Breaking News

Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccinated Children are 13,633% more likely to die of COVID than Unvaccinated Children

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A report quietly published by the UK Government, just hours before Boris Johnson announced he was resigning as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, reveals the Covid-19 injections are proving to have negative effectiveness against death among children in England.

With the most recent figures showing triple vaccinated children aged 10 to 14 are a shocking 13,633.33% / 137.3x more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


On the 7th July, Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, announced he was resigning. Since then the Mainstream Media in the UK have distracted the public with 24/7 news on that announcement and speculation on who could replace him.

It’s times like these that you ought to watch what bad news is being quietly published in the background in the hope that it won’t receive much attention.

It just so happens that hours before Boris announced his resignation, his Government published new data that is devastating for both parents and children.

A UK Government agency, known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), has just published data on deaths by vaccination status in England.

The latest dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.

Table 6 of the dataset contains data on deaths involving Covid-19 by age group in England between 1st January 2021 and 31st May 2022, and it includes the number of deaths among children aged 10 to 14.

However, it is quite clear from the data that the ONS are not being as transparent as we would like to believe. This is because they fail to provide the death rate per 100,000 person-years among children, whereas they have provided it for all other age groups in every other table contained in the dataset.

For example, here’s a snapshot of the data from table 1 of the dataset showing the death rate per 100,000 person-years by vaccination status in April 2022 –

Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on which way you choose to look at it, the ONS still provides enough information for us to calculate the COVID death rate among children ourselves, and it is horrific.

Here’s a snapshot of the ONS data on Covid-19 deaths among children aged 10 to 14 between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st May 2022 by vaccination status –

The data above includes the number of deaths and the number of person-years among each vaccination group. Therefore, all we need to do is divide each vaccination group’s person-years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths among each vaccination group by the answer to the previous equation, to work out the COVID death rates.

e.g. Unvaccinated 2,881,265 Person-years / 100,000 = 28.81
Unvaccinated Covid-19 Deaths (9) / 28.81 = 0.3 Deaths per 100,000 person-years

The following chart shows the calculated Covid-19 death rate per 100,000 person-years among children aged 10 to 14 in England between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st May 2022 –

As you can see the rates are horrendous. With a death rate of 3.2 among the partly vaccinated, and a death rate of 41.2 per 100k among the triple vaccinated, compared to just 0.3 per 100k among the unvaccinated.

Based on Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula, this data reveals that the Covid-19 injections are now proving to have negative effectiveness against death among children, with the real-world effectiveness between January 2021 and May 2022 being as follows –

Formula:
Unvaccinated Death Rate – Vaccinated Death Rate
/
Unvaccinated Death Rate x 100 =
Vaccine Effectiveness against Death

Put plain and simply, the above means vaccinated children are more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children. Unfortunately, though, this increased risk of death is earth-shattering.

The Covid-19 injections are proving to have real-world negative effectiveness against death of minus-966.67% among partly vaccinated children, and a shocking real-world negative effectiveness against death of minus-13,633.33% among triple vaccinated children.

This isn’t anywhere near the claimed 95% effectiveness against death made by Pfizer, is it?

In other words, partly vaccinated children are 11x/966.67% more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children, and triple vaccinated children are 137.3x/13,633.33% more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children.

The ONS unfortunately still refuses to provide any data on children under the age of 10, despite 5 to 11 year-olds being offered the Covid-19 injection in England since at least January 2022. We dread to think what sort of numbers we would be seeing if they had the decency and nerve to provide it.

The release of this horrific data has also, unfortunately, followed the questionable decision made by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to authorise emergency use of the Covid-19 injection among infants as young as 6 months of age.

Judging by this data that was quietly published by the UK Government just hours before Boris Johnson’s resignation as Prime Minister of the UK to ensure it was swept under the carpet, the people working for the FDA will live to regret that decision.

Share this page to Telegram
3 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

40 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GundelP
GundelP
4 months ago

THERE IS A FAR MORE IMPORTANT NEWS:

https://davidicke.com/2022/07/13/the-truth-is-coming-out-uk-government-considered-tearing-covid-positive-people-from-their-homes-minister-admits-and-discussed-it-with-behavioural-psychologists-to-see-if-they-could-get-away-wit/

The Truth is Coming Out: UK Government Considered Tearing ‘Covid’ Positive People From Their Homes, Minister Admits (and discussed it with behavioural psychologists to see if they could get away with it)”

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
4 months ago

Let’s see names involved, remember them!!!
“…A health minister at the time, Ms. Dorries was approached by former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt and told to adopt this ‘Zero Covid’ approach, she told GB News.
The now-Culture Secretary told Dan Wootton, who decided not to dig deeper into the claims:
[Jeremy] said ‘you’ve got to speak to Matt [Hancock]’. It was at the time Nightingale hospitals were being built. ‘You’ve got to tell him that you don’t put sick people in the hospitals, you follow a “Zero Covid” policy… When someone tests positive, you take them from their home and you take them to an isolation centre and you leave them there… That’s the only way you can beat Covid.’…”

Hunt and Hancock! Would you care to SHOW PROOF YOUR VIRUS EXIST? Also show proof the test is reliable?

PEOPLE wake up or we will live in ‘Shanghai’ in no time.

There IS NO COVID! This is the POISON, which they use to mimic a viral pandemic. UNDERSTAND the details as knowledge the only one which can save you – and SPREAD IT far and wide.

Ricardo Delgado – VACCINES, GRAPHENE Oxide, NANOTECH and 5G”

https://www.brighteon.com/936df8eb-df02-4cc4-bd83-6b14e9cbaa27

jeny
jeny
Reply to  GundelP
4 months ago

I am making a real GOOD MONEY here………… https://cutt.ly/DLcHvJE

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Se også fra engelsk, national statistik: Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccin…. […]

Ronald
Ronald
4 months ago

Though they may be dying at a alarming rate,
Dying of Covid they are not!
Death by government decree…

SASAMI
SASAMI
4 months ago

Let me see Table6 “Count of all cause deaths.”
Death rate per 100,000 for the unvaccinated is 6.386 and 289 for the fully vaccinated.
This suggests that the data for the fully vaccinated is too small to be precise. Not only COVID-death but also non-COVID death is astonishingly high for the fully vaccinated whose data is only 2422 cases.

And please take a look at Table3 which shows deaths involving COVID-19 for them. It seems to be precise cuz amount of data is enough…

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccin…A report quietly published by the UK Government, just hours before Boris Johnson announced he was resigning as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, reveals the Covid-19 injections are proving to have negative effectiveness against death among children in England. […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccin… A report quietly published by the UK Government, just hours before Boris Johnson announced he was resigning as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, reveals the Covid-19 injections are proving to have negative effectiveness against death among children in England. […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] guess is that it was the mRNA vaccine that is the real problem. A new traditional vaccine just came out, and I strongly suspect it won’t have the same […]

John Potash
John Potash
4 months ago

See this film putting Covid in historical context with much focus on 2020 and 2021. See trailer here:https://www.bitchute.com/video/s40yOMitss74/ See whole film for free here: https://tubitv.com/movies/672129/shots-eugenics-to-pandemics?start=true%C2%A0 Available in UK here: https://www.wowhd.co.uk/shots-eugenics-to-pandemics/760137102687

trackback
4 months ago

[…] 新闻来源:Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccin… […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] 新聞來源:Whilst you were distracted by Boris resigning the UK Gov. published a report confirming Fully Vaccin… […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] By The Exposé on July 13, 2022 […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

Laurie
Laurie
4 months ago

Please derive the person-years for us – how were they calculated? In the spreadsheet, they are numbers, not formulas …

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

Proton Magic
Proton Magic
4 months ago

I dont see how they calculated the death rate for triple vaxed…any help?

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK […]

Steve Summers
Steve Summers
4 months ago

There is a discrepancy between the data and conclusions in this July 13 article (Whilst you were distracted…) and the data in the article of July 8: EXCLUSIVE – UK Gov. admits COVID Vaccine is killing Kids after publishing report proving Vaccinated Children are shocking 30,200% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children.

In the July 8th article there is this text and following table, referring to data “on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset”…”between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st March 2022”:

Here are the figures published by the ONS in table 9 for 10 to 14-year-olds –:

(see attached “10-14 year olds, July 8 article UK Gov. admits..png”. I accidently deleted this attached image and thrice tried to reattach it without apparent success, so see this table in that article)

In this, July 13, article (on this page) there is what is apparently the same data:

a snapshot of the ONS data on Covid-19 deaths among children aged 10 to 14 between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st May 2022 by vaccination status –

(see table referred to above, in the “Whilst you were distracted…” article on this page).

The numbers for the person-years for each of the vaccination statuses in the two tables are different. They are not different by even a magnitude but the differences are significant, the numbers in this “Whilst you were…” article always being larger.

The conclusions are also different, the July 8th article (Exclusive – UK Gov. admits…) concluding that with “three doses of a Covid-19 injection” “Vaccinated Children are…30,200% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children” and this July 13th article concluding that “Fully Vaccinated Children are 13,633% more likely to die of COVID than Unvaccinated Children”; 302 times vs 136.33 times.

AndiSho
AndiSho
Reply to  Steve Summers
2 months ago

Well, it is important that we discuss about the negative side effects especially on all cause mortality, whee you can easily catch the existing vaccines based on spike.

IMHO, you have to subtract confounders like: the most vaccinated children are those with KNOWN vulnerabilities. Co-Morbidities.

IMHO, you CAN’T vaccinate INSTABLE immune systems with whatsoever. So the crime remains the same.

But to remain unbiased, we have to sort it out more precise as the collectivistic fulfilment centers called “health” agencies are doing it.

We even have to pay for each other to prove eg some deadly vaccinal injury by collecting private money form the autopsy with fine segments under microscope.

Or for CD profiles and other lab tests like d-dimers, heart parameters, and autoimmune-indicating tests, best BEFORE vaccination, after it, and follow up, if one really wants to get to the base of it.

It is proven that you have a LOT of damage done that fills the bucket, but only if it is full and spills over, you recognise it.

That is why the vaccinal system members can claim “nothing to see here”.

But if you use methods ti measure how full the bucket is, you are there.

One such bucket in physiology is the number of converted, to H1 = pro-inflammatory state, monocytes.

You can even detect the vaccinal spike in them even a year after vaccination, and by mass spectroscopy can identify WHICH spikenitnis, wuhan type vaccinal or from
other variant from infection.

This is why time is running up:
Each vaccinated with ADOPTED spikes will not have monocytes discernible from natural infection, and will by the way contribute to the catastrophe to KILL all spike immunity by up-selecting variants that totally avoid it. Resulting in RESTART of paandemic and high death toll >10% case mortality if untreated early on.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] there could run cover. For every 100,000 kids aged 10 to 14 who were FULLY VACCINATED in England, over 40 died from […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] there could run cover. For every 100,000 kids aged 10 to 14 who were FULLY VACCINATED in England, over 40 died from […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] there could run cover. For every 100,000 kids aged 10 to 14 who were FULLY VACCINATED in England, over 40 died from […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] clearly that the Covid vaccines are injuring and killing our children, explained in further detail here? Analysis of the data shows that a triple-vaccinated 11‑14 year old is 45 times more likely to […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] clearly that the Covid vaccines are injuring and killing our children, explained in further detail here? Analysis of the data shows that a triple-vaccinated 11‑14 year old is 45 times more likely to […]

AndiSho
AndiSho
2 months ago

PLEASE, keep us up-to-date.
What are real-world infection numbers?

Also tell parents to TREAT (topically, in the first line, by 0.1% iodine, 800ppm hypochlorite or 10% xylitol-grapefruit seed extract (15drops/20ml) nasal sprays, also available in pharmacies, alwasy spray breathing in (deep, protects tracheae), spray to nose, throat, and one extra under tongue, where 1/5ths of infection start in saliva glands. 4/5ths in throat ring. Gargling is very efficient.
Treat kids (esp. vaccinated ones, suppresses symptoms while rising viral load, 5x more than unvaccinated on day 10 sine start of an infection!) in the ABSENCE of SYMPTOMS regardless of TESTS.
Just upon close contact to infected.
See Hector Carvallo on this.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hector-Carvallo-2/publication/346034300_COVID_19_Children_should_be_Treated_Even_in_Absence_of_Symptoms_Hirsch_Roberto_R1_Carvallo_Hector_E2/

From BA.4 on we have Antibody Dependant Enhancement of DISEASE, ADE-D.
This will show up starting from Mai.
When will ONS deliver data by vaccination status again? This X-Mas or next?

And PLEASE, debate numbers with epidemiologists (no „experts“ please, but pros!). Do not exaggerate non-stressable low numbers.

We have to proof the 3 deaths are way undercounted. And measure ourselves.
Do a kickstarter project for sensors cheap and DIY that can proof inflammation from the vaccine.

And leave out the commas in calculations that can not be done without an error marge 10x the numbers.

ONS is right the data does not show much.

But the air is tight with fraud and corruption as to how we came to that data and what we did NOT measure.

Eg do kickstarting project to measure say 1000 kids before, after and follow-up on blood parameters D-Dimers, CD-profile (at least nK), Heart parameters, Autoimmune status, inflammation status. Also do a standardised physical exam / questionnaire on the pathophysiology of the spike in action on the same point of time by independant expert opinion qualified physicians.

This normally is called phase-IV of vaccine trials and should be done with 1 Mio. People. It ks a crime it is not done. The one crime that Never falls under statue.
Together with suppression of antiviral (topical) treatment from the slightest symptoms (nasal spray with hypochlorite 800ppm, inhalation 0.6ml for adult lung, adjust kids, eg 5yr 0.2ml to 14 0.5ml, 0.6ml above, adjust for lung fluid volume and confer with pulmologist).
Same possible with PVP-I: if no 0-iodine diet for inhalation (0.6ml 10% pH 6.5 ie buy buffered with NaOH).
Nor PVP intolerance.
Or H2O2.
Or NO generator in hospital: You CAN safe lifes. EARLY bird! (Search BIRD group in GB:) they do this, live saving.

trackback
27 days ago

[…] Shoemaker referirao se na još jednu studiju provedenu u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu koja je koristila podatke Ureda za nacionalnu statistiku od […]