---

Scientists can produce fully functional viruses at the drop of a hat and in large quantities.  Multiple laboratories have been doing this for influenza for over 20 years.  Other man-made viruses include SARS and, more recently, the covid virus SARS-CoV-2.

Additional proof that SARS-CoV-2 is man-made was provided in documents recently released in a December 2023 response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

On Thursday, US Right to Know published an article describing documents they had received in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

The article titled ‘US scientists proposed to make viruses with unique features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan’ shows how American scientists planned to work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engineer novel coronaviruses with the features of SARS-CoV-2 the year before the virus emerged from Wuhan.

The documents obtained by US Right to Know, reveal for the first time that a virologist working with the Wuhan lab planned to engineer new spike proteins – in contrast with the collaboration’s public work to insert whole spike proteins into viral backbones.

The drafts and notes uncovered through the Freedom of Information Act reveal fresh details about the intended research and how scientists planned to use new reverse genetics systems and test viruses in vivo – in other words, to engineer live novel viruses.

The documents show that the scientists behind Project DEFUSE proposed a strategy to stitch SARS-related viral genomes together using six pieces.

The Project DEFUSE proposal was submitted by EcoHealth Alliance, led by Peter Daszak, to the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA) on 27 March 2018. DARPA rejected the proposal, ultimately choosing 5 other groups for its PREEMPT initiative. The proposal describes, in great detail, experiments which could have directly resulted in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that emerged in Wuhan in the fall of 2019.

“We will identify the best consensus candidate and synthesize the genome using commercial vendors (e.g., BioBasic, etc.), as six contiguous cDNA pieces linked by unique restriction endonuclease sites that do not disturb the coding sequence, but allow for full-length genome assembly,” EcoHealth’s DEFUSE grant proposal stated.

“[US Right to Know’s] bombshell article [describes] the purchase of a specific endonuclease by EcoHealth. This endonuclease was the enzyme needed to splice genes to create the ‘covid’ virus,” Dr. Ah Khan Syed said and explained what this all means.

The Smoking Glove

By Dr. Ah Kahn Syed

Look at the headline and the date. It’s 2024. We are still talking about this 4 years after Pradhan released his “Uncanny Similarity” paper that showed that the SARS-Cov-2 virus was lab-made and reiterated in our article from December 2021.

[Dr. Ah Kahn Syed is referring to the article ‘US scientists proposed to make viruses with unique features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan’ published by US Right to Know which was written by Emily Kopp.]

What does it mean?

There is just one takeaway from Emily’s article which I will explain in summary form and then in lay language so bear with me.

Ecohealth, the people who were accused of making the Wuhan virus, were found to have ordered a very specific splicing enzyme that was identified in a publication in 2022 that showed that whoever had used this enzyme to splice viruses likely created the covid (SARS-CoV-2) virus.

So, to explain.

A “restriction endonuclease” is an enzyme – a biological agent that makes a chemical reaction happen that otherwise wouldn’t – that chops up DNA strands at specific points in its code.

Here’s an example for BamHI (they don’t have trendy names, sorry) which cuts strands of DNA in this pattern “between the two adjacent ‘Gs on a strand with the code GGATC”.

The opposite strand is the mirror image but you can see that reading in the opposite direction fulfils the same criteria for the cut so that’s where the cut happens – on both strands thus completely severing the DNA. Often, but not always, this leaves an irregular overhand between strands (remember DNA has two opposite or complementary strands of code, RNA usually only has one strand) which are called “sticky ends’“ and allow the DNA ends to recombine readily with whatever you are planning to throw in the mix.

Of course, this is a lab thing rather than a nature thing. And it’s a method that is used all the time to add bits of DNA into a segment of DNA. Think of it like splicing a tape cassette in the old days.

From the DNA the laboratory scientists then create RNA viruses. And yes, you can create whole infectious RNA viruses from a DNA clone. They have been doing this for influenza for over 20 years as well as for SARS and, more recently, SARS-Cov-2 (covid).

Yes, to reiterate so you can bring your jaw off the floor, multiple labs around the world make “infectious clones” – essentially moulds – from which they can produce fully functional viruses at the drop of a hat in large quantities and have been doing it for at least 20 years.

So, that’s one of the ways to make a virus. And it may or may not have been the way they made the covid virus but it certainly happened in a lab.

How do we know?

Well of course we have talked about this before:

• Absolute proof: The Gp-120 sequences prove beyond all doubt that “covid-19” was man-made
• How to BLAST your way to the truth about the origins of covid-19

Buttoday’s story is an independent corroboration of the story above (which relies on the fact that the genome sequence of the virus is so unique it is impossible to have emerged from nature).

The corroboration comes from the fact that a paper was published in 2022 showing that the “endonuclease fingerprint¹” demonstrated, beyond a reasonable level of doubt, that the SARS-Cov-2 covid virus was man-made because it had an unusual level of restriction sites for specific endonucleases that could have not happened by chance.

Within the findings of the study were two facts that stood out:

1. The endonuclease BsmBI was necessary to make the specific cuts needed to splice this particular virus
2. The BsmBI “cut sites” occur in a few coronaviruses but NOTin the two coronaviruses, which were likely fake anyway, that the scientific establishment claimed were closely enough related to covid that it could have emerged from them.

In other words, if a lab was found to have been using the BsmBI enzyme in conjunction with coronavirus research it is the “smoking glove” (those of you old enough to remember the OJ Simpson trial will know what this means) that confirms independently that a lab-made the virus.

So, what happened yesterday?

What happened yesterday was equivalent to finding a glove that perfectly fit the hands of Zengli Shi and Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, the group implicated at the very beginning of this charade as being the makers of the coronavirus. After a Freedom of Information request, US Right to Know got a copy of an order form for R0580L, which is the BsmBI restriction enzyme.

So what? It’s a lab product?

Sure. But this was under the heading of the DEFUSE proposal for creating bat coronaviruses that EcoHealth Alliance and the Department of Defence denied went ahead. They said it had been cancelled. Yet they ordered reagents for the project.

“Just coincidence” right?

Of course. This is circumstantial evidence. But in this case, there is so much circumstantial evidence it becomes impossible to ignore and the reason for a cover-up becomes the focus of attention.

And what else should happen today, just to cement this “nothing burger” as likely to be, in fact, a very meaty meaty burger?

Well on Twitter there is a war raging to distract everybody who could possibly highlight, expose, share, understand and talk about this story. These events are designed to waste everybody’s time and divide and conquer dissident groups. They are age-old techniques used by tyrannical regimes to stop people from talking to each other because we can’t have that, can we?

So please, remember to do the exact opposite of what these people want.

Learn to read these stories.  Try to understand them.  Please share them.  If the person you are sharing with doesn’t understand them, try and help them.

This will be the perfect time to end today’s article and hand over to the excellent Jessica Rose to give you a slightly different view of the same story.

Read more: Focused take-down of the bad guys, Jessica Rose, 19 January 2024

Please share and discuss whichever of these works for and resonates with you, because this story and the attached stories are important.

Remember as well that our voices are being silenced on a daily basis by techniques of intimidation and censorship.

Even when those fail, and they always will, the people trying to silence us will just shout and make noise. Our articles are there to help you see through the noise and give you the resources to shout back.

Make your own noise.

Notes:

¹ “Restriction map” for SARS-COV-2. Somewhat like forensic DNA fingerprinting the places where specific enzymes cut the DNA of a clone are specific to the clone itself. The map shows the specific sites where particular enzymes cut the viral sequence.

About the Author

Dr. Ah Kahn Syed is a pseudonym for a medical science whistle-blower who publishes articles on a Substack page titled ‘Arkmedic’s blog’.  Dr. Ah Kahn Syed also posts information on Twitter and Telegram as Arkmedic.