Breaking News

New Study published by top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against Humanity

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

During the last twenty months, we have been subjected to rules and restrictions that have adversely changed the lives of many in society. These measures have been carefully constructed by the government aided by the advice of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). Their advice has ensured that the fear and propaganda are of optimum effect to terrify the public into complying with their nonsensical, disproportionate, and more importantly harmful rules.

Rational, critical thinking has been frowned upon and evidence opposing the government narrative has been censored, in a modern-day “burning of the books” with the authors dismissed as conspiracy theorists. These experts in various fields, including health, medicine, politics, and the social sciences must have a platform to provide the much-needed evidence to the people of what is actually happening in the world under the guise of a “pandemic.”

We at the Expose are in a fortunate position to provide that platform and can share the views that we will not hear on the mainstream media. Today we are very fortunate to have been given permission by a top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his field, to share his detailed article, which is an analysis of the virology responsible for each step of the “pandemic” agenda.  


FRAUD and Crimes Against Humanity Enabled by Virology’s Unscientific Self-Referential Scientism, By A Biomedical Scientist

Virology’s Voodoo Scientism Is Not Real Science

The purported novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has not been proven to exist in nature and has not been established as the cause of “COVID-19”, the pandemic disease concocted by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Likewise, there are no variants of the “virus”, which also only exist hypothetically in computers, and in online gene banks.

This COVID-19 fraud has enabled the widespread use of highly experimental and dangerous injections that contain a computer-generated spike protein mRNA sequence that instructs the body to poison itself. These injections also contain undeclared non-biological substances for unknown purposes and are killing many thousands of people worldwide and seriously harming many more.

Virological fraud enables these crimes against humanity because SARS-CoV-2 has never been physically isolated or shown to be the causal agent of COVID-19.

The genome of a “virus” that hadn’t been isolated and purified, was published in early January 2020, named SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses on 11 February, the same day the WHO’s Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, announced its supposed resultant disease (COVID-19) with symptoms that are indistinguishable from other respiratory diseases.

The vast majority of the public and the medical profession are unaware that modern virology uses anti-scientific methods to claim the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus as well as other viruses. Most people would be surprised to learn that the “virus” has never been found inside a human or shown to be the cause of any disease.

The COVID-19 fraud requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the computer-generated genome can be cross-checked.

Virology’s double deception is as follows:

1) The substitution of the dictionary and scientific meaning of the noun isolate for the opposite meaning. Isolate (real definition): Chemistry, Bacteriology. to obtain (a substance or microorganism) in an uncombined or pure state.

2) The substitution of the proxy of inducing cytopathic effects (CPEs) by inoculating abnormal cell lines in vitro for the established proxy of infecting a non-diseased host in vivo to determine causality between the proposed pathogen and the disease.

Even using “normal” healthy cell lines would not establish causality by Koch’s postulates or any other scientific postulates used to establish causality, because they are only in vitro observations involving alleged viruses.

The production of CPEs is central to modern virology’s fraudulent claims of isolation and pathogenicity: a sample (e.g. a nasal swab) is taken from a person and added to some cells in a test tube, if the cells die, it is falsely declared that a virus has been “isolated”.

By definition, a virus is an infectious particle that can cause a disease in a living host. None of these defining properties have been demonstrated in any of the virological experiments describing supposed isolation and pathogenesis.

Virologists spent several decades attempting this unsuccessfully but instead of admitting to a problem with the whole virus theory, they just changed the meaning of the word isolate in the 1950s. Virologists do not actually isolate viruses, they just falsely claim that they do.

The process virologists use to claim “isolation” can be summarised as follows:

From the mixed biological “soup” taken from a patient’s lungs or nose swabs containing all sorts of material including human cells, innumerable commensal microbes, and potential contaminants (bacteria, fungi), de novo assembly platforms search for short genetic fragments. After finding millions of unique fragments in the soup, the software programmes then piece together one long piece (a “genome”) based on parameters set in the programme. There is some cutting-and-pasting of sequences and if pieces are “missing” other ready-made templates can be added to fill the gaps. The man-made algorithms, probability models and arbitrary selections cannot determine its physical existence in nature, because any coronavirus “genome” used as a template in its production will also be hypothetical.

This methodology provides no confirmable connection with the material or physical world, which makes the newest member of the Coronavirus genus just another product of virology’s self-referential processes. This is how virologists keep inventing viruses to stay in business, providing pharmaceutical companies with the justification for producing lucrative vaccines.

The anti-science of virology and the perversion of the word “isolation” is delusional, dishonest and highly misleading. It is not a sound basis for the health and well-being of individuals or whole populations.

Fan Wu et al. were the first inventors of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and used a patient’s lung fluid sample for de novo sequencing assembly platform analysis to search for short genetic fragments or “reads”. It is important to understand that the samples sequenced were not physically isolated viruses but crude samples containing millions of genetic fragments from the patient himself, and the numerous different microbes (bacteria, fungi) that make up the microbiome, as well as potential environmental contaminants.

It’s not clear how Fan Wu et al. knew which “genome” to choose when all of the options were hypothetical computer constructs, but they chose the longest (30,474 nucleotides), because it had a nucleotide identity of 89.1% with the in silico (computer-generated) bat coronavirus genome (SL-CoVZC45) that was invented in 2018. It was subsequently reduced to 29,875 nucleotides in the next version on GenBank perhaps to make it look more like the 29,802 nucleotides of the bat model genome. The final model was redrawn with a completely different terminal sequence featuring 23 consecutive adenine bases, thereby making it look more like the bat model which featured 26 consecutive adenine bases on its tail.

On the basis that RNA of unknown origin was part of the culture in which many cells died (perhaps due to induced starvation and stress with cytotoxic substances), Fan Wu et al claimed that they had successfully isolated the 2019-nCoV BetaCov virus.

This fraud was rewarded with grants in 2020 totalling US$900,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation made to the two institutions with which 14 of the 19 co-authors of the fraudulent paper were affiliated.

Peng Zhou et al. then made their contribution to the fraud by publishing a paper that fulfilled none of the postulates to identify a virus or confirm it as being causative of any disease. The supposed virus was not physically isolated and purified for biochemical characterisation and so remains entirely theoretical.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences, with which 24 of the 27 co-authors were affiliated, were rewarded with a 2020 COVID-19-related grant totalling US$359,820 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Na Zhu et al. also claimed isolation of the virus, but it is clear that the authors do not mean “isolation” in the dictionary scientifically postulated sense but virology’s substituted antonymic meaning and the substitution of diseased for non-diseased host cells to establish causality between a purported virus and the patient’s symptoms.

Unlike Fan Wu et al. and Peng Zhou et al., Na Zhu et al. did produce images of what they called “2019-nCoV particles” but without any verification of their biochemical composition from a purified specimen. It is not possible to establish from their images that the particles are infectious disease-causing viruses or that they contain the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome.

“Although our study does not fulfil Koch’s postulates, our analyses provide evidence of implicating 2019-nCoV in the Wuhan outbreak.” Na Zhu et al

This claim is based on pictures of extracellular vesicles of unknown composition and origin which the authors have named “2019-nCoV”.

The National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, with which 13 of the 18 co-authors of the Na Zhu et al paper were affiliated were rewarded with US$71,700 in 2020 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for this fraudulent research.

Caly et al. claimed that Vero cells (monkey kidney cells)“showed cytoplasmic membrane-bound vesicles containing coronavirus particles”, but were not able to see typical “virions” with the spike protein. They added more protein-digesting trypsin to the cell cultures which digested the outer protein layer of a 100 nm spherical “virion” to manufacture “the characteristic crown-like fringe of spike proteins”, thereby they “immediately improved virion morphology.” In other words, when the vesicles (possibly exosomes) did not look like their expectations of a coronavirus, they artificially engineered it with an extra-large dose of the enzyme trypsin.

These supposed virions were not purified so their biochemical composition could not be confirmed. The “genome” was in fact put together after generating “approximately 30,000,000 reads” from the tissue culture mix. As with all other papers of this nature, no explanation was provided as to how these particles are known to cause disease or whether these same particles exist inside humans. Scientifically speaking they can only be called extracellular vesicles of unknown significance, produced by stressed abnormal monkey kidney cells in vitro.

Despite the deceptions permeating virology, virologists still adhere to their non-scientific beliefs. This is scientism not science.

Scientism is the uncritical application of technical methods which becomes a secularised belief system relying for its authority on its own presupposition and performativity. Assumptions, hypotheses and abstractions are considered to be conclusive and real.

In contrast, the scientific method includes the following:

1) Objective observation: Measurement and data.

2) Evidence.

3) Experiment and/or observation as benchmarks for testing hypotheses.

4) Induction: reasoning to establish general rules or conclusions drawn from facts or examples.

5) Repetition.

6) Critical analysis.

7) Verification and testing: critical exposure to scrutiny, peer review and assessment.

Virologists claim that they have elucidated the entire genomes of viruses such as “SARS-CoV-2” and they upload this onto databanks. They claim that they have an “isolate” of the virus but this is declared after they have constructed the genome from their mixed brew containing genetic fragments of unknown origin using computer algorithms.

Virologists do not work with a complete genome because they do not work with a complete virus. They work with random bits of biological material and then claim that it constitutes evidence of a virus. When their experiments are examined carefully there is no material proof of a virus.

No virus called SARS-CoV-2 has ever been properly isolated and purified as a whole unique structure. What happens is the shotgun sequencing of crude samples that contain numerous mixed genetic fragments of unknown origin. Shotgun sequencing is a method used for sequencing random DNA strands which is named by analogy with the semi-random shot grouping of a shotgun. There is no evidence whatsoever that the resulting in silico “genome” actually exists in nature or has anything to do with a “virus”. The invention of the “virus” is presented as a discovery, its faux status is secured through the act of naming it into existence.

The PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) can only amplify selected nucleotide sequences but cannot determine their provenance or significance. The Virology PCR fraud relies on the attribution of meaning to the amplified sequences:

1) Reference to the imaginary in silico genome but not to a proven physical entity called SARS-CoV-2.

2) Reference to a “disease” that with absurd circular reasoning has been defined by the PCR result itself.

The faudsters disingenuously refer to the PCR as the “gold standard” test but in reality, at best it is merely a surrogate test for a whole virion and at worse, it is a false positive artifact generating test.

When PCR is performed badly and/or at high cycle numbers (as has been common) the target sequence may not even be present in the sample and a “positive” result is simply an artefact of the PCR process. The PCR cannot diagnose the infectious status of a person in any proven way and no consistent link has ever been found between a disease state and the PCR results.

The misapplication of a completely inaccurate PCR means that COVID-19 is a scientifically meaningless construct that is nothing more than a self-referential illusion.

Christian Drosten et al. published non-peer reviewed PCR assay sequences designed to detect the purported virus “without having virus material available” in January 2020.

The Drosten paper was published in Eurosurveillance on 23 January which was only two days after submitting the manuscript. Drosten who is facing charges for holding a fraudulent doctoral title did not declare that he was a member of the Eurosurveillance editorial board.

Chantal Reusken a co-author, also failed to declare that she was on the Eurosurveillance editorial board. Olfert Landt another of Drosten’s co-authors who is CEO of TIB the maker of a lucrative PCR kit based on the published assay sequences didnt declare his conflict of interest until 29 July 2020.

Mass PCR testing using the Drosten protocol quickly resulted not in a viral pandemic but a PCR pandemic. The university

hospital of Charité Berlin where many of the Drosten PCR authors were based subsequently received a 2020 “covid” grant totalling US$249,550.70.

The PCR has been designed to detect genetic sequences

of a “virus” that has not been proven to exist in nature but instead is detecting sequences of unknown origin and generates high numbers of false positive results.

As a result of PCR testing, medical tyranny has been imposed on most of the world, based on scientism disconnected from the real world and so absurd that detecting a few genetic fragments of something in one person can be used as the excuse to lock up an entire country.

The completely useless PCR test generated astronomical case numbers which then formed the basis of “COVID-19” outbreak computer models. Outbreak modelling is notorious for its inaccurace predictions and produced “COVID-19” numbers that were preposterous and all based on worthless numbers.

Lockdown flouting Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London (ICL) has a long history of producing doom mongering wildly inaccurate speculative nonsense with his computer modelling.

In 2001, the ICL team did the modelling on foot and mouth disease which led to a cull of six million sheep, pigs and cattle costing the UK approximately £10 billion. The ICL work on this has been described as ‘severely flawed’ by real experts.

In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from mad cow disease which he claimed could rise to 150,000 if sheep were involved. In the UK, the total number of deaths was 177.

In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people could be killed by bird flu. The total number of deaths was 282 worldwide.

In 2009, Ferguson and the ICL team claimed that swine flu would kill 65,000 people in the UK. In reality, swine flu killed 457 people in the UK.

Ferguson was the lead author of an ICL Report, published without peer review on 16 March 2021, predicting that 550,000 people in the UK and 2.2 million people in the US would die from COVID-19 within approximately three months.

When the Ferguson reports programming was eventually released for public scrutiny it was ridiculed by academic experts. It relied on 13-year-old computer coding intended to model flu which was a “buggy mess that looks more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming” according to one expert. Scientists at the University of Edinburgh reported that it failed “the basic scientific test of producing the same results given the same initial set of parameters”.

The ICL was rewarded with Gates Foundation grants for 2020 totalling US$91,494,791. Since 2002 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have provided ICL with grants totalling US$302,164,640, which is US$16,000,000 per year for the last 19 years.

Inaccurate computer models based on false case numbers have resulted in fear and confusion leading to heated debates about why the “virus” behaves so differently in different places, whether or not there is excess mortality, and whether or not the “vaccines” are effective.

The aggressively marketed remedy for this alleged deadly virus is a spike protein produced by a genetic sequence that is not found in nature but in a US patent from 2007. The “vaccines” based on this sequence have killed many thousands of people around the world and injured millions more.

If these anti-science methods continue to be believed and accepted, we are likely to see even more pseudo pandemics requiring more “vaccines”, continuing indefinitely as part of the “new normal”. We are already seeing this with a steady stream of “variants of concern.”

There is nothing normal about the pharmaceutical industry and globalist organisations creating demand for unnecessary gene therapies through fear and the creation of pseudo-pandemics. There is nothing normal about the unprecedented censorship of scientific debate and the prevention of medical practitioners providing real advice and informed consent.

The virus isolation fraud, the artificial viral genome fraud (including new variants), the pathogenicity fraud, the PCR fraud, and the experimental gene therapy “vaccine” fraud are crimes against humanity enabled by virology’s unscientific self-referential scientism.

References

1 Fan Wu et al. “A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China”, Nature, Vol 579 (3 Feb 2020).

2 Peng Zhou et al. “A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin”, Nature, 579 (12 Mar 2020).

3 Na Zhu et al. “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 382 (20 Feb 2020).

4 Leon Caly et al. “Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia”, MJA, 212/10 (1 Jun 2020).

5 Victor M Corman, Christian Drosten et al “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”, Eurosurveillance, 25/3 (23 Jan 2020).

6 THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith

7) Covid-19: Exposing the Lies. Dr Vernon Coleman

Share this page to Telegram
5 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
145 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SHARON
SHARON
5 months ago

HOW MANY MORE EXPERTS NEED TO PUT THIS OUT BEFORE PEOPLE WAKE UP WORLD WIDE CORRUPTION AND LIES DESTROYING OUR LIVES AND OUR CHILDREN WE ARE THE MANY DO NOT OBAY ONLY WE CAN STOP THIS DEATHS DISABILITIES THE ITS NOT ABOUT HEALTH ITS ABOUT MAKING YOU A SLAVE

Barbara Young
Barbara Young
Reply to  SHARON
5 months ago

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 5 months ago by Barbara Young
Doug
Doug
Reply to  Barbara Young
5 months ago

You’re a pretty sad excuse for a human being!

Chris
Chris
Reply to  SHARON
5 months ago

Probably a lot. I have tried so many times to re-educate my vaxxer friends by sending them various articles that outline the deception & fraud but they probably do not even read them. They are so trusting of the government but now I wonder if it is also a case of ‘In for a penny, in for a pound’.

dc3009
dc3009
Reply to  SHARON
5 months ago

SADLY,,, we are no longer the many!!! The devil has stabbed their poison into the majority, who will now be enslaved within the “New Normal World Order!”
Human freedom is losing the battle against the elitist agenda. There is only one solution to overcome this “Final Solution,” that being an antidote to the poison … If someone were to announce they have an antidote, the majority of the jabbed will queue up for it and help take back our lives.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  dc3009
5 months ago

‘Doctor Finds Treatment For Vaxx Victims, Sees Major Improvement in Blood!’https://rumble.com/vq4jmr-doc-finds-therapy-for-vaxxed-blood-doctor-has-seen-improvement-in-vaxxed-pa.html

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  SHARON
5 months ago

Print it and distribute. Maybe then.

Steve
Steve
5 months ago

Can we make this shareable on instagram, as im currently on 30 day facebook ban for sharing the proof of the deception from the expose e mails, they wont even allow me to share with friends on messenger. Slowly friends and family are taking note, and doing their own research. Some now wont have the booster jabs, although many are still rushing to fall on the needle. Does anyone have advise where to share to get the word out.

not sure
not sure
Reply to  Steve
5 months ago

You realize Instagram is owned by Facebook, right? They don’t want you there. Why are you there? You may need to connect with friends and family through some other medium where your voice isn’t muffled by the boot on your neck.

Eva Bird
Eva Bird
Reply to  Steve
5 months ago

I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

 This is where i started… http://Www.WorkJoin1.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Eva Bird
Eddie
Eddie
Reply to  Steve
5 months ago

Use Telegram..censorshp free

ForestWalk
ForestWalk
Reply to  Eddie
4 months ago

Telegram is less restrictive, but not censorship free. I am banned from posting on public groups on Telegram, simply because I pasted some important links about “Covid” into various public groups on Telegram.

Davide
Davide
Reply to  Steve
5 months ago

get the email addresses of your facebook contact and reach them via email

trackback
5 months ago

[…] December 3, 2021New Study published by top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against… […]

Gareth Hawker
Gareth Hawker
5 months ago

Who is the “top British Biomedical scientist”?

Not publishing his name and credentials reduces the credibility of his article.

LadyT
LadyT
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
5 months ago

Its a disgrace that those who tell the truth these days suffer consequences to varying degrees, im guessing in their position those consequences would be harsh. So remaining anonymous is understandable.
It says something about the world we live in now, that anyone speaking out from the science field against cult covid is demonised.

The fact is though, thanks to this scientist and others like him, we’re still able to have a better understanding of the lies that we may have previously only suspected

Schurdak6
Schurdak6
Reply to  Gareth Hawker
5 months ago

Exactly!!! Who wrote this? It’s worthless without the author’s name!!!

EADOman
EADOman
Reply to  Schurdak6
5 months ago

Perhaps the author cannot afford to be black balled by the medical industrial complex

Arby
Arby
Reply to  EADOman
5 months ago

If your life or the lives of your family members are directly threatened, then okay. Otherwise…

Arby
Arby
Reply to  Schurdak6
5 months ago

I don’t know whether it’s worthless but it is interesting. Why did The Exposé print it?, since usually The Exposé goes along with germ theory nonsense. I also found it interesting that the author got it 100% right up to the point where he or she started talking about wrong projections for deaths by various diseases. For example, The author didn’t say that there was no swine flu, which is the case. The author just said that the projected and claimed (by the establishment) deaths for the disease were wildly inflated. If the author knows that virology is a scam…

GeoffB
GeoffB
5 months ago

This article is written by someone who knows nothing about modern virology and is a hoax.

The facts showing that viruses exist ……

Viruses are a quirk of nature and there is scientific debate on whether they are living organisms or not.

Viruses have been proved to exist by modern virology through experiments with an isolated single human cell infected with a virus and shown to infect a different healthy human cell. (Virologists have always known that viruses cannot be “isolated” or “purified” in the dictionary sense of the word). Mock controls are done in almost every case using the same known liquid suspension. The experiment is written up in a scientific paper for peer review. Just Google “virus cell culture paper” for thousands of these papers. No paper has had to be retracted.

Viruses have been proved to exist via modern electron microscopy and photographed showing the virus which is similar but different to an exosome. Just Google “virus cell culture paper”, Images. Again no paper has been retracted.

Viruses have been proved to exist via modern whole gene sequencing of all of the base pairs. SARS-CoV-2 has 29,903 base pairs which have been laboriously whole gene sequenced (not computer generated) and uploaded to the GISAID Initiative over 5.2 million times. Again no paper has been retracted.

Viruses have been proved to exist via PCR tests which are highly specific in detecting a unique long gene sequence fragment of the virus you want to detect. It is not so good at diagnosing infection as the virus detected maybe dead fragments and not viable which can only be done by cell culture. However, the CT rate if low is an indication of infectability. Again no paper has been retracted.

Viruses have been proved to exist in the German courts in the infamous Lanka v Bardens case where all the judges and experts agreed that the measles virus was real. (Lanka weaseled himself out of paying the 100,000euro bet by persuading the court that it was proved by “six” scientific papers and not “one” that he had asked for).

There has been no scientific paper, even a pre-print or one not peer reviewed, that has ever suggested that viruses do not exist.

Unlike thousands of sceptical climate scientists questioning man made global warming there has been no retired virologist or otherwise with nothing to lose in coming forward with any doubts about “viruses existing”. There have been no death bed confessions from modern virologists. There have been no scientific papers suggesting viruses do not exist. This indicates that viruses are real and do exist.

The US has over 200 bioweapons labs around the world, there are many others. They are all working on viruses. If there is a biological accident or attack your semi-religious belief that “viruses do not exist” will not save you from sickness and/or death.

Some Charlatans with a failed scientific/medical background with books to sell, websites to fund and pills, lotions and potions to sell to the gullible have seen the profit potential of abandoning mainstream medicine in favour of the 19th century Terrain Theory and “viruses do not exist” quackery. People like Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey etc.

These people have seduced others in the alternative media without a medical or scientific background but who also have books to sell and websites to fund to support their spurious 19th century claims and that “viruses do not exist”. People like David Icke, Jon Rappaport, Mike Adams etc.

They keep appearing on each others platforms, including Alex Jones Infowars, and keep quoting each other and operate in an echo chamber of lies and deceit to illicit money from the gullible.

Facts are facts and viruses have been proved to exist.

These people may have interesting things to say on Covid, lockdowns, masks, vaccines, global warming, controlling the masses and many other subjects but on “viruses not existing” they are totally wrong, out of date and have been proved to be wrong.

You may be a follower of these people and want to believe they are right 100% of the time but on “viruses not existing” they are just plain wrong, out of date and have been proved to be wrong.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

The article is about lack of evidence for the existence of SARS-CoV2 rather than stating categorically that it definitely does not exist. It has not been proven to exist using properly purified and isolated virions which should be the starting material for any virus research including genomic sequencing and virulence studies. 

“SARS-CoV2” has been used to infected monkeys in an attempt to satisfy Kochs postulates in at least 3 separate papers. The experiments were a total failure. None of the monkeys died or became seriously ill. They developed mild respiratory disease (detectable only by microscopic examination of the lungs) that was asymptomatic and resolved within a few days. They did not develop a fever, the virus did not get into the bloodstream or spread to internal organs. We are led to believe this virus causes serious and lethal multi-organ system disease in humans. Where is the evidence for that?

Viruses can be isolated and purified by first culturing in cell culture and then using filtration and density gradient centrifugation to obtain pure virions. Virologists choose not to perform this crucial initial step when conducting their experiments. Why is that?

Rather than telling people to do a google search for peer reviewed papers why dont you be very specific and cite individual papers that you claim proves what you are saying is true? The fact that papers have not been retracted is absolutely no indication of the quality or validity of those papers. Powerful vested financial interests often control the peer reviewed journals.

How does a virus differ from an exosome? What experiments can be done to distinguish between the two?

What you call “whole genome” sequencing is shotgun sequencing of genetic fragments and is not performed on whole purified virions but a complex mixture of genetic material from numerous sources. These fragments of unknown origin are then pieced together by computer algorithms to construct a “genome”. Why not use whole purified virions instead?

PCR cannot prove the existence of any virus and the Drosten PCR has a 97% false positive rate. It is not fit for purpose. This PCR is the diagnostic test being used worldwide and the WHO instructed diagnostic labs not to use cell culture but to use this completely discredited test instead. Why?

I believe that Lanka appealed and took his case to the German Supreme court where he was successful. The supreme court agreed that the measles virus has never been proven to exist using sound scientific methodology.

Regarding lack of “death bed” confessions this is because the circular reasoning of virologists and self referential methods mean that they themselves believe in their scientism. They cant think outside the box because they dont even realise they are in a box.

Bacterial toxins make the best bioweapons and may be the true cause of many diseases attributed to viruses. Bacterial Anthrax toxin was used in this way. Cant think of a virus being used in this way though?

The germ theory was conceived in the 19th century along with the terrain theory. Modern microbiome research favours the terrain theory over the germ theory.

“an echo chamber of lies and deceit to illicit money from the gullible” sounds like the mainstream media/medicine/pharma complex to me. They have virtually unlimited money and resourses to spread their false narratives including employing internet trolls. Are they paying you well?

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

You and rest of your virus denying ilk are delusional.

A researcher has debunked all these anti-science misconceptions here ……

Frank Visser, The Corona Conspiracy: Combatting Disinformation about the Coronavirus

Part 1: Corona, Oxygen, 5G: The Paranoid Worldview of David Icke, April 2020
Part 2: Debunking Andrew Kaufman’s Virus Equals Exosome Hypothesis, May 2020
Part 3: We Need to Talk about Exosomes, May 2020
Part 4: Why Viruses Are Not Exosomes, June 2020
Part 5: The Alternative Facts of Virus Denialism, June 2020
Part 6: The Subtle Science of Whole Genome Sequencing, June 2020
Part 7: Stefan Lanka’s Vanishing Virus Act, July 2020
Part 8: Coping with Corona: The Cautious vs. The Reckless, July 2020
Part 9: Andrew Kaufman’s Take on the Pandemic That Wasn’t, July 2020
Part 10: Between Alarmism and Denialism, August 2020
Part 11: David Icke and the Method in the Madness, August 2020
Part 12: How the Coronavirus Conquered the World, August 2020
Part 13: To Test or Not to Test, That’s the Question, August 2020
Part 14: Pandemic, Infodemic, Scamdemic, Plandemic?, August 2020
Part 15: The Chromosome 8 Bombshell Evidence Canard, August 2020
Part 16: What’s Up With These Koch’s Postulates?, September 2020
Part 17: Was the SARS-CoV-2 virus created in a lab?, September 2020
Part 18: QAnon, When Conspirituality Meets Politics, September 2020
Part 19: Thomas Cowan and “The Myth of Contagion”, October 2020
Part 20: PCR-Gate: A Storm in a Petri Dish, December 2020
Part 21: David Icke: ‘QAnon is a Psy-Op, a Scam!’, January 2021
Part 22: The Million-Dollar Question About COVID-19, January 2021
Part 23: ‘The SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Has Never Been Isolated’, February 2020
Part 24: PCR-Gate 2: When Lockdown Skeptics Pose as Expert Scientists, February 2021
Part 25: The Unholy Alliance of Corona Conspiracy Theorists, March 2021
Part 26: Twitter Review of the “COVID-19 Myths” Webinar, May 2021
Part 27: David Icke Shouts Out: ‘There Is No Bloody Virus!’, June 2021
Part 28: Stefan Lanka’s Counterfeit “Control Experiments”, June 2021
Part 29: Where Are All These PCR ‘False Positives’ Anyways?, June 2021
Part 30: Is SARS-CoV-2 the Phantom of the COVID-19 Opera?, June 2021
Part 31: Andrew Kaufman and the “Fake Delta Variant”, July 2021
Part 32: Where’s the Control Experiment Protocol, Stefan?, September 2021
Part 33: PCR-Gate 3: The Debate About PCR That Never Really Happened, October 2021
Part 34: Thomas Cowan and the Spell of Corona, November 2021
Appendix 1: Fifteen Facets of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus, June 2021
Appendix 2: Who’s Who in Corona Conspiracy Country, June 2021
Appendix 3: My Corona Conspiracy Twitter Contacts, July 2021
https://integralworld.net/readingroom.html#FV

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

He is a psychologist. Where are the peer reviewed real expert papers that are supposed to debunk the article contents? How much do they pay you?

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

A real scientist was shown the garbage that you and Lanka spout about viruses not existing and this was his reply ……

“Tissue culture is a technique that has been perfected, through trial and error, to keep eukaryotic tissue cells alive and happy in a flask. Scientists like Renato Dulbecco, David Eagle, and David Baltimore have contributed to modifying the technique to what it is today, involving media that includes all of the nutrients and growth factors that cells need in order to survive.
Scientists all over the world perform these tissue culture techniques every day. I’m one of them. We never see cytopathic effects just doing these standard techniques (unless you’re really bad at cell culture and leave your cells unattended for too long). We only see cytopathic effects in response to manipulation of the cell culture, including but not limited to the addition of certain viruses or specific drugs. And yes, these experiments involve a control (mock). For example, this experiment finds cytopathic effects specific to SARS-CoV-2 in human cell lines and, of course, includes a mock control with the same culturing conditions that just doesn’t have the virus added (figure 1D). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17796-z
Lanka is either really bad at culturing cells himself and is too stupid to realize what he is doing wrong, or he is lying for clout. Either way, debunked.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebunkThis/comments/oq857p/debunk_this_stefan_lankas_critique_of_enders/

Patricia Harrity
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

“A real scientist was shown the garbage”?

Seems as though you are cherry-picking those who you define as a “real scientist” and you also seem obsessed with pieces that, in your words “Debunk” anyone who goes against the cult COVID narrative.

Yet you don’t have an intelligent argument yourself, just a lot of copying and pasting nonsense created by others. You’ve got yourself all twisted up due to a Biomedical scientist giving us some facts, hmmm.
.
What’s that all about I wonder?

I’m going to hazard a guess that you had “Covid” got lots of sympathy while you milked what would ordinarily be called “Man flu” and thought to yourself that you were on to a good thing here, with all your attention and get well messages and meals made for you.

You decided that you would also have “Long Covid” what a result that was that they created that one too,n hey?

Now you are shitting yourself in case everyone realises you faked it, just like Fauci and his lackeys faked COVID!

Too late sunshine, the game is up, the days of hypochondria and Munchhausen’s (and by proxy) are now gone.

The truth is out, whether you want to look at it or not.

Unfortunately, it’s folk like you that by continuing the voluntary job you’ve taken upon yourself to do for the corrupt orchestrators of the fraud, you are allowing us ALL, innocent children included, to be taken down the path to a totalitarian dictatorship.

Or as Sam has said, you are being paid, sold your soul, and don’t give two hoots to those suffering.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Patricia Harrity
5 months ago

I’m totally against the Covid narrative but take exception to idiots like you with your fringe view that viruses do not exist.
I’m in the same camp as Mike Yeadon, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Judy Mikovits etc. etc. who all know that viruses exist and the whole Covid narrative and experimental jabs are the problem.
Idiots like you are dividing the fight against this tyranny because of your ignorance of modern virology.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Judy Mikovits failed to give proof when Dr Kaufman challenged her on virus isolation. These people, your ‘favourites’ put their whole professional lives to viruses. They can’t admit they were wrong. But they know only what was taught to them in the R’fella universities. If you built your house to sand…

In the US 1 child in every 10 has a level of autism, learning difficulties, exactly where there are the most compulsory children vaxxes are. If your favourites now would admit that they were wrong the parents of the ruined children might rip them into pieces.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

I agree that vaccinations are horrendous and are a likely cause of autism, morbidity and death.

However, you are ignorant of modern virology if you are stupid enough to think that viruses do not exist.

I have seen the video of Kaufman and Dr Judy Mikovits and Kaufman was a complete and utter disgrace.

It was hardly a discussion or a debate and Mikovits did well not to get any more angry at the slurs from Kaufman.

The fractured Zoom meeting was supposed to be about the danger of the Covid experimental jabs.

Kaufman hijacked the meeting to self publicise his ridiculous belief that viruses do not exist.

Mikovits assumed Kaufman has some knowledge of virology and that is why she was using technical terms which Kaufman admitted on video that he did not understand.

As anyone with an ounce of virology knowledge can testify viruses cannot be isolated or purified in the dictionary sense of the word because they are only evident when they are attached to a cell. Kaufman should know this.

It is like someone who doesn’t understand science asking for a photograph of gravity to prove it exists.

Virologists have “isolated” viruses millions of times by showing them in a single living cell. Viruses cannot exist without that cell. The “whole gene sequence” of viruses are also now known.

Kaufman is a psychiatrist and is very good at persuading people that black is white. Even David Icke, who should know better, has fallen for it.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Don’t attack the person but argue if you can. Dr Lanka IS a virologist, he got NOBEL for virus isolation but that was a GIANT sea virus who lived in symbiosis with an algae. He was the first who uncovered the ‘pathogenic virus’ tale.
Your Nobel..?

You failed to answer to me, my last comment, the questions.

1 Why no children get two different viral infection in the same time? With your logic, viruses are out to jump on you and multiply to eternity, but if one weakened you, you are more easy target to the next. Why a child never get chicken pox and scarlet fever in the same time???

2 Where were your viruses 200-300 years ago?? Why is that that every book which were written centuries ago are about a bacterial! pandemic or epidemic but viral? Plague, typhus, TB, leper – all bacterial. According to old notes even small pox didn’t jump from person to person, bed bugs caused it (it was probably a parasite then) .

Where were your viruses in the past??

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Lanka was a marine biologist who discovered a virus on a deep sea sponge about 30 years ago. He certainly didn’t receive a Nobel prize.

There was no money in marine biology so he resorted to selling pills, potions and lotions to the gullible which is much more profitable.

He has been totally discredited.

People can have more than one virus at the same time.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/09/03/909000378/flu-season-looms-and-scientists-wonder-how-flu-and-covid-19-might-mix?t=1638631791818

Arby
Arby
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

“People can have more than one virus at the same time.”

And yet…

Where Are The Other Viruses? They, Like Truths, Aren’t There” / https://www.bitchute.com/video/qyOnaRpE8FH9/

Arby
Arby
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Interestingly, as an aside, Dr Lanka no longer refers to himself as a virologist. That’s because virology is a scam.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Viruses can be isolated after growing them in cells using density gradient centrifugation and filtration. That should be the starting point for every experiment. Virologists do not do this. You are ignorant about virology.

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Good to see you have reason. Yes David Icke is a fraud but does have significant good information.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  covid1984pl
5 months ago

I’ve been supporting David Icke for the last 20 years and agree with most of what he says.
Unfortunately, he has been seduced by Andrew Kaufman into believing that viruses do not exist when I know that they do exist.

Koen
Koen
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

I’m not a scientist, just to make sure you don’t start using technical terms.

You say viruses cannot exist without cell, how then does transmission occur from one person to another ? Why are we constantly encouraged to sanitize everything to make sure to not get infected ?

Thanks for insights

Butterballs
Butterballs
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

You throw verbal abuse around don’t you? Labelling people stupid and claiming they spout garbage? ‘Ad hominem’ is a sign of a lack of ability to debate and discuss.

Henry Longstop
Henry Longstop
Reply to  GeoffB
4 months ago

“…..As anyone with an ounce of virology knowledge can testify viruses cannot be isolated or purified in the dictionary sense of the word because they are only evident when they are attached to a cell…….”
Wow. I don’t have an ounce of virology knowledge so always naively assumed that a ‘virus’ was an an organism, an independent observable thing with volition and an agenda, and which attacks us from outside.
Drowning in ignorance, the obvious question for me now is, if the ‘virus’ depends on its observable existence on the presence of a cell, perhaps it has no independent existence and is simply an artefact of the cell. Ah, that’s getting a bit close to Terrain Theory, which has obviously been discredited.
So where do I go from here? Believing in something which can’t be shown to exist unless it’s in the presence of something that has been shown to exist. If I’m honest I’m finding it difficult to believe in this ‘virus’ of yours.

Arby
Arby
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Indeed.

“The Ruination Of Doctors” / https://www.bitchute.com/video/jm75a9eLfnpc/

Stu P
Stu P
Reply to  GundelP
4 months ago

The guy got the man flu And believes Judy mikovits 😂 enough said

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Viruses exist but not how you think they do. I am a scientist! prove I am not.I observe, study and observe again.I refine my view over and over and will again and again as new evidence come to light. So who is the scientist?

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Once the cells have been grown to confluence in nutrient rich medium they are then transferred to a nutrient depleted medium contain cytotoxic substances such as antibiotics. The already abnormal cells (usually cancer cells) are essentially starved and poisoned before the clinical sample is added. It is true that not all clinical samples induce a cytopathic effect but the cause of this effect has not been proven to be a virus. It could just as easily be bacterial toxins or other kinds of toxins.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

The substrate for the virus infected cell is exactly the same as in the mock control.
There are no toxins.
The cytopathic result is caused by the virus.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

The cytopathic effect is caused by something in some of the clinical samples. You are assuming that amongst a complex soup of substances including bacteria, fungi, and toxins that the effect it due to a virus. Prove it. Virologists havent been able to so i doubt you will be able to.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

There are no “bacteria, fungi, and toxins” in the substrate they are all nutrients and compounds to keep the cell and the virus alive.
I have already linked to a scientific paper that proves it, here it is again. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17796-z

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

The bacteria, fungi and toxins are in the clinical samples added to the cells as i made clear previously.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

“The bacteria, fungi and toxins are in the clinical samples added to the cells as i made clear previously.”

Of course they are not.
Where on earth do you get your information from?

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Of course they are. I get my information from working in an NHS diagnostic lab for almost a decade. Where do you get your information from?

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

If you allow “bacteria, fungi and toxins” into the experiment then you are shit at your job.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Respiratory samples always contain bacteria, fungi and toxins so adding them cant be avoided. Virologists are shit at their jobs as the article goes into great detail about.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

Respiratory samples always contain bacteria, fungi and toxins so adding them cant be avoided.”

Whatever is in the samples are also in the mock control.
The sample with the virus shows different cytopathic effects to the mock control.

If you don’t know this then it proves you are shit at your job.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Mock controls are not used in diagnostic labs. If they were used they would not contain the respiratory sample.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Bacteria comes with the genetic material, too what they use as soil to ‘breed viruses’, monkey kidney cells, bovine serum, antibiotics are fungis. Did you missed that part in school?
That’s the basic problem with their virus ‘isolation’, that they use genetic materials from other sources, too. Because no matter what they found the source of it can be more things.
Plus, you’ll see the same reaction in the cell culture without adding materials from an ill or healthy person. Their isolation process is a fraud.

Last edited 5 months ago by GundelP
GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Total and utter rubbish.
Exactly the same ingredients are in the experiment as the mock control other than the virus attached to the isolated cell in the experiment.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Smell the coffee.

Over the last several months we have requested from the Center of Disease Control (CDC) evidence for the isolation and existence for the any and all viruses, including CoV – 2 and 19, MERS, Influenza, Polio, Measles, HIV, XMRV, HTLV-1, HTLV-III/LAV, HPV, Ebola, Zika, just to name a few of the so-called viruses, disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
These written requests were made by Ms. Christine Massey to CDC/ATSDR FOIA Chief Officer Mr. Robert Andoh, to locate and deliver ANY records, research and/or findings for ANY “viral” isolation and purification (by anyone, anywhere, anytime in the World) from a patient sample via maceration, filtration and/or the use of an ultracentrifuge or what is called the ‘Gold Standard’ for isolating and identifying a pathological micro or nana organism. The ‘God Standard’ for isolating and identifying microbes is referred to as Koch’s and Rivers Postulates which was established many years ago
The CDC Chief FOIA, Mr. Roger Andoh provided straightforward responses to each one or our requests, admitting in writing that they have NO RECORD of ANY KIND, for the following so-called phantom “viruses”, including CoV – 2 -19, HIV, HPV, XMRV, HTMV-1, HTMV-111/LV, Measles, Influenza, MERS, EBOLA, ZIKA, POLIO,:

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

The question asked to certain institutions was worded in a particular way asking for proof that viruses have been “purified” and “isolated” without any other particles. Viruses do not work that way, they are only evident when attacking another cell so it is impossible to “isolate” a virus without another cell being present. Virologists know this but it doesn’t stop them agreeing that viruses exist. The people who worded the question are using semantics to try to prove that viruses don’t exist and it is not science. That is why the institutions said they do not have “purified and isolated viral samples”.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Liar. I read the CDC’s ‘isolation’ process, they use bovine serum (genetic material) monkey kidney (another genetic material) under code names but researching will show what they stand for. Plus they used antibiotics, type which extremely poisonous to kidney cells.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

You are ignorant of virology.
Living cells for experimentation need to be kept alive during transportation and it is standard practice to add anti-biotics to the substrate.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Really?
From CDC’s site.
Please show me that part in the process when the actual virus was isolated = separated from everything else. If you can’t then feel free to explain what is the proof they found a novel virus and the proof it causes covid. Just because it’s a genetic soup with everything in it. And that’s the way they do it.

‘Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States…Specimen CollectionVirus isolation from patient samples was deemed not to be human subjects research by the National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (research determination no. 0900f3eb81ab4b6e). Clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA, were collected as described (1). Nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens were collected on day 3 postsymptom onset, placed in 2–3 mL of viral transport medium, used for molecular diagnosis, and frozen. Confirmed PCR-positive specimens were aliquoted and refrozen until virus isolation was initiated.

Cell Culture, Limiting Dilution, and Virus IsolationWe used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage. We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%) and antibiotics/antimycotics (GIBCO,).
We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate. We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…’

It doesn’t look to me they used antibiotics only for transportation… They poisoned the genetic material soup.

(Be careful, I worked in tissue laboratory working with the ‘material’ of living and dead. In a big hospital. Absolutely nothing jumped on us and we wore only gloves. No glasses, mask or any special protective stuff you can see in these days. Most of my colleagues got cancer after some years due to the harsh chemicals but I don’t know about a single case of viral or bacterial infection from those tissues. My boss told us around 1990 that AIDS was a hoax, an impossible illness in that form.)

Shill Hunter
Shill Hunter
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Virology is a fraud and you’re a shill

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  Shill Hunter
5 months ago

Viruses exist but not how they say it does. We cannot catch them. Virus means venom. So we get poisoned and they come out.

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Whose standard?

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

They made this experiment without body fluid of an ill, they gave nothing to the culture, but around the poisoned, dying cells, there were ‘viruses’. They are exosomes, period. This experiment was done twice, first in the end of last century, secondly a year ago. Details are here:

‘New ‘Covid Scariant’: Fact or Fiction with Dr Andrew Kaufman. Enjoy some sanity amid the fascist madness’https://davidicke.com/2021/12/03/new-covid-scariant-fact-or-fiction-with-dr-andrew-kaufman-enjoy-some-sanity-amid-the-fascist-madness/

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Laughable.

Viruses are similar but different to exosomes.

Kaufman is a psychiatrist and now a nutritionist who has seen how easy it is to obtain money from the gullible.

Some Charlatans with a failed scientific/medical background with books to sell, websites to fund and pills, lotions and potions to sell to the gullible have seen the profit potential of abandoning mainstream medicine in favour of the 19th century Terrain Theory and “viruses do not exist” quackery. People like Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey etc.

These people have seduced others in the alternative media without a medical or scientific background but who also have books to sell and websites to fund to support their spurious 19th century claims and that “viruses do not exist”. People like David Icke, Jon Rappaport, Mike Adams etc.

They keep appearing on each others platforms, including Alex Jones Infowars, and keep quoting each other and operate in an echo chamber of lies and deceit to illicit money from the gullible.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

‘Viruses are similar but different to exosomes…’ – OK, please prove it. They are same sized, form, etc, have the same characteristic. They are exactly the same under an electron microscope. Your proof?

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  GundelP
5 months ago

Viruses are NOT exosomes. https://integralworld.net/visser171.html

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Jones, Icke yes are frauds on your side of the argument to discredit those on this side. You need to look in the misinformation 101.

Arby
Arby
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

Stefan has proven that the method of isolation used by virologists produces artefacts that virologists (some knowingly and some not) call proof of the presence of viruses. Stefan did a step by step isolation procedure, but left out the patient sample (which, according to virologists, would have the virus in it). He got the exact same cytopathic effects (disintegration) that virologists get when they use patient samples. He destroyed the scam of virology with that one experiment.

Stefan isn’t the only doctor to note that the methods used by researchers are the cause of effects that they are observing and attributing to disease-causing pathogens.

== =
In his 2011 paper entitled Cell Biology at the Beginning of the 21st Century is in Dire Straits, Dr Hillman details the preparations required for a number of laboratory procedures and states that,

“When a tissue is prepared for histology, histochemistry, electron microscopy, or immunochemistry, and animal is killed; the tissue is excised; it is fixed or frozen; it is embedded; it is sectioned; it is rehydrated; it is stained; it is mounted; it is radiated by light, or bombarded by electron beams.”

A particularly salient point is that any tissue sample that is to be examined is clearly no longer alive after has been subjected to these preparations procedures. Dr Hillman explains in his 2013 paper that there is a complete lack of recognition of the effects of such preparation procedures on the tissue sample and comments that,

“Biologists have shown little interest in the effects that the procedures they use have on the structure and chemistry of the tissues they are studying.”
= ==

The above quote is from page 80 of Dawn Lester’s and David Parker’s book titled “What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong.”

Stefan destroys virology: https://www.bitchute.com/video/q81nCK05aZ0x/

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Arby
5 months ago

I agree with much of what Stefan and others have to say about virology but disagree on some points. I worked in an NHS diagnostic lab for a decade. 

It is true that the cells used to culture viruses are abnormal to begin with and they are further stressed by the culture conditions. However, i used to add multiple clinical samples to multiple cell cultures and most of them never developed a cytopathic effect. Only a few of them did. So the negatives were de facto negative controls. This means that it must have been something in the clinical sample causing the cytopathic effect. 

Interestingly we tested for the bacterial toxin produced by C. diff in exactly the same way. Positive samples generated a cytopathic effect that virologists would probably wrongly attribute to a “virus”. Do you have a write up of Stefans experiment? Cant do videos for boring reasons i wont go into.

I agree that virology is a scam because “viruses” and exosomes cant be differentiated from one another and i agree that artifacts are generated by the microscopic techniques that are used. I think perhaps many “viral” diseases are caused by bacterial toxins and other types of toxin.

The virus model of disease is probably completely wrong and has certainly never been properly proven. The germ theory as it used to be described in terms of other microbes is simplistic but when combined with terrain theory makes more sense. Modern microbiome research supports this point of view. Some types of bacteria and fungi are pathogenic especially when they start producing toxins “Friendly” bacteria can get very unfriendly under certain conditions.

Duke Nukem
Duke Nukem
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

If you are referring to Dr. Andrew Kaufman, he is a Psychiatrist; Psychiatrists are still MD’s since they are able to dispense Big-Pharmafia petroleum based toxins, labeled “medications” straight from John D. Rockefeller.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Duke Nukem
5 months ago

No i was referring to: “Frank Visser, graduated as a psychologist of culture and religion.” Who apparently knows all about viruses.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Duke Nukem
5 months ago

And molecular biologist and as a professional witness a kind of investigator, too. That’s what he does, investigate and he is very good.

‘.. I completed my psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and I have a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology. ...’
From Dr Kaufman’ site

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

Nah you are delusional and will never be convinced regardless of the information.So why bother trying to convince you? Is that not what your side says? Ask yourself a simple question? Who gains from the fraudulent medical system? Look in to that.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Don’t sweat so badly. Some of us are educated enough and / or critical thinker to decide which has or hasn’t got real proof.

Tell me why is that that no children ever get two different ‘viral’ illnesses in the same time. As a virus believer you should know that their only goal to jump to you to multiply in you till eternity or at least till your death, the best time is when you already weak. So why they never get whooping cough and chicken pox in the same time?

Tell me where were these viral illnesses 200-300 years ago? Why is that that every book which were written hundreds of years ago are about bacterial pandemics? Plague, cholera, leper, TB, etc. Where were these viruses back then? Hiding under a rock?

The big polio epidemic in the US in fact was mass poisoning with DDT.

The small pox didn’t jump from person to person but came with bed bugs (likely a parasite but virus)

They never found rabies’ virus either. Similar symptoms caused by different things (poisoning, parasite, extreme dehydration) under one label.
There is an excellent article about it.
‘Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review‘ by Milicent Morden.

And you LIED about the Dr Lanka’ measles case just like how the MSM is lying about it .I copied it to an other Expose’ article. Of course they are lying about it, otherwise they have to stop with children vaxxes, the measles case made a precedent with that court judgement that there is no proof that the virus of measles exists.

José Miguel
José Miguel
Reply to  José Miguel
5 months ago

This link that I have put is the German court that passed sentence, it is the record of the trial, at the end of the document, the sentence clearly reads that “no scientific publication has proven the existence of the measles virus”.

Last edited 5 months ago by José Miguel
GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  José Miguel
5 months ago

You haven’t understood the court papers.

All the judges and expert witnesses agreed that the measles virus exists.

You have not quoted the last sentence correctly.
It clearly states that ……
“As a result, the appeal, insofar as it is admissible, was successful because the claimant did not meet the criterion of the claim of proving the existence of the measles virus through “a scientific publication”.”

If you read the rest of the court papers they were satisfied that the SIX papers submitted confirmed the existence of the virus and it’s diameter but as Lanka asked for ONE paper and not SIX his appeal was successful due to this legal semantics point and he didn’t need to pay the 100,000euros bet.

Rene Borg
Rene Borg
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

deleted

Last edited 5 months ago by Rene Borg
GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Rene Borg
5 months ago

Rene Borg is paranoid.

Ruth
Ruth
Reply to  GeoffB
1 month ago

But what do you feel these “anti-science” people have to gain by coming forward? The vaccine agenda is most certainly what those attempting to silence others have to gain……

Arby
Arby
Reply to  Sam
5 months ago

As Tom Cowan points out, if you’re actually diseased, then your lungs ‘are’ a viral culture. Why can’t they get a virus directly from a sick person. They come up with ridiculous reasons why they can’t and end up contradicting themselves.

Talk about contradictions, they ‘grow’ the virus in a cell (not viral) culture, on monkey kidney cells, but they proceed to mix the sputum from the patient with stuff that includes toxins (including nephrotoxins that kill kidney cells) and antibiotics, while feeding the bio matter a starvation diet. So their idea of ‘growing’ viruses in a cell culture is to both starve and poison the bio matter. Then when they see small particles – it’s called disintegration, which all dead things experience – they pick one and call it a virus, claiming that that caused the cell death. And we are supposed to nod and go “Okay.” Most do.

not sure
not sure
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Please, tell me the google search terms where I can find some scientific papers about these 200 bioweapons labs tho… You realize people like Christian Drosten deny they exist, right?

Rob. J
Rob. J
Reply to  not sure
5 months ago

Another thing they do not do is adding fluids of an healthy person to those cell cultures

ForestWalk
ForestWalk
Reply to  Rob. J
4 months ago

Ah, but you see if they did that, what would happen to the story of “asymptomatic carriers”?

Leon Munro
Leon Munro
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Viruses do exist just some are designed by man by taking strains of viruses like take malaria as base virus has anyone done the research how this pandemic is so bad I’m sure if the virus is properly looked at in an independand lab they will find malaria is part strain of the virus as most symptoms of the pandemic has the symptoms and affects of malaria when spreading. Go look it up.

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  Leon Munro
5 months ago

I agree with you.
It is likely SARS-CoV-2 did not occur naturally and was created in a lab via gain of function research with US money.
Whether it escaped accidently or deliberately is another question.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Even if it would be a lab virus, it must have been isolated but never happened as virus isolation is not possible.

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

Geoff look for a book called virusmania

GeoffB
GeoffB
Reply to  covid1984pl
5 months ago

It has been totally discredited.

ForestWalk
ForestWalk
Reply to  GeoffB
4 months ago

But where is the evidence for airborne transmission of any “pathogenic virus”? It doesn’t exist. And without airborne transmission, how is this supposed lab-created bio-weapon circulating? And how is it mysteriously escaping the host-cells on a worldwide scale to infect millions of people in crowded places (supposedly), and yet they cannot reproduce this in a lab? Come on now! This is absurdity, it is beyond ridiculous.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Leon Munro
5 months ago

Malaria is a parasite caused illness but virus.
(Always happy to help…)

Wotan
Wotan
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

You clearly know nothing about viruses. Go to the website of Dr. Zach Bush, by far the most brilliant medical scientist on this planet and read all there is to know about viruses. I shall not bother going into detail here. Go and learn from Zach Bush.

José Miguel
José Miguel
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

You are lying when you say that the German court ruled against Stefan Lanka, I give you the link to the web page where the judgement of this court of justice is hosted, where in paragraph 122 you can read perfectly that: “As a result, the appeal, insofar as it is admissible, is successful in any case, because the criterion of the offer to prove the existence of the measles virus by “a scientific publication” was not fulfilled by the plaintiff. Consequently, the plaintiff is not entitled to any pre-trial legal fees.”
https://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1

Arby
Arby
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

No. God did not create project earth, with its crowning feature, man, only to also add in invisible monsters that would plague us forever. Nature isn’t attacking nature. As David Martin said, People who have sold their souls are attacking us. Period. And, by the way, that’s something that can be done. You can sell your soul. You can ‘request’ that Jehovah God strikes you from his book of life and he will honor that. He will force no one to live who doesn’t want to. If you attack him and his standards (truth, compassion, justice), knowingly and willingly, then you are making such a request.

les online
les online
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

So well argued, then you go and spoil it all by listing the names of All the prominent ones who dispute that viruses exist…
A too detailed, seemingly too well rehearsed, alibi always arouses an investigating detectives suspicion.

Butterballs
Butterballs
Reply to  GeoffB
5 months ago

The Fauci virus definitely exists. As does the Bill Gates virus, both inside and outside computers. Pasteur is a fraud. Terrain theory wins the day. Are you pretending that those behind the covid hoax were not motivated by financial gain? Pull the other one.

Stu P
Stu P
Reply to  GeoffB
4 months ago

Look and the end of the day, whats goin on has noting 2do with a virus!! It’s about the collapse of the world economy, the social credit system and digital ID.

Caoimhin
Caoimhin
5 months ago

I come across the patent for sars. The Chinese found the full sequence for the virus in the Shoe Horn Bat. It was reported in Feb 2020 the Chinese had filed for a patent pending from the Wuhan Lab. The patent is there. The scientist who helped develop the vaccie in UK said on GMB they got the genome code from the Chinese. So, I do believe the virus exists, The pandemic on the other hand is fake. When you are working with a virus, it needs isolated in the blood, then super charged for working with under the scope. That is what escaped the lab, a super charged flu. By the time it has got out of Wuhan it was just a normal seasonal flu. But, scientist found the virus had been spliced with somehting, 2 saying it is HIV. So, it looks like they were working on making it a serious virus but it got out befor eit was finished.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Caoimhin
5 months ago

Then watch the Kaufman latest, he explains this sequencing part (another fraud)

https://archive.org/details/dr.-andrew-kaufman-at-red-pill-expo-oct-10-2020
This one above is older but more easy to follow.

This one is the latest but Sayer interventions makes it difficult to follow.
https://davidicke.com/2021/12/03/new-covid-scariant-fact-or-fiction-with-dr-andrew-kaufman-enjoy-some-sanity-amid-the-fascist-madness/

Last edited 5 months ago by GundelP
Koen
Koen
Reply to  Caoimhin
5 months ago

I do have a snippet of an interivew of a chinese scientist from CDC Wuhan, confirming they did NOT isaloate a virus.

not sure
not sure
5 months ago

An Antifa money laundering organization known as the punk band ZSK wrote a song about Christian Drosten. lolwut

Leon Munro
Leon Munro
5 months ago

Hi are you In need of hosting, like have your site hosted? I can host your site for you as I have a non profit organisation aswell and would sponsor your hosting by hosting your website on my hosting panel

Purebloodpatriot
Purebloodpatriot
5 months ago

Parasites found in so called vaccines. Mind control by parasites is real, and thus their opposition to ivermectin. Ever heard of toxoplasmosis? It is a parasite found in cat feces that causes women to become “crazy cat ladies” so they collect many cats thus, reproducing itself. This parasite takes control of grasshoppers and makes them commit suicide. Why do you think the homosexual lifestyle is so encouraged? I sincerely believe there is alot of demonic forces at play in our government. One only has to open their eyes, pay attention and ask God for discernment. I did a parasite cleanse thanks to ivermectin and let’s just say it was successful.
Get your ivermectin before it is too late ivmpharmacy.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Purebloodpatriot
MIKE WILLIAMS
MIKE WILLIAMS
5 months ago

“The purported novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has not been proven to exist in nature and has not been established as the cause of “COVID-19”, “

Oh FFS
Then you have lost all credibility.
I am out

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
Reply to  MIKE WILLIAMS
5 months ago

CDC say they do not have it. The WHO and the Chinese admit it was never isolated.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  covid1984pl
5 months ago

I must admit that dodos like me don’t really understand this. I was at a freedom rally where the scientist type guy on the podium said that the Covid 19 virus has not been proven to exist and the crowd fell silent and were perplexed. Not saying he’s wrong, but your average non-scientist like myself says, “But thousands of people are dying, surely the Covid 19 virus exists” and we struggle to understand the concept of it not existing at all.

Arby
Arby
Reply to  A Person
5 months ago

You might find this interesting:

“Corona: Throughout history, people never died, they are dying now, therefore it must be the virus” by Jon Rappoport / https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/21/corona-never-died-dying-now-must-be-the-virus/

Butterballs
Butterballs
Reply to  A Person
5 months ago

Thousands of people die every day. It’s normal and happens to everyone. The death statistics were simply manipulated so that people who died from flu and other illnesses and diseases were recorded as having died from or ‘with’ coronavirus. You might as well say people died ‘with’ athletes foot. It was fraud right from the start. Respiratory illnesses like pneumonia (known as ‘old man’s friend’) kill thousands of mainly elderly every year plus those who are immunosuppressed. Every doctor knows this so they must all realize that the flu statistics have been manipulated because it doesn’t just ‘disappear’.

Butterballs
Butterballs
Reply to  MIKE WILLIAMS
5 months ago

Goodbye! Flouncing off in a huff is always a sure sign that the argument is valid.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Exposé has published a study by an anonymous “top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his field” […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Exposé has published a study by an anonymous “top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his […]

Eddie
Eddie
5 months ago

I read such reports slowly. They are saving my life. I am convinced Covid-19 is a fraud…fraudulent genomes, testing, vaccines, etc. Then comes the deadly treatment protocols in hospitals. Genocide is already happening and can only accelerate. Time to even abandon the
Woldometer as they are based on the fraudulent PCR test.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Exposé has published a study by an anonymous “top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] December 3, 2021New Study published by top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against… […]

Duke Nukem
Duke Nukem
5 months ago

Apparently this “expert” is nameless. Sounds like a phantom. The information of a fake narrative explains exactly what’s going on right now. If this sh!t were real, and the MAGA jabs were even half what they claim, people would line up (many already did), coercion would not be necessary. The fact they are trying to force the issue with tyrannical means is awfully suspicious.
I sent an email to one of the administrators inquiring about a name for this “Biomedical Scientist” that could be researched. I have yet to hear back.

les online
les online
Reply to  Duke Nukem
5 months ago

Many who add their bit to the ‘comments’ section of online articles use fake names… They know their name is not important.. When they dont include a name, any name – real or fake – that must mean their ‘comment’ is suspicious…Perfect Logic…

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Exposé has published a study by an anonymous “top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his field” […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] The Exposé – The purported novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has not been proven to exist in nature and has not been established as the cause of “COVID-19”, the pandemic disease concocted by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Likewise, there are no variants of the “virus”, which also only exist hypothetically in computers, and in online gene banks. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] The Exposé on December 3, 2021 • ( 75 Comments […]

José Miguel
José Miguel
5 months ago

I have translated this article into my language, Spanish, to spread it in my social networks, but without the author’s name I cannot do it. I understand the serious risk these people are taking right now by revealing the truth, but this information without the author’s signature is valueless.

covid1984pl
covid1984pl
5 months ago

I agree with this article. There is always on luney tune like me that comes out of the wood work and posts an out there comment. The whole virology and pharma comes out of the Vatican and Jesuit system. Most political leaders are trained by them as are schools and universities etc See – Covid-19 Fraud – Masks & Vaccines Exposed (independencebaptist.com) and listen to some of the messages there on the subject. Not my place but I wish I was by the beach instead of the middle of nowhere.

Last edited 5 months ago by covid1984pl
ameli apuy
ameli apuy
5 months ago

THE JABS INOCULATIONS ADN ALTERING GENES THERAPHY BAD CALLED “VACCINATIONS” CONTAINS GRAPHENE OXIDE , this is the hardest material in the planet, that are reorganizing inside your body replicating organs and clonning humans from inside to the outside ASIMILATING LIFE IN A DEMONIC AGENDA THAT ARE BIBLICAL https://odysee.com/@%C3%89breszt-%C5%90k:0/Dr-Andreas-Noack-Girlfriend-Anna:0 Dr Andreas Noack LA QUINTA COLUMNA & THE DOCTOR CAMPRA INFORM GO ODYSEE TO KNOW THE TRUTH TELEGRAM , WE ARE NOT THE LEGAL FICTION WE ARE SON OF GOD WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER, Russel Jay Gould our commander in Chief, Be United reclaim your life , you are NOT your birth CERTIFICATE, LEAR OPPT one peoples public trust, claim your life be Free, Forever, the governments are fraud nd Trump is a Hero !Adonai

Aaron Driver
Aaron Driver
5 months ago

I have a doctorate in physiotherapy, and i am absolutely appalled by the lack of scientific rigor in evaluating the current best practice in regards to the scamdemic… From the get go the original pcr test fro covid 19 paper was nonsense, being rammed through in less than 72 hours using the position on the european database to allow the publishing of their paper is always and frowned upon, conflict of interest is a real issue. We in scientific community always ask is their conflict of interest and if there is, like in this case ,you dont even waste your time reading its because its garbage as 44 authors later peer reviewed this original paper and all agreed that the study had multiple fatal flaws. This is the original lie and as far as i am concerned there is no need to debate anything further based on this orignal lie.

SusanD
SusanD
5 months ago

Thank you for the helpful explanations of the PCR test and the sequencing. Please explain the reality of “viral load” as is now being tossed about. How is it determined? My guess is that the PCR test is used, which violates Kary Mullis’ remark that the procedure is qualitative, not quantitative.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  SusanD
5 months ago

Viral load is determined using the PCR test and it is not at all accurate.

Arby
Arby
5 months ago

The article, by an unknown author, gets a lot right that The Exposé normally ignores, but strikes a discordant note when it begins listing wrong projections of deaths by various diseases, such as swine flu, which didn’t exist. “In 2009, Ferguson and the ICL team claimed that swine flu would kill 65,000 people in the UK. In reality, swine flu killed 457 people in the UK.” In reality, the swine flu didn’t exist and therefore didn’t kill anyone.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Arby
5 months ago

The author was just pointing out the wildly inaccurate computer predictions by Ferguson and the ICL team using official stats.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Exposé has published a study by an anonymous “top British Biomedical scientist with 30 years of experience in his […]

ImagiNation
ImagiNation
5 months ago

” These measures have been carefully constructed by the government “

No, these measures have been carefully constructed by the WEF and implemented by the government in order to instigate their Great Reset but because the WEF are never mentioned in the media, people never discus it.

Brenda
Brenda
5 months ago

Staring us right in our face!

media control.jpg
trackback
5 months ago

[…] top British whistleblower published a scathing critique of virology’s “voodoo scientism” which is compatible with Bailey’s remarks, asserting the methodology virologists use to claim […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] top British whistleblower published a scathing critique of virology’s “voodoo scientism” which is compatible with Bailey’s remarks, asserting the methodology virologists use to claim […]

CK_
CK_
5 months ago

The crux of this debate comes down to this: if infectious viruses truly exist, then it must be possible to purify them. If I’m infected with SARS-COV-2 and I cough, then surely there must be complete and intact SARS-COV-2 viruses (all 30,000 nucleotides) in my cough droplets. If this can’t be done (as GeoffB states without explanation), then how can they possibly exist?

This must-read article gets it right:
https://hive.blog/proofofbrain/@francesleader/omicron-the-impossible-variant-by-steve-falconer

trackback
5 months ago

[…] top British whistleblower published a scathing critique of virology’s “voodoo scientism” which is compatible with Bailey’s remarks, asserting the methodology virologists use to claim […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Not to mention the fact that 99% of the “cases” and 170 deaths which were all in China, were deemed to have been from a novel virus that had not been proven to exist, as it had not been isolated. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Not to mention the fact that 99% of the “cases” and 170 deaths which were all in China, were deemed to have been from a novel virus that had not been proven to exist, as it had not been isolated. […]

Nikki
Nikki
5 months ago

Hi I would like to know who this scientist is? The article seems to be anonymous which is unhelpful as it makes it difficult to check The provenance of the article. Please can u share some more details?

Paul Vonharnish
Paul Vonharnish
4 months ago

I find it interesting that most of the comments below revolve around whether viruses exist or not. Most of the debate is simple mental masturbation. Viruses DO exist, period. It’s the mathematical formula and application of allorhythmia that should prevail the question.

Hundreds of millions of people are being maimed and murdered by a cartel of technocrats and eugenicists. Any indictments? Any arrests? Any trials of mass murderers? Zero…

charles kint
charles kint
4 months ago

commented many times on different platforms and yes i do support financially but requests for donations are a bit overwhelming
needless to say I do agree with all of the above we have to keep at it
The folks that are playing god with all these issues yes also the climate must be stopped before it is too late

Sheena Parish
Sheena Parish
4 months ago

Fraud vitiates everything United States v Throckmorton – all Covid laws and contracts are null and void

trackback
3 months ago

[…] response to my article published by the Expose in December last year (Virology’s Voodoo Scientism Is Not Real Science) somebody posted an article by Frank Visser in […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] “New Study published by top British Biomedical Scientist proves the Covid-19 Fraud is a Crime against Humanity”https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/03/new-study-proves-covid-is-a-fraud/ […]