|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The UK government implemented various lockdowns and restrictions in response to the covid “pandemic.” To visualise these responses, the Institute for Government – which “helps those working in government to improve it, and those outside government to understand and engage with it” – published an infographic in December 2022.
“I was hoping to see their follow-up, showing what a splendid job they had done in terms of actual mortality reduction,” Joel Smalley writes.
However, it appears this is not the case. So, Smalley did his own.
Here is how the Government’s covid policy affected native men and women of England and Wales.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Timeline of UK Covid Measures
By Joel Smalley
The Institute for Government (whoever the hell they are) have conveniently summarised the UK Government’s most impressive covid interventions on a nice infographic for us:
Given that these measures were ultimately supposed to reduce the number of UK citizens dying from the deadly virus, I was hoping to see their follow-up, showing what a splendid job they had done in terms of actual mortality reduction.
Alas, I could not find one, so had to do my own.
Here’s how Government policy affected native men and women of England & Wales, born in 1950 (70 years old at the start of the alleged pandemic).
23 March 2020
PM announces the first lockdown in the UK, ordering people to “stay at home.” Of course, this was not simply a withdrawal of basic freedoms for ordinary people but the start of a cascade of other severe disruptions to social and medical care, signalling the precipitous, sudden rise of deaths in both men and women.
10 May 2020
PM announces a conditional plan for lifting lockdown and says that people who cannot work from home should return to the workplace but avoid public transport. As life starts to return to normal, deaths of both men and women immediately start to fall. Go figure!
14 October 2020
A new three-tier system of covid-19 restrictions starts in England. Immediately, deaths of men skyrockets just like in the spring.
5 November 2020
Second national lockdown comes into force in England to prevent a “medical and moral disaster” for the NHS. Immediately, deaths of women skyrockets just like in the spring.
6 January 2021
England enters third national lockdown (after various nonsensical regional variations and curfews). Deaths of both men and women continue to rise at the same precipitous rate, without any interruption, for the entire duration of the interventions.
22 February 2021
PM expected to publish roadmap for lifting the lockdown (which starts first week of March). Within days, deaths of both men and women begin to fall again.
September 2021
According to NHS data, as of September 2021, over 90% of care home residents and over 80% of care home staff had received at least one dose of the covid-19 vaccine. Additionally, as of November 2021, over 70% of NHS Trust healthcare workers had received at least one dose of the covid-19 vaccine. Deaths rise for both men and women at least as quickly as normal seasonal patterns in spite of expectations for pull-forward effect due to so much excess death in the prior 18 months.
April 2022
The spring booster campaign began on 21 March 2022 in England and ran until the early summer. Instead of deaths falling as they typically do in a seasonal pattern, they remain consistently high for men and only drop marginally for women, in spite of so much prior excess that must surely be producing a pull-forward effect by now?
September 2022
NHS England confirms deployment of a single type of vaccine, the bivalent Omicron BA.1/Original “wild-type” vaccines. Deaths of women shoot up more rapidly than at any other time during the “pandemic years,” for a full, relentless six months. In spite of expectations of very long overdue pull-forward effect, deaths of men rise at the same pace and magnitude as the original spike in spring 2020.
So many Government agencies, so many interventions, so many coincidences. And every one of them coinciding with spikes in mortality when introduced and drops in mortality when lifted.
Imagine how bad it would have been without them?! It’s enough to turn you into a conspiracy theorist …
[Click on the image below which will take you to Joel Smalley’s article where you can participate in the poll.]
Appendix: The Mortality Model
About the Author
Joel Smalley is a blockchain architect and an early-stage, polymath data-driven technologist. He has a background in capital markets, biotechnology, retail payments and blockchain architecture. He conducts pro bono covid data analysis for legal challenges and independent media seeking the truth. He regularly publishes articles on his Substack ‘Dead Man Talking’ which you can subscribe to HERE.
Featured image taken from ‘Covid: UK’s early response worst public health failure ever, MPs say’, BBC, 12 October 2021
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
Instead of lock down, the guilty should be locked up for good
I thank God that I never took a jab or partook in any PCR testing, I knew instinctively from the get go that something was amiss. I was proved to be right along with all the others who declined. I do believe that good always overcomes evil every time and this will be no different. Those guilty of these abominations will either pay for it in this life or the hereafter or both.
No instinct was needed. It was smelly since the beginning. No such idiots, even in governments who would send planes to bring back citizens with a suspected DEADLY disease. They are just people, they never would have risked their own lives or their families. The first news of 5G experiment in Wuhan was out. The Daily Mail wrote an article about how the police tried to hunt down a Chinese couple in the UK who disappeared 2 weeks ago and could be a source (something you never would do in a real pandemic, you want to avoid panic no matter what).
Then they put the people arriving back from China to buses (while telling the drivers that nothing was to be feared) and let them travel hundreds of miles to the so called quarantine places (another thing you wouldn’t do in a case of a real pandemic, risking an accident and spread).
The whole propaganda was to be able to explain the non existent spread of a non existent disease. While they started to target people, probably with 5G, too but with their own mobile phones for sure (that part we experienced).
But even with just common sense, if something changes in an environment (computer or real life), the fist question must be that what has changed. And the antennas were the new thing, the essential work during lockdown.
I seriously blame the medial professionals, no way they didn’t know. The rare bilateral “covid” pneumonia was well known before as RADIATION pneumonitis. The long lost of smell and taste sensing was known as side effect of radiation treatment, basically all of the symptoms matched with the symptoms of being irradiated. But they didn’t know, sure…
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/06/20/uk-gov-covid-interventions-followed-by-mortality/ […]
[…] The UK government’s covid interventions were followed by spikes in mortality …Institute for Government…published an infographic in December 2022. “I was hoping to see their follow-up, showing what a splendid job they had done in terms of actual mortality reduction,” Joel Smalley writes. However, it appears this is not the case. So, Smalley did his own. Here is how the Government’s covid policy affected native men and women of England and Wales. […]
Poor people in the UK are so f…ed.
In Central Europe I travelled together with other people (families, groups), there was a time when absolutely no one was vaxxed on the little tourist train. Passengers were from Austria and Croatia. Next time 1/3 emitted MACs. But on the plane, full with UK passengers almost everyone, according to the detected numbers (above 70) considering the range and where I sat, it was almost everyone.
There was a time I hoped it would disappear without boosters and newer and newer graphene oxide doses introduced to the body. I guess no one goes for boosters anymore for a year at least. Wrong guess?
I can’t help the first thing which occurred to me that how many could have chosen the “experimental” vax without the RF involvement and marketing to encourage having it. Don’t be selfish and the rest, don’t kill the granny, we can make it… whatever.
And does it have anything with the Deagel depop forecast?
Hi SABIX, You say, “Passengers were from Austria and Croatia. Next time 1/3 emitted MACs.”
Setting aside the many devices that could project a MAC address which you may not have been aware of in a public place (smartphones, tablets and iPads, cameras, earphones, smartwatches etc and possibly even pace makers and hearing aids?)…
Were a third of the passengers talking on the train? When someone talks near a device, you will pick up a MAC address for them. You can easily test this for yourself. If you get a group of people in a room and ask them to remain silent for a minute or so, you will count a certain number of MAC addresses. Then if you ask one of them to talk, you will see the number of MAC addresses go up by one. If you ask two to talk you will see the number go up by two and so on. Remember that there is a delay response time to a MAC address being picked up or dropped. So give the device you’re using to pick MAC addresses up a minute or so at each stage of the experiment to settle.
I have only tested this with people, not noises, for example, coming from a television or radio (which we know our smartphones do pick up and recognise because a smart phone will display the name and artist for songs/music playing in the background).
While I don’t disagree that the MAC address phenomenon should be investigated, tests for it need to be done in a more controlled environment than a random public place as there is much more to it than the potential electronic tagging of people.
It was discussed several times, even here. They are coming from the people but devices. MAC is a protocol, no one is except , no device is except. Because of it these MACs should be identified first via by the application scanning for them, secondly if the application can’t then via the help of the websites designed for it. But they can’t be identified AT ALL. Besides they are very similar in characteristics. While rare devices like the ticket printing little machine of the driver has MAC starting with something like DD or a device identified as Amazn. T- Rex (whatever that would be) these MACs from people start with 4, or 5, 6, 7 in most of the times.
Also there was most sophisticated trials of the MAC phenomenon and there was published there like the Spanish doc’s, who first make the world aware of it, a French group, and so on. The French group even tested blood mixing it with a vial of Pfizer and after appx 90 minutes the blood emitted MAC address.
On a plane relatively few people leave Bluetooth on because Bluetooth eats the battery. So what were the sources of that more than 70 MACs (3 were identified by the application, Bluetooth Scanner).
Mark Steele last email from saveusnow also wrote about it encouraging everyone to download Bluetooth Scanner app to their Android and test it.
“When someone talks near a device, you will pick up a MAC address for them.”
How? What organ, cell-group, etc is capable in people to pick up and emit MAC normally? And where was this phenomenon (I’ve never seen it) before the covid vax? Sorry this explanation is really lame.
“Dr. Luis De Benito shares an advance of his report on the MAC address phenomenon in inoculated individuals”(orwell.city)
“3. BIO WEAPON injection is the subject of several Court cases once people find out they have been chipped and tracked and traced they are not going to be happy. Make sure you get your Blue Tooth scanner on your Android phone. Proff. Francis Boyle confirms the bio weapon injection to cause assault attempted murder and murder.“
(Mark Steele saveusnow)
The photo is from the French group Next Dose, has the link of the blood test video, that part starts at around 23 minutes.
Hi SABIX, You said: “Sorry this explanation is really lame.”
You can test it for yourself. It’s easy to do. I gave you some guidance according to how I tested it out for myself. I did this test after I saw someone test it in a wi-fi proofed room. There were three or four of them in the room to prove it for myself. In the test in the wi-fi proofed room, none of them took any devices in with them. He asked them to stay silent – no MAC addresses were picked up (If I recall correctly at least one or two were covid vaccinated). He then asked them to speak, and the MAC addresses started to register.
How or why it happens I don’t know. But as I say, you can easily test it out for yourself.
I can’t. We are not vaccinated and no matter we speak or remain silent, there are no MACs around us. AT ALL. We keep Bluetooth off on all of our tech.
You again – sorry – don’t know what you are talking about – you wrote a phenomenon as proof but did the experiment with vaccinated people.
As about the vaccinated, the explanation is still very lame, but as they have MACs that part that how that works exactly (visible or not at a certain moment) won’t change the fact that normal, unvaccinated people DON’T EMIT MACs no matter what. Only the vaccinated do it.
By the way what is a WIFI proofed room? Our house is EMF shielded, but I still can pick up MACs coming from my neighbour if they are at home. Unless you used a proper Faraday, there is no such thing as WIFI proofed room, shielding can reduce the effect but can’t eliminate it as there are holes, parts where it can’t be done properly.
Next time go to a field, park, at least 30 meters away from everyone else, leave the tech behind or switch off the Bluetooth and take people with you who are not vaccinated and possibly didn’t get any other injectables in the past 3-4 years. Bring just one phone with Android and run the Bluetooth scanner.
This whole ‘speaks or doesn’t speak’ sounds utterly fake, whenever I checked MACs the number of appearing MACs depended on only the distance of the person (moving can make them appear and disappear).
On a plane some speak, some silently read or whatever, the number of the whole detected MACs doesn’t change till they are free to switch off the belt and walk to the toilet. Nor the identification changes, that 3-4 device which were identified, will be identified again correctly, the rest are not because they are unidentified and starts with 4-5-6 or 7, rarely with 1, MACs coming from people don’t start with a letter at least not in the UK, I am not sure about the rest of the world. 4-5-6 allegedly means the jab was Pfizer.
There was and is no deadly virus. It’s a deadly agenda. Crimes against humanity carry the death penalty. Iam aware that SPACE FORCE is tracking all culprits of this agenda against the people in every country. The military will initiate the appropriate penalty. They cannot run or hide.
Rest uneasy all you who think you’ll escape the punishment….YOU WONT!
Knock, knock, knock Hello, we’re here from the Government.. We’re here to help.
Hello….. Open up. It’s time for your COIVID booster.
We can see you in there laying on the floor. Hello, open up……..
[…] The UK government’s covid interventions were followed by spikes in mortality…Institute for Government…published an infographic in December 2022. “I was hoping to see their follow-up, showing what a splendid job they had done in terms of actual mortality reduction,” Joel Smalley writes. However, it appears this is not the case. So, Smalley did his own. Here is how the Government’s covid policy affected native men and women of England and Wales. […]
[…] The UK government’s covid interventions were followed by spikes in mortality…Institute for Government…published an infographic in December 2022. “I was hoping to see their follow-up, showing what a splendid job they had done in terms of actual mortality reduction,” Joel Smalley writes. However, it appears this is not the case. So, Smalley did his own. Here is how the Government’s covid policy affected native men and women of England and Wales. […]