Breaking News

WHO to control Health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing Official Narrative so it can manipulate Public Opinion

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The World Health Organisation (“WHO”) is now taking control of the content that is promoted on YouTube through a partnership with Google.  The aim of the partnership is to “address the spread of misinformation and disinformation.”

“WHO and partners recognise that misinformation online has the potential to travel further, faster and sometimes deeper than the truth – on some social media platforms, falsehoods are 70% more likely to get shared than accurate news. To counter this, WHO has taken a number of actions with tech companies to remain one step ahead,” WHO states on its website.

As has been proved throughout the Covid era, the propaganda machine of governments, public health bodies and international organisations such as WHO are inverting the truth.  It is they that are spreading misinformation and disinformation while at the same time censoring the truth.  Thus, it is not misinformation and falsehoods that WHO is attempting to counteract. Rather, WHO and its partners are attempting to suppress the truth while promoting a false narrative. A more truthful statement would read:

“WHO and partners recognise that facts and truthfulness online have the potential to travel further, faster and sometimes deeper than the official narrative – on some social media platforms, truth is 70% more likely to get shared than our narrative. To counter this, WHO has taken a number of actions with tech companies to remain one step ahead.”

Bear this inversion of the truth in mind when reading any of WHO or its partners’ documents or articles.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Users will have to commit to WHO-approved practices to be labelled as “reliable” in algorithm

In an attempt to limit “health misinformation,” YouTube announced it will certify medical professionals as “reliable” and “authoritative” sources of information.

Last week in a blog post on the platform’s website, its global head of YouTube Health Dr. Garth Graham said: “YouTube Health has been working on additional ways to help doctors, nurses, mental health professionals and healthcare information providers to bring high-quality health information into the spaces that people visit throughout their day – like their favourite video-sharing app.”

To apply to be labelled as “reliable,” users have to submit their license and adhere to the “best practices” for sharing health information set by the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), the Council of Medical Specialty Societies (“CMSS”), and the National Academy of Medicine (“NAM”).

YouTube gives “authoritative” sources a boost in the algorithm and non-authoritative sources are suppressed.

“In the coming months, eligible channels that have applied through this process will be given a health source information panel that identifies them as a licensed healthcare professional and their videos will appear in relevant search results in health content shelves,” the blog post says.

YouTube has been censoring medical information that contradicts the narrative of local health authorities and the WHO – even when the information provided by the WHO turned out to be false.

Republished from Reclaim the Net

“Best Practices”

In July 2021, NAM published a discussion paper to inform and provide recommendations for identifying credible sources of health information on social media, with a specific focus on the United States (Phase 1). The WHO and NAM convened a meeting of interdisciplinary experts from around the world to review and validate these principles for global application (Phase 2).  The meeting was hosted by the WHO Digital Channels Team, in close collaboration with NAM, and facilitated by the British Medical Journal (“BMJ”) on 15 December 2021:

To help address the spread of misinformation and disinformation, the World Health Organisation (WHO) is working to make credible health information more accessible. The WHO is working with the technology industry to stop the spread of misinformation and disinformation and has produced resources to help people identify non-credible sources of information.

Meeting Report: WHO online consultation meeting to discuss global principles for identifying credible sources of health information on social media, 15 December 2021

Citing recent reports the CMSS-NAM-WHO Collaboration stated in its Phase 2 Summary that 59% of the global population uses some form of social media with 90% of Americans using social media to search for health information.  Other reports, the Collaboration states, “suggest a growing amount and influence of health mis- and dis-information online.”

In response, Google/YouTube supported efforts, conducted in two phases, to develop principles and attributes to guide social media and other digital platforms in identifying and elevating credible sources of health information. The first phase was completed in 2021 by an advisory panel convened by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) and yielded the foundational principles and attributes for determining credibility of health information sources. The scope of Phase 1 was limited to United States-based entities and concentrated on non-profit and government entities with established vetting or accrediting procedures … The World Health Organisation (WHO) convened an expert panel to vet this initial guidance for a global perspective.

Phase 2 was carried out by a multidisciplinary advisory committee convened by the Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS), in collaboration with NAM and WHO. The committee was charged with adapting the principles and attributes established in Phase 1 as a foundation to evaluate other health information sources, including other nonprofit entities, for-profit entities, and individuals, with an eye towards global applicability.

Summary: Identifying Credible Sources of Health Information in Social Media, Phase 2, Considerations for Non-accredited Nonprofit Organizations, For-profit Entities, and Individual Sources, CMSS-NAM-WHO Collaboration, October 2022

The CMSS-NAM-WHO appointed committee said that establishing a set of principles and attributes by which sources can be deemed credible is a vital first step.  “Beyond the present goal of identifying credible sources, the committee emphasised the need to further explore pragmatic and effective means of managing the larger issue of health-related mis- and disinformation content,” the Phase 2 Summary states.

Recognising the implementation challenges that are likely to occur, the committee agreed that it is essential to iteratively test how the algorithms perform in accurately flagging credible sources of valid health information, and, ultimately, how consumers make use of the results.

The committee emphasised that testing of the assessment process will be critical both prior to wide-scale implementation of assessing sources (through use cases and pilot tests), and over time (following potential credible sources, longitudinally), to determine whether the processes are functioning as intended and whether there is evidence of inadvertent harm. This testing should include global platforms.

Summary: Identifying Credible Sources of Health Information in Social Media, Phase 2, Considerations for Non-accredited Nonprofit Organizations, For-profit Entities, and Individual Sources, CMSS-NAM-WHO Collaboration, October 2022

Requirements for Eligible Channels

Applicants must show proof of their license, follow “best practices” and have a channel in “good standing” on YouTube, except in the UK.  Google’s rules for the UK are simple: initially, only NHS organisations will be eligible.

On YouTube, “information panels” provide context on the source underneath the video or in search results showing information such as symptoms, prevention, and treatment options.

A “health content shelf” is “health sources” that are prioritised and show first on a list of YouTube search results.  Depending how many eligible channels are listed for that particular search term, we may have to scroll fairly far down the results list to find content that is not being promoted by WHO and/or, in the case of the UK, the NHS.

Health content shelf on search result: “From health sources”

Below are excerpts from the Google-WHO partnership regarding eligible YouTube channels:

Information panels providing health source context

As we expand outside of the United States, we’re referencing the work done by the World Health Organization (WHO), to inform global use of these principles. The WHO is a specialised agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. We may also reference work done by other agencies, such as in the UK …

In the UK, we worked with the National Health Service to develop an approach to informing which channels would be eligible for an information panel. The National Health Service is the umbrella term for the publicly funded healthcare systems of the UK. This approach included the NHS 1) reviewing the principles developed by the expert panel convened by NAM for the UK context and 2) publishing a Standard for Creating Health Content, which outlines essential requirements and best practice guidance for organisations to follow, in order to create high quality health content … As a starting point in the UK, only NHS organisations are being invited to self-certify against the NHS Standard for Creating Health Content.

Health content shelf

In the UK, the main government entity for health is the NHS and as such all NHS organisations will be initially eligible. NHS organisation channels must also self-certify against the NHS Standard for Creating Health Content to be eligible for the shelf.

Get info on health-related content, Google
Share this page to Telegram
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vaboon
vaboon
1 month ago

what a farce
Tedros isn’t even a doctor – and half the staff in the NHS are as dumb as bricks

Jay cronus
Jay cronus
Reply to  vaboon
1 month ago

Dumb and traitorous.

creamwalls
creamwalls
Reply to  vaboon
1 month ago

Dumb, low IQ and very thuggish.

mcc
mcc
Reply to  vaboon
1 month ago

I like to watch You Tube for entertainment but not politics: too long winded plus I’m a bit deaf.
For a bit of light relief I recently read through (in English) a Moliere play “The Doctor in Spite of Himself” (Le Medecin Malgre Lui) then watched it on You Tube ( with subtitles of sorts). I found it very funny and recommend it; but what was not so funny is that in reality during Covid the medical profession proved to be charlatans as in the play.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Laura
Laura
1 month ago

Time to kiss Youtube GOODBYE! As easy as pie! So much more out there…

GunDelete
GunDelete
Reply to  Laura
1 month ago

Sadly still the most well built platform with the possibility to generate subtitles under the videos, it is a great help, that’s the only reason I still use it if I can (find the material there).

As about health, take time please to check Dr Stefan Lanka’s findings. He can’t be blamed to be a controlled opposition, a virologist who stated that he is an EX VIROLOGIST as virology is a scam.

His new findings might look far fetched but the problem is that he proves everything he states and it cancels almost everything we thought we knew about our biology and health.

The two part series title is The New Body SOUL biology and the first part is required to be able to follow the second.

https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-Lanka-pt-1-Voice-Over:4
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Stefan-Lanka-pt-2-voice-over:8

Jay cronus
Jay cronus
1 month ago

Well, might help them but I believe not. Most straight thinking people exiled a couple of years ago.

JT369
JT369
1 month ago

Thank you for the warning, but at the same time please stop complaining about google, fb, youtube. It is mainstream and big corporate. And we can not change that. Use it for what it is, music and fun things. It was a fishinghook that brought us all in because it was free of censor or direction and propaganda at start(maybe).
It was a good way of finding likeminded, but it isnt anymore. Just ignore them.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  JT369
1 month ago

Problem is with “fun things” is that they divert people from what is really going on in this world. It is because of “fun things” (the entertainment and music industry, and much else) that people have been dumbed down so much, to the point that most have no grasp on what is really happening.
If you don’t believe me, look up any good dictionary and type in the word “fun”, you will find that it means a “diversion” from a true path, leading ultimately to deception, which is what is increasingly going on in our day.

Mari
Mari
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

👏

Bryan Gallagher
Bryan Gallagher
Reply to  Mari
1 month ago

‘Bread and Circuses’ for the oppressed citizens of the Roman Empire is what naturally comes to mind!

TweesleTwedle
TweesleTwedle
Reply to  Bryan Gallagher
1 month ago

It does give you an idea what is in the minds of those that took the jab
Also, although ,I dislike Campbell – I am curious of how he excuses everything when he pulls out charts showing bad results of the jab and puzzled expressions he gives trying to explain it, love some of the replies he gets

Deborah
Deborah
Reply to  Islander
1 month ago

Be careful with dictionaries. They have changed over the years, including changing definitions, to comply with what’s politically correct and acceptable. Online dictionaries are the easiest to modify. If you have physical dictionaries from decades ago, you should use those. I use ones I used in high school in the 1970s.

Carolyn
Carolyn
1 month ago

WTH! How ridiculous a health organization would partner with YouTube. It doesn’t even make sense. How obviously they are controlling what people watch. It makes me extremely worried about what they are teaching kids in school.

creamwalls
creamwalls
1 month ago

No virus has ever been shown to exist as an independent entity. Not once, not ever. No scientific laboratory anywhere in the world can produce an isolated virus of any kind with its own particular genetic characteristics.
 
Due to the fact that no viruses have ever been shown to actually exist, it’s needless to say that no viruses have ever been proven via laboratory trials to be capable of transmission from an “infected person” to a non-infected person.
 
The method which “scientists” use to “prove” that viruses exist is actually quite laughable. I’m not exaggerating when I say the modern way that scientists have of proving viruses exist is on a par with the methods that medieval alchemists used in their attempts to turn lead into gold.
 
The test subject is ill. The scientists note that the subject’s symptoms correlate with those caused by a “virus they already have had experience of”. If the subject suffers respiratory symptoms the scientist takes a biological sample from their airways for testing.
 
Never have the scientists found an actual viral entity in any material they’ve taken for testing. All they find is proteins and other very minute microscopic pieces of biological material. Some of this material will have the appearance of damage and be of the kind that will not be found in subjects that are free of illness and symptoms.
 
The scientists will then read the genetic sequences of some of this biological material. These sequences will be short and incomplete, a bit like finding a single crumbled brick in a desert and attempting from its characteristics to figure out what kind of construction it was historically a part of.
 
They’ll then choose a bit-piece of genetic sequence and feed it into a computer. The algorithm will search through its databases of sequences and find bits of other genetic sequencing that can be added to the unknown sequence to make a whole. And, hey presto, the scientists will now say this in-silico creation represents the genome of a hitherto unknown virus.
Imagine dolphins are unknown to humankind. A scientist on the sea shore takes a sample from a rock that a dolphin has brushed against. He takes this sample back to his laboratory and feeds the genetic sequence he finds into a computer.
 
The algorithms’ databases have genetic sequencing from biped and quadruped creatures. But no sequencing from dolphins.
 
The algorithm reads the dolphin’s DNA and finds the creature it comes from has been coded to have two limbs on its upper body and also two limbs (tail fins) on its lower body. It finds this creature has also been coded to have a much larger brain than an average human has. It also finds that other DNA coding in this unknown creature differs from that of the creatures in its data banks.
 
From this information the algorithm draws up for the scientist an estimation of what this unknown creature looks like in reality. It gives the scientist a number of estimations, one of which is that the creature is land based and that it walks upright on two very short legs and has two short arms with one finger on each side of its upper body. Another option is that it is land based and walks on four very short legs with no arms.
 
The ultimate decision is left up to the scientist as to what this creature is and what it looks like. He calls in his colleagues and they discuss the matter. The sample was taken from a rock onshore, so therefore the creature could be land based or sea based. The four limbs, quadruped or biped?
 
This creature is coded for a bigger brain than humans, so surely this is a very intelligent creature and therefore has possibly evolved to walk upright and use arms and hands.
 
The group of scientists mull over what the algorithm has told them and narrow down the evidence. In the end they decide this big brained intelligent creature must be land based. After all, an intelligent creature would surely evolve to live on dry land rather than in the ocean – if people think of intelligent life on other planets, they don’t think of it as living in the planet’s seas.
 
And this unknown creature has to be biped. After all, an intelligent creature would evolve to walk upright and use arms instead of struggling around on four short limbs – if people think of intelligent life on other planets, they don’t think of it as struggling around in the dirt on four legs with no arms or hands.
 
In the end the scientists have the algorithm’s estimations pretty much narrowed down to a finality. But there’s still a little bit of egotistical disagreement between them on the ultimate shape and practices of this unknown creature. So, they take a vote among themselves to finalise the reality of this unknown creature – this is based on an actual event where “scientists” in a laboratory did actually vote among themselves to decide the final reality of a supposed pathogen.
 
From a little speck of biological material, it’s quite possible for the computer algorithm and the scientists to create a totally fictional creature. The latter with their large egos can then use their adored and god-like statues in society to make this fictional creature real. And dangerous and feared if necessary. Just like they do with their fictional viruses.
 
People should differentiate between the two main disciplines in medicine.
 
We have doctors that can mend broken bones and sew up wounds after accidents. And those that can transplant organs and remove poisonous growths. These people are basically engineers and technicians.
 
Then there’s the other kind: GPs, scientists, psychiatrists and psychologists. When Big Pharma took control of the medical colleges they ensured the students being enrolled to study these disciplines were of the sociopathic, greedy, narcissistic, cowardly, egotistical and easily manipulated and controlled variety.
 
The former are very valuable to society and provide life saving services. The latter charlatans gain people’s trust because many people don’t bother to differentiate between the two.
 
By the way, to keep your cardiovascular system in tip-top shape eat at least two cloves of raw garlic each and every day. It’s important you pop the cloves in your mouth and chew them. Slicing them reduces the effectiveness. Raw garlic is proven to remove plaque and other obstructions in veins and arteries – it might even remove or ameliorate the toxins in the so-called vaccines.
 
Always keep iodine handy. If you’ve got kids or grandchildren, always use iodine to sterilise their cuts and bruises. It will cleanse the wound and the kids will absorb the iodine, which many people are lacking due to modern diets.
 
If you suffer from foot or toenail fungus, iodine will clear it in a tenth of the time that Big Pharma’s products will. If you want healthy looking finger and toe nails, paint iodine on them and you’ll notice a big difference in a matter of days, and you’ll also absorb some of it into your body, which might well be needed considering modern supermarket diets.    
 
(I searched on Google recently about the benefits of garlic. The first link that came up was to an article that denigrated garlic as being much overhyped. This article basically told readers to not bother using garlic as it didn’t have any health benefits. When I searched for garlic five years ago on Google the first page of links were to articles and studies that extolled the magnificent health benefits of eating it. They are actually demonic in how low they’ll go to keep people from being healthy.)  

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  creamwalls
1 month ago

No virus’, huh? Tell that to the Native Americans who DIED from Smallpox VIRUS contained in the free blankets given to them by this U.S. Government! Garlic kills germs. I choose to take it in capsules instead of chewing it raw.

creamwalls
creamwalls
Reply to  Jayna Dinnyes
1 month ago

Perhaps it was bacteria carried from Europe that native Americans had never encountered before that caused the illnesses and deaths of Native Americans. Or dyes in the European blankets that proved toxic to Native Americans, but which European bodies had evolved to tolerate.
 
For instance, I’ll point to how the European races have evolved to tolerate the poison that is alcohol. Europeans can drink this poison in copious amounts and then expel it from their systems over the course of a few days. Quite a high number of Asians (including Native Americans) can’t tolerate alcohol at all, even a small intake causes them serious illnesses.
 
On top of all this, when the Europeans started settling in high numbers in North America they disrupted the Native Americans hand-to-mouth way of life. The Native Americans were moved off their fertile lands and hunting grounds; thus food crops and meat became scarce or non-existent.  
 
Malnutrition leads to compromised immune systems; a weak toxin in a blanket dye or bacteria from rats that had been nesting in the blanket store might cause devastation in a famished community.  

Augustus
Augustus
1 month ago

The state/media alliance will order you what to think or say. This would be normal practice in totalitarian society controlled by China. This shouldn’t come as a suprise to most thinking people.

David Rinker
David Rinker
1 month ago

Thank you Expose for further confirmation of the seamless cooperation of all of the major institutions of the world in propounding-forcing this evil agenda upon the people. This includes all of the establishment political, academic, corporate, and media institutions.

Henrik Bentzen
Henrik Bentzen
1 month ago

OMG, but they will pay a price one day.

lionel Azulay
lionel Azulay
1 month ago

Time to boycot YT as well as PayPal, all MS Media, FB and all other social media that censor anything outside govt narratives. They obviously are afraid that people will see truth and will awaken…….

trackback
1 month ago

[…] YouTube Announces New Partnership with World Health Organisation […]

Captain Steve
Captain Steve
1 month ago

Make perfect sense. Always wrong Google/Youtube can pass the buck to always wrong WHO, promote their globalist agenda, and have someone to blame.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] YouTube Announces New Partnership with World Health Organisation […]

creamwalls
creamwalls
1 month ago

YouTube as a commercial entity on its own has never made a profit – this info comes from James Corbett. Likewise, with Twitter. Both are just very expensive propaganda tools that are used to keep the sheeple in line.
 
And considering the high number of brainless cretins that pass for customers on both platforms, both YouTube and Twitter are highly successful at dulling the minds of the masses.
 
Recently the alt-conservative US media and its readers clapped like seals and whooped cries of delight when Elon Musk “bought” Twitter. They whooped even louder when Musk “fired” Twitters’ Indian CEO, but ignored the fact that this CEO walked away with a $35million payoff – which was ultimately paid to him by the US taxpayers.
 
It’s this undeservedly set-for-life CEO that has the right to laugh at the US alt-conservative media and its readers, not the other way around.
 
Musk has actually advised that if people want to keep themselves from becoming slaves to Artificial Intelligence they’ll need to get chips in their brains. Musk’s reasoning for this so-called advice is that for humans to keep ahead of AI they’ll need to remain smarter and more intelligent than it. And, according to Musk, the only way for humans to outpace AI in intelligence is for them to have brain-enhancing chips inserted in their brains.
 
Musk recently gave a talk where he rolled out a robot. I kid you not, this robot was exactly similar to the types of robots that were around in the 1970s. It could walk forward, move its head and arms and that was about it. This is whilst other robot manufacturers are showcasing creations that can do back-flips and other impossible gymnastic feats.
 
But nonetheless, the audience clapped and cheered like lobotomised seals just because Musk has the required cool status in US society.
 
Musk has three companies, two of which have never made any profits. These two companies, though, can borrow money from the US government at almost zero percentage rates. Go figure.
 
It’s rumoured that Musk, with powerful money behind him, illegally muscled his way to ownership of the Tesla car company. This company is rumoured to have been created by people other than Musk and they were bullied out of it. Then Musk was placed there as an obedient frontman.
 
The Usurers’ can do this in the US because they own many judges. So, it’s a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot waste of time suing their puppets when they use Mafia tactics to steal your businesses and creations.
 
Musk’s company, SpaceX, also sponsors transvestites to put on shows for American children in libraries and other venues where these perverts have been recorded lifting their dresses and showing the children their groin areas.
 
Yet, the US alt-conservative media and most of its readers ran out clapping like demented seals when this blatantly Globalist frontman bought the Twitter propaganda tool.
 
It would probably be a waste of time telling them that the only reason that frontman Musk bought Twitter is so the Globalists can use it to forward their transhumanist plans. Twitter has done its job as a propaganda tool, now they want to use it to gather data on people to bring forward their transhumanist agenda.
 
Twitter is no good, though, as a gatherer of people’s data if half of the American population are not using the platform. All the people that went to Parler, Truth Social, et al, need to be brought back to Musk’s Twitter so their data can be harvested with the most up-to-date harvesting tools.

And back the fools will go whilst gloating that they’ve won a major battle for free speech. When you see how utterly easy it is to fool them, how long will it be until they believe that getting electronic chips in their heads is also a win for free speech?
 
On top of this, the governor of Florida is the US conservatives’ latest heroic gunslinger that is soon going to draw his six-shooter on the Globalist dragon and shoot it between its eyes.
 
But just in the recent past Ron DeSantis passed a law that forbids Floridians from exercising free speech. This law actually makes it illegal for Floridians to criticise Israel or question Jew’s motives. And then, as if to put the tin hat on DeSantis’ Globalist aspirations, he gave a pharmaceutical research outfit permission to release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida.
 
He gave this permission even after Bill Gates had publicly boasted that his affiliates in biological research had succeeded in genetically modifying mosquitoes to be able to spread “vaccines” to people via their bites. These mosquitoes have been called flying syringes in America.
 
If these Frankenstein mosquitos are capable of injecting people with “vaccines” by biting them, they’ll also be able to inject people with bioweapons and other toxins and pathogens.
 
DeSantis allowed this and yet claims he’s against the SARS‑CoV‑2 gene modifiers. Perhaps he thinks the mosquitos will be ethical and won’t bite people?
 
The Woke Left across the Western world are too far gone along the paved road to Hell to be talked out of their destruction. White Conservatives are the last hope for human civilization. How galling it is to see how easily even these people can be duped into chasing after a swinging carrot that has Hell and destruction stamped all over it. 

trackback
1 month ago

[…] 30. ŘÍJNA 2022 […]

Mary Longworth
Mary Longworth
1 month ago

By infesting you tube with heavier censorship, you tube will be considered as toxic and useless as the corporate CIA sponsored corporate media. The reason people gravitate towards alternative sources and share the information is it has a ‘ring of truth’. The thin thready tinny news from Corporate and government sources is corrupted and nefarious, and people see through the lies.

Jason
Jason
1 month ago

People still watch YouTube? I had no idea it was still a thing!

Jack
Jack
1 month ago

We’ve moved elsewhere. Nice try though.

P T
P T
1 month ago

Gates is the biggest funder of the WHO through his foundation and GAVI. Is this his attempt to rule the world?

pswpma
pswpma
1 month ago

There are lawsuits against the US government for suppression of free speech, so here is a way to get speech suppressed by The Who instead. US government outsourcing its speech censorship

pablo
pablo
1 month ago

Stop using YouTube. The content makers are already self-censoring anyway. They are teaching you what you are not allowed to think or say. We cannot help but internalize this way of communicating. All censorship is a diminishment of being. Being is essential to living, vital to sentience. Know thyself, Be thyself. Youtube would see you mindless, spiritless, the walking dead.

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
Reply to  pablo
1 month ago

“DIED SUDDENLY | OFFICIAL TRAILER – Streaming November 21st”

https://www.stewpeters.com/video/2022/10/died-suddenly-official-trailer-streaming-november-21st/#menu

Deborah
Deborah
Reply to  pablo
1 month ago

I use YouTube to watch specific music videos, and to get instructions such as how to attach clips to my bicycle pedals. It’s quite useful for technical instructions. I do not watch it for news or similar types of information.

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
1 month ago

WOW! YouTube is joining forces with The WHO? VERY BAD NEWS! It was reported that one of its labs formulated the AIDS virus.
R.I.P. YouTube!

Wiggy
Wiggy
1 month ago

So when Bill Gates wants to squeak, can we see his doctor’s license?

mcc
mcc
1 month ago

I’m hard of hearing; even if I wasn’t I prefer a written presentation that I can absorb in a fraction of the time. Videos are too time consuming for me.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] OMS vrea să controleze conținutul de sănătate de pe YouTube și să cenzureze tot ceea ce contrazice narațiunea oficială pentru a putea manipula opinia publică, scriu jurnaliștii de la Expose.  […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The Expose reports: As has been proved throughout the Covid era, the propaganda machine of governments, public health bodies and international organisations such as WHO are inverting the truth.  It is they that are spreading misinformation and disinformation while at the same time censoring the truth.  Thus, it is not misinformation and falsehoods that WHO is attempting to counteract. Rather, WHO and its partners are attempting to suppress the truth while promoting a false narrative. A more truthful statement would read: […]

Watcher Seeker
Watcher Seeker
1 month ago

“DIED SUDDENLY | OFFICIAL TRAILER – Streaming November 21st”

https://www.stewpeters.com/video/2022/10/died-suddenly-official-trailer-streaming-november-21st/#menu

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Sursa + Citește mai mult: Lumea lui Orwell: YouTube anunță un nou parteneriat cu Organizația Mondială a Sănătății (The… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The WHO to control health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing official narrative so… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] The WHO to control health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing official narrative so… […]

trackback
29 days ago

[…] WHO to control Health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing Official Narrative so it … […]

trackback
29 days ago

[…] – WHO to control Health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing Official Narrative so it … […]

trackback
28 days ago

[…] Click here to visit: WHO to control Health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing Official Narrative so it… […]

Cafu
Cafu
23 days ago

As if it is going to work for you World Hell Organisation didn’t you notice each time you shoot yourself in the foot
In each trial …how dumb are they really?