|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
A large cohort study in Italy found a 36% increased incidence of hospitalisation for all cancers among those who received at least one covid vaccination compared to the unvaccinated.
The study found statistically significant increased incidence of hospitalisation for bowel cancer (54% higher), breast cancer (54% higher) and bladder cancer (105% higher) among the vaccinated.
“The increases reported in Italy are substantial and alarming. However, New Zealand Health authorities are still maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective,” Dr. Guy Hatchard writes.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Major Study: mRNA Vaccines Multiply the Incidence of Cancer
By Dr. Guy Hatchard, 2 September 2025
A large cohort study conducted in Italy and published in the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences is entitled ‘Covid-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and hospitalisation for cancer: 30-month cohort study in an Italian province’. The study followed the cancer hospitalisation records of the 296,015 population (aged 11+) of the Pescara province in the Abruzzo region of central Italy from June 2021 to December 2023. It compared the hospitalisation records of those covid-19 vaccinated (83%) with the unvaccinated (17%) for nine categories of cancer.
The study found a 36% increased incidence of hospitalisation for all cancers (p<0.001) among those who had received at least one covid-19 vaccination compared to those unvaccinated.
Taken by individual cancer type, if you had had at least one covid-19 vaccination, the study found a statistically significant increased incidence of hospitalisation compared to the unvaccinated for three types of cancer:
- Colon-rectum (bowel) cancer was 54% higher (p<0.046),
- Breast cancer 54% higher (p<0.012),
- Bladder cancer 105% higher (p<0.022).
The other types of cancer showing increased incidence were Uterine (+93%), Ovarian (+105%), Thyroid (+30%) and Haematological (Blood) (+50%), but due to the small number of cases recorded the relative increased risks for these last four types were not statistically significant. There was no increase in lung and prostate cancers.
This is a complex study which investigated many factors including interactions between covid-19 infection, covid-19 vaccination, gender, age, time lapse, cancer and all-cause mortality. The authors do not rush to hard and fast conclusions. They urge that more work needs to be done to evaluate the full extent of cancer risks from covid-19 vaccines for the wider population.
Some cancers are considered to develop over longer time periods than the study duration of 30 months. Thus, the extent of the longer-term incidence of cancer following covid-19 vaccination could be higher than that measured. Moreover, many other factors affect the development of cancers including comorbidities, stress, diet and willingness to seek medical help promptly.
The study excluded any cancers not resulting in hospitalisation and any cases of cancer recurrence, a phenomenon which has already been flagged by senior oncologists in the UK as a risk of covid vaccination they have seen in their practices.
The Italian study found that those who had a covid-19 infection before receiving covid-19 vaccination had a lower increase in cancer hospitalisation rate than those who did not. This may imply that prior covid-19 infection conferred some degree of protective effect against any adverse outcome of subsequent covid-19 vaccination on the overall immune system, although the authors do not suggest this.
There are sound scientific reasons to suspect that mRNA vaccination can cause long-term genetic instability known to be associated with cancer incidence. See, for example, this review paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Precision Sciences entitled ‘Unintended Genetic Consequences of mRNA Vaccines: Evaluating Risks of Transcriptional Disruption, HLA Alteration, and Genomic Integration’. Such risks cannot be safely ignored. At the moment, they are being swept under the carpet by New Zealand Health authorities who should be those protecting public health.
Cancer incidence data is currently only available up to 2022 in New Zealand. Data for 2023 is not expected to be published until the end of this year. However, no attempt has been made by Health New Zealand to compare the cancer outcomes of the covid-19 vaccinated with the unvaccinated. This leaves the public and health professionals themselves uninformed of the risks of covid-19 vaccination.
The increases reported in Italy are substantial and alarming. However, New Zealand Health authorities are still maintaining the fiction that covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective, gaslighting the public. In turn, journalists are still talking about misinformation and conspiracy in this regard.
We Do Not Have A Good History of Judicial Protection Here In New Zealand
In 1979, an Air New Zealand plane crashed into Mount Erebus in Antarctica, killing 257 passengers and crew, a disaster which touched families across the nation. A Royal Commission of Inquiry led by Justice Mahon awarded costs against the airline and determined that “Air New Zealand had taken an adversary stance in the inquiry, and had proceeded based on “a pre-determined plan of deception” and “an orchestrated litany of lies.”
However, the Court of Appeal overruled Justice Mahon’s conclusions and quashed the costs order on the legal technicality that Air New Zealand had not been given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the charge of deception. As a result, Justice Mahon was forced into retirement and his reputation was tainted. Subsequently, the UK Privy Council found that Air New Zealand had indeed given false testimony. It took forty years for the Crown and Air New Zealand to finally apologise to Justice Mahon.
This infamous miscarriage of justice involved 257 lives, a figure dwarfed by pandemic deaths. As we have been reporting, according to Our World in Data, so far, the pandemic years have involved more than 7000 excess deaths in New Zealand (and 30 million around the world). There has been no substantial recognition by the New Zealand government of the implications of the likely gain-of-function origin of covid-19 or the effect of mass mRNA vaccinations on public health. The cancer data from Italy only underlines that there are continuing risks and effects which need robust investigation and assessment.
The latest figure for New Zealand births and deaths to June 2025 shows that during the preceding 12 months, there have been an additional 950 excess deaths. Why is our government remaining silent? In what way is the New Zealand Medical Council, which is pretending to “zero risk” from covid-19 vaccination, different from those who lied to Justice Mahon and sought to cover their tracks?
The Italian cancer study shows that any further obfuscation and delay on the part of New Zealand authorities could have fatal consequences on an even larger scale.
It is long past time for the establishment to come clean but, instead, Parliament is proposing to deregulate biotechnology by tabling the Gene Technology Bill which pretends, against all evidence, that forms of gene editing are inherently safe. The Bill contains a provision which exonerates those involved from any criminal liability. This is not just a failure of intelligence, but also legitimises the right of the government to ignore any loss of life resulting from its own actions, even if that loss of life is substantial.
In proposing to pass the Gene Technology Bill, Parliament has decided it can ignore the provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights. No doubt former Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer drafted the Bill of Rights to prevent just such an overreach of government authority. Yet the courts remain as deferential to authority and accepting of injustice as they did 40 years ago following the Erebus disaster. They have failed and are still failing to uphold the provisions of the Bill of Rights during the pandemic as it relates to medical choice, compensation and employment rights.
The study we considered today has flagged an increased risk of cancer for those who received a covid-19 vaccination. The study authors strongly urge the urgent completion of further investigation. Published science demands careful consideration and action. Ignoring, suppressing or distorting scientific information and debate places the New Zealand government on the bottom rung of intelligence, caution and effective public healthcare.
Cancer is not a welcome guest in any family; it is a tragedy. Risking more should not be the role of any government, court or health authority. There can be no arguing with this point.
It is time to wake up and oppose the passage of the Gene Technology Bill. We have until 11 October to contact our Members of Parliament to influence the conclusions of the Health Select Committee and alert our colleagues, friends and family to the dangers of the Gene Technology Bill.
If you would like to know more in-depth about the risks of biotechnology experimentation, you can do so by reviewing our Substack article ‘The Long Read: Twenty Reasons to Completely Reject Biotechnology Experimentation’. You can subscribe there for regular updates to your inbox, which do not duplicate Hatchard Reports.
We rely entirely on donations to keep going. A big thank you to everyone who has helped. Currently, we are falling behind and ask for your support if you are not already participating.
About the Author
Guy Hatchard, PhD, is a New Zealander who was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID).
You can subscribe to Dr. Hatchard’s websites, HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL, for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology. You can also follow Dr. Hatchard on Twitter HERE, Facebook HERE and Substack HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
We used to live in the Abruzzo area and two of our male friends were mandated to take the vax or lose their jobs. One recently was hospitalised with a brain bleed and the other fell down stairs and broke several bones in his body and had to learn to walk again (perhaps lost consciousness – as he had been using those stairs all of his life!). Countless people are getting cancer at young age – particularly breast cancer. Dr Doloris Cahil in Ireland said at the very beginning that those that take the vax will likely be dead within the 5 years after, it is a ticking time bomb for virtually every family.
Hi TPerry,
All is not lost.
EDTA , DMSO, Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Chlorine dioxide, and NAC, are all worth trying. to get rid of the C19 effects.
Yes sir. They can save people. Thanks for listing them for people to see. Hopefully some will investigate and use them to be healed.
Here in UK, as a 64 year old and thus in the alleged “high risk” category, they continue to offer Covid vaccinations at least twice a year. As a former Lymphoma patient, I’m well aware that my risk of resurgence of the disease if I had a jab is massive (but I’ve not had a jab) and they use the fact of my previous Lymphoma and my age as two of the reasons I SHOULD get the jab! I’m convinced the authorities are Malthusians in intent and target the elderly/middle aged as perfect targets. They’d rather not pay my State Pension and would prefer me dead. I won’t take the annual MRNA “flu” vax they also offer to folks of my age, as two friends of mine did just that and both died within a year.
Hi Leonard Vincent, I salute you, sir.
At first, I was shed on from a friend who has passed away, and I never knowingly received the so-called vaccines, but did visit the dentist and heard it is in the lidocaine. My liver started to not process the food I ate, so I have the book, “MMS health and recovery guidebook by Jim Humble, and ordered the MMS solution on the internet along with DMSO, and feeling much better now.