Breaking News

The European Union Propose to Ban Repairs on Cars Over 15 Years Old. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The European Union is proposing a controversial piece of legislation that would effectively ban the right-to-repair for vehicles older than 15 years old. The aim according to the European Commission is “to renew the car fleet and encourage Europeans to buy new, environmentally friendly vehicles.” Thus, forcing individuals to buy newer cars, and more often while many other individuals will undoubtedly be priced out of car ownership, which will satisfy what is arguably, the real aim, the planned immobilisation of the people.

The publication Outdoor Enthusiasts Magazine (OEM) explained that ‘The Brussels proposal is based on the concept of a residual vehicle, a category for vehicles over 15 years old whose faults affect the engine, gearbox, brakes, steering, chassis or bodywork. Therefore, if this regulation is approved, the repair or replacement of any of these components in a vehicle older than 15 years will be prohibited.’

Therefore, “if a component or critical part of the vehicle cannot be repaired, this may impair the vehicle’s usage and just might cause it to to be sent to the junk heap. ‘Any vehicle destined for waste without polluting the environment and using part of its components is considered residual,’ the magazine clarifies.

“If repair is not possible, end-of-life automobile waste management. In this case, from the oldest fragments. A way to promote the so-called “circular economy.” “The point of the law”, the magazine says, “is to become the first territory/bloc in the world to cut transportation emissions down to 55% by 2030 (less than 6 six years away), apart of the “Fit for 55” scheme, and to completely eliminate them by 2050.”

EU Reasons for the Proposals

The proposal is an amendment to the European Commission’s preexisting “circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of end-of-life vehicles.”

There are objectives for the European industry to meet the the European Green Deal which aims to ensure by 2050 a “climate neutral, clean and circular economy, where the management of resources is optimised and pollution minimised.”

They have two action plans that “lay the roadmap for the European industry to meet the objectives of the Green Deal:

  • Action plan 1 , the Circular Economy, which they say targets how products are designed, promotes circular economy processes, encourages sustainable consumption and aims to make sustainable products the norm.
  • Action plan  2  the new industrial strategy for Europe with the main goal to harness the significant potential in global markets for low-emission technologies, sustainable products and services in order to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

The new Industrial Strategy for Europe “will,” says the EU Commission “lead the twin green and digital transitions and become even more competitive globally.” and will “help industry to reduce their carbon footprint by providing affordable, clean technology solutions and by developing new business models.

Affordable?

“Affordable” they say, but “affordable” is a relative term, and vast numbers of individuals will not be consumers of this new “norm.”

According to OEM ‘the reality is that many Europeans choose to extend the useful life of their vehicles. Mostly due to lack of money to buy a new car. In Portugal, one in four vehicles is over 20 years old and the average age of registered cars is over 13 years. And it’s a trend that extends to the EU’s economic powers. For example, in Germany, the average age is already 10 years old.”

“The responsibility rests with the manufacturers. Adoption of criteria for reuse of auto parts is indeed at stake. In this case, manufacturers must provide detailed instructions for replacing parts, as well as determining whether a car is still being repaired or has reached the end of its useful life. What is this for? To prevent a car that is no longer in good condition from being sold as a used vehicle.”

Mechanics Put Out of Business

WP point out that this would hit third-party auto mechanics very hard and might put them out of business, and could even potentially void the warranties on parts and vehicles in the repair is done at home.

Additionally, Spanish-based JG Classics points out that the law would attempt to mitigate the spread of scraped components through uncontrolled third countries.

The controversial proposed legislation has caused some European car enthusiasts and repairmen to chastise the proposed amendments.  Euro Weekly also highlighted “The proposal, while not forcing owners to discard their vehicles, casts doubt on the future of vehicle repairs and sales, especially for cars potentially deemed historical.”

David Knight discusses the legislation below.

The WP add that “These proposals build on top of other recently passed edicts that officially ban combustion engine cars by 2035 in the EU:


WP AUTHOR COMMENTARY

Oh yes, because filing up landfills with rusted-out cars because it has one or two bad parts is very environmentally friendly, right? We of course know this has nothing to do with climate, but total control and mitigation of our actions and freedom of travel.

There are a number of U.S. states are doing the same thing, which thereby leverages auto manufacturers to change how many combustible engine cars and parts they produce.

Haven’t you heard? “You’ll own nothing and be happy” by 2030. Source

Sources

WinePress

Outdoor Enthusiast Magazine

Euro Weekly

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alberta
Alberta
1 month ago

I’m surprised the luciferions
didn’t consider renting the condemned autos as housing

They are losing their grip.

They are out of fiat.

They are out of body parts and blood.

No one will fight their wars.

They will be hunted and destroyed.

Cheryl ROWLANDS
Cheryl ROWLANDS
1 month ago

I have a lovely little Mazda MX5 which is 15 years old (2009 plate). They can do one.

Alan
Alan
1 month ago

And what kind of “Carbon Footprint” does THAT produce!

julal
julal
1 month ago

if people do not stand up to these frigging “laws” then we just as well roll over and die. Who the hell are these UNELECTED twats ???????

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
1 month ago

How can this be good for carbon footprints? Seems Stupidity of the lowest IQ?.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
1 month ago

I don’t think so! Keep your grimy hands off my car!

Ken Hughes
Ken Hughes
1 month ago

I bought my Ex Demo’ Mercedes Benz E class estate in 2016 with the aim of running it into the ground by the time I die. I have no more money and cannot buy or rent another. I am 76 and have already done 75,000 miles. I target 200,000 miles as the cars life expectancy. I do 9,000 miles a year, therefore I will be 90 years old or dead by the time my car “dies”. It was a nice plan except for these bastards who’s intention is to dissuade anyone from doing what I plan to. ‘and all for a pointless goal of reducing carbon emissions, CO2, the gas of life. Fucking dangerous idiots!

Aluna
Aluna
1 month ago

They hate old cars because they are not plastered with chips and sim cards that track your every move, because people can repair them themselves and avoid dependency from repair shops, and because they are more mechanical than electronic and hence immune to the big EMP blackout which they are planning.
If you have an old car, hold on to it as long as possible, they don’t spy on you and when the shit hits the fan, are much more reliable.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Aluna
1 month ago

Certainly, I agree with your comment, make no mistake about it-an upvote from me.

Nevertheless, we ‘binned’ these “old cars’ yonks ago! One of my first cars was a 1970 mk1 Ford Escort 1300GT; there wasn’t one part of that car that I didn’t understand, I could mend anything on it, if it went wrong. All I had was basic tools-spanners, screwdrivers, ratchets, jacks, and other such things.

Today, well, I don’t understand any of it-we have a Hyundai that needs to be plugged into a laptop to fault find/diagnose any malfunction…

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

Heh! One of our cars is a mid-’60’s Triumph Herald which is still a good runner. ;-p

My lovely hubby was actually a town planner but a gifted mechanic, hence the Herald and Thunderbird 6T. They’re both decent performers and really have character.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Mrs D
1 month ago

Don’t get the wrong idea, we’re fairly comfortable for now but far from well off.

Just accumulated stuff over the years.

Island
Island
Reply to  Mrs D
1 month ago

As we ALL do!!!!

Island
Island
Reply to  Mrs D
1 month ago

I wouldn’t say that I was a “gifted mechanic”; not being trained, rather, self taught that is, through the process of trial and error.

I have owned literally 1000s of cars in my business life, for that was my trade-a car dealer.

I have a couple of near neighbours that currently own and drive a Triumph Herald and Dolomite Sprint as regular transport. I must say they now look very quaint and endearing compared to all the high tech cars of our day, would you agree?

Are you able to still source spares, tires and whatever for your car? The Herald shared the same chassis as the Vitesse/Spitfire/GT6, The way the bonnet lifts up-now that is something!

These cars were/are easy to repair, not being filled with electronic gadgetry as all cars are today.

Todays mechanics are nothing but fitters-they don’t mend/repair, only replace components. Think about this; how would they know if they weren’t fitting an incendiary device????

vivie
vivie
Reply to  Aluna
1 month ago

Aluna, AMEN!!! I would give almost anything to get my hands on a ’61 truck.

Tony Ryan
Tony Ryan
Reply to  Aluna
1 month ago

When the SHTF my 30 year-old 4WD will take me deep into the wilderness where I will wait out the war-to-come in luxury of a hidden hideaway… solar power, a freshwater spring, great fishing, vege garden. biodiesel made from shark livers, and a fully equipped workshop to keep everything working. I may even elect never to return, even after the globalists have all been hung.

Diane Leef
Diane Leef
Reply to  Aluna
1 month ago

96′ Chevy blazer. Can and do fix it myself.

Zinha
Zinha
Reply to  Aluna
1 month ago

100% correct

Jeff
Jeff
1 month ago

Ropes will become expensive when we do the right thing

Diane Leef
Diane Leef
Reply to  Jeff
1 month ago

Grow hemp

vivie
vivie
1 month ago

BAN this despicable ‘ban’.
Also, BAN the entities who are facilitating this preposterous idea. NOW!

Brad
Brad
1 month ago

EVs are NOT zero emissions: It takes 500,000 pounds of earth material to build a single 1,000-pound battery – NaturalNews.com
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-04-27-ev-not-zero-emissions-500000-pounds-earth-material.html#
SUBSCRIBE SHOP
EVs are NOT zero emissions: It takes 500,000 pounds of earth material to build a single 1,000-pound battery
Thursday, April 27, 2023, by: Ethan Huff
Tags: battery, carbon footprint, Censored Science, Climate, climate alarmism, climate change, conspiracy, deception, electric vehicle, electricity, Emissions, energy report, EV, fuel supply, global warming, green cult, green tyranny, Heavy metals, left cult, lies, power, power grid, science deception, truth
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:

(Natural News) The idea that electric vehicles (EVs) are somehow good for the environment is an absolute joke.
Energy analyst Mark P. Mills dropped a few bombshells this week debunking the myth that Teslas and other heaps of electric junk are “clean” or “green.”
Truth be told, EVs are far worse for the environment than internal combustion engine vehicles that run on gasoline or petrol.

“You have to dig up about 500,000 pounds of materials to make a single 1,000-pound battery,” said Mills, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a faculty fellow at Northwestern University‘s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science.

Mills went on to reveal the obscene amount of oil – yes, petroleum – it also takes to produce that same 1,000-pound battery for an EV.
“It takes 100 to 300 barrels of oil to manufacture a battery that can hold one barrel of oil equivalent of energy,” he stated – watch the video below from the Manhattan Institute to learn more:
No, such a thing as a ZERO emission vehicle 🤣 about time someone said something publicly 
https://twitter.com/i/status/1570043024075366402

Petra
Petra
1 month ago

My 19 years old car has only drove about 40.000 km and always sleeps in the garage. It looks and feels like an almost new car.

So, they want to scrap it.

So much for SUSTAINABILITY….

Robbi
Robbi
1 month ago

There are plenty of ‘Tool and Die’ people; plenty who know how to make parts. Anybody been to Cuba lately. How does anybody think they continue to keep all the antique cars and trucks on the road after 70 years?
Are people in Europe any less proficient than those of Cuba?

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: The European Union Propose to Ban Repairs on Cars Over 15 Years Old.  […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: The European Union Propose to Ban Repairs on Cars Over 15 Years Old.  […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The European Union Propose to Ban Repairs on Cars Over 15 Years Old.  – The Expose The European Union is proposing a controversial piece of legislation that would effectively ban the right-to-repair for vehicles older than 15 years old. The aim according to the European Commission is “to renew the car fleet and encourage Europeans to buy new, environmentally friendly vehicles.” Thus, forcing individuals to buy newer cars, and more often while many other individuals will undoubtedly be priced out of car ownership, which will satisfy what is arguably, the real aim, the planned immobilisation of the people. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The European Union Propose to Ban Repairs on Cars Over 15 Years Old.  – The ExposeThe European Union is proposing a controversial piece of legislation that would effectively ban the right-to-repair for vehicles older than 15 years old. The aim according to the European Commission is “to renew the car fleet and encourage Europeans to buy new, environmentally friendly vehicles.” Thus, forcing individuals to buy newer cars, and more often while many other individuals will undoubtedly be priced out of car ownership, which will satisfy what is arguably, the real aim, the planned immobilisation of the people. […]

goofy
goofy
1 month ago

During the Irish “potato” famine the english occupation came up with the law that forbade Irish ownership of ships and to go fishing. The obvious purpose was to make the famine worse.
I can detect the same mindset here in these new laws: TO MAKE LIFE MISERABLE AND DRIVE PEOPLE INTO TOTAL DESTITUTION.
What a despicable bunch of unelected creeps!

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News: […]

Theresa
Theresa
1 month ago

The government already said that the older vehicles from the ULEZ zones will be sent to Ukraine. Now it looks like we will no longer be able to have our classic cars – meanwhile the parasite elites travel in private jets> We are seeing total tyranny now.