Breaking News

MEP Grills AstraZeneca and Moderna About Vaccines and Vaccine Contracts During EU Covid Committee Meeting

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On Monday, Member of the European Parliament (“MEP”) Cristian Terheș put a barrage of hard-hitting questions to Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and AstraZeneca Vice-President of Europe and Canada, Iskra Reic. 

He asked them to clarify if their companies, themselves, had decoded the DNA sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; if they had tested whether their vaccines stopped the spread of the virus; if any vaccine trial participants died; and, about the indemnity and “secret” contracts they made with governments.

Terhes raised these questions directly with the two during a session of the European Union (“EU”) Special Committee on Covid-19 pandemic.  In April the newly formed Committee elected Kathleen van Brempt as its Chair. The Committee meeting with pharmaceutical companies was held on 5 September and was attended by representatives from Gilead Sciences, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


He posted an 8-minute video clip, included below, of his questions and the company representatives’ answers on his Facebook page with the following comments [Romanian-English using Google translate with some editing]:

The representatives of Moderna and AstraZeneca said in their answers that they produced vaccines upon request by the states/governments that asked them to make the vaccines quickly.  And so, they asked for protection, indemnity, from the payment of compensation for potential damages.

“On the liabilities – as has been done by all the manufacturers – we wanted, sorry, governments wanted a quick approval of a vaccine. And so, for the conditional approval, it was important to give us some guarantees in terms of indemnification, because we cannot have a cake and eat it too. We wanted the vaccine quick without giving time to manufacturers to have long-term studies because of the nature of a pandemic.,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said.

“Liability indemnity clause was discussed and agreed with many governments around the world because everybody wanted to try to see how we can accelerate the development and the delivery on the vaccine. And again, as I mentioned that is something that is considered to be a standard practice in the emergencies and equally that protects and support everybody to move at utmost speed and do their utmost best for on developing or manufacturing [vaccines],” Vice-President of AstraZeneca Iskra Reic said.

Bancel also admitted that the bivalent boosters recently approved in the US have not previously been tested on humans.

Another important statement made by Bancel was that the vaccines were products based on a DNA segment of the virus provided by Chinese authorities at the beginning of 2020 and not the entire DNA.

At the end of the video clip Terhes stated his conclusions:

Moderna continues to avoid answering the question of when will it fully publish the contracts signed with the EU member states and the European Commission.

The manufacturing companies acknowledge that they did not have enough time to test the vaccines, which is why they’ve asked the governments to receive guarantees that they will not be liable, which they received.

Even though the vaccines were not sufficiently tested, the politicians still passed laws to force people to be vaccinated with such products that were produced fast also at their request

“Everything was done on the basis of contracts that [to this day] are not public. In short, we are witnessing the biggest corruption scandal in history, the price of which is also endangering people’s lives,” Terheș wrote in the description accompanying his video post [Romanian-English using Google translate].

EU Special Committee on COVID-19 pandemic, 5 September 2022 (8 mins)

You can watch the full session of the EU Special Committee on Covid-19 pandemic HERE and view the briefing notes or “fact sheets” given to the committee by each of the pharmaceutical companies HERE.

Transcript:

MEP Cristian Terheș: The first set of questions It is for both AstraZeneca and Moderna.

So that the first question is: I would like to I know the date, if it is possible, when you decoded the full DNA sequence of this virus or you solely relied on the sequence provided to you by the Chinese government.

Second question: Have you tested if the vaccines are stopping the spread of the virus or not? Because the data clearly shows the products are not stopping the spread of this virus.

Third question: Have you had people who died during human trials? And if so, what were the illnesses that they died from?

Now, I have certain questions for Moderna, for Mr. Bancel.

You stated here that you relied on the sequence provided to you by the Chinese government when you developed your vaccine.

I have here an answer from EMA, which is showing for every vaccine the kind of tests that were done. So, in the case of Moderna, for example, you provided data showing that you tested these vaccines since 2017, 2018, 2019. So how are you able to test these vaccines back then when we found out about this virus in December of 2019?

Second question: the contracts. You mentioned here that there are some secrets or some confidential information in these contracts that should protect your interests. Now, the question that I addressed to you: what about the interests of us and the interests of the European citizens? Because this is how some of the pages from the contract between Moderna and the European Commission is showing.

So, I’m asking you, do you think this is fair to all of us? To talk about these vaccines, to talk about boosters, to talk about medical products when we don’t know the clauses of these contracts. So, the direct question to you, Mr. Bancel, is when are you going to fully publish the contracts that you have both with the European Commission and with the member states of the European Union?

Another question, the issue of liabilities. You were asked by our colleague here about the liabilities and you avoided to answer this question. So, my question is: why are you pushing the liabilities on the states and on the people who receive these vaccines, and my head, and I say on my head, adverse effects while you get all the profits? Nevertheless, the bivalent boosters.

This is the last question. You just stated here that these boosters were requested by the US government who also approved the boosters without trials on humans. So, I’m asking you, do you think this is fair? Do you think we can go and ask the European citizens to be vaccinated with some medical products that were not properly tested or not at all tested in humans?

Thank you.

Kathleen van Brempt: Mr. Terhes, next time I’ll deduct 40 seconds from your speaking time.

Terhes: Due respect, it’s an important issue and the reason why they are here is to answer questions. And I see that they are all avoiding answering concrete questions from my colleagues.

van Brempt: Yeah, but it’s also respectful for your …

Terhes: Well, they have to be transparent here and so far they haven’t been transparent. Thank you.

van Brempt: I start with Mr. Bancel, and then I come to Mrs. Reic. And please, very specific answer to the specific questions, please. Thank you very much.

Bancel: So, on the first question, as I said before, yes, we use the sequence of a virus published by Chinese government that was online and tested by many scientists in academic labs and government labs that we use for the design of a vaccine.

You make a statement on the poor efficacy of a vaccine against preventing infection.  That actually was not correct in the 2021 timeframe, where it was mostly alpha and delta.  As you recall, the vaccines were holding very well to infection and, of course, hospitalisation and death, which was really important.

What happened was a change with Omicron. As you know, the Omicron virus was a big, big genetic drift from the original sequence coming out of China, which is why the vaccine needed to be retooled. The good news for public health is the vaccine held very well against hospitalisation and which, as we all know, is the number one priority of those vaccines.

On the phase III clinical trial, I’m not aware of any death that happened during the phase III of a clinical trial.

You mentioned the document from EMA which I’m not aware of. But the vaccine that we tested before is what I mentioned to one of your colleagues in my previous set of answers, which is: since 2015, we have been doing clinical trial with our vaccines. This is not, of course, against SARS-CoV-2, because virus did not exist. It was against flu, RSV and also pandemic flu strain. So that is why we were able to get validation of a platform in a clinic.

On the liabilities – as has been done by all the manufacturers – we wanted, sorry, governments wanted a quick approval of a vaccine. And so, for the conditional approval, it was important to give us some guarantees in terms of indemnification, because we cannot have a cake and eat it too. We wanted the vaccine quick without giving time to manufacturers to have long-term studies because of the nature of a pandemic.

And then the last question around testing in human, as I answered in the previous set of questions, the vaccine that has a conditional approval for booster bivalent against Omicron that has been approved in Europe last week, did have clinical study happening for this vaccine. It’s the one in the US that did not. But the one in Europe, there was human testing.

van Brempt: This is right. Thank you.

Reic: So, first, to try to add on Mr. Bancel reply to your question, Mr Terhes, I can say that, as you probably know, our vaccine was developed from the ChAdOx platform, the adenovirus vaccine that already existed as a platform before Covid-19 and the preliminary preclinical work was done in the University of Oxford.

When it comes to liability, I do believe that, I’m sorry to hear that you are not satisfied with the responses but I think we are trying here to be as transparent as possible. Liability indemnity clause was discussed and agreed with many governments around the world because everybody wanted to try to see how we can accelerate the development and the delivery on the vaccine. And again, as I mentioned that is something that is considered to be a standard practice in the emergencies and equally that protects and support everybody to move at utmost speed and do their utmost best for on developing or manufacturing side. Also, the liability indemnity clause is valid only for the certain, those that are contracting, only for the pandemic fix.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

43 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
raj patel
raj patel
23 days ago

Well, what do we expect the pharma companies to say? However, we need to increase the pressure on them and, for sure, cracks will start to appear, at which point this corrupt bunch of people will be throwing each other to the lions. That is a certainty.

777
777
23 days ago

What about the Pfizer’s vaccine trials that they wanted hidden for 75 years.? Do not let them get away so easily. Always lots of talk but still NO action.

Aluna
Aluna
Reply to  777
23 days ago

Well, a first success was that the “Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency” succeeded in court to force Pfizer and the FDA to disclose their documents. They fought, and they won.
Which is exactly the way to go.
Nothing will be for free, people have to fight for their rights and their freedom. But they have a chance for winning.

Petra
Petra
23 days ago

“Another important statement made by Bancel was that the vaccines were products based on a DNA segment of the virus provided by Chinese authorities at the beginning of 2020 and not the entire DNA.”

How can that be when Corona is an RNA virus?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
23 days ago

I should leave this for someone smart but I think DNA and RNA are similar so I guess maybe you could use DNA to produce RNA. See these quotes from sites from smart people:”All of the RNA in a cell is made by DNA transcription… Transcription begins with the opening and unwinding of a small portion of the DNA double helix to expose the bases on each DNA strand. One of the two strands of the DNA double helix then acts as a template for the synthesis of an RNA molecule… The RNA chain produced by transcription—the transcript—is therefore elongated one nucleotide at a time, and it has a nucleotide sequence that is exactly complementary to the strand of DNA used as the template..DNA transcription produces a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one strand of DNA.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26887/Although who knows for sure what’s really in these poisons…

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
23 days ago

Again, why / how does it matter?
What’s the point of this part apart from kicking the virus-hoax can down on the road?

Aluna
Aluna
Reply to  GundelP
23 days ago

True.
What is really interesting is the question WHAT IS REALLY IN THOSE VACCINES.
According to Dr.Nagase, he found no trace of nitrogen or phosphorus in the vaccines, hence no trace of biological material like DNA or MRNA.
Only graphene, oxygen, a bit of sodium and a host of metals, some of which were very exotic (Thulium).
This is not a vaccine, it is an operation system, that is not installed via CD rom, but via injection !!
And it never was about a virus, it is all about converting humans into bio-robots.
Just today, I stumbled upon a video about Ukrainian serial killer Onoprienko. He claimed, that he was controlled by cosmic forces who want to destroy all humans and replace them by bio-robots.That was in 1995.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Aluna
23 days ago

Thanks, I watch it later. As about the rest, La Quinta Columna said the same, no mRNA, they found almost only graphene and nanotech.
In the UK’ laboratory report, what they listed showed also only nanotech elements as far as I can tell.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Aluna
23 days ago

Your video. Voice to skull tech. Not new. Dana Ashlie has a rather good documentary on it.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Petra
23 days ago

No virus ever was isolated, so why does it matter? Besides the patent on ‘viruses’, you can’t patent something that was made by nature. This part, the bio-lab-virus is just a huge, fat HOAX.
They never ever manage to transmit a virus from one person to another, they tried, every time they tried they failed.

This video is LISTING the trials:
https://truthcomestolight.com/the-end-of-germ-theory-documentary-an-easy-to-understand-step-by-step-analysis-of-the-history-of-germ-virus-theory-the-erroneous-science-behind-vaccination-a-close-look-at/

If they can’t make people ‘pass’ a natural ‘virus’ to others how they could do it with a computer made sequence of who-knows-what?

Aluna
Aluna
Reply to  GundelP
23 days ago

Er …. not so sure about this.
I had two ex-boyfriends who passed herpes to me.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Aluna
23 days ago

Watch it if you have time and you’ll understand how it was possible.
https://truthcomestolight.com/the-end-of-germ-theory-documentary-an-easy-to-understand-step-by-step-analysis-of-the-history-of-germ-virus-theory-the-erroneous-science-behind-vaccination-a-close-look-at/

Also this – they don’t want to talk about the Montaigner experiment, so badly not that the Daily Mail will even filter out any comment with this title (below, the video) and Montaigner recently died, ok, he was old enough but the timing…

This is an important info on ‘infections’

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Aluna
22 days ago

Great! You find a microbiologist/virologist/endocrinologist etc. and I will go you thirds in the 100,000 euros offered by Dr. Stephan Lanka. All we need to do is prove the existence of the measles virus. P.S. One doctor tried and won, only to be overturned in the highest court in Germany. Germ theory is only a THEORY. NEVER proven by either Koch’s postulates, or River’s logical sequence of establishing the existence of a pathological virus. Bottom line. Viruses are either exosomes or simply cell debris from cytopathic additives during the “isolation” process. We have been hoodwinked by a multi-trillion dollar industry. Please research. Not saying there are no forms of transmission, saying that Rosenau and other doctors throughout the last century or so were UNABLE to establish the form of transmission in spite of many, many different scientific attempts.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  GundelP
22 days ago

Absolutely agree with you. See my comments in this thread!

Patel
Patel
23 days ago

More importantly, the question that needs to be answered is why did the governments ban the use of HCQ and Ivermectin for early treatment, which would have made the use of the experimental jabs unnecessary in the first place? Why did the UK government tell people to stay at home until they were sick enough to be admitted to hospital instead of them getting early treatment with safe, cheap, and effective medication? Where did the the governments and their advisors get these instructions from, ultimately?

julal
julal
Reply to  Patel
23 days ago

with you 100% Patel

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Patel
23 days ago

Because it is a planned, deliberate culling of the population, you can’t really expect them to save you when they work hard on killing you?

By the way, I still don’t know how either the Ivermectin or the HCQ could help on the symptoms of acute radiation (aka. Covid), unless it works as antibiotics usually do.

Anyone? What’s the mechanism, how they work exactly in the body, doing what?

Merv
Merv
Reply to  GundelP
22 days ago

To the best of my limited knowledge, HCQ is an anti malarial and IVM is anti parasitic. Not sure of the action of ither.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Merv
22 days ago

edit- either not ither.

Daisy
Daisy
23 days ago

Give Tehres a medal for pursuing against immense opposition and obfuscation by the corrupt and criminal big Pharma and getting very little support from the Chairman of the COVID committee is seems. For such an important issue how ridiculous to penalise him for a few extra minutes ! It just demonstrates how seriously they are not taking it. Expose published another article concerning Moderna showing that they had patented SARS-COV-2 and made a COVID vaccine long before there was a Plandemic…if this is the case Bancel was lying.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Daisy
23 days ago

What’s new? They ordered covid-19 tests (many countries) from the world bank in 2017, the proof was all over the net 1-2 years ago. How they could calibrate the tests?
Keep the focus on radiation because that’s you should be very afraid of.

https://www.brighteon.com/159123f1-6b4f-40c2-9b40-b884e2e4c0c3

Merv
Merv
Reply to  GundelP
22 days ago

Symptoms of RF exposure and the ‘flu are identical. Agree. Also, one theory is that mm waves of 60Ghz, which is the resonant frequency of O2, oscillate the O2 molecule making it unable to be picked up by haemoglobin in our blood. Low O2 levels source?

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
23 days ago

The date that the covid virus was known about was long before the pandemic tells me all I need to know now. Track it back to US biolabs in the Ukraine and you start to get an idea of a rogue MIC biological weapn being developed.

Released in China might just be a red herring to who was behind all this.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Mark Deacon
23 days ago

There is no virus to track back, it is radiation, always was and no one talks about it because their victory depends on it, that is their weak point, the 5G and the vax working together. The virus legend was many birds with one stone.
It started it Wuhan and was exclusively deadly there (but other parts of China), where they deployed 10 000 new antennas for 5G. While playing pandemic, blaming a novel (bio lab or natural doesn’t matter) virus they could make the base for the real bio-weapon, the vax and they could disguise the harm of 5G and elevated radiation blaming it on a virus.

https://www.brighteon.com/936df8eb-df02-4cc4-bd83-6b14e9cbaa27

This MEP is a bit late, 1.5 years at least during that time many died, what did he do, sleeping till now?

Daisy
Daisy
Reply to  GundelP
22 days ago

Tehres has not been a silent voice…he along with a few colleagues formed a small committee to challenge the vaccine contracts. After a long time they managed to get the contracts and found them to be 90% redacted so nobody can read anything as he mentioned in the above questions put to Moderna and AZ. It is scandalous and van der Layen is ultimately responsible to rectify it….but she will not at least until hell freezes over.

PureBlood1778
PureBlood1778
23 days ago

There Are Now 365 Studies that Prove the Efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in Treating COVID-19. Any hospital administrator who mandated the shots to employees to comply with the government mandate for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and who refused to allow alternative treatments to be tried, doctors who pushed their patients to take the EUA drug without giving fully informed consent, anyone who forcefully administered the shot, the AMA, AAP, Boards of Health, CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, scientists who participated in the development, Big Pharma (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, Astra Zeneca, et. al.), anyone who pushed the sick into nursing homes resulting in deaths, all must be arrested, prosecuted, tried and if found guilty sentenced to prolonged imprisonment and fines or death for intentional homicide. Get your ivermectin before it is too late! https://ivmpharmacy.com

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  PureBlood1778
23 days ago

I still wish to understand how it works. Two reasons: First is that I lost trust, I wouldn’t like to eat any of your pills, any! Who knows what is in them nowadays. Second is that I still don’t know how it works, the effect on the body, what does it do exactly? It is an anti-parasitic drug, what it does to change the effect of the radiation (covid)?

He ask very valid questions about Ivermectin and Steve Falconer made grate documentary like little videos in past, in fact his germ-theory debunking is better than Kaufman’s Terrain.

https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Ivermectin-Friend-or-Foe-Spacebusters:9

trackback
22 days ago

[…] – MEP Grills AstraZeneca and Moderna About Vaccines and Vaccine Contracts During EU Covid Committee Me… […]

Merv
Merv
22 days ago

These reps for big pharma are damage control specialists. Sequence of DNA/RNA? Not the whole sequence. Scam to perpetuate, cover up the lies. Multi trilllion dollar industry based on the lie of a “virus”, never proven by either Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates to exist.

trackback
22 days ago

[…] Read More: MEP Grills AstraZeneca and Moderna About Vaccines […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] MEP Grills AstraZeneca and Moderna About Vaccines and Vaccine Contracts During EU Covid Committee Me… […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] them for any adverse events suffered by people as a result of the so-called “vaccines.”  As we’ve previously written, this has been challenged by the likes of Member of the European Parliament (“MEP”) Cristian […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] per eventuali eventi avversi subiti dalle persone a causa dei cosiddetti “vaccini”. Come abbiamo già scrittoquesto è stato contestato da membri del calibro di Cristian Terhes, membro del Parlamento europeo […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] them for any adverse events suffered by people as a result of the so-called “vaccines.”  As we’ve previously written, this has been challenged by the likes of Member of the European Parliament (“MEP”) Cristian […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] them for any adverse events suffered by people as a result of the so-called “vaccines.”  As we’ve previously written, this has been challenged by the likes of Member of the European Parliament (“MEP”) Cristian […]

trackback
21 days ago

[…] שלילי שסבלו מאנשים כתוצאה ממה שמכונה "חיסונים". כפי שכתבנו בעבר, זה אותגר על ידי חבר הפרלמנט האירופי, כריסטיאן טרהס, […]