|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Tokenisation, a central feature of Technocracy, is the process of converting assets, rights or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems, which can be used to create a control grid and enable surveillance, behavioural control and elite dominance.
The implementation of tokenisation by Technocrats will lead to a loss of freedom and equity, as assets can be centrally controlled, programmed, tracked and censored. People will be stopped from using their assets if they behave in a way that is not permitted.
During the Technocracy Roundtable, Aaron Day, Courtenay Turner, Patrick Wood and Craig Wenclewicz discussed the dangers of tokenisation and the importance of bringing control back to the local level
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
On Wednesday, the first Technocracy Roundtable was held. Moderated by Courtenay Turner, the panellists were Patrick Wood, Aaron Day and Craig Wenclewicz. Yesterday, we published an article about one of the segments, which we titled ‘What is Technocracy?’. Our article also included a brief description of each of the Roundtable’s participants, which we won’t repeat here.
This article is about the next segment: tokenisation. This is an important topic because we are currently witnessing the push toward network states and tokenised societies, which is central to the Technocrats’ vision.
“Tokenisation is a huge part of both the incoming financial system as well as really being able to execute technocracy,” Turner said introducing the topic at the Roundtable.
In a comprehensive essay published last month, Turner described tokenisation as follows:
Tokenisation [is] the process of converting assets, rights or identities into digital tokens on blockchain or similar systems.
By replacing democratic institutions with tokenised systems, they risk creating a control grid – a networked, technocratic infrastructure that centralises power under the guise of decentralisation, enabling surveillance, behavioural control and elite dominance.
Tokenisation and the Control Grid: The Phoenix-Like Ambitions of Game B, Network States, TheoBros, Peter Thiel, and the Dark Enlightenment, The Phoenix Conspiracy by Courtenay Turner, 10 July 2025
Aaron Day, who is currently writing a book on tokenisation, said, “It’s about freedom versus technocracy. It’s about free will. And the battleground is actually tokenisation.”
He doesn’t consider tokenisation inherently negative; rather, it is the intent of those implementing it that determines whether its impact is good or bad. He went on to explain what the implementation looks like from a technocrat’s perspective. “You can see this in terms of how CBDCs [ ] or stablecoins work,” he said.
“CBDCs or stablecoins are just a digital token that represents a dollar … But in the technocratic version of this, there are some features about these tokens that are alarming. They can be centrally controlled and issued. They can be programmed. They can be tracked. And they can be censored,” Day explained.
He continued, “But [the Technocrats are] not just stopping at tokenising money. They literally want to tokenise every asset on Earth. They want to tokenise stocks, bonds, commodities, everything that you can imagine, they want to tokenise.”
Combined with a social credit system, this would mean that not only can they stop you from using your money if you behave in such a way that they do not permit, but “they can actually stop you from moving any of your assets or even potentially using your assets.”
To explain how having the power over our assets would affect us practically, Day used the example of where people are forced into only using electric cars and there’s a token representing that car. “That car that could actually be shut off remotely,” he said.
“That’s essentially what they’re working towards.”
Last month, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (“GENIUS Act”) came into force in the US. It establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins.
Also in July, the US House of Representatives passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (“Clarity Act”), which establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, such as stocks, shares, bonds and commodity derivatives.
A couple of months before, in May, the House of Representatives passed the CBDC Anti-Surveillance Act, which prohibits Federal Reserve banks from offering products or services directly to individuals, maintaining accounts on behalf of individuals or issuing a CBDC directly to individuals.
The GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act establish stablecoins and digital assets that are centralised versions of tokens which are controlled and managed by third parties, Day explained. “So, it is really the platform by which they implement technocracy.”
“They’ve been making changes legally over the last several decades … They’ve already laid the groundwork for technocracy legally. Tokenisation just takes it to that next level by making it something that they can shift ownership and control with a click of a mouse button,” he said.
Day continued: “People don’t realise how much financial surveillance we already have. There’s this misunderstanding that somehow, we actually already have freedom.
“Our money is already digital. The Federal Reserve uses an Oracle database. Most of our transactions are digital. The money that we use today is already programmable and censorable, [although] not as much as it will be under this tokenisation scheme. So, tokenisation just adds more to this.
“I identified 13 different federal programmes that are involved in regulating money … We are already financially surveilled. And now they’re applying all of that to digital tokens, which is going to give them more instantaneous control over all of our assets.”
Currently, Turner explained, “There’s still equity. Equity that people can leverage. But when you tokenise, you don’t have equity – they seize the assets.” She used the example of land ownership to demonstrate the enormous impact this will have.
“Somebody owns their home now: unless you have a land patent, you still pay taxes so you’re essentially renting it from the government, you’re leasing your property from the government, but you still have equity that you could leverage. And that is actually what most people in this country do for small businesses,” Turner said.
“If you take away that ability to have leverage for equity, you’re going to eliminate most of the small business capacity in this country. Which I think would be devastating, but it’s very much aligned with their plans to put everything into the big corporations, the conglomerates, the public-private partnerships with the NGOs.”
Related:
- The Great Taking: Have the global elite devised an elaborate plan to take everything we own? and other articles on The Exposé about “The Great Taking”
- The Carlyle Group: An example of how the Global Public Private Partnership works and other articles on The Exposé that make mention of “public-private partnerships”
The US dollar is the world’s reserve currency, Craig Wenclewicz said. “As soon as we move away from this situation where we have a currency [such as the US dollar] that represents a boundary or a culture or a geographic productivity of a people, then all of a sudden, we tear down all the boundaries, and it’s a free-for-all.
“And that’s what it looks like these technocrats want. They want to implode the system and then they get a free-for-all because then everything’s up for grabs. And it’s easy for them [to grab it] because they already have the databases in place. They’re already transacting. They’re already monitoring all this stuff.”
Wenclewicz believes there’s going to be a sovereign debt crisis that’s going to initiate the implosion of the system. He doesn’t know where that crisis will begin, it “could be in Japan, could be in China, could be in Europe,” he said.
How do we stop it? “You’ve got to bring it back to local because if you let this stay at the top level, federal level, global level, whatever, it’s going to unravel and it’s going to be a free-for-all. If you can bring it back to the local level and you can get privacy and you can actually transact and have trustworthy transactions again with some form of currency,” he said.
Turner added that she believes being able to self-govern is a defence against tyranny. But to be able to self-govern effectively, people need to understand philosophical truths, such as our inalienable rights given to us by God.
Day believes there’s not one solution but a variety of solutions. The way he describes Technocracy is “one global currency that’s backed by energy credits, where the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the UN are the elements of a social credit system that’s tied to that energy credit-based currency.”
“The threat,” he said, “is CBDCs and regulated stablecoins. What’s the counter? Something like Freedom Dollar, which is a privacy-backed stablecoin. What is the threat? Public health tyranny. What is the counter? A global P2P [peer-to-peer] healthcare marketplace where people outside of insurance, outside of the entire system, essentially a global medical tourism marketplace that’s completely private.”
“So, the whole idea here is to incubate a whole variety of projects [to counteract the Technocrats] … Solutions [that] can be used locally, but [ ] can also be used globally. So, for instance, I think it would be helpful if farmers could have an online marketplace where they could sell their goods not just locally, but they could sell their goods anywhere,” Day explained.
Bitcoin isn’t one of the solutions. Day recommends people read the book ‘Hijacking Bitcoin: The Hidden History of BTC’. “[Bitcoin was] hobbled and intentionally hijacked between 2015 and 2017 … there was kind of a technocratic takeover of Bitcoin,” he said.
The way Bitcoin now works is similar to the way carbon credits work, Day said. The people who pushed Bitcoin to work that way “had ties to the Bilderberg group, had ties to traditional finance, had ties to the intelligence agencies and MIT, which had funding from Jeffrey Epstein.”
For those interested in hearing the full discussion on tokenisation and related topics, the above provides an overview of a much more comprehensive conversation that took place between timestamps 22:39 and 1:14:22 in the video below.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Are there any ideas Rhoda, on how to avoid ID registration for prepaid sim cards?
In my country in EU, they voted a law, where they will terminate all prepaid sim cards that do not do registration after a deadline.
I am not sure if this a bad thing but I take it that way. We even had case of government working person threatening (by saying that they know stuff for them) another person on social media, because they were criticizing the president.
I am sure Government will keep track.
Hi John, off hand I have no suggestions about how to avoid digital ID registration, sadly to be able to use certain services (particularly online) we will be forced. Individually, we cannot win this battle – we have to band together and send a strong message.
As for me, my plan is to do as little online as possible (e.g. I very rarely buy things online, I refuse to use cryptocurrencies and I keep my digital footprint as low as possible, as in I’m careful which sites I sign up to and which social media sites I use etc) and I avoid facial recognition etc where ever I see it (e.g. avoid using shops that use it, wear a cap to hide the face etc).