|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is the name used to describe a number of potentially life-threatening infections and illnesses that happen when your immune system has been severely damaged.
People with acquired immune deficiency syndrome are at an increased risk for developing certain cancers and for infections that usually occur only in individuals with a weak immune system.
Here we present a series of strong evidence that the Covid-19 vaccines are causing recipients to develop acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or a novel condition with similar attributes that can only be described as Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).
Exhibit A
Vaccine Effectiveness doesn’t wane; Immune System Performance does
Vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
The first time the body encounters a germ, it can take several days to make and use all the germ-fighting tools needed to get over the infection. After the infection, the immune system remembers what it learned about how to protect the body against that disease.
Vaccines allegedly help develop immunity by imitating an infection. Once the imitation infection induced by the vaccine goes away, the body is left with a supply of “memory” t-cells and antibodies that will remember how to fight that disease in the future
So, when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.
In regards to the Covid-19 injections –
- A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.
- A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are no more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.
- Buta vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated. In other words the immune system performance of the vaccinated is 50% worse than the natural immune system performance of the unvaccinated. Therefore, the Covid-19 vaccines have damaged the immune system.
Exhibit B
UK Data shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a real-world Negative Effectiveness
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publishes a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report, with each report containing four weeks worth of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status.
Here are the Covid-19 case-rates per 100,000 by vaccination status for each age group over the age of 18 in England, plus the average case rate per 100,000 for all adults in England taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 5 – 2022 –
As you can see the case-rate per 100k is clearly lowest among the unvaccinatied population in all age groups, with case rates among the triple vaccined population approximately double the rate seen among the unvaccinated in most age groups, and case rates among the double vaccinated population approximately triple the rate seen among the unvaccinated in most age groups.
This data alone should deeply concern even the most avid vaccine advocates.
Now that we know the case-rates, we can use Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula to work out the real-world vaccine effectiveness.
Unvaccinated case rate – Vaccinated case rate / Unvaccinated case rate = Vaccine Effectiveness
e.g. Double Vaccinated 18-80+: 1,846.38 – 5,226.1 / 1,846.38 = minus-183%
Therefore, the average real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness in England for all adults as a whole in January 2022 was MINUS-183%.
Here’s how effective the Covid-19 vaccines are proving to be in each double vaccinated age group –
The lowest Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness was seen in the 40-49 age group in England throughout January 2022, recorded at minus-209.4%, with the 50-59 age group not far behind.
But don’t forget, as we proved with the evidence presented in Exhibit A, Vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
Therefore, the UKHSA data actually shows that the Covid-19 injections are decimating the natural immune system.
Exhibit C
UK Data actually shows the Fully Vaccinated have a Negative Immune System Performance
To work out immune system performance we have to alter the calculation used to work out vaccine effectiveness slightly and divide our answer by either the largest of the vaccinated or unvaccinated case rate as per the case rates provided in Exhibit B.
Unvaccinated case rate – Vaccinated case rate / largest of the unvaccinated / vaccinated case rate = Immune System Performancee.g. Double Vaccinated 18-80+: 1,846.38 – 5,226.1 / 5,226.1 = minus-65%
The following chart shows the true extent of the damage caused to the double vaccinated populations immune systems by age group in January 2022 –
This means the average double vaccinated person in England is down to the last 35% of their immune system for fighting viruses, bacteria, and cancers. But is this data just a one off, or is the performance of the fully vaccinated populations immune system declining by the week?
Exhibit D
UK Data proves the Fully Vaccinated Populations Immune System Performance is declining by the week
If we take the case rates found in previous UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance reports we’re able to track the real world vaccine effectiveness and immune system performance of the vaccinated over the past few months.
So we took the case rates found in the following reports –
Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 37′ (Published by PHE)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 41’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 45’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 49’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022’ (Published by UKHSA)
And then calculated the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness between 16th August 2021 and 2nd January 2022 –
The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately it also shows how short lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between week 49 and 52.
The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance among all age groups in England between 16th Aug 21 and 2nd Jan 22 –
As you can see from the above the 40-49 year-olds had the worst immune system performance by the 2nd Jan 22, recorded at minus-60%. In Exhibit C we shows that the immune system performance in 40-49-year-olds had declined to minus-67.7% by the 30th January 22. This therefore proves the Covid-19 vaccines are causing damage to the natural immune system that worsens by the week.
Exhibit E
UK data shows the Fully Vaccinated are now more likely to die of Covid-19
The following chart shows the Covid-19 death-rates per 100,000 by vaccination status for each age group over the age of 18 in England, calculated from the number of deaths found in the week 5 UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report and the size of the double vaccinated population –
The double vaccinated population have the highest death rate per 100k in every age group except for the 18-29, and 40-49-year-olds. But we can expect in coming weeks for that rate to switch among the two anomalies based on Exhibit D proving things get worse for the vaccinated population by the week.
Exhibit F
UK Data shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a real-world Negative Effectiveness against Death
Now that we know the death-rates, we can again use Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula to work out the real-world vaccine effectiveness against death.
Real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against death in England between 3rd Jan and 30th Jan 22 was as low as -110.24% in the over 80’s, -97% in people aged 70-79, and -98.14% on average in all adults over age 18.
But don’t forget, as we proved in Exhibit A, vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
Exhibit G
UK data suggests some of the Elderly may have already developed VAIDS
The following chart shows the fully vaccinated populations immune system performance against death according to the Covid-19 death-rates per 100,000 found in the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 5 – 2022 –
Keeping in line with historical trends that show the Covid-19 vaccines have caused damage to the immune system that worsens by the week we can see that the lowest immune system performance is among those who were vaccinated first, with the over 80’s recording an immune system performance of -52.4%, and then the 70-79 age group recording an immune system performance of -49.2%.
There is however a concerning anomaly in this data in that we should expect to see a positive immune system performance among the 30-39 age group of around 29%, but instead it is currently at -15.4%. There could be several explanations for this but none of them are good.
Either the 30-39 year-olds are genuinely doing worse, or all other age groups are doing much worse than what we are being told.
Either way we can be sure that the data is reliably telling us the Covid-19 injections have caused some of the elderly and vulnerable to lose all immune system capability to the point that they are now more likely to die of Covid-19 than an unvaccinated person.
Exhibit H
Public Health Scotland data shows the Fully Vaccinated are now more likely to die of Covid-19
Public Health Scotland publish a weekly Covid-19 Statistical Report containing data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status.
The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in Scotland between 25th Dec 21 and 21st Jan 22, according to the report they published Wednesday 2nd February –
The following graph shows the age standardised Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status in Scotland. The data has been extracted from table 16, found on page 54 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical report published Wednesday 2nd Feb 22.
In the most recent week ending 21st Jan the fully vaccinated were statistically over twice as likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.
The highest death-rate in the past month among the fully vaccinated was recorded as 15.49 per 100,000 individuals in the week beginning 15th Jan. But the highest death rate among the unvaccinated came in the week beginning 8th Jan at 10..93 per 100,000.
Exhibit I
Public Health Scotland Data shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have a real-world Negative Effectiveness against Death
The following chart shows the real-world vaccine effectiveness against death over the past four weeks according to figures supplied by Public Health Scotland –
Vaccine effectiveness against death has been negative since at least Dec 25th, and has dropped to a staggering minus-112% as of the 21st Jan 22.
But again don’t forget, as we proved in Exhibit A, vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
Exhibit J
Public Health Scotland data suggests some of the Fully Vaccinated may have already developed VAIDS
The following chart shows the average immune system performance of all fully vaccinated adults against death between 15th Jan and 21st Jan 22 according to figures supplied by Public Health Scotland –
The average immune system performance against death among all adults equates to -53% in Scotland, which is slightly ahead of the average -50% seen in England as presented in Exhibit G. Because vaccination began at the same time we would expect these to be around the same.
This therefore means that we can be assured the data is reliably telling us the Covid-19 injections are not just ineffective, but damage the immune system to the point that the recipients are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and are much more likely to die than the unvaccinated population.
Exhibit K
Government of Canada Data confirms the Covid-19 Vaccines are decimating the Immune Sytem
The following chart shows the number of cases by vaccination status between 5th Dec 21 and 15th Jan 22, once we simply subtract the 4th Dec figures from the 15th Jan figures in the Government of Canada Covid-19 Daily Epidemiological Updates –
In Canada, according to the 4th Dec report, 22.2 million people are at least double vaccinated, and 23.2 million people are at least partly vaccinated. According to official statistics, the population of Canada in 2020 was estimated to be 38.01 million.
Therefore, because 23.1 million people in Canada have had at least a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, this leaves approximately 14.81 million people in Canada who are not vaccinated against Covid-19.
The following chart shows the Covid-19 case-rate per 100k by vaccination status in Cnada based on the population size and the case numbers provided above –
The following chart shows the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness in Canada betwen 5th Dec 21 and 15th Jan 22 based on the case-rate figures above –
But don’t forget, as we proved in Exhibit A, vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
The following chart shows the immune system performance of the fully vaccinated population in Canada between 5th Dec 21 and 15th Jan 22 –
The average fully vaccinated Canadian is down to the last 18.45% of their immune system for fighting certain classes of viruses and certain cancers etc. This is what vaccination has done to the people of Canada.
Exhibit L
The Fully Vaccinated are incapable of producing N antibodies
The UK Health Security Agency has found the vaccine interferes with the body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
Exhibit M
Scientific Study finds the Covid-19 Vaccines suppress the innate Immune System
The study titled ‘Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs‘ was published on the 21st Jan 22, and presents a raft of evidence that the genetic modifications introduced by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines have diverse consequences to human health.
- a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease;
- myocarditis;
- immune thrombocytopenia;
- Bell’s palsy;
- liver disease;
- impaired adaptive immunity;
- increased production or formation of a tumour or tumours;
- and DNA damage
A full breakdown of the study can be read here.
Exhibit N
Scientific Study finds Covid-19 Vaccine linked Cancer Rates are sky high
The following table taken from the study in Exhibit L shows the number of events in the VAERS database from 1990 to 12th Dec 2021, where several terms indicating cancer occurred in association with the Covid-19 vaccine or with all other available vaccines, along with the ratio between the two counts.
There were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphomawere associated with COVID-19 vaccines.
Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19 vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in the study authors opinions constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation.
This cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNAvaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations.
We know this because CDC data shows that between 2008 and 2020 over 1.72 billion doses of the flu vaccine were administered in the USA. Whereas from the start of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign up to 28th Jan 22 there were a total of 549.9 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccine administered in the USA.
The reason for this increase in rates of cancer linked to vaccination could well be because the Covid-19 vaccines are decimating the innate immune system as we’ve proved in several Exhibits. By doing so the immune system is unable to fight other infections that can cause cancer.
For instance, HPV (human papillomavirus) infection has been linked to certain head and neck cancers, anal, and cervical cancer, as well as many other kinds of cancer. Lymphoma has been linked to viral infections, too.
You can read a full list of AIDS-related cancers here.
Closing Arguments
Official Government data from England, Scotland and Canada proves that the Covid-19 injections have a real-world negative effectiveness.
But vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
This means the fully vaccinated population immune systems are actually inferior to the natural immune systems of the unvaccinated population.
But as we’ve clearly shown this immune system degradation is something that is getting worse by the week, and has now started to result in a negative immune system performance against death among the elderly and vulnerable in England and Scotland.
A recent scientific study has also found that the Covid-19 vaccines suppress the innate immune system with genetic modifications introduced by the jabs having diverse consequences to human health that include immune thrombocytopenia and myocarditis. Both of which are autoimmune diseases.
The same study also found an increased production or formation of tumours, which is again linked to a supressed immune system that is incapable of combating certain viruses that can cause cancer.
AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is the name used to describe a number of potentially life-threatening infections and illnesses that happen when your immune system has been severely damaged.
People with acquired immune deficiency syndrome are at an increased risk for developing certain cancers and for infections that usually occur only in individuals with a weak immune system.
We therefore propose that the Covid-19 injections are causing either acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or a new novel condition with similar attributes than can only be described as Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
Please reference all the articles you use in the Closing Arguments.
Google pay 390$ reliably my last paycheck was $55000 working 10 hours out of consistently on the web. My increasingly youthful w kinfolk mate has been averaging 20k all through continuous months and he works around 24 hours reliably. I can’t trust how direct it was once I attempted it out. This is my essential concern…:) GOOD LUCK
For more info visit………….. https://Www.SmartPay1.com
ymd,ydr
I earned $5000 last month by using the use of working on-line most effective for five to eight hours on my computer and this turned into so clean that i in my view could not receive as proper with earlier than working on this internet site. in case you too need to earn this kind of huge coins then come and be a part of us. try this internet-website on-line……….. https://Www.PAYCASH1.com
I am making a good salary from home $1200-$2500/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible ADt economy. I thank God oy every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to and pay it forward and share it with And Everyone, Here For MORE INFO PLEASE Just check this SITE……. https://Www.jobsRevenue.com
My last pay check was $99000 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. u can also do it by vising following website.☛☛☛☛☛☛☛☛ https://www.pays11.com
I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>> https://Www.NETCASH1.Com
My only remaining questions are:
1. where does this lowering of performance of the immune system end?
2. To what extend does this lower performance also apply to other virusses, bacteria and anything the immune system protects us from?
If it’s only the coronavirus, which is dramatically less dangerous in its latest form, then things could be not too bad after all.
If this applies to everything the immune system is supposed to do then this is ‘The End’…
Earn income while simply working online. work from home whenever you want. just for maximum 2 hours a day you can make more than $500 per day online. from this i made $17632 last month in my spare time.
.
check info here. ==-==>> https://topjobs01.Tk
Hey Petra I can answer this for you, although I’m not quite sure you’ll believe me. This article is pure bullshit. The “lost immunity” is not actually your immune system getting weaker it is just your immune system forgetting how to deal with the virus, it has nothing to do with its strength. What they claim in this article is like if you were to forget something that you learned in high school and someone told you that because you forgot that your brain function literally has become lower. This is not the case however, your brain is just as functional as it was before you forgot said thing as it is after. Also the “math” that they try to do is completely incorrect, even doing it in their biased manner correctly the answer is different although it is negative. The reason I want to point out the biased math is because no where in this article do they mention the percentage of the UK population that is vaccinated, it is around 73%. When you take this into account it becomes clear that obviously most of the cases are going to be vaccinated people as that’s most of the population. The only actual scientific argument I could see coming from this is that it seems the immunity of those who are double vaxxed is waning and you should get another dose to keep your immunity up. There is a plethora of other misinformation/bias information in this article that I would be happy to address in the future however I don’t want to write too much in one message.
HOWEVER, you seem to ignore the fact that these experimental injections, that have not been fully tested or followed up, the contents of which are not fully declared, and the contracts with which they are associated have been redacted, and the available data fled with the FDA being withheld, are supposed to be protective against further ‘infection’…. they clearly are not – and the data, which we know to be but a fraction of the true numbers show that the injections cause very significant side-effects and death in numbers that would have halted ANY other drug being trialled within weeks…. these are undisputed facts.
What you’re saying makes sense at face value, however, within this article if you had simply looked at all the charts, clearly you would have seen that there are two charts that reveal the COV case/death rate per 100k (see the second data chart under Exhibit K for Canada, as well as the second chart under Exhibit H for Scotland). This correctly represents the data of case/death rate amongst vaccinated vs unvaccinated (regardless of what percentage the majority is vaccinated).
I may have missed it in the article, but I don’t think confounding variables such as the demographics of the vaxxed and unvaxxed populations are accounted for. Older people are both more likely to be vaccinated and to die from COVID.
Sorry but your analysis is bullshit. Yes there are more vaccinated than unvaccinated, but they account for that in the cases/100K. That’s why it’s called the rate and not actual numbers. Also they do not delve into all cause mortality in this article which is much higher in the vaccinated population(2-3x). This is either due to direct death to vaccination or succumbing to Covid or secondary disease, likely related to adverse effects on immune/cardiovascular/neurologic systems. The way the jab adversely effects the immune system is it primes for the original spike protein(that your body is instructed to produce which is highly risky to begin with) and instructs immune system to ignore other viruses and yes, cancer cells as well.The mass vaccination during pandemic actually drove the virus to mutate more rapidly than it would have normally. The jab, when initially given, has to trick the immune system by circumventing the Toll like receptor cells to enter the body. These cells are responsible for detecting pathogens such as virus, bacteria and cancer cells. So for periods of time your immune system is down regulated against other pathogens. Nobody knows how long because of course it hasn’t been tested correctly. If you really recommend continuing to get jabbed for a virus that is man-made/manipulated, will constantly mutate, has a large reservoir in the environment so it is and will stay omnipresent, really only adversely effects the extreme elderly and those with 4+ comorbidities, and has the worst safety profile/adverse events record of any vaccine ever created, then you must be in the mass formation psychosis group or you work for Pharma. Ah yes, and you also use the good little fascist word misinformation so you can conform and attempt to pressure people to comply with your Ministry of Truth. You really should get on the Way Back Machine and go back to 1984..you’d be so much happier.
Take a look at the UK government post they quote, page 47. The vaccinated are getting infected at a higher rate than the unvaccinated, but despite that the unvaccinated have a much higher death rate in every age group. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1052353/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_5.pdf
The death rates figures for the vaccinated in this article have been changed to make it look like you’re more likely to die of Covid if you are vaccinated, when the exact opposite is true.
I take it you meant to write “more likely to die of Covid if you are unvaccinated, when the opposite is true”?
I, too, saw the UK “Roadmap to Recovery” document early last year before it was reported that vaccines would fall short of the ultimate goal of creating herd immunity (in turn necessary to end the pandemic vs. see COVID-19 become endemic).
It’s amazing how the UK model predicted that by the end of 2021 60-70% of cases would be among the fully vaccinated — before anybody understood that vaccine immunity would wane as quickly as it did.
I suspect this foreknowledge has to do with the underlying research that has been done on mRNA technology coupled with the fact that no “common cold” virus has been vaccinated against in the past with any success regardless of vaccine type. Certain types of viruses do not produce durable immunity such as HIV, malaria, etc. It is likely that they understood from the outset that coronaviruses land in this group.
To the challenge of trying to vaccinate against a virus that doesn’t even yield “permanent” immunity following natural infection, and add in the fact that you’re attempting to use a novel mRNA vaccine to combat it and it’s arguably the scientific equivalent of Mission Impossible. One can find articles dating back to 2015, after research involving vaccines for chicken was published, in which researchers expressed concern for “next generation vaccines” (mRNA/DNA) and the potential for more virulent mutations to emerge in connection with reliance on leaky (non-sterilizing) vaccines.
Clearly, they had reason to expect an imperfect outcome — as much if not more so than even flu vaccines. Flu vaccines are always guesses based on which strain will predominate in a given flu season. COVID-19 vaccines will apparently be the same.
After the UK models began to be noticed on social media, the fact checkers came out in droves to remind us that if a greater share of the population is vaccinated, then obviously most cases will be among the vaccinated — case closed. (Or not!)
Perhaps the better explanation is one of false advertising — one might even say a necessary evil to get the population on board with a high vaccination rate in the misplaced HOPE of beating the Mission Impossible odds. Calling something “highly effective” when that success (increased COVID-19 antibodies) is too fleeting by any kind of desirable immunity standard pretty much sums up the problem. It’s one thing to understand that these vaccines were in an uphill battle to produce durable immunity against a coronavirus, another thing to see immunity among the vaccinated drop off within ~2 months with no potential — even in the case of mandates — move the needle on herd immunity. It is time for Western media to stop circulating the wagons for 2020 variant-mismatched vaccines and admit we need better early interventions for COVID-19 treatment because placing all our eggs in a single “vaccine basket” has failed us.
The only thing I would point out, Merick, is that we tend to look only at ourselves at the expense of a data pool that is global. COVID-19 should be killing off vast swaths of the unvaccinated planet yet these waves have impacted highly vaccinated countries the worst. This could be partially explained by the assumption that it is uncommon to reach an advanced age (high risk level) in countries with poor medical infrastructure. Moreover, higher birthrates mean that more people in sub-Saharan African and the Third World will tend to be younger than the average of of someone living in a Western country, in turn contributing to lower risk of death from COVID-19.
Having said that, even if one were to normalize for the above factors, it DOES seem that the more vaccinated the country’s population the more deaths by COVID-19. With access to better nutrition and better medical care, one would not expect this even if citizens in Western countries are older on average than their counterparts throughout much of the world.
What else could explain “highly effective vaccines” failing to reduce last year’s COVID-19 death rates, which, in fact, were higher in the U.S. than the pre-vaccination stage of the pandemic?
My own theory is that a 2 dimensional modeling of the data on a graph or a spreadsheet style chart is obscuring the realization that there is a mathematical boomerang in effect. Vaccine effectiveness is calculated when the vaccines are at their zenith. But if within approximately eight weeks they begin to wane, it should still not be the case that the previously vaccinated are more vulnerable to hospitalization and/or infection as compared to those who never got vaccinated at all. (To be clear, the prevailing consensus is that the vaccinated are less likely to become seriously ill but it would also appear that the unvaccinated/non-immunocompromised are less likely to become sick in the first place.)
It’s difficult to ignore that innate immunity may be impaired, as some studies have suggested, because it is the best explanation for why the data boomerangs from better protection vs. unvaccinated to worse vs. unaccinated within a matter of months. All the data is there for the taking but two things are in play A) the implications are too horrifying to take seriously, B) the way we map out data in a 2-dimensional, linear fashion MAY be contributing to the old problem of “not seeing the forest for the trees”. However, I am not a computer scientist or mathemetician so I’ll leave it to others to figure out why the current approach to mapping out epidemiological data may be contributing to the inability to make sense of these seemingly disconnected data point “dots”.
So can you get this from sleeping with a vaccinated person???
I don’t think these people can understand logic…or ever took a science or statistics class. There are so many errors here my head wanted to explode.
Good job boiling it down. The internet has given this nonsense / fear mongering a platform and I don’t think we’re ever coming back from it.
In 2022, start earning cash from your home and getting paid(500$ to 700$ / hour ) by this job. These are the best online jobs I’ve made $84, 8254 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.
Join it today here.. ______ http://www.flyercash3.com
From the start of the covid injection rollout the warning bells were being rung…..
https://rivercitymalone.com/health/covid-vaccine-the-problem-of-antibody-dependent-enhancement/
Great Summary of the State of the Vaccinated so far. I find for the prosecution. And I sentence all doctors who continue to vaccinate people, to be vaccinated themselves quarterly in perpetuity – oh no, wait a minute, the death penalty has been abolished. Damn. OK I sentence all doctors and chemists and nurses who continue to vaccinate from this day forward to have their medical licences revoked and to be put in jail for the same period of time that a crack cocaine dealer would get for selling his pharmaceutical to the number of clients that they vaccinated. Because that is what they have become.
Ah No I have a better idea. I hereby sentence all NHS administrators to go to prison for the precise period of time that they have been NHS administrators. And I sentence all the doctors who continue to vaccinate people to lose their practicing licences and be forced to become NHS administrators!
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/ […]
[…] – INVESTIGATION: The Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS; here’s all the evidence… […]
Seriously paycheck of $196 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily. simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing. Try now……………… https://Www.Cash46.Com
Many of the exhibits (but not the ones related to death and cancers) could also be explained by the vaccine just increasing your likelyhood for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 gene fragments . If you increase the body’s production of spike protein it makes sense that your are more likely to register as a positive case using antigen or PCR tests.
Is there not a glaring mathematical error in these calculations? Correct me if I’m wrong but without factoring in the vaccination rate, these calculations are very misleading. As soon as you include the vaccination rate, the numbers suggest that the double vaccinated are at about the same risk for getting covid as the unvaccinated but somewhat protected from hospitalization and certainly from death. And triple vaccinated are more protected in every metric.
Yes you are correct, very astute statement!
No, like I’ve said to Merick, if you had simply looked at all the charts, clearly you would have seen that there are two charts that reveal the COV case/death rate per 100k (see the second data chart under Exhibit K for Canada, as well as the second chart under Exhibit H for Scotland). This correctly represents the data of case/death rate amongst vaccinated vs unvaccinated (regardless of what percentage the majority is vaccinated).
I get paid more than $90 to $120 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $12k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… https://www.LiveJob247.com
Great article
It is CVID……Common variable immuno deficiency. Not AIDS. THEY HID IT IN PLAIN SIGHT!! CVID IS COVID! Soylent green is people.
[…] Все графики и ссылки тут: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/ […]
[…] Read More: The Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS; here’s all the evidence […]
How have you worked out the calculation in the week 5 report for death per 100k?
[…] L’Exposé presenta una serie di prove evidenti che i vaccini Covid-19 stanno inducendo i riceventi a sviluppare la sindrome da immunodeficienza acquisita (AIDS) o una nuova condizione con attributi simili che può essere descritta solo come Sindrome da immunodeficienza acquisita indotta da vaccino Covid-19 (VAIDS ). Vedi l’articolo completo, inclusi i grafici, qui. […]
[…] El Exposé presenta una serie de pruebas sólidas de que las vacunas contra el covid-19 están provocando que los receptores desarrollen el síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida (SIDA) o una nueva afección con atributos similares que solo puede describirse como síndrome de inmunodeficiencia adquirida inducido por la vacuna contra el covid-19 (VAIDS). ). Vea el artículo completo, incluidos los gráficos, aquí. […]
[…] INVESTIGATION: The Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS; here’s all the evidence… (Daily Exposé) […]
[…] Blestematele seruri anti-ceva-care-nu-a-fost-izolat pînă acum, au un efect concret: suprimarea imunității naturale pînă la punctul la care cei care s-au injectat, dezvoltă Sindromul auto-imun cunoscut ca SIDA doar că cu ajutorul serurilo…. […]
[…] datos recopilados por el Exposición diaria compuesto de documentación del gobierno, la inmunidad de la vacuna no puede disminuir. El sistema […]
[…] to data compiled by the Daily Expose composed of government documentation, vaccine immunity cannot wane. The human immune system, […]
[…] FEBRUARY 13, 2022 […]
Global elites paving the way for their NWO, we were told but nobody listened to the whistleblowers.
It’s a Biblical thing anyhow, and is prophetically arranged to happen, which no one believes, so there’s no hope for this ignorant world.
[…] to data compiled by the Daily Expose composed of government documentation, vaccine immunity cannot wane. The human immune system, […]
[…] Источник со всеми ссылками и графиками здесь (https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/) […]
[…] Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS and cancer. The effectiveness of the vaccine is not actually manifested in the vaccine itself, it is measured by the work of the immune system of the vaccinated person compared to the work of the immune system of an unvaccinated person. The first time an organism encounters a microbe, it may take several days to create and use all the microbial control tools necessary to overcome the infection. After infection, the immune system remembers what it has learned about how to protect the body from this disease. Vaccines supposedly help develop immunity by simulating an infection. As soon as the imitation of the infection caused by the vaccine passes, there is a stock of “memory” T cells and antibodies in the body that will remember how to fight this disease in the future. Thus, when the government claims that the effectiveness of vaccines weakens over time, it actually means that the effectiveness of the immune system weakens over time. https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/ […]
[…] Fonte […]
[…] Evidence set that Covid-19 vaccines are causing recipients to develop acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or a new condition with similar attributes that can only be described as Covid-19 vaccine-induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS) Vaccines supposedly help build immunity by mimicking an infection. Once the imitation of the vaccine-induced infection disappears, the body is left with a supply of “memory” T cells and antibodies that will remember how to fight that disease in the future. So when the authorities say that vaccine effectiveness weakens over time, what they really mean is that the performance of the immune system weakens over time. https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/ […]
[…] Source: INVESTIGATION: The Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS; here’s all the evidence… […]
I’m looking right now at the UK surveillance report you quote, for week 5 of 2022, page 47. Your figures in Exhibit E for infections are correct and for deaths the unvaccinated, but for vaccinated deaths are all wrong. Despite the fact that a greater proportion (roughly X2) of vaccinated are currently catching the virus, the unvaccinated have between 6 and 10 times the death rate for every age group 40+, disproving the very claim you are making.
I have heard that the risk of death is 22x higher among the unvaccinated. However, data out of Israel led the way in showing that there were two opposing trends at work. The unvaccinated have an apparent innate immunity advantage there but if and when they do get sick, the vaccinated have a survival advantage because their antibody response is primed and ready to go. Omicron may unravel this assumption but the vaccine advantage was still in play under Delta.
Recently the Los Angeles County Public Health Department apparently released data showing that vaccinated patients were 10% more likely to be among those hospitalized. Meanwhile in much of the less developed world where vaccines have been far less accessible, it is not the horrific COVID-19 tragedy one might expect. The only way one can explain the totality of the data is that the vaccines are simultaneously boosting one aspect of the immune system (antibodies to COVID-19) at the ultimate expense of other aspects of the immune system (i.e. innate immunity).
I picture this situation much like boarding an elevator full of people some of whom have pressed the “up” button (antibodies) while others (also vaccinated but on the downside of waning immunity) have pressed the “down” button. Eventually the elevator is going to head down to the lower floors. It may stop at other floors along the way as more people step on who are trying to go up a floor (i.e. boosted) but what goes up must come down and, in this case, the downside may not be any more ideal than the result of refusing to vaccinate on the front end. There is more than road to the same destination in which COVID-19 still has the upper hand.
For the above reasons, I hope that two things will ultimately dawn on the public and our public health establishments:
1) Vaccines should never have been pitted in a false-choice competition against early interventions, many of which landed on the back burner or were attacked outright in fear they represented an obstruction on the path to mass vaccination. As COVID-19 moves to an endemic phase we need to embrace HOME treatments for people who contract COVID-19.
2) it is time to push our respective leaders for an international ban on gain-of-function research. As deadly, disruptive and uncertain as the origin of this virus may remain, this pandemic is nonetheless a wake-up call: COVID-19 is NOTHING compared to how deadly a pandemic could emerge if the practice of using humanized lab animals to amplify virulence continues. Researchers have other options today that did not exist years ago when gain-of-function was justified by Dr. Fauci/Collins as a necessary evil in view of what could emerge from nature. Today we have AI and predictive computer modeling that can and should serve to eliminate the risks of gain-of-function research as we’ve known it for the past 30+ years. Spend any time investigating how many close calls have happened in conjunction with CDC labs let alone the Wuhan lab, and one will understand immediately WHY President Obama attempted to impose a ban on domestic research, which Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins skirted by sending taxpayer funds to EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn outsourced what could no longer be performed domestically to China. President Obama was on the right track back in 2014 when he tried to put an end to lab accidents supplanting “nature” when it comes to the risk of unleashing global pandemics. Unlike nature, a souped-up virus may emerge from a lab primed for a “maximum kill rate”, whether by accident or biowarefare.
If there remains any doubt, look how the world turned upside down for a 1-2% risk of death from COVID-19? Whether there is any official pronouncement that COVID-19 emerged from the Wuhan lab is now beyond the point: The world has been put on notice by this pandemic that we cannot afford to look the other way anymore.
[…] INVESTIGATION: The Covid-19 Vaccines cause AIDS; here’s all the evidence… ..Here we present a series of strong evidence that the Covid-19 vaccines are causing recipients to develop acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or a novel condition with similar attributes that can only be described as Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS). […]
[…] Source: DailyExpose […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] News) Evidence continues to mount showing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] There was strong evidence that the Covid-19 vaccines were causing recipients to develop acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or a novel condition with similar attributes that could only be described as Covid-19 Vaccine Induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS). https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/13/the-covid-19-vaccines-cause-aids/ […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
I’d contribute if I could afford it. I thank you for your work. It’s tops.
[…] continues to mountshowing that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are causing recipients everywhere to […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]
[…] website known as The Expose (UK) found that covid vaccines demonstrate negative effectiveness, meaning they cause illness rather […]