Breaking News

What Doctors won’t tell you about chemotherapy

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


It’s obvious the so-called ‘War on Cancer’ has failed. The use of chemotherapy in cancer treatment is limited in its effectiveness and kills many.

Why is it still used? The cancer industry focuses on profit over effective treatments.

Take aspirin for example. At low doses, aspirin helps cancer patients. Studies involving one million patients with 18 different cancers showed aspirin reduced mortality by 21%.  Sadly, many oncologists and cancer charities are unduly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and see no value in persuading patients to take aspirin.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


By Dr. Vernon Coleman

A decade ago doctors agreed that one in three people would get cancer. Today, the same doctors tell us that one in two people will get cancer.

There, in that simple statistic, is all the proof you need that the so-called ‘War on Cancer’ is a total failure. The huge multi-billion dollar cancer industry has helped make things worse not better.

Seventeen types of cancer are much commoner among young people than they used to be.

And it isn’t difficult to see why the cancer industry is a failure.

The industry (by which I mean the comfortable, rich conspiracy of drug companies, cancer charities and the medical establishment – all of which have got very rich through their failure) has failed because it has put most of its effort into a form of treatment, chemotherapy, which almost certainly kills more people than it saves, and little or no effort into other treatments or into education and prevention. The cancer industry now spends hundreds of billions a year but if it were judged by results it would be closed down tomorrow.

No medical or nursing journal will dare review my new book. No mainstream publication will dare discuss the contents. No one will dare interview me. The reviews will consist largely of one star reviews on Amazon which are unaccompanied by any actual reviews – and which will probably be posted by bots working for the cancer industry.

But, for example, my book contains evidence, published in JAMA Oncology, which showed that terminally ill cancer patients were worse off if they had chemotherapy.

And studies show that the death rate among cancer patients accelerates when patients in poor health are given chemotherapy. The American Society of Clinical Oncologists has said that chemotherapy should be restricted to relatively healthy patients who can withstand the toxic effects.

The uplift in survival after chemotherapy can be as low as 2.5% and may go up to 5%. But chemotherapy kills many of those brave souls who endure their chemotherapy treatment.

These aren’t my figures. You can find them in the literature. Just hunt around through the barrage of pro-chemotherapy propaganda, if you don’t want to read my book. And yet oncologists push chemotherapy (sometimes to the point of compulsion) and journalists and others sneer at patients who do their own research, say “no” and choose other types of therapy.

Many journalists, and not a few doctors, believe the rhetoric that chemotherapy is safe. Why then, are doctors and nurses issued with comprehensive crisis procedures which must be followed if chemotherapy drugs are spilt? If the stuff is dangerous when spilt on the floor what the hell is it doing inside someone’s body?

The problem is that the cell-destroying properties of chemotherapy can be lethal. It isn’t just cancer cells which die. It is widely assumed by journalists that the only problem is hair loss. Oh, if only that were true. Chemotherapy drugs can damage the bone marrow, the central nervous system, the digestive system, the kidneys and the bladder. Osteoporosis and hormone changes can occur. Heart damage is so common, and so serious, that many patients being treated with chemotherapy die of heart problems. These deaths are not usually listed as being a result of the chemotherapy. And chemotherapy can damage the immune system – just what you don’t want if you are fighting cancer.

In one medical journal, I found this: “the upfront use of chemotherapy does not seem to influence the overall outcome of the disease.”

The Academy of Royal Medical Colleges criticised chemotherapy advocates for raising false hopes and doing more harm than good. You’ll be surprise to hear that someone from the cancer industry disagreed.

Oh, and in case you are wondering, preventive chemotherapy is quite a different beast to the sort of chemotherapy which is routinely recommended for cancer patients.

Why has the war on cancer been such a failure?

Well, the cancer industry refuses to look at possible explanations for the explosion in cancer cases. Vaccination rates have risen as cancer deaths have risen but it is considered heresy to suggest that vaccination may cause disease – despite vaccination programmes being inadequately untested. There is no little irony in the fact that governments everywhere quietly pay out billions to those damaged by vaccines but the BBC refuses to interview anyone who questions the safety of vaccination programmes.

There is a simple, cheap, easily available drug available which can help cancer patients when taken in a very low dose. It is called aspirin.

In studies involving one million patients with 18 different cancers, about a quarter of the patients took 75mg of aspirin a day. Analysis showed a reduction of 21% in mortality among the patients who had taken the small dose of aspirin. Doctors are, however, still largely reluctant to recommend that people take prophylactic aspirin – despite its proven anti-inflammatory effect and its usefulness in protecting cancer patients and patients liable to heart attacks. A small daily dose of aspirin is extraordinarily cheap and seems to work well but there is virtually no profit in selling plain, common or garden-soluble aspirin and so drug companies are uninterested. The medical establishment always does what it is told to do by the pharmaceutical industry.

In November 2023, the British Medical Journal published an article entitled `Aspirin and cancer treatment: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evidence: for and against’. The authors (there were ten of them) concluded: “… given the relative safety and the favourable effects of aspirin, its use in cancer seems justified, and ethical implications of this imply that cancer patients should be informed of the present evidence and encouraged to raise the topic with their health care team.”

I wonder how many GPs or oncology departments bothered to get in touch with their cancer patients to tell them this good news? None would be my guess.

In November 2022, an article from the Royal Society in London concluded: “We believe that the series of studies we have reported – and in particular the evidence on the relative safety of aspirin – have provided evidence that is sufficient to justify the recommendation of aspirin to patients with cancer. We see our task now to be persuading oncologists to examine the evidence.”

Sadly, this is likely to be an uphill battle since many oncologists are unduly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, which sees no value in persuading patients to take aspirin (which is, of course, a generic product available very cheaply). And, remember, large charities are often very closely linked to drug companies.

There are many other things that oncologists should be looking at. The principle of marginal gains (so successful in sport) should be applied to cancer. Results of biopsies and scans could and should be available in minutes rather than weeks or months. (One woman died after waiting two years for results.) There is a commonly available drink (coffee) which seems to help some cancer patients. Diet is massively important – with dairy produce apparently having a powerful impact on the survival rate of patients with breast cancer. And so it goes on.

I’m not offering magical solutions. I’m not advocating some weird, untested, alternative therapy.

But I do believe that we need to ask questions about how we treat cancer and, in particular, about the use of chemotherapy. Sadly, I suspect I’ll be alone in this. The global medical establishment, and the remainder of the cancer industry, have become very accomplished at crushing those who ask difficult questions.

Dr Vernon Coleman’s new book `What doctors won’t tell you about chemotherapy’ is now available. Just CLICK HERE.

About the Author

Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books.  He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read.

There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary Ann Dowrick
Mary Ann Dowrick
10 months ago

Canadian Doctor Makis writes about studies that have used ivermectin in combination with fenbendazole.

chrisirish67
chrisirish67
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
10 months ago

if you have worms huh?

Rachel
Rachel
Reply to  chrisirish67
10 months ago

We all have parasites. Do a massive detox, see
contrabandcures.com

Rachel
Rachel
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
10 months ago

Yup. Some believe that parasites fuel or cause cancer, so anti-parasitics
are sensible. MOST OF US HAVE PARASITES, detox.

chrisirish67
chrisirish67
10 months ago

CHEMO kills! ITS WHAT ITS DESIGNED TO DO.

David Robert Mackenzie
David Robert Mackenzie
10 months ago

doctors in the usa apparently profit from the chemo drugs , and im guessing there will be similar incentives in most other countries .

jsinton
jsinton
10 months ago

On the contrary. The “War on Cancer” has been a resounding success. It was brilliant to create the diseases and then hold out hope to cure the incurable diseases. You get to soak the suckers coming and going. Meanwhile, you tag everyone with a MAC address and connect them to the mainframe. Must be AI planning all this.

Rachel
Rachel
Reply to  jsinton
10 months ago

YES, a success, but in a demonic way. Fear creates sheep.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

A Person
A Person
10 months ago

There’s an entertaining documentary on the treatment of cancer with vitamin B17 (aka laetrile/amygdalin), which comes from the seeds of fruit like apricots and apples, called “Second Opinion: Laetrile At Sloan-Kettering” (can buy at Amaz0n)Table 2 shows that repeated intraperitoneal injections of. 1000 mg/kg/day of Amygdalin for 2 to 15 weeks failed to destroy the spontaneous cancer in mice. However, it caused an inhibition in about 50 percent of the tumors. It also shows Amygdalin had a strong inhibitory effect on the development of new tumours and on long metastases (11% against 89%) in mice. The general health and appearance of the Amygdalin-treated animals with tumours was much better than that of the controls.” (34 mins in)

“… the starting material for the chemical synthesis of aspirin is benzene, derived from petroleum” – McGill University (cue someone to negate that by saying they don’t trust them…) but that’s another path one could choose to follow.

Rachel
Rachel
Reply to  A Person
10 months ago

Agreed. However the FDA wants to stop information like that.
You must use the BITTER apricot seeds/pits, not the sweet.
It has cyanide in it, so I have read consuming maybe 10 soaked
seeds a day is okay.

God gives us every herb and seed, for us it shall be for food/meat..
We have no need for pharma drugs, pricey poisons with side effects.

Iris
Iris
10 months ago

Ozone therapy cures infections and diseases. Nikola Tesla knew its healing potency and created the first ozone generator.

Rachel
Rachel
10 months ago

Thank you. CANCER IS A PROFITABLE BUSINE$$.
Many humans go bankrupt paying for medical poisons that
doctors convince them will “cure” their problem. The Doctors are
not stupid, they see patients who die from their treatments, and
know of others who did not use them and got better. Follow the $$.
Many caring doctors have been murdered for coming up with cancer
cures that work. Some died in the past year in a plane crash.

As far as I know, chemo is MUSTARD GAS, the same substance
used to kill many humans in gas chambers. Who in their rght
mind would pollute their body with this that kills their immune system?.

Use nutrition, forgiveness, self awareness, and large lifestyle
improvements. Do you have anger? figure out where it comes from
and deal with it, stop suppressing it. Let it flow to help you get rid of it.
But not for long, don’t marinate in it. Go out in nature, meditate,
exercise and learn about life.

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Vernon Coleman, Expose News) Pred desiatimi rokmi sa lekári zhodli, že každý tretí človek na svete dostane rakovinu. Dnes […]

Jan
Jan
10 months ago

The fear of cancer is further and further increased. The more it is checked for cancer, the more cancer patients there are. They don’t do those checks for nothing, that’s to get more patients. My father was in perfect health and thought it was good to have his health checked every year because he was getting older. During the check-up they found something “raars” in his intestines. For check-ups to the hospital and yes: colon cancer (he felt like a chicken) Immediately at the chemo, so he went from perfectly healthy to vomiting. My father was quite stubborn (which I think is a positive trait) and said: I hooded with that chemo, that only makes me sick. A whole club of doctors was dragged in to persuade my father to continue chemo. At some point, he just didn’t go to the hospital. He said, “If I get sick, I’d rather be home. And what happened? When the chemo had worn off, he felt like chicken again and never suffered from anything until he died 10 years later at the age of 85 in his sleep. Stay away from doctors and hospitals and if you really have to ask for a second opinion. And above all, don’t let you scare!

Maurice
Maurice
10 months ago

Re “the so-called ‘War on Cancer’ is a total failure”

Yes. And even worse because the official mainstream “war on cancer” has been an unofficial “war” on the unsuspecting public: to keep them misinformed and misguided about the real truth of this “war.” The latest program/”promise” is an extension or reincarnation of the enduring deep racket.

This PHONY official “war” was never meant to be won but to be CONTINUED (preferably endlessly, at least for decades) so that the criminal BIG allopathic medical business (the medical mafia) built around it makes insane profits and defrauds the general naive/foolish public, which they’ve been doing successfully … so “THEY ARE winning THEIR war against the general forever-naive/forever-foolish public”..

The orthodox cancer establishment has been saying a cure for cancer “is just around the corner” and “we’re winning the war on cancer” for decades. It’s almost all hype and lies (read Dr. Guy Faguet’s ‘War on cancer,” Dr. Sam Epstein’s work, or Clifton Leaf’s book, or Dr. Siefried’s work on this bogus ‘war’, etc). The criminal medical establishment deliberate and falsely self-servingly claims and distorts a ‘win’ in the bogus ‘war on cancer’ when the only truly notably win is a reduction in lung cancer mortality due to a huge reduction in smoking (eg ca. 40% reduction of the overall cancer death rate in men between 1990-2006 was because of a large reduction in cigarette smoking [https://tinyurl.com/ypk4ccyj]), which has NOTHING to do with their cancer treatments. Lying is their mode of operation.

Since the war on cancer began orthodox medicine hasn’t progressed in their basic highly profitable therapies: it still uses primarily  and almost exclusively highly toxic, deadly things like radiation, chemo, surgery, and drugs that have killed millions of people instead of the disease.

As long as the official “war on cancer” is a HUGE BUSINESS based on expensive TREATMENTS (INTERVENTIONS) of a disease instead of its PREVENTION, logically, they will never find a cure for cancer. The moonshot-war on cancer inventions, too, includes industry-profitable gene therapies of cancer treatment that are right in line with the erroneous working model of mechanistic reductionism of allopathic medicine.

The lucrative game of the medical business is to endlessly “look for” a cure but not “find” a cure. Practically all resources in the phony ‘war on cancer’ are poured into TREATMENT  of cancer but almost none in the PREVENTION of the disease. Eg, Heidi Williams, the director of science policy at the Institute for Progress, explained that from the time the “War on Cancer” was announced, in 1971, until 2015, only six drugs were approved to prevent any cancer. From 1973 to 2011, nearly 30,000 trials were run for drugs that treated recurrent or metastatic cancer, compared with fewer than 600 for cancer prevention.

It’s IRREFUTABLE PROOF POSITIVE that BIG MONEY and a TOTAL LACK OF ETHICS rule the official medical establishment.

It’s just like with any bogus official “war” (‘war on drugs’, ‘war on terrorism’, ‘war on covid’ etc) — it’s not about winning these wars but to primarily prolong them because behind any of these fraudulent “war” rackets of the criminal establishment is a Big Business, such as the massive cancer industry.  The very profitable TREATMENT focus of conventional medicine, instead of a PREVENTION focus which these official medical quacks (or rather crooks) can hardly make any money off, is a major reason why today 1 of 2 men and 1 in 3 women can expect a cancer diagnosis at some point in their lifetimes (https://tinyurl.com/ypk4ccyj) yet that rate was multiple times lower 5 decades ago when the phony ‘war on cancer’ began (1 in about 16) and the current much higher rate cannot at all be attributed solely to an aging population. And 5 decades ago when this bogus war began cancer was the second leading cause of death and 50 years later it is STILL the second leading cause of death in the country this “war” was declared in (https://tinyurl.com/ypk4ccyj). These facts alone prove we are NOT winning the war on cancer.

At the same time, this same orthodox cancer cartel has been suppressing and squashing a number of very effective and beneficial alternative cancer approaches. You probably guessed why: effective, safe, inexpensive cancer therapies are cutting into the  astronomical  profits of the medical mafia’s lucrative treatments. That longstanding decadent activity is part of the fraud of the war on cancer.

If the public were to scrutinize what the medical industry and its government pawns are telling them about the ‘war on cancer’ instead of blindly believing what they’re saying, they’d find that the cancer industry and the cancer charities have been dismissing, ignoring, and obfuscating the true causes of cancer while mostly putting the blame for cancer on the individual, denying or dismissing the serious harms from orthodox cancer treatments and chemical toxicants, and resorting to deceptive cancer statistics to “educate” (think: mislead) the public that their way of treatment is actually successful — read this well referenced scholarly article’s (“A Mammogram Letter The British Medical Journal Censored”) afterword on the war on cancer at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/mammogram.html (scroll down to the afterword that addresses the fraudulent ‘war on cancer’).

What the medical establishment “informs” the public about is about as truthful as what the political establishment keeps telling them. Not to forget, the corporate media (the mainstream fake news media) is a willing tool to spread these distortions, lies, and the scam of the war on cancer.

Does anyone really think it’s a coincidence that double Nobel laureate Linus Pauling called the ‘war on cancer’ a fraud? If you look closer you’ll come to the same conclusion. But…politics and self-serving interests of the conventional medical cartel, and their allied corporate media, keep the real truth far away from the public at large. Or people’s own denial of, or indifference to, the real truth.