Breaking News

We’ve done a quick search for FOIs relating to covid vaccine ingredients; here are the results

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In the UK, we have the right to request information from any public body and get answers. WhatDoTheyKnow is a non-governmental website that helps us make a Freedom of Information (“FoI”) request and publishes all the requests and responses online.

We were curious to know if our public health bodies were testing samples of batches of covid vaccines administered in the UK to ensure the ingredients were as they have publicly declared. So, we conducted a quick search.

A simple search for ““vaccine batches”” on WhatDoTheyKnow, returns 50 results with some FoIs sent to multiple institutions.  To view a list of these 50 FoIs the search words entered into the website’s search box are enclosed in double quotation marks (e.g., “search term”) to refine the search. 

A search for “vaccine batches” not enclosed in quotation marks returns 200 results, although this will include results for both of the single words “vaccine” and “batches” as well.  The word “batches” could be used to describe almost anything so many of the results will be unrelated to vaccines, let alone covid vaccines.

Below is a list of the FoIs relating to covid vaccine ingredients selected from the first two pages of results using the search term “vaccine batches” (without quotation marks). We’ve reordered the FoIs so that they are listed in ascending date order. 

Some of the FoIs are lengthy, so we have shown little more than a brief one-line extract from each.  A hyperlink to the specific FoI is contained in the institution’s name. 

In our list, for each of the FoIs, we begin with the title of the FoI followed by the date the request was made, the institution the request was made to, what the request asked (in italics), the response and the status (in bold type). Please note the status of the request is completed by the requestor and not the institution the information is being requested from.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) is the regulator of medicines, medical devices and blood components for transfusion in the UK. “We rigorously use science and data to inform our decisions, enable medical innovation and to make sure that medicines and healthcare products available in the UK are safe and effective,” MHRA states.

One of its responsibilities is to “educate the public and healthcare professionals about the risks and benefits of medicines, medical devices and blood components, leading to safer and more effective use.”

A number of the 16 FoIs below were requests made to the MHRA.  Even though this is merely a quick overview, MHRA’s responses, or lack thereof, are quite revealing and indicate they do not “rigorously use science and data” to ensure healthcare products available in the UK are safe and effective. If they are not rigorously using science and data, how are they able to educate the public and healthcare professionals about the risks and benefits of products that fall under their responsibility?


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


1. Percentage of Placebo’s in Vaccine Rollout, 18 April 2021, Public Health Scotland 

Can you confirm if, and how many placebo vaccines, by percentage or ratio, have been administered to the public in the vaccine rollout for Scotland?        

Public Health Scotland does not hold the information outlined in your request.

Placebo vaccines have not been administered as part of the vaccine rollout programme in Scotland and are only administered as part of consented clinical trials.  Furthermore, Public Health Scotland has not been directly involved in clinical trials for either the Astra Zeneca or Pfizer vaccinations.         

Successful

2. Covid vaccines and saline, 19 April 2021 and 21 April 2021, NHS England and Public Health Scotland

How many of the batches contained saline, and how many doses of saline on average per batch?   

NHS England: There are no “doses” of saline – it is contained, in a small amount, within each vaccine. 

Public Health Scotland: Public Health Scotland does not hold the information outlined in your request.           

Partially successful and Awaiting classification

3. Which medicines that are currently being used in England, contain graphene oxide or derivatives of graphene oxide, 5 October 2021, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency     

Which medicines that are currently being used in England, contain graphene oxide or derivatives of graphene oxide?

And please specify if any of the ingredients of any medicines are not published due to trade secrets.

Do you obtain independent laboratory reports to confirm the ingredients or do you rely on the drug manufacturer?

Please let me have a copy of the independent laboratory reports detailing the analysis of the ingredients of the Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 “vaccines.”   

No licensed medicines or those under emergency use in England contain graphene.

All excipients are published.

No licensed medicines or medicines under emergency use authorisation in England contain either graphene oxide or derivatives of graphene oxide.

There are no “trade secret” ingredients which are not published.

All vaccines authorised and deployed in the UK have been subject to rigorous checks by the MHRA, including individual batch testing and site inspections, even where those sites are outside the UK.

Regarding your request for the independent laboratory reports detailing the analysis of the ingredients of the Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccines, MHRA neither confirms nor denies that it holds information falling within the description specified in your request. 

Information not held (Note: an internal review was requested.)

4. Contaminants in the UK Covid experimental vaccines, 12 January 2022, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency     

Can you please clarify if routine independent batch testing of sample vials is invasive (i.e. it involves testing of the actual content of the vials) and, if so,  who holds the related images and data, if not you?

We have already responded about visual inspection and it is not an invasive test.

Long overdue

5. Manufacturing tolerances and Quality Assurance of COVID-19 vaccines, 21 February 2022, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency   

[Please provide] full manufacturing specifications of the contents of all Covid-19 vaccines licenced by MHRA.

This information would be exempt under Section 41 and Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act.

Refused (Note: an internal review was requested to no avail.)

6. Analytical methods used in batch testing covid-19 vaccines, 24 March 2022, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency     

Does MHRA/NIBSC have access to any of the following analytical methods?

MHRA/NIBSC does have access to some of the analytical methods listed. They are not used in the assessment of COVID-19 vaccines, other than optical microscopy that is used for some potency assays.

Partially successful

7. RNA integrity of experimental modRNA covid-19 drugs (Pfizer and Moderna), 21 June 2022, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency    

With respect to Pfizer’s product BNT162b2 (Comirnaty), please supply all results available to the MHRA indicating the RNA integrity of Process 1 batches for clinical supply and the RNA integrity of Process 2 batches for commercial supply.

Regarding the [above] request, the information requested concerns parts of the quality dossier that are commercially sensitive and so would be exempt from release under Section 41 (Information provided in confidence) and Section 43 (Commercial interests).

Refused (Note: an internal review was requested to no avail.)

8. Covid-19, 14 November 2022, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

What technology is used to test the vial’s contents?

Visual inspection – Performed for COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and AZ.

Successful

9. Recall of Moderna vaccine in Japan, 25 January 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Was any independent chemical or physical analysis (including holding a magnet close to the material) performed on the Moderna vaccine performed prior to approval of any marketing authorisation?

Representative samples from all batches of Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine that are deployed in the UK undergo independent laboratory testing at NIBSC prior to their release. These tests include visual inspection and laboratory tests to measure purity, content and identity. Please find more details is the following link: HERE.

Partially successful

10. Vaccine Contents, 20 February 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Will you give a fully independent, audited lab analysis of the contents of various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation in the UK?

Can you confirm that ALL UK vaccines for Covid-19 and the current annual flu vaccines DO NOT contain PEG or hydrogel and DO contain biologics as listed and authorised for use?

All batches of licenced Covid vaccines that have been used in the UK vaccination programme have been independently tested under Statutory Rules.

The testing carried out for different vaccines is based on the EU Guidelines for Official Control Authority Batch Release (OCABR) for Human Biologicals: Vaccines, blood and plasma derivatives which can be found on the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare (EDQM) website. Human OCABR Guidelines – European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (edqm.eu). Within this link the requirements for testing of influenza vaccines is outlined. Covid vaccines are tested according to the OCABR activities related to COVID-19 vaccines – European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (edqm.eu).

Successful (Note: as MHRA neither confirmed or denied whether they hold the information requested and have not applied an exemption that would remove this obligation, an internal review was requested to no avail.)

11. Host Cell Protein (HCP) Impurities in COVID-19 Vaccines, 31 March 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Please provide the following data concerning host cell protein (HCP) impurities …

Peer-reviewed research from the University of Ulm has characterised 44-71% of total protein content from all 4 AstraZeneca lots tested as being of human origin. Please therefore also disclose any communication between the MHRA and AstraZeneca on human HCPs and any actions taken by the MHRA in response to the study results.

These data are exempt under Sections 41 and 43 of the FOI Act.   

Refused (Note: as the response was unsatisfactory an internal review was requested to no avail.)

12. Contaminated modRNA covid-19 Vaccines, 28 July 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

[Please provide] all documentation is available to the MHRA on batches and vials disposed and/or rejected due to contamination and/or impurities throughout 2023 to date.

We hold the information for all parts of your request apart from “quantification of the contaminants/impurities” [and] “date contaminated batch/vial disposed/rejected,” we do not hold this information.

Partially successful

13. Presence of fragmented DNA and SV40 enhancer found in the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine, 9 November 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Has the MHRA ever independently tested the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine at the vial level?

In the context of fragmented DNA and SV40 enhancer MHRA has not tested the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine at the vial level.

Partially successful

14. Who must test each mRNA COVID-19 batches before they are released if MHRA has not full list of the ingredients? 27 November 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Who must test each mRNA covid-19 batch before they are released?

The batches of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines for Pfizer and Moderna are tested by the company before they are released; the batches are then also tested by MHRA (formerly NIBSC, note the website is due to be updated).

Partially successful

15. Genotoxicity of mRNA products, 30 November 2023, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Can you categorically confirm that the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in use/past use in the UK does NOT contain the SV40 large T antigen?     

Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40) is a virus present in monkey kidney cells.  We are not aware of any Covid-19 vaccine containing SV40 virus or SV40 antigens. A short sequence of the nucleic acid from the SV40 virus is present in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, but this is not the sequence coding for the SV40 large T antigen (see Figure 1 of ‘BNT162b vaccines protect rhesus macaques from SARS-CoV-2’ : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03275-y) and therefore the vaccine cannot direct the synthesis of that antigen.

Successful

16. Did you test the vaccines for SV40 yet? If not when are you going to test mRNA vaccines for SV40 or other contaminants? 2 January 2024, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Did you test the vaccines for SV40 yet?

If not, when are you going to test mRNA vaccines for SV40 or other contaminants?

Independent laboratory testing of vaccines is carried out by the MHRA’s Official Medicines Control Laboratory (OMCL) (with a NIBSC certificate being applied to compliant batches). The independent testing does not verify the composition of the vaccine, rather it assesses key parameters that focus on biological quality of the product.

There are currently no intentions to test mRNA vaccines for the presence of SV40 or other contaminants.         

Awaiting classification

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
coline
coline
1 month ago

“Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”
“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”
Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events.
https://vigilantnews.com/post/5-times-dr-zev-zelenkos-bold-claims-became-undeniably-true/?

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  coline
1 month ago

Hi coline,
What you say could be true.
What we need to know, is who has a MAC address, coming from them.
The Graphene Oxide is the sudden death killer.
Hence, why there are a lot of MAC address’s in cemeteries.

ChemtrailPoision
ChemtrailPoision

ChemtrailPoision pollutes the sky
While the Vatican’s Eugenicist Royal Elites Blackmail Politicians of Pedophilia Corruption.
Ancient Institutionalized Pedophilia
Descends From Pagan Rome’s Deities.
Zeus and Jupiter’s Abduction of Ganymede Continues into the Vatican’s Corruption of Christianity.
Clear the Sky of: ChemtrailPoision by Striking the Achilles’s Heel of Pedophile Corruption.

BERGOGLIO: POPE FRANCIS IS THE ANTICHRIST – Fighting Monarch

CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE UNDERLIES THE DEEP STATE: A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE – Fighting Monarch

Illuminati Defector Described Horrifying Satanic Rituals – Humans Be Free

ChemtrailPoision
ChemtrailPoision
Reply to  ChemtrailPoision
1 month ago

Gaze at a Website

https://www.ganymededesign.com/

Of a Network That Builds the Museums of Cities.
Modeled in the Image of their Ancient Roman Pedophile Deity:
Jupiter.
Constructing the Children’s minds.
As the fate of Ganymede.

comment image

SAbi3
SAbi3
Reply to  coline
1 month ago

Many type were examined, if you want details what were found in them, watch the video of La Quinta Columna (latest), you can find it even on Icke’s site.
https://davidicke.com/2024/04/04/analysis-on-covid-vaccines-performed-by-professor-lorena-diblasi-and-dr-marcela-sangorrin-subtitled-and-a-must-watch/

One thing is sure, they are not mRNA, none of them are. They used public notary, no messing with the vials or results.

No nitrogen, no phosphorus, everything else: yes, mainly metals and very rare elements used (according to science) for quantum dots (your brain’ modification).

vax_antennas.JPG
Vaxx...
Vaxx...
Reply to  SAbi3
1 month ago

The…Vaxx…establishment is indemnified from vaccine harm…

https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

Wisenox
Wisenox
1 month ago

Should have asked about IRES’s from picornaviruses, which are in the patents.
Main stream media wants you to believe that IRES’s are some kind of new pathogen called viroids, but they look exactly like IRES’s.
Baric patented coronavirus in 2018 and listed Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis as a component. VEEV is a picornavirus with an IRES.
Also, the FOI dates should be updated. Carbon nanotubes are in the patents. Not found in 2021 is meaningless, and this is further exemplified by the fact that some data are exempt.

Vaxx...
Vaxx...
Reply to  Wisenox
1 month ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520177/

“It appears that this is the first report of a plasma HIV RNA increase after vaccination with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a patient with documented adherence, possibly reflecting induced proviral transcription. Peculiarities of the case were advanced HIV infection with a high baseline VL set-point (6.7 log 10) before a relatively recently …”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full

“To our surprise, all the 4 inserts in the 2019-nCoV mapped to short segments of amino acids in the HIV-1 gp120 and Gag among all annotated virus proteins in the NCBI database.”

“Our results highlight an astonishing relation between the gp120
and Gag protein of HIV, with 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein. These proteins are critical for the
viruses to identify and latch on to their host cells and for viral assembly (Beniac et al., 2006).
Since surface proteins are responsible for host tropism, changes in these proteins imply a change
in host specificity of the virus. According to reports from China, there has been a gain of host
specificity in case 2019-nCoV as the virus was originally known to infect animals and not humans
but after the “mutations”, it has gained tropism to humans as well.”

This paper has been attacked by the Vaxx…medical establishment and withdrawn…arrive at your own conclusions…

Mary Ann Dowrick
Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

Clear as mud

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

john
john
1 month ago

It was always about murdering as many as possible before they saw sense and undid what had been done through the fraudulent birth registration process. From the sea to the Land to the Soil. At which point, the perpetrators lose control of the assets and credit belonging to the man or woman who were once legal fiction persons.

” This is yet another example of the self-interested Municipal and British Crown Corporations and their Personnel offering our assets as chattel backing their debts and our physical assets as payment to their secondary creditors, when in fact they were and are over 35 Trillion dollars in debt to us and have been in debt to us longer than any other Creditor of theirs except, possibly, the people of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. These practices of fraud leading to economic and financial peonage and enslavement, coercive control and abuse for political advantage must come to an end and a settlement. None of us agreed, for example, to enshrine a coercive commodity transfer monopoly, the Swift System, created by the same people who were busted for a similar transfer monopoly of crude oil and refined oil transfers while doing business as Standard Oil, nor have we voluntarily granted these criminals any kind of control over our ability to transact in international trade or commerce, either one. Such coercive control is only established if one accepts the idea that 320 million Americans knowingly agreed to act as Federal Dual Citizens and obligate themselves as both U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States under contract to these service purveyors as indentured servants and slaves. We would not encourage anyone in such a misapprehension. We believe that it is glaringly self-evident and has been self-evident for a long time that the Swift System used to make bank transfers has been operated by the Rockefeller and Standard Oil Heirs as the same kind of illegal transfer monopoly as the Standard Oil transfer monopoly that was busted in the early 1900s for monopolizing transfer of oil commodities— only this time, the commodity being transferred is bank currency on a worldwide basis. The Swift System Transfer Monopoly is just another example of the patently criminal nature of these commercial and municipal corporations masquerading as “our” government, and the overall criminality of the Central Banks, which were created for unlawful and illegal purposes of commodity rigging and control from the beginning of their existence”.
 https://annavonreitz.com/2014finaljudgment.pdf

Jimmy Jukebox
Jimmy Jukebox
1 month ago

It’s like what Dr David Martin said: We can Prove the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines are no good But The Medical Professionals, the medical establishment and media and politicians seem to not understand, and nit care…..