|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The abolition of money, as originally proposed by Karl Marx, would inevitably lead to surveillance because every input and output must be tracked.
Marx’s ideology, when implemented, would result in a system of control and rationing of energy – which is the goal of technocracy.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The following is a Substack note posted by Escape key (“Esc”) to which we have added some hyperlinks and resources to help provide context.
Marx and Money
By Esc
The moment Karl Marx abolishes money, surveillance becomes inevitable because every input and output must be tracked manually – and that’s a blueprint of liberation? Hah, it’s the blueprint for a panopticon.
Marx built the blueprint for surveillance by eliminating money, while Lenin operationalised it, openly demanding accounting and control as the essence of socialism, while simultaneously calling for a vanguard police state to uphold it.
Hah, such liberty and freedom.
It’s even particularly retarded because the elimination of money itself. This essentially leads to a situation where the person cannot possibly be left with a free choice in terms of spending their own money.
If you opt to argue that what the person receives to spend as he sees fit is vouchers in “units of social labour time,” then – congratulations – you’ve arrived back with a currency.
I’m now more convinced than ever that Marx and Engels were frauds.
We can then further add the producer-consumer analysis in ‘Das Kapital’, an early-stage input-output analysis, which fundamentally assumes perfect knowledge – but to have perfect knowledge, we’re back to full-spectrum surveillance.
None of this retarded religion makes any logical sense. Well … unless you’re a central bank that is.
Incidentally, central banks are the only organisations with the information available to even attempt to implement Marx’s stupid system, as they sit at the apex of information relating to monetary flows.
It’s just another coincidence, I’m sure.
The circular economy thus logically becomes the full information visibility Marx demands, and it’s set in Boulding’s closed system, which means a singular measured organism, which is the basis Marx operated on.
Ooh, I get it … the circular economy itself is pretty sketchy because most non-renewable materials don’t actually disappear. Sure, e.g., metal dug up from the ground changes in form and what it’s integrated in, but only really energy resources change form …. and that then takes us to the central pivot point of technocracy – energy. And the future carbon-backed CBDC is essentially the inverse of the “energy certificate” of Technocracy Inc.
Related: UK green tax on household goods is part of Agenda 2030 and the circular economy
Consequently, from a logical perspective, Marx’s retarded ideology … actually, scratch that … hyper-deceptive ideology logically leads to control and rationing of energy, and to control that, you have to eliminate nuclear energy. Renewables are not really a major issue because they cannot really compete with energy resources such as oil in terms of flexibility and ease of storage.
Consequently, Marx’s religion logically leads to surveillance and rationing of energy – which is what technocracy seeks to implement.
That also explains why the currency must be split up into two – one accumulates interest (not for the proles) and the other has an expiry date, because you cannot allow people to save, as it distorts the claimed perfect informational view.
That also explains why they intend to fuse carbon backing with CBDCs – it’s the theoretical justification for communism realised through its practical implementation – and the circular economy then completes the picture with a full informational view. And an ISO standard is perfect here, because it, as I’ve pointed out [see below], is a key part of the ISO/OECD/IIASA triad of collectivism.
And social credit systems and ESG scoring then become the basis for the reward mechanisms feeding into the currency itself, where “positive” behaviours are rewarded and “negative” are punished. And that, once again, leads to complete surveillance and audited control, much like Lenin called for (and never mind the vanguard police state backing this up with force).
Related: ESG: The social credit system for business, Esc, 26 July 2023
So, we have, in essence, arrived with the Spaceship Earth Skinner box, I mused only recently… haha Marx then logically leads to Spinoza, where the substance is money, the unit of account …
Further reading: Technocratic Inversion, How Marx Provided the Blueprint for Central Banking Control, Esc, 7 September 2025
[We are placing the video below to add to Esc’s note. Produced by Rich Planet TV in October 2022, it demonstrates how CDBCs, which can be programmed with limitations based on any criteria of their choosing, will impact your everyday life.]
If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on Odysee HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
I don’t know what these so called data centers are, but they are huge and look like prisons.
They are for AI, they will replace humans everywhere.
« The abolition of money, as originally proposed by Karl Marx, would inevitably lead to surveillance because every input and output must be tracked. »
This is a gratuitous statement that is based on absolutely nothing.
“Freedom is the ultimate weapon of life against the dictatorship of profit!”
By abolishing money (cash, CBDC or whatever), we take away the primary means of control from those who want to control everything. Which is exactly the opposite of what you claim.
If there is no more money, there is no longer any reason to verify inputs and outputs one by one. And above all, there is no longer anyone who can enforce a system of control of inputs and outputs.
Some people seem to think money is a way to prevent theft. But money has been around for thousands of years. If money could eliminate thieves, this problem would have been solved a long time ago.
But no, money was invented by thieves to simplify the sale of stolen goods. If there were no more money, everything would be free, and there would be no incentive for thieves to steal goods that anyone can get for free at the store.
Hi Rhoda,
I should imagine that Karl Marx was not his real name.
Even Lenin used a false name, just like they do all over the world.
I have read it is ok to have a false name in the US politics.
Even the presidents like Obama used a made up name.
Why have leaders in Israel all used false names.
We never know who to believe, because of false names.
People are very inventive and creative and if they abolish current money people will trade in all kinds of ways with black markets, barter, labour etc.