|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The book ‘Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident, or Intentional?’ presents a thorough exploration of the origins of HIV and Ebola viruses. It clearly explains and documents how, when, where and why the viruses that now threaten humanity’s extinction were made and got loose, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz said in 2016.
We’re not just talking about AIDS and Ebola. Today, civilization is challenged similarly by ZIKA, the West Nile Virus, H1N1-H5N1 flu virus recombinants, and more.
To grasp the “bigger picture,” researchers and educated consumers need to understand the basis for all these new “emerging viruses.” This is best done by reading the actual government contracts. These records even show how much the viral engineers and vaccine makers were paid for what amounts to “genocide,” according to Dr. Horowitz and many other whistleblowers.
The above paragraphs are taken from an email sent out by Medical Veritas in 2016. Twenty years after Dr. Horowitz discovered the text of the US Special Virus Cancer Program, Medical Veritas, for which Dr. Horowitz is editor-in-chief, circulated and published this email that described how the text was discovered and its implications.
“Initially concealed for ‘national security’ reasons by federal officials, this Special Virus Cancer Program text is must reading for any serious cancer researcher,” Medical Veritas wrote.
Background for Context
Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is a renowned authority in the fields of public health, behavioural science, emerging diseases, and natural healing. He is a Harvard University-trained expert in health education and media persuasion, with additional expertise in genetics, electrogenetics, virology, and vaccine research and development.
Dr. Horowitz announced in 1997 that while searching for the final piece of evidence to conclude his research on the origin of the AIDS virus, he had discovered the Special Viral Cancer Program (“SVCP”) text in the Chapel Hill Davis Library the year before.
The New York Times published an article on 19 November 1972 about an agreement between Soviet Union and United States cancer specialists to expand joint efforts in the fight against cancer. The article mentioned when the US cancer programme began: “In the United States, a Special Virus Cancer Program has been officially funded by Congress since 1964 at the rate of $50 million a year. It encompasses 131 research institutions.”
In around 2002, there must have been an accusation made that the SVCP created the AIDS virus because on 17 June of that year, the US General Accounting Office (“GAO”) sent a report to James A. Traficant, Jr. member of the House of Representatives and concluded: “There is no evidence that SVCP created the AIDS virus.” In its correspondence with Rep. Traficant GAO also noted:
In 1972, SVCP developed a flowchart depicting research programme to investigate viral oncology (the study of how viruses cause cancer). Outcome of SVCP did not lead to discovery of viruses in human cancer cells, but did result in several advances in molecular biology.
Origin of the AIDS Virus (17-JUN-02, GAO-02-809R)
While we do not know what flowchart GAO was referring to as the attachments are not included with the correspondence above, the 1972 date led us to an invite to the Seventh Joint Working Conference of the SVCP held on 1 November 1972 archived online by the Wellcome Collection. The invite, from SVCP chairman Dr. J.B. Maloney, was printed on the letterhead for the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, now called the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”).
We haven’t read the 21-page invite but skimming through it, we noticed a few interesting remarks:
It may be that tumour-associated molecules we seek are not due to mutations, but rather are the result of virus infection. The genes for the proteins in question may be the product of viral genes … Could human cancer be due to virus infection, could the tumour-associated molecules or antigens be the product of these viruses, can human cancer be prevented by vaccination? These were exciting ideas. [page 5 & 6]
It is obvious a large programme could be built around them. Large programmes can only be built around concepts that can be put in one or two words: SPACE, NUCLEAR, ENERGY, POLLUTION, CANCER VIRUSES. The result was the largest planned, integrated, generously funded biological programme in the entire history of the planet. It was the testing ground of many new administrative concepts. It marked the entrance of planners and planning from the Department of Defence into the biomedical arena. Use was made of contract research on a large scale, of the expertise in management and programmatic research of industry. Research laboratories in this country and abroad were mobilised. The triggering event was the discovery of virus-like particles in human leukemic plasma – VLPs as they came to be called. [page 5 & 6]
The search for oncogenic virus did, however, take an exciting turn: human upper respiratory viruses – adenoviruses – were found to cause cancer in newborn hamsters. The same was true of the monkey virus, SV40, which had been a contaminant of some lots of early Salk vaccine, had not been completely inactivated, and had been injected live into thousands of humans including quite a few infants. [page 7, emphasis added]
[Note: The AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine, also known as Vaxzevria, is a viral vector vaccine that uses a weakened chimpanzee adenovirus to deliver genetic material to the body. Pfizer’s covid vaccine contains an SV40 promoter.]
Interest now turned to RNA viruses and to the reverse transcriptase involved in their reproduction … The virus genes had somehow become incorporated into the normal genes of the animal and spread throughout the whole species … Here, then, is a gene brought into animals eons ago allowing the appearance of a new antigen not previously found in the species. Not only that: even though the gene caused a disease – cancer – it spread and became universal … There are some aspects of this concept that are too good to miss. If genes can be transplanted willy-nilly around the animal and plant kingdoms, then this could be a mechanism for promoting evolution par excellence. Many viruses cross species barriers. Some viruses will infect both plants and animals. If we knew the full map of the cross-species infections. I believe that we could find a gene that could be transported from almost any organism to almost any other. One could conceive a vast viral postal system routing genes around “on approval.” An amoeba may develop a better phosphatase than I have, and the gene involved may reach me piggyback on London Flu. Quite exciting. [page 8, emphasis added]
Meanwhile researchers from around the world have been sequencing proteins from many different species and have come to the very opposite conclusion. Evolution occurs very slowly, one amino acid at a time. [page 8]
Invite to Seventh Joint Working Conference of the Special Virus Cancer Program from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 21 August 1972
What do you think the author might have been getting at? Was the SVCP only about discovering what caused cancer?
Due to the outside chance that documents such as these may not be available for public view at some point in the future, for whatever reason, we have attached a copy of the invite to the Seventh Joint Working Conference of the Special Virus Cancer Program below.
Overview of the Special Virus Cancer Program
The following is a summary generated by an artificial intelligence (“AI”) program in response to the query “Special Virus Cancer Program August 1972.”
The Special Virus Cancer Program, also known as the SVCP, was a research program initiated in August 1972 to investigate the role of viruses in the development of cancer. The program was a collaborative effort between the United States and Japan, and its primary goal was to identify and isolate viruses that could cause cancer in humans.
The program was led by Dr. Frank Rapp and involved a multidisciplinary team of researchers from various institutions. The team used a combination of laboratory experiments and clinical studies to investigate the relationship between viruses and cancer.
During the course of the program, the researchers identified several viruses that were associated with cancer, including the human T-cell leukaemia virus (“HTLV”) and the human papillomavirus (“HPV”). These findings led to the development of new treatments and prevention strategies for cancer, including the use of antiviral therapies and vaccines.
The SVCP also led to the establishment of the United States and Japan Cooperative Cancer Research Program, which continued to support research on the relationship between viruses and cancer. The program’s findings have had a significant impact on our understanding of cancer and have led to the development of new treatments and prevention strategies.
In terms of code, there is no specific code related to the SVCP, as it was a research program and not a software development project. However, the program’s findings have led to the development of new software tools and databases for the analysis of genomic and proteomic data.
[The paragraph immediately above appears out of place however the AI program may have inserted it due to the differences in English and American spelling. In British English, “program” is used to describe computer software and “programme” is used to describe a plan, system or TV show. In American English, “program” is used to describe both. As the ‘Special Virus Cancer Program’ was an American initiative, we used the American spelling in our search query.)
Here are some relevant references:
- Rapp F. Special virus cancer program: travails of a biological moonshot. Science. 1972;175(4026):1061-a.
- Gross RE, Van Zee KJ, Heerdt AS. The Special Surveillance Breast Program: a model of intervention for women at high risk for breast cancer. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1997;28(4):9-12.
- Sullivan J, Suyono H, Bahrawi W, Hartoadi A. Contraceptive use-effectiveness in Mojokerot Regency, Indonesia: a comparison of regular program and special drive acceptors. Stud Fam Plann. 1976;7(7):188-96.
- Sakurai Y. Rehabilitation in women with breast cancer-special problems in hereditary diseases. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986;13(4 Pt 1):871-7.
Source reference: Rapp F. Special virus cancer program. Science. 1972 Mar 10;175(4026):1061-2. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4026.1061-a. PMID: 17797370.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Special Virus Cancer Program – Must Reading for Cancer Researchers
[Please note: We have not edited the original in any way so American spelling is used in the text below.]
Initially concealed for “national security” reasons by federal officials, this Special Virus Cancer Program text is must reading for any serious cancer researcher.
MEDICAL VERITAS INTERNATIONAL INC.
NEWS RELEASE
Release: No. 96-2016-EV/6
For Immediate Release
Date mailed: December 5, 2016
Contact: Ed****@************as.org
Special Virus Cancer Program Concealed Contracts Evidencing Man-Made AIDS Pandemic Released in 20-Year Anniversary of Amazing Discovery
Honolulu, HI — Twenty years ago Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz presented a shocking new theory on the man-made origin of HIV/AIDS at the XI International Conference on AIDS in Vancouver where he challenged the virus’s purported “discoverer,” Dr. Robert Gallo. That session was video taped, republished widely on the Internet, viewed by millions, and eventually cost Gallo his Nobel Prize in Medicine. it also got Horowitz blacklisted from the medical lecture circuit.
[We have uploaded a copy of the video referred to above from Revolution Television (see below). The description below the video on Revolution Television’s website reads: “Where did AIDS come from? Some say it doesn’t matter, as long as we find a cure. But what if the man and money that created it, are still spreading it along with lies and half-truths? Watch this clip from In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism, to learn where AIDS really originated.”]
To celebrate this anniversary, and the lives of more than 20 million people worldwide who have since died of AIDS, Horowitz is republishing the National Cancer Institute’s censored Special Virus Cancer Program text originally published in 1972, for the eyes of only top officials.
Background
In a 1996 press release, Horowitz, a Harvard-trained public health expert and medical educator, revealed that the AIDS virus (HIV-1) “did not likely originate naturally from African green monkeys,” as Dr. Gallo had promoted, nor from “Patient Zero” – a gay flight attendant named Gaetan Dugas. Instead, Horowitz’s three-year study concluded that the virus, and the associated pandemic, more likely evolved from early cancer virus vaccine experiments in which top military–pharmaceutical scientists infected monkeys and chimpanzees with viral genes from other animals to produce an array of “novel” illnesses. The primary focus of massive money and drug company investments was on the never-before-seen leukemia-lymphoma-sarcoma immune-suppression cancer complex now called AIDS.
“Such methods of recombining “novel” cancer triggers used by National Cancer Institute (NCI) researchers during the ‘Special Virus Cancer Program’ in the late 1960s, aimed to develop cancer “models” for human vaccine trials. The largely-funded mostly-secret program “generated grave outbreak risks” Horowitz concluded in this “first in-depth scientific exploration into the origin of the epidemic.”
Earlier this year, a massive amount of publicity attended the Science journal (04 Mar 2016: Vol. 351, Issue 6277, pp. 1013) that, finally, debunked the “Patient Zero” theory. A “new genetic study of HIV isolated from blood samples taken in the late 1970s clarifies where and when the epidemic began in the United States – and it does not involve a man infamously labeled as ‘Patient Zero’,” the journal published.
The Patient Zero Hoax
The Science reporters “obtained eight blood samples taken from gay and bisexual men in 1978 and 1979 for hepatitis B studies. They isolated HIV from the blood and resurrected nearly complete viral genomes. They did the same with a 1983 blood sample from” Patient Zero. They used “a technique known as the molecular clock that allows researchers to create a family tree of different genetic isolates and place them in time.” “Dugas’s isolate fell in about the middle of the tree they created of early U.S. isolates, and clearly showed that he was not Patient Zero – the first person to introduce the virus – in the United States.
“This is simply confirmation, not news,” Dr. Horowitz said, referencing the genetic studies of Gerald Myers that proved the same thing in the late 1990s.
“The ‘Patient Zero’ theory was a hoax and diversion, as is the publicity campaign surrounding it that diverts from the massive evidence and common sense that says my Special Virus Cancer Program thesis is the only legitimate scientifically-valid explanation for the emergence of HIV-AIDS – the unprecedented leukemia-lymphoma-sarcoma cancer complex ‘model’ – on three far removed continents simultaneously during the mid 1970s.
The Haiti Diversion
The new Science publication references Haiti as a likely initial AIDS virus outbreak zone, but that is also understood only in the context of the Special Virus Cancer Program, Dr. Horowitz explained. “We are now publishing the actual contracts, and these scientific contracts and previously concealed publications proves Haiti was a central experimental cancer virus research zone for more than esophageal and prostate cancers.”
To prove why Haitians should not be blamed for AIDS, Horowitz published the International Association for Research in Cancer (IARC) chart below. This he reprinted in his monumental text, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? It proves the Special Virus Cancer Program extended to Haiti. The same cancer contractors active in New York City supplying cancer viruses and experimental animals were active in Haiti. French speaking nurses in Haiti were solicited to be part of the earliest hepatitis B vaccine trials according to reputable sources.
“Accordingly, evidence that these emerging viruses evolved naturally, and then jumped species in the wild from monkey to man, or from monkeys to monkey hunters in the jungle, is minimal and all circumstantial,” Dr. Horowitz reported. “There is much more compelling evidence to support the conclusion that the Special Virus Cancer Program originated HIV/AIDS. It is far more likely the AIDS virus emerged from these NCI-funded laboratories.”
The Special Virus Cancer Program Book Recovered by “Miracle”
Horowitz’s thesis is backed by the shocking lab experiments detailed in the 425-page Special Virus Cancer Program 1972 publication. The government’s secreted text explains how and why these kinds of “special viruses” were manufactured and distributed.
“It was all done under a hush-hush program,” Dr. Horowitz explained. “The scientific publications prove the simultaneous hepatitis B experiments were conducted in New York City, Central Africa, and apparently Haiti too, during the early 1970s. And these facts best explain the occurrence of what Dr. Myers called the ‘Big Bang.’ This chief of the special AIDS project for the U.S. Government’s Los Alamos Laboratory corroborated my thesis that the sudden and simultaneous emergence of several strains of HIV around the world by the mid 1970s resulted from the secreted Special Virus Cancer Program lab experiments.
“It was really a miracle how I discovered the Special Virus Cancer Program texts from 1971 and 1972,” Dr. Horowitz continued. “I thought I was done my 3-year investigation. I needed one last primary citation that was in a Congressional Record in the basement of the Chapel Hill Davis Library. There I needed access to the “Government Documents” part of the basement under librarian supervision. I was following the librarian when I suddenly, literally, heard a loud voice inside my head that told me to ‘Stop. Turn right.’
“It was like I entered the Twilight Zone. And I needed to cajole the librarian who didn’t want me to ‘turn right’ and walk into a restricted area. It was really bizarre. The voice told me, ‘Don’t mind him. Just walk.’
“So I followed the voice and really got the librarian angry and frustrated. ‘All right. I’ll get your Congressional Record,’ the fellow finally said, as I continued to walk slowly away following the voice.
“I believe in angels, and I assume it was one I was hearing. I obeyed the direction, and followed it down a set of aisles, past thousands of books and classified records. Then it said, ‘Slow. Stop. Look down, knee high.’
Suddenly, from among thousands of volumes, the words Special Virus Cancer Program flew up into my face. I had seen those words in the funding acknowledgement sections of Gallo’s early publications with Litton Bionetics. But when I searched for those Special Virus Cancer Program records, they could not be found. They had been ‘disappeared’ from all the library catalogs.
“In that miraculous moment I reached down, picked up the book, and happened to open it to the first page of Litton Bionetics’ report to the National Cancer Institute.
“‘I think I found what I am looking for.’ I yelled across the expansive floor to the angry librarian. I then took the texts to the photocopying machine and spent the rest of the afternoon and evening photocopying the books.
“Later, in 1997, after I came out with the secreted contracts, and the library reference numbers, there were so many people requesting the volumes that officials could no longer hide the records. That’s when the volumes showed up for the first time in the library catalogs and online data bases.”
Dr. Horowitz reviewed more than 2,500 scientific reports and government documents, some obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, to assess dozens of viral vaccine studies. The chief suspects engaged a network of military and pharmaceutical industry scientists working for the Merck Drug Co., Litton Bionetics, and the Southwest Foundation, as shown in the Special Virus Cancer Program text now available for the first time for sale here. Dr. Horowitz’s complete 3-year investigation is documented in his 592-page Emerging Viruses book sold elsewhere.
[Below the video on Revolution Television are the following further resources: Dengue Fever Exposed, Zika Virus Mystery Solved and Hawaii Senator caught in bribery scandal with Pfizer and Monsanto | THE TRUTH LIBRARY]
“Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola” Dr. Horowitz said, “clearly explains and documents how, when, where, and why the viruses that now threaten humanity’s extinction were made and got loose.”
And we’re not just talking about AIDS and Ebola. Today, civilization is challenged similarly by ZIKA, the West Nile Virus, H1N1-H5N1 flu virus recombinants, and more. To grasp the “bigger picture,” researchers and educated consumers need to understand the basis for all these new “emerging viruses.” This is best done by reading the actual government contracts. These records even show how much the viral engineers and vaccine makers were paid for what amounts to “genocide,” according to Horowitz and many other whistleblowers.
Support From Officials Internationally
To further support his disturbing thesis, Dr. Horowitz’s text presents shocking testimonies by top monkey virus experts and vaccine analysts including the world’s leading vaccine developer, Dr. Maurice Hilleman of the NIH and Merck, Sharp and Dohme. Hilleman acknowledged his role in importing contaminated monkeys from Litton Bionetic’s “gang housing” facility in Central Africa. These animals were imported for research and vaccine production.
“I brought [the] African greens in,” Hilleman explained. “I didn’t know we were importing AIDS virus at the time.”
Dr. Horowitz included Hilleman’s interview, and the Robert Gallo snafu, in UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro, for which Horowitz won several major film awards, including “Best Film-2016” at the World International Film Festival competitions in Geneva and London.
Outraged AIDS activists, scientists, and public interest groups worldwide are now calling for independent investigations into Horowitz’s published facts.
Several American authorities have also urged analyses of suspected vaccines believed to be still held by the FDA. These critics include Dr. W. John Martin, former director of the Viral Oncology Branch of the FDA’s Bureau of Biologics, the government’s principal agency in charge of testing human vaccines. Martin, who wrote the foreword to Horowitz’s book, stated “the issue of possible simian … virus contamination of live polio virus vaccines has been suppressed since 1972 … This basic flaw in the regulatory process must be addressed.”
[Medical Veritas included a hyperlink to follow to purchase a hard copy of the Special Virus Cancer Program. However, the link is no longer available. Saved on the Internet Archive is a text with the same cover as shown by Medical Veritas. You can find the text saved on Internet Archive HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/06/14/aids-originated-special-virus-cancer-program/ […]
Christine Massey has sent FOIA’s to over 200 countries and institutions around the world asking for proof of numerous so-called viruses. Not a single one has been able to provide any evidence..
The Perth Group long ago showed how the HIV scam worked. Need to read their reports. Dr’s Mark and Sam Baily, Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman (to name a few) have all debunked the virus narrative.
The doctors and institutions mentioned in the article above are all part of the virus industrial complex. It’s their job to make sure that the virus fear button remains in the “on” position. Doing so ensures that billions upon billions of dollars continues to blow to big pharma.
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/
https://drsambailey.substack.com/
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CivTSuEjw6Qp/
Hi Kyle Young, what do the FoI’s you mention actually prove? If you read the FoIs you mention you’ll see they did not ask for proof of viruses – that’s why none of them provided the proof you claim. So what was the question the FoI’s asked? Did they ask the right question to the right institution? When answering FoIs the respondent will give only an answer to the exact question asked. They will not deviate or suggest that the wrong question was asked or it was badly worded, for example. They will only suggest who should be asked if the question in the FoI specifically asks who the FoI should be directed to in the event it has been directed to the wrong institution.
Additionally, remember this: People who know a virus has been made in a lab will do everything possible to ensure the blame does not land at their door. They will do their best to ensure they have no record of the man-made virus that can be used as evidence against them.
The claim that “there are not viruses” or “there is no virus” is a PsyOp to protect these very people, the people who knew covid and its vaccine were crimes against humanity, from prosecution. Don’t help them to get away with murder.
I’m a bit confused by “If you read the FoIs you mention you’ll see they did not ask for proof of viruses” in Rhoda’s response.
Responses from the CDC on Massey’s fluoridefreepeel dot ca under ‘COVID 19 FO1 RESPONSES’ for March 1-3, 2021, say
“On February 21, 2021, you requested the following information: Can you please clarify if you have any records of the separation of SARS-COV-2 from everything else (known as isolation and purification)?…” and
“The SARS-CoV-2 virus may be isolated from human clinical specimens by culturing cells…”
I guess that boils down to ‘virus deniers’ saying, “Well, if you’re claiming to have this claimed virus in cultured cells, it’s not isolated then” and ‘virus insisters’ saying, “Yes it is”.
Hi A person, if you ask a public health authority if they have isolated a virus, they will say no. I could have guessed that before the FoI was sent. At best these FoIs represent the first of what should have been a series of requests to the same organisations to piece together a picture of what they should have done according to their responsibilities versus what they didn’t do. And if it turns out they are not responsible for independently verifying a virus that has been declared a pandemic, who is.
If the FoI had asked “What method or source of information did you use to determine/establish/confirm that the SARS-CoV-2 virus exits and is a threat to humans?” That is an entirely different question to what was asked. The answer would have likely come back as something along the lines of “Our information about infectious diseases that cause pandemics comes from the World Health Organisation.”
The responses to the FoIs that “there are no virus” followers use as proof do not in anyway prove that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not exist – the “there are no viruses” followers are grasping at straws. All the FoIs you refer to prove is that whoever they were asking (which may or may not have been the correct department to ask that information from) did not hold records of isolation and purification at that time. Is it standard procedure for these departments to hold records of the isolation and purification of viruses? That would be a question for another FoI. And again it wouldn’t surprise if me the answer ultimately is: “Our information about infectious diseases that cause pandemics comes from the World Health Organisation.”
Thanks Rhoda.
Rhoda doesn’t know what she’s talking about. The FOIs show that literally hundreds (223 so far) of health/science institutions (where people have been passing themselves off as “experts” and are involved in the fear-mongering, fake tests, poisons, etc.) have zero scientific evidence from anywhere in the world of “SARS-COV-2” (or any other alleged virus that they’ve been asked about) existing.
The FOIs were inspired by what was already know about virology – that it is not scientific and that virologists never even have a sample of their alleged “viruses” on hand to study.
It seems that Rhoda would like you to think that it’s no big deal that 223 institutions have been FOI’d and ZERO have been able to cite valid scientific evidence of “SARS-COV-2”.
Maybe she would also like everyone to excuse all these frauds and idiots because maybe it wasn’t “standard procedure” for them to have to verify that “viruses” actually exist… and so they should get a free pass based on the “just doing my job” excuse.
And fyi, we have many more FOIs on other imaginary “viruses”, and on the topic of allegedly “pathogenic” bacteria, and on the fake-controls that are sometimes used in virology, and on contagion… resulting in zero valid scientific evidence for claims of pathogenic “germs” or contagion on illnesses. You can find the links here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
Hi Christine Massey, What have you done with your “evidence” from “literally hundreds of institutions”? Have you tested it in a court of law to see if it stands scrutiny, for example?
It was tested in court, Stefan Lanka measles case and finally he won it.
It was also tested by a German engineer who was fined because of breaking covid rules, he used this line (the no virus line) and the case was dropped with the speed of lightening to avoid spreading the news about it.
“German Engineer Marvin Haberland Challenges the Existence of Covid Virus in German Court“
on truthcomestolight
You don’t know what you’re talking about. If you ask about “isolation” they will say yes of course the virus has been isolated. And despite my FOIs clarifying that I’m asking for records of purification, they still often cite bogus studies. They have EVERY motivation to be able to back up their claims with legit studies but cannot because virology was never a science. How anyone in the ‘health freedom’ space can still not understand this (despite it being explained over and over again), I find very strange and disturbing.
A BIG thank you to you Dear Christine!, sadly my previous comment was removed which included the thank you part, so in this one I write nothing else.
Rhoda, you are sabotaging my work and the massive body or work of other no-virus people, and scaring people unnecessarily. My response to your false claims is in blue allcaps below.
Hi Kyle Young, what do the FoI’s you mention actually prove? If you read the FoIs you mention you’ll see they did not ask for proof of viruses – that’s why none of them provided the proof you claim. THIS IS FALSE, AS MYSELF AND OTHERS HAVE ASKED NUMEROUS TIMSE FOR SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF A “VIRUS” AND NONE WAS PROVIDED. FURTHER, YOU STILL DON’T SEEM TO COMPREHEND THAT THE PURIFICATION OF PARTICLES IS NECESSARY TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OF A VIRUS. ALL 223 QUERIED INSTITUTIONS FAILED TO CITE EVEN EVIDENCE OF PURIFICATION.
So what was the question the FoI’s asked? Did they ask the right question to the right institution? When answering FoIs the respondent will give only an answer to the exact question asked. They will not deviate or suggest that the wrong question was asked or it was badly worded, for example. They will only suggest who should be asked if the question in the FoI specifically asks who the FoI should be directed to in the event it has been directed to the wrong institution. FOIS ARE NOT ABOUT ASKING QUESTIONS, THEY ARE REQUESTS FOR RECORDS, AND MY FOIS WERE NOT DIRECTED TO “WRONG INSTITUTIONS” OR BADLY WORDED. SEE ABOVE.
Additionally, remember this: People who know a virus has been made in a lab will do everything possible to ensure the blame does not land at their door. They will do their best to ensure they have no record of the man-made virus that can be used as evidence against them. COOL AND SCARY STORY, WHICH YOU HAVE ZERO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT.
The claim that “there are not viruses” or “there is no virus” is a PsyOp to protect these very people, the people who knew covid and its vaccine were crimes against humanity, from prosecution. Don’t help them to get away with murder. WHAT A RIDICULOUS CLAIM. NO-VIRUS PEOPLE ARE SHOWING THAT THE ENTIRE FOUNDATION FOR QUACKCINES, MASKS, ANTIVIRAL DRUGS, DISTANCING, TESTING, ETC ETC ETC HAS BEEN BASED ON FRAUD AND DELUSION FOR THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF VIROLOGY.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO CITE VALID SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO BACK UP YOUR FEAR-MONGERING.
Dear Christine Massey, may I ask please that do you have more proof, FOIs about animal viruses, especially about which are targeted with veterinary vaccines, many times compulsory.
I am still not so fluent in English also don’t know where to write about it (to which institutes). I found one in your excellent website, among the collection of FOIs but there was just one (California if I recall well) targeting specifically this (compulsory vaccinations to out pets).
Or can you help with a sample letter and a list of institutes should be asked about this? Thank you in advance.
Not only us, humans are targeted, our animals are also part of the planned depopulation agenda where their so called vaccines can have an important role to reach their goal. The only way to prevent it is enlighten people, because of it I think more FOI would be needed targeting those non existent viruses.
Read Peter Duessberg,s “Inventing the AIDS virus”!….IF you can find a copy. Kary Mullis wrote the forword. 90%+ of AIDS sufferers were white males with heavy drug use and as homosexuals had poor diet took poppers- took many other drugs- practiced rimming- when ill were given A.Z.T Which stopped new cell growth to immaciated men! AIDS was NOT contagious! HIV could NOT be transfered to a sexual partner!- Duessberg found that in Africa the “AIDS” sufferers were mostly Hetero and only 26% had HIV! HIV is a mollecule! NOT a virus! AIDS seems now to have been a practice run for Covid!
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
https://archive.org/details/drrobertwillnerinjectshivintohimselfontv
“When Djamel Tahi asked Montagnier if Robert Gallo purified HIV, he replied: “Gallo ?…I don’t know if he really purified. I don’t believe so”. ” (find the interview, is very interesting)
https://theperthgroup.com/OTHER/nihantibodiesshort.html
[…] Source: https://expose-news.com/2024/06/14/aids-originated-special-virus-cancer-program/ […]
https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/re-fact-incredible-it-may-sound-he-acknowledged-nothing-relevance-your-end
Don’t take it personally Rhoda but you’ve got these stories, and that’s what they are, completely wrong and in a way that serves to cover up what happened, what is actually happening and the actual cause of the illnesses.
AIDS is not related to any alleged pathogen but like much else a by-product of biological systems being vaporized by toxic overload. In this instance due to massive drug use- mainly “poppers”, cocaine, amphetamines plus severe malnutrition, sleep deprivation etc.
Here’s an excellent interview with Terry Michael:
“Terry Michael on Tony Fauci”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jotSVxH3DY&ab_channel=LarryKeenChannel
“HIV=AIDS – Fauci’s First Fraud”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy3frBacd2k&ab_channel=CensoredBlunder
This is the story they would have us believe.
A deadly new virus is discovered…there’s no treatment or cure…it’s highly contagious…everyone is a potential victim…the world is at risk from asymptomatic super spreaders…new clusters of cases reported daily…
Everyone must get tested even though the tests are unreliable…positive antibody tests are called “infections” and “cases” even when the patient has no symptoms…every politician gets involved…media hysteria in high gear…activists demand salvation from government and Big Pharma…
Billions of dollars are authorized for fast track drug and vaccine research…simple, effective remedies are rejected while expensive, dangerous ones are pushed……presumptive diagnoses…exaggerated death statistics…falsified death certificates…
Covid 2020?
No. AIDS in the 1980s.
Every single fraud technique being used today to “sell” CoVid hysteria was invented in the 1980s and 1990s to sell the AIDS fraud.
Hi Allen53,, do you have more than one profile on this site? In another comment, a user with the name Gayle posted the exact same text as your first two paragraphs.
I do not and just saw that other comment.
Maybe ask Gayle where she got her comment from and have her source it.
It appears she has cut and pasted off of my original comment.
Whatever the case I hope you will research these matters further.
Horowitz’ story is complete nonsense and like so many others relies on conflations that are not based on biological reality.
Hi Allen53, Thanks for letting me know. I think Gayle must be a spammer.
I’ll copy and past my response to Gayle under this comment.
Hi
GayleAllen53, I’m not taking it personally but thanks for mentioning it. AIDS is a lot more complicated that putting it down to one cause. It has multiple causes.That there is more than one cause of AIDS is not mere speculation. It is even officially recognised. The World Health Organisation uses a different definition for AIDS in Africa than it does in the West. In short, the definition of an AIDS case in Africa, according to WHO, is malnutrition. However, also according to WHO, the definition for an AIDS case in the West is what most people associate with AIDS symptoms(immunodeficiency).
The reason for WHO using a different definition in Africa can only be to deliberately increase AIDS cases and deaths to scare the hell out of Westerners. While there may have been some genuine AIDS cases in Africa (as defined in the West), the vast majority of the estimated 19 million Africans who they claim have died from AIDS actually died from malnutrition. The genuine cases of AIDS are likely to be minuscule in comparison.
As for AIDS cases in the West there is likely multiple causes, most people recognise this, but there is ample evidence to suggest that one of them is a biological weapon which was added to hepatitis vaccines and injected into the homeless and gay communities in America and, just as the covid injections do (dubbed VAIDS), gave them acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. It is yet another example of crimes against humanity using vaccines.
What we should always bear in mind is that very seldom does a narrow “one size fits all” explanation give the whole picture of what is happening. So while your view may to some extent be correct, it is not exclusively so – to ignore or dismiss all other research and evidence which does not fit into your view would be a mistake.
The “Ebola outbreak” story is 100% fiction.
It’s yet another construct of the pandemic industrial complex/biosecurity complex with multiple purposes attached. There are no such thing as “outbreaks.”
Ebola is cover for industrial operations in Africa which produce major pollutants that have no regulations/oversight in Africa—mining, offshore oil exploration and drilling, rubber-tapping,etc.- Firestone rubber plantation- massive water pollution directly into once potable water that the locals still must drink from as there is no other source of drinking water etc.
The locals curiously then get the same symptoms as “Ebola” after drinking the polluted water.
Plus: Insecticides/Banned Pesticide Dumping in Africa, indoor spraying- walls in West African homes coated with insecticides: carbamates and organophosphates are increasingly important alternatives to pyrethroids for indoor residual spraying. Toxic Vaccine Campaigns in Africa- Beta-lactam Antibiotics- Pharma Profiteering etc. Same story in Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo.
Some alleged viral pathogen causing a scary disease named “Ebola” is the cover story for transnational looting and polluting.
Cover for good old colonialism- land theft- scramble for Africa etc.
They then make $$$ coming and going using “heroic” Western medical/doctor/nurse NGO’s to come “save the day” funneling billions into US/NATO International Aid to help the poor “savages” who are being assaulted by some submicroscopic invisible particle that seems to appear on cue in resource rich regions.
US also uses the Ebola/Marburg cover con to justify moving troops into area (AFRICOM) in order to clamp down certain areas- control a restive populace, prevent other competing entities from gaining a foothold on the region etc.
Coincidentally Ebola strikes only in these resource rich areas that then need to be sealed off. Can’t have the gold and coltan going into the wrong hands- um, I mean can’s have that nasty pathogen spreading like wildfire.
Don’t need to be a genius to figure this out- this template has been used a thousand times.
But no, it’s all Ebola/Marburg and a scary pathogen and has nothing to do with oil reserves off the Liberian Coast, diamond mines in Sierra Leone, coltan in the Congo etc…
Same as it ever was.
Supported with FAKE documentary video, watch the guy, how he is not dehydrated while “dying”, how he sits up later being bored, how his father walks away with a bunch of dollars given probably for the “actors”. That was the New York Times official documentary on the Ebola outbreak. If something is true you don’t need to lie about it or use fake videos.
3 minutes and a must watch!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUBpoyKxArU
Luc Montagnier, the man who got a Nobel Prize in 2008 for supposedly discovering HIV, told an interviewer, Jamel Tahi, of the Pasteur Institute, in 1997, that HIV was not the cause of AIDS, and admitted he never isolated HIV properly. He stated at the 1990 international AIDS conference (6/24/90) that “HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.” All this, with links, and a lot more, at Montagnier’s Monster by Mike Stone, https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/13/montagniers-monster/
Luc Montaigner had another important discovery about the electromagnetic imprinting of water, how water remembers DNA it met and can be send away and being reconstructed just from electromagnetic “tunes”.
After that he was not so much a favourite of the establishment. However he was old, he died a kind of suddenly after a speech given during the covid, questioning it.
That speech can be found on Claire Edwards’ Brighteon channel
“Luc Montagnier words at Milan demonstration (Jan.15, 2022)”
#ClaireEdwards Uncensored
More BS . There is no frigging virus.