Breaking News

Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-Machines

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

During an interview with Australian podcaster Maria Zeee, Dr. David Nixon revealed a video of nanotechnology in Pfizer’s Covid injections assembling.  They are not self-assembling, Dr. Nixon explained, but rather they are being assembled by nanorobots or micro-machines.  The work of these robots is happening at such a slow pace that the work they’re doing isn’t detected unless the video is played at about 100x real-time speed.  To demonstrate Dr. Nixon condensed his 3-hour video into about a minute.

Dr. David Nixon is a general practitioner based in Brisbane, Australia, with a special interest in diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the management of long-term conditions.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


In a previous podcast with Maria Zeee, Dr. Nixon revealed his findings of nanotechnology inside the Covid injections. He also discussed how protecting the vials inside a Faraday bag stopped the structures from forming.  A Faraday bag is used to block out electromagnetic radiation; e.g., signals sent between cell phones.  You can read more HERE and watch this earlier podcast HERE.

In his latest revelations, Dr. Nixon played a video he had taken of the contents of a vial of Pfizer’s Covid “vaccine.” He placed approximately four drops of Pfizer “vaccine” on a glass slide, placed it under a microscope at 200x magnification and filmed the slide for three hours. 

In real-time, it appears nothing is happening. “But look what happens when I speed this up,” Dr. Nixon said, “it’s apparent we’re dealing with something completely different from self-assembly – this is nano construction … it’s not assembling itself, it’s essentially, I guess, micro construction.

Dr. Nixon points to two micro-machines in the video that are working on building the same nanostructure “square” and commented that “it’s being put together by, essentially, micromachinery which is coordinated.  You can’t see anything in real-time, nothing seems to be happening. It’s only when you speed it up [you can see it]. I can’t even begin to think of technology that works at those sorts of speeds … Not only is this happening very slowly but it’s also happening in a coordinated fashion.”

It takes a little while to get your eye in but once know what to look for the micro-machines can clearly be seen at work in Dr Nixon’s video.  To help our readers get their eye in we have taken a screenshot at about timestamp 10 mins and circled in red the two robotic arms or micro-machines pointed out by Dr. Nixon that are assembling the nanostructures.  Once you get your eye in you can see what seems to be a third micro-machine at work on the right-hand side of the nanostructure “square.”

You can watch Dr. Nixon’s demonstration of micromachinery on Rumble by clicking on the image below.

Maria Zeee: Robotic Arms Assembling Via Nanotech Inside COVID-19 “Vaccines” – Filmed in Real Time – Dr. Nixon,
25 October 2022 (20 mins)
Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

4 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

138 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pat
Pat
1 month ago

I don’t THINK so! This man is an MD, with apparently no background in the area of crystallography or electronics. There are no robotic arms! What you see is crystals forming, which happens under ordinary/natural conditions that are good for the formation of crystals. It may well be that for these to form under these circumstances will be stimulated by RF, or may require it. Hence, the Faraday bag. But crystals by themselves are NOT machines. They won’t do anything without a circuit. There is no circuit here. Obviously, the crystals are foreign and toxic matter. Their hardness and shape are going to damage tissue. But we will look like fools if we claim that this is some kind of machine forming. If you want to know why I can assert this, suffice it to say I have been married for 52 years to one of the top experts in computer hardware and software, and electronics. As a radio ham, he designed and built his own ham television station, including an NTSC standard color sync generator. And he has taught me much. I also have an interest in mineralogy that goes back decades, and a background in several sciences.

Finally it should be noted that the crystals are irregular in shape, so not good for much of anything except damaging tissue.

Merv
Merv
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

I have never seen crystals do anything like this. Measurement of angles to the basal angle will render your hypotheses without fact. And the good doctor mentioned viewing many different types of crystal formation under similar conditions. Crystal growth is always in defined angles, never changing angles!
I wouldn’t throw the bathwater out just yet, try and ascertain if there is indeed a baby in there first.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

Crystals indeed do tend to have specific angles, but they can be malformed, and these ARE malformed. And no, these are not changing angles. These are nothing more complex than malformed crystals. This is not to say that they’re not dangerous. They certainly are. But they are not devices that can be used to control people, and it isn’t necessary for them to be, to accomplish their purpose. All they need to be is sufficiently damaging to kill someone, and if these are formed when bathed in 5G, that’s all that is needed. I think the jury is still out on that, however.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

The devices (computer particles) were visibly recognizable, which are able to control people were identified, even that was shown how they form a ‘computer’, how they are computer parts. You can find that on many places, even you can find the studies collected about how they should / assumed to work.
And this info came from not only one source but at least two or more, La Quinta Columna, That Matt with Stew Peters, and Mik Anderson (fake name to protect the person as one researched from their team already suddenly had died to heart attack just shortly after he discovered that waiting and temperature is the key to see something in the vaxxes).

Here he shows you the photos taken about them in the vax and the photos in the studies connected – identical parts. They are not only sharp crystals. Besides sharp crystals won’t give you MAC address (dynamic by the way).

https://www.brighteon.com/9994356b-4e3e-4f1d-9083-4eacfc7bcbc3

Steve
Steve
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

An open mind is required, what you understood to be fact years ago, is now as different as incandescent bulbs to LED’s or valves with heaters and cathodes etc to micro electronics.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Steve
1 month ago

Understood. But it is necessary for you to understand that modern day technology is MORE complex in structure than the old stuff. My knowledge spans these decades. These are NOT COMPLEX ENOUGH to be any kind of circuit.

I have an open mind, but not so open my brains fall out! Let’s not make more elaborate claims than are necessary. It is a fact that it is SUFFICIENT for these to be poorly formed crystals of a toxic substance that also physically damages tissue. Leave it at that. We don’t need for them to control people through these structures and 5G. Most people are already being controlled by their cell phones and advertising. All you need to remember is the millions upon millions who willingly got the shots or failed to stand up to tyranny. I am not aware of anyone that wants to exterminate the race. They just want to reduce the numbers drastically so they have slaves.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

I too am a strong scientific thinker Pat but definitely in the let’s see if there is a baby first camp. Remembering how sceptical many were last year, when unnatural structures were first discovered in blood specimens of the vaccinated.

Not comforted by you saying “I am not aware of anyone that wants to exterminate the race. They just want to reduce the numbers drastically so they have slaves.” Genocide is evil and the filth want mutants, not human beings for slaves.

They’re far from omnipotent, just want us to think they are. It’s obvious the effectiveness of their methods are limited, hence why they’re desperate we’re vaxxed to the eyeballs constantly, poison our food, air etc. We are designed most wonderfully, over time our bodies will restore natural homeostasis, so they need to keep poisoning us.

What’s happening is absolutely horrific but the fat lady isn’t singing yet.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Please make no mistake. I am not challenging most of the claims. My challenge is limited to the claim that some kind of devices or machines are assembling themselves or being assembled by bots while within the human body.

As for what they want, they want total control, and will do whatever they have to and are capable of doing, to bring that about. No argument there, but it is not germane to the thing I am challenging, which is that singular claim. And no, the fat lady ain’t sung yet.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Hugs, i hear you Pat, think you and i would love a free, open minded discussion.

You’re not actually trying to claim superior knowledge, just expressing what you think from the information you’ve acquired. Ditto me, i’m old and my core thoughts have held strong for many years but will happily change them if they aren’t logical anymore.

Seems to me you’re similar.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Taken this test within about the last half hour Pat, think the results will interest you as they’re pretty much a constant for me, apart from slight modifications:

https://personalitymax.com/report/?pt=95-1-84-1&mi=97-93-80-90-83-73-83-100&ls=59-51-82&bh=38&name_key=fe75014365

And yes, as a born left hander who taught myself to be ambidextrous, i’m always 62/63% left brained. Recommend you take the test, they near constantly change the questions and don’t seem to have an agenda.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

And sadly, i express one of my most significant results wrong over 90% of the time, i’m always 62/63% right brained.

Sorry for being so sloppy.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Thanks, Demeter. I’m not inclined to worry about the test you took, nor do I think handedness has much to do with facts and logic. I am about 80% ambidexttrous myself, having early on started to study piano, which requires similar dexterity in both hands. I habitually do some things with my right hand, and some with my left, and do poorly if I reverse, though it is possible for me to do so.

If you are reading all of this stuff, you see that I give detailed answers in defense of my single claim. So far, none of the links I have been given refutes that claim. Some are downright irrelevant, and others are relevant to the general topic, but do not address my specific point. I have demonstrated that the claim that circuits self-assemble in the body is not currently happening, nor do they yet have the technology to design a mechanism to do this. If self-assembly occurs, it is under laboratory conditions which are very different from the conditions in the body.

For awhile, I will be patient and take the time to refute all this stuff, but I won’t waste my life on it. Eventually I am just going to tell them they have made up their minds and refuse to be confused by the facts. I can be patient, but I won’t mince words.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Hope you get to see this reply Missy Pat, had a lovely couple of days which really got me involved.

Agree your ideas are logical but mainstream truth no longer exists, smart people have to figure out what’s most likely to be true. As in the discoveries of ’21, which then proved to be true, i think interesting but let’s see.

Personally think the likelihood of the new discoveries being true is at least 60% likely, the filth are that evil.

That detailed personality test i posted my personal, near constant results to, is free and the best around. Didn’t tell me anything new but so glad you understand the rubbish, left/right brained false dichotomy. Worthless getting led off on that path to me currently, suspect you might understand why i say that.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Thanks, Demeter! I try to make sure everything I say is fact. The other side lies. We must never stoop to that. We need to be perceived as the side that always tells the truth. This means being technically savvy enough to reject false conclusions, even those made in good faith. And I have no doubt of the good faith of the people who think there are little machines in the blood of jab victims.

While I can go to a counselor and get a personality test that lends some insight, I don’t tend to have a very high opinion of personality tests online, especially since many of them are just silly, and meant to entertain. How do you tell the difference? I don’t bother.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Bless your heart me darling =)

Totally agree with so much of what you’re saying apart from my personal experience of the personality test. It’s so obvious the likes of Leonardo da Vinci and myself are virtual twins, my daughter and niece are very strong ENTP/Renaissance types too. They too are born left handers both active lefties, my daughter is as strong a natural chess player as me. We’re at least FM level but can take anyone down if we don’t get sloppy/lose the plot.

You are a darling and most of these tests are silly, which is why i posted info for a good one. Very possible it’s to help the filth know what they’re dealing with, don’t give personal info and copy and paste your results if you want to save them.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

LOL I have had one person to whom I am darling: my husband. 🙂 Perhaps your characterization of me is cultural?

I’m just not into psychology in general, which is the source of most such tests. And if I take a test and they want my email address to send results, and don’t just display them, I just abandon the situation.

I am fundamentally right-handed, but about 80% ambidextrous, through training. I started studying piano at the age of 3. Piano is an instrument that requires and builds ambidexterity. I do some things better with my right hand, some better with my left. Being able to use two hands at once comes in might handy.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Should be “mighty” handy.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Heya sweetheart, you don’t need to give an addy, or any info to get the detailed results, just copy and paste. Look at my results, i only offered a and a. Go for the test Missy, it’s a really detailed one, think it’ll interest you. And the way i say things is probably cultural, born in the UK but not of British extraction.

True about DARPA, makes me question if i have the organisation right. Know for sure it was an evil, heavy duty US team that helped develop Linux and TOR.

Personally love Linux, used several different different distros since the early 00’s. Am techy and build my own rigs, first fell in love with computers during a Uni summer job, back in the late ’70s. When i say i’m old, it’s truth. Hmm, surprised your art software is slower, dunno if i can help but post what you use if you want and i’ll check out if there are useful modifications, or alternatives.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

OK, just so you know, in MY culture, “sweetheart” is a term of endearment between SPOUSES and between PARENTS AND CHILDREN ONLY. The use of it toward anyone else can be derogatory.

I don’t know offhand who developed Linux. I’d have to check that out.

I assemble my own PCs from motherboard, memory units, hard drives, DVD drives, mouse, monitor, etc. etc. The slowness of my response on the internet is not due to software, but to the fact I do not have fiber optics. I only have copper and DSL. And the fact I load too much into my browser so I completely fill RAM and it has to swap out to hard disk all the time so I can switch between tabs, etc.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Been a Linux user for a long time, am seriously techy knowing i can’t make my system perfect but have a chance of making my system hard to penetrate.

Linux was designed using Darpa, i never have thought it was safe, just better. Hope my personal adaptations are worthwhile.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

DARPA is said to be intimately involved in creating bioweapons. I wouldn’t like to think so, but that’s what I have read. I prefer Linux for security, to Windows. But the learning curve seems a bit steep, and some of the art software I use won’t run under it, or is very slow. Takes too long to render the art as it is.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

This is the best definition of my personality type, i’ve seen Pat: https://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/09/prweb14700173.htm

GunDelete
GunDelete
Reply to  Demeter
1 month ago

Just for poisonings they can put graphene oxide anywhere (and they do) but what would be the point to push a vax? Forming nanotech was recorded on video, clearly nanotech, Pat later tried to argue that not in the blood. What woukd be the point to put nanotech into the vaxxes which forms computer parts in the vax on room / body temperature but not in you?

Another and short Maria Zeee interview for those who are bored with the long arguing of the details.

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=141328

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

What you said I said is not what I said at all. I said that what you saw on the video was NOT nanotech forming CIRCUITS. I said that the BLOOD on the slide showed no CIRCUITS forming. The square objects are crystals. From my reading in the literature, nanotech can involve something as simple as a graphene tube, but it’s just a tube. Wires can be layered crosshatched to form a transistor, which is a component or device, not a circuit. I am still going through some of the links I have been given; finally some real meat. It is not at all clear that they have been able to achieve formation of anything resembling even components, let alone circuits in any place other than a laboratory in a special medium. One report I am reading dates from 2019. The shots came out in late 2020. There is evidence that Moderna had developed its “vaccine” before Covid was even released at the end of 2019. There was no time for them to develop nanotech processes that work in the human body. What is the point to push a vax? Simple. It persuades people that it is to their benefit to get shot up with something containing graphene, or graphene oxide, or other graphene compound.

The aim of the shots is to KILL. They want to make slaves of the survivors. But the survivors aren’t the people getting the shots. Trying to control them with 5G would be useless.

Now about your video. I checked out the background of the guest, Dr. Robert O. Young. He is not an MD. He DOES have a PhD and a DSc, so he is entitled to be called “doctor” although places like Quackwatch claim he’s a “doctor” (in quotes as if he’s not a real doctor). Keep in mind that MDs are technicians. To get an MD, no original research is necessary. To get a PhD, a person must do research leading to the writing of a dissertation, which is then defended before a panel of professors in the granting university. Dr. Young is knowledgeable in alternate healing, and specialized in the study of blood coagulation. And he has paid his dues, having been imprisoned for bucking the Establishment. That said, apparently he claimed (if the report is accurate) that blood cells turn into bacteria and back again. That’s nonsense. But for the most part, he IS an expert, but in the BIOLOGICAL sciences (including nutrition). He has NO formal expertise in electronics or electrical engineering.

What about the claims in the video? He explains graphene and graphene compounds as being susceptible to activation by 5G. Fine. But he starts off with the statement that this turns the body into a cell tower. Thereby he displays profound ignorance. A cell tower TRANSMITS. The damage of which he speaks is caused by the body RECEIVING energy at a certain frequency from 5G. Polar opposites.

I can accept the idea that 5G interacts with graphene and graphene compounds in the body to do severe damage. But I should point out that NOTHING Dr. Young says has ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with the issue of whether or not there are CIRCUITS in the body as a result of the Covid shots. I rest my case.

Demeter
Demeter
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

Absolutely see what you’re seeing GD, just think they want us to believe they’re omnipotent when they’re far from it.

All they truly can do is make us fear so much, we comply with their evil. Personally think they create frequencies, they can’t create real stuff, to trap us into believing their evil ideas.

Truly could go off on one trying to explain what i think but too complex to explain by text.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Try this, he even shows you the element of this stuff from the smallest (less complex to more and more complex).

Circuit? Why not? You are ‘full with circuits’ that’s how your body works – they are just re-wiring that including your brain.

The MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications
https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Again, I will have to view the video to comment on it, which I do not have time to do at the moment. Yes, we have “circuits” in the body, but they are NOT MADE OF graphene or graphene oxide and other toxic materials. The technology is completely different. The fact that we have this structure within our body does not make it possible for graphene circuits to assemble themselves inside the body. In fact, the structure and design of our bodies PRECLUDES this kind of manufacture. I will present links that describe how micro-electronics are manufactured. It is an extremely complex process, and requires environments that do not faintly resemble anything inside the body. In fact, even the smallest contamination of the environment in which these are manufactured, by any substance in the body or emitted from it, will prevent these devices from being successfully manufactured. These devices are even less likely to assemble themselves than a watch is; they are orders of magnitude more complex.

Bertibear
Bertibear
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

People have been mind controlled for years without the hydrogels.There are reasons to believe that the very structure of cellular water is important along with electrical signals which is what transmits sickness, not virus particles.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Bertibear
1 month ago

Agree on mind control. I don’t know why the structure of cellular water is an issue. I have some some reading on structured water for drinking, and I’m not convinced it is important to drink it. I don’t necessarily agree electrical signals have anything to do with illnesses alleged to be caused by viruses. Remember, people caught illnesses allegedly caused by viruses long before mankind generated electrical signals of any kind. If you said viruses cause damage through the generation of electrical signals, that’s a theory I could investigate and perhaps accept. But it would appear viruses are real. Are they methods for the body to detoxify? Maybe so, but if detoxification occurs too fast, it can cause symptoms or even kill. Is that what is happening? For me, the jury is still out. But I think viruses are real. The question is the mechanism by which they produce symptoms of illness. And I’m more into the terrain theory, but don’t totally discount the germ theory. There IS something out there that causes disease, but if your body is healthy and your immune system good, it won’t matter. I don’t get contagious and infectious diseases. I haven’t had a problem with that for a half century, in fact ever since I stopped receiving vaccines 60 years ago. If the family passed around a cold, I was always last to get it. It required extreme exposure. And it was always mild. Since everyone left home, we haven’t had any incidences of such illness at all.

Adam
Adam
Reply to  Bertibear
1 month ago

You are truly cooked. ‘Open mind’, more like completely cooked.

John
John
Reply to  Steve
1 month ago

An open mind is not the same as a gullible mind.

creamwalls
creamwalls
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

For your information: A scientist from Portsmouth in the UK and now living in New Zealand has researched these constructions and found that they are not natural crystal formations.
 
Also, independent and controlled researches have also proven that “inoculated” people are creating MAC addresses. People that had been “vaccinated” were isolated in remote areas away from all digital and electronic devices. Then when the researchers approached them with a Bluetooth enabled device, a MAC address would appear on it. These MAC addresses are unique to each individual and consistently reappeared when each individual was retested.  
 
This is even being found in graveyards where people that have died soon after “vaccination” have been buried. The same MAC address will consistently show on different devices when the same grave is approached.
 
Where your claims about them being natural crystal formations really holds no water are the very unnatural fibrous “blood clots” being found by embalmers in the veins and arteries of deceased “vaccinated” people. Embalmers have pulled out and shown 3-foot-long never before seen elasticated clots from the veins of people that died after being “vaccinated”.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  creamwalls
1 month ago

Allow me please this:
everyone is encouraged to test the MAC phenomenon but they tried to HIDE it, it means that new Android phones and devices won’t show them, true for IPhone, too.

In a case of an Android you need to install an additional application called Bluetooth Scanner or you can use an old Android but even those can show them differently, eg. Android 6 mobile list them but just as ‘Misc’ connections (like 50 Misc out of nowhere), Android tablet (a chinese type) list them properly with MAC addresses which you can check one by one on a site designed to identify MACs.

In the video I linked above (the MAC phenomenon one), he will tell you other methods how to adjust your phone’ options to make these MACs visible.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  creamwalls
1 month ago

Sorry, I don’t buy the MAC address bit. In order for there to be MAC addresses in the body, each person would have to be injected from a personal vial which contains ONE particle with the MAC address already embedded in it. You cite no source. And it is not clear that the source you claim even has the expertise to make that claim.

I want to clarify the bit about “natural crystal formation”. Obviously, it is not natural or normal for these to form in the body. The substances needed are not even naturally present. What I am arguing is that these are structures that form in the body as a consequence of injecting an unnatural toxic substance, but they assemble into a crystal-like mass with none of the structure needed to constitute a machine, device, or electronic circuit of any kind.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

“MAC addresses”
this phenomenon can be verified by any-one using either an older ‘android’ phone or a newer ‘phone with the BlueTooth/LE scanner app’ …..
BTW: how can a ‘MAC address’ be generated without the presence of complex, electronic-type circuitry….

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

You won’t find circuits forming in the body that will generate MAC addresses. If there are any in the body, they were injected already formed. But since it appears that they were shooting multiple people out of the same vial, it seems unlikely, because MAC addresses are supposed to be unique.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

you won’t find circuits forming in the body that will generate MAC addresses
again:
you are pre-supposing that current technology is all there is…..
this is stuff that has been developed unbeknownest to the general public…
the fact is:
MAC addresses are being generated….
from that: the presence of complex circuitry can be deduced ;
NO other logical explanation can be reached…..

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

Here you are, chiding me for not thinking like you do, for not considering other opinions, and yet you assert no other logical explanation can be reached. How about following your own advice? Double standard anyone?

WHO says MAC addresses are BEING generated? And what makes you think you can deduce this from what appears to be hearsay?

I have no more patience for your attitude and lack of knowledge/reason than I do for the shots themselves and what they do to people in the name of helping them.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Maybe you yourself have a problem to look at yourself. You’re not a vaccine manufacturer, are you? So how do you know what’s real and what’s not? They know. There is too much logic detached from reality in your statements. You are actually creating a separate reality without accepting the foundation on which you exist. Again, you are not fully knowledgeable, you are not a vaccine manufacturer.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

Ad hominem attack. A logical fallacy, used when a person doesn’t have a valid argument. All I have to know about THIS issue is the ability to see the videos and evaluate what I am seeing, with the background I have. There are no circuits and no bots assembling things in any video. And I also can rely on the information that is out there. The mechanism for causing a circuit to self-assemble within living tissue simply does not exist at this time. All self-assembly devices require a particular laboratory environment which is very different from the interiors of living flesh. I have to ask again. Who or what are you protecting? Why are you so dogmatic about this, attacking me and my knowledge instead of offering real evidence?

You and two others have made downright pitiful showings in opposition to the simple statement I made, and you are by far the LEAST able to support your viewpoint.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

5G gives it them, sorry to say this but how long you will carry on arguing WITHOUT checking the info provided by me and others? It’s pointless. For every question of yours the answer is in Delgado’ summaries and also in Mik Anderson’ summary – the link to the “MAC phenomenon.

What about reading first just as we did for months, searching, you are in a privileged situation, you don’t have to waste your time as we did it – for you, too.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You’d have to ask the people who created these vaccines. You are not them, it is inadequate and incomplete to translate the real piece of information you have.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

Why would I ask the shot manufacturers or developers? They lie. What is your PROBLEM? You have a bee in your bonnet and have your panties in a wad. Why? What or who are you protecting?

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

A DYNAMIC MAC address… it changes, it looks one thing which doesn’t change, the first character within a ‘group’, someone wrote here that MACs starting with 4 or 5 or 6 means P..zer, MACs starting with 7 means Mod..na, 1-3 Jans.. – I don’t know this part is true or not but my neighbors’ (I ‘see’ across the wall and radiating us, too, so nice…) always the same, 3 starts with ‘P..zer’, one with ‘Mod..na’ – always. The full number/characters tend to change rather often

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Joking? Many of us tested, regularly. Even the author of the article tested it herself.
I have several videos and photos, allow me to show. Shame that here only one photo can be uploaded to one comment.
I made it on a flight back to the UK full with UK holidaymakers. Try to INDENTIFY these MACs, check!!

backtoUK.jpg
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I can upload many more…
This one I made on a petrol station (UK). I also have several from abroad.

petrols0212.jpg
Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

You are still jumping to conclusions, which is your problem in the first place: Jumping to conclusions that a device is the same as a circuit. You jumped to the conclusion that I didn’t read your links. I did. I watched at least part of your recommended videos. I do not have the hearing, time, or patience to watch the whole thing in one sitting. This conversation has eaten up a good part of my day already.

The fact is, in order to change a MAC number, you need some kind of circuit. Unless you can demonstrate there is a circuit, no MAC numbers are being changed. And why would they bother with that, when it is so much easier just to poison people with pure graphene or graphene oxide? You don’t need a device or a circuit to do that. What happens at a petrol station has no bearing on what happens in the human body. It seems likely to me that the sources of MAC numbers in your photo is something external, like a cell phone, a certificate showing inoculation, or something of like ilk.

It would appear to me, and no disparagement intended, that you lack the technical background to sift through the lies to find the truth in this particular area. I don’t see the point in continuing a discussion with you, because you have your mind made up. You don’t want to be confused by the facts. I really don’t have the time to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed person. Be comfortable in your delusions, and I sincerely hope they rest lightly on you. I have no desire to see, nor do I take comfort in seeing, anyone hurt by these death shots or their stupidity in submitting to them.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You are wrong a lot in what you write. How do you know, for example, that the processor does only one thing or two? Maybe it has other functions. You know as much as you are told. You don’t make microprocessors. Just like you don’t make vaccines. You make your statements from the top. Putting the people below. And you are wrong. If you are wrong, you would have to take a look at yourself, be uncomfortable with not knowing everything.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

I do not buy that you cover all the knowledge that is around. You respectfully know as much as you could learn, but you don’t have all the knowledge. You’re not the people who made these vaccines, are you? You’re not working for them, are you? So you don’t have access to other types of technology. Just because you don’t know ballet doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Just because you can’t explain some conspiracies, doesn’t mean they don’t exist. We live in a world where manipulation is about editing reality. You give people a piece of information, and then these people become an oracle of what is possible and what is not.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

I never claimed to know everything. I DO know about this. I am saying there is no CIRCUIT in the blood after the shots. There are lots of other nasty things, but not a circuit. Without a circuit, there is no processor. Since there is no circuit, it does nothing that necessitates a processor.

You are being just about as dogmatic as anyone can be. What makes you an authority?

I am adamantly opposed to the shots. They are not vaccines.

Sti
Sti
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Stay in denial then, Pat.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Sti
1 month ago

Denial of WHAT? What are you accusing me of being in denial of? I agree that these shots are death shots, and that they do a lot of harm, which is from multiple causes with multiple consequences. I am simply denying the incorrect information regarding one claim that wll make us look like fools. Don’t kid yourselves. People who are against us plant these incorrect ideas that look plausible on the surface for the purpose of discrediting us. We need to be discerning enough to reject what is clearly false to an expert in the field, and concentrate on the things they are trying to distract us from pursuing or informing people of.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Denial of WHAT?”
yr laboring under-the-delusion that the technology currently known to the public or that is publicly accessible is all the technology that exists…
that is an UNPROVEN and UNSUBSTATIATED pre-supposition…

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

That is a possibility, but given how deeply I dig, and how I put together what I know with reason and logic, I don’t think so. If this technology existed, they’d be using it in cell phones. They’re not.

It is still under development.

What they do have is nanoparticles that are being used for such applications as coating mRNA so it doesn’t degrade as mRNA normally would. These same practices are used in time-release medication and supplements. This has nothing to do with circuits.

It should also be noted that people have access to the blood of those who have gotten the shots. Regardless of any other consideration, they haven’t found any circuitry. They’re misinterpreting what they are seeing, and people are buying it. They look like fools.

They may be able to hide the technological developments themselves. They cannot hide people’s blood.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

how deeply I dig

more likely than not: you could well be ‘digging’ in the wrong place(s) …..
another problem is that we, generally, only have
ⁿᵈ or ʳᵈ -hand accounts of the ‘activities’ in places like ‘Area 51’ ……
obviously: what they are doing in such places will NEVER be published in publicly accessible forums such as, for instance, peer-reviewed scientific journals…
@ best: we have to ‘read-between-the-lines’ , as it were….

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

Sorry, I don’t base my views on rumors and conspiracy theories. All I have seen by way of photos are clearly from WWII sources. Until I see some concrete evidence, I will simply work on the problems in front of me. I have plenty to keep me busy.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

No people don’t look like fools. And it doesn’t matter what other people think of us. They can laugh at what they want and we can believe what we want.
You’re not a vaccine manufacturer, are you?
You don’t have all the knowledge. You know as much as you have access to knowledge. This is information that someone else has edited for you.
If you were so deep, logical, and rational, you would know and remember that we live on planet Earth, wouldn’t you? You would remember who we are. And who we are in. And that there are different factions of people, beings who want to own us like cattle. In this world we live in, these nano, pico, and fem technology things are real. In a world where “gods” want to own us, they hate humanity, they are jealous of our emotions. Therefore, they want to spoil our race. And they have a technology to do it. To try.
How is it possible?
And do you love all the people you know? You live in harmony with each of your neighbors. You’ve never hurt anyone? Please … If you can, so can the others.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

I see absolutely no reason to respond to the many IRRELEVANT ad hominem attacks in your messages. And nobody edited my messages. They look the same as what I wrote.

I am trying to get powerful people to STOP KILLING the people I love. I don’t want the help of any FOOLS. And if people promote a false claim about what is in the shots, they ARE fools. Nobody will take them seriously, least of all the people who have the power to stop the killing.

Yes, they have technology to kill us. They ARE killing people. But circuits in the blood is not one of the technologies they are using. (Nor do they NEED that to accomplish their goal.) The ability to do this with self-assembling devices within living tissue does not yet exist. The literature makes it quite plain that they HOPE to develop this in the future. I am talking about reports that were published within the last year.

What is your PROBLEM?

Table salt
Table salt
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

My comment was removed.
Simply the formation seen is a salt crystal forming on the surface of the slide.
Given that my comment was removed for simply expressing an informed opinion says a hell of a lot about this blog.
Because it’s salt does not mean that I am pro vaccine, completely the opposite. But if this page wants to suggest a salt crystal is something else then I would think that there’s an agenda to divert attention away from other constituents which are far more worrying.
Look up salt, or human tears on a microscope slide and you will see crystals of tye same type.
Guess this comment we be removed also. Came here after Vernon Coleman recomended this page. Won’t be back.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Table salt
1 month ago

Sorry but were you sleeping in the past 1 year? Because some of us were not. I followed the research all along, there are mountain high research material published how this nanotech works – it is real, like it or not, found in research documents, studies and found in vaxxes.

nanotech.JPG
Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

That graphic is what I am contesting. I’ll get back to you with details later.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Table salt
1 month ago

Very, very well explained. Thank you! I agree with you totally. Don’t worry about your comment being removed. This site is doing funny stuff, and it has sometimes been a challenge for me to post, but it is equipment failure, not nefarious action by people. Your comment is here.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Pat and Merv and Rhoda, really, does it matter? I mean, the nanotech is there, the graphene is there, they have no role in a normal vaccine made for protection (if you believe that that type exists at all). Did I miss something? Why does it matter that how they self-assemble or being assembled by other nanotech particles or whatever? – in either way, it is nanotech, no one gave informed consent and it is clearly killing people.

inside a Faraday bag stopped the structures from forming” – that part we knew, La Quinta Columna and S. Peters had an inteview with Matt Something (sorry) who claimed that depending on radiation exposure the structures form, build together or ‘melt back’ – which … why? What’s the point, but nevertheless he also showed recordings. He had 2 inteviews with SP, if someone wish to look them. (Rumble)

Self-assembling part back then was demonstrated with Tesla poresis, sometime around the ‘end’ of orwell.city, La Quinta Columna published interesting images about another structure (but computer-part looking ones) which was like a growing plant with crystals (collecting crystals?).

Here is the article with photos and video recording about the weird stuff.
https://www.orwell.city/2022/03/strange.html

The ‘crystals’ with / on a ribbon:
https://www.orwell.city/2022/02/tentacle.html

The growing vegetable-like stuff:
https://www.orwell.city/2022/02/filaments.html

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

To Rhoda:
Delgado and team listed in an older material of theirs these studies (research documents) about SELF-assembling nano network devices. But they are also listed at the end of the Mik Anderson (MAC phenomenon) video, it is more than 4 mintues long just part – only the listed studies with links to their original place and with the researchers working on them, etc.

Not for spamming, just to be sure it can be found…
from 19:53
https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I looked at these three links. Nothing relevant to the issue I raised.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I had a chance to check further into your claims in this message. Regarding teslaphoresis (correct spelling):

https://www.designnews.com/alternative-energy/so-whats-teslaphoresis-and-how-can-it-make-self-assembling-circuits

More:

https://nanolab.usc.edu/research/carbon-nanotubes/

When is the last time you saw a Tesla coil near a patient or a microscope slide?

PS nanotubes are not circuits. Moreover, if you assume the threads are nanotubes, there is no visual evidence they are assembling into anything.They’re randomly formed. And some authorities think they are wormlike parasites anyway. That means they’re not nanotubes in the first place. Who is right? I still maintain: NO CIRCUITS. Whether the nanotubes “self-assemble” or not.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

DO YOU SEARCH THIS? 🙂
“LA QUINTA COLUMNA CONTINUES EXAMINATION OF PFIZER VACCINE: FILAMENTS ATTRACTING CRYSTALS & APPARENT MICROCIRCUITRY“https://truthcomestolight.com/la-quinta-columna-continues-examination-of-pfizer-vaccine-filaments-attracting-crystals-apparent-microcircuitry/

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Sorry, no circuitry. And by the way, graphene makes hexagonal crystals, not rectangular. These are just crystals. Crystals are not circuitry. I do not have a lot of time and patience for videos. While I appreciate the documentation, please stick to something RELEVANT. If I have to keep watching videos that are not relevant, I will tune you out.

The problem is, these people have no background in electronics or circuitry. I do. I am familiar with the process needed to make integrated circuits. They are not yet making integrated circuits that small or with graphene.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

They are not yet making integrated circuits that small or with graphene”
again:
you labor under the delusion that there does not exist technology any more advanced than is currently known….
the fact that the US gov’, for instance, kept ‘stealth technology’ under wraps for almost 30-odd yrs should, clearly, expose that false assumption….

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

And you missed my point. They may be able to hide the technology. They can’t hide people’s blood. If this technology is BEING USED in the Covid shots, it would show up. They haven’t found it. What they have found is being misinterpreted. It’s nothing more than crystals, threads (morgellons?), and small living organisms. No circuits.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

If this technology is BEING USED in the Covid shots, it would show up
it IS ‘showing up’ ;
there is more-than-enough evidence for that;
in fact: more-than-enough to prefer actual criminal charges and, maybe, even sustain a conviction in a court of law…

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

There is plenty of evidence of the nasty things in the shots, and their deadliness. What is NOT showing up is the CIRCUITS people are alleging. And what we ARE seeing is enough to convict of crimes against humanity. But if you assert claims of things that are NOT there, you HELP our enemies. So cut it out! There is NO evidence of circuits in the blood of shot victims that I have seen, and I have looked at much. If you have something that shows circuits, show me, but don’t expect me to believe you otherwise. The presence of circuits is NOT NECESSARY to convict of crimes against humanity. Unless you really want the jury to find them not guilty. If you present evidence of things that are not there, that can happen.

Equivocation is a fallacy.

David A
David A
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

I do not hear Pat denying that vaccine harms are real, and that what is shown is not harmful.

As a layman, I am curious about two things in the video from this post. Does a faraday cage stop the activity shown, and would that happen with normal crystal growth? If not, what does it mean.? And the video shows multiple angeled (malformed) “units” of several and disparate size structures moving as one unit, and then a piece separating (a single elongated piece) and moving towards the growing center crystal area, apparently stimulating it somehow. (From the upper left) Is this normal crystal behaviour?

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Who creates the “appropriate” evidence? Those people you know don’t produce. But those beings you don’t know may more than you can dream up. But to agree with that, you would have to look at yourself. And editing the reality you live in. You know as much as you’ve been told. And I still don’t understand why you consider yourself a better expert than others.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

I do not consider myself a “better expert” than others. I simply have more relevant knowledge. I have been married to one of the top experts in both computer hardware and software in the country, who has a PhD in electrical engineering, and who started a company offering computer-based services, that is now a household name. And we talk, and he educates me. The people who are making the claims there are circuits in the blood that self-assemble or are assembled by tiny machines or bots in the blood do not have credentials in relevant fields. They don’t know what they are looking at. I consider myself more knowledgeable than they are about this one particular issue.

Maria
Maria
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

“top experts” in computer hardware and software are not found outside tio secret military circles.
In other words, everything that you think you know is nothing but “stoneage” to the public.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Maria
1 month ago

You missed the major evidence. Although we do not have access to military secrets, we DO have access to people’s blood. None of the things they have found in the blood, that I have seen in multiple videos, shows CIRCUITS, and that is what is needed to substantiate the claim of self-assembling (or otherwise) nano technology. Nobody that I have read yet has responded to this obvious fact.

GunDelete
GunDelete
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You missed it, ‘you don’t but the MAC stuff’. As it has many proofs and anyone can test it, please let me know how some crystals or whatever could do it.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

Your comment doesn’t make enough sense to me for me to respond intelligently.

I am not claiming crystals do anything specific to MAC. I am claiming the opposite.

George Tirebiter
George Tirebiter
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Pat,
Thanks for calling this out. I’ve been hesitant to accept the nano-tech myth discussed here ever since it popped up on alt sites. Coincidentally(not) it’s been pushed hardest by those sites and ‘doctors’ that already exhibit clear signs of being controlled opposition. La Quinta Columna called it accurately when they stressed graphene being magnetic, attracted to highly magnetic areas of the body, such as the heart (thus dead athletes) and nervous system (assorted responses) and highly activated by 5G frequencies on top of Dr. Noak’s discussion about graphene’s heavy damage to blood vessels. In my opinion you’re right about the nano tech claims here being false. The evil ones running this operation are counting on most people being ignorant about this tech and the supposedly aware folks buying into the idea that just because it’s not well known doesn’t mean it’s non-existent.
Your comment that the masses are already controlled by their phones and advertising reminds me of when it became crystal clear that we are f**ked, and that was walking in a packed Costco on a Saturday and I was the only one without a mask on. The evil ones, just like most people, go for the low hanging fruit, so all of this extra complication, even if it is possible, doesn’t make sense. Cheers

Pat
Pat
Reply to  George Tirebiter
1 month ago

Thank YOU for the clearly explained message! I checked out the two people at La Quinta Columna, and one of them DOES have a degree in a relevant field, although it’s not clear whether he is knowledgeable in this specific area. The one doing the narrating, on the other hand, is the biostatitician, who does not have a degree in a relevant area. I have observed that La Quinta Columna DID call it correctly on other issues about graphene, and I have never questioned that.

I have observed the same phenomenon of crowds of sheeple in face diapers, although I stay out of crowded places these days, to avoid other people’s spike protein. I haven’t been inside a Costco for several years. But recently I did go to a place where there were maybe a dozen or so, all wearing masks, and they tried to force me to wear one, and when I refused, they denied me services. I have the government on their tail for violations of several federal statutes.

I have pointed out several times that even though there may be technology we don’t know about and don’t have access to, we DO have access to people’s blood, and it simply does not show nano circuits. Even if this idea is not a planted story, certainly the evil side is going to take advantage of people’s gullibility.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Yes you are right, there are technologies that you have no idea about.

GunDelete
GunDelete
Reply to  George Tirebiter
1 month ago

Another nice try. What gives people dynamic MAC addresses then?

La Quinta Columna RECORDED on video the self assembling process.

I think you guys can finish the theatre here, it was a nice try but you failed.

“‘Self-assembly as a key player for materials nanoarchitectonics”https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30787960/

GunDelete
GunDelete
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Let’s make it short Pat, it was a nice try on your part to mislead others but this is the end.
“Electromagnetic-Based Wireless Nano-Sensors Network:
Architectures and Applications ”

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348355577_Electromagnetic-Based_Wireless_Nano-Sensors_Network_Architectures_and_Applications

And:
https://www.orwell.city/2021/12/technological-parasitism.html

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

First of all, cut out the false accusations. I am not misleading anybody. People such as yourself have ALREADY been misled. When I try to rescue you, you accuse me of trying to mislead. That suggests that I am doing this willfully. If you cannot have a civil conversation without making false accusations, I am done with you. How about an apology? I am now giving you a chance.

Now about your links.

First link is contemporaneous with the release of the shots. It contains the following language:

“A number of nanomachines could be deployed inside
the human body in order to detect the presence of
different biological elements in such environments.”

“Nano-sensors can be installed in the patient’s environment
to monitor her regular activities and alert emergency units to
irregular changes in her attitude.”

Citations omitted.

Notice that these things COULD be done. In other words, they have NOT been done yet.

The rest of the paper describes medical applications. From the overall content of the paper, it is evident that these nano devices are manufactured, and their manufacture is COMPLETED BEFORE their insertion into the body. They would be inserted as a small chip under the skin. They won’t be injecting graphene or graphene compounds into the body with a “vaccine” and subsequently expect these to ASSEMBLE THEMSELVES into a working device. I have argued all along that there is NO WORKING DEVICE INVOLVING A CIRCUIT in any of the videos I have seen. There is NO self-assembly going on, and there is no robot assembling anything. And this paper does not in any way suggest anything contrary to my claim.

On the contrary. There has been talk of embedding a small chip under the skin, and it is possible that a few have actually been embedded. But this has been in the news for some time. But it is a totally different animal from what the biostatitician in the SECOND video is claiming. He jumped to a bunch of conclusions based on this scientific paper:

“In other words, we’re talking about nanotechnology that recreates the communication technology we already know. But in this case, inside the body. We’re talking about nano-communications. And this is the vaccine, ladies and gentlemen. The Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Janssen vaccines. All of them are nano-technology for nano-communications. So you emit, the vaccinated ones, a MAC address in Bluetooth wireless technology. But you also receive signals as if you were a router. “

Sorry, but there is absolutely NOTHING in the paper that warrants this claim, WHATSOEVER. He lacks background in the physical sciences, electronics, electrical engineering, etc. While his associate has a relevant degree, it is not necessarily the case that he is familiar with this PARTICULAR issue.

Neither of your links supports your case. Sorry.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

And you are such a multidimensional scientist who can prove that what you write is true. Especially if you are not a vaccine manufacturer. Don’t try to save people because people know the truth without needing to edit reality.
It is really interesting to read how you present your statements on the edited reality. You have set a framework for what is true for you and ignore what you do not know. And you expect us to prove something to you. And if we don’t prove something to you, it doesn’t exist and we are wrong. You almost turn out to be “god”.
If so, prove that what you are talking about is real. Really. Not by boasting about his edited experience. Not by your conclusions.
You can’t do it, can you? All this conversation is to rely on conclusions to frame what is real.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Michal
1 month ago

People will be controlled by 5G, but it won’t be through a circuit in the blood. Your rants are repetitive and full of ad hominems. WHO ARE YOU DEFENDING? I’m done with you! I see absolutely no reason to try to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. Good-bye.

Merv
Merv
1 month ago

Another first for Aus.
3 hours may seem slow but imagine what could be done by these bots over six months?
Great work Dr. David Nixon, Maria Zee and expose’ for bringing this to the light of the world.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

They’re not bots. Just poorly formed crystals, nothing more. You read my earlier comment. I stand by what I said.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

“they’re not bots”
well…
they’r certainly behaving like ‘bots’ …..
more likely than not: this is ALIEN-type tech’……
of course: if you don’t believe that the gov’ has secret, under-ground bases ( for which there is quite substantial circumstantial/anecdotal evidence ) ….
then…
you are not going to ‘get’ it….

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

I never said I don’t believe the government has secret underground bases. That’s a fallacy known as straw man. Stick to the claim I have made.

mister bickles
mister bickles
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

straw man

i suppose, it could be construed as such;
although, of course, as you say, i don’t know what you believe abt such matters…..
my basic point was that, quite simply, we cannot know for certain what tech’ the gov’mt has access to…..or has developed…
the ‘stealth tech’ is an example of that…

Pat
Pat
Reply to  mister bickles
1 month ago

The issue of underground bases is NOT THE SUBJECT OF THIS ARTICLE nor of my concern here.

And as I said, they may be able to hide the “stealth tech” but they cannot hide the blood of covid shot victims. We have access to that. If there is “stealth tech” there, we would observe it. I have seen nothing of the sort.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

I should mention that I have seen a number of videos of this phenomenon, and some of the others show much better formed crystals. The lack of specific angles you are looking for here might well be nothing more than poor videography. It is also possible that the presence of living tissue is helping these to form poorly.

The Islander
The Islander
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

What do you think Barry R. Smith would make of all this?

John
John
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

Have you any idea how quickly the body can produce billions of cells? If these were machines they would be attacked and flushed by billions of immune cells in seconds.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  John
1 month ago

No, sadly they can’t because they are not biological material.
According La Quinta Columna your body gets rid of graphene (oxide?) with time and with the use of antioxidants like NAC.
According to Dr Andreas Noak, you can’t get rid of graphene hydroxide.

The only way would be if we ourselves would try to test it. If you have many friends, test it via the MACs when was the last vax, if it was months ago or a year or more would be better, still have MAC? Yes – we are screwed, No – we have hope.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

May I ask your friends’ approx. strike rate if you’ve tested them e.g. after a year, what percentage of your friends that you’ve tested you think still have hope? 🙂

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Yes, I am aware of graphene oxide, or other graphene and graphene compounds, and how to get rid of them. Graphene in pure form, or crystals, DO NOT EQUAL graphene CIRCUITS.

David Nixon
David Nixon
Reply to  Merv
1 month ago

Thanks Merv!

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-… […]

marlene
marlene
1 month ago

Interesting. Worth additional study.

creamwalls
creamwalls
1 month ago

Dr Robert W Malone has just published an essay on Substack in which he claims that the CIA and US intelligence services promoted the mRNA gene modifiers because they were concerned about the safety of the common people.
 
I kid you not.
 
This is basically what Malone says: “… [T]hey have to get acceptance for this technology [mRNA] because there are no alternatives. The threat is so severe, in their opinion, in their spooky world, the threat is so severe that something has …”
 
The threat that Malone is referring to is biological terrorist attacks. He says that a modern college student can buy ingredients on eBay and then in his/her garage can develop a lethal pathogen that equals anything a US biowarfare program can create.
 
So, Malone claims that because there are such severe risks of lethal biological terror attacks all over the world, the CIA felt it had no option but to spend billions of dollars forcing the experimental mRNA gene modifiers on people.
 
Malone is now using the typical Marxist slogan: It’s for your own good.
 
I’ve heard claims a while back that Malone was a shill. A patsy that’s being used to give those that resist the Globalists and gene modifiers a false sense that there’s someone fighting on their behalf.
 
What’s very unusual about this essay by Malone is that it is very badly written. It’s extremely badly worded, as if it was composed by someone under duress.
 
There’s also rumours that Michael Yeadon – a formerly prominent pharmacologist who came out against the poisonous gene modifiers – is on the run in South America and living out of a suitcase.  
 
I suspect that if Malone wasn’t a shill all along, he eventually buckled to Globalist threats and went over to the dark side. Whereas Mike Yeadon seemingly said he’d risk dying like a man rather than live on his knees.
 
The last two and a half years have only been the opening shots of the Satanic onslaught against humanity. They haven’t even got full steam up yet. The main dish has yet to be served.
 
Meantime in the good old UK two percent of the Albanian population have taken up residence there. This 2% of Albania’s population is composed solely of males between the ages of 16 and 45. The majority of these were ferried across the English Channel from France by the UK Border Control and British Navy.
 
So far this year 10,000 military aged males from Albania have come and settled in the UK. And White Englishmen have played a big part in bringing these across the English Channel – turkey’s voting for Christmas.
 
I’d hardly need to mention how the extraction of this high number of young males from Albania destroys the male to female ratio in that country, and how it also harms Albania’s economy. Likewise, the harm this influx of young single males is doing to the UK’s demographics – and this isn’t accounting for the high number of single males coming to the UK from elsewhere in the world. White British Women better get even more used to being sexually assaulted. 
 
I can only say that in 10- to 15-years’ time if the native British are living on their knees and being policed by thugs, they’ll have only themselves to blame. 

creamwalls
creamwalls
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
1 month ago

Here’s a link to Robert W Malone’s article on Substack.
 
 
This is a verbatim quote from the article:

“The problem we have is that the technology to enable individuals to engineer bio-weapons has become so trivial that a college senior working out of their, or somebody of similar education level, they can self-train, working out of their garage with stuff they can get off of eBay, can easily recreate the most lethal pathogen combinations that our government came up with in the bio-warfare program that we ran for years.”

Table salt
Table salt
1 month ago

It’s a salt crystal forming on the surface of the slide.

creamwalls
creamwalls
Reply to  Table salt
1 month ago

I think this might be cognitive dissonance as a result of people having trustfully taken the experimental so-called vaccines and now dreading to think of what type of noxious slurry that may have been injected into their veins. 

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Table salt
1 month ago

Really good point. If they are producing videos, it would have to be from slides, so what is happening there has no bearing on what might be happening in the body. Looks like salt crystals, too. And the body naturally contains salt and the elements in salt.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-… […]

kgazin
kgazin
1 month ago

Whatever the case is… I’m NOT taking it nor anyone in this household!
We are losing all faith and trust in the Medical world all together.
They either want to kill you or control you or both….(and make money off the process)

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructe… […]

chrisirish67
chrisirish67
1 month ago

hearsay and conjecture have ruled this entire covidiocy hoax from day one. anyone see people dropping like flies in the streets? nope.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  chrisirish67
1 month ago

It’s a matter of scale. How long does it take a person to drop dead? Minutes at the most. And how many people do you associate with 24/7. Nobody, actually. How many minutes is a lifetime? The time it takes to drop dead is infinitesimal by comparison.

Make no mistake. Millions have died. And I’ve already seen two vaccidents myself. So vaccidents are happening.

Feel free to scoff, and get all the death shots you want. Nobody is stopping you.

Lasse Karagiannis
Lasse Karagiannis
1 month ago

This is technology developed by Dr. Charles Lieber
https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2001/11/liquid-computing.html

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Lasse Karagiannis
1 month ago

Fascinating article. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that all of this is correct, and someone has taken the ball and run with it. It STILL would not constitute the evidence needed for the conclusion I am disputing. Here’s why. The wires he was laying in a lattice are at least an order of magnitude smaller in diameter than the smallest virus, perhaps two. You need an electron microscope to see such wires, and likewise you need an electron microscope to see any circuit made from such devices. There would be no need to assemble anything. You could put the entire circuit on a particle that could be injected whole. Nothing need be assembled. On the other hand, the graphic I disputed earlier shows devices that are a sizable fraction of the size of a penny. It’s a matter of scale.

A transistor is a DEVICE. A CIRCUIT is made up of thousands of DEVICES. People seem to be confusing devices for circuits, assuming that one of these crystals is even a device in the first place.

Ergo, what they are observing in these videos is not circuits. And that is the sum total of my claim. THEY ARE NOT CIRCUITS, and because they are not circuits, they cannot receive a signal from a 5G antenna and use it to manipulate behavior, nor would these produce a MAC address. Either a MAC address was injected at the time, or there is none. MAC addresses are, or are supposed to be, unique. When you inject multiple persons from the same vial, as they are apparently doing, you cannot plant a unique MAC address into each recipient. You don’t even know if there is anything in each shot that contains a MAC address. It could be none or many.

Your article does not disprove my point.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

Yes, everything is your point of view. And seeing others is their point of view. However, you are not a vaccine manufacturer. Also, you are not embracing the whole picture of reality. You know as much as you are told and on that basis you create a sense of the reality of what is real. Of course humans will be manipulated by 5G because that’s what other factions on the planet want. This is what the Queen of Orion wants, this is what the “other gods” want. To deny it is completely unreal from reality. Judges who deny this completely do not remember themselves. Completely unreal. I see that you also don’t remember who you are. Why are you on planet Earth. You don’t remember what’s going on here. It is not my intention to prove anything to you. Live in the world you want.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructe… […]

GunDelete
GunDelete
1 month ago

Rhoda, never better timing, from about 8 minutes.
“LIVE @ 8: Uncensored: Dr. Ana – The Science EXPLAINED – Nanotech in Injections & Quantum Physics, DetoxingStew Peters Network Published October 28, 2022 22,285 Views
Rumble, again can’t link it.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

Sorry, I do not have the time, patience, hearing, or bandwidth to watch long videos. This video isn’t even playing smoothly. It is pausing more than it is advancing. It would take me several hours to watch the whole thing.

Here is the link you couldn’t supply:
https://www.stewpeters.com/video/2022/10/uncensored-dr-ana-the-science-explained-nanotech-in-injections-quantum-physics-detoxing/

Dr. Ana Mihalcea is an MD. She is an expert IN HER FIELD. She is an internist who has done some excellent work on the damage of the shots. She is not an expert in electronics. Her opinion is that of a lay person who has been exposed to the same misunderstandings as you have.

One of her blog entries:

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/dark-field-microscopic-analysis-on

sends me off on a search of any information on MRIs being done on shot people. (But that would be irrelevant to my point). Having just done a little of that, I have learned MRIs are being used to investigate heart damage in shot people. If what she says were true, they would not be doing MRIs on these people. If they tried it, they would not complete the test. I am not at liberty to explain my personal experience with MRI in this regard, so I will just say that any magnetic or para-magnetic material in the tissues can cause the MRI to heat the skin, and it may be enough to cause damaging burns. So they would not proceed, if this magnetism were widespread. Something to keep in mind is that graphene, unlike spike protein, DOES NOT REPLICATE in the body, and only a limited amount can be included in the shots. While there may be a sufficient concentration at the injection site to display magnetism that will attract metal objects, once it spreads through the body, the concentration will be insufficient.

You can undoubtedly find other examples of people who have swallowed ideas expressed by lay people who have no background in the necessary fields. Please spare me the trouble of refuting each one in turn. If you want to make your case, send me a link to scientific papers written by people in the field. I have already refuted some of this as evidence against my claim there are no self-assembling CIRCUITS in the body as a result of the clot shots.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

The only person here who has swallowed the blue pill is yourself on a desert island. With a fragment of knowledge on which you weave your frames of reality.

Michal
Michal
Reply to  Pat
1 month ago

You can reject whatever you want, you can deny whatever you want. Because your position will NOT affect what is true for us. Yes, 5G will jerk people. Intensively. Andromedans are also “a little” worried about that. But people can also defend themselves against it.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  GunDelete
1 month ago

PS Here is a link about using MRI to examine Covid clot shot damage to the heart: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/02/220215102839.htm

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Tijdens een interview met de Australische podcaster Maria Zeee onthulde Dr. David Nixon een video van de nanotechnologie in de Covid-injecties van Pfizer. Ze zijn niet zelfassemblerend, legde Dr. Nixon uit, maar worden geassembleerd door nanorobots of micro-machines. Het werk van deze robots gebeurt in zo’n traag tempo dat het werk dat ze doen niet wordt opgemerkt, tenzij de video wordt afgespeeld op ongeveer 100x realtime snelheid. Ter demonstratie heeft Dr. Nixon zijn 3 uur durende video gecondenseerd tot ongeveer een minuut, schrijft Rhoda Wilson. […]

Demeter
Demeter
1 month ago

Have no interest in upticks, just want to express truth as i see it.

Adam
Adam
1 month ago

Some morons will believe anything. May the gods help those poor ignorant fools, the MAGAs etc. You people are an embarrassment to the human race.

trackback
25 days ago

[…] Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-…, 28 October 2022 […]

trackback
25 days ago

[…] Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-…, 28 October 2022 […]

trackback
1 day ago

[…] Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-… […]

trackback
18 hours ago

[…] Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-… […]