|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Why doesn’t Vladimir Putin fire all the Globalists in the Russian government? Rurik Skywalker asks. Because Putin is a dedicated Globalist himself.
The BRICS countries’ governments have been chosen to be their local satrapies, he says. “The process to “multipolarise” the world is actually the process by which the world is globalised even further, and local elites deputised to carry out the globalisation agenda in their own regions.”
Ultimately, it is a “convergence” of the East’s oligarchs and the West’s oligarchs so they become a single global oligarchy.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Why Doesn’t Putin Fire All the Globalists in Russia’s Government? Because Putin is a dedicated Globalist himself.
The following is extracted from an article written by Rurik Skywalker, a pseudonym for Rolo Slavskiy, published on his Substack page titled ‘ The Slavland Chronicles’. Click on the title above to read the full article.
I didn’t actually understand what “multipolarity” was and how it would be accomplished exactly. All I had was the vague notion that the dollar would be detonated by Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping somehow at some point. Even now, I don’t understand what it really means.
The news that has been dominating the cycle the last week has been this Kazan conference [a BRICS summit being held in Kazan, Russia]. Otherwise, it has been a slow news week. There was confirmation of North Koreans training to deploy to Donbass, which was exciting I guess, and some villages swapped hands there too (I’m just guessing, actually), but other than that, all quiet on the Eastern Front.
I find the BRICS news stories to be very boring and rarely report on them, usually.
More interesting is the deeper discussion on what “multipolarity” even is, really. Like, for example, I just learned the other day that Boris Yeltsin claimed that he was building a multipolar world with his reforms in the 1990s.
We haven’t done a deep dive into Boris Yeltsin on the blog yet as we did on the other Soviet leaders from Stalin onwards, but I think most people know what a disaster Yeltsin was for Russia and how he essentially dismembered the country and made it into a Western satrapy. Even the current ZAnon narrative is that Putin tricked Yeltsin into making him president because Putin was a secret KGB patriot trying to save Russia. This is how they explain away the great betrayer Boris Yeltsin’s inexplicable decision to appoint a secret patriot who would go on to reverse all of his policy decisions and Make Russia Great Again.
Of course, Putin did no such thing, and he simply continued and solidified Yeltsin’s policies, but still, that is the yarn that I used to believe in as well and I got it from reading Saker 10 years ago.
Digression aside, while Yeltsin was acting as a puppet for Washington and destroying Russia, he claimed that he was ushering in a new multipolar world order.
Here are the relevant quotes that I found from a new blogger* here on the ‘stack:
This tripolar deal was struck in April 1997, between President Yeltsin and President Jiang Zemin who signed ‘The Russian-Chinese Joint Declaration on a Multipolar World and the Establishment of a New International Order’, addressed to the United Nations.
“In a spirit of partnership, the Parties shall strive to promote the multipolarisation of the world and the establishment of a new international order. The Parties believe that profound changes in international relations have taken place at the end of the twentieth century. The cold war is over. The bipolar system has vanished. A positive trend towards a multipolar world is gaining momentum, and relations between major States, including former cold-war adversaries, are changing.”
“Some are pushing toward a world with one centre,” said Yeltsin at the time. “We want the world to be multipolar, to have several focal points. These will form the basis for a new world order.” Yeltsin said the meeting between the one-time rivals had “a tremendous, perhaps even historic importance, because we’re determining the fate of the 21st century. Seeking to counter American clout and NATO’s eastward expansion, Russia is looking for new allies in Asia, with China foremost among them.”
I bring this up to point out that being pro-multipolar doesn’t mean that someone is a patriot or a nationalist or a defender of one’s own country against Globalism. In fact, as I discussed before, “multipolarism” is a term used to describe the literal opposite of what is actually being built.
Further resources: Making Sense of Multipolarity w/ Iain Davis, The Slavland Chronicles, 4 February 2024
What multipolarism actually is appears to be nothing more than the consolidation of globalism.
The problem is that political words do not mean what people think they mean. Like, “the Proletariat” isn’t a bunch of workers in overalls at the steel mill, really. Because in actual political history, the Dictatorship of the Proletariat ended up actually being a gang of Russian-speaking Jews from the Pale of Settlement, mostly.
For example, Trotsky, one of the richest men in the world who had never worked a day in his life considered himself and his comrades to be proletarians. Thus, when you read “Proletariat” in the official speeches and books of the Communists, you have to remember to switch the words out for their true meanings to understand what is really being said.
It is the same with “multipolarism,” really.
You need to swap the word out for “more globalism” and then the speeches and policy papers put out by the big international organisations start to make sense again.
What is being called “multipolarism” is nothing more than the delegation of enforcement responsibilities to forward operation bases that have been set up all over the world in the aftermath of World War II and the end of the Cold War. In other words, Globalism needs forward operating bases in Eurasia or South America, and they have chosen these BRICS countries’ governments to be their local satrapies. The process to “multipolarise” the world is actually the process by which the world is globalised even further, and local elites deputised to carry out the globalisation agenda in their own regions.
That is why there is no discernible difference between BRICS multipolar policies and globalism policies.
Even the aesthetic choices are the same:
Personally, I once accepted all of these ZAnon narratives about Putin and BRICS, and the Antifa anti-Globalist BRICS forces outsmarting the West and winning the great geostrategic chess game simply on faith and a desire to believe.
The only problem with believing in this narrative was that only the internet prophets like Saker and Martyanov and others had the inside track on things. There was no other way to independently come to these conclusions or to verify them. Luckily, ZAnon deigned to reveal bits and scraps of the master plan to their readers piece by piece, for which we were expected to be very grateful and generous with our donations.
Again, upon further reflection, it was simply a religion, this entire ZAnon movement.
In contrast, I decided to take the complete opposite approach with my writing and analysis on this blog.
I simply present what Putin and his government say or have said.
I also share what anti-Putin patriotic Russians say about the Kremlin. There is no convoluted shadow-war narrative here on my blog. People who write to me claiming that they don’t understand what I am saying are actually seeking psychological and emotional help. It is not that they cannot understand what I am saying, it is that they cannot accept what I am saying.
For example, a clip of Press Sec. Peskov popped up into my feed recently in which he explained that Putin is a committed Liberal ideologue (see HERE):
Some people abroad and in Russia think that Putin is a conservative, a statist strongman for whom “freedom” is a foreign word. But Putin is a total Liberal by his nature. He is far more Liberal than the pseudo-Liberals in the opposition. He is a total Liberal in his economic policies and his social policies. This is definitely true. We must understand this.
Note from The Exposé: The word “liberal” is one of the most abused words in the English language. The word “liberal” simply means, in short, “free.” In the context of liberal democracy, the word “liberal” refers to a set of principles and values that emphasise individual freedom, rights and protections. In the USA, “liberal” is used to describe people on the political left and is frequently used the same way on social media by non-Americans who regularly follow American news sources. In Canada, the Liberal Party is on the political left. In Australia, the Liberal Party is on the political right. And in Russia, although its history is more complex, it is now used pejoratively, implying a pro-Western, anti-Russian stance. It seems many Russians associate liberalism with attempts to undermine the country’s sovereignty and cultural heritage.
And then Colonel Kvatchkov, the man who personally tried to assassinate Anatoly Chubais, Yeltsin’s and Putin’s top economic guy forcing Liberalism on Russia, chimed in with his commentary on the clip:
Probably thousands and thousands of people are asking themselves why Putin is not really fighting the West, why he signed the Minsk agreement, the Gomel-Istanbul agreement, the grain deal and is now begging the enemy for negotiations instead of winning. Many are also asking themselves why they are not cleaning out the 5th column, why they are not changing the colonial financial system, why industrialisation is not being carried out, why the investigation of the seemingly most obvious crime in the case of the liquidation of Ernest and Goodwin is being swept under the carpet, and many, many other questions.
Unfortunately, people do not want to hear simple and understandable truths. Moreover, having heard them, citizens do not believe what they have heard and begin to construct various cunning plans in their heads, just so as not to start acting in accordance with what they have heard. But Putin’s press secretary gave an answer to all these questions a long time ago.
As Kvatchov observed, people will simply deny this observable reality because it is difficult for them to accept. They will always deny the visible and the obvious for a convoluted alternative narrative if that alternative is more “optimistic.” Of course, all the proofs that we have in the media and on the ground, so to speak, are proofs that Putin is indeed pro-West, pro-Multikulti, pro-Israel and so on. But this is simply ignored, or, better yet, this is framed as being political kayfabe or strategic maskirovka.
Putin is a secret patriot double agent who tricked the Globalists into making him president, after all.
Like Stieglitz, Vladimir Putin’s entire persona is based on a fictional USSR spy character.
I can spam them clips of Putin saying that he intends to run Russia as a for-profit corporation to no avail.
Related: Young Putin in His Own Words: “Russia Must Not Be Allowed to Have a Strong Leader!” The Slavland Chronicles, 5 October 2023
But the problem isn’t a complication on my part. Nothing about this is complicated or convoluted in the slightest. Not even a little.
And in the spirit of clarity, I will review some of the most basic ideas that have been presented on this blog over the last 2 or more years. There have been many essays written to provide proof for these basic ideas and to furnish many examples and to flesh out the details from every angle conceivable. Perhaps there are too many foreign-sounding names in these essays, true, but again, the underlying ideas are quite easy to understand.
Let’s review the key points:
- Top Soviet spook Andropov hatched a plan to reform the USSR and merge it with the West using his KGB to eliminate all resistance to this Convergence agenda.
- Gorbachev (and Yakovlev) surrendered entirely to the West instead of enforcing the original terms of Convergence and becoming equal partners.
- Then we had Yeltsin, who oversaw the transition of Russia from a superpower to a resource colony of the West and the territorial dismemberment of Russia.
- (We have not covered the Yeltsin period yet in detail. It is next on the blog’s long to-do list.)
- Putin came to power as a hand-picked successor to Yeltsin and to solidify and stabilise the new satrap neoliberal model that Yeltsin had implemented with the help of Washington in Russia.
- Putin and his KGB people were upset that the West reneged on the power-sharing deal thanks to Gorbachev and sought to restore some of the privileges and power that was promised them under Andropov.
- This led Putin to start causing troubles for the West, to try and raise the costs for Washington and to convince them to return to the bargaining table and to bring the Kremlin back in as equal or senior partners at least of the Globalist world order.
- Thus, Putin is willing to fight back, but only in a limited way; the goal isn’t to topple Globalism though, but to negotiate a better place in the pecking order for the Kremlin and his buddies.
A good metaphor or analogy for the situation is the Italian mob as presented on American TV and cinema. In the mob movies, the wop gangsters are always whacking each other and feuding.
But when they do, does it mean that the guy getting whacked or doing the whacking is not a wop mobster himself? No, we as the audience understand that we are watching an internecine spat usually revolving around someone stealing too much from their boss or someone breaking the confidence of the group by snitching. We understand that the whacker and the whackee are both members of the mafia and that there is no “good guy” in the conflict really.
As regards foreign policy, I can also clearly and concisely explain what I see happening in the world:
- Washington routinely puts their puppets into power using wars, coups, colour revolutions, etc.
- Washington then routinely topples their puppets with wars, coups, colour revolutions, etc.
- Washington then puts new puppets into power who do nothing while the country implodes and careens into new wars, coups, and colour revolutions.
- Washington then supports new puppets and helps them get into power.
- Washington then supports the opposition to these puppets and plunges the country into crisis and chaos.
- Washington then topples the puppets that they put into power using war, coups, and colour revolutions, etc.
- Washington then …
I can back this thesis up with literally countless examples of American foreign policy playing out over the last century. But you only really need to look at the tragic story of Iraq or Afghanistan (something that my American readers should know something about) to see exactly what I am talking about.
Thus, again, just because Washington wants to topple a government or a leader, it doesn’t mean that this targeted leader is automatically a good guy or a patriotic leader or even resisting Washington seriously. In actual observable reality, Washington-appointed dictators have all folded like cheap suits when Washington came to topple them later.
Yes, there are a few examples of Washington-based puppets resisting their eventual toppling, but they are few and far between. Take Fidel Castro, for example, who was chosen by the CIA to topple Batista in Cuba. When it came time for him to pay the devil his due, Fidel dug in his heels and resisted dozens of assassination attempts and even a full-blown invasion followed by a full economic blockade to starve him out. Fidel managed to stay in power by getting serious and bucking his handlers. That being said, he also put thousands of Cubans into death camps and deeply impoverished his own people with his insane Communist policies. And that was the original purpose of the CIA backing Castro to begin with. That is what they seek to accomplish when they put these tinpot dictators into power. From Saddam to the Mullahs to Pol Pot to Castro and all the other psychos in between.
The purpose is simple: to weaken these countries from without or within.
Now, originally, I thought that Putin, a Washington-appointed puppet ruler of Russia, was going to pull a Castro. And that was the original thesis of this blog for almost the first year of my writing. I concluded that with the SMO, Putin was finally slipping his Washington-held chains – that he had seen how Washington murdered all of its former allies and realised that he was next unless he got serious. I even compared him to Stalin, who hardened up and dropped some of the worst elements of Communism and embraced nationalism to be able to survive the German invasion.
However, as time went on, no serious reforms were undertaken by the Kremlin and the handling of the war showed just how brutally disfigured the Russian military had become under Putin’s reign, I had to reconsider my framing of the situation.
It is clear to me even now that Putin is NOT getting serious and that this was NOT a bid for political freedom and the re-establishment of Russian sovereignty from the Globalist system. I realised that this was simply an inter-oligarchic spat that had gotten out of control. That Putin had been given assurances by Washington that he would be allowed to conduct his SMO in Kiev in peace, (like Saddam with Kuwait), and that he had been led by the nose into a trap.
A Slavic Afghanistan, if you will.
Once I was forced to accept this reality, I began to write essays about how Russia had been taken over by the Globalists and how we had gotten to this point where there is a foreign occupation government in Moscow, again. This brings us full circle to the concept of Convergence again – the process by which the elite of East and West were supposed to converge into one Globalist elite.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
there’s a lot to this, but essentially why would the global elite go to ‘war’ with each other, economically or literally? it’s like mobsters carving up between themselves.
I think the whole thing is a muse to keep us busy and off the issues that matter most , confusion and division is their weapon of choice ( fear ) in the end the u s dollar will be worthless.
So that we fight each other rather than fighting them. And so that they can declare martial law. And so that they can make vaccine passport Digital IDs into ration books.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1826409318578565326
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1824069681868669045
Follow the money. Who benefits from the war in Ukraine? According to RFK it is Blackrock. 3 mins.
https://rumble.com/v5dc1ir-rfk-jr.-about-the-role-of-blackrock-in-the-ukraine-war.html
The most normal thing in the world is not being able to understand it when it is explained to you as in the article. Because nothing is explained, on the contrary: you are told two mutually exclusive things – they are both together, and they are fighting each other. With the profound explanation of a “battle for supremacy between gangster partners” and the like, an “explanation” shared throughout the all “more critical alt-media sector”. Nonsense from everywhere.
Check out my comment below to make your lamp shine.
Or, in other words: there is no war, there is an organized optimization of the working process of the world’s transition to the new technological order, which includes the highly undesirable future of chips and genetic modifications.
The Sixth Kondratieff Wave and the Cybernetic Revolution
“…As regards the 1990s – 2020s (the intermediate phase of the Cybernetic Revolution) the question is that the launch of a new innovative breakthrough demands that the developing countries reach the level of the developed ones, and the political component of the world catches up with the economic one; all this needs changes of the structure of societies and global relations… introduction and distribution of the new basic technologies do not occur naturally, but only within the appropriate social political environment. In order for basic innovations to be suitable for business, structural changes in political and social spheres are necessary, eventually promoting their synergy and wide implementation in the world of business…We believe that at present we witness the downward phase of the fifth K-wave which will last till the early or the mid-2020s.”
– Says in 2014 the russian authors of “Covid19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations” at the end of 2021, who at the beginning of 2022 were included by Klaus Schwab in “the list of 50 “foremost global thinkers and opinion-makers” who concerning the vision of the future world contributed to the new book “Great Narrative For a Better Future” (the continuation of book “Covid19: The Great Reset” by Klaus)
“The research “COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations” has been supported by the (Presidential) Russian Science Foundation (RSF) and is a part of the RSF project “World development and “limits of growth” in the 21st century: modeling and forecast”
…
“In 2022, the following scientific results were obtained within the framework of the project “World Development and the Limits of growth in the 21st century: modeling and forecasting”.
..
The results of mathematical modeling have shown that humanity is currently moving to a fundamentally new phase of historical development, when the old economic and social technologies no longer work. There is a transition of human society into a new phase state, the shape of which has not yet been determined. In this situation, we are not talking about forecasting, but about designing the future in new historical conditions. The analysis of options for further world development is made. Based on the analysis and modeling results, a project of the future society with the conditional name “World-organism” is proposed, based on the primacy of the principles of cooperation over the principles of competition. If this project is implemented, as mathematical modeling shows, it is possible to solve global problems related to ecology, global warming, and energy. Based on the conducted research, an initiative report was prepared to the Rome Club, which was sent to the Club’s management.”
Some publications of the (Presidential) Russian Science Foundation project “Global Development and Growth Margins in the 21st Century: Modeling and Forecasting”: “Developed and developing countries: towards a common goal at different speeds” and “Crossing the Threshold of Cyborgization”
Cool, isn’t it?
But, why on earth should we be bored with this, when we can discuss for the thousandth time the mafia story about the origin of the ghost state in Russia and why the real real war is happening.
I’m still trying to get my head around the whole subject.
But when I ask the question “which of the Global Leaders is doing most for his/their citizens?” I don’t think names like Biden, Sunak, Starmer, Macron, Trudeau………however I do think PUTIN.
Maybe I’ve been conned???
My brain hurts when people say or write that the Freemason and ex KGB officer Putin are going to “save us” from the globalists that also want to conquer poor Russia. That country was conquered in 1917 and is still a captured operation as all other countries in the world.
The main purpose of all wars are to grind down that part of population willing to bear arms. In the Ukraine Slav slaves are killing other slave Slavs and if this crap or the ME thing goes global then it will be a blood fest were all nationalities are grinding each other down.
All wars need an enemy and Putin plays the role of a perceived enemy to globalism when he in reality is a our enemy as all other world misleaders. If he would have been the real deal he would have exposed the Convid scam turning people of all western countries against their own governments since all of them are his supposed enemies.
But he did not do this. Instead he went into the Ukraine when the global injection party went sour so the “vaccine” brain damaged herd got something new to focus on other than their injection damage.
My reading of this is that the current ‘globalism’ is two separate sides competing for one ‘globalism’, which amounts to ‘bipolarism’ that is actual ‘multipolarism’ until one side wins, takes over and actually makes it one ‘globalism’.
I can live with that until the global corporate conspiracy fronted by the WEF and their “Great Reset” are shattered, and we return to sovereign nations chastened into peaceful cooperation by the experience of the last few years.
Hi Herb Weber, like any mafia mob, there are families competing with each other but they are all the same mob.
So you might have one crime family vying to be top dog and another crime family vying to be top dog, but whichever family is top dog is irrelevant because it is still the mafia working together towards the same aims.
What the article is saying is the the Eastern mafia families are merging with the Western mafia families so that there is just the one global mafia – this is nearly complete. But in the final stages of implementing that “multipolar” new world order, they are having internal battles to decide who will be top dog. For us, whichever crime family is top dog, the result is the same – a world run by and controlled by oligarchs, a Global mafia under the auspices of the UN-WEF partnership.
The BRICS project was started 23 years ago by Goldman Sachs. It is a bankers’ initiative, not a Russian or Chinese government initiative. BRICS is part of the UN and part of the UN’s global agenda. (The UN being one of the global mafia’s organisations that they work through and another being the World Economic Forum.) BRICS has, for at least 20 years, been part of the “New World Order” plan. With BRICS, Russia has been brought completely into the Global mafia’s fold. Russia is not against, separate to or independent of the Global mafia, they are now officially recognised as part of it. See:
1. https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/history/moments/2001-brics.html
2. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/10/1156086
Agree with you Rhoda, provide it is understood that your “mafia” is the ‘Global Corporate Compact’ (as I call it), the WEF its coordinating ‘Secretariat’, and the “Reset” the selected means to achieve it. That is the NWO I perceive from the available information.
The Mafia we know were mere ‘pikers’ in comparison. The NWO merely is a throw-back to the original and perpetual times the ‘masses’ – from family, to village, to tribe, to nation state – were ruled by an ‘elite’ identified by ability, birth or power. The difference is now that it is working together for the same own benefit on a global scale.
Hi Herb Weber, I’ve not heard of the “Global Corporate Compact” being used, as you mentioned it is a term you use to describe a collective so it may not be widely used. However, it is not only private corporations that are involved, it is much more invasive than that.
The network I’m referring to is what they call themselves officially. I’m not inventing new terms. It is the Global Public Private Partnership, headed by the United Nations and the World Economic Forum through a strategic partnership that was signed between the two NGOs in 2019.
This is how they describe it, using their terms, and if you do a search for these terms (Global Public Private Partnership “GPPP” or “G3P” and UN-WEF strategic partnership) you will see what they mean by them, what the aim is and what it encompasses.
It is a network of governments (local, regional, central and federal), private corporations (headed by 1,000 members of WEF) and selected non-governmental organisations – yes, numerous so-called charities, philanthropic foundations and “community groups” of all shapes and sizes are also in this network. And it is worldwide, i.e. global – it is not the West vs the East, it is global. It has its tentacles throughout societies and governments in the North, South, East and West. I have yet to come across a country where this insidious agenda is not being rolled out through various actors (employed by governments, companies, charities etc) who are under the control of the UN-WEF public private partnership. Globally, they are moving in “lockstep.” Russia (and the BRICS countries) is no exception.
Rhoda, I used ‘Global Corporate Compact’ after three years of using other terms, such as ‘Global Corporate/WEF Conspiracy’ because it covers it all, and is way beyond conspiracy as an agreement, plot or ‘compact’. Going by your subsequent Expose, we are are in agreement.
Once again, and with great displeasure, because my brain hurts to repeat it in different ways, to repeat:
There is no competition and no internal battle for the best dog between the global mafia. There is a concerted and strictly executed common spectacle with the common goal of bringing the world into a new technological reality, with a new communication-information structure, including brain-computer interfaces and various sensors built into the body, and genetic manipulations – to mention just two. Or in other words: there is a negotiated spectacle of the transition of the world to the next technological order, also known to us as the world after the great reset with the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) – something that is so out of the normal that it cannot become effective without crisis solutions in crisis reality.
After the “war” 2022, this same thing, this radical transformation to a new technological order (in Putin’s words) that started powerfully during the plandemic, in Russia has turned – spoken, ordered and stimulated by Putin, the government, business, science and all important factors – from a very desirable (and “stimulated by the pandemic” – Putin) to the number one state goal – “to save the state”, “to cope with the sanctions reality”, “for sovereignty”, “for an advantage in the technological race in the new technological reality”.
Everything – prepared in advance, started through the plandemic and turned into a matter of life and death after the “war”. Everything – according to the plan for the technetronic era, in Newspeak – 4IR.
Second: not only does it matter which of the dogs will gain an advantage in this spectacle (which takes place in an imaginary battle mode with an arranged ending), but it matters the most. Putin has banned LGBT propaganda and is fighting the Western cabal, you know? Does it remind you of anyone? Donald Jab Trump. They are the saviors. And who is next to Donnie in his battle for humanity, as conservative support number one? The man who keeps saying that in the future, AI will physically merge with humans, and with his brain chips, “to avoid a terminator scenario.”
So we have literally a transhumanistic 4IR without LGBT and gender reassignment, wokism, a green deal – 4IR “with a human face”. This is Putin – the warm-up band for Donald Musk’s big concert.
For whom does it not matter whether there will be a gender change and wokism for the future of children, or not? Not for all conservative people in the world – for them this is of the utmost importance. That’s why we have anti-LGBT, anti-walke, transhumanists Vlad and Elon Trump.
They are, for conservative people, the solution to the problem of the terrible fourth industrial revolution of “depraved demonocrats”; they are industrial revolution 5.0 – the same as 4.0, but “for normal people”.
And the tale of the inner battle for the best dog that you tell (but not only you – this is the standard fairy tale told in the “more skeptical and critical alt-circles” – the Off-G circle, for example) is designed to prepare conservative circles for the upcoming prepared “global technology race”, but this time with brain chips and genetic editing, at the end of which this will be the reality in which future generations will grow up and live. This, in all likelihood, could include a spectacle of a “slightly hotter war” between global conservative heroes, through which the latest neurotechnologies (brain-computer interfaces, etc.) will be imposed. Cyborg soldiers will be the heroes of the new age, children will be crazy about them, and the future is sown.
What the article is saying is the the Eastern mafia families are merging with the Western mafia families so that there is just the one global mafia – this is nearly complete. But in the final stages of implementing that “multipolar” new world order, they are having internal battles to decide who will be top dog.
The article is rubbish – exactly the same old song with the same dragged out vague wording, repeated for the thousandth time by the “more critical alt-circles” and no concrete and up-to-date information to tell what this new world order really is. And Rollo (now – Rurik) is either a fool or a special operational alt-operation, but because of his unique status – together with Riley, who for three years repeats the same “vaccines, biometrics, CBDC”, updating their development (only on them, strictly limited), omitting all other hard transhumanistic developments in Russia – I would say that they are a special alt-operation to limit the debate, reduce the terrible transhumanist reality to pale technocracy and spread the illusion of real “battle for advantage between mafia dogs” (and other things). The entire “critical Off-G circle” is like that.
Now a new character is rising – someone 009, who repeats exactly the same limited and distorted fairy tale. Of-G published an article by him (which was immediately “shared” here and there on the net), on the same day Rollo and agent Yuri Rosca recommended him. fairy tale.
And in Russia they are already just talking about the future with brain chips and genetic editing is the only future reality and will start soon. – Not a word from Riley, not from Rolo (for whom there is no such thing as 4IR and a great reset with transhumanism), or from the rest of the Off-G circle, or from any other “critical alt-thinker” on the vast Internet.
A fairy tale, I’m telling you : D
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
[…] Fuente Expose […]
[…] OCTOBER 25, 2024 • […]
Hi Rhoda,
This may help to clear things up. David Icke speaks.
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=247727
https://tapnewswire.com/2024/10/29/satans-chosen-people-paul-craig-roberts/
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=297303
[…] – Multipolarism appears to be nothing more than the consolidation of globalism […]
Rolorurik says:
“Even the aesthetic choices are the same:
And what about this, also the same aesthetic solution? Where does this come from?
What happened there? What did they talk about, what did they show? What did Putin say? How did this coincide with an interview (and what, by the way, Putin said there)? Then how did things develop? And now where are we and what is going on? What’s next?….
Nothing – according to Rollo, Riley and all the other leaders of critical alt-thought. (I told you, a fairy tale.)
Three comments and… Expose put me in “Awaiting for approval”. Not they, no, “their algorithm”.
Oh, this one showed up. I challenge the allogorium to a duel (I can handle the machines!).
I’m right there with you on the whole globalist thing, but I take offence to you mentioning the soviet ‘revolution’ thing being run by ‘Jews’. There are Jews, Muslims and other religions in every walk of life, just as there are Christians, Buddhists and religious adherents, but it’s always Jews or Muslims that are ‘pointed out’ as being so??? Why on earth aren’t the many ‘Christian’ Banksters, Arms Dealers, Politicians labeled as such??? Seems rather biased to my mind.
[…] Al doilea a fost un articol pe care l -am publicat și anul trecut, intitulat ‘Multipolarismul pare să nu fie altceva decât consolidarea globalismului„, care este un rezumat al unui articol scris de Rolo Slavskiy în care susține că […]