|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In the last 4 years, Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca have been found guilty of breaching the UK pharmaceutical code of practice in 53 separate offences concerning their covid injections.
In some cases, the pharmaceutical companies were found guilty of promoting vaccines to the public which is unlawful in the UK. Yet it appears no action was taken.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
UsForThem, a UK campaign group for children, tweeted a video yesterday summarising the complaints made to the PMCPA where Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca’s activities relating to the companies’ covid “vaccines” were found to be in breach of the British Pharmaceutical Industry Code of Practice.
The text accompanying USForThem’s video stated, “The litany of serious and persistent offending includes:
- misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines;
- bringing discredit on the pharmaceutical industry;
- improper marketing of their products to children; and
- bribery.”
The video concludes, “Despite a track record of serious and persistent offending, no fines or other penalties have been imposed by the regulator. The UK’s pharma regulatory system is broken.”
The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (“PMCPA”) is the self-regulatory body which administers the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (“ABPI”) Code of Practice for the Pharmaceutical Industry.
The PMCPA is responsible for providing advice, guidance and training on the ABPI Code. It also investigates complaints about pharmaceutical companies’ activities and ensures compliance with the ABPI Code of Practice.
Companies found in breach of the Code are required to pay administrative charges, provide a written undertaking, and may be subject to additional sanctions. One of the sanctions PMCPA can impose is to report a company to the Code of Practice Appeal Board, either because a particular case warrants such or because repeated breaches of the Code raise concerns about the company’s procedures. The Board consists of 10 members, four of which represent pharmaceutical companies.
The PMCPA cannot issue fines but it can suspend or expel a pharmaceutical company from the ABPI, which must be ratified by the ABPI Board. The ABPI is a trade association so expulsion means the company loses the benefits of ABPI membership, such as representation, advocacy, and access to industry events and resources.
The ABPI Code of Practice sets standards for its members for the promotion of medicines to health professionals and other relevant decision-makers in the UK. It includes requirements for the provision of information to patients and the public and outlines guidelines for interactions with patient groups. The code aims to ensure that pharmaceutical companies operate in a responsible, ethical and professional manner.
You can find all the complaints made to the PMCPA HERE. A number of the complaints relate to pharmaceutical companies attempting to advertise or market their products on social media.
Although pharmaceutical companies are allowed to promote medicines to healthcare professionals and other relevant decision-makers, the ABPI Code of Practice prohibits the advertising or promotion of prescription-only medicines to the public according to UK law. Under UK law, vaccines are classified as prescription-only medicines.
The PMCPA website uses Boolean search which allows a combination of words and phrases using the operators AND, OR, and NOT to either narrow, broaden or define search criteria. For example, we wanted to search for instances where Pfizer had failed to maintain high standards relating to its covid injection. So, in the search box we entered: “Pfizer” AND “COVID” AND “high standards.” 38 results were returned across various PMCPA categories: “Completed Cases,” “Advertised Sanctions” and “Code.”
The same case can appear in more than one category. An explanation of what the categories are explains why.
Once evidence from both parties is considered for a complaint and the case has concluded, a case report is published on the PMCPA’s website as a “Completed Case.”
“Advertised Sanctions” refers to companies that have been ruled to be in breach of Clause 2 of the ABPI Code (Upholding Confidence in the Industry), are required to issue a corrective statement or are the subject of a public reprimand. In these cases, the PMCPA advertises brief details of the case in the medical and pharmaceutical press, namely the British Medical Journal and the Nursing Standard.
The “Code” category is either a short explanation of a clause within the APBI Code of Practice or a list of recent complaint cases relating to a particular code.
To give an idea of the type of information a complaint and a case report includes, below is the case summary for one of the results returned from our search, “Pfizer” AND “COVID” AND “high standards,” from the “Completed Case” category.
Our selected case relates to a complaint received from “a contactable member of the public” about Pfizer’s misuse of social media to misleadingly and illegally promote their covid vaccine. Although we have only reproduced the summary, you can find the full report by following the hyperlink contained in the subheading below (emphasis our own).
AUTH/3741/2/23 – Complainant v Pfizer: Promotional use of Twitter
This case concerned a complaint received in February 2023 about a tweet posted by a US employee of Pfizer, and re-tweeted by a senior UK employee in November 2020. The tweet, which was still visible on their Twitter feed, related to a Pfizer and BioNTech press release announcing the conclusion of the Phase 3 Study of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate, which had met all primary efficacy endpoints. The complainant alleged the tweet included relative efficacy rates without any information about absolute efficacy rates and that no safety data or safety information was provided, and therefore that Pfizer had misleadingly and illegally promoted its COVID-19 vaccine.
The Panel ruled a breach of the following Clauses of the 2019 Code:
Breach of Clause 2: Bringing discredit upon, and reducing confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry
Breach of Clause 3.1: Promoting an unlicensed medicine
Breach of Clause 7.2: Making a misleading claim
Breach of Clause 7.9: Making claims that did not reflect the available evidence regarding possible adverse reactions
Breach of Clause 9.1: Failing to maintain high standards
Vaccines are prescription-only medicines, whether licensed or unlicensed. Under UK law, advertising or promotion of prescription-only medicines to the public is prohibited. Did PMCPA report this violation to authorities? If not, why not?
The complaint above was received by PMCPA on 15 February 2023 and completed a year later on 1 March 2024. After receiving details of the complaint from PMCPA, Pfizer discovered that four other Pfizer employees in the UK had re-tweeted the same post that was the subject of the complaint. The full report notes that the re-tweets by Pfizer employees have been deleted but doesn’t mention when this happened. It could have been within a day of Pfizer being contacted by PMCPA or it could have been many months later. The re-tweets had been publicly visible for more than two years by the time the complaint was made.
Although it’s not clear how efficient or effective PMCPA’s complaints procedure is, if you see pharmaceutical companies breaching the ABPI Code of Practice you can submit a complaint to PMCPA HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
“Pfizer is ‘deeply sorry’ ” – they said that after a PMCPA ruling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnVTj2Uy9yc
If you don’t have time to watch it all, in the notes (click on “More”) he has summarised the contents of his talk in bullet points with links to documents.
Unfortunatly I do not think anything will come of it as it was a world wide Government psyop, and in the UK we had the Nudge Unit, Sage and the Government, and all the bought University idiots promoting and pushing it, no jab, no job, no travel and the demonization of the un-vaxxed. Herd manipulation at its most evil.
What in your estimation would happen in the UK should it all happen again? Would the country explode into turmoil, or would the herd just follow along?
I would say a lot have woken up to this scam over the last 2-3 years
although the beep said 5% refused the jab – it was clearly shown that about 27% of uk refused it, i know a few that will not take it again – but some are just gone with the wind – i would gather about 55% will not be conned, but if it means losing your job it will be less
but then – are the goverments stupid enough to push another? are they happy to advertise the next jab this may – to the ever forever gullible 45%?
Yes, the 27% who did not take, including the first 1st, then 2nd…. the booster rates are dropping like a brick as well.
Yes, the Sage Nudge Unit … wasn’t it called SB-1 (NO – SPI-B) or something similar ?. UK Column also discussed “this lot” and on the UK Web government web site, they even had the minutes of meeting posted … in one set, they even openly admitted that they had to “ramp up the fear campaign”….
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-b-the-role-of-behavioural-science-in-the-coronavirus-outbreak-14-march-2020
There was something called SPI-B, but I believe the Nudge Unit was actually the Behavioural Insights Team.
They say about the “activities relating to the companies’ covid “vaccines” – “bringing discredit on the pharmaceutical industry”.
Discredit was brought on the pharmaceutical industry long before the coronavirus shots arrived. Over decades, they have constantly been fined for bribery and other crimes and they were brought into disrepute by lying over their products, for example exaggerating the benefits and covering up the harmful side effects.
With a track record like that, why did anyone trust the “vaccines?
Probably because people either don’t read the news or they did read about the fines on the companies, but soon forgot it so they never joined the dots.
Then there are the points about human psychology as explained in yesterday’s article – “From covid mass formation to Ukraine mass formation”, which explains why, “Even a small child could see from the beginning that the story was falling apart in every direction” but people still followed the orders to take the vaxx.
“In some cases, the pharmaceutical companies were found guilty of promoting vaccines to the public which is unlawful in the UK”
Eh? I seem to remember bloated john**ein promoting it like anything. Oh, right, as long as it isn’t “official” promotion.
Like everything in the “uk”, it’s endless layers of lies and abuse all aimed at maintaining the caste system.
Still the great brainwashed fall for every lie. I don’t think I’m that clever but the monumental stupidity is astounding. People believe the most absurd BS but they have great difficulty with believing the truth. The more we change the more we stay the same.
People think hands were the most washed part of the body during the scamdemic, but it was actually brains!
[…] Covid vaccines: Pharmaceutical companies violated the UK code of practice on 53 occasions […]
[…] Source: https://expose-news.com/2025/03/19/pharma-violated-the-uk-code-of-practice/ […]
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
They should be fined. Not the derisory amount they would normally get. It should be many billions, at least half their profits from the toxic jab, perhaps more. Something that hits them hardest at something they really care about so it could be more of a deterrent. The money they are fined ought to go to the victims of the jab. Okay, fantasy over, they’ll just get the equivalent of a slap on the wrist.
[…] a shocking revelation, Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have been found guilty of breaching the UK pharmaceutical code of practice a staggering 53 times over the past four years, raising serious questions about the integrity of […]
[…] a shocking revelation, Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have been found guilty of breaching the UK pharmaceutical code of practice a staggering 53 times over the past four years, raising serious questions about the integrity of […]
I have been covertly jabbed twice and lost everything, I am incapacitated, not sure if I will get justice through but I’d love to speak my truths
How were you covertly jabbed?
[…] Înrudite: Vaccinuri Covid: Companiile farmaceutice au încălcat codul de practică din Marea Britanie în 53 … […]
[…] Related: Covid vaccines: Pharmaceutical companies violated the UK code of practice on 53 occasions […]
[…] Related: Covid vaccines: Pharmaceutical companies violated the UK code of practice on 53 occasions […]
[…] Relatif: Vaccins Covid: Les sociétés pharmaceutiques ont violé le code de pratique du Royaume-Uni à 53 re… […]
[…] Relacionado: Vacunas Covid: las empresas farmacéuticas violaron el código de prácticas del Reino Unido en 53 o… […]
[…] Related: Covid vaccines: Pharmaceutical companies violated the UK code of practice on 53 occasions […]