of recent comment shenanigans, was their rapid escalation when our caring Government started rolling out the Prevent Strategy. Of course that strategy means trying to prevent us plebs finding out or discussing, what’s really going on. So thought it highly likely not to be coincidental.

It’s worryingly obvious trying to control the narrative in comments is the main goal, via the likes of Watcher Seeker and his many personas. More concerning is there have been quite a few attempts to provoke highly emotional, aggressive responses. Really miss the days when there was just the odd hissy fit, which was normal until around the last three months.

Htos1av
Htos1av
4 months ago

The US military DUG UP Apollyon(Nimrod) from under the Euphrates a decade ago, and he IS alive, being nephilim ,and not human, they can do that. And he “ain’t no man”.
Simply amazing that the US military is actually who revived the anti-christ.
No wonder CONUS is reduced to a 3000 mile wide pit of gray goo in only 45 minutes…

Dennymartin
Dennymartin
4 months ago

The only ones to survive the flood with Noah and his family, who had nothing to do with the Nephilim. The Nephilim All died at the flood.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] The Babylon Conspiracy viewed from two angles […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] singură ședință, îl republicăm în secțiuni dintr-o serie de articole, puteți citi partea 1 AICI. Urmează secțiunea eseului lui Ehret cu același titlu. Puteți citi eseul său complet […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE.  The following is the section of Ehret’s essay with the same title.  You can read his full […]

Carole Morgan Stewart
Carole Morgan Stewart
4 months ago

Angels cannot procreate. They are not human. David portrays them as brilliant beings created by God, “Who makes His angels spirits, His ministers a flame of fire” (Psalm 104:4). Humans, by contrast, “have been made a little lower than the angels” (Psalm 8:5). Angels do not procreate with humans. Jesus is very clear about that. That verse, the sons of God are talking about the children of Seth, Adam, and Eve that were faithful, they were still worshiping God, they were offering there at the garden, at the gates of the Garden of Eden. And then you had Cain, he departed from the Lord, and they had two separate groups of people, and Cain was in us, children of men. They weren’t the sons of God. How did he become a son of God? Behold with manner of love the father’s bestowed on us that we should be called sons of God. When we believe we are adopted in, God said to his son when he was baptized, this is my beloved son. And when we’re baptized and we accept Christ, we become sons and daughters of God. 
So it’s when the children of Seth began to intermarry with the daughters of Cain then wickedness was great in this world because of the mixed marriages. It had nothing to do with angels marrying people. They don’t have gender that way. Angels do not procreate with humans. Angels are created, they’re made by God. He makes them uniquely. And Lucifer may have been one of the first of his angels.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE and Part 2 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the same titles.  You can […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] singură ședință, îl republicăm în secțiuni dintr-o serie de articole, puteți citi partea 1 AICI și partea 2 AICI. Următoarele sunt secțiuni ale eseului lui Ehret cu aceleași titluri. Puteți […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE and Part 3 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the same […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] singură ședință, îl republicăm în secțiuni dintr-o serie de articole, puteți citi partea 1 AICIPartea 2 AICI și partea 3 AICI. Următoarele sunt secțiuni ale eseului lui Ehret cu aceleași […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE and Part 4 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] singură ședință, îl republicăm în secțiuni dintr-o serie de articole, puteți citi partea 1 AICIPartea 2 AICIPartea 3 AICI și partea 4 AICI. Următoarele sunt secțiuni ale eseului lui Ehret cu […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE and Part 4 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] fois, nous le republions en sections sur une série d’articles, vous pouvez lire la partie 1 ICI , la partie 2 ICI , la partie 3 ICI et la partie 4 ICI . Ce qui suit sont des sections de […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE and Part 4 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE and Part 4 HERE.  The following are sections of Ehret’s essay with the […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] in one sitting, we are republishing it in sections over a series of articles, you can read Part 1 HERE, Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE, Part 4 HERE and Part 5 HERE.  The following is the final part and are […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] fois, nous le republions en sections sur une série d’articles, vous pouvez lire la partie 1 ICI , la partie 2 ICI , la partie 3 ICI , la partie 4 ICI et la partie 5 ICI . Ce qui suit […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] langt essay, og Exposé har derfor valgt af genoptrykke teksten i en række af artikler:  Del 1 HERE, Del 2 HERE, Del 3 HERE, Del 4 HERE og Del […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] langt essay, og Exposé har derfor valgt af genoptrykke teksten i en række af artikler:  Del 1 HERE, Del 2 HERE, Del 3 HERE, Del 4 HERE og Del […]