Download the letter of objection to WHO’s pandemic treaty to send to your government representative HERE.
Global public health, previously focused on community-based participation and poverty reduction, has moved over the past 2 decades to a centralised, corporatised paradigm promoting pharmaceutical-based solutions in an increasingly vertical system. This is being justified by a health catastrophe/pandemic preparedness campaign that uses fear and targeted funding to overcome its obvious fallacies.
Pandemics Data & Analytics (“PANDA”) believes that this must be addressed urgently and systematically to expose the falsehoods on which the approach is based. This will undermine the drivers of the centralisation of wealth and power that this corporate takeover of global health is supporting, which must then lead to fundamental reform of public health funding, conflict of interest management, and decentralisation of health policy.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
By David Bell
The Pandemic Preparedness Fallacy
A myth of growing pandemic risk has been promulgated over the past two decades, coincident with growing corporate/private funding and influence over the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) and the global health area in general. This is being used to leverage unprecedented funds directed to a mainly Western-centred industry growing around ‘pandemic preparedness’. It is, essentially, a massive shift in wealth through ‘aid’ funding, from Western taxpayers to Pharma-related entities, at the expense of these taxpayers, and the populations of low-income countries to whom aid was previously, at least nominally, directed. Large corporate structures, especially the World Economic Forum (“WEF”), have been very prominent, perhaps instrumental in this.
Pandemic Preparedness: The Facts
Pandemics are not increasing. However, viruses are detected more readily through surveillance (e.g., the use of PCR to increase reported Covid-19 cases). The WHO records only 4 pandemics in the 120 years prior to Covid-19.
Pandemics are not getting worse. None since 1918-19 (including Covid-19) have had a major impact on overall mortality (and especially not among young and middle-aged people). It is generally considered that most deaths in 1918-19 were caused by secondary infections due to a lack of antibiotics then. Advancements in medical care including the availability of a wide range of therapeutics have substantially reduced the risk of mortality.
Human contact with wildlife is not increasing. This is an obvious fallacy but widely used to justify greater funding for pandemic preparedness. Humans have lived closely with domesticated animals for thousands of years, and traded and trapped in the wilderness. There is now far less wilderness, far less wildlife, and human contact with wild animals is concentrated in fewer areas.
Large historic outbreaks were probably bacterial. Bubonic plague is a bacterial disease (Yersinia pestis – the cause of the Black Death and Jusitinan plagues among other outbreaks). Cholera was a major cause of outbreaks in several countries during the 19th century. The most deaths in the last high-mortality pandemic, the 1918-19 Spanish flu, are thought to be due to bacterial secondary infections. We now have antibiotics and knowledge of clean water that will prevent a recurrence.
Costs of Pandemic Preparedness
The WHO Director-General (Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, 18 February at Munich Conference) stated that $31B/year is warranted for pandemic preparedness (to be ready for the ‘next one’). Bill Gates Jr. has talked about $3B/year for a ‘WHO-like body’ to coordinate. In context, the Global Fund spends less than $4B/year on malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS combined. The annual WHO budget is roughly $3B.
In global health terms, this is a staggering amount of money. Tuberculosis (TB) kills ~1.6M every year, at a far younger mean age than Covid-19. Malaria kills nearly 400,000/year, mostly young children. Spending on each of these globally is in the $3B/year range. Converting recorded mortality to normal disease burden metrics – disability-adjusted life years (“DALYs”), each of these has roughly a 10 times greater burden annually in sub-Saharan Africa.
Read the full article ‘Corporate Dominance in Global Public Health: The WHO International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty’ HERE.
Letter template to raise an objection to the proposed pandemic treaty of the World Health Organisation
The proposed International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness builds on the growing reach of the International Health Regulations, in transferring more power to WHO to declare emergencies and then require countries, under treaty obligations, to follow WHO instructions.
This proposed treaty raises a number of fundamental concerns that we believe should lead to its immediate abandonment. Read more about why the WHO pandemic treaty must be stopped in the introduction to a letter objecting to the pandemic treaty prepared by David Bell and published by PANDA.
Please use this letter as a template to write to your Member(s) of Parliament to alert them to your concerns regarding the proposed WHO pandemic treaty. The letter is intended to stimulate discussion within parliaments on key issues. The concerns raised should be relevant irrespective of the attitudes of the Member to efficacy of various aspects of the Covid-19 response.
It is essential that debate moves on from disagreement on specific public health interventions, and addresses the longer-term issues of sovereignty and risks of conflict of interest. There are ways for countries to cooperate together in public health without subverting laws and democratic processes that many have fought to achieve over previous centuries.
Download the letter of objection to WHO’s pandemic treaty to send to your government representative HERE.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] The Proposed WHO Pandemic “Treaty” Is A Major Threat To Global Health And Human Rights -TAKE ACT… […]
[…] Source link […]
News from Underground USA…
[…] !! The Proposed WHO Pandemic “Treaty” Is A Major Threat To Global Health And Human Rights -TAKE ACT… BY RHODA […]
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
believes that this must be addressed urgently and systematically to expose the falsehoods on which the approach is based. This will undermine the drivers of the centralisation of wealth and power that this corporate takeover of global health is supporting, which must then lead to fundamental reform of public health funding, conflict of interest management, and decentralisation of health policy.
[…] Rhoda Wilson: […]
Thank you for your efforts to urgently raise global awareness of this horrific movement that our conflicted and corrupted Governments are committing global communities to.
These filthy politicians know damn well the masses would never agree to this EXTREME madness if it were put to referendums around the world.
As such, it must be stopped.
This one was initiated as “the global virome project” by the Rockefellas so you know its nasty!!! I covered it in a cast over a year back – PANDEMICS WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION I termed it then, as part of that project they state that they intend to find every dangerous animal virus [and make them transmissible to humans in the laboratory], and ramp-up surveillance – to track the animals obviously. Then again what are we – it’s all coming and it’s inescapable barring a huge natural disaster or nukes….we’ll have to wait until 2027 for the A.I. catastrophetosaveourbacon – hurry up Roy-y-y-y-y!!!
It nasty because pathogenic viruses don’t exist. Nor animal viruses modified to hit humans. It’s all a big lie. Even Pasteur couldn’t cause rabies without injecting the rotten brain tissue of dead animal into the HEAD OF A DOG. Because he never could prove transmission.
Why not simply demand proof of existence of any virus??
Doesn’t matter what they sign as long as the majority know that there are no pathogenic viruses only exosomes, that it’s a con and always was, that there is a poison around, etc. Have a look what happening in Shanghai!!! Children are separated from parents, dragged and put in camps alone, toddlers in a country which is famous about human trafficking and organ harvesting. Ask yourself why it was so important to the Johnson gov. that they modified the donor law during the first faked wave? Now they have everyone’ DNA due to intensive ‘testing’.
This is why I dared to tell since the beginning, that this is why so dangerous to run and support the virus CON. There is no proof for spike protein, only for graphene oxide and nanotech – those so called ‘our friends’ docs like Malone are telling porkies. We lost 2 years waiting for Fuellmich ‘Grand Jury’ who – very interestingly by he way because not an ignorant man – let this part go and chose his witness among those who were pursuing the virus tale only.
Malone, Mikovits, McCullough, Cole and the rest are either have pathetic knowledge on it or controlled opposition. As long as the virus legend lives it never will be over, never. They can poison masses, clusters of people anytime and can lie a big one about viruses – see the monkey-pox tale. If no virus then no base for a WHO treaty either.
Take time to watch the debate on viruses and DISTRIBUTE IT AND DISTRIBUTE IT FAST.
Thumb me down all you like, but here you go….
The U.S. Constitution stands in the way of this agenda, as do the constitutions of many other countries. Because of this, the WHO World Health Assembly is convening on May 22 to vote on abolishing all nation-states and merging them into a global governance structure in which the WHO makes everyone’s medical decisions.
“If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries, these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022),” warned En-Volve.com about how soon this could all transpire.
You better get those letters off to your MP’s double-FAST!!!
It’s hopeless, you’re hippies not soldiers, you can’t go to war because you’re ‘shit’ as my Great Grandad would definitely say. See you in the post-apoc. I’ll be Tina Turner!!!
[…] Read More: The Proposed WHO Pandemic “Treaty” Is A Major Threat To Global Health And Human Right… […]
There are two important things, I am curious will the Expose, our friend pursue these or remain silent on it…
Scientist – real scientist – have made the MAC address puzzle, that – if anyone was not yet aware, the vaccinated people emit / have MAC address now due to the injected, self assembling nanotech, the reason why injecting even toddlers was so important to the cabal. The scientist list at the end of the video is 5 f…ing minutes long! People ‘in resistance’ worked hard and what they are found – the purpose of injecting with this is horrifying to say the least. On my part: I saw these addresses only with old Androids or with the help of an application named Bluetooth Scanner, the video offer other ways to see them. “REVIEW: The MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications“
The good news: La Quinta Columna it looks has found a solution to eliminate, dismantle the nanorouter in the vaxxed, at the end of their short video there is a drawing showing the details of the tool that it can be built by others. Professionals among us should be cared, without the router their control is over, over the vaxxed bodies.
“Frying intracorporal nano and micro routers (EMP)“
Have you seen this article published in The Expose a couple of days ago?
Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses; What’s Causing This Phenomenon?
how do we get all Europe organized against this?