|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Economist William Nordhaus once calculated that our ancestors spent approximately 58 hours of labour to generate the same amount of light that’s now produced by a modern lightbulb in an instant. By the 1700s, oil lamps cut that figure to five hours of work for one hour of usable light. A significant jump in productivity, but activities like working or reading at night were still reserved for the wealthy.
Today, a single hour of work buys decades of light. The jump has been staggering. In money terms, the price of lighting has fallen 14,000-fold since the 1300s – an hour of light today costs well under a second of labour. That’s what productivity looks like.
And yet, even this enormous leap may pale compared to what’s coming. Artificial intelligence promises to do for productivity what electricity, the steam engine and the light bulb once did. Except this time, it will be faster, broader and even more disruptive. Some researchers believe AI will propel us into prosperity so vast we can barely imagine it. Others warn it could end the story altogether. Alarmingly, a survey of key AI researchers returned a 5% chance that superintelligence could wipe us out entirely. That’s a one-in-twenty chance that its development will trigger “extremely bad outcomes, including human extinction”.
The paradox is fascinating. Artificial intelligence may be the invention that frees us from drudgery forevermore – or it could be our final mistake.
Wellbeing is About Productivity
It’s not just about whether robots take over the world. What comes next with AI is more about how it boosts productivity and alters our economy, and ultimately whether it improves human wellbeing.
For Andrew Leigh – economist, Australian MP, and the author of The Shortest History of Economics – the story of light is about the improvement in quality of life, not about money. “Economics is no more about money than architecture is about feet and inches… it’s the study of wellbeing; money is just the yardstick.”
The bee that adorns his book’s cover symbolises industry and cooperation, which he identifies as the essence of modern economies. Just as no bee builds a hive alone, no person or country thrives without trade, specialisation and collaboration.
Part of the incoming revolution is about the continuation of global cooperation, and part is about the inevitable boom in productivity. But it all comes with warnings.
Stagnation Then Explosion: Are We Ready?
Estimates by the Maddison Project show that Japan’s average real income remained unchanged for seven whole centuries between year 1000 to 1700. Generations lived under the same economic ceiling, and people were born, raised and died in a world where nothing improved for anyone.
Suddenly, the Industrial Revolution in Britain changed the world. Living standards doubled in a single lifetime, and the expectation that your children would live a better life than you became the new normal. The revolution is what ended the centuries-long trance of economic stagnation.
Despite what many think, the escalator has slowed in recent decades. In the US, intergenerational income mobility – the belief that children would earn more than their parents – was at 90% for those born in 1940, and is now less than 50% for people born in 1980. The conveyor belt of generational upgrades is grinding towards a halt. In steps AI, not as a marginal improvement, but as a potential turbocharger, just like the Industrial Revolution.
Promise and Peril of AI
Today, we’re at a fork in history’s road. Leigh tells us that “artificial intelligence now has the chance to do for us what electricity, the steam engine and lighting did for previous generations” – quantum leaps for living standards – “AI has massive potential and the likeliest case is it delivers prosperity levels we can barely imagine right now”
Meanwhile, mathematicians and philosophers call AI’s perils “existential for a reason”. In a 2023-2024 survey of more than 2,700 AI researchers, the median estimate assigned a 5% chance to extremely bad outcomes – including human extinction. For some, it seems low. But in real terms: would you get on a plane with a 5% chance of crashing?
We built regulations for planes and bridges after they fell from the sky, or crumbled. AI is different; its sheer power demands the guardrails are built before the highway opens. The scale of risk, disruption and potential is phenomenal.
Who Wins in the AI Race?
AI might be the greatest productivity engine yet, but who gets the gains? Leigh cautions that it depends on policy: “Competition laws must prevent monopolies in artificial intelligence. Think of internet search: once sprawling, now nearly monopolised. AI could follow that path unless stopped.”
The UK’s Digital Markets Act and similar proposals elsewhere aim to designate mega-platforms as “gatekeepers” who become subject to stricter rules. Because power unchallenged often turns into capture, and capture turns innovation into exclusion. Regulation, says Leigh, is not about choking innovation, but rather allowing it to breathe.
Future Generations: Education in the Age of AI
Should we bother teaching kids to read the classics, or instead be training them to prompt AI effectively? It’s somewhere in the middle. Our predecessors insisted it was essential to read a physical map or do mental mathematics, not knowing that Google Maps would remove the need and we’d carry calculators in our pockets our whole lives.
Leigh argues both sides. Thinking about London’s legendary black cab drivers who need to memorise 25,000 city streets in order to pass “the Knowledge” (even in 2025 with GPS services available) is one way to consider how we may go forwards despite having AI that could do a lot of thinking for us. Studies show the mental maps that the drivers’ brains developed have lasting cognitive benefits that improve functionality far beyond just navigation.
In the school system, should we still be getting students to read novels and academic papers, when AI models can instantly read a thousand and summarise the key points? Why read Pride and Prejudice if ChatGPT can tell you the main themes and draft an essay in seconds? Reading it ourselves and pondering nuance, context and empathy is what keeps us human, and the exercise is about more than simply getting to a logical conclusion.
Even if artificial intelligence can summarise whole libraries in seconds, the act of reading still trains the mind in ways machines can’t replicate. Education, Leigh insists, must preserve critical thinking and rigour, otherwise we risk losing the ability to identify when it produces something not quite right.
Global Competition, Local Changes
The AI race feels like a game of superpowers with the top few companies either dominating progress themselves, or using their capital to hoover up promising start-ups and their engineers. However, it’s not only about who produces the models and from where, but also about how the technology is utilised.
For example, in Australia where the big language models and data centres are not being built, they are already seeing huge gains. Law companies, insurance, coding, design – firms everywhere are unlocking faster, smarter services behind the scenes, which improve productivity and quality of life in small, but noticeable, doses.
We are destined for another labour market shift just like with every other major revolution. Some jobs will vanish; new ones will be created. At least that’s the idea. Will humanity benefit overall, or will the gains accrue to asset holders and algorithm owners, further worsening the current state of wealth inequality in the world?
Inequality: An Old Story with a New Twist
Thomas Pikkety’s “r > g” warns us that when returns on capital (r) exceed economic growth (g), inequality grows. So, if assets appreciate at a greater rate than the economy itself, the wealthier pull further away from wage earners. Adding to this, the gap between high- and low-paid workers has widened in many major countries too.
With AI exponentially improving productivity, we can imagine two very different futures in terms of wealth inequality. The trend will either be reversed or reinforced. If AI is utilised to lift GDP growth, and if that growth reaches wages and public services rather than just shareholders and those already rich, then inequality will shrink. But, if benefits are limited to capital holders, the divide itself will grow exponentially.
Final Thought
From candlelight to electric glow, and from centuries of economic stasis to explosive innovation, economics is always about how humanity adapts and innovates. AI looks like it will be the most transformative yet. Perhaps it will bring an age of unimaginable abundance, or end the game once and for all. In the meantime, the clock continues ticking on who will see the upside, and whether we can build the necessary safety measures in time.
Join the Conversation
Will AI be humanity’s greatest ally, or its final folly? What will happen with regulation and the education system? We’re undeniably at a critical crossroads in our history. Add your thoughts below.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Did You Know?, World News
AI certainly is not the magic bullet that its developers would like us to believe it to be:
This also doesn’t even begin to address any of the legal, ethical or alignment issues we’re now facing with AI.
In addition, this article’s reference to light and energy are particularly apropos (and ironic) in light of the fact that AI is already proving to be an environmental catastrophe..
For all these reasons, and many more, we need to take a long, hard look at our use of AI and our growing reliance upon it, because the more you know, the less trusting you will be.
AI is a tool which can be used for good or evil and will be. A study of the innate traits, and history of species Homo sapiens leads to a pessimistic attitude in this regard.
‘Quality of life’ or ‘well-being’ based on money is insecure rubbish compared to that based on ethical values requiring thought.
‘AI’ is information, not intelligence, so cannot think or comprehend life’s continuum; vast amount of data missed, out of context corrupt, productive of lies.
Unregulated lying dumb machines regulate people, train to parrot lies, run faster in Satnav’s ever-decreasing circles of triage, be headless chickens clueless that utility bills etc lie.
None the wiser fit mindless digital ghetto-gulag for use as pawns, with no ethical consideration or risk of rebellion.
Hi Myme,
That’s exactly what the article is about, and Leigh’s point in his interview. It’s nothing to do with money itself, and economics is more to do with how well people can live rather than the numerical figures.
So, are you neither concerned nor optimistic about the possible risks/potential of AI being implemented in society, if you think it’s just a bunch of dumb machines? Happy to hear your thoughts on the topic.
G Calder
Sorry, I clicked on wrong one of your posts. My reply to you is further down the page
Such a tittle means that you don’t know so many things about this subject, imho.
Hi PAM,
I’m not sure what you mean, as it is a quote from the Leigh interview. As you can tell from the article, this isn’t about AI itself such as how it works, but rather the economic risks and potential. It also questions whether maybe, the real affects may actually be from the way it improves or reduces our quality of life, rather than the overhaul by robots that many are concerned about.
Happy to hear your thoughts on the topic,
G Calder
Hi
My comment was to support the article by giving further examples that are now happening.
I think is no ‘either or answer’ to your question; it will vastly benefit pockets of those controlling it, destroy and make miserable those subjected to it but not ‘groomed’ by it and, leave those ‘groomed’ by it clueless of how badly they are being treated by those controlling it and thence them.
All of what you presented can be answered in revelation 13. AI will be part of the beast system of control. The dynamics of humanity and culture is explained by the four horsemen in that same book. We are headed in that direction, as one famous person stated, at “Warp Speed ” Hold onto your tailgate! It’s going to get rough!
Especially, AI can be programmed to decimate “All Polluters of This Earth”.
Or, by then, human would be also “Useless Eaters” too.
Someone needs to program the top dog AI computer to “Never Try To Decimate Human!”
Hi G Calder,
This is what I know, about where I live in the UK.
Industry is being closed down, the Coal mines have been closed, the Steel works have been closed, the local Pubs and Clubs have closed, Police stations have closed, and now Churches are being closed.
All this started to happen long before AI.
So I would blame our Politicians, Our dual passport MP’s.
AI is lame if you think for yourself !
AI is a corrupt tool appropriated by governments to manipulate the public to further their interests and agenda.
The faith in AI is stunning but really it dumbs down society. For example, look at the publication of sales descriptions, there isn’t any variation in the sound or delivery. Or the act of making ice cream is lost because the operator fails to appreciate how to make good ice cream with basic machine manual operation control.
Oh Pshaw!! AI is just another detestable fad that will die as ignominiously as it should because it is boring and uninspiring at best, socially destructive and mind numbing at worst. A brain washing persuasion device devised by the WEF Set to dumb down the gullible masses and feed them a steady diet of fantasy and irrelevance. Plaster of Paris cupcakes are better than AI, and a blowfly larvae sandwich is better than WEF.
No bee builds a hive by itself? 90% of bee species do NOT live in colonies or hives, so this fella is clearly not that bright. Many of us do not think of ourselves as part of society, loathe the phrase, the common good, we operate in small trusted groups with a varied skill base. We aren’t drones like the government think, although after the convid hoax I realised that most people are dim.