Breaking News

When a Vegetarian Sausage Beats an MRI Scanner

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


Modern doctors rely far too much on technology; they rely too much upon equipment which is often faulty, frequently badly calibrated and more often than not downright misleading.

Today’s doctors have lost the skill that was most valued among doctors a generation ago: the skill to make diagnoses.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


By Dr. Vernon Coleman

The following essay is taken from the book `Why and how doctors kill more people than cancer’ by Vernon Coleman.

In the dark old days of medicine, objective judgements were made based on a skilful and knowledgeable interpretation and assessment of a mixture of symptoms and signs. Doctors made diagnoses relying on their own senses, rather than bowing to extremely fallible machines. They relied on experience, instinct and intuition. They used X-rays and laboratory tests to help them confirm their diagnoses.

Today, diagnostic skills are disappearing and doctors are coming to rely almost entirely on laboratory tests and X-ray pictures. Doctors don’t dare make diagnoses unless they can provide bits of paper from a laboratory to substantiate their conclusion. Since laboratory tests and investigations are woefully inaccurate, and often misleading, the result is that many patients are wrongly diagnosed (and exposed to unnecessary treatments), many serious problems are missed completely and doctors are making more mistakes than ever.

A growing majority of doctors now do little more than interpret laboratory results; they know that ordering tests is easier than thinking and that they are not likely to be sued if they have bits of paper to support their diagnoses. Doctors have become little more than simple computers: ordering tests and making decisions on the basis of the results obtained. When my wife was taken ill with neurological problems she saw several doctors before anyone thought to ask her about her diet. Numerous tests were performed but no one bothered to ask her what sort of foods she ate. And yet diet is a vital factor in the development of illness.

Modern doctors rely far too much on technology – and far too little on building up any diagnostic skills of their own. Old-fashioned doctors used to rely on what their patients told them and on what their eyes, ears, noses and fingertips told them. Most important of all, perhaps, was the sixth sense that doctors used to acquire through years of clinical experience. Modern doctors rely too much upon equipment which is often faulty, frequently badly calibrated and more often than not downright misleading.

Sadly, doctors seem surprisingly unaware that the high-technology alternatives to genuine diagnostic skills are dangerously fallible; they do not seem to know that if you do enough tests you will always find an abnormality. Then the abnormality (which may be entirely harmless) will have to be further investigated and probably treated. Tests are often inaccurate and frequently misleading. They lead to many mistaken diagnoses. (There is a chapter in my book ‘Coleman’s Laws’ dealing with the problems created by misleading tests and investigations.)

Many doctors seem quite unable, or unwilling, to reach a diagnosis unless the diagnosis is more or less written out on a form that has been printed by a computer. The best diagnostician I ever knew was not a hospital consultant but a GP. He was old and frail when I knew him. He could make diagnoses more accurately than any doctor relying on technology. His secret was simple: he listened to patients and considered their responses; he looked at them and he noticed things. It wasn’t complicated.

Today’s doctors have lost the skill that was most valued among doctors a generation ago: the skill to make diagnoses. (Treating patients who have been diagnosed is, by comparison, straightforward and simple enough. Any fool can open a textbook, look up a disease, and find out how to treat it.) Doctors don’t seem to have realised that you don’t need six years of medical school to order a pile of laboratory tests. And you don’t need six years of training to “read” the results. If doctors are going to continue to rely exclusively on test results when making diagnoses then medical training could be cut down to a weekend.

The X-rays, blood tests and other investigations that doctors order are not just sometimes lethal but are frequently unnecessary. Many tests are wildly inaccurate and dangerously misleading as well. Test results are often wrong. It is not unusual to obtain 30% false negatives or false positives. This means that if a doctor performs ten tests, then the chances are that three of them will be wrong and quite misleading.

Here are just some of the frightening facts that I can reveal about medical investigations:

1. X-rays are the third biggest cause of cancer (after eating meat and smoking). Many X-rays are done quite unnecessarily – just as a “routine.” In Britain, around 20,000 people a year get cancer from medical and dental X-rays. X-rays given to pregnant women during the 1950s and 1960s are responsible for between 5% and 10% of all childhood cancers. Children who develop leukaemia – and other cancers – may have been made ill because their mothers had X-rays while they were pregnant.

2. Tests often wrongly show up disease in healthy individuals. Those patients are then subjected to surgery and drug therapy which they do not need.

3. Tests – which patients and doctors seem to trust too much – often wrongly say that a patient is healthy.

4. About two-thirds of all medical tests are worthless and of no help to the patient.

5. Patients routinely admitted to hospital are often subjected to 20 or so blood, urine and other tests. When so many tests are done, one or more abnormalities will be found in two-thirds of all healthy individuals. Once an abnormal result has been obtained doctors feel obliged to continue doing tests. The tests they do often produce serious complications. Many patients who think they are ill – and have been told that they need to take drugs for life – are not really ill at all.

6. Unnecessary tests are often done out of habit, for personal research, to provide protection in case of lawsuits or simply to impress other doctors. Doctors frequently order tests because it is quicker and easier to fill in a form than it is to talk and listen or to examine a patient properly.

7. When blood tests are done the results are compared against “normal” values. But the “normal” figures may have been produced decades earlier – by testing a few seemingly healthy doctors and nurses. No one really knows what is “normal.” Your “abnormal” result may be more “normal” than the official “normal” result.

8. Doctors who know that tests can be misleading frequently order expensive, uncomfortable and even hazardous investigations – and then ignore the results.

9. Complicated, expensive and potentially dangerous tests are often ordered when simple, inexpensive and perfectly safe tests would be more appropriate. My wife saw a neurologist who decided that her symptoms might be caused by a tumour affecting the top of her spine. The doctor ordered an MRI scan of her brain and spine. But the disease the doctor had thought possible causes a very specific loss of sensation – including a loss of temperature sensation. I took a frozen vegetarian sausage out of the freezer and performed a simple test myself – using the frozen sausage to check for temperature sensation loss. There were no temperature sensation losses. I concluded that the diagnosis was wrong and we cooked the sausage and ate it. Four days later my wife went for the MRI scan as arranged. The scan supported the evidence provided by the cold vegetarian sausage and showed that there was no lesion in my wife’s spine. The sausage test, just as reliable as the scan, took a fraction of the time to do and cost about £10,000 less. The results were available instantly.

Note: The above essay is taken from `Why and how doctors kill more people than cancer’ by Vernon Coleman. The book is available from the bookshop on his website.

About the Author

Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books.  He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read.

There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lindsay
Lindsay
7 months ago

I had my first and only pregnancy aged 41, registered with a GP @ almost 5 months, and refused all but one scan out of the dozens offered. I also decided to have one blood test to see what was going on in my blood after getting 5 of the childhood illnesses decades earlier. I know blood alone isn’t accurate but they looked for antibodies for german measles, measles, and I think whooping cough and apparently there were a fair few still swimming around in me!

DRK
DRK
Reply to  Lindsay
7 months ago

Evidence is mounting that ultrasound scans are not benign to developing fetuses.

‘The Precautionary Principle’ warns that we should assume that ANYTHING that was not a part of the natural environment of humans is potentially harmful and should be avoided, until proven safe.

Good for you for being appropriately cautious.

Ellie Car
Ellie Car
7 months ago

I can vouch for wrong diagnosis. I was diagnosed with copd 15 years ago, (yes I was a 20 a day smoker at that time) a few month after the doctor decided to send me for a sleep apena test, although I didn’t have any symptoms and was only 7 stone 6, which came back as positive this I knew was a false diagnosis as I panicked when putting this sleep mask on and took it off after an hour, (around midnight) but the results which I requested to see showed that between 2am and 4am I was snoring, and stopped breathing 7 times, again at 6am, I struggled to breathe? I asked how reliable these tests were and was told 100% as they are monitoring my sleep throughout the night. I then told them I hadn’t actually used it, but they still persisted that I needed to sleep with this machine every night or I could die??? I of course didn’t and now I question my copd as well as I’m 65 now but don’t struggle in anyway to breathe, even going up and down stairs at home throughout the day, I’ve never used or felt any need to use the inhalers they have giving me either, so I don’t trust any tests and question everything they tell me now. I have only took a flu vaccine 4 times over the years and had flu 3 out of these 4 times, with 1 bout seeing me in hospital, so never took them in the past 10 years and never had flu? I did not give in to pressure with the covid vaccine either and never had covid?? Question everything don’t ever settle for what they tell you….

DRK
DRK
Reply to  Ellie Car
7 months ago

Thank you, Ellie, for sharing your experience with an obvious misdiagnosis- and the refusal of medical professionals to actually listen to you. Inexcusable, but all too common.

“Question everything…” Wise words to live by.

Samia
Samia
Reply to  Ellie Car
7 months ago

Thanks for telling us of your experiences. I have a family member who developed “covid” even though she was more than fully inoculated. LOL.

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

George
George
7 months ago

In the USA, MRI’s are a money makers for Doctors, clinics, hospitals, and investors because they are expensive and use a lot of helium. I have had many over the years for various things including a torn shoulder, degenerative disks between C5-C7. Prostate cancer, meniere’s disease, etc. MRIs are rarely shown to the uneducated customer (patient). But some of the doctor comments on viewing them were:
a) I did not see anything there but the x-ray shows…
b) The results of the scan are unremarkable (did not see anything but you will get a bill for the scan).

What customers (patients) do not know is that the MRI machines are usually owned by a group of doctors or investors. The clinics have goals of x number of scans per month. If they do more they probably receive a higher percentage of the cut. Its a business.
The next time a doctor ask me undergo a MRI scan, I am going to ask if it is necessary and what will it show that an X-ray will not?
How does this help with a diagnosis. etc. Doctors hate questions, they are too busy for that and they are required to see x number of customers per day. So all you get is about 5-10 minutes based on load and specialty.

Oh, X-rays are similar to gamma radiation but you are not to know or ask about that either. There is no consensus for a definition distinguishing between X-rays and gamma rays.

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
John 8:32 KJV

Samia
Samia
Reply to  George
7 months ago

They gave me a stupid brain scan because I had vomited a lot and was feeling weak. I had lost a lot of electrolytes esp. sodium, which they then gave me too much of, and I left Urgent Care sicker and weaker than I went in. I am not making this up.

I feel like a fool that I did not think of giving myself some rehydration therapy like you give children when they puke and have diarrhea. Oh well, that’s how we learn, I guess. But why the stupid brain scan? I was told my brain “was OK”. Alrighty…

Bruce Hamilton
Bruce Hamilton
7 months ago

My favorite example of how so-called “normal” test levels are wrong is how Dr. Joel Fuhrman has for years pointed out that “normal” white blood counts are actually high because they reflect the chronic low-level inflammation characteristic of most of the population.

Brad
Brad
7 months ago

Agent Orange is Roundup: GMO Food 2.0 is here, CRISPR–Cas9 Modifies Human Embryos with Unwanted Changes to the Genome

RoundUp vs.Agent Orange: More similar than you think.

https://www.hillandponton.com/weeds-not-worth-killing-with-roundup/

DEPOPULATION was underway long before COVID… they’ve been working to EXTERMINATE HUMANITY for decades!
https://banned.video/watch?id=65f58934a69c2bbb83aa9df2

GMO 2.0: CRISPR and TALENs rapidly changing the food industry, especially in the United States. 

GMO 2.0: What It Is & How It Threatens Our Existence w/ Jeffrey Smith
 https://banned.video/watch?id=65e3fe9765961e3380c179b4 

7 Reasons Why Gene Editing is Dangerous and Unpredictable cancer, bacteria, mutant proteins causing allergenic & toxic proteins. Sloppy splicing causes DNA & chromosomes to shatter causing chromothripsis associated with cancer. 

Mixing genes permanently inserted retroviruses causes insertion damage. 

Mutation from the gene editing process causes massive damage to the genome causing 1000s  of mutations. 

7 Epigenetic inheritance passed on to at least 10 generation
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Au5HO7it9ng
 
CRISPR gene editing in human embryos wreaks chromosomal mayhem

A suite of experiments that use the gene-editing tool CRISPR–Cas9 to modify human embryos have revealed how the process can make large, unwanted changes to the genome at or near the target site.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01906-4?error=cookies_not_supported&code=1d74ca34-74a4-48f0-a96f-e08b5b0f04af

 The Non-GMO Project, says all gene editing approaches are “types of in-vitro nucleic acid techniques” CRISPR and TALENs and forms of genetic engineering are GMOs. 
 “CRISPR and TALENs” are being sold as non-GMO, and that is really misleading,” 
GMO 2.0 raises public awareness, generates political urgency around regulations, and builds global opposition to the release of gene-edited microbes. 

Discover the power to make informed choices about GMOs, & GMO 2.0, and take action to create a better future for patients and the planet.
https://responsibletechnology.org/

DRK
DRK
7 months ago

There is literally no actual evidence that eating meat causes cancer.

These physicians present the evidence:

Dr. Georgia Ede, MD is a Harvard trained physician, who then became a psychiatrist. She digs into the actual science to get to the truth. er article examines the WHO report claiming that red meat causes cancer:
https://www.diagnosisdiet.com/full-article/meat-and-cancer

Dr. Ede’s video presentation – ‘WHO says meat causes cancer?’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDgzgDSInt0

Dr. Alex Petrushevski – ‘Red Meat and Cancer’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up__RB_rgRM

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, PhD, cancer researcher at Boston College,
‘Cancer as a Metabolic Disease’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyB3VI0vwKA&list=PLTQPV3co3kZShkv3cQ-g0JcJG8w_jzsmX

DRK
DRK
Reply to  DRK
7 months ago

Nina Tiecholtz – ‘Vegetable Oils: the Untold Story’
15:45 – Nearly a dozen studies in which animal fats were substituted with seed oils (deceptively labeled & marketed as “vegetable” oil), showed no cardio-vascular or heart disease benefit, but participants experienced dramatically higher rates of cancer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2UnOryQiIY

Samia
Samia
Reply to  DRK
7 months ago

IMO it is not individual elements (from food) which contribute to cancer; it is the overall diet and lifestyle. You have to look at the whole person and their whole life. That includes genetic/family background and tendencies to be found there.

It is not diet IMO which is the main “cause” or driver of ill health; it is more likely doctor-provided treatments and prescriptions including vaccines, of course.

paul
paul
7 months ago

Well I left a Veggie Sausage for the birds and not even the gulls would take it.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  paul
7 months ago

People believe veg/vegan sausages are food because it says so on the label-gulls can’t read so they’re not fooled!

Samia
Samia
Reply to  paul
6 months ago

Not all vegetable sausages are equal. Some actually consist of real food and no unnatural additives, just (maybe) beet juice; also no added vitamins.

mcc
mcc
7 months ago

People these days tend too much to go looking for problems then asking the NHS to investigate them, resulting more often than not in lucrative over the top treatments. when there are often time tested common sense solutions they could do at home. One example; a friend had what was obviously an insect bite (a ring of small red spots) referred it to a GP. The GP’s solution: get the shingles jab !!!!!
I know someone else who did have the shingles jab and, coincidentally or
not ,…a year or two later developed non- hodgkins, took medications for this which had sensitivity to sun as side effect, were in the sun for 10 minutes and burnt badly, developed a melanoma on the face a couple of years later, which needed to be excised, and so on….

mcc
mcc
Reply to  mcc
7 months ago

PS Correction not a melanoma it was a squamous cell carcinoma

Samia
Samia
Reply to  mcc
6 months ago

OK. Thanx for correction.