Breaking News

A legal brief filed in New Mexico describes the dangerous impacts of smart meters on human health and wildlife

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


A legal brief has been filed with the New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission to oppose plans to roll out smart meters in the state.  It details comments from the public regarding the impact on their health from the radiofrequency (“RF”) radiation emitted by the devices.

Not only does the brief state that the dangerous impacts on human health have been overlooked, but also the deadly impacts on wildlife.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Smart meters – sometimes referred to as advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) are digital devices that measure and record electricity, gas or water consumption in real-time and relay the information to utility companies, according to IBM. In addition to potentially harming health, many say the meters present privacy and cybersecurity risks.

New Mexico continues to be one of the few American states without smart meters.  However, the Public Service Company of New Mexico (“PNM”) has applied to the New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission to approve a “grid modernisation” plan, which includes a smart meter rollout.   

PNM has tried three times to get regulatory approval to put smart meters in the state, according to New Mexicans for Utility Safety, a public advocacy group that “has successfully opposed smart meters in the state of New Mexico for health and environmental reasons since 2016.”

After it filed its third application on 3 October 2022, the Commission asked PNM to provide a cost-benefit analysis for its proposed grid modernisation investment.

In April, the commission held a public comment hearing about the case and the cost-benefit analysis.  However, a week before the hearing the commission said in a press release that comments made during the hearing “will not be considered as evidence in this proceeding.”

New Mexicans for Utility Safety filed a legal brief earlier this month urging the Commission to deny PNM’s application.

“Public comments should be considered in evaluating PNM’s Cost-Benefit Analysis,” the group said.  And alleged that “hundreds” of public comments testifying to smart meters’ dangerous impacts on human health and wildlife went overlooked in the case before the state’s regulatory commission.

The group also argued that costs to human health and the environment should be included in the cost-benefit analysis.

PNM has ignored scientific studies and evidence of “severe health effects,” the group said. Additionally, the state’s hearing examiner ruled that evidence relating to health and the environment was “irrelevant” to the case, the group added.

Many of the comments submitted during the hearing came from people who had smart meters installed in their homes and then sought to live somewhere without a smart meter – like New Mexico – because they believed the RF radiation emitted by the device was affecting their health.

New Mexicans for Utility Safety’s legal brief included this comment from Elizabeth Foley Walsh:

Deirdre Novella believes she was severely affected by smart meters. “They were installed at my job as a hair stylist,” she said, “and within a few months I had massive radiation poisoning symptoms.”

“My hair was falling out and I was diagnosed with leukaemia… New Mexico is a safe haven for me, so I think smart meters should be banned,” Novella added.

Other commentators noted how they no longer saw wildlife – including bees, birds and frogs – after a smart meter was installed on their home.

You can read the public comments as noted in the legal brief HERE, beginning on page 10.

The above is paraphrased from the article ‘State Ignored ‘Hundreds’ of Public Comments Alleging Smart Meters Harm Health, Group Says’ published by The Defender.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

1 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ron
ron

There are no actual figures quoted only shock doom and gloom stuff. What is the RF output level of a smart meter?
compared with a wireless WiFi router in most homes along with laptops on your lap? As power output is proportional to the square of the distance meaning every 3 feet it becomes a quarter of the power so a laptop will give you a much higher level of wireless radiation than a smart meter a distance away outside the house!

Jacqui Purcell
Jacqui Purcell
1 year ago

A friend of mine died after receiving blasts of a smart meter from the flat behind her bedroom. She died from cancer and was not that old! I wonder if that person who wrote in the article above about dizziness and headaches if she has a wireless router and dect phones? I can’t have any of those things and certainly never a smart meter. They are lethal. People have no idea about anything! I’ve stopped companies sending me ads for smart meters.

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  Jacqui Purcell
1 year ago

I junked free internet because the wifi router made me feel ill within 3 days.

The way those who set the safe levels trick you is they use an average measurement over time but in fact they can shorten the time base and spike the energy level.

The rpblem in New Mexico is if this is done in real time measuring then they are having to put maybe thousands of signals through in a fixed time period.

One meter alone the average will be fine but they have to shorten the time base to monitor all these signals.

The average energy level is bullsh!t … we need safe maximum energy peaks.

I suggest you all get a Trifield meter and start monitoring your environment.

Anonymous
Anonymous
Reply to  Mark Deacon
1 year ago

That’s a great idea for the Trifield. What model do you have?

The Islander
The Islander
Reply to  Anonymous
1 year ago

I don’t know about Mark, but I have model TF2.

Rebecca E Denhoff
Rebecca E Denhoff
1 year ago

Dominion Energy, culprit of killing so many whales with their offshore wind turbines (an article about which you published a couple of months back), is my energy provider. I had technicians trying to install smart meters on my home and farm buildings. Since I stay at home all the time, I caught them and forbade them to proceed. The company put the old analog meters back in, but said they might charge me for them in the future as meter readers have to come every month to physically read them. That hasn’t occurred yet. See if your energy company has an opt out program, you have to directly intervene and request formally if they have one.

John
John
1 year ago

I know 5G effects me. That burns my faces hands when my phone company was testing it.

vivie
vivie
1 year ago

Electric co called one day saying we need to make appt to have the Smart Meter put in. I said NO. I do not want a Smart Meter. they then said we would be charged more $$ each month if we refused. I still said NO…that was one year ago. NO charges were made on our bill. Even the meter person said she did not have a smart meter. Go figure. Pay attention dear ones.

Joy N.
Joy N.
1 year ago

Thanks for the information..
🙏🙏
The Bible prophesied 7-year Tribulation is at humanity’s doorstep & the time to escape is very short. To read more, pls visit https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/

Larry Pierson
Larry Pierson
1 year ago

RF is easy to block once one knows what they are doing, but this is something that residents shouldn’t have to worry about.Metal foil, wire screening, RF wallpaper and even conductive paint are all effective provided they are tied to an earth ground in the vicinity of where they are established.

RF meters were placed on our house years ago, but fortunately for us the meter is at least 20 feet from our bedroom window and close to thirty feet from where we are in it when we sleep.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] Mexico, one of the few states without smart meters, is on the brink of introducing the invasive technology across the state. A legal brief has been filed with the New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission, voicing opposition […]

Sicasevilis
Sicasevilis
1 year ago

PNM, new mexico has been installing smart meters for 11 years(maybe longer).
the work is outsourced to a corporate etity that trains and hiees and maintains 1099 independent contractors…
this argument is predetermined obsoleteness as the public had no choice nor notification- unless the property owners were to notice during the install ar after…

trackback
Anonymous
1 year ago

[…] 25 Ιουνίου, 2024 | Rhoda Wilson | Διαβάστε το εδώ […]