|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The global mafia is trying to replace our real food with a fake gene-edited variety, without even telling us it is doing so. It wants to change regulations so that natural food and genetically modified (“GM”) laboratory food are legally regarded as the same thing!
This is not some “conspiracy theory,” but a very real proposal currently being pushed through by corporate-controlled authorities.
It is happening in Australia and New Zealand – longstanding colonies of the dark enslaving empire which are often used as testbeds for new forms of oppression. But you can be sure that, if they get away with it, this will then be rolled out everywhere.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Fake Food Alert: The Global Mafia’s New Assault On Our Health
By Paul Cudenec
Researcher Kate Mason is sounding the alarm and urging people in Australia and New Zealand to send in their objections before the fast-approaching deadline of Tuesday 10 September (6 pm Canberra time). You can read her report HERE and watch her video HERE.
She explains that FSANZ, Australia and New Zealand’s food authority, is proposing changes to the Food Standards Code which would deregulate gene-edited foods and deny customers any labelling. Kate warns that this would allow the global processed food industry to self-regulate all gene-edited foods!
Yet the gene-edited foods made with CRISPR, that FSANZ calls NBTs (New Breeding Techniques), have scant history of safe use as food and unknown future impacts on health and wellbeing.
FSANZ asserts that genetically edited food is the same as natural-conventional food, that it has the same “characteristics.” Under this definition, lab meat may be seen as the same as meat, as the lab meat has added synthetic vitamins and minerals which match the natural levels of vitamins and minerals in meat.
The public is being asked to go along with a hypothesis that synthetic is the same as natural. It’s not!
Genetically edited food to be deregulated in Australia and NZ, Kate Mason, 7 September 2024
Adds Bob Phelps, director of campaign group GeneEthics:
FSANZ would amend the definitions of “food produced using gene technology” and “gene technology” in the Food Standards Code, to exempt from any regulation the gene-modified organisms, fermentations and chemicals, used to make synthetic foods.
The food industry would not be required to notify FSANZ, so can avoid any assessment, regulation and labelling.
So, gene-edited fake meat, mock milk, synthetic seafood, processing aids, additives, nutritive substances, colourings and flavourings – even those not yet invented – would be sold in secret.
Shoppers would entirely lose our right to know and choose what to feed our families.
Gene-edited foods would also greatly expand the supply of highly refined and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) which are rightly blamed for rising rates of disease – obesity; diabetes; colorectal cancer; and, heart trouble – even in young people.
FSANZ disregards the health, well-being and safety of families, with decisions that unfairly favour the global junk food industry and its addictive, gene-edited, highly-refined and ultra-processed fake food.
Gene Ethics Australia media release regarding FSANZ P1055 Proposal, Genetically edited food to be deregulated in Australia and NZ, Kate Mason, 7 September 2024
An official document quite blatantly sets out the motive behind this assault on our health, listing “benefits” to the food industry such as “increased production efficiencies” and – crucially! – “increased profits.”
FSANZ notes, from its surveys, a “lack of knowledge” amongst the public about the regulation of GM foods, but does not seem keen to put that right.
Asks Kate:
If FSANZ is aware the vast majority of Australians and New Zealanders are uneducated on NBTs, why are they pushing ahead with a community consultation?
If consumers do not agree that genetically edited food will mitigate climate change, why has FSANZ included this as a benefit to consumers in their costs and benefits document?
If consumers want regulation, why is FSANZ proposing to remove regulation of genetically edited food?
Which Begs the Question, Genetically edited food to be deregulated in Australia and NZ, Kate Mason, 7 September 2024
People can answer questions on the FSANZ portal HERE or email FSANZ their own submission at su*********@***************ov.au.
Please pass on this information to any contacts in the countries concerned.
We are talking about a criminal assault on the health and happiness of humankind.
I would add that the official language used in presenting these sinister proposals is very familiar to anyone who has delved into the world of the global criminocracy.
Take, for example, this sentence quoted by Kate: “Adopting an approach that is forward-looking and agile with respect to technology development will facilitate industry innovation.”
With regard to the word “agile,” Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) – that notorious public-facing front for the global mafia – has written about the need for “agile governance” in which he claims that “the pace of technological development and a number of characteristics of technologies render previous policy-making cycles and processes inadequate.”
He says: “The idea of reforming governance models to cope with new technologies is not new, but the urgency of doing so is far greater in light of the power of today’s emerging technologies … the concept of agile governance seeks to match the nimbleness, fluidity, flexibility and adaptiveness of the technologies themselves and the private-sector actors adopting them.”
And the word “innovation” is rolled out all the time by the global Leviathan.
As I explain in my 2023 book ‘The Great Racket’, it is repeatedly used by The Commonwealth (Empire), which even had a Commonwealth Innovation platform, boasting 27 “partner” organisations.
That now seems to have disappeared, or been hidden, but you can still see the archived page HERE.
Sitting proudly at the top of the list is the World Health Organisation, followed by the African Development Bank Group, the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data, the United Nations and five of its various sub-organisations.
We also find the likes of Bloomberg Philanthropies (founded by US billionaire Michael Bloomberg), the International Trade Centre (“a multilateral agency with a joint mandate with the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations through the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development”), Global Innovation Fund, an impact investment specialist and NDC Partnership, a big player in the world of “climate finance.”
In ‘Converging Against the Criminocracy’ I report that the term “innovation” has been used by the WEF, the United Nations Development Programme, the Global System for Mobile Communications Association, the Church of England’s Social Impact Investment Programme and British International Investment.
I also note that the Swiss-based Edmond de Rothschild entity, which pushes the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda, has established a strategic partnership in the realm of “innovative food,” technology linked to “alternative proteins,” new agricultural systems and the creation of “digital solutions” to nutrition.
In my latest book, ‘Against the Dark Enslaving Empire!’, I mention Israel’s Peres Centre for Peace and Innovation, whose international governors have included the likes of liquor-trade “philanthropist” Charles Bronfman, Baroness Ariane de Rothschild and the late Sir Evelyn de Rothschild.
If you can’t see what we’re up against here, you’re really not paying attention!
About the Author
Paul Cudenec self describes as a “deeply dissident journalist and author.” He has a background in the UK anarchist movement and became known more widely in 2020 for his outspoken criticism of the totalitarianism being rolled out worldwide on the back of the covid crisis.
He is the author of the book ‘The Anarchist Revelation: Being What We’re Meant To Be’, among several others.
He publishes articles on his Winter Oak and Organic Radicals websites. He also publishes articles on his Substack page which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] – Food Standards in Australia and New Zealand are being changed so real food can be replaced with fake… […]
Start to wonder if all these authorities think there above not only laws of the people but Gods of the spirit, their days are numbered in authority positions because no more wool pulled over the peoples eyes they are waking up
If you are being driven to be ‘innovative’ leave your job.
It is the red flag that you are being exploited to do things that are immoral and unethical.
It happened to my colleagues and I beginning as far back as the 1980s. It even led to a suicide.
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
[…] https://expose-news.com/2024/09/08/food-standards-in-australia-and-new-zealand/ […]
Thanks Rhoda for alerting us to this.
I was completely unaware of this. Clearly the media release Kate Mason sent out was not widely taken up by MSM. I glance through our local paper but it is the home of the Murdoch Empire; I never watch TV news or current affairs, etc. So I may have missed something but I doubt it.
My state of South Australia was the last mainland state to be GM free – there was a moratorium until a few years ago. There was a state govt enquiry about lifting the moratorium and we could make submissions – the terms of reference did not include health effects!!! My husband and I were health professionals – as he said “isn’t that the point?” So I researched and made a submission, received a polite reply, but the change went ahead anyway, of course.
This proposal is worse and there are less than 30 hours for me to make a submission, which I will do immediately.
Thanks for all you do to help raise awareness in the world.
May I add, and I know this may not be in your control, that I pay a monthly donation to your organisation because I believe in your work. Every time I open an Expose message, I am still bombarded with boxes on the screen, and a red banner at the top of the screen with a flashing black box “please donate now”. I already do donate so how can it be made to STOP? I have tried emailing via another avenue then I immediately stopped getting your emails 🙁 Took ages to track down and reverse. Please help 🙂
Hi Medicine Woman, thank you for your kind words and your support. Both are much appreciated.
Regarding the email, I’m unable to help as I’m not involved in the IT or the admin side of things. I would assume it is a setting on the site which probably has little option to tailor settings to individual users. We also do not keep a record of donations or personal details of our donors. So we have no way of knowing who of our subscribers has donated and who has not.
I have the same issue. Incredibly frustrating.
[…] Read more: Food Standards in Australia and New Zealand are being changed so real food can be replace… […]
[…] An official document quite blatantly sets out the motive behind this assault on our health, listing “benefits” to the food industry such as “increased production efficiencies” and – crucially! – “increased profits.” Read more… […]
[…] It’s becoming increasingly common to find food on American store shelves that admits to being GMO or “bioengineered” in the fine print, but shoppers in Australia and New Zealand may soon not even have the benefit of this crucial disclosure if a proposed law is passed. […]