|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The United Kingdom has been increasing its crackdown on free speech, using recent riots to justify arresting people with “extremist ideologies” and views considered harmful or hateful.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has expressed a commitment to addressing online hatred and extremism, particularly what she calls extreme misogyny.
There have been numerous examples of people being arrested for expressing their opinions, which is raising concerns about the decline of free speech in the UK.
Ireland’s new proposed Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) law has also sparked fears about further restrictions on free expression in the UK’s neighbour.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
“It’s Not OK Any More”: The United Kingdom Cracks Down on Free Speech
By Jonathan Turley, 22 August 2024
The crackdown on free speech continues in the United Kingdom as officials use recent rioting to justify a roundup of citizens who they view as “pushing harmful and hateful beliefs.” The government is ramping up arrests of those with “extremist ideologies” in the latest wave of arrests. The crackdown includes those accused of misogynist views.
In my book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I discuss how difficult it is to get a free people to give up freedoms. They have to be afraid, very afraid. For that reason, governments tend to attack free speech during periods of public anger or fear.
That pattern is playing out, yet again, in the United Kingdom. The recent anti-immigration riots have given officials a renewed opportunity to use anti-free speech laws to target those with opposing views.
For years, I have been writing about the decline of free speech in the United Kingdom and the steady stream of arrests. A man was convicted for sending a tweet while drunk referring to dead soldiers. Another was arrested for an anti-police t-shirt. Another was arrested for calling the Irish boyfriend of his ex-girlfriend a “leprechaun.” Yet another was arrested for singing “Kung Fu Fighting.” A teenager was arrested for protesting outside of a Scientology centre with a sign calling the religion a “cult.” Last year, Nicholas Brock, 52, was convicted of a thought crime in Maidenhead, Berkshire. The neo-Nazi was given a four-year sentence for what the court called his “toxic ideology” based on the contents of the home he shared with his mother in Maidenhead, Berkshire.
While most of us find Brock’s views repellent and hateful, they were confined to his head and his room. Yet, Judge Peter Lodder QC dismissed free speech or free thought concerns with a truly Orwellian statement: “I do not sentence you for your political views, but the extremity of those views informs the assessment of dangerousness.”
Lodder lambasted Brock for holding Nazi and other hateful values:
“[i]t is clear that you are a right-wing extremist, your enthusiasm for this repulsive and toxic ideology is demonstrated by the graphic and racist iconography which you have studied and appeared to share with others …”
Even though Lodder agreed that the defendant was older, had limited mobility, and “there was no evidence of disseminating to others,” he still sent him to prison for holding extremist views.
After the sentencing Detective Chief Superintendent Kath Barnes, Head of Counter Terrorism Policing South East (“CTPSE”), warned others that he was going to prison because he “showed a clear right-wing ideology with the evidence seized from his possessions during the investigation … We are committed to tackling all forms of toxic ideology which has the potential to threaten public safety and security.”
“Toxic ideology” also appears to be the target of Ireland’s proposed Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) law. It covers the possession of material deemed hateful. The law is a free speech nightmare. The law makes it a crime to possess “harmful material” as well as “condoning, denying or grossly trivialising genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace.” The law expressly states the intent to combat “forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.”
The Brock case proved, as feared, a harbinger of what was to come. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has vowed to crack down on people “pushing harmful and hateful beliefs.” That includes what she calls extreme misogyny.
Cooper said that the problem revealed by the recent protests was “gaps in the current system” and stressed that “it’s not OK any more to ignore the massive growing threat caused by online hatred towards women and for us to ignore it because we’re worried about the line, rather than making sure the line is in the right place as we would do with any other extremist ideology.”
She added: “For too long governments have failed to address the rise in extremism, both online and on our streets, and we’ve seen the number of young people radicalised online grow. Hateful incitement of all kinds fractures and frays the very fabric of our communities and our democracy.”
For free speech advocates, it is chilling to hear UK officials state that they have been too lax on free speech in the past and must now take censorship and arrests more aggressively.
The United Kingdom has a myriad of laws criminalising speech with vague terms allowing for arbitrary enforcement. For example, the Public Order Act 1986 prohibits any expressions of racial hatred, defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group’s colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.
Section 18 of the Act specifically includes any speech that is “threatening, abusive, or insulting.” An arrest does not have to be based on a showing of intent to “stir up racial hatred,” but can merely be based on a charge that “having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.”
For those Americans who have remained silent as this anti-free speech movement grows, you need only to look to the United Kingdom to see what this movement means for our “indispensable right.” That wave has now reached our shores and it will require each one of us to defend a right that defines us all.
About the Author
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of the book ‘The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage’.
Featured image: Yvette Cooper
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Hate speech != Speech that you hate.
But that is exactly the way it is going.
One of the Four Freedoms in this country is “Freedom of Speech!” I have never heard such rubbish that is happening these days. Are we turning into a fascist country with rules that are unable to express the truth? These people who decide what to ban perhaps need to look at their own inner problems and stop projecting into their mirror!
Firstly, “United Kingdom/UK” is a Corporate entity masquerading as a Government.
Secondly, unless a man or woman has committed an actual crime, the only “persons” this Corporation can target, are those that have claimed to be a “UK Citizen”.
This applies also to those that have claimed to be a “British Citizen”.
As the Maxim of Law states: Ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the Law.
If people don’t understand the language used to trap them, the fault is theirs.
That’s BS. We have NO obligation to learn their rules.
Pleb knee is an apt acronym.
Are all those forbidden words listed somewhere?
If not, there can´t be law to not use them.
If they are, where is that very thick book?
And school must teach all words to children which they can not use.
Sounds like a big problem…
attempting to control others in every wy ought to lead to revolution. but the sheeple are so afraid they sit and twiddle their thumbs.
I think it strange when Yvette Cooper uses a different name to her husband.
It’s another con they use to get votes.
https://www.inyourarea.co.uk/news/drivers-over-60-could-face-a-compulsory-test-in-latest-rule-changes?IYA-mail=fa4a6c3d-f377-4f6f-ae37-e5ad8d4fe6ad
Maybe their not really married
Big news! Yvette Cooper is going to ban Islam in the U.K. She said it’s a misogynist religion, anti-feministic and homophobic.
Ah um no. They are in the second tier. Policemen show the knee.
I cannot believe such tripe Yvette Cooper needs a change of job. ! As I said in an earlier comment there are four Freedoms in this country and two are Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion! She cannot ban anything connected to these. What is her problem?
No such word as ” homophobic”, show’s she’s not to intelligent 🙄
Hurty words!
What everyone is missing in this discussion is that hate is a God given right and that is one
of each human’s primary defenses against aggression and cultural genocide.
Hate and Zenophobia are genetically derived tools of self, family, community and racial defense and preservation.
Stalking and Murder are the Hallmarks of Genocide, not the minor collaterals of Multiculturalism.
“Hate is a God given right”, so VERY true!
Do not I HATE them, O LORD, that hate thee?
Psalm 139:21.
Hi Islander,
What do you make of this.
https://davidnixon.substack.com/p/nicotine-does-not-destroy-nanotech?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-168b48fd-6397-47a2-a8d1-b1b74c0ad062
Is the u
Is the Uk going communist police state. Sure looks like it.
Never heard of the woman untill now . I left Facebook years ago and twitter same .the way they can id you is they want your phone number .or they can find your IP address.use a VPN ,and don’t bother with these sites!. 🙂👍
Youths oppress them and women rule over them – Isaiah 3:12 The Brits are a bunch of punks. We used to say, “The sun never sets on the British Empire” Today England is ruled by foreigners and their lackeys.
But what if you don’t belive in binary genders?!!!
Then how could you possibly be found “guilty” of misogyny?
It works both ways guys, you hit us with illogical and undefined terms, we can then use identity politics to come back your way, with interest!