Breaking News

Because of the “success” of covid, New Zealand has introduced a Gene Technology Bill

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


The dream of biotechnology, which promised a new age of health and human achievement, has become a nightmare, with its success stories being largely myths and its main beneficiaries being transnational corporations.

The covid-19 pandemic is viewed as the greatest success story of biotechnology, but it has also highlighted the risks and dangers of the industry, with the development of a deadly disease and a vaccine that has harmed many people.

This covid “success” has led to the New Zealand government introducing the Gene Technology Bill, which contains permissive legislation that favours transnational corporations and ignores public safety and environmental concerns.

The bill’s introduction is believed to be driven by trade negotiations with the US, which wants New Zealand to deregulate biotechnology to pave the way for similar deregulation in Europe.

Meanwhile, Australia already has a Gene Technology Regulator who has announced a project that is proposing to make gene-altered versions of the flu and then test out various genetic drugs and/or vaccines on human volunteers.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Waking Up From the Dream of Biotechnology

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

The dream of biotechnology is a new age of health, happiness and human achievement. James Watson, who discovered the double helix structure of DNA 70 years ago, was full of hope:

“We used to think that our fate was in our stars, but now we know that, in large measure, our fate is in our genes … recombinant DNA is likely the safest revolutionary technology ever developed, and we should not postpone experiments with clear benefits for fear of hypothetical risks … I want to see cancer cured in my lifetime,” Watson has enthused.

Watson is now in a nursing home aged 96 and cancer is not cured. In fact, it has become rampant. Somewhere along the way, did the dream of biotechnology become a nightmare? If so, it is time to wake up.

How Did We Get Here And What Does The Future Hold?

If you ask Google what are the biotechnology success stories, it comes up with slim pickings.

First up is a list of patented genetically engineered crops like cotton, soya and corn. These types are paired with proprietary pesticide products.

A March 2023 report from the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (“AMS”) says a consolidation trend within the agricultural seed industry began when the first genetically engineered traits were introduced to the market in the early 1990s. Since then, more than 200 US seed companies have been acquired or gone out of business. The result is a concentration of market share among four seed companies.

A June 2023 report by the USDA Economic Research Service (“ERS”) found that when combined, AgReliant, Bayer, Corteva and Syngenta accounted for 83% of corn seed sales and 78% of soyabean seed sales in the United States from 2018 to 2020. The trend is continuing, Bayer has just announced the consolidation of a further 10 regional seed brands in 2025. 

This so-called success story of biotechnology is not about more nutritious strains, increased yields, etc., these largely remain the stuff of myth. It is about the profits of transnational corporations that control a concentration of intellectual property (“IP”) in the form of patented genetics and traits. This has left farmers trapped in an unsustainable cycle of heightened input costs and depressed commodity prices. This is not a route for New Zealand farming to travel. Much of the allure of New Zealand produce is our pristine shores and clean green image. The genetically engineered (“GE”) route leads to corporate slavery, trade barriers, public rejection and rock bottom prices.

Next up on Google is a list of biotech startups that promise a lot, but do they deliver?

BiomassProtein is a Danish company that invented a process to turn grass into food. Like all such companies, they have required massive investment and government funding but have yet to turn any profit or generate public interest. The biomass industry wouldn’t be viable without renewable energy subsidies. In fact, biomass projects are not generally sustainable environmentally or economically. Worldwide, governments have so far invested over $48 billion subsidising the biomass industry, much of it related to the dubious application of climate-related tax credits.

As you go down any short list of biotechnology success stories, there is one feature that stands out above all else. The absolutely tremendous promise, and “promise is the operative word.

For 70 years, since Watson and Crick’s discovery, a lot of promises have been made and a lot of water has flowed under the bridge without actually generating any power. As we have reported on many occasions, you can make money in biotechnology by promising a lot, whether you deliver or not is largely immaterial. Along the way, government grants, speculative investment and intellectual property sales can make you into a multimillionaire without actually achieving, curing or selling anything.

Third on Google’s list is Fibrotech Therapeutics, an Australian company sold for $75 million in 2019 after “promising” phase 1 trials of a product to treat diabetic nephropathy. No further updates are available.

So where does this all go to?

There is only one answer to this question, and it is on everyone’s lips – covid-19. Covid-19 is THE great success story of biotechnology. Not only is it possible to create a totally new deadly disease but also share it through a crack in the laboratory door with the entire world’s population. And it doesn’t stop there, you can also create, sell and profit from a vaccine which doesn’t work and actually harms a great many people. There is no liability whatsoever if you do so, even if you harm the economy. Learned papers have been written documenting the financial costs of the pandemic rated in hundreds of trillions of dollars and the human cost estimated to top 15-30 million excess deaths worldwide. If this hasn’t dampened your enthusiasm for biotechnology probably nothing will.

It is in this last category that the New Zealand government falls. It has introduced the Gene Technology Bill which contains by far the most permissive legislation of any country in the world. At last New Zealand really is leading the world (perhaps in cupidity and stupidity). Its clauses contain all the pips and whistles most needed by transnational corporates – no criminal or civil liability for facilitators, no labelling of products, foods, medicines required (the public won’t even know), provision for government-mandated approval (yes, it has that magic word “mandate” which is music to the corporate ears), ability to fiddle to your heart’s content with the DNA of animals, microbes plants, adults and children, no messy ethics, public watchdogs or testing requirements – simply apply to the one-stop regulator for a rubber stamp.

What Will Happen To Us?

A quick look across the ditch to Australia reveals they already have a Gene Technology Regulator. Dr Raj Bhula. He has announced that a period of 30 days of public submissions will be held starting in March before the probable approval of the release of genetically engineered mosquitoes in Queensland.

It doesn’t stop there, the idea of experimenting on Australians is catching on fast. Incredibly, Bhula’s office has just rated the following project at the Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, as posing “negligible to moderate risk to human health and safety.”

“The initial aim is to evaluate the safety and infectivity of recombinant seasonal human influenza viruses in healthy volunteers. These GM [genetically modified] viruses will then be used to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drugs or vaccine candidates to prevent and control influenza infection.”

The laboratory is proposing to make gene-altered versions of the flu and then test out various genetic drugs and/or vaccines on human volunteers over a five-year period. Given the low-risk rating by the regulator, the project, which creates new viruses, is likely to be a shoo-in for a rubber stamp. Does any of this sound at all familiar? It should.

Why Is Our Government Deregulating Biotechnology At A Time When The Significant Serious Risks Are Becoming Glaringly Obvious Even To Children?

A little bird has told us the answer to this and it might be surprising – trade negotiations.

The powers that be in the US have apparently decided to follow up on the massive profits that their pharmaceutical companies made during the pandemic by asking little New Zealand to deregulate biotechnology. I am not sure “ask” is the right word but it is the polite term when it comes to trade diplomacy.

In a rush of enthusiasm, our Coalition government is eager to comply and damn the consequences. If we give in, we will be providing a helping hand to our “friends” in America who will then toddle off to Europe and ask them to follow suit. “See, New Zealand did it, now it’s your turn.” And if there are any projects that the American public, protected as they, fortunately, are by constitutional rights, believe to be a bridge too far, then New Zealand can step into the breach and pollute our hitherto pristine shores and clean green fields for them. There is a big payday involved for someone, but not for the farmers or the honest Kiwi public.

There are a lot of reasons to reject the Gene Technology Bill. Find out more by viewing our YouTube video ‘The Gene Technology Bill. What Kiwis Need To Know’ and then make a submission to the Health Select Committee by 17 February. We have published suggestions for a submission template.

Write to your Member of [the New Zealand] Parliament. They need to be quizzed on this egregious Bill. They are trying to get this fast-tracked during the holidays. We do not live in a country where people are willing to let others take away their food choices and increase exposure to serious long-term environmental and health risks.

About the Author

Guy Hatchard, PhD, is a New Zealander who was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). 

You can subscribe to Dr. Hatchard’s websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology.  You can also follow Dr. Hatchard on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clayton
Clayton
7 months ago

Lockstep

christine.257
christine.257
7 months ago

.The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetrically-modified and not naturally occurring – that means that The Depatment Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy “vaccines” Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your “genetic code” making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life” and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a “Trans Human”.
A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights – but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them.
Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medicel treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said “should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)” and which “Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)” – but why?
Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA
Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023).
The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna – which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013
My question then is: “If” natural mRNA DNA opens the door to Heaven – what door does the Laboratory created and patented cDNA (Synthetic DNA) open instead, after you die?
No, I am not cDNA vaccinated and I remain Human with my natural DNA mRNA – the above from articles I copied from “Christine.257’s free Substack” where they and many others, were recorded.
Which raises another question – this was an Army initiative which has been in the planning for many years previously and is now “Classified”, but the goals have been reached and with the advent of Robots in 2025, which will replace many Human jobs and methods of employment, given the overall expenditure in bonuses for meeting vaccinated targets, from hidden slush funds, in the millions or billions, set aside for that purpose – would you just, when all is said and done and the ultimate prize won, just sit back and do nothing – or continue with the disposal of the Covid vaccinated Human Rubbish in The Great Reset, as was originally intended after 2019/2020?
With the above vaccines distributed globally and into countries under different trade names including Russia, India and China, it is the Army who one day will probably oversee The Great Reset and the final outcome, putting the Army in final total control of all who remain, not vaccinated, or, for the sake of argument, the New Elite, managed by Robots and automation, with all Human Rubbish who volunteered their bodies, successfully disposed of.
My point of reference – Steve Kirsch’s “Substack” and his Million US Dollar Competition for you to prove that vaccines work – his contention is they don’t and he can prove it.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] New Zealand government has proposed the Gene Technology Bill in response to this so-called […]

Glastian
Glastian
7 months ago

Re cancer. In 1931, almost 100 years ago, Dr Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work in discovering the cause of cancer. Put simply, he found that cancer is anaerobic and cannot survive in an alkali environment, i.e. in a pH of more than 7.0; an acidic pH of say, 5.0 or less invites all sorts of illnesses, not just cancer. Also, importantly, blood oxygen should be maintained at over 93%. It must follow then, surely, that a body’s healthy immune system would ideally have a pH of over 7.0, and an oxygen content of near 100% as possible? So should treatment of cancer be more diet orientated to achieve and maintain healthy pH and oxygen levels, thus keeping the body in a balanced state? Oxygen levels can be measured by oxymeters (placed on the finger), pH can be measured by sampling saliva using pH strips.
Given that Dr Warburg’s findings were in 1931, the obvious question would seem to be why have his findings not been followed up and expanded upon? Surely it can’t be that old chestnut; the threat to Big Pharma’s profits? Only my opinion!

Clayton
Clayton
Reply to  Glastian
7 months ago

your on the right path for ( normal cancer ) hasn’t been proven for “turbo cancer “ yet

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Joy N.
Joy N.
7 months ago

🙏🙏The year 2025 has just begun, yet disturbing news continues to dominate headlines around the world. This suggests that Bible prophecy is rapidly progressing toward its fulfillment & the time to escape is very short. To learn more, please visit https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/

SuziAlkamyst
SuziAlkamyst
7 months ago

It’s time for the people of New Zealand to wake up and get rid of their corrupt politicians who are all too obviously on the pay role of pharma and tech corps. As is the case in too many countries of the world!

John
John
Reply to  SuziAlkamyst
7 months ago

If they are anything like over here than they will give it a standing ovation and a ticker parade.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] –  Because of the “success” of covid, New Zealand has introduced a Gene Technology Bill […]