Sexual violence is being normalised. Children and teenagers are increasingly being exposed to deviant and violent sexual practices online, they then grow up to be adults who are unable to engage in healthy intimacy. Â Â This is a problem Jonathon Van Maren has been highlighting and warning about for years, and recent reports are proving him right.
Reports highlight the growing problem of men viewing child abuse material after becoming desensitised to normal porn, with over 850 men being arrested monthly in England and Wales for online child abuse offences. Experts point to the role of easily accessible online pornography in fuelling demand and pushing users to increasingly extreme content.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The ExposĂŠ to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The Shifting Narrative Around Pornography
By Jonathon Van Maren, as published by First Things
There has been a fundamental shift in the public debate on pornography over the past decade. In 2017, I took the affirmative side in a radio debate with a queer studies professor on the question âIs pornography inherently harmful to society?â Much of what I highlighted then – the normalisation and mainstreaming of sexual violence, pervasive porn addiction beginning in preadolescence, the consequent inability to engage in or even understand healthy intimacy – is now the position of panicky government officials from the UK to France.
Hardly a week goes by without some news story highlighting the devastating effects of ubiquitous porn use across the West and beyond. Two reports from May alone highlight this fact with chilling clarity.
The first is a disturbing report in The Guardian by Harriet Grant on the growing phenomenon of men who do not have the profile of a typical paedophile – a sexual interest in children – nonetheless being arrested for viewing and possessing child abuse material. These men ended up viewing child pornography when their addictions escalated and spiralled out of control. As one told her: âI didnât start out wanting to see kids. I was addicted to porn and I went down a road of being totally desensitised as I got further and further from what was normal.â
In England and Wales, 850 men are being arrested monthly for âonline child abuse offences.â Similar trends are emerging elsewhere. Grant notes that we face âa spiralling global crisisâ with law enforcement and child protection experts consistently pinpointing one culprit: âthe explosion over the past 10 to 20 years of free-to-view and easily accessible online pornography ⌠A growing body of research is beginning to warn of how problematic porn habits can be a pathway into viewing images of children being abused.â
Grant observes that the explosion of extreme content, including child abuse imagery, is not merely feeding a demand but fuelling one. Users crave porn for the dopamine; to achieve consistent arousal, they must escalate their usage; algorithms deliver a constant digital diet of depravity. Viewers have been pushed to edgy material for a long time (as evidenced by the âBarely Legalâ phenomenon). As one man related: âYou know itâs wrong, but the dopamine hit from what you are doing overrides everything else. I think the pathways in my brain had been changed by all the porn I had watched ⌠You feel sick and horrible.â
Significantly, most of the men who eventually encountered child pornography did not actually search for it. The Finnish group Protect Children profiled 4,549 anonymous child sexual abuse offenders and found that not only was pornography a key âfacilitating factor,â but over 50 per cent first saw child abuse material when they were not seeking it. Michael Sheath, who has worked with child abusers for more than thirty years, told Grant: âI see men who have gone down what I call an âescalating pathway.â The link is unambiguous ⌠The threshold for abusive behaviour is through the floor. It used to be that child abuse material was hard to find and looking at it was extremely risky.â Not anymore.
âWe are seeing people who are turning 18 and have had 10 yearsâ exposure to hardcore porn,â said Detective Chief Inspector Tony Garner, who heads a team of online child abuse officers in the UK. âMy officers are finding young people watching the most abhorrent material, including child abuse ⌠As a country, as a society, it feels completely out of control.â Meanwhile, Pornhub insists that it is not pushing viewers to increasingly extreme content, but that users merely âdiscoverâ new sexual themes.
A report in The New York Times by Nicholas Kristof tells a different story. Kristof reviewed internal documents from Pornhub accidentally released by a federal district court in Alabama, exposing many internal discussions. One exchange between staffers read: âThere is a LOT of very, very obvious and disturbing CSAM [child sexual abuse material] here.â Another document stated that as of May 2020, Pornhub âhad 706,000 videos available on the site that had been flagged by users for depicting rape or assaults on children or for other problems.â
Despite that, many videos remained available; Pornhub âdid not necessarily review a video for possible removal until it had been flagged at least 16 times.â Another private memo âacknowledged that videos with apparent child sexual abuse had been viewed 684 million times before being removedâ; another featured managers recommending that words such as âbrutal,â âchildhood,â âminor,â and âunwillingâ be permitted in video descriptions; a third note âsays that a person who posted a sexual video of a child shouldnât be banned from the site because âthe user made moneyâ.â
Many of the phrases Pornhub debated internally are too vile to print. Kristof reports that in 2020, âunderageâ turned up 183,301 videos on the site; 155,447 videos had the keyword â12yo.â Kristof concludes by stating that something clearly must be done about this crisis; he suggests that perhaps âwe can use civil and criminal penalties to incentivise the pornography industry to show only videos for which the website has verified age and consent.â This proposal, while a step in the right direction, avoids the fact that porn use almost always escalates.
A raft of recent age-verification legislation in the United States indicates that lawmakers are beginning to grapple with the social costs of pornography. Sen. Mike Lee went further, introducing the âInterstate Obscenity Definition Actâ in May, which would include pornography under the category of âobscenityâ and essentially render much of this material illegal. Leeâs proposal has been widely mocked, but those insisting on the necessity of protecting pornography in the name of free speech must be forced to answer key questions.
Do we want to live in a society where it is normative for children to be exposed to extreme porn before puberty, and their libidos wired to respond to sexual violence? Where almost a quarter of adult American women reportedly âfelt scared during sexâ due to porn-inspired violence like choking? Where underage porn users are increasingly abusing other children? Where men are being transformed into sex offenders by pornography that is increasingly difficult to avoid? Where innocence is increasingly impossible?
These reports reveal the society we have chosen to create by prioritising so-called âsexual libertyâ over the safety and innocence of women and children. We now know where this social experiment has taken us, and what it has cost us. It is a growing consensus, not just among conservatives but across all fields, that pornography has been a tremendously destructive force. It is time to reverse our priorities and to recognise that digital pornography is lethal poison in our cultural groundwater and should be treated as such.
About the Author
Jonathon Van Maren is a Canadian writer and author. He is the author of âThe Culture War, Seeing is Believing: Why Our Culture Must Face the Victims of Abortionâ, âPatriots: The Untold Story of Irelandâs Pro-Life Movementâ, âPrairie Lion: The Life and Times of Ted Byfieldâ, and co-author of âA Guide to Discussing Assisted Suicideâ with Blaise Alleyne. He serves as the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. Itâs secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
And I’ll bet they’re recording you for future blackmail. This is like an old episode from Black Mirror. Keep your nose clean.
Hi Chris W, good point!
The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good. Proverbs 15:3.
Yeah ! The all seeing eye. Its even on the dollar bills .
That’s the Eye of Horus, i.e. Satan!
That eye is at the top of the pyramid-and under the base is written NOVUS ORDER SECLORUM (New Order of the Ages-New World Order), that is the coming one world government under antichrist.
This has been a long time in the planning…
On the reverse of the US$1 bill it reads:
IN GOD WE TRUST
ONE
It should read in low case:
In god (Satan) we trust
ONE
Sorry Rhoda, I shouldn’t have typed US1$!
Hi Islander, it’s okay, I’ve seen it and approved your comment. Do you want them to remain or shall I delete them if you feel they’re duplicating a subsequent comment?
Leave it as it is Rhoda, next time I must remember to type ONE DOLLAR BILL as Nabiru did!
I remember watching Barry Smith (passed away circa 2001) talking about the one dollar bill, saying “why would they put an Egyptian pyramid on the American dollar with the Eye of Horus on the top?”
It’s all too evident now…
Hi Islander, yes it has been well known for decades that the eye on the US one dollar represents, in short, the anti-Christ. Its strange that some people think it relates to God, who is also Christ.
Yes, well it is Satan’s policy to imitate God at every turn, for is he not the arch deceiver?
What hasn’t Satan mimicked? He is the god of the present age (2 Corinthians 4:4), plus he has his coming man antichrist (Revelation 13:1) and the false prophet (Revelation 13:11) – the unholy trinity!
Part of “The Big Have Less children Plan” ?